CXCR4 and CXCR7 have distinct functions in regulating interneuron migration

CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling is critical for cortical interneuron migration and their final laminar distribution. No information is yet available on CXCR7, a newly defined CXCL12 receptor. Here we demonstrated that CXCR7 regulated interneuron migration autonomously, as well as nonautonomously through its expression in immature projection neurons. Migrating cortical interneurons coexpressed Cxcr4 and Cxcr7, and Cxcr7(-/-) and Cxcr4(-/-) mutants had similar defects in interneuron positioning. Ectopic CXCL12 expression and pharmacological blockade of CXCR4 in Cxcr7(-/-) mutants showed that both receptors were essential for responding to CXCL12 during interneuron migration. Furthermore, live imaging revealed that Cxcr4(-/-) and Cxcr7(-/-) mutants had opposite defects in interneuron motility and leading process morphology. In?vivo inhibition of Gα(i/o) signaling in migrating interneurons phenocopied the interneuron lamination defects of Cxcr4(-/-) mutants. On the other hand, CXCL12 stimulation of CXCR7, but not CXCR4, promoted MAP kinase signaling. Thus, we suggest that CXCR4 and CXCR7 have distinct roles and signal transduction in regulating interneuron movement and laminar positioning.     

膀胱癌组织中CXCR4 和CXCR7 的表达及临床意义

目的:探讨膀胱癌组织中趋化因子受体4(CXCR4)和趋化因子受体7(CXCR7)的表达及临床意义。方法:收集2012年1月至2014年1月我院收集的膀胱癌组织标本96例,肿瘤旁正常组织标本42例,采用免疫组化方法检测组织标本中CXCR4和CXCR7的表达情况。结果:96例癌组织中检出CXCR4阳性59例,阳性率为61.46%,检出CXCR7阳性表达71例,阳性率为73.96%;42例癌旁组织中检出CXCR4阳性11例,阳性率26.19%,检出CXCR7阳性8例,阳性率为19.05%,癌组织与癌旁组织中CXCR4和CXCR7的表达具有统计学差异(均P0.05);相关性分析显示在膀胱癌组织中,CXCR4和CXCR7的表达呈正相关性(r=0.497,P=0.001);CXCR4和CXCR7在浸润性高(T2-T3)的膀胱癌和分化程度低(G2-G3)的膀胱癌表达强度较高,且差异具有统计学意义(均P0.05)。结论:CXCR4和CXCR7协同参与了膀胱癌的发生发展,并且与肿瘤的分化程度和浸润程度密切相关,有望成为诊断和治疗的重要靶点,在临床应用上具有重要意义。     

CXCR1和CXCR2在系统性红斑狼疮中的表达及意义

目的:检测白介素-8受体CXCR1和CXCR2在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者外周血CD14+单核细胞上的表达,探讨其与SLE疾病活动的相关性和可能涉及的SLE炎症发病机制.方法:36例活动期SLE患者和34例健康志愿者,采用流式细胞术(FCM)检测CXCR1、CXCR2在SLE患者和健康志愿者外周血CD14+单核细胞上的MFI表达.结果:CXCR2在SLE组外周血CD14+单核细胞上MFI表达(195.75±52.76)与对照组(298.82±51.86)相比明显降低(P＜0.01);CXCR2在SLE患者外周血CD14+单核细胞上MFI表达下降与C3存在着正相关关系(rs=0.421,P=0.022),与dsDNA、SLEDAI存在着负相关关系(分别为rs=-0.390,P=0.032;rs=-0.463,P=0.011).结论:SLE患者外周血CD14+单核细胞CXCR2的表达异常,提示CXCR2可能参与了SLE的发病过程.检测SLE患者外周血CD14+单核细胞的CXCR2表达水平,可能是评价SLE疾病活动性有价值的潜在的生物学标志之一.     

Combined CXCR1/CXCR2 antagonism decreases radiation-induced alveolitis in the mouse

The mechanisms leading to the radiation-induced lung responses of alveolitis and fibrosis are largely unknown. Herein we investigated whether CXC receptor 1 and 2 antagonism with CXCL8((3-72))K11R/G31P (G31P), a protein that reduces neutrophil chemotaxis in acute inflammatory response models, decreases the lung response to radiation. Mice of the AKR/J (alveolitis/pneumonitis responding) and KK/HIJ (fibrosis) strains received 18 Gy whole-thorax irradiation and a subset of these mice were treated with G31P (500 μg/kg) three times per week from the day of irradiation until euthanasia due to respiratory distress symptoms or 20 weeks after radiation treatment. Irradiated mice of both strains receiving G31P survived longer than mice receiving radiation alone. Radiation- and G31P-treated AKR/J mice surviving to the end of the experiment developed significantly less alveolitis, as measured histologically, than mice receiving radiation alone, but this difference was not evident in KK/HIJ mice. Using immunohistochemistry, G31P treatment was shown to increase the numbers of Gr-1-positive cells (neutrophils) in the lungs of unirradiated mice relative to control mice injected with saline, but the antagonist did not alter the numbers of Gr-1-positive cells in the lungs of radiation-treated mice. We conclude that G31P treatment reduces radiation-induced alveolitis but not fibrosis in mice.     

CXCR4 and CXCR7 transduce through mTOR in human renal cancer cells

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved significantly with the advent of agents targeting the mTOR pathway, such as temsirolimus and everolimus. However, their efficacy is thought to be limited by feedback loops and crosstalk with other pathways leading to the development of drug resistance. As CXCR4–CXCL12–CXCR7 axis has been described to have a crucial role in renal cancer; the crosstalk between the mTOR pathway and the CXCR4–CXCL12–CXCR7 chemokine receptor axis has been investigated in human renal cancer cells. In SN12C and A498, the common CXCR4–CXCR7 ligand, CXCL12, and the exclusive CXCR7 ligand, CXCL11, activated mTOR through P70S6K and 4EBP1 targets. The mTOR activation was specifically inhibited by CXCR4 antagonists (AMD3100, anti-CXCR4-12G5 and Peptide R, a newly developed CXCR4 antagonist) and CXCR7 antagonists (anti-CXCR7-12G8 and CCX771, CXCR7 inhibitor). To investigate the functional role of CXCR4, CXCR7 and mTOR in human renal cancer cells, both migration and wound healing were evaluated. SN12C and A498 cells migrated toward CXCL12 and CXCL11; CXCR4 and CXCR7 inhibitors impaired migration and treatment with mTOR inhibitor, RAD001, further inhibited it. Moreover, CXCL12 and CXCL11 induced wound healing while was impaired by AMD3100, the anti CXCR7 and RAD001. In SN12C and A498 cells, CXCL12 and CXCL11 promoted actin reorganization characterized by thin spikes at the cell periphery, whereas AMD3100 and anti-CXCR7 impaired CXCL12/CXCL11-induced actin polymerization, and RAD001 treatment further reduced it. In addition, when cell growth was evaluated in the presence of CXCL12, CXCL11 and mTOR inhibitors, an additive effect was demonstrated with the CXCR4, CXCR7 antagonists and RAD001. RAD001-resistant SN12C and A498 cells recovered RAD001 sensitivity in the presence of CXCR4 and CXCR7 antagonists. In conclusion, the entire axis CXCR4–CXCL12–CXCR7 regulates mTOR signaling in renal cancer cells offering new therapeutic opportunities and targets to overcome resistance to mTOR inhibitors.Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most lethal malignancy among urological cancers with a total of 64 770 new cases and 13 570 deaths estimated in the United States in 2012.¹ A growing understanding of the molecular biology of RCC changed the therapeutic approach toward target-based agents. Since 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved six new target agents for metastatic RCC that antagonize two principal signaling pathways: the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR).² The mTOR is an atypical intracellular serine/threonine protein kinase regulated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K).³ mTOR exists in two distinct complexes termed mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) comprising mTOR, mLST8 (also termed G-protein β-subunit-like protein, GβL, a yeast homolog of LST8), raptor (regulatory associated protein of mTOR) and PRAS40 (proline-rich Akt substrate, 40 kDa), and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) comprising mTOR, mLST8, rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), mSin1 (mammalian stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK)-interacting protein 1), protor (protein observed with rictor) and PRR5 (proline-rich protein 5).⁴ mTORC1 responds to amino acids, stress, oxygen, energy and growth factors and is sensitive to rapamycin; when active, mTORC1 promotes cell growth and also drives cell-cycle progression. Alternatively, mTORC2 regulates cytoskeletal organization and cell survival/metabolism and is sensitive to rapamycin over longer incubation times or at higher doses.³ mTORC1 controls cell growth and translation through the phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) and of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4EBP1, which regulate either the translation of ribosomal proteins or the cap-dependent translation by inhibition of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E, respectively.^{3, 4} The activated mTOR pathway has been identified in several human malignancies, thus being an attractive target for anticancer therapy. mTORC1 activity is inhibited by rapalogs such as rapamycin (sirolimus) and associated analogs (temsirolimus/CCI-779, RAD001, ridaforolimus/AP23573).⁵ These drugs suppress mTORC1 activity forming a complex with FK506-binding protein 12. Temsirolimus (rapamycin analog) was the first mTOR inhibitor approved as first-line treatment in patients with poor-prognosis metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients,³ ridaforolimus is currently tested in phase III clinical trials⁵ and RAD001 is indicated as second-line treatment in patients with RCC at failure of first-line treatment with sunitinib or sorafenib. Other indications are subependymal giant cell astrocytoma associated with tuberous sclerosis and progressive neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin.⁵ Although mTOR inhibitors prolong progression-free survival in patients with advanced RCC, most patients develop resistance to mTOR-inhibiting agents, limiting their efficacy; the new frontier of inhibiting the mTOR pathway is to identify agents targeting the feedback loops and crosstalks with other pathways involved in the acquired resistance to mTOR inhibitors.⁶Chemokines and their receptors have been implicated in regulating RCC growth, angiogenesis and metastases.⁷ In RCC, VHL mutation resulted in HIF-dependent CXCR4 activation⁸ and CXCR4 expression predicted poor tumor-specific survival.^{8, 9, 10} Recently, CXCL12 was shown to bind with high affinity the orphan receptor CXCR7/RDC1, which also binds a second ligand in the form of interferon-inducible T-cell α chemoattractant (I-TAC/CXCL11).¹¹ Whereas the CXCR4 activity is primarily G-protein-mediated, CXCR7 is considered an atypical GPCR because ligand binding does not result in intracellular Ca2+ release.¹¹ Some studies provided evidence that CXCR7 represents a ‘decoy'' receptor, which is responsible for either sequestering extracellular CXCL12¹² or modulating CXCR4 signaling by forming CXCR7–CXCR4 heterodimers.¹³ In contrast, others demonstrated that CXCR7 relays intracellular signals^{14, 15, 16, 17} and promotes cell motility^{18, 13, 19} acting through β-arrestin.^{20, 21} CXCR7 is highly expressed in human cancers such as prostate, lung, glioma, ovarian, breast cancer cells and in tumor-associated blood vessels and seems to be essential for survival, adhesion and growth of tumor cells.^{11, 14, 15, 22, 23, 24} It was recently demonstrated that CXCR4 and CXCR7 predict prognosis in RCC.^{10, 25} CXCL12 activates CXCR4 and the derived signaling can transduce on the mTOR pathway in pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer and T-cell leukemia cells;^{26, 27, 28, 29} antagonists targeting PI3K and/or mTOR inhibited CXCL12-mediated cell migration and this effect was primarily attributed to the inhibition of mTORC1 and consequent decrease in RhoA, Cdc42 and Rac1 in human gastric carcinoma cells.²⁸Aim of the study was to evaluate interactions between the CXCL12–CXCR4–CXCR7 axis and the mTOR pathway in human renal cancer cells to identify new therapeutic opportunities and overcome resistance mechanisms.     

Computer‐aided assessment of the chemokine receptors CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 expression in gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a vicious and invasive disease. The major challenge in the clinical treatment of GBC is the lack of a suitable prognosis method. Chemokine receptors such as CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 play vital roles in the process of tumour progression and metastasis. Their expression levels and distribution are proven to be indicative of the progression of GBC, but are hard to be decoded by conventional pathological methods, and therefore, not commonly used in the prognosis of GBC. In this study, we developed a computer‐aided image analysis method, which we used to quantitatively measure the expression levels of CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 in the nuclei and cytoplasm of glandular and interstitial cells from a cohort of 55 GBC patients. We found that CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 expressions are associated with the clinicopathological variables of GBC. Cytoplasmic CXCR3, nuclear CXCR7 and cytoplasmic CXCR7 were significant predictive factors of histology invasion, whereas cytoplasmic CXCR4 and nuclear CXCR4 were significantly correlated with T and N stage and were associated with the overall survival and disease‐free survival. These results suggest that the quantification and localisation of CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 expressions in different cell types should be considered using computer‐aided assessment to improve the accuracy of prognosis in GBC.     

CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7轴在子宫内膜异位症中的研究进展

子宫内膜异位症(endometriosis, EMT)是常见的妇科疾病,发病率高,且有年轻化的趋势。因其治疗困难且复发率高,严重影响了女性的生活质量和生育能力。研究发现趋化因子CXCL12与其受体CXCR4和CXCR7在恶性肿瘤中起重要作用。虽然EMT为良性疾病,但有恶性肿瘤的生物学特征,近来发现CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7轴可以影响子宫内膜异位症的定植、侵袭和转移。本文就当前国内外研究CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7轴在EMT发生发展过程中的作用进行了综述,旨在为EMT的治疗找到新靶点。     

CXCR4在骨肉瘤组织中的表达

研究趋化因子受体4(Chemokine receptor 4,CXCR4)的表达水平与骨肉瘤肺转移的关系并探讨CXCR4在骨肉瘤组织中表达的意义.采用免疫组织化学方法测定5例肺转移和11例无肺转移患者的骨肉瘤组织中CXCR4的表达水平.发现16例骨肉瘤组织中均有CXCR4蛋白的表达,但其表达水平存在差异,与肺转移的骨肉瘤组织(80.52±9.93)相比,11例非肺转移的骨肉瘤组织中CXCR4的表达水平(65.56±12.75)显著较低(P=0.037＜0.05).实验结果表明CXCR4的上调表达见于肺转移率较高的骨肉瘤组织,提示CXCR4可能参与了骨肉瘤的肺转移.     

Chemokine receptor trio: CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 crosstalk via CXCL11 and CXCL12

Although chemokines are well established to function in immunity and endothelial cell activation and proliferation, a rapidly growing literature suggests that CXC Chemokine receptors CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 are critical in the development and progression of solid tumors. The effect of these chemokine receptors in tumorigenesis is mediated via interactions with shared ligands I-TAC (CXCL11) and SDF-1 (CXCL12). Over the last decade, CXCR4 has been extensively reported to be overexpressed in most human solid tumors and has earned considerable attention toward elucidating its role in cancer metastasis. To enrich the existing armamentarium of anti-cancerous agents, many inhibitors of CXCL12–CXCR4 axis have emerged as additional or alternative agents for neo-adjuvant treatments and even many of them are in preclinical and clinical stages of their development. However, the discovery of CXCR7 as another receptor for CXCL12 with rather high binding affinity and recent reports about its involvement in cancer progression, has questioned the potential of “selective blockade” of CXCR4 as cancer chemotherapeutics. Interestingly, CXCR7 can also bind another chemokine CXCL11, which is an established ligand for CXCR3. Recent reports have documented that CXCR3 and their ligands are overexpressed in different solid tumors and regulate tumor growth and metastasis. Therefore, it is important to consider the interactions and crosstalk between these three chemokine receptors and their ligand mediated signaling cascades for the development of effective anti-cancer therapies. Emerging evidence also indicates that these receptors are differentially expressed in tumor endothelial cells as well as in cancer stem cells, suggesting their direct role in regulating tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. In this review, we will focus on the signals mediated by this receptor trio via their shared ligands and their role in tumor growth and progression.     

Roles of mechanical force and CXCR1/CXCR2 in shear-stress-induced endothelial cell migration

We previously demonstrated that CXCR1 and CXCR2 are novel mechanosensors mediating laminar shear-stress-induced endothelial cell (EC) migration (Zeng et al. in Cytokine 53:42–51, 2011). In the present study, an analytical model was proposed to further analyze the underlying mechanisms, assuming the mechanical force (MF) and mechanosensor-mediated biochemical reactions induce cell migration together. Shear stress can regulate both mechanosensor-mediated migration in the flow direction (Ms–M_FD) and mechanosensor-mediated migration toward a wound (Ms–M_W). Next, the migration distance, the roles of MF-induced cell migration (MF–M), and the mobilization mechanisms of mechanosensors were analyzed. The results demonstrated that MF–M plays an important role in 15.27 dyn/cm² shear-stress-induced EC migration but is far weaker than Ms–M_W at 5.56 dyn/cm². Our findings also indicated that CXCR2 played a primary role, in synergy with CXCR1. The Ms–M_FD was primarily mediated by the synergistic effect of CXCR1 and CXCR2. In Ms–M_W, when shear stress was beyond a certain threshold, the synergistic effect of CXCR1 and CXCR2 was enhanced, and the effect of CXCR1 was inhibited. Therefore, the retarding of EC migration and wound closure capacity under low shear flow was related to the low magnitude of shear stress, which may contribute to atherogenesis and many other vascular diseases.     

The role of CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand biological axis in renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 3% of new cancer incidence and mortality in the United States. Studies in RCC have predominantly focused on VEGF in promoting tumor-associated angiogenesis. However, other angiogenic factors may contribute to the overall angiogenic milieu of RCC. We hypothesized that the CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand biological axis represents a mechanism by which RCC cells promote angiogenesis and facilitate tumor growth and metastasis. Therefore, we first examined tumor biopsies and plasma of patients with metastatic RCC for levels of CXCR2 ligands, and RCC tumor biopsies for the expression of CXCR2. The proangiogenic CXCR2 ligands CXCL1, CXCL3, CXCL5, and CXCL8, as well as VEGF were elevated in the plasma of these patients and found to be expressed within the tumors. CXCR2 was found to be expressed on endothelial cells within the tumors. To assess the role of ELR(+) CXC chemokines in RCC, we next used a model of syngeneic RCC (i.e., RENCA) in BALB/c mice. CXCR2 ligand and VEGF expression temporally increased in direct correlation with RENCA growth in CXCR2(+/+) mice. However, there was a marked reduction of RENCA tumor growth in CXCR2(-/-) mice, which correlated with decreased angiogenesis and increased tumor necrosis. Furthermore, in the absence of CXCR2, orthotopic RENCA tumors demonstrated a reduced potential to metastasize to the lungs of CXCR2(-/-) mice. These data support the notion that CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand biology is an important component of RCC tumor-associated angiogenesis and tumorigenesis.     

CXCR3 in T cell function

CXCR3 is a chemokine receptor that is highly expressed on effector T cells and plays an important role in T cell trafficking and function. CXCR3 is rapidly induced on naïve cells following activation and preferentially remains highly expressed on Th1-type CD4⁺ T cells and effector CD8⁺ T cells. CXCR3 is activated by three interferon-inducible ligands CXCL9 (MIG), CXCL10 (IP-10) and CXCL11 (I-TAC). Early studies demonstrated a role for CXCR3 in the trafficking of Th1 and CD8 T cells to peripheral sites of Th1-type inflammation and the establishment of a Th1 amplification loop mediated by IFNγ and the IFNγ-inducible CXCR3 ligands. More recent studies have also suggested that CXCR3 plays a role in the migration of T cells in the microenvironment of the peripheral tissue and lymphoid compartment, facilitating the interaction of T cells with antigen presenting cells leading to the generation of effector and memory cells.     

CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand biology during lung transplant ischemia-reperfusion injury

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for a number of end-stage pulmonary disorders. Early lung allograft dysfunction (ischemia-reperfusion injury) continues to be the most common cause of early mortality after lung transplantation and a significant risk factor for the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is characterized histopathologically by lung edema and a neutrophil predominate leukocyte extravasation. The specific mechanism(s) that recruit leukocytes to the lung during post-lung transplantation ischemia-reperfusion injury have not been fully elucidated. Because the ELR+ CXC chemokines are potent neutrophil chemoattractants, we investigated their role during post-lung transplantation ischemic-reperfusion injury. We found elevated levels of multiple ELR+ CXC chemokines in human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with ischemia-reperfusion injury. Proof of concept studies using a rat orthotopic lung transplantation model of "cold" ischemic-reperfusion injury demonstrated an increase in lung graft neutrophil sequestration and injury. In addition, lung expression of CXCL1, CXCL2/3, and their shared receptor CXCR2 paralleled lung neutrophil infiltration and injury. Importantly, inhibition of CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand interactions in vivo led to a marked reduction in lung neutrophil sequestration and graft injury. Taken together these experiments support the notion that increased expression of ELR+ CXC chemokines and their interaction with CXCR2 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of post-lung transplantation cold ischemia-reperfusion injury.     

Ligand-independent CXCR2 dimerization

Homo- and hetero-oligomerization have been reported for several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The CXCR2 is a GPCR that is activated, among the others, by the chemokines CXCL8 (interleukin-8) and CXCL2 (growth-related gene product beta) to induce cell chemotaxis. We have investigated the oligomerization of CXCR2 receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney cells and generated a series of truncated mutants to determine whether they could negatively regulate the wild-type (wt) receptor functions. CXCR2 receptor oligomerization was also studied by coimmunoprecipitation of green fluorescent protein- and V5-tagged CXCR2. Truncated CXCR2 receptors retained their ability to form oligomers only if the region between the amino acids Ala-106 and Lys-163 was present. In contrast, all of the deletion mutants analyzed were able to form heterodimers with the wt CXCR2 receptor, albeit with different efficiency, competing for wt/wt dimer formation. The truncated CXCR2 mutants were not functional and, when coexpressed with wt CXCR2, interfered with receptor functions, impairing cell signaling and chemotaxis. When CXCR2 was expressed with the AMPA-type glutamate receptor GluR1, CXCR2 dimerization was again impaired in a dose-dependent way, and receptor functions were prejudiced. In contrast, CXCR1, a chemokine receptor that shares many similarities with CXCR2, did not dimerize alone or with CXCR2 and when coexpressed with CXCR2 did not impair receptor signaling and chemotaxis. The formation of CXCR2 dimers was also confirmed in cerebellar neuron cells. Taken together, we conclude from these studies that CXCR2 functions as a dimer and that truncated receptors negatively modulate receptor activities competing for the formation of wt/wt dimers.     

中性粒细胞CXCR1、CXCR2活化及其信号传导

中性粒细胞属非特异性免疫细胞,其表面可表达CXCR1和CXCR2.IL-8是其共同配体,它们彼此结合激活后续级联信号传导,产生一系列生物学效应,在介导炎症反应、促进血管新生、维持中性粒细胞稳态等起重要作用.Reparixin是非竞争变构的CXCR1和CXCR2阻滞剂,可抑制中性粒细胞过度趋化、迁移介导的炎症反应.     

Modest human immunodeficiency virus coreceptor function of CXCR3 is strongly enhanced by mimicking the CXCR4 ligand binding pocket in the CXCR3 receptor

The chemokine receptor CXCR3 can exhibit weak coreceptor function for several human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 strains and clinical isolates. These viruses produced microscopically visible cytopathicity in U87.CD4.CXCR3 cell cultures, whereas untransfected (CXCR3-negative) U87.CD4 cells remained uninfected. Depending on the particular virus, the coreceptor efficiency of CXCR3 was 100- to >10,000-fold lower compared to that of CXCR4. A CXCR3 variant carrying the CXCR4 binding pocket was constructed by simultaneous lysine-to-alanine and serine-to-glutamate substitutions at positions 300 and 304 of the CXCR3 receptor. This mutant receptor (CXCR3[K300A, S304E]) showed markedly enhanced HIV coreceptor function compared to the wild-type receptor (CXCR3[WT]). Moreover, the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 exhibited antagonistic and anti-HIV activities in U87.CD4.CXCR3[K300A, S304E] cells but not in U87.CD4.CXCR3[WT] cells.     

CXCR7/CXCR4 heterodimer constitutively recruits beta-arrestin to enhance cell migration

G protein-coupled receptor hetero-oligomerization is emerging as an important regulator of ligand-dependent transmembrane signaling, but precisely how receptor heteromers affect receptor pharmacology remains largely unknown. In this study, we have attempted to identify the functional significance of the heteromeric complex between CXCR4 and CXCR7 chemokine receptors. We demonstrate that co-expression of CXCR7 with CXCR4 results in constitutive recruitment of β-arrestin to the CXCR4·CXCR7 complex and simultaneous impairment of G(i)-mediated signaling. CXCR7/CXCR4 co-expression also results in potentiation of CXCL12 (SDF-1)-mediated downstream β-arrestin-dependent cell signaling pathways, including ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, and SAPK as judged from the results of experiments using siRNA knockdown to deplete β-arrestin. Interestingly, CXCR7/CXCR4 co-expression enhances cell migration in response to CXCL12 stimulation. Again, inhibition of β-arrestin using either siRNA knockdown or a dominant negative mutant abrogates the enhanced CXCL12-dependent migration of CXCR4/CXCR7-expressing cells. These results show how CXCR7, which cannot signal directly through G protein-linked pathways, can nevertheless affect cellular signaling networks by forming a heteromeric complex with CXCR4. The CXCR4·CXCR7 heterodimer complex recruits β-arrestin, resulting in preferential activation of β-arrestin-linked signaling pathways over canonical G protein pathways. CXCL12-dependent signaling of CXCR4 and its role in cellular physiology, including cancer metastasis, should be evaluated in the context of potential functional hetero-oligomerization with CXCR7.     

ROS-mediated regulation of CXCR4 in cancer

Oxidative stress and the accumulation of reactive oxygen specie (ROS) play a role in cancer cells developing an advanced, phenotypic signature that associates with metastasis and progression. Increased ROS concentrations are involved in promoting cancer development and metastasis by inducing expression of oncogenes, suppressing activity of anti-survival molecules and by activating various cell survival and proliferation signaling pathways. Oxidative stress is higher in the epithelium of cancer patients than patients without the disease, and antioxidant trials are currently being explored as a therapeutic option. However, studies have shown that ROS increases expression of CXCR4 in cancer and immune cells. CXCR4 expression in tumors strongly correlates to metastasis and poor prognosis. Herein, we discuss an emerging relationship between ROS and CXCR4 in cancer cells.     

Expression and Functional Heterogeneity of Chemokine Receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7 in Primary Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Cells

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. The poor prognosis and minimally successful treatments of these tumors indicates a need to identify new therapeutic targets. Therapy resistance of GBMs is attributed to heterogeneity of the glioblastoma due to genetic alterations and functional subpopulations. Chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7 play important roles in progression of various cancers although the specific functions of the CXCL12−CXCR4−CXCR7 axis in GBM are less characterized. In this study we examined the expression and function of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in four primary patient-derived GBM cell lines of the proliferative subclass, investigating their roles in in vitro growth, migration, sphere and tube formation. CXCR4 and CXCR7 cell surface expression was heterogeneous both between and within each cell line examined, which was not reflected by RT-PCR analysis. Variable percentages of CXCR4+CXCR7− (CXCR4 single positive), CXCR4−CXCR7+ (CXCR7 single positive), CXCR4+CXCR7+ (double positive), and CXCR4−CXCR7− (double negative) subpopulations were evident across the lines examined. A subpopulation of slow cell cycling cells was enriched in CXCR4 and CXCR7. CXCR4+, CXCR7+, and CXCR4+/CXCR7+ subpopulations were able to initiate intracranial tumors in vivo. CXCL12 stimulated in vitro cell growth, migration, sphere formation and tube formation in some lines and, depending on the response, the effects were mediated by either CXCR4 or CXCR7. Collectively, our results indicate a high level of heterogeneity in both the surface expression and functions of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in primary human GBM cells of the proliferative subclass. Should targeting of CXCR4 and CXCR7 provide clinical benefits to GBM patients, a personalized treatment approach should be considered given the differential expression and functions of these receptors in GBM.