Modification of histone binding in calf thymus chromatin by protamine.

When calf thymus chromatin is incubated with protamine, the protein binds to DNA, forming a chromatin-protamine complex. The binding reaches a saturating level at the weight ratio of protamine to DNA of approximately 0.5. Although the saturated binding of protamine to DNA does not cause major displacement of histones from calf thymus chromatin, examination of the dissociation profiles by salt in combination with urea of protamine-treated chromatin shows that the histone-DNA interactions are markedly altered by such binding. The dissociation of histones from the chromatin-protamine complex requires less NaCl but the same concentration of urea as that for untreated chromatin, suggesting that the electorstatic interactions between the histones and DNA are decreased as a result of protamine binding. When protamine concentration is increased beyond that required for saturated binding to DNA during in vitro exposure of calf thymus chromatin to protamine, lysine-rich histone is completely displaced.     

Nucleosome positioning signals in the DNA sequence of the human and mouse H19 imprinting control regions

We have investigated the sequences of the mouse and human H19 imprinting control regions (ICRs) to see whether they contain nucleosome positioning information pertinent to their function as a methylation-regulated chromatin boundary. Positioning signals were identified by an in vitro approach that employs reconstituted chromatin to comprehensively describe the contribution of the DNA to the most basic, underlying level of chromatin structure. Signals in the DNA sequence of both ICRs directed nucleosomes to flank and encompass the short conserved sequences that constitute the binding sites for the zinc finger protein CTCF, an essential mediator of insulator activity. The repeat structure of the human ICR presented a conserved array of strong positioning signals that would preferentially flank these CTCF binding sites with positioned nucleosomes, a chromatin structure that would tend to maintain their accessibility. Conversely, all four CTCF binding sites in the mouse sequence were located close to the centre of positioning signals that were stronger than those in their flanks; these binding sites might therefore be expected to be more readily incorporated into positioned nucleosomes. We found that CpG methylation did not effect widespread repositioning of nucleosomes on either ICR, indicating that allelic methylation patterns were unlikely to establish allele-specific chromatin structures for H19 by operating directly upon the underlying DNA-histone interactions; instead, epigenetic modulation of ICR chromatin structure is likely to be mediated principally at higher levels of control. DNA methylation did, however, both promote and inhibit nucleosome positioning at several sites in both ICRs and substantially negated one of the strongest nucleosome positioning signals in the human sequence, observations that underline the fact that this epigenetic modification can, nevertheless, directly and decisively modulate core histone-DNA interactions within the nucleosome.     

HMGN dynamics and chromatin function.

Recent studies indicate that most nuclear proteins, including histone H1 and HMG are highly mobile and their interaction with chromatin is transient. These findings suggest that the structure of chromatin is dynamic and the protein composition at any particular chromatin site is not fixed. Here we discuss how the dynamic behavior of the nucleosome binding HMGN proteins affects the structure and function of chromatin. The high intranuclear mobility of HMGN insures adequate supply of protein throughout the nucleus and serves to target these proteins to their binding sites. Transient interactions of the proteins with nucleosomes destabilize the higher order chromatin, enhance the access to nucleosomal DNA, and impart flexibility to the chromatin fiber. While roaming the nucleus, the HMGN proteins encounter binding partners and form metastable multiprotein complexes, which modulate their chromatin interactions. Studies with HMGN proteins underscore the important role of protein dynamics in chromatin function.     

Interaction of the non-histone protein PS1 with some chromatin components

The binding of non-histone protein from mouse spleen chromatin located in the sites highly sensitive to micrococcal nuclease and DNA-ase I, to DNA and histones was studied. The binding of the DNA-protein complexes to nitrocellulose filters demonstrated the absence of protein binding to DNA. A highly selective binding of protein PS1 to histones H1 and H2A and to one of the non-histone proteins (presumably HMG 14) was revealed. It is concluded that protein PS1 is incorporated into chromatin by the protein-protein interactions.     

In vitro interaction of 63-nickel(II) with chromatin and DNA from rat kidney and liver nuclei

The interaction of nickel(II) with chromatin was studied in vitro and in isolated nuclei from rat liver and kidney. Nickel(II) bound to chromatin, polynucleosomes (DNA + histone octamer protein complex), and to deproteinized DNA both in intact nuclei and in vitro. The amount of nickel(II) bound depended on the concentration of nickel(II), the presence of chromosomal proteins and the binding sites on DNA which provide a stable coordination environment for nickel(II). The binding of nickel(II) to chromatin and to DNA in whole nuclei was much slower than in vitro indicating that assessibility of the DNA binding sites was influenced by the presence of the nuclear membrane, nuclear matrix and nuclear proteins and/or by the condensed nuclear structure of chromatin. Since DNA containing bound nickel(II) was isolated from chromatin, nickel(II) directly interacted with stable binding sites on the DNA molecule in chromatin. Nickel(II) was associated with the histone and non-histone nuclear proteins as well as the DNA in rat liver and kidney chromatin. Nickel(II) was found to bind to calf thymus histones in vitro. Nickel(II)-nuclear protein and -DNA interactions were investigated by gel electrophoretic analysis of in vitro incubation products. Although nickel-histone and nickel-non-histone protein interactions were completely disrupted by the electrophoretic conditions, fluorography revealed the presence of inert nickel(II)-DNA and/or nickel(II)-DNA-protein complexes.     

Structure-specific binding of the proto-oncogene protein DEK to DNA

The ubiquitous proto-oncogene protein DEK has been found to be associated with chromatin during the entire cell cycle. It changes the topology of DNA in chromatin and protein-free DNA through the introduction of positive supercoils. The sequence and structure specificities of DEK–DNA interactions are not completely understood. The binding of DEK to DNA is not sequence specific, but we describe here that DEK has a clear preference for supercoiled and four-way junction DNA. In the presence of topoisomerase II, DEK stimulates intermolecular catenation of circular DNA molecules. DEK also increases the probability of intermolecular ligation of linear DNA molecules by DNA ligase. These binding properties qualify DEK as an architectural protein.     

Structure of the chromatin binding (chromo) domain from mouse modifier protein 1.

The structure of a chromatin binding domain from mouse chromatin modifier protein 1 (MoMOD1) was determined using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The protein consists of an N-terminal three-stranded anti-parallel beta-sheet which folds against a C-terminal alpha-helix. The structure reveals an unexpected homology to two archaebacterial DNA binding proteins which are also involved in chromatin structure. Structural comparisons suggest that chromo domains, of which more than 40 are now known, act as protein interaction motifs and that the MoMOD1 protein acts as an adaptor mediating interactions between different proteins.     

The Drosophila modifier of variegation modulo gene product binds specific RNA sequences at the nucleolus and interacts with DNA and chromatin in a phosphorylation-dependent manner

modulo belongs to the modifier of Position Effect Variegation class of Drosophila genes, suggesting a role for its product in regulating chromatin structure. Genetics assigned a second function to the gene, in protein synthesis capacity. Bifunctionality is consistent with protein localization in two distinct subnuclear compartments, chromatin and nucleolus, and with its organization in modules potentially involved in DNA and RNA binding. In this study, we examine nucleic acid interactions established by Modulo at nucleolus and chromatin and the mechanism that controls the distribution and balances the function of the protein in the two compartments. Structure/function analysis and oligomer selection/amplification experiments indicate that, in vitro, two basic terminal domains independently contact DNA without sequence specificity, whereas a central RNA Recognition Motif (RRM)-containing domain allows recognition of a novel sequence-/motif-specific RNA class. Phosphorylation moreover is shown to down-regulate DNA binding. Evidence is provided that in vivo nucleolar Modulo is highly phosphorylated and belongs to a ribonucleoprotein particle, whereas chromatin-associated protein is not modified. A functional scheme is finally proposed in which modification by phosphorylation modulates Mod subnuclear distribution and balances its function at the nucleolus and chromatin.     

Does CTCF mediate between nuclear organization and gene expression?

The multifunctional zinc‐finger protein CCCTC‐binding factor (CTCF) is a very strong candidate for the role of coordinating the expression level of coding sequences with their three‐dimensional position in the nucleus, apparently responding to a “code” in the DNA itself. Dynamic interactions between chromatin fibers in the context of nuclear architecture have been implicated in various aspects of genome functions. However, the molecular basis of these interactions still remains elusive and is a subject of intense debate. Here we discuss the nature of CTCF‐DNA interactions, the CTCF‐binding specificity to its binding sites and the relationship between CTCF and chromatin, and we examine data linking CTCF with gene regulation in the three‐dimensional nuclear space. We discuss why these features render CTCF a very strong candidate for the role and propose a unifying model, the “CTCF code,” explaining the mechanistic basis of how the information encrypted in DNA may be interpreted by CTCF into diverse nuclear functions.     

Holocarboxylase synthetase synergizes with methyl CpG binding protein 2 and DNA methyltransferase 1 in the transcriptional repression of long-terminal repeats

Holocarboxylase synthetase (HLCS) is a chromatin protein that facilitates the creation of histone H3 lysine 9-methylation (H3K9me) gene repression marks through physical interactions with the histone methyltransferase EHMT-1. HLCS knockdown causes a depletion of H3K9me marks in mammalian cell cultures and severe phenotypes such as short lifespan and low stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. HLCS displays a punctuate distribution pattern in chromatin despite lacking a strong DNA-binding domain. Previous studies suggest that the binding of HLCS to chromatin depends on DNA methylation. We tested the hypothesis that HLCS interacts physically with the DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 and the methyl CpG binding protein MeCP2 to facilitate the binding of HLCS to chromatin, and that these interactions contribute toward the repression of long-terminal repeats (LTRs) by H3K9me marks. Co-immunoprecipitation and limited proteolysis assays provided evidence suggesting that HLCS interacts physically with both DNMT1 and MeCP2. The abundance of H3K9me marks was 207% greater in the LTR15 locus in HLCS overexpression human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells compared with controls. This gain in H3K9me was inversely linked with a 87% decrease in mRNA coding for LTRs. Effects of HLCS abundance on LTR expression were abolished when DNA methylation marks were erased by treating cells with 5-azacytidine. We conclude that interactions between DNA methylation and HLCS are crucial for mediating gene repression by H3K9me, thereby providing evidence for epigenetic synergies between the protein biotin ligase HLCS and dietary methyl donors.     

Fission yeast Cdc23/Mcm10 functions after pre-replicative complex formation to promote Cdc45 chromatin binding

Using a cytological assay to monitor the successive chromatin association of replication proteins leading to replication initiation, we have investigated the function of fission yeast Cdc23/Mcm10 in DNA replication. Inactivation of Cdc23 before replication initiation using tight degron mutations has no effect on Mcm2 chromatin association, and thus pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) formation, although Cdc45 chromatin binding is blocked. Inactivating Cdc23 during an S phase block after Cdc45 has bound causes a small reduction in Cdc45 chromatin binding, and replication does not terminate in the absence of Mcm10 function. These observations show that Cdc23/Mcm10 function is conserved between fission yeast and Xenopus, where in vitro analysis has indicated a similar requirement for Cdc45 binding, but apparently not compared with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where Mcm10 is needed for Mcm2 chromatin binding. However, unlike the situation in Xenopus, where Mcm10 chromatin binding is dependent on Mcm2-7, we show that the fission yeast protein is bound to chromatin throughout the cell cycle in growing cells, and only displaced from chromatin during quiescence. On return to growth, Cdc23 chromatin binding is rapidly reestablished independently from pre-RC formation, suggesting that chromatin association of Cdc23 provides a link between proliferation and competence to execute DNA replication.     

The gypsy insulator of Drosophila affects chromatin structure in a directional manner.

Chromatin insulators are thought to regulate gene expression by establishing higher-order domains of chromatin organization, although the specific mechanisms by which these sequences affect enhancer-promoter interactions are not well understood. Here we show that the gypsy insulator of Drosophila can affect chromatin structure. The insulator itself contains several DNase I hypersensitive sites whose occurrence is dependent on the binding of the Suppressor of Hairy-wing [Su(Hw)] protein. The presence of the insulator in the 5' region of the yellow gene increases the accessibility of the DNA to nucleases in the promoter-proximal, but not the promoter-distal, region. This increase in accessibility is not due to alterations in the primary chromatin fiber, because the number and position of the nucleosomes appears to be the same in the presence or absence of the insulator. Binding of the Su(Hw) protein to insulator DNA is not sufficient to induce changes in chromatin accessibility, and two domains of this protein, presumed to be involved in interactions with other insulator components, are essential for this effect. The presence of Modifier of mdg4 [Mod(mdg4)] protein, a second component of the gypsy insulator, is required to induce these alterations in chromatin accessibility. The results suggest that the gypsy insulator affects chromatin structure and offer insights into the mechanisms by which insulators affect enhancer-promoter interactions.     

Interaction of Simian Virus 40 chromatin with Simian Virus 40 T-antigen.

We have studied the binding of the tumor antigen (T-antigen) of simian virus 40 to simian virus 40 chromatin (minichromosomes). The minichromosomes isolated from infected cells by a modification of standard techniques were relatively free of contaminating RNA and cellular DNA and had a ratio (by weight) of protein to DNA of approximately 1; their DNA was 50 to 60% digestible to an acid-soluble form by staphylococcal nuclease. Cleavage of this chromatin with restriction endonucleases indicated that the nuclease-resistant regions were randomly distributed in the population of minichromosomes, but were not randomly distributed within minichromosomes. Only 20 to 35% of these minichromosomes adsorbed nonspecifically to nitrocellulose filters, permitting binding studies between simian virus 40 T-antigen and chromatin to be performed. Approximately two to three times as much T-antigen was required to bind chromatin as to bind an equivalent amount of free DNA. When T-antigen was present in excess, both chromatin and free DNA were quantitatively retained on the filters. On the other hand, when DNA or chromatin was present in excess, only one-third as much chromatin as DNA was retained. We suggest that T-antigen-chromatin complexes may be formed by the cooperative binding of T-antigen to chromatin, whereas T-antigen-DNA complexes may be formed by simple bimolecular interactions.     

Noncovalent interactions of poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) with histones.

Covalent linkage of ADP-ribose polymers to proteins is generally considered essential for the posttranslational modification of protein function by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Here we demonstrate an alternative way by which ADP-ribose polymers may modify protein function. Using a highly stringent binding assay in combination with DNA sequencing gels, we found that ADP-ribose polymers bind noncovalently to a specific group of chromatin proteins, i.e., histones H1, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 and protamine. This binding resisted strong acids, chaotropes, detergents, and high salt concentrations but was readily reversible by DNA. When the interactions of variously sized linear and branched polymer molecules with individual histone species were tested, the hierarchies of binding were branched polymers greater than long, linear polymers greater than short, linear polymers and H1 greater than H2A greater than H2B = H3 greater than H4. For histone H1, the target of polymer binding was the carboxy-terminal domain, which is also the domain most effective in inducing higher order structure of chromatin. Thus, noncovalent interactions may be involved in the modification of histone functions in chromatin.     

Monoazido analog of ethidium as a chromatin probe: Binding to DNA

Two photoaffinity analogs of ethidium, 8-azido-3-amino, and 3-azido-8-amino-5-ethyl-6-phenylphenanthridinium chloride, have been used to probe the structure of mammalian chromatin and its interactions with the ethidium moiety. The monoazido analogs were established as suitable probes by comparing their interactions with chromatin and pure DNA prepared from chromatin to those of the parent ethidium bromide. Scatchard analysis of the binding data determined from spectrophotometric titrations showed that the analogs interacted with both nucleic acids in a manner similar to the parent compound. The effect of chromatin proteins on the interaction of the ethidium moiety with intact chromatin was investigated directly. By exposing the noncovalent complex to visible light, the monoazido analog was attached covalently in its interaction sites within chromatin, and the amount of drug bound covalently to DNA was determined for both protein-free DNA and chromatin. Using saturating concentrations of drug, DNA within intact chromatin was found to be associated with only half as much drug as DNA extracted from its protein prior to drug exposure. The distribution of drug bound within chromatin was determined following the attachment of the monoazido analog (by photoactivation) to chromatin that had undergone limited nuclease digestion. Several distinct populations isolated by size fractionation and quantitative measurements revealed that (1) both the core particles and the spacer-containing particles contained bound drug, reflecting high-affinity binding sites; and (2) chromatin particles containing 150 DNA base pairs (putatively nucleosome core structures) contained less total bound drug at high drug concentrations than those particles having intact spacer DNA.