RNA-specific ribonucleotidyl transferases

RNA-specific nucleotidyl transferases (rNTrs) are a diverse family of template-independent polymerases that add ribonucleotides to the 3'-ends of RNA molecules. All rNTrs share a related active-site architecture first described for DNA polymerase beta and a catalytic mechanism conserved among DNA and RNA polymerases. The best known examples are the nuclear poly(A) polymerases involved in the 3'-end processing of eukaryotic messenger RNA precursors and the ubiquitous CCA-adding enzymes that complete the 3'-ends of tRNA molecules. In recent years, a growing number of new enzymes have been added to the list that now includes the "noncanonical" poly(A) polymerases involved in RNA quality control or in the readenylation of dormant messenger RNAs in the cytoplasm. Other members of the group are terminal uridylyl transferases adding single or multiple UMP residues in RNA-editing reactions or upon the maturation of small RNAs and poly(U) polymerases, the substrates of which are still not known. 2'-5'Oligo(A) synthetases differ from the other rNTrs by synthesizing oligonucleotides with 2'-5'-phosphodiester bonds de novo.     

CCA-adding enzymes and poly(A) polymerases are all members of the same nucleotidyltransferase superfamily: characterization of the CCA-adding enzyme from the archaeal hyperthermophile Sulfolobus shibatae.

We describe the purification, cloning, and characterization of the CCA-adding enzyme [ATP(CTP):tRNA nucleotidyl transferase] from the thermophilic archaebacterium, Sulfolobus shibatae. Characterization of an archaeal CCA-adding enzyme provides formal proof that the CCA-adding activity is present in all three contemporary kingdoms. Antibodies raised against recombinant, expressed Sulfolobus CCA-adding enzyme reacted specifically with the 48-kDa protein and fully depleted all CCA-adding activity from S. shibatae crude extract. Thus, the cloned cca gene encodes the only CCA-adding activity in S. shibatae. Remarkably, the archaeal CCA-adding enzyme exhibits no strong homology to either the eubacterial or eukaryotic CCA-adding enzymes. Nonetheless, it does possess the active site signature G[SG][LIVMFY]xR[GQ]x5,6D[LIVM][CLIVMFY]3-5 of the nucleotidyltransferase superfamily identified by Holm and Sander (1995, Trends Biochem Sci 20:345-347) and sequence comparisons show that all known CCA-adding enzymes and poly(A) polymerases are contained within this superfamily. Moreover, we propose that the superfamily can now be divided into two (and possibly three) subfamilies: class I, which contains the archaeal CCA-adding enzyme, eukaryotic poly(A) polymerases, and DNA polymerase beta; class II, which contains eubacterial and eukaryotic CCA-adding enzymes, and eubacterial poly(A) polymerases; and possibly a third class containing eubacterial polynucleotide phosphorylases. One implication of these data is that there may have been intraconversion of CCA-adding and poly(A) polymerase activities early in evolution.     

A family of poly(U) polymerases

The GLD-2 family of poly(A) polymerases add successive AMP monomers to the 3' end of specific RNAs, forming a poly(A) tail. Here, we identify a new group of GLD-2-related nucleotidyl transferases from Arabidopsis, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Caenorhabditis elegans, and humans. Like GLD-2, these enzymes are template independent and add nucleotides to the 3' end of an RNA substrate. However, these new enzymes, which we refer to as poly(U) polymerases, add poly(U) rather than poly(A) to their RNA substrates.     

Determinants of substrate specificity in RNA-dependent nucleotidyl transferases

Poly(A) polymerases were identified almost 50 years ago as enzymes that add multiple AMP residues to the 3' ends of primer RNAs without use of a template from ATP as cosubstrate and with release of pyrophosphate. Based on sequence homology of a signature motif in the catalytic domain, poly(A) polymerases were later found to belong to a superfamily of nucleotidyl transferases acting on a very diverse array of substrates. Enzymes belonging to the superfamily can add from single nucleotides of AMP, CMP or UMP to RNA, antibiotics and proteins but also homopolymers of many hundred residues to the 3' ends of RNA molecules. The recently reported structures of several nucleotidyl transferases facilitate the study of the catalytic mechanisms of these very diverse enzymes. Numerous structures of CCA-adding enzymes have now revealed all steps in the formation of a CCA tail at the 3' end of tRNAs. In addition, structures of poly(A) polymerases and uridylyl transferases are now available as binary and ternary complexes with incoming nucleotide and RNA primer. Some of these proteins undergo significant conformational changes after substrate binding. This is proposed to be an indication for an induced fit mechanism that drives substrate selection and leads to catalysis. Insights from recent structures of ternary complexes indicate an important role for the primer molecule in selecting the incoming nucleotide.     

Poly(C) synthesis by class I and class II CCA-adding enzymes

The CCA-adding enzymes [ATP(CTP):tRNA nucleotidyl transferases], which catalyze synthesis of the conserved CCA sequence to the tRNA 3' end, are divided into two classes. Recent studies show that the class II Escherichia coli CCA-adding enzyme synthesizes poly(C) when incubated with CTP alone, but switches to synthesize CCA when incubated with both CTP and ATP. Because the poly(C) activity can shed important light on the mechanism of the untemplated synthesis of CCA, it is important to determine if this activity is also present in the class I CCA enzymes, which differ from the class II enzymes by significant sequence divergence. We show here that two members of the class I family, the archaeal Sulfolobus shibatae and Methanococcus jannaschii CCA-adding enzymes, are also capable of poly(C) synthesis. These two class I enzymes catalyze poly(C) synthesis and display a response of kinetic parameters to the presence of ATP similar to that of the class II E. coli enzyme. Thus, despite extensive sequence diversification, members of both classes employ common strategies of nucleotide addition, suggesting conservation of a mechanism in the development of specificity for CCA. For the E. coli enzyme, discrimination of poly(C) from CCA synthesis in the intact tRNA and in the acceptor-TPsiC domain is achieved by the same kinetic strategy, and a mutation that preferentially affects addition of A76 but not poly(C) has been identified. Additionally, we show that enzymes of both classes exhibit a processing activity that removes nucleotides in the 3' to 5' direction to as far as position 74.     

Metal-ion-dependent catalysis and specificity of CCA-adding enzymes: a comparison of two classes

The CCA-adding enzymes [ATP(CTP):tRNA nucleotidyl transferases] catalyze synthesis of the conserved and essential CCA sequence to the tRNA 3' end. These enzymes are divided into two classes of distinct structures that differ in the overall orientation of the head to tail domains. However, the catalytic core of the two classes is conserved and contains three carboxylates in a geometry commonly found in DNA and RNA polymerases that use the two-metal-ion mechanism for phosphoryl transfer. Two important aspects of the two-metal-ion mechanism are tested here for CCA enzymes: the dependence on metal ions for catalysis and for specificity of nucleotide addition. Using the archaeal Sulfolobus shibabae enzyme as an example of the class I, and the bacterial Escherichia coli enzyme as an example of the class II, we show that both enzymes depend on metal ions for catalysis, and that both use primarily Mg2+ and Mn2+ as the "productive" metal ions, but several other metal ions such as Ca2+ as the "nonproductive" metal ions. Of the two productive metal ions, Mg2+ specifically promotes synthesis of the correct CCA, whereas Mn2+ preferentially accelerates synthesis of the noncognate CCC and poly(C). Thus, despite evolution of structural diversity of two classes, both classes use metal ions to determine catalysis and specificity. These results provide critical insights into the catalytic mechanism of CCA synthesis to allow the two classes to be related to each other, and to members of the larger family of DNA and RNA polymerases.     

Closely related CC- and A-adding enzymes collaborate to construct and repair the 3'-terminal CCA of tRNA in Synechocystis sp. and Deinococcus radiodurans

The 3'-terminal CCA sequence of tRNA is faithfully constructed and repaired by the CCA-adding enzyme (ATP(CTP):tRNA nucleotidyltransferase) using CTP and ATP as substrates but no nucleic acid template. Until recently, all CCA-adding enzymes from all three kingdoms appeared to be composed of a single kind of polypeptide with dual specificity for adding both CTP and ATP; however, we recently found that in Aquifex aeolicus, which lies near the deepest root of the eubacterial 16 S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree, CCA addition represents a collaboration between closely related CC-adding and A-adding enzymes (Tomita, K. and Weiner, A. M. (2001) Science 294, 1334-1336). Here we show that in Synechocystis sp. and Deinococcus radiodurans, as in A. aeolicus, CCA is added by homologous CC- and A-adding enzymes. We also find that the eubacterial CCA-, CC-, and A-adding enzymes, as well as the related eubacterial poly(A) polymerases, each fall into phylogenetically distinct groups derived from a common ancestor. Intriguingly, the Thermatoga maritima CCA-adding enzyme groups with the A-adding enzymes, suggesting that these distinct tRNA nucleotidyltransferase activities can intraconvert over evolutionary time.     

Kinetic analysis of 3'-5' nucleotide addition catalyzed by eukaryotic tRNA(His) guanylyltransferase

The tRNA(His) guanylyltransferase (Thg1) catalyzes the incorporation of a single guanosine residue at the -1 position (G(-1)) of tRNA(His), using an unusual 3'-5' nucleotidyl transfer reaction. Thg1 and Thg1 orthologs known as Thg1-like proteins (TLPs), which catalyze tRNA repair and editing, are the only known enzymes that add nucleotides in the 3'-5' direction. Thg1 enzymes share no identifiable sequence similarity with any other known enzyme family that could be used to suggest the mechanism for catalysis of the unusual 3'-5' addition reaction. The high-resolution crystal structure of human Thg1 revealed remarkable structural similarity between canonical DNA/RNA polymerases and eukaryotic Thg1; nevertheless, questions regarding the molecular mechanism of 3'-5' nucleotide addition remain. Here, we use transient kinetics to measure the pseudo-first-order forward rate constants for the three steps of the G(-1) addition reaction catalyzed by yeast Thg1: adenylylation of the 5' end of the tRNA (k(aden)), nucleotidyl transfer (k(ntrans)), and removal of pyrophosphate from the G(-1)-containing tRNA (k(ppase)). This kinetic framework, in conjunction with the crystal structure of nucleotide-bound Thg1, suggests a likely role for two-metal ion chemistry in all three chemical steps of the G(-1) addition reaction. Furthermore, we have identified additional residues (K44 and N161) involved in adenylylation and three positively charged residues (R27, K96, and R133) that participate primarily in the nucleotidyl transfer step of the reaction. These data provide a foundation for understanding the mechanism of 3'-5' nucleotide addition in tRNA(His) maturation.     

Structural Studies of a Bacterial tRNAHIS Guanylyltransferase (Thg1)-Like Protein,with Nucleotide in the Activation and Nucleotidyl Transfer Sites

All nucleotide polymerases and transferases catalyze nucleotide addition in a 5′ to 3′ direction. In contrast, tRNA^His guanylyltransferase (Thg1) enzymes catalyze the unusual reverse addition (3′ to 5′) of nucleotides to polynucleotide substrates. In eukaryotes, Thg1 enzymes use the 3′–5′ addition activity to add G₋₁ to the 5′-end of tRNA^His, a modification required for efficient aminoacylation of the tRNA by the histidyl-tRNA synthetase. Thg1-like proteins (TLPs) are found in Archaea, Bacteria, and mitochondria and are biochemically distinct from their eukaryotic Thg1 counterparts TLPs catalyze 5′-end repair of truncated tRNAs and act on a broad range of tRNA substrates instead of exhibiting strict specificity for tRNA^His. Taken together, these data suggest that TLPs function in distinct biological pathways from the tRNA^His maturation pathway, perhaps in tRNA quality control. Here we present the first crystal structure of a TLP, from the gram-positive soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (BtTLP). The enzyme is a tetramer like human THG1, with which it shares substantial structural similarity. Catalysis of the 3′–5′ reaction with 5′-monophosphorylated tRNA necessitates first an activation step, generating a 5′-adenylylated intermediate prior to a second nucleotidyl transfer step, in which a nucleotide is transferred to the tRNA 5′-end. Consistent with earlier characterization of human THG1, we observed distinct binding sites for the nucleotides involved in these two steps of activation and nucleotidyl transfer. A BtTLP complex with GTP reveals new interactions with the GTP nucleotide in the activation site that were not evident from the previously solved structure. Moreover, the BtTLP-ATP structure allows direct observation of ATP in the activation site for the first time. The BtTLP structural data, combined with kinetic analysis of selected variants, provide new insight into the role of key residues in the activation step.     

Evidence for metalloenzyme character of tRNA nucleotidyl transferase.

Previous studies (1–5) have shown that several nucleotidyl transferases are metalloenzymes and in a few cases (1–3) the metal has been identified as zinc. In all instances these enzymes are specifically inhibited by incubation with the chelating agent 1,10-phenanthroline but are not affected by the structurally similar 1,7-phenanthroline which does not chelate metals. We report here that tRNA nucleotidyl transferase from E. coli is inhibited by 1,10-phenanthroline and that only the initial rate of incorporation of AMP is affected; CMP incorporation is not specifically inhibited by this chelator. This finding is in conflict with a previous study (5) in which it was claimed that tRNA nucleotidyl transferase from Rous sarcoma virus and from yeast was unaffected by 1,10-phenanthroline and suggests that the E. coli tRNA nucleotidyl transferase is a metalloenzyme.     

A phylogeny of bacterial RNA nucleotidyltransferases: Bacillus halodurans contains two tRNA nucleotidyltransferases

We have analyzed the distribution of RNA nucleotidyltransferases from the family that includes poly(A) polymerases (PAP) and tRNA nucleotidyltransferases (TNT) in 43 bacterial species. Genes of several bacterial species encode only one member of the nucleotidyltransferase superfamily (NTSF), and if that protein functions as a TNT, those organisms may not contain a poly(A) polymerase I like that of Escherichia coli. The genomes of several of the species examined encode more than one member of the nucleotidyltransferase superfamily. The function of some of those proteins is known, but in most cases no biochemical activity has been assigned to the NTSF. The NTSF protein sequences were used to construct an unrooted phylogenetic tree. To learn more about the function of the NTSFs in species whose genomes encode more than one, we have examined Bacillus halodurans. We have demonstrated that B. halodurans adds poly(A) tails to the 3' ends of RNAs in vivo. We have shown that the genes for both of the NTSFs encoded by the B. halodurans genome are transcribed in vivo. We have cloned, overexpressed, and purified the two NTSFs and have shown that neither functions as poly(A) polymerase in vitro. Rather, the two proteins function as tRNA nucleotidyltransferases, and our data suggest that, like some of the deep branching bacterial species previously studied by others, B. halodurans possesses separate CC- and A-adding tRNA nucleotidyltransferases. These observations raise the interesting question of the identity of the enzyme responsible for RNA polyadenylation in Bacillus.     

Roles for cytoplasmic polyadenylation in cell cycle regulation

Polyadenylation of eukaryotic mRNAs in the nucleus promotes their translation following export to the cytoplasm and is an important determinant of mRNA stability. An additional level of control of gene expression is provided by cytoplasmic polyadenylation, which activates translation of a number of mRNAs important in orchestrating cell cycle events in oocytes. Recent studies indicate that cytoplasmic polyadenylation may be a mechanism of translational activation that is more widespread in eukaryotic cells. Here we discuss the roles of a recently identified family of nucleotidyl transferases (encoded by the cid1 gene family) in cell cycle regulation. To date, this family has been characterised mainly in yeasts, but it is conserved throughout the eukaryotes. Biochemical studies have indicated that a subset of members of this family function as cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerases targeting specific mRNAs for translation. This form of translational control appears to be particularly important for cell cycle regulation following inhibition of DNA synthesis.     

An attempt to unify the structure of polymerases

With the great availability of sequences from RNA- and DNA-dependent RNA and DNA polymerases, it has become possible to delineate a few highly conserved regions for various polymerase types. In this work a DNA polymerase sequence from bacteriophage SPO2 was found to be homologous to the polymerase domain of the Klenow fragment of polymerase I from Escherichia coli, which is known to be closely related to those from Staphylococcus pneumoniae, Thermus aquaticus and bacteriophages T7 and T5. The alignment of the SPO2 polymerase with the other five sequences considerably narrowed the conserved motifs in these proteins. Three of the motifs matched reasonably all the conserved motifs of another DNA polymerase type, characterized by human polymerase alpha. It is also possible to find these three motifs in monomeric DNA-dependent RNA polymerases and two of them in DNA polymerase beta and DNA terminal transferases. These latter two motifs also matched two of the four motifs recently identified in 84 RNA-dependent polymerases. From the known tertiary architecture of the Klenow fragment of E. coli pol I, a spatial arrangement can be implied for these motifs. In addition, numerous biochemical experiments suggesting a role for the motifs in a common function (dNTP binding) also support these inferences. This speculative hypothesis, attempting to unify polymerase structure at least locally, if not globally, under the pol I fold, should provide a useful model to direct mutagenesis experiments to probe template and substrate specificity in polymerases.     

Highly repetitive tRNA(Pro)-tRNA(His) gene cluster from Photobacterium phosphoreum.

A DNA fragment comprising the four tRNA gene sequences of the Escherichia coli argT locus hybridized with two Sau3A-generated DNA fragments from the vibrio Photobacterium phosphoreum (ATCC 11040). Detailed sequence analysis of the longer fragment shows the following gene organization: 5'-promoter-tRNA(Pro)-tRNAPro-tRNA(Pro)-tRNA(His)-tRNA(Pro)-tRNA(Pro)- tRNA(His)-tRNA(Pro)-five pseudogenes derived from the upstream tRNAPro interspersed by putative Rho-independent terminators. This sequence demonstrates the presence of highly repetitive, tandem tRNA genes in a bacterial genome. Furthermore, a stretch of 304 nucleotides from this cluster was found virtually unchanged in the other (shorter) fragment which was previously sequenced. The two clusters together contain eight tRNA(Pro) pseudogenes and eight fully intact tRNA(Pro) genes, an unusually high number for a single eubacterial isoacceptor tRNA. These results show that the organization of some tRNA operons is highly variable in eubacteria.