Antp-type homeodomains have distinct DNA binding specificities that correlate with their different regulatory functions in embryos.

Much of the functional specificity of Drosophila homeotic selector proteins, in their ability to regulate specific genes and to assign specific segmental identities, appears to map within their different, but closely related homeodomains. For example, the Drosophila Dfd and human HOX4B (Hox 4.2) proteins, which have extensive structural similarity only in their respective homeodomains, both specifically activate the Dfd promoter. In contrast, a chimeric Dfd protein containing the Ubx homeodomain (Dfd/Ubx) specifically activates the Antp P1 promoter, which is normally targeted by Ubx. Using a variety of DNA binding assays, we find significant differences in DNA binding preferences between the Dfd, Dfd/Ubx and Ubx proteins when Dfd and Antp upstream regulatory sequences are used as binding substrates. No significant differences in DNA binding specificity were detected between the human HOX4B (Hox 4.2) and Drosophila Dfd proteins. All of these full-length proteins bound as monomers to high affinity DNA binding sites, and interference assays indicate that they interact with DNA in a way that is very similar to homeodomain polypeptides. These experiments indicate that the ninth amino acid of the recognition helix of the homeodomain, which is glutamine in all four of these Antp-type homeodomain proteins, is not sufficient to determine their DNA binding specificities. The good correlation between the in vitro DNA binding preferences of these four Antp-type homeodomain proteins and their ability to specifically regulate a Dfd enhancer element in the embryo, suggests that the modest binding differences that distinguish them make an important contribution to their unique regulatory specificities.     

Interaction of the PHD-finger homeodomain protein HAT3.1 from Arabidopsis thaliana with DNA. Specific DNA binding by a homeodomain with histidine at position 51

HAT3.1 is a member of the PHD-finger homeodomain protein family. The HAT3.1 homeodomain is highly divergent in sequence even at positions that are almost invariable among homeodomains. In this work, we have applied the random oligonucleotide selection technique to investigate if the HAT3.1 homeodomain is able to recognize specific DNA sequences. Analysis of the selected molecules followed by hydroxyl radical footprinting experiments and yeast one-hybrid assays indicated that HAT3.1 shows a preference for the sequence T(A/G)(A/C)ACCA, different from those bound by other homeodomains. Binding was dependent on homeodomain residues located at positions 47, 50, 51, and 54, the same positions that usually participate in DNA binding in most homeodomains. The study of the interaction of mutants at these positions with DNA carrying nucleotide changes at specific sites suggested that H51 and K50 most likely interact with nucleotides 2 to 4 and 5 to 6, respectively, while W54 would establish contacts with position 4. The presence of H51 and W54 represents an innovation among homeodomain structures. The fact that the HAT3.1 homeodomain is able to interact with specific DNA sequences is evidence of the inherent plasticity of the homeodomain as a DNA binding unit.     

Cardiac-specific Nkx2.5 homeodomain: conformational stability and specific DNA binding of Nkx2.5(C56S)

The cardiac-specific Nkx2.5 homeodomain has been expressed as a 79-residue protein with the oxidizable Cys(56) replaced with Ser. The Nkx2.5 or Nkx2.5(C56S) homeodomain is 73% identical in sequence to and has the same NMR structure as the vnd (ventral nervous system defective)/NK-2 homeodomain of Drosophila when bound to the same specific DNA. The thermal unfolding of Nkx2.5(C56S) at pH 6.0 or 7.4 is a reversible, two-state process with unit cooperativity, as measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and far-UV circular dichroism. Adding 100 mM NaCl to Nkx2.5(C56S) at pH 7.4 increases T(m) from 44 to 54 +/- 0.2 degrees C and DeltaH from 34 to 45 +/- 2 kcal/mol (giving a DeltaC(p) of approximately 1.2 kcal K(-)(1) mol(-)(1) for homeodomain unfolding). DSC profiles of Nkx2.5 indicate fluctuating nativelike structures at <37 degrees C. Titrations of specific 18 bp DNA with Nkx2.5(C56S) in buffer at pH 7.4 with 100 mM NaCl yield binding constants of 2-6 x 10(8) M(-)(1) from 10 to 37 degrees C and a stoichiometry of 1:1 for homeodomain binding DNA, using isothermal titration calorimetry. The DNA binding reaction of Nkx2.5 is enthalpically controlled, and the temperature dependence of DeltaH gives a DeltaC(p) of -0.18 +/- 0.01 kcal K(-)(1) mol(-)(1). This corresponds to 648 +/- 36 A(2) of buried apolar surface upon Nkx2.5(C56S) binding duplex B-DNA. Thermodynamic parameters differ for Nkx2.5 and vnd/NK-2 homeodomains binding specific DNA. Unbound NK-2 is more flexible than Nkx2.5.     

The optimal binding sequence of the Hox11 protein contains a predicted recognition core motif.

HOX11 is a homeobox-containing oncogene of specific T-cell leukemias. We determined the DNA binding specificity of the Hox11 protein by using a novel technique of random oligonucleotide selection developed in this study. The optimal Hox11 binding sequence, GGCGGTAAGTGG, contained a core TAAGTG motif that is consistent with a prediction based on the residues at specific positions that potentially make DNA base contacts and models of homeodomain-DNA interaction proposed from studies with other homeodomains. The specific interaction between Hox11 and the selected optimal binding sequence was further confirmed by band-shift and DNA competition assays. Given that the Hox11 homeodomain shares low homology with other well studied homeodomains, the presence of a predictable recognition core motif in its optimal binding sequence supports the notion that different homeodomains interact with DNA in a similar manner, through highly conserved residues at specific positions that allow contact with DNA.     

Insights into nonspecific binding of homeodomains from a structure of MATalpha2 bound to DNA

The 2.1-A resolution crystal structure of the MATalpha2 homeodomain bound to DNA reveals the unexpected presence of two nonspecifically bound alpha2 homeodomains, in addition to the two alpha2 homeodomains bound to canonical alpha2 binding sites. One of the extra homeodomains makes few base-specific contacts, while the other extra homeodomain binds to DNA in a previously unobserved manner. This unusually bound homeodomain is rotated on the DNA, making possible major groove contacts by side-chains that normally do not contact the DNA. This alternate docking may represent one way in which homeodomains sample nonspecific DNA sequences.     

A single amino acid can determine the DNA binding specificity of homeodomain proteins

Many Drosophila developmental genes contain a DNA binding domain encoded by the homeobox. This homeodomain contains a region distantly homologous to the helix-turn-helix motif present in several prokaryotic DNA binding proteins. We investigated the nature of homeodomain-DNA interactions by making a series of mutations in the helix-turn-helix motif of the Drosophila homeodomain protein Paired (Prd). This protein does not recognize sequences bound by the homeodomain proteins Fushi tarazu (Ftz) or Bicoid (Bcd). We show that changing a single amino acid at the C-terminus of the recognition helix is both necessary and sufficient to confer the DNA binding specificity of either Ftz or Bcd on Prd. This simple rule indicates that the amino acids that determine the specificity of homeodomains are different from those mediating protein-DNA contacts in prokaryotic proteins. We further show that Prd contains two DNA binding activities. The Prd homeodomain is responsible for one of them while the other is not dependent on the recognition helix.     

Reprogrammable recognition codes in bicoid homeodomain-DNA interaction

We describe experiments to determine how the homeodomain of the Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid recognizes different types of DNA sequences found in natural enhancers. Our chemical footprint analyses reveal that the Bicoid homeodomain makes both shared and distinct contacts with a consensus site A1 (TAATCC) and a nonconsensus site X1 (TAAGCT). In particular, the guanine of X1 at position 4 (TAAGCT) is protected by Bicoid homeodomain. We provide further evidence suggesting that the unique arginine at position 54 (Arg 54) of the Bicoid homeodomain enables the protein to recognize X1 by specifically interacting with this position 4 guanine. We also describe experiments to analyze the contribution of artificially introduced Arg 54 to DNA recognition by other Bicoid-related homeodomains, including that from the human disease protein Pitx2. Our experiments demonstrate that the role of Arg 54 varies depending on the exact homeodomain framework and DNA sequences. Together, our results suggest that Bicoid and its related homeodomains utilize distinct recognition codes to interact with different DNA sequences, underscoring the need to study DNA recognition by Bicoid-class homeodomains in an individualized manner.     

Variation in homeodomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences

Most homeodomains are unique within a genome, yet many are highly conserved across vast evolutionary distances, implying strong selection on their precise DNA-binding specificities. We determined the binding preferences of the majority (168) of mouse homeodomains to all possible 8-base sequences, revealing rich and complex patterns of sequence specificity and showing that there are at least 65 distinct homeodomain DNA-binding activities. We developed a computational system that successfully predicts binding sites for homeodomain proteins as distant from mouse as Drosophila and C. elegans, and we infer full 8-mer binding profiles for the majority of known animal homeodomains. Our results provide an unprecedented level of resolution in the analysis of this simple domain structure and suggest that variation in sequence recognition may be a factor in its functional diversity and evolutionary success.     

A phage display selection of engrailed homeodomain mutants and the importance of residue Q50

Mutants of engrailed homeodomain (HD) that retain DNA-binding activity were isolated using a phage display selection. This selection was used to enrich for active DNA-binding clones from a complex library consisting of over a billion members. A more focused library of mutant homeodomains consisting of all possible amino acid combinations at two DNA-contacting residues (I47 and Q50) was constructed and screened for members capable of binding tightly and specifically to the engrailed consensus sequence, TAATTA. The isolated mutants largely recapitulated the distribution of amino acids found at these positions in natural homeodomains thus validating the in vitro selection conditions. In particular, the unequivocal advantage enjoyed by glutamine at residue 50 is surprising in light of reports that minimize the importance of this residue. Here, the subtle contributions of residue Q50 are demonstrated to play a functionally important role in specific recognition of DNA. These results highlight the complex subtlety of protein–DNA interactions, underscoring the value of the first reported in vitro selection of a homeodomain.     

同源异形域结构及对DNA的识别

同源异形域蛋白是真核生物中一类重要的转录因子.根据同源盒基因及其同源异形域产物的肤链结构可以分为多种家族.文章综述了同源异形域与DNA结合的一般特点.并叙述了Antp、POU等重要类型的转录因子如何识别DNA位点、HTH及其他蛋白质在识别中如何起作用.     

Interaction of the BELL-like protein ATH1 with DNA: role of homeodomain residue 54 in specifying the different binding properties of BELL and KNOX proteins

We have studied the interaction of the BELL-like Arabidopsis homeodomain protein ATH1 with DNA. Analysis of oligonucleotides selected by the ATH1 homeodomain from a random mixture suggests that ATH1 preferentially binds the sequence TGACAGGT. Single nucleotide replacements at positions 2 or 3 of this sequence abolish binding, while changes at position 4 are more tolerated. Changes outside this core differentially affect binding, depending on the position. Hydroxyl radical footprinting and missing nucleoside experiments showed that ATH1 interacts with a 7-bp region of the strand carrying the GAC core. On the other strand, protection was observed over a 7-bp region, comprising one additional nucleotide complementary to T in position 1. A comparative analysis of the binding preferences of the homeodomains of ATH1 and STM (a KNOX homeodomain protein) indicated that they bind similar sequences, but with differences in affinity and specificity. The decreased affinity displayed by the ATH1 homeodomain correlates with the presence of valine (instead of lysine as in STM) at position 54. This difference also explains the decreased and increased selectivities, respectively, at positions 4 and 5. Our results point to an essential role of residue 54 in determining the different binding properties of BELL and KNOX homeodomains.