Identification of eRF1 residues that play critical and complementary roles in stop codon recognition

The initiation and elongation stages of translation are directed by codon-anticodon interactions. In contrast, a release factor protein mediates stop codon recognition prior to polypeptide chain release. Previous studies have identified specific regions of eukaryotic release factor one (eRF1) that are important for decoding each stop codon. The cavity model for eukaryotic stop codon recognition suggests that three binding pockets/cavities located on the surface of eRF1's domain one are key elements in stop codon recognition. Thus, the model predicts that amino acid changes in or near these cavities should influence termination in a stop codon-dependent manner. Previous studies have suggested that the TASNIKS and YCF motifs within eRF1 domain one play important roles in stop codon recognition. These motifs are highly conserved in standard code organisms that use UAA, UAG, and UGA as stop codons, but are more divergent in variant code organisms that have reassigned a subset of stop codons to sense codons. In the current study, we separately introduced TASNIKS and YCF motifs from six variant code organisms into eRF1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to determine their effect on stop codon recognition in vivo. We also examined the consequences of additional changes at residues located between the TASNIKS and YCF motifs. Overall, our results indicate that changes near cavities two and three frequently mediated significant effects on stop codon selectivity. In particular, changes in the YCF motif, rather than the TASNIKS motif, correlated most consistently with variant code stop codon selectivity.     

Common and specific amino acid residues in the prokaryotic polypeptide release factors RF1 and RF2: possible functional implications

Termination of protein synthesis is promoted in ribosomes by proper stop codon discrimination by class 1 polypeptide release factors (RFs). A large set of prokaryotic RFs differing in stop codon specificity, RF1 for UAG and UAA, and RF2 for UGA and UAA, was analyzed by means of a recently developed computational method allowing identification of the specificity-determining positions (SDPs) in families composed of proteins with similar but not identical function. Fifteen SDPs were identified within the RF1/2 superdomain II/IV known to be implicated in stop codon decoding. Three of these SDPs had particularly high scores. Five residues invariant for RF1 and RF2 [invariant amino acid residues (IRs)] were spatially clustered with the highest-scoring SDPs that in turn were located in two zones within the SDP/IR area. Zone 1 (domain II) included PxT and SPF motifs identified earlier by others as 'discriminator tripeptides'. We suggest that IRs in this zone take part in the recognition of U, the first base of all stop codons. Zone 2 (domain IV) possessed two SDPs with the highest scores not identified earlier. Presumably, they also take part in stop codon binding and discrimination. Elucidation of potential functional role(s) of the newly identified SDP/IR zones requires further experiments.     

第一类肽链释放因子C端结构域参与调控终止密码子的识别过程

真核生物蛋白质翻译终止过程中,第一类肽链释放因子（eukaryotic polypeptide release factor, eRF1）利用其N端结构域识别终止密码子。eRF1的N结构域中的GTS、NIKS和YxCxxxF模体对于终止密码子的识别发挥重要作用。但至目前为止,eRF1识别终止密码子的机制,尤其是对于终止密码子的选择性识别机制仍不清楚。我们构建了四膜虫（Tetrahymena thermophilia）eRF1的N端结构域与酿酒酵母（Saccharomyces cerevisiae）或裂殖酵母（Schizosaccharomyces pombe）eRF1的M和C结构域组成的杂合eRF1,即Tt/Sc eRF1 和Tt/Sp eRF1。双荧光素酶检测结果证实,两种杂合eRF1在细胞中识别终止密码子的活性具有显著差异。Tt/Sc eRF1仅识别UGA密码子,与四膜虫eRF1一致,具有密码子识别特异性;而Tt/Sp eRF1可以识别3个终止密码子,无密码子识别特异性。为解释这一现象,将Sp eRF1的C结构域中的1个关键的小结构域中的氨基酸进行突变,与Sc eRF1相应位点的氨基酸一致。分析结果显示,突变体Tt/Sp eRF1识别密码子UAA和UAG的性质发生显著变化,说明第一类肽链释放因子的C端结构域参与了终止密码子的识别过程。这提示,四膜虫eRF1识别终止密码子的特异性可能依赖于eRF1分子内的结构域间相互作用。本研究结果为揭示肽链释放因子识别终止密码子的分子机制提供了数据支持。     

四膜虫eRF1识别终止密码子的功能结构域

原生动物的一些纤毛虫中终止密码子发生重分配现象,将1个或2个终止密码子翻译为氨基酸.目前对这一现象的发生机制仍无合理解释．近年来,对蛋白质合成终止过程中肽链释放因子(eukaryotic polypeptide release factor, eRF)结构和功能的深入研究,为揭示终止密码子的重分配机制提供了重要的线索．本实验以具有终止密码子识别特异性的四膜虫Tt-eRF1为研究对象,将其中与密码子识别有关的GTx、NIKS和Y-C-F关键模体(motif) 引入识别通用终止密码子的酵母Sc=eRF1中,构建成各种嵌合体eRF1．利用双荧光素酶报告系统和细胞活性实验,分析关键模体及其周边的氨基酸对eRF1识别终止密码子性质的影响．结果表明,GTx和NIKS模体一定程度上决定eRF1识别终止密码子第1位碱基U和第2位碱基A;Y-C-F模体决定eRF1识别终止密码子UGA的第2位碱基G．模体内及其相邻氨基酸定点突变分析进一步支持以上结果．本研究推测,eRF1在进化过程中一些关键模体结构的改变决定其识别终止密码子的特异性,只能识别3个终止密码子中的1个或2个．随后,由于tRNA基因的突变产生阻抑性tRNA,促成终止密码子在原生动物纤毛虫中的重新分配．     

Bacterial polypeptide release factor RF2 is structurally distinct from eukaryotic eRF1.

Bacterial release factor RF2 promotes termination of protein synthesis, specifically recognizing stop codons UAA or UGA. The crystal structure of Escherichia coli RF2 has been determined to a resolution of 1.8 A. RF2 is structurally distinct from its eukaryotic counterpart eRF1. The tripeptide SPF motif, thought to confer RF2 stop codon specificity, and the universally conserved GGQ motif, proposed to be involved with the peptidyl transferase center, are exposed in loops only 23 A apart, and the structure suggests that stop signal recognition is more complex than generally believed.     

A tripeptide discriminator for stop codon recognition

Only recently has it been established that a tripeptide in the bacterial release factors (RFs), RF1 and RF2, is responsible for the stop codon recognition. This functional mimic of the anticodon of tRNA is referred to as a tripeptide 'anticodon' or a tripeptide discriminator. Here we review the experimental background and process leading to this discovery, and strengthen functional evidence for the tripeptide determinant for deciphering stop codons in mRNAs in prokaryotes.     

How does <Emphasis Type="Italic">Euplotes</Emphasis> translation termination factor eRF1 fail to recognize the UGA stop codon?

Class 1 eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) recognizes all three stop codons (UAA, UAG, and UGA) in standard-code organisms. In some ciliates with variant genetic codes, one or two stop codons are used to encode amino acids and are not recognized by eRF1; e.g., UAA and UAG are reassigned to Gln in Stylonychia and UGA is reassigned to Cys in Euplotes. Stop codon recognition is due to the N-terminal domain of eRF1 in standard-code organisms. Since variant-code ciliates most likely originate from universal-code ancestors, the N-domain sequence of their eRF1 was assumed to harbor the residues that are responsible for the changes in stop codon recognition specificity. To identify the N-domain regions determining the UGA-only specificity of Euplotes aediculatus eRF1, chimeric proteins were constructed by swapping various N-domain fragments of the E. aediculatus for their human counterparts; the MC domain was from human eRF1. Functional analysis of the chimeric eRF1 in vivo revealed two regions (residues 38–50 and 123–145) restricting the E. aediculatus eRF1 specificity to UAR. The change in stop codon recognition specificity of eRF1 was regarded as the first step in the origin of the variant genetic code in ciliates.     

Structure of a human translation termination complex

In contrast to bacteria that have two release factors, RF1 and RF2, eukaryotes only possess one unrelated release factor eRF1, which recognizes all three stop codons of the mRNA and hydrolyses the peptidyl-tRNA bond. While the molecular basis for bacterial termination has been elucidated, high-resolution structures of eukaryotic termination complexes have been lacking. Here we present a 3.8 Å structure of a human translation termination complex with eRF1 decoding a UAA(A) stop codon. The complex was formed using the human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) stalling peptide, which perturbs the peptidyltransferase center (PTC) to silence the hydrolysis activity of eRF1. Moreover, unlike sense codons or bacterial stop codons, the UAA stop codon adopts a U-turn-like conformation within a pocket formed by eRF1 and the ribosome. Inducing the U-turn conformation for stop codon recognition rationalizes how decoding by eRF1 includes monitoring geometry in order to discriminate against sense codons.     

Distinct eRF3 requirements suggest alternate eRF1 conformations mediate peptide release during eukaryotic translation termination

Organisms that use the standard genetic code recognize UAA, UAG, and UGA as stop codons, whereas variant code species frequently alter this pattern of stop codon recognition. We previously demonstrated that a hybrid eRF1 carrying the Euplotes octocarinatus domain 1 fused to Saccharomyces cerevisiae domains 2 and 3 (Eo/Sc eRF1) recognized UAA and UAG, but not UGA, as stop codons. In the current study, we identified mutations in Eo/Sc eRF1 that restore UGA recognition and define distinct roles for the TASNIKS and YxCxxxF motifs in eRF1 function. Mutations in or near the YxCxxxF motif support the cavity model for stop codon recognition by eRF1. Mutations in the TASNIKS motif eliminated the eRF3 requirement for peptide release at UAA and UAG codons, but not UGA codons. These results suggest that the TASNIKS motif and eRF3 function together to trigger eRF1 conformational changes that couple stop codon recognition and peptide release during eukaryotic translation termination.     

Connection between stop codon reassignment and frequent use of shifty stop frameshifting

Ciliated protozoa of the genus Euplotes have undergone genetic code reassignment, redefining the termination codon UGA to encode cysteine. In addition, Euplotes spp. genes very frequently employ shifty stop frameshifting. Both of these phenomena involve noncanonical events at a termination codon, suggesting they might have a common cause. We recently demonstrated that Euplotes octocarinatus peptide release factor eRF1 ignores UGA termination codons while continuing to recognize UAA and UAG. Here we show that both the Tetrahymena thermophila and E. octocarinatus eRF1 factors allow efficient frameshifting at all three termination codons, suggesting that UGA redefinition also impaired UAA/UAG recognition. Mutations of the Euplotes factor restoring a phylogenetically conserved motif in eRF1 (TASNIKS) reduced programmed frameshifting at all three termination codons. Mutation of another conserved residue, Cys124, strongly reduces frameshifting at UGA while actually increasing frameshifting at UAA/UAG. We will discuss these results in light of recent biochemical characterization of these mutations.     

Evolution of the translation termination factors

During of protein synthesis, or translation, four stages are usually recognized: initiation, elongation, termination, and recycling. Translation termination involves two protein types, the factors of termination of the first class participate in recognition of stop-codons and the termination factors of the second class are GTP-ases, which stimulate activity of the first class factors. Bacteria have two proteins of class 1, RF1 and RF2 (release factor), with overlapping codon specificity; both factors are capable to recognize the codon UAA, while the codons UAG and UGA are only decoded by RF1 and RF2, respectively. In addition, bacteria contain one factor of class 2, RF3, which not only stimulates activity of RF1 and RF2, but also promotes release of the first class factors after completion of termination. In contrast to prokaryotes, eukaryotic organisms have only one termination factor of class 1, eRF1. This protein recognizes each of the three stop-codons, which results in hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA. Eukaryotic cells also have only one factor of class 2, eRF3.     

Thermodynamic and Kinetic Insights into Stop Codon Recognition by Release Factor 1

Stop codon recognition is a crucial event during translation termination and is performed by class I release factors (RF1 and RF2 in bacterial cells). Recent crystal structures showed that stop codon recognition is achieved mainly through a network of hydrogen bonds and stacking interactions between the stop codon and conserved residues in domain II of RF1/RF2. Additionally, previous studies suggested that recognition of stop codons is coupled to proper positioning of RF1 on the ribosome, which is essential for triggering peptide release. In this study we mutated four conserved residues in Escherichia coli RF1 (Gln185, Arg186, Thr190, and Thr198) that are proposed to be critical for discriminating stop codons from sense codons. Our thermodynamic and kinetic analysis of these RF1 mutants showed that the mutations inhibited the binding of RF1 to the ribosome. However, the mutations in RF1 did not affect the rate of peptide release, showing that imperfect recognition of the stop codon does not affect the proper positioning of RF1 on the ribosome.     

Relationships Among Stop Codon Usage Bias, Its Context, Isochores, and Gene Expression Level in Various Eukaryotes

It is well known that stop codons play a critical role in the process of protein synthesis. However, little effort has been made to investigate whether stop codon usage exhibits biases, such as widely seen for synonymous codon usage. Here we systematically investigate stop codon usage bias in various eukaryotes as well as its relationships with its context, GC3 content, gene expression level, and secondary structure. The results show that there is a strong bias for stop codon usage in different eukaryotes, i.e., UAA is overrepresented in the lower eukaryotes, UGA is overrepresented in the higher eukaryotes, and UAG is least used in all eukaryotes. Different conserved patterns for each stop codon in different eukaryotic classes are found based on information content and logo analysis. GC3 contents increase with increasing complexity of organisms. Secondary structure prediction revealed that UAA is generally associated with loop structures, whereas UGA is more uniformly present in loop and stem structures, i.e., UGA is less biased toward having a particular structure. The stop codon usage bias, however, shows no significant relationship with GC3 content and gene expression level in individual eukaryotes. The results indicate that genomic complexity and GC3 content might contribute to stop codon usage bias in different eukaryotes. Our results indicate that stop codons, like synonymous codons, exhibit biases in usage. Additional work will be needed to understand the causes of these biases and their relationship to the mechanism of protein termination. [Reviewing Editor: Dr. Manyuan Long]     

肽链释放因子识别终止密码子的机制

肽链释放因子(polypeptide release factor, RF)是参与细胞内蛋白质合成终止过程中新生肽链释放的一组重要的蛋白质,包括两类,即第一类肽链释放因子(classⅠrelease factor, RFⅠ)和第二类肽链释放因子(classⅡrelease factor, RFⅡ).关于第一类肽链释放因子识别终止密码子的机制和功能位点是目前分子细胞生物学领域的一个研究热点,第二类肽链释放因子作为一类GTP酶,在第一类肽链释放因子识别终止密码子和肽链释放过程中的协同作用也备受关注.近些年来,通过构建体内和体外的测活体系,对第一类肽链释放因子识别终止密码子的机制的研究取得了一些进展,提出了多种假说和模型,尤其是对第一类肽链释放因子的晶体结构及两类肽链释放因子复合体的空间结构的研究,为揭示真核生物细胞内蛋白质合成终止机制提供了直接的证据.     

Recognition of the amber UAG stop codon by release factor RF1

We report the crystal structure of a termination complex containing release factor RF1 bound to the 70S ribosome in response to an amber (UAG) codon at 3.6‐Å resolution. The amber codon is recognized in the 30S subunit‐decoding centre directly by conserved elements of domain 2 of RF1, including T186 of the PVT motif. Together with earlier structures, the mechanisms of recognition of all three stop codons by release factors RF1 and RF2 can now be described. Our structure confirms that the backbone amide of Q230 of the universally conserved GGQ motif is positioned to contribute directly to the catalysis of the peptidyl‐tRNA hydrolysis reaction through stabilization of the leaving group and/or transition state. We also observe synthetic‐negative interactions between mutations in the switch loop of RF1 and in helix 69 of 23S rRNA, revealing that these structural features interact functionally in the termination process. These findings are consistent with our proposal that structural rearrangements of RF1 and RF2 are critical to accurate translation termination.     

Stop codon recognition and interactions with peptide release factor RF3 of truncated and chimeric RF1 and RF2 from Escherichia coli

Release factors RF1 and RF2 recognize stop codons present at the A-site of the ribosome and activate hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA to release the peptide chain. Interactions with RF3, a ribosome-dependent GTPase, then initiate a series of reactions that accelerate the dissociation of RF1 or RF2 and their recycling between ribosomes. Two regions of Escherichia coli RF1 and RF2 were identified previously as involved in stop codon recognition and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. We show here that removing the N-terminal domain of RF1 or RF2 or exchanging this domain between the two factors does not affect RF specificity but has different effects on the activity of RF1 and RF2: truncated RF1 remains highly active and able to support rapid cell growth, whereas cells with truncated RF2 grow only poorly. Transplanting a loop of 13 amino acid residues from RF2 to RF1 switches the stop codon specificity. The interaction of the truncated factors with RF3 on the ribosome is defective: they fail to stimulate guanine nucleotide exchange on RF3, recycling is not stimulated by RF3, and nucleotide-free RF3 fails to stabilize the binding of RF1 or RF2 to the ribosome. However, the N-terminal domain seems not to be required for the expulsion of RF1 or RF2 by RF3:GTP.     

Distinct paths to stop codon reassignment by the variant-code organisms Tetrahymena and Euplotes

The reassignment of stop codons is common among many ciliate species. For example, Tetrahymena species recognize only UGA as a stop codon, while Euplotes species recognize only UAA and UAG as stop codons. Recent studies have shown that domain 1 of the translation termination factor eRF1 mediates stop codon recognition. While it is commonly assumed that changes in domain 1 of ciliate eRF1s are responsible for altered stop codon recognition, this has never been demonstrated in vivo. To carry out such an analysis, we made hybrid proteins that contained eRF1 domain 1 from either Tetrahymena thermophila or Euplotes octocarinatus fused to eRF1 domains 2 and 3 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that the Tetrahymena hybrid eRF1 efficiently terminated at all three stop codons when expressed in yeast cells, indicating that domain 1 is not the sole determinant of stop codon recognition in Tetrahymena species. In contrast, the Euplotes hybrid facilitated efficient translation termination at UAA and UAG codons but not at the UGA codon. Together, these results indicate that while domain 1 facilitates stop codon recognition, other factors can influence this process. Our findings also indicate that these two ciliate species used distinct approaches to diverge from the universal genetic code.     

The function, structure and regulation of E. coli peptide chain release factors

The termination of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli depends upon the soluble protein factors RF1 or RF2. RF1 catalyzes UAG and UAA dependent termination, while RF2 catalyzes UGA and UAA dependent termination. The proteins have been purified to homogeneity, their respective genes isolated, and their primary structures deduced from the DNA sequences. The sequences reveal considerable conserved homology, presumably reflecting functional similarities and a common ancestral origin. The RFs are encoded as single copy genes on the bacterial chromosome. RF2 exhibits autogenous regulation in an in vitro translation system. The mechanism of autoregulation appears to be an in-frame UGA stop codon that requires a 1+ frameshift for the continued synthesis of the protein. Frameshifting prior to the inframe stop codon occurs at a remarkably high frequency by an unknown mechanism. Future studies will be directed at understanding how RFs interact with the ribosomal components, and further defining the mechanism of RF2 frameshifting.     

Termination of translation in bacteria may be modulated via specific interaction between peptide chain release factor 2 and the last peptidyl-tRNA(Ser/Phe).

The 5' context of 671 Escherichia coli stop codons UGA and UAA has been compared with the context of stop-like codons (UAC, UAU and CAA for UAA; UGG, UGC, UGU and CGA for UGA). We have observed highly significant deviations from the expected nucleotide distribution: adenine is over-represented whereas pyrimidines are under-represented in position -2 upstream from UAA. Uridine is over-represented in position -3 upstream from UGA. Lysine codons are preferable immediately prior to UAA. A complete set of codons for serine and the phenylalanine UUC codon are preferable immediately 5' to UGA. This non-random codon distribution before stop codons could be considered as a molecular device for modulation of translation termination. We have found that certain fragment of E. coli release factor 2 (RF2) (amino acids 93-114) is similar to the amino acid sequences of seryl-tRNA synthetase (positions 10-19 and 80-93) and of beta (small) subunit (positions 72-94) of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase from E. coli. Three-dimensional structure of E. coli seryl-tRNA synthetase is known [1]: Its N-terminus represents an antiparallel alpha-helical coiled-coil domain and contains a region homologous to RF2. On the basis of the above-mentioned results we assume that a specific interaction between RF2 and the last peptidyl-tRNA(Ser/Phe) occurs during polypeptide chain termination in prokaryotic ribosomes.