Breast reconstruction using tissue expanders and implants in Hodgkin's patients with prior mantle irradiation.

Women treated for Hodgkin's disease with mantle irradiation have an increased risk for developing breast cancer. Typically, breast malignancy in Hodgkin's patients presents bilaterally in a younger age group. Skin flap ischemia, poor skin expansion, implant extrusion, capsular contracture, and poor cosmesis are common sequelae of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction after breast irradiation for failed breast conservation therapy. This has led most surgeons to favor autologous tissue reconstruction in this setting. This study was performed to determine the efficacy of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients who have been treated with prior mantle irradiation for Hodgkin's disease. A retrospective analysis of all breast cancer patients with a history of Hodgkin's disease and mantle irradiation treated with mastectomy and tissue expander/implant reconstruction between 1992 and 1999 was performed. There were seven patients, with a mean age of 35 years (range, 28 to 42 years). The average interval between mantle irradiation and breast cancer diagnosis was 16 years (range, 12 to 23 years). All patients underwent two-stage reconstruction. Textured surface tissue expanders were placed in a complete submuscular position at the time of mastectomy. Expansion was initiated 2 weeks after insertion and continued on a weekly basis until completion. Expanders were replaced with textured surface saline-filled implants as a second stage. Patients were evaluated for skin flap ischemia, infection, quality of skin expansion, implant extrusion, capsular contracture, rippling, symmetry, and final aesthetic outcome. Breast cancer was bilateral in five patients and unilateral in two. Two patients did not undergo simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction because of metachronous cancer development. One of the patients had an initial transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction, followed by a tissue expander/implant reconstruction of the opposite breast. The average follow-up was 3 years. Complications were limited to one case of cellulitis after implant placement that resolved with intravenous antibiotics. There were no cases of skin flap ischemia, poor skin expansion, or implant extrusion. Overall patient satisfaction was high and revisions were not requested or required. Symmetry was best achieved with bilateral implants. This study demonstrates the efficacy of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction in patients treated with prior mantle irradiation. In this series, tissue expansion was reliable with low morbidity. Second-stage placement of permanent implants yielded good aesthetic results without significant capsular contracture. Mantle irradiation did not appear to compromise the prosthetic breast reconstruction. Tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction should remain a viable option in this category of irradiated patients.     

Immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expansion

Between October of 1983 and June of 1985, 31 patients underwent primary breast reconstruction with tissue expansion. Tissue expansion was utilized for breast reconstruction when the remaining muscle and skin following modified radical mastectomy was insufficient to accommodate a prosthesis that matched in size and shape the opposite breast. All expanders were placed beneath an investing muscular pocket created by elevating the pectoralis major and serratus anterior. Postoperative expansion began within 1 week, and the breast was expanded to double the volume of the opposite breast. Twenty-two patients have completed their reconstruction with a mean follow-up in 7 months. There were nine complications, including five deflations and four infections. All patients have remained Baker I or Baker II. Creating ptosis to match the breast was accomplished by placing the expander below the rectus fascia and superiorly advancing this expanded tissue at the time of prosthesis placement. Primary breast reconstruction with tissue expansion following modified radical mastectomy is safe, simple, and produces a breast with excellent shape, size, texture, and patient satisfaction.     

An accelerated approach to tissue expansion for breast reconstruction: experience with intraoperative and rapid postoperative expansion in 370 reconstructions

Breast reconstruction with tissue expansion is a well-established technique that offers satisfactory aesthetic results with minimal patient morbidity. The traditional period of expansion, however, continues to be a significant source of patient inconvenience and dissatisfaction. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a protocol for rapid tissue expansion. A total of 370 breast reconstructions in 314 patients who underwent rapid tissue expansion were retrospectively reviewed. Contraindications to rapid expansion were considered to be previous radiation, mastectomy skin flaps of questionable viability, and an excessively tight skin envelope. All expanders were placed submuscularly and filled to 40 to 50 percent of tissue expander volume. Office expansion was undertaken within 10 to 14 days after the operation and continued on a weekly basis. Each expansion was limited by patient tolerance up to a maximal pressure of 40 mm of water or a volume of 120 cm3. Expansion was considered complete once the expanded breast was 30 to 50 percent larger than the contralateral breast. If required, postoperative chemotherapy was given during the expansion period. Mean patient age was 48 years (range, 23 to 73 years). Two hundred fifty-eight patients had unilateral reconstructions. Three hundred two patients had immediate reconstruction. Mean tissue expander size was 583 cm3 (SD, 108 cm3). Mean intraoperative expansion was 271 cm3, or 46 percent (SD, 9 percent) of the tissue expander size. The first expansion was started 12 days (SD, 3 days) after the operation. The mean volume of each expansion was 88 cm3 (SD, 23 cm3). Expansion was completed in 4.7 office visits (SD, one visit). Mean final expander volume was 672 cm3 (SD, 144 cm3). The expanders were overexpanded by 15.3 percent (SD, 8.4 percent). The mean time between expander placement and the final expansion was 6.6 weeks (SD, 3 weeks). The overall complication rate was 4 percent. Ten patients developed cellulitis, five patients had hematomas requiring drainage, and one expander became exposed. A total of eight expanders were removed: four for cellulitis, one for a hematoma, one because of locally recurrent disease, one because of expander exposure, and one at the patient's request for no medical reason. Intraoperative and rapid postoperative tissue expansion is a safe and reliable technique that offers a significant improvement over conventional techniques. In this accelerated protocol, expansion may be completed in less than 7 weeks. The result is decreased patient morbidity and delays in adjuvant therapy at no detriment to the final surgical outcome.     

The premature removal of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction.

The role of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction is well established. Little information exists, however, regarding the incidence and etiology of premature removal of the tissue expander before planned exchange to a permanent breast implant. The purpose of this study was to review our 10-year experience with tissue expander breast reconstruction and identify factors relating to the premature removal of the tissue expander. This study is a retrospective review of 770 consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction with tissue expanders over the past 10 years. Breast reconstruction was immediate in 90 percent of patients. Patients were expanded weekly, and adjuvant chemotherapy was begun during the expansion process when required. Factors potentially affecting premature expander removal (chemotherapy, diabetes, obesity, radiation therapy, and smoking) were evaluated. Fourteen patients (1.8 percent) with a mean age of 47 years (range, 38 to 62 years) required premature removal of their tissue expander. Expanders were removed a mean of 3.2 months (0.1 to 8 months) after insertion. Causes for premature removal of the tissue expander included infection (7 patients), exposure (2), skin necrosis (2), patient dissatisfaction (2), and persistent breast cancer (1). Positive wound cultures were obtained in four of the seven infected patients (57 percent), requiring expander removal for infection. Tissue expanders were removed in 11 patients for complications directly related to the expander. Among these, six (55 percent) were receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, and one was a smoker. Diabetes, obesity, other concomitant medical illnesses, and prior mantle irradiation were not associated with expander removal. Premature removal of the tissue expander was required in only 1.8 percent of the patients in this series. Infection was the most common complication necessitating an unplanned surgical procedure to remove the expander. This study demonstrates that the use of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction is reliable, with the vast majority of patients completing the expansion process.     

Increased survival and vascularity of random-pattern skin flaps elevated in controlled, expanded skin

Controlled clinical tissue expansion, a new technique of providing donor tissue, results in an increase in surface area of expanded skin. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of controlled tissue expansion on the surviving lengths of random-pattern skin flaps elevated in expanded tissue. In five pigs the surviving lengths of flaps raised in skin expanded for 5 weeks using a 250-cc rectangular Radovan-type tissue expander were compared with the survival lengths of flaps elevated in tissue in which a similar prosthesis was not expanded, bipedicle flaps delayed for 5 weeks, and control acutely raised random-pattern flaps. The expanded flaps had a mean increase in surviving length of 117 percent over control flaps, which was statistically significant. The delay flaps had an increase in survival of 73 percent over control flaps, which was also statistically significant. There was no significant difference in survival between expanded flaps and delayed flaps. Morphologic studies using radiographic techniques on one pig demonstrated increased vascularity with tissue expansion. The results of this work demonstrate that in addition to providing increased surface area with controlled expansion, flaps raised in expanded skin have a significantly augmented surviving length. The mechanism for this increased vascularity with expansion is not known at this time, but it may be due to physical forces associated with expansion acting as a stimulus for angiogenesis.     

An Axisymmetric Computational Model of Skin Expansion and Growth

Skin expansion is the principal technique used in plastic surgery to repair large cutaneous defects, typically after tumour removal, burn care, craniofacial surgery and post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. It allows a gain of new tissue by means of gradual expansion of a prosthesis, surgically implanted beneath the patient’s skin. Nevertheless, wide clinical use is not supported by a deep quantitative knowledge of the phenomena occurring during the expansion. A finite element model of the skin expansion was developed to evaluate the stresses and the strains of the skin due to the expander inflation and validated by proper in vitro experiments; furthermore, a growth model based on the mechanical stimulus was implemented to estimate the skin area gain. The developed computational approach, composed of the skin expansion model interaction and the growth law, proved its validity to investigate skin expansion phenomena: its use suggests a new predictive tool to optimize clinical procedures and the expander devices’ design.     

Use of external reservoirs in tissue expansion

The use of tissue expanders having external reservoirs is presented. Twenty-four patients had 36 tissue expanders placed in the scalp, face, neck, upper limbs, chest, and lower limbs. All patients, apart from one, were taken to completion. This patient had erosion of the skin over expander and was only partially completed after removal of the expander. Apart from one instance of deflation at the end of the expansion where the skin could still be used, there were no other complications, in particular, no infections. The advantages of this technique are reduced operating time, ease of injection into the reservoir, lack of pain for the patient, early detection of reservoir or filling tube junction leakage, and lack of complications associated with the reservoir. This procedure is not recommended on at least theoretical grounds for breast expansion, where a permanent implant is to be inserted.     

Use of a permanent tissue expander for breast reconstruction

The use of tissue expansion in breast reconstruction is a recognized alternative surgical approach. The second generation of tissue-expanding prostheses is the permanent reverse double-lumen expander. In a series of 100 breast reconstructions using a permanent tissue expander, the clinical benefits of producing a moderate degree of mound ptosis along with observed reduction in pain during expansion are discussed. Additional advantages to the use of the device are the cost savings realized, elimination of a second procedure and a second anesthetic exposure, and a high degree of patient acceptance and satisfaction. This study includes breast reconstruction following mastectomies for malignant and premalignant disease, as demonstrated in 75 delayed and 25 immediate reconstructions, with the longest follow-up being 3 years. Complications of infection (3 percent), significant capsular contracture (4 percent), and implant failure (3 percent) are the most frequent and major complications observed yet. In no instance was breast reconstruction rendered unachievable in the face of these complications. The demonstrated results achieved with permanent tissue-expanding prosthesis, complemented by the obvious benefits and a low rate of significant complications, endorse this method as a viable alternative approach in reconstructive breast surgery.     

A method of reconstructing a pendulous breast utilizing the tissue expander

It is possible to reconstruct a breast mound of almost any size by utilizing tissue expansion. In order to produce a pendulous breast which is also ptotic, the tissue-expansion technique has been combined with two other procedures. A new technique is being introduced. It is that of elevating the lower third of the mature breast capsule surrounding the tissue expander at the time the permanent prosthesis is to be exchanged for the expander. The established techniques of inframammary fold reconstruction of Pennisi and Ryan are used to provide pedicle skin coverage for the undersurface of the breast and the bed of the elevated capsule. Internal and external surgical approaches are described, and two examples of each are illustrated. Breasts reconstructed in this manner have remained pendulous structures. Some loss of the initial degree of ptosis has been noted in some cases.     

Eighty-four consecutive breast reconstructions using a textured silicone tissue expander.

Breast reconstruction utilizing smooth-surface silicone tissue expanders is associated with certain problems. Significant capsular contracture may develop around the expander with subsequent expander displacement necessitating repositioning or capsulectomy at the time of expander removal. Infection, pain on expansion, chest-wall compression, and complications related to the remote fill valve also have been reported. A textured-surface silicone expander with an integrated fill valve was developed to address these issues. Eighty-four consecutive breast reconstructions were performed by a single surgeon using textured expanders in 55 patients. Intraexpander pressures were measured during expansion for a group of these patients, and both initial and postinflation pressure readings were quite low (average initial pressure 2.88 mmHg; average postinflation pressure 12.87 mmHg). Eighty-one of the reconstructions have been completed without any expander losses and with minimal complications. Tissue expander volume averaged 580 cc, and the expansion duration averaged 5.6 months. Various types and configurations of permanent implants were used to complete the reconstructions. Eighty-four percent of our patients' completed reconstructions (including nippleareola reconstruction and opposite breast alteration, when necessary) were accomplished with just two procedures. Seventeen long-term adjustable textured-surface expander/implants with anatomic breast shape are still in place, all after only one operation. The inframmary fold has generally been established passively by the expansion process alone. Textured-surface silicone expanders have stayed where positioned, have expanded easily with minimal patient pain, and have created a noncontractile soft-tissue cover for the final implant. The textured expander with an integrated fill valve has simplified breast reconstruction by helping to limit the problems encountered with smooth silicone expanders. The resulting reconstructions have remained soft with a very acceptable aesthetic appearance. The patient office and hospital charts and photographs of this consecutive series were notarized and submitted to the Editor of this Journal, whose biostatistician randomly selected the cases illustrated.     

Intraoperative tissue expansion in rhytidectomy revisited

Intraoperative tissue expansion is an adjunct that has been used during rhytidectomy to rejuvenate the face and neck. This technique has been thought to allow for additional skin resection and, thus, increased skin tightening during rhytidectomy. The stretch of the skin by expansion should allow for additional skin resection before closure. Also, when the force of the underlying expander is removed, the expanded skin would recoil and the advancement of the flap should become tighter, with improved results. The technique achieved some popularity a few years ago but has received little recent attention. In this study, the authors attempted to compare face-lift results of adjunctive intraoperative tissue expansion during rhytidectomy with similar techniques without intraoperative expansion. The results of 50 female patients who underwent rhytidectomy for midface rejuvenation by a single operating surgeon composed the study group. Twenty-five of the patients had undergone rhytidectomy that addressed the cheek, chin, and neck areas without expansion (nonexpanded rhytidectomy group). The other 25 patients (expanded rhytidectomy group) had adjunctive intraoperative tissue expansion performed with the rhytidectomy. A tissue expander was temporarily placed beneath the rhytidectomy flaps on each side and expanded in a standard manner before final skin resection and closure. Frontal and lateral photographs were evaluated by 54 examiners. Preoperative and postoperative photographs of the 50 patients were viewed side-by-side by the examiners. The patients were presented in blind fashion and random order. The examiners graded the results of each patient on a scale of improvement from 1 to 10, with 10 being the maximum level of improvement. The scores were recorded and statistically evaluated by using the two-sample test. Evaluation of the examiners' scores showed that the mean rating given to patients in the expanded rhytidectomy group was 5.07 (SD = 1.12). The mean rating for the nonexpanded rhytidectomy group was 5.27 (SD = 1.57). When the two groups were compared using the two-sample test, the difference between the two was not statistically significant (p = 0.6127). Intraoperative tissue expansion as an adjunct to rhytidectomy did not result in improved facial rejuvenation in this patient series. The authors' impression is that the benefits of tissue expansion do not justify the added expense, time, and risks associated with using tissue expansion during rhytidectomy.     

Breast reconstruction using modified tissue expansion

Inadequate chest-wall skin following mastectomy for carcinoma continues to be a problem in many breast reconstructions. To avoid extensive surgery, serial tissue expansion has been advocated. Since 1977, one of the authors has used a simple method of tissue expansion that we have termed "modified tissue expansion", defined as the creation of an adequate breast mound in one or two stages using a permanent prosthesis. Ninety percent of patients undergoing breast reconstruction between 1978 and 1983 were reconstructed using this method. A retrospective analysis of these 208 patients is presented. There were no mortalities, and only a 6.3 percent complication rate. Skin necroses related directly to the prosthesis occurred once, and there were no prosthetic deflations. Eighteen percent had first-step reconstruction only. The initial prosthesis averaged 400 cc in size. Selected Halsted radical mastectomy and postradiotherapy patients were successfully reconstructed. Seventy-eight percent felt their results were excellent at 1 year. Two percent were dissatisfied. Multiple office visits and the potential problems of serial expansion were avoided. Modified tissue expansion is a simple and viable method and should be considered among the options for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.     

The beginning of a new era in tissue expansion: self-filling osmotic tissue expander--four-year clinical experience

The osmotic tissue expander is a new device made of a hydrogel expanding skin that does not require external fillings. Once implanted, it absorbs body fluids, which leads to a gradual swelling of the device. The swelling phase is completed in 6 to 8 weeks and results in skin gain. Different shapes and sizes are available, and the devices can be used in almost every area of the body. Over a 4-year period, the osmotic tissue expander was used in 58 patients in different areas of the body. A round osmotic tissue expander was mainly used in breast reconstruction, and a rectangular expander was used for defect coverage after excision (i.e., of scars and tumors). The mean age of the patients was 49.34 years (range, 4 to 76 years). During the expansion phase, the patients noted only a little discomfort and pain for the first few days. Without a silicone membrane in the first-generation expander, the rate of successful explantation and good final result was 81.5 percent. In a few cases, rapid swelling of the device led to the introduction of a silicone membrane that encloses the expander and leads to a slower, more gradual, and consistent swelling. After introduction of the silicone envelope, the success rate improved to 91 percent. The expander is now used with a silicone membrane in every case. The osmotic tissue expander has many advantages compared with the conventional expander: there is no need for painful external fillings and the risk of external infections is avoided. The expander is 10 percent of its final volume and only requires a short incision and a small pocket. An operation can easily be performed under local anesthesia, with minimal tissue mobilization in older children and compliant patients.     

Effect of radiation on skin expansion and skin flap viability in pigs

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of radiation treatment both on skin tissue expansion with the chronic inflation of subcutaneous expanders and on skin flap viability in surgically delayed and expanded skin in the pig. One flank in each of six pigs (initially weighing 17 +/- 1.8 kg) was randomly assigned for radiation treatment, and the contralateral flank served as a nonirradiated control. Three mirror-image, 8 x 10 cm, rectangular templates were marked on each flank; these templates were randomly assigned to the construction of a delayed skin flap (group A), a skin flap raised on expanded skin (group B), or a skin flap raised on expanded skin with a capsulectomy before flap surgery (group C). Radiation treatment was performed using sequential radiation with three fractions per week (810 cGy/fraction) for 2 weeks, with a total dose of 4,860 cGy. Twelve weeks after radiation treatment, skin expanders (8 x 10 cm) were installed subcutaneously in the locations assigned for skin expansion. Skin expansion by the inflation of subcutaneous skin expanders with saline twice weekly was started 8 weeks later and lasted for 3 weeks. Two weeks after surgical delay and the last skin expansion, 8 x 20 cm skin flaps were raised on the locations assigned for delayed skin flaps, expanded skin flaps, and expanded skin flaps with a capsulectomy. Skin flap viability was assessed 24 hours later using a fluorescein dye-staining technique. Skin expansion by the inflation of subcutaneous expanders with saline was slower (p < 0.05) in the radiated skin (39 +/- 6 ml/filling) than in the nonirradiated control skin (51 +/- 6 ml/filling). Radiation reduced the overall area of expanded skin by 23 percent (p < 0.05) compared with the control. Radiation treatment also reduced skin viability by 36 percent (p < 0.05) in the delayed skin flaps, 27 percent (p = 0.10) in the expanded skin flaps, and 36 percent (p < 0.05) in the expanded skin flaps with a capsulectomy when compared with their contralateral, nonirradiated controls. There were no significant differences in skin viability among these three types of skin flaps within the radiated and nonirradiated groups. Taken together, these observations indicate that radiation treatment reduced the effectiveness of the surgical delay procedure, the amount of subcutaneous skin expansion (by an increase in skin area), and skin flap viability. However, a capsulectomy alone did not affect the viability of skin flaps raised on expanded skin.     

Breast reconstruction utilizing subcutaneous tissue expansion followed by polyurethane-covered silicone implants: a 6-year experience

Reconstruction of the breast after modified radical mastectomy can be safely and adequately performed in the subcutaneous plane. Placement of a subcutaneous tissue expander (as either an immediate or a delayed procedure), rapid expansion over a 3- to 4-month period, capsulotomy, and placement of a polyurethane-coated implant have led to satisfactory results over a 6-year period. Breast reconstruction methods are well documented; however, the utilization of expanded subcutaneous chest wall skin has not been reported heretofore.     

Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction

In patients with early-stage breast cancer who are scheduled to undergo mastectomy and desire breast reconstruction, the optimal timing of reconstruction depends on whether postmastectomy radiation therapy will be needed. Immediate reconstruction offers the best aesthetic outcomes if postmastectomy radiation therapy is not needed, but if postmastectomy radiation therapy is required, delayed reconstruction is preferable to avoid potential aesthetic and radiation-delivery problems. Unfortunately, the need for postmastectomy radiation therapy cannot be reliably determined until review of the permanent tissue sections. The authors recently implemented a two-stage approach, delayed-immediate breast reconstruction, to optimize reconstruction in patients at risk for requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy when the need for postmastectomy radiation therapy is not known at the time of mastectomy. Stage 1 consists of skin-sparing mastectomy with insertion of a completely filled textured saline tissue expander. After review of permanent sections, patients who did not require post-mastectomy radiation therapy underwent immediate reconstruction (stage 2) and patients who required postmastectomy radiation therapy completed postmastectomy radiation therapy and then underwent standard delayed reconstruction. In this study, the feasibility and outcomes of this approach were reviewed. Fourteen patients were treated with delayed-immediate reconstruction between May of 2002 and June of 2003. Twelve patients had unilateral reconstruction and two patients had bilateral reconstruction, for a total of 16 treated breasts. All patients completed stage 1. Tissue expanders were inserted subpectorally in 15 breasts and subcutaneously in one breast. The mean intraoperative expander fill volume was 475 cc (range, 250 to 750 cc). Three patients required postmastectomy radiation therapy and underwent delayed reconstruction. Eleven patients did not require postmastectomy radiation therapy. Nine patients had 11 breast reconstructions (stage 2), six with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps, one with a superior gluteal artery perforator flap, and four with a latissimus dorsi flap plus an implant. The median interval between stages was 13 days (range, 11 to 22 days). Two patients who did not require postmastectomy radiation therapy have not yet had stage 2 reconstruction, one because she wished to delay reconstruction and the other because she required additional tissue expansion before permanent implant placement. Six complications occurred. The stage 1 complications involved two cases of mastectomy skin necrosis in patients who required post-mastectomy radiation therapy; one patient required removal of the subcutaneously placed expander before postmastectomy radiation therapy and the other patient had a subpectorally placed expander that only required local wound care. The stage 2 complications were a recipient-site seroma in a patient with a latissimus dorsi flap, a recipient-site hematoma in the patient with the superior gluteal artery perforator flap, and two arterial thromboses in patients with TRAM flaps. Both TRAM flaps were salvaged. Delayed-immediate reconstruction is technically feasible and safe in patients with early-stage breast cancer who may require postmastectomy radiation therapy. With this approach, patients who do not require postmastectomy radiation therapy can achieve aesthetic outcomes essentially the same as those with immediate reconstruction, and patients who require postmastectomy radiation therapy can avoid the aesthetic and radiation-delivery problems that can occur after an immediate breast reconstruction.     

Postburn breast reconstruction: tissue expansion prior to contracture release.

Tissue expansion of the scarred chest following burns results in a poor breast mound shape with little projection or inframammary fold, since the expander, like normal developing breast tissue, is kept flat by the scarred skin envelope. We present a case that demonstrates that adequate projection of the breast and formation of an inframammary fold can be achieved by expansion if extensive release and skin grafting of contractures over the breast mound are performed after expansion. Maintained expansion will act as a stent reducing secondary contracture of the grafted-areas.     

Repair of scalp defects using a tissue expander and Marlex mesh.

A simple technique using Marlex mesh and a tissue expander to cover scalp defects is described and two patients are presented. This technique is suitable for medium-sized defects that cannot be closed primarily. Marlex mesh is sutured to the wound edges in lieu of a temporary skin graft and to prevent enlargement of the defect during tissue expansion. The tissue expander is placed under adjacent normal scalp in a subgaleal pocket developed through the scalp defect. The scalp defect is closed secondarily using the expanded scalp flap. This technique was performed in two patients with satisfactory results. Marlex mesh obviates the need for a temporary skin graft to cover the scalp defect.     

Influence of the Presence of Tissue Expanders on Energy Deposition for Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy

An increasing number of studies have shown that post-mastectomy radiotherapy presents benefits associated with the patients survival and a significant fraction of the treated patients makes use of tissue expanders for breast reconstruction. Some models of tissue expanders have a magnetic disk on their surface that constitutes heterogeneity in the radiation field, which can affect the dose distribution during the radiotherapy treatment. In this study, the influence of a metallic heterogeneity positioned in a breast tissue expander was evaluated by means of Monte Carlo simulations using the MCNPX code and using Eclipse treatment planning system. Deposited energy values were calculated in structures which have clinical importance for the treatment. Additionally, the effect in the absorbed energy due to backscattering and attenuation of the incident beam caused by the heterogeneity, as well as due to the expansion of the prosthesis, was evaluated in target structures for a 6 MV photon beam by simulations. The dose distributions for a breast treatment were calculated using a convolution/superposition algorithm from the Eclipse treatment planning system. When compared with the smallest breast expander volume, underdosage of 7% was found for the largest volume of breast implant, in the case of frontal irradiation of the chest wall, by Monte Carlo simulations. No significant changes were found in dose distributions for the presence of the heterogeneity during the treatment planning of irradiation with an opposed pair of beams. Even considering the limitation of the treatment planning system, the results obtained with its use confirm those ones found by Monte Carlo simulations for a tangent beam irradiation. The presence of a heterogeneity didńt alters the dose distributions on treatment structures. The underdosage of 7% observed with Monte Carlo simulations were found for irradiation at 0°, not used frequently in a clinical routine.     

Patient-activated controlled expansion for breast reconstruction with controlled carbon dioxide inflation: a feasibility study

This feasibility study represents the first report of a new carbon dioxide-based tissue expander designed to allow gradual controlled expansion and to eliminate the need for percutaneous injections. Seven patients underwent implantation with a total of 10 (three bilateral) tissue expanders. After intraoperative filling by the surgeon and wound healing, small doses of carbon dioxide were administered on a daily basis by the patient by means of a hand-held dosage controller leading to gradual, incremental expansion. Rapid expansion during the active dosing phase and flexibility to meet individual patient needs during expansion were demonstrated with all subjects. These patients achieved full expansion in an average of 15 days. All seven patients were able to use the device safely and with ease at home, leading to successful tissue expansion and permanent breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.