Mir-660 is downregulated in lung cancer patients and its replacement inhibits lung tumorigenesis by targeting MDM2-p53 interaction

Lung cancer represents the leading cause of cancer-related death in developed countries. Despite the advances in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, the 5-year survival rate remains low. The research for novel therapies directed to biological targets has modified the therapeutic approach, but the frequent engagement of resistance mechanisms and the substantial costs, limit the ability to reduce lung cancer mortality. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs with known regulatory functions in cancer initiation and progression. In this study we found that mir-660 expression is downregulated in lung tumors compared with adjacent normal tissues and in plasma samples of lung cancer patients with poor prognosis, suggesting a potential functional role of this miRNA in lung tumorigenesis. Transient and stable overexpression of mir-660 using miRNA mimics reduced migration, invasion, and proliferation properties and increased apoptosis in p53 wild-type lung cancer cells (NCI-H460, LT73, and A549). Furthermore, stable overexpression using lentiviral vectors in NCI-H460 and A549 cells inhibited tumor xenograft growth in immunodeficient mice (95 and 50% reduction compared with control, respectively), whereas the effects of mir-660 overexpression were absent in H1299, a lung cancer cell line lacking p53 locus, both in in vitro and in vivo assays. We identified and validated mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) gene, a key regulator of the expression and function of p53, as a new direct target of mir-660. In addition, mir-660 expression reduced both mRNA and protein expression of MDM2 in all cell lines and stabilized p53 protein levels resulting in an upregulation of p21^WAF1/CIP1 in p53 wild-type cells. Our finding supports that mir-660 acts as a tumor suppressor miRNA and we suggest the replacement of mir-660 as a new therapeutic approach for p53 wild-type lung cancer treatment.Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, resulting in >1.4 million deaths/year.¹ Lung tumors are often discovered as locally advanced or metastatic disease, and despite improvements in molecular diagnosis and targeted therapies, the overall 5-year survival rate remains in the 10–20% range. Indeed, nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poorly chemosensitive to most of the available agents with response rates ranging from 10 to 25%.² The discovery of recurrent mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase,³ as well as gene fusion products involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK),⁴ has led to a marked change in the treatment of patients with lung adenocarcinoma, the most common type of lung cancer.^{5, 6} To date, patients with mutations in the EGFR gene, suitable for targeting by EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, represent roughly 10%, whereas the subgroup of tumors with ALK rearrangements, targeted by ALK inhibitors, is only ~5%.⁷ Thus, the majority of lung tumors lack effective treatment and novel therapeutic strategies are still needed.MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short noncoding RNAs, 20–24 nucleotides long, that have important roles in almost all biological pathways,^{8, 9, 10, 11} and influence cancer-relevant processes, such as proliferation,¹² cell cycle,¹³ apoptosis,¹⁴ and migration.¹⁵ Many studies have reported the critical role of miRNAs in lung cancer pathogenesis and their potential as biomarkers for lung cancer risk stratification,¹⁶ outcome prediction,¹⁷ and classification of histological subtypes.^{18, 19} miRNAs are actively released by various cell types and can be detected in biological fluids, such as plasma and serum, making them suitable as circulating biomarkers in NSCLC.^{20, 21}There is limited evidence of mir-660 deregulation in cancer and little is known about its role in lung tumorigenesis and its putative target genes. Mir-660 has been reported to be upregulated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia^{22, 23} and in leukemic cells after treatment with 4-hydroxynonenal, a compound that induces differentiation and blocks proliferation of leukemic cells.²⁴ In a previous study we demonstrated that mir-660 was one of the 24 miRNAs deregulated in plasma samples of NSCLC patients identified in a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening trial.²⁰The p53 tumor suppressor protein is a key regulator of cell cycle G0/G1 checkpoint, senescence, and apoptosis in response to cellular stress signals.^{25, 26} Mouse double minute 2 (MDM2), a p53–E3 ubiquitin ligase,²⁷ is the principal negative regulator of the expression level and function of p53.^{28, 29} Several studies have illustrated different mechanisms of p53 regulation by MDM2,^{30, 31} such as binding transactivation region of p53,^{32, 33} promoting nuclear export and cytoplasmic accumulation of p53 by monoubiquitination,^{34, 35} and inducing p53 proteosomal degradation by polyubiquitination.³⁶ In addition, MDM2 gene has been reported to be amplified or overexpressed in a variety of human cancers, such as sarcoma,³⁷ lymphoma,³⁸ breast cancer,³⁹ lung cancer,⁴⁰ and testicular germ cell tumor.⁴¹ Several miRNAs targeting MDM2 have been identified, such as the mir-143/mir-145 cluster that can be induced by p53,⁴² as well as mir-25 and mir-32, known to inhibit tumor glioblastoma growth in mouse brain.⁴³In this study, we report that mir-660 is downregulated in tissue and plasma samples of lung cancer patients and demonstrate that mir-660 replacement impairs the functionality of p53 wild-type (wt) lung cancer cells and inhibits in vitro and in vivo tumor growth. We showed that all the effects observed after mir-660 overexpression were absent in p53 ko cells, identified MDM2 as mir-660 direct target gene and indicate impairment of the MDM2/p53 interaction as the mechanism underlying tumor growth inhibition.     

TRAF2 is a biologically important necroptosis suppressor

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) triggers necroptotic cell death through an intracellular signaling complex containing receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and RIPK3, called the necrosome. RIPK1 phosphorylates RIPK3, which phosphorylates the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase-domain-like (MLKL)—driving its oligomerization and membrane-disrupting necroptotic activity. Here, we show that TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2)—previously implicated in apoptosis suppression—also inhibits necroptotic signaling by TNFα. TRAF2 disruption in mouse fibroblasts augmented TNFα–driven necrosome formation and RIPK3-MLKL association, promoting necroptosis. TRAF2 constitutively associated with MLKL, whereas TNFα reversed this via cylindromatosis-dependent TRAF2 deubiquitination. Ectopic interaction of TRAF2 and MLKL required the C-terminal portion but not the N-terminal, RING, or CIM region of TRAF2. Induced TRAF2 knockout (KO) in adult mice caused rapid lethality, in conjunction with increased hepatic necrosome assembly. By contrast, TRAF2 KO on a RIPK3 KO background caused delayed mortality, in concert with elevated intestinal caspase-8 protein and activity. Combined injection of TNFR1-Fc, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc decoys prevented death upon TRAF2 KO. However, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc were ineffective, whereas TNFR1-Fc and interferon α receptor (IFNAR1)-Fc were partially protective against lethality upon combined TRAF2 and RIPK3 KO. These results identify TRAF2 as an important biological suppressor of necroptosis in vitro and in vivo.Apoptotic cell death is mediated by caspases and has distinct morphological features, including membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage and nuclear fragmentation.^{1, 2, 3, 4} In contrast, necroptotic cell death is caspase-independent and is characterized by loss of membrane integrity, cell swelling and implosion.^{1, 2, 5} Nevertheless, necroptosis is a highly regulated process, requiring activation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, which form the core necrosome complex.^{1, 2, 5} Necrosome assembly can be induced via specific death receptors or toll-like receptors, among other modules.^{6, 7, 8, 9} The activated necrosome engages MLKL by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation.^{6, 10, 11} MLKL then oligomerizes and binds to membrane phospholipids, forming pores that cause necroptotic cell death.^{10, 12, 13, 14, 15} Unchecked necroptosis disrupts embryonic development in mice and contributes to several human diseases.^{7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}The apoptotic mediators FADD, caspase-8 and cFLIP suppress necroptosis.^{19, 20, 21, 23, 24} Elimination of any of these genes in mice causes embryonic lethality, subverted by additional deletion of RIPK3 or MLKL.^{19, 20, 21, 25} Necroptosis is also regulated at the level of RIPK1. Whereas TNFα engagement of TNFR1 leads to K63-linked ubiquitination of RIPK1 by cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) to promote nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation,²⁶ necroptosis requires suppression or reversal of this modification to allow RIPK1 autophosphorylation and consequent RIPK3 activation.^{2, 23, 27, 28} CYLD promotes necroptotic signaling by deubiquitinating RIPK1, augmenting its interaction with RIPK3.²⁹ Conversely, caspase-8-mediated CYLD cleavage inhibits necroptosis.²⁴TRAF2 recruits cIAPs to the TNFα-TNFR1 signaling complex, facilitating NF-κB activation.^{30, 31, 32, 33} TRAF2 also supports K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of death-receptor-activated caspase-8, curbing apoptosis.³⁴ TRAF2 KO mice display embryonic lethality; some survive through birth but have severe developmental and immune deficiencies and die prematurely.^{35, 36} Conditional TRAF2 KO leads to rapid intestinal inflammation and mortality.³⁷ Furthermore, hepatic TRAF2 depletion augments apoptosis activation via Fas/CD95.³⁴ TRAF2 attenuates necroptosis induction in vitro by the death ligands Apo2L/TRAIL and Fas/CD95L.³⁸ However, it remains unclear whether TRAF2 regulates TNFα-induced necroptosis—and if so—how. Our present findings reveal that TRAF2 inhibits TNFα necroptotic signaling. Furthermore, our results establish TRAF2 as a biologically important necroptosis suppressor in vitro and in vivo and provide initial insight into the mechanisms underlying this function.     

Suppression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition and apoptotic pathways by miR-294/302 family synergistically blocks let-7-induced silencing of self-renewal in embryonic stem cells

The embryonic stem cell (ESC)-enriched miR-294/302 family and the somatic cell-enriched let-7 family stabilizes the self-renewing and differentiated cell fates, respectively. The mechanisms underlying these processes remain unknown. Here we show that among many pathways regulated by miR-294/302, the combinatorial suppression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and apoptotic pathways is sufficient in maintaining the self-renewal of ESCs. The silencing of ESC self-renewal by let-7 was accompanied by the upregulation of several EMT regulators and the induction of apoptosis. The ectopic activation of either EMT or apoptotic program is sufficient in silencing ESC self-renewal. However, only combined but not separate suppression of the two programs inhibited the silencing of ESC self-renewal by let-7 and several other differentiation-inducing miRNAs. These findings demonstrate that combined repression of the EMT and apoptotic pathways by miR-294/302 imposes a synergistic barrier to the silencing of ESC self-renewal, supporting a model whereby miRNAs regulate complicated cellular processes through synergistic repression of multiple targets or pathways.Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) can self-renew indefinitely and differentiate into any cell type.¹ Therefore, they hold great potential for clinical applications in regenerative medicine. However, the molecular mechanisms regulating the self-renewal and differentiation of ESCs are still not fully understood. miRNAs are an important class of short non-coding RNAs that regulate ESC self-renewal and differentiation.² miRNA-deficient ESCs proliferate at a slower rate with a slight accumulation of cells in the G1 phase, and they cannot silence the self-renewal program when induced to differentiate.^{3, 4, 5} Introducing individual members from an miRNA family highly expressed in ESCs partially rescues the proliferation defect and reverses the G1 accumulation.⁶ The family shares a seed sequence (5′-AAGUGCU-3′) and has eight members, including miR-294 and miR-302a-d. Because of their role in influencing the ESC Cell Cycle, they have been called the ESCC family of miRNAs. In addition, ESC cell cycle regulating miRNAs (ESCC miRNAs) suppress the G1 restriction point by inhibiting retinoblastoma (Rb) family proteins, preventing ESCs from exiting the cell cycle during serum starvation or contact inhibition.⁷ In contrast to ESCC miRNAs, the introduction of let-7 family miRNAs that are enriched in somatic cells as well as several other lineage-specific miRNAs such as miR-26a, miR-99b, miR-193, miR-199a-5p, and miR-218 silences self-renewal in Dgcr8−/− (DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8−/−) ESCs but not wild-type ESCs.^{7, 8} Interestingly, the ESCC miRNAs prevent these miRNAs from silencing ESC self-renewal. Consistent with their roles in promoting self-renewal, ESCC miRNAs dramatically enhance the de-differentiation of human and mouse fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).^{9, 10, 11, 12, 13}How ESCC miRNAs maintain self-renewal in the presence of differentiation-inducing miRNAs is not clearly understood. Genomic studies have shown that these miRNAs target hundreds of mRNAs enriched in many biological processes.^{8, 14, 15, 16} Functional analysis of a small number of targets chosen based on their known roles has begun to give some insights into their functions in reprogramming somatic cells to iPSCs.^{10, 11, 17} However, due to the inherent differences between the maintenance and establishment of pluripotency,¹⁸ what targets or pathways underlie the antagonism between the two opposing families of miRNAs in regulating ESC self-renewal remains unknown. Recent work showed that while the miR-294/302 family suppresses and let-7 induces the G1/S restriction point, this cell cycle function cannot explain their antagonistic roles in maintaining pluripotency.⁷ Therefore, we set out to search for additional functions of the two miRNA families that directly underlie their opposing roles in regulating pluripotency. In this study, we found that combined repression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and apoptotic pathways by miR-294/302 forms a synergistic barrier to block the silencing of ESC self-renewal by let-7 and other differentiation-inducing miRNAs.     

New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Transplantation in a Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fasicularis)

A 5.5-y-old intact male cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fasicularis) presented with inappetence and weight loss 57 d after heterotopic heart and thymus transplantation while receiving an immunosuppressant regimen consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone to prevent graft rejection. A serum chemistry panel, a glycated hemoglobin test, and urinalysis performed at presentation revealed elevated blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (727 mg/dL and 10.1%, respectively), glucosuria, and ketonuria. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed, and insulin therapy was initiated immediately. The macaque was weaned off the immunosuppressive therapy as his clinical condition improved and stabilized. Approximately 74 d after discontinuation of the immunosuppressants, the blood glucose normalized, and the insulin therapy was stopped. The animal''s blood glucose and HbA1c values have remained within normal limits since this time. We suspect that our macaque experienced new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, a condition that is commonly observed in human transplant patients but not well described in NHP. To our knowledge, this report represents the first documented case of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation in a cynomolgus macaque.Abbreviations: NODAT, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantationNew-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT, formerly known as posttransplantation diabetes mellitus) is an important consequence of solid-organ transplantation in humans.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} A variety of risk factors have been identified including increased age, sex (male prevalence), elevated pretransplant fasting plasma glucose levels, and immunosuppressive therapy.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} The relationship between calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporin, and the development of NODAT is widely recognized in human medicine.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} Cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fasicularis) are a commonly used NHP model in organ transplantation research. Cases of natural and induced diabetes of cynomolgus monkeys have been described in the literature;^14,43,45 however, NODAT in a macaque model of solid-organ transplantation has not been reported previously to our knowledge.