The potential for the formation of the arginine biosynthetic enzymes and its masking during evolution

The present account spans the history of arginine regulation from its discovery in 1955 until the present. In 1957 I demonstrated that not only added arginine but also internally produced arginine represses enzyme formation and that the potential for enzyme synthesis is in excess of what is required for growth. In 1959 I located the regulatory gene argR encoding the arginine repressor. An unusual feature of this research was the finding that in E. coli B, in contrast to E. coli K12, arginine synthesis is permanently repressed, independent of arginine. This was due to a single amino acid difference between the two repressors. Recent studies showed that, in natural populations of E. coli, K12-type regulation is much more frequent than B-type regulation, and that E. coli B evolved from a strain with K12-type regulation. In competition experiments, E. coli K12 was found to be favored in the presence of arginine and E. coli B in its absence, showing that contrary to expectations permanently turned off regulation is favored over negative regulation in some environments.     

Functional dissection of a Rice Dr1/DrAp1 transcriptional repression complex

We characterized rice cDNA sequences for OsDr1 and OsDrAp1, which encode structural homologs of the eukaryotic general repressors Dr1 and DrAp1, respectively. OsDr1 and OsDrAp1 are nuclear proteins that interact with each other and with the TATA binding protein/DNA complex. In vitro and in vivo functional analyses showed that OsDrAp1 functions as a repressor, unlike its role in other eukaryotic systems, in which DrAp1 is a corepressor. OsDr1 and OsDrAp1 functioned together as a much stronger repressor than either one alone. Functional dissections revealed that the N-terminal histone-fold domains of OsDr1 and OsDrAp1 were necessary and sufficient for their repression and protein-protein interaction with each other. The unique glutamine- and proline-rich domain of OsDr1 had no repression activity. The basic amino acid-rich region and an arginine and glycine repeat domain of OsDrAp1 enhanced its repression activity. Thus, although OsDr1 and OsDrAp1 function as repressors, the functions of the two components are reversed compared with those of their nonplant counterparts.     

Binding of the arginine repressor of Escherichia coli K12 to its operator sites.

In the arginine regulon of Escherichia coli K12 each of the eight operator sites consists of two 18-base-pair-long palindromic sequences called ARG boxes. In the operator sites for the structural genes of the regulon the two ARG boxes are separated by three base-pairs, in the regulatory gene argR they are separated by two base-pairs. The hexameric arginine repressor, the product of argR, binds to the two ARG boxes in an operator in the presence of L-arginine. From the results of various kinds of in vitro footprinting experiments with the ARG boxes of argF and argR (DNase I protection, hydroxyl radical, ethylation and methylation interference, methylation protection) it can be concluded that: (1) the repressor binds simultaneously to two adjacent ARG boxes; (2) that it binds on one face of the double helix; and (3) that it forms contacts with the major and minor grooves of each ARG box, but not with the central three base-pairs. The repressor can bind also to a single ARG box, but its affinity is about 100-fold lower than for two ARG boxes. From gel retardation experiments with 3H-labeled repressor and 32P-labeled argF operator DNA, it is concluded that the retarded DNA-protein complex contains no more than one repressor molecule per operator site and that most likely one hexamer binds to two ARG boxes. The bound repressor was shown to induce bending of argF operator DNA. The bending angle calculated from the results of gel retardation experiments is about 70 degrees and the bending center was located within the region encompassing the ARG boxes. The main features that distinguish the arginine repressor from other repressors studied in E. coli are its hexameric nature and the simultaneous binding of one hexameric molecule to two palindromic ARG boxes that are close to each other.     

Sequences required for regulation of arginine biosynthesis promoters are conserved between Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli

The region required for regulation of a previously characterized arginine-regulatable promoter upstream from the argC gene in the argCAEBD-cpa-argF cluster of Bacillus subtilis was defined by integration of argC-lacZ translational fusions into the chromosome at a site distant from the arginine loci. Some sequence similarity was detected between the argC regulatory region and the well-characterized Escherichia coli arginine operators (ARG boxes). This similarity was shown to be functional in vivo in that the B. subtilis repressor regulated the E. coli arginine genes, but the E. coli repressor, even when encoded by a multicopy plasmid, could not repress the B. subtilis argC promoter. In vitro binding studies using purified repressors on DNA fragments encoding operators from both E. coli and B. subtilis demonstrated interactions by both proteins.     

Two arginine repressors regulate arginine biosynthesis in Lactobacillus plantarum

The repression of the carAB operon encoding carbamoyl phosphate synthase leads to Lactobacillus plantarum FB331 growth inhibition in the presence of arginine. This phenotype was used in a positive screening to select spontaneous mutants deregulated in the arginine biosynthesis pathway. Fourteen mutants were genetically characterized for constitutive arginine production. Mutations were located either in one of the arginine repressor genes (argR1 or argR2) present in L. plantarum or in a putative ARG operator in the intergenic region of the bipolar carAB-argCJBDF operons involved in arginine biosynthesis. Although the presence of two ArgR regulators is commonly found in gram-positive bacteria, only single arginine repressors have so far been well studied in Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis. In L. plantarum, arginine repression was abolished when ArgR1 or ArgR2 was mutated in the DNA binding domain, or in the oligomerization domain or when an A123D mutation occurred in ArgR1. A123, equivalent to the conserved residue A124 in E. coli ArgR involved in arginine binding, was different in the wild-type ArgR2. Thus, corepressor binding sites may be different in ArgR1 and ArgR2, which have only 35% identical residues. Other mutants harbored wild-type argR genes, and 20 mutants have lost their ability to grow in normal air without carbon dioxide enrichment; this revealed a link between arginine biosynthesis and a still-unknown CO2-dependent metabolic pathway. In many gram-positive bacteria, the expression and interaction of different ArgR-like proteins may imply a complex regulatory network in response to environmental stimuli.     

Regulation of arginine biosynthesis in the psychropiezophilic bacterium Moritella profunda: in vivo repressibility and in vitro repressor-operator contact probing

We report the cloning of the arginine repressor gene from the psychropiezophilic Gram-negative bacterium Moritella profunda, the purification of its product (ArgR(Mp)), the identification of the operator in the bipolar argECBFGH(A) operon, in vivo repressibility studies, and an in vitro analysis of the repressor-operator interaction, including binding to mutant and heterologous arginine operators. The ArgR(Mp) subunit shows about 70% amino acid sequence identity with Escherichia coli ArgR (ArgR(Ec)). Binding of purified hexameric ArgR(Mp) to the control region of the divergent operon proved to be arginine-dependent, sequence-specific, and significantly more sensitive to heat than complex formation with ArgR(Ec). ArgR(Mp) binds E.coli arginine operators very efficiently, but hardly recognizes the operator from Bacillus stearothermophilus or Thermotoga maritima. ArgR(Mp) binds to a single site overlapping the -35 element of argC(P), but not argE(P). Therefore, the arrangement of promoter and operator sites in the bipolar argECBFGH(A) operon of M.profunda is very different from the organization of control elements in the bipolar argECBH operon of E.coli, where both promoters overlap the common operator and are equally repressible. We demonstrate that M.profunda argC(P) is about 44-fold repressible, whereas argE(P) is fully constitutive. A high-resolution contact map of the ArgR(Mp)-operator interaction was established by enzymatic and chemical footprinting, missing contact and base-specific premodification binding interference studies. The results indicate that the argC operator consists of two ARG box-like sequences (18bp imperfect palindromes) separated by 3bp. ArgR(Mp) binds to one face of the DNA helix and establishes contacts with two major groove segments and the intervening minor groove of each ARG box, whereas the minor groove segment facing the repressor at the center of the operator remains largely uncontacted. This pattern is reminiscent of complex formation with the repressors of E.coli and B.stearothermophilus, and suggests that each ARG box is contacted by two ArgR subunits belonging to opposite trimers. Moreover, the premodification interference patterns and mutant studies clearly indicate that the inner, center proximal halves of each ARG box in the M.profunda argC operator are more important for complex formation and repression than the outermost halves. A close inspection of sequence conservation and of single base-pair O(c)-type mutations indicate that the same conclusion can be generalized to E.coli operators.     

Roles of arginine and canavanine in the synthesis and repression of ornithine transcarbamylase by Escherichia coli

Conditions were found under which the processes of repression and derepression of ornithine transcarbamylase were separated from the process of enzyme synthesis. After 10 min of arginine deprivation followed by the addition of 2 to 200 mug of l-arginine per ml, a number of strains of Escherichia coli exhibited a significant burst of ornithine transcarbamylase synthesis which lasted 3 to 4 min before the onset of repression. The rapid increase of enzyme activity was shown to require protein synthesis, and was not due to a slow uptake of arginine or induction of an arginine-inducible ornithine transcarbamylase. The capacity of E. coli to synthesize the burst of ornithine transcarbamylase reached a maximum after 10 min of arginine deprivation and then remained constant. The observed increase in enzyme synthesis may reflect the level of unstable messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA) for ornithine transcarbamylase present in the cell at the time protein synthesis was reinitiated. After the addition of arginine in the absence of protein synthesis, the burst of ornithine transcarbamylase decayed with a half-life of about 3 min. The data implied that arginine prevents synthesis of new messenger RNA that can translate this enzyme. Repression of ornithine transcarbamylase by l-canavanine (100 to 200 mug/ml) was observed, and no active enzyme was formed in the presence of this analogue. The action of canavanine as a repressor was distinguished from the inhibitory effect of this compound on protein synthesis.     

The highly thermostable arginine repressor of Bacillus stearothermophilus: gene cloning and repressor–operator interactions

We report here the cloning of the arginine repressor gene argR of Bacillus stearothermophilus and the characterization and purification to homogeneity of its product. The deduced amino acid sequence of the 16.8-kDa ArgR subunit shares 72% identity with its mesophilic homologue AhrC of Bacilus subtilis . Sequence analysis of B. stearothermophilus ArgR and comparisons with mesophilic arginine repressors suggest that the thermostable repressor comprises an N-terminal DNA-binding and a C-terminal oligomerization and arginine-binding region. B. stearothermophilus ArgR has been overexpressed in E. coli and purified as a 48.0-kDa trimeric protein. The repressor inhibits the expression of a B. stearothermophilus argC–lacZ fusion in E. coli cells. In the presence of arginine, the purified protein binds tightly and specifically to the argC operator, which largely overlaps the argC promoter. The purified B. stearothermophilus repressor proved to be very thermostable with a half-life of approximately 30 min at 90°C, whereas B. subtilis AhrC was largely inactivated at 65°C. Moreover, ArgR operator complexes were found to be remarkably thermostable and could be formed efficiently at up to 85°C, well above the optimal growth temperature of the moderate thermophile B. stearothermophilus . This pronounced resistance of the repressor–operator complexes to heat treatment suggests that the same type of regulatory mechanism could operate in extreme thermophiles.