Diagnosing cancer in general practice: when is cancer suspected?

Of 10,278 encounters with patients recorded by 33 general practitioners in a defined Norwegian population during a two month period, 429 (4.2%) were classified as resulting in a follow up for suspected cancer. The patient''s fear of cancer was the most important indicator of suspicion of cancer among the doctors. Patients who consulted for digestive and gynaecological problems were most frequently suspected of having cancer. Comparing the pattern of suspicion of cancer with the incidence of cancer in the area showed a relative oversuspicion in young patients and women.     

Screening for asymptomatic bowel cancer in general practice.

General practitioners screened 4284 asymptomatic people aged over 40 to compare the incidence of large bowel cancer and polyps with a control general practice (4288 patients). Compliance was best in young women (60%), and overall it was 42%. Twenty six patients who had a positive Haemoccult test result (1.5% of those screened) were examined by colonoscopy and 10 had polyps. The incidence of cancers in the two groups was similar but in the control (unscreened patients) practice no polyps were found.     

Entry to general practice training.

Since 1979 general practitioner trainees in the North West Region of England have been assessed on knowledge and ability by several tests, including the multiple choice test. Trainers in the region require a score in the MCQ of 45% before taking a trainee into the practice. More British graduates have achieved this score than overseas graduates. The difference was statistically significant. Only applicants who show adequate factual recall should be appointed as trainees.     

Adverse reactions to drugs in general practice.

Of 817 patients in a general-practice survey of adverse reactions to drugs, 41% were thought to have "certainly" or "probably" had a reaction to the drug prescribed. Adverse effects on the gastrointestinal and central nervous systems were the most frequently reported, and 90% of reactions had occurred by the fourth day of treatment. More patients given drugs acting on the central nervous system and antihistamines reported reactions than those in other categories. A higher incidence of adverse drug effects is shown in this general-practice survey than in other, mainly hospital-based, surveys. Further intensive surveillance for adverse effects of drugs is recommended to provide additional information on the burden of drug-induced disease in the community.     

Referrals from general practice to hospital outpatient departments: a strategy for improvement.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the appropriateness of referrals from general practice to hospital outpatient departments. DESIGN--Prospective audit of referrals from a group practice over one year. SETTING--Six handed practice in a southern coastal town. SUBJECTS--All patients referred during the study period for whom a copy of the referral letter was available. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--The investigations carried out by the consultant that led to the diagnosis; the diagnosis reached; and the management. RESULTS--Of roughly 3000 patients referred during the year, 277 with various skin and soft tissue disorders could probably have been managed solely by the general practitioner. Referrals for cryotherapy (96 in this series) and diabetes (19) could probably also have been avoided by specialist training of the general practitioner. In addition, in cases of haematuria and prostatic hypertrophy (34 and 22 referrals) substantial time could have been saved for both the patient and the consultant had the general practitioner supplied the results of relevant investigations. Probably the most important outcome was the model that the study offered for other general practitioners to improve the appropriateness of referrals. CONCLUSION--This approach to determining the appropriateness of referrals benefits the general practitioners, the consultant, and the patient.     

Disability as identified from general practice records.

Thirty eight doctors who attended a postgraduate educational course provided information about disabled patients identified in a search of 7000 records. Disablement was defined as a major disruption to the normal lifestyle of patients in appropriate age and sex groups. Altogether 242 people were identified as disabled, equivalent to 32 per 1000 population, which is closely similar to that published by Harris, who identified patients by postal questionnaire. Among adults aged 15 to 64 more men were identified than women, and we suggest that a higher rate of disablement might be expected in men. Disablement among women may be underestimated because of underrecognition by doctors of disability in housewives. Fifty two per cent of all disabled people were able to attend the doctor''s surgery, and 72% were receiving regular medication; 79% were dependent on relatives, but only 30% were dependent on statutory services. In the opinion of the recording doctors medical and nursing needs were well met, though not the social needs, where the importance of living alone is noteworthy.