Finding Optimal Ingroup Topologies and Convexities When the Choice of Outgroups Is Not Obvious

Considerable confusion remains among theoreticians and practicioners of phylogenetic science on the use of outgroup taxa. Here, we show that, despite claims to the contrary, details of the optimal ingroup topology can be changed by switching outgroup taxa. This has serious implications for phylogenetic accuracy. We delineate between the process of outgroup selection and the various possible processes involved in using an outgroup taxon after one has been selected. Criteria are needed for the determination that particular outgroup taxa do not reduce the accuracy of evolutionary tree topologies and inferred character state transformations. We compare previous results from a sensitivity bootstrap analysis of the mitochondrial cytochromebphylogenetic relationships among whales to the results of a Bremer support sensitivity analysis and of a recently developed application of RASA theory to the question of putative outgroup taxon plesiomorphy content.     

Optimal outgroup analysis

We present and critically examine a statistical criterion for the selection of outgroup taxa for rooting evolutionary trees. The criterion is the amount of phylogenetic signal for the ingroup when the states of the candidate outgroup taxa are assumed to be plesiomorphic relative to the ingroup for the purpose of measuring plesiomorphy content of the outgroup taxon. A statistical measure of rooted, ingroup signal was subjected to a suite of critical tests which indicate that it provides a proxy measure of plesiomorphy content. As the evolutionary distance between the ingroup ancestral node and outgroup taxa increases, the tree-independent measure of signal decreases, tracking the decay in plesiomorphy content and the increase in convergence to the ingroup states. We show that a priori generalizations about optimal outgroup taxon sampling strategies are likely to be misleading, and that testing for the suitability of available outgroup taxon sampling in specific instances is warranted. Software for optimal outgroup analysis is available.     

Rooting phylogenetic trees with distant outgroups: a case study from the commelinoid monocots

Phylogenetic rooting experiments demonstrate that two chloroplast genes from commelinoid monocot taxa that represent the closest living relatives of the pickerelweed family, Pontederiaceae, retain measurable signals regarding the position of that family's root. The rooting preferences of the chloroplast sequences were compared with those for artificial sequences that correspond to outgroups so divergent that their signal has been lost completely. These random sequences prefer the three longest branches in the unrooted ingroup topology and do not preferentially root on the branches favored by real outgroup sequences. However, the rooting behavior of the artificial sequences is not a simple function of branch length. The random outgroups preferentially root on long terminal ingroup branches, but many ingroup branches comparable in length to those favored by random sequences attract no or few hits. Nonterminal ingroup branches are generally avoided, regardless of their length. Comparisons of the ease of forcing sequences onto suboptimal roots indicate that real outgroups require a substantially greater rooting penalty than random outgroups for around half of the least-parsimonious candidate roots. Although this supports the existence of nonrandomized signal in the real outgroups, it also indicates that there is little power to choose among the optimal and nearly optimal rooting possibilities. A likelihood-based test rejects the hypothesis that all rootings of the subtree using real outgroup sequences are equally good explanations of the data and also eliminates around half of the least optimal candidate roots. Adding genes or outgroups can improve the ability to discriminate among different root locations. Rooting discriminatory power is shown to be stronger, in general, for more closely related outgroups and is highly correlated among different real outgroups, genes, and optimality criteria.     

A review of long-branch attraction

The history of long‐branch attraction, and in particular methods suggested to detect and avoid the artifact to date, is reviewed. Methods suggested to avoid LBA‐artifacts include excluding long‐branch taxa, excluding faster evolving third codon positions, using inference methods less sensitive to LBA such as likelihood, the Aguinaldo et al. approach, sampling more taxa to break up long branches and sampling more characters especially of another kind, and the pros and cons of these are discussed. Methods suggested to detect LBA are numerous and include methodological disconcordance, RASA, separate partition analyses, parametric simulation, random outgroup sequences, long‐branch extraction, split decomposition and spectral analysis. Less than 10 years ago it was doubted if LBA occurred in real datasets. Today, examples are numerous in the literature and it is argued that the development of methods to deal with the problem is warranted. A 16 kbp dataset of placental mammals and a morphological and molecular combined dataset of gall waSPS are used to illustrate the particularly common problem of LBA of problematic ingroup taxa to outgroups. The preferred methods of separate partition analysis, methodological disconcordance, and long branch extraction are used to demonstrate detection methods. It is argued that since outgroup taxa almost always represent long branches and are as such a hazard towards misplacing long branched ingroup taxa, phylogenetic analyses should always be run with and without the outgroups included. This will detect whether only the outgroup roots the ingroup or if it simultaneously alters the ingroup topology, in which case previous studies have shown that the latter is most often the worse. Apart from that LBA to outgroups is the major and most common problem; scanning the literature also detected the ill advised comfort of high support values from thousands of characters, but very few taxa, in the age of genomics. Taxon sampling is crucial for an accurate phylogenetic estimate and trust cannot be put on whole mitochondrial or chloroplast genome studies with only a few taxa, despite their high support values. The placental mammal example demonstrates that parsimony analysis will be prone to LBA by the attraction of the tenrec to the distant marsupial outgroups. In addition, the murid rodents, creating the classic “the guinea‐pig is not a rodent” hypothesis in 1996, are also shown to be attracted to the outgroup by nuclear genes, although including the morphological evidence for rodents and Glires overcomes the artifact. The gall wasp example illustrates that Bayesian analyses with a partition‐specific GTR + Γ + I model give a conflicting resolution of clades, with a posterior probability of 1.0 when comparing ingroup alone versus outgroup rooted topologies, and this is due to long‐branch attraction to the outgroup. © The Willi Hennig Society 2005.     

Resolution of portions of the kangaroo phylogeny (Marsupialia: Macropodidae) using DNA hybridization

We generated a DNA hybridization matrix comparing eleven 'true' kangaroos (Macropodinae) and two outgroup marsupials, the rufous rat-kangaroo Aepyprymnus rufescens (Potoroinae) and the brush-tailed phalanger Trichosurus vulpecula (Phalangeridae). A small matrix included additional species of the genus Macropus (large kangaroos and wallabies). The results indicate that the New Guinean forest wallaby Dorcopsulus vanheurni, and the quokka Setonix brachyurus, represent successively closer sister-groups of other macropodines. The remaining taxa examined form two clades: the tree kangaroo Dendrolagus matschiei with die pademelons Thylogale and rock wallabies Petrogale, and Macropus including the swamp wallaby Wallabia bicolor. The smaller matrix of five Macropus species and Wallabia (with Dorcopsulus as an outgroup) pairs the red-necked wallaby M. rufogriseus and Parry's wallaby M. parryi, with the eastern grey kangaroo M. giganteus as their nearest relative; and associates the red kangaroo M. rufus and wallaroo M. robustus, with Wallabia as their sister-taxon. In the larger study, we found mat inclusion of both outgroups provided little resolution among the macropodines, judging by jackknife and bootstrap tests. When Aepyprymnus was deleted, the Dendrolagus-Thylogale-Petrogale association obtained; with Trichosurus eliminated instead, the Wallabia-Macropus group was recovered. Only analysis of the eleven ingroup taxa by themselves gave a topology which supported both major clades. Our findings suggest that, at least for DNA hybridization studies, when ingroup taxa are separated by very short internodes experimental error in outgroup-to-ingroup distances may seriously compromise determination of ingroup affinities as well as the position of the root. We recommend that in such cases separate analyses with the outgroups sequentially eliminated and rigorous validation of die topology at each step should be conducted.     

Phylogenetics of Chondrichthyes and the problem of rooting phylogenies with distant outgroups

Erroneous estimates of ingroup relationships can be caused by attributes in the outgroup chosen to root the tree. Phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences frequently yield incorrect estimates of ingroup relationships when the outgroup used to "root" the tree is highly divergent from the ingroup. This is especially the case when the outgroup has a different base composition than the ingroup. Unfortunately, in many instances, alternative less divergent outgroups are not available. In such cases, investigators must either target genes with attributes that minimize the problem (slowly evolving genes with stationary base compositions--which are often not ideal for estimating relationships among the more closely related ingroup taxa) or use inference models that are explicitly tailored to deal with an attenuated historical signal with a superimposed non-stationary base composition. In this paper we explore the problem both empirically and through simulation. For the empirical component we looked at the phylogenetic relationships among elasmobranch fishes (sharks and rays), a group whose closest living outgroup, the holocephalan Ghost fishes, are separated from the elasmobranchs by more than 100 million years of evolution. We compiled a data set for analysis comprising 10 single-copy nuclear protein-coding genes (12,096 bp) for representatives of the major lineages within elasmobranchs and holocephalans. For the simulation, we used an evolutionary model on a fixed tree topology to generate DNA sequence data sets which varied both in their distance to the outgroup, and in their base compositional difference between ingroup and outgroup. Results from both the empirical data set and the simulation, support the idea that deviation from base compositional stationarity, in conjunction with distance from the root can act in concert to compromise accuracy of estimated relationships within the ingroup. We tested several approaches to mitigate such problems. We found, that excluding genes with overall faster rates and heterogeneous base compositions, while the least sophisticated of the methods evaluated, seemed to be the most effective.     

外群选择对隧蜂科（膜翅目：蜜蜂总科）系统重建的影响

外群用于给树附根和推断祖先性状状态。通常,来自内群的姐妹群中的多个分类单元被共同选择作为外群。为了在经验上验证这一方法, 我们采用了3种外群选择策略： 姐妹群中的单一分类单元, 姐妹群中的多个分类单元和连续姐妹群中的多个分类单元。以隧蜂科（膜翅目： 蜜蜂总科）的系统发育重建为例, 我们评估了这3种策略对树拓扑结构的影响, 包括最大似然树、 最大简约树和贝叶斯树。初步结果表明： 相比其他两种策略, 采用姐妹群中的多个分类单元作为外群更有利于系统发育重建得到现已被广泛认可的隧蜂科系统发育关系; 相比最大似然法和贝叶斯法, 虽然隧蜂科系统发育关系没有被很好地解决, 但最大简约法在不同外群选择策略下得到了较为一致的拓扑结构     

Phylogenetics of Coenonymphina (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) and the problem of rooting rapid radiations

We report a rapid radiation of a group of butterflies within the family Nymphalidae and examine some aspects of popular analytical methods in dealing with rapid radiations. We attempted to infer the phylogeny of butterflies belonging to the subtribe Coenonymphina sensu lato using five genes (4398 bp) with Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian analyses. Initial analyses suggested that the group has undergone rapid speciation within Australasia. We further analyzed the dataset with different outgroup combinations the choice of which had a profound effect on relationships within the ingroup. Modelling methods recovered Coenonymphina as a monophyletic group to the exclusion of Zipaetis and Orsotriaena, irrespective of outgroup combination. Maximum Parsimony occasionally returned a polyphyletic Coenonymphina, with Argyronympha grouping with outgroups, but this was strongly dependent on the outgroups used. We analyzed the ingroup without any outgroups and found that the relationships inferred among taxa were different from those inferred when either of the outgroup combinations was used, and this was true for all methods. We also tested whether a hard polytomy is a better hypothesis to explain our dataset, but could not find conclusive evidence. We therefore conclude that the major lineages within Coenonymphina form a near-hard polytomy with regard to each other. The study highlights the importance of testing different outgroups rather than using results from a single outgroup combination of a few taxa, particularly in difficult cases where basal nodes appear to receive low support. We provide a revised classification of Coenonymphina; Zipaetis and Orsotriaena are transferred to the tribe Eritina.     

Hypothetical Ancestors and Rooting in Cladistic Analysis

Most hypothetical ancestors that are used to root trees in cladistic analyses summarize character-state information in one or more outgroup taxa. Nonetheless, hypothetical ancestors also provide a means of rooting trees using the ontogenetic and paleontological methods of polarizing character transformations, and for incorporating the inferences of more than one of these methods into a single analysis. However, the use of one hypothetical ancestor that combines inferences based on outgroup comparison with those based on other methods of polarizing character transformations to root a cladogram is invalid. Inferences regarding plesiomorphic character states based on outgroup comparison apply to the outgroup node, whereas inferences based on either the ontogenetic or paleontological method apply to the ingroup node. These inferences cannot be combined into a single hypothetical construct. A hypothetical ancestor based on outgroup information is included in the data matrix and used to root the resulting network; however, because this ancestor places potentially problematic constraints on the analysis, the use of actual outgroup taxa is preferable in most instances. Correct use of a hypothetical ancestor inferred with the ontogenetic and paleontological methods involves the Lundberg method in which the shortest ingroup network is rooted at the internode to which the hypothetical ancestor attaches most parsimoniously. Because inferences of polarity based on outgroup comparison cannot be combined directly with those based on other polarization methods, the synthesis of information from all three methods in a single tree must involve taxonomic congruence.     

Limitations of relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA) for measuring phylogenetic signal.

In this paper we use hypothetical and empirical data matrices to evaluate the ability of relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA) to measure phylogenetic signal, select outgroups, and identify terminals subject to long-branch attraction. In all cases, except for equal character-state frequencies, RASA indicated extraordinarily high levels of phylogenetic information for hypothetical data matrices that are uninformative regarding relationships among the terminals. Yet, regardless of the number of characters or character-state frequencies, RASA failed to detect phylogenetic signal for hypothetical matrices with strong phylogenetic signal. In our empirical example, RASA indicated increasing phylogenetic signal for matrices for which the strict consensus of the most parsimonious trees is increasingly poorly resolved, clades are increasingly poorly supported, and for which many relationships are in conflict with more widely sampled analyses. RASA is an ineffective approach to identify outgroup terminal(s) with the most plesiomorphic character states for the ingroup. Our hypothetical example demonstrated that RASA preferred outgroup terminals with increasing numbers of convergent character states with ingroup terminals, and rejected the outgroup terminal with all plesiomorphic character states. Our empirical example demonstrated that RASA, in all three cases examined, selected an ingroup terminal, rather than an outgroup terminal, as the best outgroup. In no case was one of the two outgroup terminals even close to being considered the optimal outgroup by RASA. RASA is an ineffective means of identifying problematic long-branch terminals. In our hypothetical example, RASA indicated a terminal as being a problematic long-branch terminal in spite of the terminal being on a zero-length branch and having no possibility of undergoing long-branch attraction with another terminal. RASA also failed to identify actual problematic long-branch terminals that did undergo long-branch attraction, but only after following Lyons-Weiler and Hoelzer's (1997) three-step process to identify and remove terminals subject to long-branch attraction. We conclude that RASA should not be used for any of these purposes.     

Outgroup sampling in phylogenetics: Severity of test and successive outgroup expansion

Outgroup sampling is a fundamental step in the design of phylogenetic analyses, independent of optimality criterion, taxonomic group, or source of evidence. Studies have demonstrated the efficient analysis of many thousands of terminals, all of which could be included in any empirical investigation, yet outgroup samples typically include only a small number of terminals. Most discussion of outgroup sampling centers on employing “correct” or “appropriate” outgroup terminals to increase “accuracy” or “reliability” by preventing “errors” such as long branch attraction and “incorrect” ingroup rooting. As an alternative, I develop a theory of outgroup sampling grounded in the logic of scientific discovery, whereby the objective is to test nested hypotheses of ingroup topology and character‐state transformation as severely as possible by incorporating outgroup terminals in unconstrained, simultaneous analysis, using background knowledge to select the terminals that have the greatest chance of refuting those hypotheses. This framework provides a logical basis for selecting outgroup taxa but does not provide grounds for limiting the outgroup sample, given that, ceteris paribus, testability and explanatory power increase with the inclusion of additional terminals. Therefore, I propose the ancillary procedure of successively expanding the outgroup sample until ingroup hypotheses become stable (insensitive) to increased sampling, with each expansion guided by the scientific objectives of outgroup sampling. This is a heuristic procedure that does not prevent more outgroup terminals from being sampled or guarantee that ingroup hypotheses will remain insensitive to further outgroup expansion, and it has no bearing on the objective support of a given hypothesis. Nevertheless, it provides an objective, empirical basis for limiting outgroup sampling in a given research cycle. I illustrate this procedure by examining the effect of successive outgroup expansion on the relationships among the poison frog genera Adelphobates, Dendrobates, and Oophaga.     

Selected characters of the copulatory organs in the land planarian family Bipaliidae and their taxonomic significance (Tricladida: Terricola)

Preliminary analysis was made of 76 species in the monotypic family Bipaliidae, for which the copulatory apparatus has been described. Four characters from the copulatory organs were selected: profile of the female organ (three character states), approachment of the ovovitelline ducts to the female organ (two states), shape of the penial papilla (two states), and shape of the male antrum wall (three states). Data were scored for five preliminary ingroup taxa, viz., the restricted genus Placocephalus, and four other a priori defined subgroups within the family, viz., the genus Bipalium sensu stricto and three other informal taxonomic groupings. An artificial outgroup taxon was constructed on the basis of character states generalized from the Geoplanidae subfamilies Caenoplaninae, Pelmatoplaninae and Rhynchodemidae subfamily Microplaninae. Analysis of the data matrix resulted in a single most parsimonious tree with the following topology: (outgroup (Placocephalus (Bipalium, group A (group B1, group B2)))). This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Phylogeny of the Nemertodermatida (Acoelomorpha, Platyhelminthes). A cladistic analysis

The Nemertodermatida is a small group of worms, regarded as an order of the Platyhelminthes. The group is of special systematic interest because of its putative basal phylogenetic position in the Platyhelminthes. The phylogeny of the Nemertodermatida was estimated using paup 4.0 software for parsimony analysis. The analysis was based on 72 structural parsimony-informative characters totalling 184 different character states. All eight well described species of nemertodermatids were included in the ingroup. As outgroup were chosen species of the Acoela, Catenulida, Macrostomida and Xenoturbellida. A single most parsimonious tree was obtained with 140 steps and a consistency index (CI) of 0.80. The Nemertodermatida, Ascoparidae and Nemertodermatidae are shown as monophyletic taxa in the tree. The species Nemertoderma psammicola does not group with the other members of the genus Nemertoderma , hence criteria of phylogenetic taxonomy imply that N. psammicola should be renamed. A suggested new name is Sterreria psammicola gen. n .     

Phylogeny and systematics of the subfamily Bryocorinae based on morphology with emphasis on the tribe Dicyphini sensu Schuh,

The classification of the hyperdiverse true bug family Miridae is far from settled, and is particularly contentious for the cosmopolitan subfamily Bryocorinae. The morphological diversity within the subfamily is pronounced, and a lack of explicit character formulation hampers stability in the classification. Molecular partitions are few and only a handful of taxa have been sequenced. In this study the phylogeny of the subfamily Bryocorinae has been analysed based on morphological data alone, with an emphasis on evaluating the tribe Dicyphina sensu Schuh, 1976, within which distinct groups of taxa exist. A broad sample of taxa was examined from each of the bryocorine tribes. A broad range of outgroup taxa from most of the other mirid subfamilies was also examined to test for bryocorine monophyly, ingroup relationships and to determine character polarity. In total a matrix comprising 44 ingroup, 15 outgroup taxa and 111 morphological characters was constructed. The phylogenetic analysis resulted in a monophyletic subfamily Bryocorinae sensu Schuh (1976, 1995), except for the genus Palaucoris, which is nested within Cylapinae. The tribe Dicyphini sensu Schuh (1976, 1995) has been rejected. The subtribe Odoniellina is synonymized with the subtribe Monaloniina and the subtribes Dicyphina, Monaloniina and Eccritotarsina are now elevated to tribal level, with the Dicyphini now restricted in composition and definition. The genus Felisacus is highly autapomorphic and a new tribe – the Felisacini – is erected for the included taxa. This phylogeny of the tribes of the Bryocorinae comprises the following sister‐group relationships: Dicyphini ((Bryocorini + Eccritotarsini)(Felisicini + Monaloniini)).     

Rooting with Multiple Outgroups: Consensus Versus Parsimony

Using outgroup(s) is the most frequent method to root trees. Rooting through unconstrained simultaneous analysis of several outgroups is a favoured option because it serves as a test of the supposed monophyly of the ingroup. When contradiction occurs among the characters of the outgroups, the branching pattern of basal nodes of the rooted tree is dependent on the order of the outgroups listed in the data matrix, that is, on the prime outgroup (even in the case of exhaustive search). Different equally parsimonious rooted trees (=cladograms) can be obtained by permutation of prime outgroups. An alternative to a common implicit practice (select one outgroup to orientate the tree) is that the accepted cladogram is the strict consensus of the different equally parsimonious rooted trees. The consensus tree is less parsimonious but is not hampered with extra assumption such as the choice of one outgroup (or more) among the initial number of outgroup terminals. It also does not show sister-group relations that are ambiguously resolved or not resolved at all.     

Random roots and lineage sorting

Lineage sorting has been suggested as a major force in generating incongruent phylogenetic signal when multiple gene partitions are examined. The degree of lineage sorting can be estimated using the coalescent process and simulation studies have also pointed to a major role for incomplete lineage sorting as a factor in phylogenetic inference. Some recent empirical studies point to an extreme role for this phenomenon with up to 50-60% of all informative genes showing incongruence as a result of lineage sorting. Here, we examine seven large multi-partition genome level data sets over a large range of taxonomic representation. We took the approach of examining outgroup choice and its impact on tree topology, by swapping outgroups into analyses with successively larger genetics distances to the ingroup. Our results indicate a linear relationship of outgroup distance with incongruence in the data sets we examined suggesting a strong random rooting effect. In addition, we attempted to estimate the degree of lineage sorting in several large genome level data sets by examining triads of very closely related taxa. This exercise resulted in much lower estimates of incongruent genes that could be the result of lineage sorting, with an overall estimate of around 10% of the total number of genes in a genome showing incongruence as a result of true lineage sorting. Finally we examined the behavior of likelihood and parsimony approaches on the random rooting phenomenon. Likelihood tends to stabilize incongruence as outgroups get further and further away from the ingroup. In one extreme case, likelihood overcompensates for sequence divergence but increases random rooting causing long branch repulsion.     

Clade stability and the addition of data: A case study from erigonine spiders (Araneae: Linyphiidae, Erigoninae)

This study presents a new phylogeny of erigonine spiders with emphasis on genera from the Neotropics. Thirty‐nine exemplar taxa representing mostly Neotropical genera were added to a global sample of 31 erigonine and 12 outgroup exemplar taxa analyzed in a previous study. These 82 taxa were coded for 176 (172 informative) mostly morphological characters. Eighty‐one characters were identical to or modified from the 73 (67 informative) characters included in a previous study; the remaining 95 characters are new. The complete data set includes 70 erigonine exemplars representing 65 genera, seven nonerigonine linyphiid exemplars, and five exemplars representing four araneoid families in the outgroup. Cladistic analysis resulted in a single most parsimonious tree (L =904, CI = 0.23, RI = 0.58; uninformative characters excluded: L = 900, CI = 0.23). This paper explores the implications of the new topology for the evolution of several characters of interest in erigonine evolution. The phylogeny implies that the desmitracheate condition is a synapomorphy of erigonines, with a reversal to the haplotracheate condition in one large clade within Erigoninae. We infer that the loss of the paracymbium in Neotropical erigonines occurred twice and may have progressed by different evolutionary pathways. Our phylogeny differs markedly from the previous cladistic hypothesis of erigonine relationships. We investigate how the addition of characters and taxa (alone and together) have altered the earlier hypothesis of erigonine phylogeny. We conclude that topological changes from the previous study to the current one are largely the result of adding and modifying characters, not adding taxa. Continuous Jackknife Function (CJF) analysis predicts that the inclusion of additional character data will continue to imply changes in the relationships among taxa in our analysis.     

Phylogeny of the bees of the family Apidae based on larval characters with focus on the origin of cleptoparasitism (Hymenoptera: Apiformes)

Abstract.  Fifty-four genera of the bee family Apidae comprising almost all tribes were analysed based on 77 traditional and one new character of the mature larvae. Nine, especially cleptoparasitic species, were newly added. Analyses were performed by maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference. Trees inferred from the analysis of the complete dataset were rooted by taxa from the families Melittidae and Megachilidae. Unrooted trees inferred from the analysis of the partial dataset (excluding outgroup taxa) are also presented to preclude possible negative effects of the outgroup on the topology of the ingroup. Only the subfamily Nomadinae was statistically well supported. The monophyly of the subfamilies Xylocopinae and Apinae was not topologically recovered. The monophyly of the tribe Tetrapediini was supported, and this tribe was found to be related to xylocopine taxa. At the very least, larval morphology suggests that Tetrapedia is not a member of the subfamily Apinae. Our analyses support the monophyly of the Eucerine line (Emphorini, Eucerini, Exomalopsini, Tapinotaspidini) and of the Apine line (Anthophorini, Apini, Bombini, Centridini, Euglossini, Meliponini). All analyses support the monophyly of totally cleptoparasitic tribes of the subfamily Apinae. We named this group the Melectine line (Ericrocidini, Isepeolini, Melectini, Osirini, Protepeolini, Rhathymini). In previous studies all these cleptoparasitic tribes were considered independent evolutionary lineages. Our results suggest that their similarities with hosts in morphology and pattern are probably the result of convergence and host–parasite co-evolution than phylogenetic affinity. According to the present analysis, the cleptoparasitism has evolved independently only six times within the family Apidae.     

Head capsule characters in the Hymenoptera and their phylogenetic implications

The head capsule of a taxon sample of three outgroup and 86 ingroup taxa is examined for characters of possible phylogenetic significance within Hymenoptera. 21 morphological characters are illustrated and scored, and their character evolution explored by mapping them onto a phylogeny recently produced from a large morphological data set. Many of the characters are informative and display unambiguous changes. Most of the character support demonstrated is supportive at the superfamily or family level. In contrast, only few characters corroborate deeper nodes in the phylogeny of Hymenoptera.     

NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE PHYLOGENY AND RANDOM OUTGROUPS

Abstract— When divergent taxa are used to root networks, it is assumed that the character stales in the outgroup have historical similarity to those in the ingroup. Yet, if the data are nucleic acid sequences, the character stales shared by a divergent outgroup may be based not on history but on random similarity. A simple procedure is proposed to test this possibility. In the absence of an appropriate outgroup, root position can be estimated with the use of an asymmetrical character transformation matrix. If the matrix is sufficiently biased, it can supply the polarity information usually derived from an outgroup. This outgroup test and rooting procedure are demonstrated with ADH sequences from the genus Drosophila .