Effect of postal prompts to patients and general practitioners on the quality of primary care after a coronary event (POST): randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesTo determine whether postal prompts to patients who have survived an acute coronary event and to their general practitioners improve secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.DesignRandomised controlled trial.Setting52 general practices in east London, 44 of which had received facilitation of local guidelines for coronary heart disease.Participants328 patients admitted to hospital for myocardial infarction or unstable angina.InterventionsPostal prompts sent 2 weeks and 3 months after discharge from hospital. The prompts contained recommendations for lowering the risk of another coronary event, including changes to lifestyle, drug treatment, and making an appointment to discuss these issues with the general practitioner or practice nurse.ResultsPrescribing of β bockers (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 0.8 to 3.0, P>0.05) and cholesterol lowering drugs (1.7, 0.8 to 3.4, P>0.05) did not differ between intervention and control groups. A higher proportion of patients in the intervention group (64%) than in the control group (38%) had their serum cholesterol concentrations measured (2.9, 1.5 to 5.5, P<0.001). Secondary outcomes were significantly improved for consultations for coronary heart disease, the recording of risk factors, and advice given. There were no significant differences in patients’ self reported changes to lifestyle or to the belief that it is possible to modify the risk of another coronary event.ConclusionsPostal prompts to patients who had had acute coronary events and to their general practitioners in a locality where guidelines for coronary heart disease had been disseminated did not improve prescribing of effective drugs for secondary prevention or self reported changes to lifestyle. The prompts did increase consultation rates related to coronary heart disease and the recording of risk factors in the practices. Effective secondary prevention of coronary heart disease requires more than postal prompts and the dissemination of guidelines.

Key messages

• Postal prompts to patients and their general practitioners about effective secondary prevention after a myocardial infarction did not improve the prescribing of cholesterol lowering drugs and β blockers
• The prompts did improve general practice recording of cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle advice given to patients, but they made no difference to patients’ reports of changes to lifestyle
• Other methods are needed to improve the quality of secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in general practice

     

Improving the health behaviours of elderly people: randomised controlled trial of a general practice education programme

ObjectivesTo establish the effect of an educational intervention for general practitioners on the health behaviours and wellbeing of elderly patients.DesignRandomised controlled trial with 1 year follow up.SettingMetropolitan general practices in Melbourne, Australia.Subjects42 general practitioners and 267 of their patients aged over 65 years.InterventionEducational and clinical practice audit programme for general practitioners on health promotion for elderly people.ResultsPatients in the intervention group had increased (a) walking by an average of 88 minutes per fortnight, (b) frequency of pleasurable activities, and (c) self rated health compared with the control group. No change was seen in drug usage, rate of influenza vaccination, functional status, or psychological wellbeing as a result of the intervention. Extrapolations of the known effect of these changes in behaviour suggest mortality could be reduced by 22% if activity was sustained for 5 years.ConclusionsEducation of the general practitioners had a positive effect on health outcomes of their elderly patients. General practitioners may have considerable public health impact in promotion of health for elderly patients.

Key messages

• Few educational interventions for doctors have shown benefit to the health of patients
• Elderly people were identified in the UK health initiatives as in need of additional attention, and levels of health protective behaviours were low in community surveys
• A multifaceted educational intervention for general practitioners was effective in improving walking behaviour, self rated health status, and the frequency of social contacts in elderly patients
• General practitioners are effective in improving health and health behaviours in their elderly patients

     

Cross sectional study of reporting of epileptic seizures to general practitioners

ObjectiveComparison of reporting of recent epileptic seizures by patients to a doctor and anonymously.DesignCross sectional study of patients with epilepsy by comparison of paired questionnaires.SettingRural and urban general practices in Norfolk. Participants122 patients aged over 16 years and able to self complete a questionnaire who were recruited by 31 general practitioners when attending for review of their epilepsy.Results18 patients failed to report a seizure in the past year to their general practitioner (uncontrolled epilepsy). 40% (24/60) of people with epilepsy who anonymously reported a seizure in the past year held a driving licence, but only six revealed this to their general practitioner. The unemployment rate was 34%, substantially higher than the 9% in the general population. Measures of anxiety, depression, and stigmatisation were higher in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy.ConclusionsA significant proportion of patients with epilepsy underreport their seizures. Recognition of underreporting is important if patients are to benefit from adequate and appropriate treatment. General practitioners'' ability to treat epilepsy is hampered by their role in regulating the rights of epileptic patients to hold a driving licence or access certain occupations.

Key messages

• People with epilepsy may be reluctant to report seizures to their general practitioners as epilepsy affects their eligibility for a driving licence and access to various employment and leisure activities
• In this study about a sixth of patients anonymously reported seizures in the past year which they had not revealed to their general practitioner
• 40% of patients who anonymously reported a seizure in the past year held a driving licence, but only a quarter of these admitted this to their general practitioner
• People who had had seizures in the past year were significantly more depressed and felt more stigmatised than those who had not had a seizure
• Underreporting of seizures has important consequences for treatment, and doctors need to put more effort into explaining this to patients

     

Effectiveness of teaching general practitioners skills in brief cognitive behaviour therapy to treat patients with depression: randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of teaching general practitioners skills in brief cognitive behaviour therapy.DesignParallel group, cluster randomised, controlled trial of an educational package on cognitive behaviour therapy.SettingGeneral practices in north London.Participants84 general practitioner principals and 272 patients attending their practices who scored above the threshold for psychological distress on the hospital anxiety and depression scale.InterventionA training package of four half days on brief cognitive behaviour therapy.ResultsDoctors'' knowledge of depression and attitudes towards its treatment showed no major difference between intervention and control groups after 6 months. The training had no discernible impact on patients'' outcomes.ConclusionGeneral practitioners may require more training and support than a basic educational package on brief cognitive behaviour therapy to acquire skills to help patients with depression.

What is already known on this topic

Trained professionals can deliver effective cognitive behaviour therapy to depressed patients presenting to general practitionersLimited evidence shows that cognitive behaviour therapy is effective when delivered by general practitioners who have received extensive instructionMost doctors do not have the time or inclination to carry out such comprehensive training

What this study adds

Basic training in brief cognitive behaviour therapy has little effect on general practitioners'' attitudes to the identification and treatment of depression or the outcome of their patients with emotional problemsGeneral practitioners may require more extensive training and support if they are to acquire skills in brief cognitive behaviour therapy that will have a positive impact on their patients     

The Norwegian naturalistic treatment study of depression in general practice (NORDEP)-I: randomised double blind study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of emotional support and counselling combined with placebo or antidepressants with single or dual mechanism of action in the treatment of depression in primary care.DesignRandomised double blind study.SettingSeveral locations in Norway.Subjects372 patients with depression.Results Intention to treat analyses showed 47% remission in patients randomised to placebo compared with 61% remission in patients randomised to sertraline (odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.96) and 54% in patients randomised to mianserin (0.75, 0.44 to 1.27). Women responded better than men (1.86, 1.17 to 2.96). Subgroup analyses showed that subjects with recurrent depression (n=273) responded more frequently to sertraline than to placebo (0.43, 0.23 to 0.82) than those having their first episode of depression (1.18, 0.39 to 3.61). Statistically significant interactions between type of drug treatment and history of depression were not shown by logistic regression.Conclusion The combination of active drug and simple psychological treatment (counselling, emotional support, and close follow up over a 24 week period) was more effective than simple psychological treatment alone, in particular for those with recurrent depression. Overall, women may benefit more than men. If confirmed in future studies, the findings should lead to more differentiated treatment guidelines for depression in primary care.

Key messages

• The effectiveness of simple psychological treatment and active drug provided by general practitioners is comparable to treatment results reported by psychiatrists and clinical psychologists
• Treatment benefits women more than men
• There may be differences in response to treatment depending on the nature of depression
• A 6 month treatment period is necessary to evaluate effectiveness of treatments for depression in general practice
• The development of more differentiated treatment guidelines for depression in primary care is needed

     

Retrospective analysis of census data on general practitioners who qualified in South Asia: who will replace them as they retire?

ObjectivesTo determine the number and geographical distribution of general practitioners in the NHS who qualified medically in South Asia and to project their numbers as they retire.DesignRetrospective analysis of yearly data and projection of future trends.SettingEngland and Wales.SubjectsGeneral practitioners who qualified medically in the countries of Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka and who were practising in the NHS on 1 October 1992.Results4192 of 25 333 (16.5%) of all unrestricted general practitioners practising full time on 1 October 1992 qualified in South Asian medical schools. The proportion varied by health authority from 0.007% to 56.5%. Roughly two thirds who were practising in 1992 will have retired by 2007; in some health authorities this will represent a loss of one in four general practitioners. The practices that these doctors will leave seem to be in relatively deprived areas as measured by deprivation payments and a health authority measure of population need.ConclusionMany general practitioners who qualified in South Asian medical schools will retire within the next decade. The impact will vary greatly by health authority. Those health authorities with the greatest number of such doctors are in some of the most deprived areas in the United Kingdom and have experienced the most difficulty in filling vacancies. Various responses will be required by workforce planners to mitigate the impact of these retirements.

Key messages

• Currently, one in six general practitioners practising full time in the NHS qualified medically in a South Asian medical school; two thirds are likely to retire by 2007
• It is unlikely that doctors who qualify in South Asia will be a source of general practice recruitment in the future
• The posts from which South Asian qualifiers are retiring may be more difficult to fill because they are often in practices in areas of higher need
• There is extreme variation in the proportion of total general practitioners who are South Asian qualifiers; flexibility for policy responses should be maintained

     

Randomised controlled trial of the READER method of critical appraisal in general practice

Objective: To evaluate the READER model for critical reading by comparing it with a free appraisal, and to explore what factors influence different components of the model. Design: A randomised controlled trial in which two groups of general practitioners assessed three papers from the general practice section of the BMJ. Setting: Northern Ireland. Subjects: 243 general practitioners. Main outcome measures: Scores given using the READER model (Relevance, Education, Applicability, Discrimination, overall Evaluation) and scores given using a free appraisal for scientific quality and an overall total. Results: The hierarchical order for the three papers was different for the two groups, according to the total scores. Participants using the READER method (intervention group) gave a significantly lower total score (P⩽0.01) and a lower score for the scientific quality (P⩽0.0001) for all three papers. Overall more than one in five (22%), and more men than women, read more than 5 articles a month (P⩽0.05). Those who were trainers tended to read more articles (P⩽0.05), and no trainers admitted to reading none. Overall, 58% (135/234) (68% (76/112) of the intervention group) believed that taking part in the exercise would encourage them to be more critical of published articles in the future (P⩽0.01). Conclusion: Participants using the READER model gave a consistently lower overall score and applied a more appropriate appraisal to the methodology of the studies. The method was both accurate and repeatable. No intrinsic factors influenced the scores, so the model is appropriate for use by all general practitioners regardless of their seniority, location, teaching or training experience, and the number of articles they read regularly.

Key messages

• The READER method of critical appraisal is simple and easy to apply
• The method is accurate and repeatable
• General practitioners using a structured appraisal are more critical of quality
• The model may be used by general practitioners with different backgrounds, seniority, and experience of teaching and training

     

Endpiece: Ideas must be comforting

ObjectivesTo explore general practitioners’ perceptions of effective health care and its application in their own practice; to examine how these perceptions relate to assumptions about clinicians’ values and behaviour implicit in the evidence based medicine approach.DesignA qualitative study using semistructured interviews.SettingEight general practices in North Thames region that were part of the Medical Research Council General Practice Research Framework.Participants24 general practitioners, three from each practice.ResultsThree categories of definitions emerged: clinical, patient related, and resource related. Patient factors were the main reason given for not practising effectively; others were lack of time, doctors’ lack of knowledge and skills, lack of resources, and “human failings.” Main sources of information used in situations of clinical uncertainty were general practitioner partners and hospital doctors. Contact with hospital doctors and observation of hospital practice were just as likely as information from medical and scientific literature to bring about changes in clinical practice.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that the central assumptions of the evidence based medicine paradigm may not be shared by many general practitioners, making its application in general practice problematic. The promotion of effective care in general practice requires a broader vision and a more pragmatic approach which takes account of practitioners’ concerns and is compatible with the complex nature of their work.

Key messages

• Evidence based medicine has emerged as a new paradigm to prevent inappropriate variations in clinical practice
• This study explored the extent to which evidence based medicine’s emphasis on clinical effectiveness, self analysis, and information seeking is congruent with the modes of thinking and behaviour of general practitioners
• General practitioners’ definitions of effective health care fell into three categories of clinical, patient related, and resource related; their main reason for not practising effectively was patient factors, and others were lack of time, lack of knowledge and skills, lack of resources, and “human failings”; and their main sources of information in cases of clinical uncertainty were general practitioner partners and hospital doctors
• The central assumptions of the evidence based medicine paradigm may not be shared by many general practitioners, making its application in general practice problematic
• Promotion of effective care in general practice requires a broader vision and a more pragmatic approach that takes account of practitioners’ concerns and is compatible with the complex nature of their work

     

Prescribing new drugs: qualitative study of influences on consultants and general practitioners

ObjectiveTo explore consultants'' and general practitioners'' perceptions of the factors that influence their decisions to introduce new drugs into their clinical practice.DesignQualitative study using semistructured interviews. Monitoring of hospital and general practice prescribing data for eight new drugs.SettingTeaching hospital and nearby general hospital plus general practices in Birmingham.Participants38 consultants and 56 general practitioners who regularly referred to the teaching hospital.ResultsConsultants usually prescribed new drugs only in their specialty, used few new drugs, and used scientific evidence to inform their decisions. General practitioners generally prescribed more new drugs and for a wider range of conditions, but their approach varied considerably both between general practitioners and between drugs for the same general practitioner. Drug company representatives were an important source of information for general practitioners. Prescribing data were consistent with statements made by respondents.ConclusionsThe factors influencing the introduction of new drugs, particularly in primary care, are more multiple and complex than suggested by early theories of drug innovation. Early experience of using a new drug seems to strongly influence future use.

What is already known on this topic

UK studies show that use of new drugs by general practitioners is influenced by consultants, the nature of the drug, and perceived risk

What this study adds

Consultants generally introduced fewer drugs than general practitioners, usually within their specialtyDecisions were said to be based mainly on the evidence from the scientific literature and meetingsGeneral practitioners prescribed more new drugs and the basis of decisions was more variedDoctors'' interpretations of using a new drug were not consistent     

Dramaturgical study of meetings between general practitioners and representatives of pharmaceutical companies

ObjectivesTo examine the interaction between general practitioners and pharmaceutical company representatives.DesignQualitative study of 13 consecutive meetings between general practitioner and pharmaceutical representatives. A dramaturgical model was used to inform analysis of the transcribed verbal interactions.SettingPractice in south west England.Participants13 pharmaceutical company representatives and one general practitioner.ResultsThe encounters were acted out in six scenes. Scene 1 was initiated by the pharmaceutical representative, who acknowledged the relative status of the two players. Scene 2 provided the opportunity for the representative to check the general practitioner''s knowledge about the product. Scene 3 was used to propose clinical and cost benefits associated with the product. During scene 4, the general practitioner took centre stage and challenged aspects of this information. Scene 5 involved a recovery strategy as the representative fought to regain equilibrium. In the final scene, the representative tried to ensure future contacts.ConclusionEncounters between general practitioners and pharmaceutical representatives follow a consistent format that is implicitly understood by each player. It is naive to suppose that pharmaceutical representatives are passive resources for drug information. General practitioners might benefit from someone who can provide unbiased information about prescribing in a manner that is supportive and sympathetic to the demands of practice.

What is already known on this topic

Pharmaceutical representatives influence physicians'' prescribing in ways that are often unacknowledged by the physicians themselvesMeetings with pharmaceutical representatives are associated with increased prescribing costs and less rational prescribing

What this study adds

Meetings between pharmaceutical representatives and general practitioners follow a consistent format that is implicitly understood by each playerGeneral practitioners may cooperate because representatives make them feel valued     

What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials

ObjectivesTo assess the methodological quality of intention to treat analysis as reported in randomised controlled trials in four large medical journals.DesignSurvey of all reports of randomised controlled trials published in 1997 in the BMJ, Lancet, JAMA, and New England Journal of Medicine.Results119 (48%) of the reports mentioned intention to treat analysis. Of these, 12 excluded any patients who did not start the allocated intervention and three did not analyse all randomised subjects as allocated. Five reports explicitly stated that there were no deviations from random allocation. The remaining 99 reports seemed to analyse according to random allocation, but only 34 of these explicitly stated this. 89 (75%) trials had some missing data on the primary outcome variable. The methods used to deal with this were generally inadequate, potentially leading to a biased treatment effect. 29 (24%) trials had more than 10% of responses missing for the primary outcome, the methods of handling the missing responses were similar in this subset.ConclusionsThe intention to treat approach is often inadequately described and inadequately applied. Authors should explicitly describe the handling of deviations from randomised allocation and missing responses and discuss the potential effect of any missing response. Readers should critically assess the validity of reported intention to treat analyses.

Key messages

• Intention to treat gives a pragmatic estimate of the benefit of a change in treatment policy rather than of potential benefit in patients who receive treatment exactly as planned
• Full application of intention to treat is possible only when complete outcome data are available for all randomised subjects
• About half of all published reports of randomised controlled trials stated that intention to treat was used, but handling of deviations from randomised allocation varied widely
• Many trials had some missing data on the primary outcome variable, and methods used to deal with this were generally inadequate, potentially leading to bias
• Intention to treat analyses are often inadequately described and inadequately applied

     

Analysis of Chinese herbal creams prescribed for dermatological conditions

ObjectiveTo determine whether Chinese herbal creams used for the treatment of dermatological conditions contain steroids.Design11 herbal creams obtained from patients attending general and paediatric dermatology outpatient clinics were analysed with high resolution gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. SettingDepartments of dermatology and clinical biochemistry.ResultsEight creams contained dexamethasone at a mean concentration of 456 μg/g (range 64 to 1500 μg/g). All were applied to areas of sensitive skin such as face and flexures.ConclusionGreater regulation needs to be imposed on Chinese herbalists to prevent illegal and inappropriate prescribing of potent steroids.

Key messages

• Patients with eczema often report improvement with Chinese herbal creams
• There may be no indication on the label about the contents of the cream
• Eight of the 11 creams analysed contained dexamethasone at concentrations inappropriate for use on the face or in children
• Inadvertent use of topical steroids can cause severe exacerbation of eczema herpeticum
• Closer regulation of herbal medicines is required

     

Email submissions from outside the United Kingdom

ObjectivesTo identify whether psychiatric disturbance in parentally bereaved children and surviving parents is related to service provision.DesignProspective case-control study.SettingTwo adjacent outer London health authorities. Participants45 bereaved families with children aged 2 to 16 years.ResultsParentally bereaved children and surviving parents showed higher than expected levels of psychiatric difficulties. Boys were more affected than girls, and bereaved mothers had more mental health difficulties than bereaved fathers. Levels of psychiatric disturbance in children were higher when parents showed probable psychiatric disorder. Service provision related to the age of the children and the manner of parental death. Children under 5 years of age were less likely to be offered services than older children even though their parents desired it. Children were significantly more likely to be offered services when the parent had committed suicide or when the death was expected. Children least likely to receive service support were those who were not in touch with services before parental death.ConclusionsService provision was not significantly related to parental wishes or to level of psychiatric disturbance in parents or children. There is a role for general practitioners and primary care workers in identifying psychologically distressed surviving parents whose children may be psychiatrically disturbed, and referring them to appropriate services.

Key messages

• Parentally bereaved children show high levels of psychological disturbance, with boys being more vulnerable than girls
• Surviving mothers show more psychiatric morbidity than surviving fathers
• Psychological distress in bereaved parents is associated with psychological difficulties in their children
• Service provision for bereaved children is not determined by mental health difficulties in either parents or children, or by parental wishes; it is influenced only by the manner of parental death and the age of the child
• The mismatch between need and service provision indicates a role for general practitioners and primary care workers in identifying distressed or disturbed families in need of public or voluntary service help

     

The impact of removing financial incentives and/or audit and feedback on chlamydia testing in general practice: A cluster randomised controlled trial (ACCEPt-able)

BackgroundFinancial incentives and audit/feedback are widely used in primary care to influence clinician behaviour and increase quality of care. While observational data suggest a decline in quality when these interventions are stopped, their removal has not been evaluated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT), to our knowledge. This trial aimed to determine whether chlamydia testing in general practice is sustained when financial incentives and/or audit/feedback are removed.Methods and findingsWe undertook a 2 × 2 factorial cluster RCT in 60 general practices in 4 Australian states targeting 49,525 patients aged 16–29 years for annual chlamydia testing. Clinics were recruited between July 2014 and September 2015 and were followed for up to 2 years or until 31 December 2016. Clinics were eligible if they were in the intervention group of a previous cluster RCT where general practitioners (GPs) received financial incentives (AU$5–AU$8) for each chlamydia test and quarterly audit/feedback reports of their chlamydia testing rates. Clinics were randomised into 1 of 4 groups: incentives removed but audit/feedback retained (group A), audit/feedback removed but incentives retained (group B), both removed (group C), or both retained (group D). The primary outcome was the annual chlamydia testing rate among 16- to 29-year-old patients, where the numerator was the number who had at least 1 chlamydia test within 12 months and the denominator was the number who had at least 1 consultation during the same 12 months. We undertook a factorial analysis in which we investigated the effects of removal versus retention of incentives (groups A + C versus groups B + D) and the effects of removal versus retention of audit/feedback (group B + C versus groups A + D) separately. Of 60 clinics, 59 were randomised and 55 (91.7%) provided data (group A: 15 clinics, 11,196 patients; group B: 14, 11,944; group C: 13, 11,566; group D: 13, 14,819). Annual testing decreased from 20.2% to 11.7% (difference −8.8%; 95% CI −10.5% to −7.0%) in clinics with incentives removed and decreased from 20.6% to 14.3% (difference −7.1%; 95% CI −9.6% to −4.7%) where incentives were retained. The adjusted absolute difference in treatment effect was −0.9% (95% CI −3.5% to 1.7%; p = 0.2267). Annual testing decreased from 21.0% to 11.6% (difference −9.5%; 95% CI −11.7% to −7.4%) in clinics where audit/feedback was removed and decreased from 19.9% to 14.5% (difference −6.4%; 95% CI −8.6% to −4.2%) where audit/feedback was retained. The adjusted absolute difference in treatment effect was −2.6% (95% CI −5.4% to −0.1%; p = 0.0336). Study limitations included an unexpected reduction in testing across all groups impacting statistical power, loss of 4 clinics after randomisation, and inclusion of rural clinics only.ConclusionsAudit/feedback is more effective than financial incentives of AU$5–AU$8 per chlamydia test at sustaining GP chlamydia testing practices over time in Australian general practice.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12614000595617

In a cluster randomized trial, Jane S Hocking and colleagues investigate the impact of removing financial incentives and/or audit and feedback on chlamydia testing in general practice in Australia.     

Understanding the culture of prescribing: qualitative study of general practitioners’ and patients’ perceptions of antibiotics for sore throats

Objectives: To better understand reasons for antibiotics being prescribed for sore throats despite well known evidence that they are generally of little help. Design: Qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. Setting: General practices in South Wales. Subjects: 21 general practitioners and 17 of their patients who had recently consulted for a sore throat or upper respiratory tract infection. Main outcome measures: Subjects’ experience of management of the illness, patients’ expectations, beliefs about antibiotic treatment for sore throats, and ideas for reducing prescribing. Results: Doctors knew of the evidence for marginal effectiveness yet often prescribed for good relationships with patients. Possible patient benefit outweighed theoretical community risk from resistant bacteria. Most doctors found prescribing “against the evidence” uncomfortable and realised this probably increased workload. Explanations of the distinction between virus and bacterium often led to perceived confusion. Clinicians were divided on the value of leaflets and national campaigns, but several favoured patient empowerment for self care by other members of the primary care team. Patient expectations were seldom made explicit, and many were not met. A third of patients had a clear expectation for antibiotics, and mothers were more likely to accept non-antibiotic treatment for their children than for themselves. Satisfaction was not necessarily related to receiving antibiotics, with many seeking reassurance, further information, and pain relief. Conclusions: This prescribing decision is greatly influenced by considerations of the doctor-patient relationship. Consulting strategies that make patient expectations explicit without damaging relationships might reduce unwanted antibiotics. Repeating evidence for lack of effectiveness is unlikely to change doctors’ prescribing, but information about risk to individual patients might. Emphasising positive aspects of non-antibiotic treatment and lack of efficacy in general might be helpful.

Key messages

• Doctors know that antibiotics do not help most sore throat sufferers but try not to jeopardise relationships with patients over this issue
• Patients’ expectations are seldom explicit, and satisfaction is not necessarily related to receiving an antibiotic: information and reassurance are sometimes more important
• Consulting techniques that make expectations explicit, preserve relationships, and facilitate acceptable management are important
• Opportunities for empowering patients who are not acutely ill could be better used, and emphasising positive aspects of non-antibiotic treatment, especially in children, could be fruitful
• Risks to individuals from unnecessary antibiotics (rather than trial evidence for marginal benefit) should be emphasised

     

Multifaceted shared care intervention for late life depression in residential care: randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a population based, multifaceted shared care intervention for late life depression in residential care.DesignRandomised controlled trial, with control and intervention groups studied one after the other and blind follow up after 9.5 months.SettingPopulation of residential facility in Sydney living in self care units and hostels.Participants220 depressed residents aged ⩾65 without severe cognitive impairment.InterventionThe shared care intervention included: (a) multidisciplinary consultation and collaboration, (b) training of general practitioners and carers in detection and management of depression, and (c) depression related health education and activity programmes for residents. The control group received routine care.ResultsIntention to treat analysis was used. There was significantly more movement to “less depressed” levels of depression at follow up in the intervention than control group (Mantel-Haenszel stratification test, P=0.0125). Multiple linear regression analysis found a significant intervention effect after controlling for possible confounders, with the intervention group showing an average improvement of 1.87 points on the geriatric depression scale compared with the control group (95% confidence interval 0.76 to 2.97, P=0.0011).ConclusionsThe outcome of depression among elderly people in residential care can be improved by multidisciplinary collaboration, by enhancing the clinical skills of general practitioners and care staff, and by providing depression related health education and activity programmes for residents.

Key messages

• Large numbers of depressed elderly people live in residential care but few receive appropriate management
• A population based, multifaceted shared care intervention for late life depression was more effective than routine care in improving depression outcome
• The outcome of late life depression can be improved by enhancing the clinical skills of general practitioners and care staff and by providing depression related health education and activity programmes for residents
• The intervention needs further refining and evaluation to improve its effectiveness and to determine how best to implement it in other residential care settings