Differential regulation of β2-adrenoceptor and adenosine A2B receptor signalling by GRK and arrestin proteins in arterial smooth muscle

Generation of cAMP through G_s-coupled G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) [e.g. β₂-adrenoceptor (β₂AR), adenosine A_2B receptor (A_2BR)] activation, induces arterial smooth muscle relaxation, counteracting the actions of vasoconstrictors. G_s-coupled GPCR signalling is regulated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK) and arrestin proteins, and dysregulation of Gs/GPCR signalling is thought play a role in the development of hypertension, which may be a consequence of enhanced GRK2 and/or arrestin expression. However, despite numerous studies indicating that β₂AR and A_2BR can be substrates for GRK/arrestin proteins, currently little is known regarding GRK/arrestin regulation of these endogenous receptors in arterial smooth muscle. Here, endogenous GRK isoenzymes and arrestin proteins were selectively depleted using RNA-interference in rat arterial smooth muscle cells (RASM) and the consequences of this for β₂AR- and A_2BR-mediated adenylyl cyclase (AC) signalling were determined by assessing cAMP accumulation. GRK2 or GRK5 depletion enhanced and prolonged β₂AR/AC signalling, while combined deletion of GRK2/5 has an additive effect. Conversely, activation of AC by A_2BR was regulated by GRK5, but not GRK2. β₂AR desensitization was attenuated following combined GRK2/GRK5 knockdown, but not by depletion of individual GRKs, arrestins, or by inhibiting PKA. Arrestin3 (but not arrestin2) depletion enhanced A_2BR-AC signalling and attenuated A_2BR desensitization, while β₂AR-AC signalling was regulated by both arrestin isoforms. This study provides a first demonstration of how different complements of GRK and arrestin proteins contribute to the regulation of signalling and desensitization of these important receptors mediating vasodilator responses in arterial smooth muscle.     

Osteoblast differentiation and survival: A role for A2B adenosine receptor allosteric modulators

The A_2B adenosine receptor (A_2B AR), activated in response to high levels of endogenous adenosine, is the major AR subtype involved in mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) differentiation to osteoblasts and bone formation. For this reason, targeting of A_2B AR with selective allosteric modulators may represent a promising pharmacological approach to the treatment of bone diseases.Herein, we report the characterization of a 3-keto-indole derivative, 2-(1-benzyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxo-N-phenylacetamide (KI-7), as A_2B AR positive allosteric modulator in MSCs, demonstrating that this compound is able to potentiate the effects of either adenosine and synthetic orthosteric A_2B AR agonists in mediating osteoblast differentiation in vitro. In detail, we observed that MSC treatment with KI-7 determined an increase in the expression of osteoblast-related genes (Runx2 and osterix) and osteoblast marker proteins (phosphatase alkaline and osteocalcin), associated with a stimulation of osteoblast mineralization.In the early phase of differentiation programme, KI-7 significantly potentiated physiological and A_2B AR agonist-mediated down-regulation of IL-6 release. Conversely, during the late stage of differentiation, when most of the cells have an osteoblast phenotype, KI-7 caused a sustained raise in IL-6 levels and an improvement in osteoblast viability. These data suggest that a positive allosteric modulation of A_2B AR not only favours MSC commitment to osteoblasts, but also ensures a greater survival of mature osteoblasts. Our study paves the way for a therapeutic use of selective positive allosteric modulators of A_2B AR in the control of osteoblast differentiation, bone formation and fracture repair.     

The in vivo role of the RP-Mdm2-p53 pathway in signaling oncogenic stress induced by pRb inactivation and Ras overexpression

The Mdm2-p53 tumor suppression pathway plays a vital role in regulating cellular homeostasis by integrating a variety of stressors and eliciting effects on cell growth and proliferation. Recent studies have demonstrated an in vivo signaling pathway mediated by ribosomal protein (RP)-Mdm2 interaction that responds to ribosome biogenesis stress and evokes a protective p53 reaction. It has been shown that mice harboring a Cys-to-Phe mutation in the zinc finger of Mdm2 that specifically disrupts RP L11-Mdm2 binding are prone to accelerated lymphomagenesis in an oncogenic c-Myc driven mouse model of Burkitt's lymphoma. Because most oncogenes when upregulated simultaneously promote both cellular growth and proliferation, it therefore stands to reason that the RP-Mdm2-p53 pathway might also be essential in response to oncogenes other than c-Myc. Using genetically engineered mice, we now show that disruption of the RP-Mdm2-p53 pathway by an Mdm2(C305F) mutation does not accelerate prostatic tumorigenesis induced by inactivation of the pRb family proteins (pRb/p107/p130). In contrast, loss of p19Arf greatly accelerates the progression of prostate cancer induced by inhibition of pRb family proteins. Moreover, using ectopically expressed oncogenic H-Ras we demonstrate that p53 response remains intact in the Mdm2(C305F) mutant MEF cells. Thus, unlike the p19Arf-Mdm2-p53 pathway, which is considered a general oncogenic response pathway, the RP-Mdm2-p53 pathway appears to specifically suppress tumorigenesis induced by oncogenic c-Myc.     

p53 and MDM2 are involved in the regulation of osteocalcin gene expression

Osteocalcin (OC) is a major noncollagenous bone matrix protein and an osteoblast marker whose expression is limited to mature osteoblasts during the late differentiation stage. In previous studies we have shown osteosarcomas to lose p53 function with a corresponding loss of osteocalcin gene expression. Introduction of wild type p53 resulted in re expression of the osteocalcin gene. Using gel shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we have identified a putative p53 binding site within the rat OC promoter region and observed an increase in OC promoter activity when p53 accumulates using a CAT assay. The p53 inducible gene Mdm2 is a well-known downstream regulator of p53 levels. Our results showed a synergistic increase in the OC promoter activity when both p53 and MDM2 were transiently overexpressed. We further demonstrate that p53 is not degraded during overexpression of MDM2 protein. Increased OC expression was observed with concomitantly increased p53, VDR, and MDM2 levels in ROS17/2.8 cells during treatment with differentiation promoting (DP) media, but was significantly decreased when co-treated with DP media and the small molecule inhibitor of MDM2-p53 interaction, Nutlin-3. We have also observed a dramatic increase of the OC promoter activity in the presence of p53 and Mdm2 with inclusion of Cbfa-1 and p300 factors. Our results suggest that under some physiological conditions the oncoprotein MDM2 may cooperate with p53 to regulate the osteocalcin gene during osteoblastic differentiation.     

Akt‐ and Erk‐mediated regulation of proliferation and differentiation during PDGFRβ‐induced MSC self‐renewal

Understanding the mechanisms that direct mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) self‐renewal fate decisions is a key to most tissue regenerative approaches. The aim of this study here was to investigate the mechanisms of action of platelet‐derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) signalling on MSC proliferation and differentiation. MSC were cultured and stimulated with PDGF‐BB together with inhibitors of second messenger pathways. Cell proliferation was assessed using ethynyl‐2′‐deoxyuridine and phosphorylation status of signalling molecules assessed by Western Blots. To assess differentiation potentials, cells were transferred to adipogenic or osteogenic media, and differentiation assessed by expression of differentiation association genes by qRT‐PCR, and by long‐term culture assays. Our results showed that distinct pathways with opposing actions were activated by PDGF. PI3K/Akt signalling was the main contributor to MSC proliferation in response to activation of PDGFRβ. We also demonstrate a negative feedback mechanism between PI3K/Akt and PDGFR‐β expression. In addition, PI3K/Akt downstream signal cascades, mTOR and its associated proteins p70S6K and 4E‐BP1 were involved. These pathways induced the expression of cyclin D1, cyclin D3 and CDK6 to promote cell cycle progression and MSC proliferation. In contrast, activation of Erk by PDGFRβ signalling potently inhibited the adipocytic differentiation of MSCs by blocking PPARγ and CEBPα expression. The data suggest that PDGFRβ‐induced Akt and Erk pathways regulate opposing fate decisions of proliferation and differentiation to promote MSC self‐renewal. Thus, activation of multiple intracellular cascades is required for successful and sustainable MSC self‐renewal strategies.     

Multi-lineage differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells – To Wnt,or not Wnt

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent precursor cells originating from several adult connective tissues. MSCs possess the ability to self-renew and differentiate into several lineages, and are recognized by the expression of unique cell surface markers. Several lines of evidence suggest that various signal transduction pathways and their interplay regulate MSC differentiation. To that end, a critical player in regulating MSC differentiation is a group of proteins encoded by the Wnt gene family, which was previously known for influencing various stages of embryonic development and cell fate determination. As MSCs have gained significant clinical attention for their potential applications in regenerative medicine, it is imperative to unravel the mechanisms by which molecular regulators control differentiation of MSCs for designing cell-based therapeutics. It is rather coincidental that the functional outcome(s) of Wnt-induced signals share similarities with cellular redox-mediated networks from the standpoint of MSC biology. Furthermore, there is evidence for a crosstalk between Wnt and redox signalling, which begs the question whether Wnt-mediated differentiation signals involve the intermediary role of reactive oxygen species. In this review, we summarize the impact of Wnt signalling on multi-lineage differentiation of MSCs, and attempt to unravel the intricate interplay between Wnt and redox signals.     

The Mdm2 Oncoprotein Interacts with the Cell Fate Regulator Numb

The Mdm2 oncoprotein is a well-known inhibitor of the p53 tumor suppressor, but it may also possess p53-independent activities. In search of such p53-independent activities, the yeast two-hybrid screen was employed to identify Mdm2-binding proteins. We report that in vitro and in transfected cells, Mdm2 can associate with Numb, a protein involved in the determination of cell fate. This association causes translocation of overexpressed Numb into the nucleus and leads to a reduction in overall cellular Numb levels. Through its interaction with Numb, Mdm2 may influence processes such as differentiation and survival. This could potentially contribute to the altered properties of tumor cells which overexpress Mdm2.     

Ribosomal Proteins RPL37, RPS15 and RPS20 Regulate the Mdm2-p53-MdmX Network

Changes to the nucleolus, the site of ribosome production, have long been linked to cancer, and mutations in several ribosomal proteins (RPs) have been associated with an increased risk for cancer in human diseases. Relevantly, a number of RPs have been shown to bind to MDM2 and inhibit MDM2 E3 ligase activity, leading to p53 stabilization and cell cycle arrest, thus revealing a RP-Mdm2-p53 signaling pathway that is critical for ribosome biogenesis surveillance. Here, we have identified RPL37, RPS15, and RPS20 as RPs that can also bind Mdm2 and activate p53. We found that each of the aforementioned RPs, when ectopically expressed, can stabilize both co-expressed Flag-tagged Mdm2 and HA-tagged p53 in p53-null cells as well as endogenous p53 in a p53-containing cell line. For each RP, the mechanism of Mdm2 and p53 stabilization appears to be through inhibiting the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of Mdm2. Interestingly, although they are each capable of inducing cell death and cell cycle arrest, these RPs differ in the p53 target genes that are regulated upon their respective introduction into cells. Furthermore, each RP can downregulate MdmX levels but in distinct ways. Thus, RPL37, RPS15 and RPS20 regulate the Mdm2-p53-MdmX network but employ different mechanisms to do so.     

Concomitant Inhibition of MDM2 and Bcl-2 Protein Function Synergistically Induce Mitochondrial Apoptosis in AML

Disruption of Mdm2-p53 interaction activates p53 signaling, disrupts the balance ofantiapoptotic and proapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins and induces apoptosis in acutemyeloid leukemia (AML). Overexpression of Bcl-2 may inhibit this effect. Thus,functional inactivation of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins may enhance apoptogenic effects ofMdm2 inhibition. We here investigate the potential therapeutic utility of combinedtargeting of Mdm2 by Nutlin-3a and Bcl-2 by ABT-737, recently developed inhibitors ofprotein-protein interactions. Nutlin-3a and ABT-737 induced Bax conformational changeand mitochondrial apoptosis in AML cells in a strikingly synergistic fashion. Nutlin-3ainduced p53-mediated apoptosis predominantly in S and G₂/M cells, while cells in G₁ were protected through induction of p21. In contrast, ABT-737 induced apoptosis predominantly in G₁ , the cell cycle phase with the lowest Bcl-2 protein levels and Bcl-2/Bax ratios. In addition, Bcl-2 phosphorylation on Ser⁷⁰ was absent in G₁ but detectable in G₂/M, thus lower Bcl-2 levels and absence of Bcl-2 phosphorylation appeared to facilitate ABT-737-induced apoptosis of G₁ cells. The complementary effects of Nutlin-3a and ABT-737 in different cell cycle phases could, in part, account for their synergistic activity. Our data suggest that combined targeting of Mdm2 and Bcl-2 proteins could offer considerable therapeutic promise in AML.     

Change in hepatocyte growth factor concentration promote mesenchymal stem cell-mediated osteogenic regeneration

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) play a crucial role in tissue repair by secretion of tissue nutrient factors such as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). However, studies examining the effects of HGF on the proliferation and differentiation of MSCs used different concentrations of HGF and reported conflicting conclusions. This study aimed to determine the mechanisms by which different concentrations of HGF regulate MSC proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, and validate the mechanism in an animal model of early stage avascular necrosis of femoral head (ANFH). Our results demonstrate that a low concentration of HGF (20 ng/ml) preferentially promotes MSC osteogenic differentiation through increased c-Met expression and phosphorylation, Akt pathway activation, and increased expression of p27, Runx2 and Osterix. In contrast, a high concentration of HGF (100 ng/ml) strongly induced proliferation by inducing strong activation of the ERK1/2 signalling pathway. As validated by animal experiments, high localized expression of HGF achieved by transplantation of HGF transgenic MSCs into ANFH rabbits increased the number of MSCs. Subsequently, 2 weeks after transplantation, HGF levels decreased and MSCs differentiated into osteoblasts and resulted in efficient tissue repair. Our results demonstrate that sequential concentration changes in HGF control the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs in vivo. This phenomenon can be exploited therapeutically to induce bone regeneration and, in turn, improve the efficacy of pharmacological intervention for ANFH treatment.     

Virtual screening of low molecular weight mushrooms compounds as potential Mdm2 inhibitors

In some human cancer cases, the activity of p53 is inhibited by over-expressed Mdm2. The Mdm2 acts as an ubiquitin ligase, resulting in p53 ubiquitination and subsequent p53 proteasomal degradation. The disruption of the Mdm2-p53 interaction using small-molecule inhibitors is recognized as a promising strategy for anti-cancer drug design. Mushrooms are an important source of powerful compounds with anti-tumour properties. In this study, the first virtual screening of low molecular weight compounds present in mushroom is presented as potential Mdm2 inhibitors. A re-docking and cross-docking method was used to validate the virtual screening protocol. The steroids: ganoderic acids X (K_i?=?16nM), Y (K_i?=?22nM) and F (K_i?=?69nM); 5,6-epoxy-24(R)-methylcholesta-7,22-dien-3β-ol (K_i?=?74nM) and polyporenic acid C (K_i?=?59nM) stand out as the top ranked potential inhibitors of Mdm2. The docking pose of the most promising compounds were carefully analysed and the information provided shows several interesting starting points for further development of Mdm2 inhibitors.     

S6K1 is a multifaceted regulator of Mdm2 that connects nutrient status and DNA damage response

p53 mediates DNA damage‐induced cell‐cycle arrest, apoptosis, or senescence, and it is controlled by Mdm2, which mainly ubiquitinates p53 in the nucleus and promotes p53 nuclear export and degradation. By searching for the kinases responsible for Mdm2 S163 phosphorylation under genotoxic stress, we identified S6K1 as a multifaceted regulator of Mdm2. DNA damage activates mTOR‐S6K1 through p38α MAPK. The activated S6K1 forms a tighter complex with Mdm2, inhibits Mdm2‐mediated p53 ubiquitination, and promotes p53 induction, in addition to phosphorylating Mdm2 on S163. Deactivation of mTOR‐S6K1 signalling leads to Mdm2 nuclear translocation, which is facilitated by S163 phosphorylation, a reduction in p53 induction, and an alteration in p53‐dependent cell death. These findings thus establish mTOR‐S6K1 as a novel regulator of p53 in DNA damage response and likely in tumorigenesis. S6K1–Mdm2 interaction presents a route for cells to incorporate the metabolic/energy cues into DNA damage response and links the aging‐controlling Mdm2–p53 and mTOR‐S6K pathways.     

Molecular Basis for the Inhibition of p53 by Mdmx

The oncoprotein Mdm2, and the recently intensely studied, homologues protein Mdmx, are principal negative regulators of the p53 tumor uppressor. The mechanisms by which they regulate the stability and activity of p53 are not fully established. We have determined the crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of Mdmx bound to a 15-residue p53 peptide. The structure reveals that although the principle features of the Mdm2-p53 interaction are preserved in the Mdmx-p53 complex, the Mdmx hydrophobic cleft on which the p53 peptide binds is significantly altered: a part of the cleft is blocked by sidechains of Met and Tyr of the p53-binding pocket of Mdmx. Thus specific inhibitors of Mdm2-p53 would not be optimal for binding to Mdmx. Our binding assays show indeed that nutlins, the newly discovered, potent antagonists of the Mdm2-p53 interaction, are notcapable to efficiently disrupt the Mdmx-p53 interaction. To achieve full activation of p53 in tumor cells, compounds that are specific for Mdmx are necessary to complement the Mdm2 specific binders.     

GRK2-Dependent Desensitization Downstream of G Proteins

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are serine/threonine kinases first discovered by its role in receptor desensitization. Phosphorylation of the C-terminal tail of GPCRs by GRKs triggers the docking of β-arrestins and the functional uncoupling of G proteins and receptors. In addition, we and others have uncovered new direct ways by which GRKs could impinge into intracellular signalling pathways independently of receptor phosphorylation. In particular, we have characterized that elevated GRK2 levels can reduce CCR2-mediated activation of the ERK MAPK route in a manner that is independent of kinase activity and also of G proteins. This inhibition of ERK occurred in the absence of any reduction on MEK phosphorylation, what implicates that GRK2 is acting at the level of MEK or at the MEK-ERK interface to achieve a downregulation of ERK phosphorylation. In fact, we describe here that a direct association between GRK2 and MEK proteins can be detected in vitro. p38 MAPK pathway also appears to be regulated directly by GRK2 in a receptor-independent manner. p38 can be phosphorylated by GRK2 in threonine 123, a residue sitting at the entrance of a docking groove by which this MAPK associates to substrates and upstream activators. The T123phospho-mimetic mutant of p38 shows a reduced ability to bind to MKK6, concomitant with an impaired p38 activation, and a decreased phosphorylation of downstream substrates such as MEF2, MK2 and ATF2. Elevated levels of GRK2 downregulate p38-dependent cellular responses, such as differentiation of preadipocytic cells, while LPS-induced cytokine release is enhanced in macrophages from GRK2 (+/?) mice. In sum, we describe in this article different ways by which GRK2 directly regulates MAPK-mediated cellular events. This regulation of the MAPK modules by GRK2 could be relevant in pathological situations where the levels of this kinase are altered, such as during inflammatory diseases or cardiovascular pathologies.     

Interaction of p53 with Mdm2 and azurin as studied by atomic force spectroscopy

Azurin, a bacterial protein, can be internalized in cancer cells and induce apoptosis. Such anticancer effect is coupled to the formation of a complex with the tumour‐suppressor p53. The mechanism by which azurin stabilizes p53 and the binding sites of their complex are still under investigation. It is also known that the predominant mechanism for p53 down‐regulation implies its association to Mdm2, the main ubiquitin ligase affecting its stability. However, the p53/Mdm2 interaction, occurring at the level of both their N‐terminal domains, has been characterized so far by experiments involving only partial domains of these proteins. The relevance of the p53/Mdm2 complex as a possible target of the anticancer therapies requires a deeper study of this complex as made up of the two entire proteins. Moreover, the apparent antagonist action of azurin against Mdm2, with respect of p53 regulation, might suggest the possibility that azurin binds p53 at the same site of Mdm2, preventing in such a way p53 and Mdm2 from association and thus p53 from degradation. By following the interaction of the two entire proteins by atomic force spectroscopy, we have assessed the formation of a specific complex between p53 and Mdm2. We found for it a binding strength and a dissociation rate constant typical of dynamical protein–protein interactions and we observed that azurin, even if capable to bind p53, does not compete with Mdm2 for the same binding site on p53. The formation of the p53/Mdm2/azurin ternary complex might suggest an alternative anti‐cancer mechanism adopted by azurin. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.