The position of the Arthropoda in the phylogenetic system

Traditionally, Panarthropoda (Euarthropoda, Onychophora, Tardigrada) are regarded as being closely related to Annelida in a taxon Articulata, but this is not supported by molecular analyses. Comparisons of gene sequences suggest that all molting taxa (Panarthropoda, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera) are related in a monophyletic taxon Ecdysozoa. An examination of the characters supporting Articulata reveals that only segmentation with a teloblastic segment formation and the existence of segmental coelomic cavities with nephridia support the Articulata, whereas all other characters are modified or reduced in the panarthropod lineage. Another set of characters is presented that supports the monophyly of Ecdysozoa: molting under influence of ecdysteroid hormones, loss of locomotory cilia, trilayered cuticle and the formation of the epicuticle from the tips of epidermal microvilli. Comparative morphology suggests Gastrotricha as the sister group of Ecdysozoa with the synapomorphies: triradiate muscular sucking pharynx and terminal mouth opening. Thus there are morphological characters that support Articulata, but molecular as well as morphological data advocate Ecdysozoa. Comparison of both hypotheses should prompt further thorough and targeted investigations. J. Morphol. 238:263–285, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence

Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta-zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith-eliozoa (= -03non-Porifera), Triploblastica, Mesozoa, Eutriploblastica (=Rhabditophora+Catenulida+“higher triploblasts”=Neotriploblastica, including Xeno- turbellida and Gnathostomulida), Rhabditophora, Syndermata (=“Rotifera”+Acanthocephala), Neotrichozoa (=Gastrotricha+Gnathostomulida), Nematozoa (=Nematoda+Nematomorpha), Panarthropoda (=Onychophora+Tardigrada+ Arthropoda), Cephalorhyncha, Deuterostomia, Ambulacralia (=Hemichordata+Echinodermata), Chordata, Phoronozoa (=Phoronida+“Brachiopoda”), Bryozoa, Trochozoa (=Eutrochozoa+Entoprocta+ Cycliophora), Eutrochozoa, and Chaetifera (=Annelida+ Pogonophora+Echiura) is strongly supported. Cnidaria (including Myxozoa), Ecdysozoa (=Cepha- lorhyncha + Nematozoa + Chaetognatha + Panarthropoda), Eucoelomata (=Bryozoa+Phoronozoa+Deuterostomia+Trochozoa, possibly including also Xenoturbellida), and Deuterostomia+Phoronozoa probably are monophyletic. Most traditional “phyla” are monophyletic, except for Porifera, Cnidaria (excluding Myxozoa), Platyhelminthes, Brachiopoda, and Rotifera. Three “hot” regions of the tree remain quite unresolved: basal Epitheliozoa, basal Triploblastica, and basal Neotriploblastica. A new phylogenetic classification of the Metazoa including 35 formally recognized phyla (Silicispongea, Calcispongea, Placozoa, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Acoela, Nemertodermatida, Orthonecta, Rhombozoa, Rhabditophora, Catenulida, Syndermata, Gnathostomulida, Gastrotricha, Cephalorhyncha, Chaetognatha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Chordata, Phoronozoa, Bryozoa s. str., Xenoturbellida, Entoprocta, Cycliophora, Nemertea, Mollusca, Sipuncula, Echiura, Pogonophora, and Annelida) and few i ncertae sedis g roups (e.g. Myzostomida and Lobatocerebromorpha) is proposed.     

Tardigrades — Are They Really Miniaturized Dwarfs?

Tardigrades are animals of small body size which is often regarded to be a secondary phenomenon. This interpretation makes sense in the traditional concept that tardigrades are closely related to Onychophora, Euarthropoda and Annelida. A large body size in the ancestor of this common taxon (Articulata) is probable. Small size and the absence of organs such as a dorsal heart, segmental coelomic cavities and metanephridia must then be interpreted as derived in tardigrades. However, when Cycloneuralia are taken as an outgroup instead of Annelida (taxon Ecdysozoa), an interpretation of small body size as a primary feature is plausible. This also accounts for the absence of heart, coelom and nephridia.The choice of outgroup influences hypotheses about sister-group relationships within Panarthropoda, with either Onychophora (Articulata-concept) or Tardigrada (Ecdysozoa-concept) being basal.     

Proposing a solution to the Articulata–Ecdysozoa controversy

Recent studies of animal radiation agree on monophyly of the Bilateria, but there is no consensus about the early radiation of the group. Protostomia and Deuterostomia are usually recognized, with two competing theories regarding the division of the Protostomia: one divides them into Spiralia and Cycloneuralia, the other into Lophotrochozoa and Ecdysozoa. The main discrepancy concerns the Arthropoda, which are placed with the Articulata within the Spiralia by the first group, and with the Cycloneuralia within the Ecdysozoa by the second. Here I propose that this discrepancy can be resolved by regarding the Ecdysozoa as the sister group of the Annelida within the Articulata. This implies that segmentation has been lost in phyla such as Nematoda and Priapula, but the Kinorhyncha may show a 'reduced segmentation' with serially arranged muscles associated with a ringed cuticle. Morphological, palaeontological and molecular implications of this theory are discussed. While many morphological and palaeontological data can be interpreted in accordance with the theory, the molecular data remain inconclusive.     

The clade Ecdysozoa, perplexities and questions

A relatively new clade, the Ecdysozoa [Aguinaldo et al., 1997. Nature 387, 489-493] was raised based on the 18S ribosomal DNA sequences that indicate a close relationship between the moulting phyla (Arthropoda, Tardigrada, Onychophora, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Kinorhyncha, Lorificera and Priapula), from which the Annelida, with other phyla, are excluded.However, the authors here expressed puzzlement about this conclusion. In particular they stressed that: (a) ecdysis might not be an autapomorphy for the Ecdysozoa; (b) some Ecdysozoa phyla are unrelated from one another with regard to morphology and embryogeny; (c) the annelids have a body architecture that is more similar to arthropods than some of the Ecdysozoa; (d) the annelids are moulting animals; (e) some phyla excluded from the new clade (e.g. the gastrotrichs), probably carry out a gradual ecdysis by flaking similar to that of the polychaetes.The authors concluded that the clade Ecdysozoa appears to be phylogenetically unconvincing.     

Old trees, new trees--is there any progress?

The amount of comparative data for phylogenetic analyses is constantly increasing. Data come from different directions such as morphology, molecular genetics, developmental biology and paleontology. With the increasing diversity of data and of analytical tools, the number of competing hypotheses on phylogenetic relationships rises, too. The choice of the phylogenetic tree as a basis for the interpretation of new data is important, because different trees will support different evolutionary interpretations of the data investigated. I argue here that, although many problematic aspects exist, there are several phylogenetic relationships that are supported by the majority of analyses and may be regarded as something like a robust backbone. This accounts, for example, for the monophyly of Metazoa, Bilateria, Deuterostomia, Protostomia (= Gastroneuralia), Gnathifera, Spiralia, Trochozoa and Arthropoda and probably also for the branching order of diploblastic taxa (“Porifera”, Trichoplax adhaerens, Cnidaria and Ctenophora). Along this “backbone”, there are several problematic regions, where either monophyly is questionable and/or where taxa “rotate” in narrow regions of the tree. This is illustrated exemplified by the probable paraphyly of Porifera and the phylogenetic relationships of basal spiralian taxa. Two problems span wider regions of the tree: the position of Arthropoda either as the sister taxon of Annelida (= Articulata) or of Cycloneuralia (= Ecdysozoa) and the position of tentaculate taxa either as sister taxa of Deuterostomia (= Radialia) or within the taxon Spiralia. The backbone makes it possible to develop a basic understanding of the evolution of genes, molecules and structures in metazoan animals.     

Is The Amphibian Tree of Life really fatally flawed?

Wiens (2007 , Q. Rev. Biol. 82, 55–56) recently published a severe critique of Frost et al.'s (2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 297, 1–370) monographic study of amphibian systematics, concluding that it is “a disaster” and recommending that readers “simply ignore this study”. Beyond the hyperbole, Wiens raised four general objections that he regarded as “fatal flaws”: (1) the sampling design was insufficient for the generic changes made and taxonomic changes were made without including all type species; (2) the nuclear gene most commonly used in amphibian phylogenetics, RAG‐1, was not included, nor were the morphological characters that had justified the older taxonomy; (3) the analytical method employed is questionable because equally weighted parsimony “assumes that all characters are evolving at equal rates”; and (4) the results were at times “clearly erroneous”, as evidenced by the inferred non‐monophyly of marsupial frogs. In this paper we respond to these criticisms. In brief: (1) the study of Frost et al. did not exist in a vacuum and we discussed our evidence and evidence previously obtained by others that documented the non‐monophyletic taxa that we corrected. Beyond that, we agree that all type species should ideally be included, but inclusion of all potentially relevant type species is not feasible in a study of the magnitude of Frost et al. and we contend that this should not prevent progress in the formulation of phylogenetic hypotheses or their application outside of systematics. (2) Rhodopsin, a gene included by Frost et al. is the nuclear gene that is most commonly used in amphibian systematics, not RAG‐1. Regardless, ignoring a study because of the absence of a single locus strikes us as unsound practice. With respect to previously hypothesized morphological synapomorphies, Frost et al. provided a lengthy review of the published evidence for all groups, and this was used to inform taxonomic decisions. We noted that confirming and reconciling all morphological transformation series published among previous studies needed to be done, and we included evidence from the only published data set at that time to explicitly code morphological characters (including a number of traditionally applied synapomorphies from adult morphology) across the bulk of the diversity of amphibians (Haas, 2003, Cladistics 19, 23–90). Moreover, the phylogenetic results of the Frost et al. study were largely consistent with previous morphological and molecular studies and where they differed, this was discussed with reference to the weight of evidence. (3) The claim that equally weighted parsimony assumes that all characters are evolving at equal rates has been shown to be false in both analytical and simulation studies. (4) The claimed “strong support” for marsupial frog monophyly is questionable. Several studies have also found marsupial frogs to be non‐monophyletic. Wiens et al. (2005, Syst. Biol. 54, 719–748) recovered marsupial frogs as monophyletic, but that result was strongly supported only by Bayesian clade confidence values (which are known to overestimate support) and bootstrap support in his parsimony analysis was < 50%. Further, in a more recent parsimony analysis of an expanded data set that included RAG‐1 and the three traditional morphological synapomorphies of marsupial frogs, Wiens et al. (2006, Am. Nat. 168, 579–596) also found them to be non‐monophyletic. Although we attempted to apply the rule of monophyly to the naming of taxonomic groups, our phylogenetic results are largely consistent with conventional views even if not with the taxonomy current at the time of our writing. Most of our taxonomic changes addressed examples of non‐monophyly that had previously been known or suspected (e.g., the non‐monophyly of traditional Hyperoliidae, Microhylidae, Hemiphractinae, Leptodactylidae, Phrynobatrachus, Ranidae, Rana, Bufo; and the placement of Brachycephalus within “Eleutherodactylus”, and Lineatriton within “Pseudoeurycea”), and it is troubling that Wiens and others, as evidenced by recent publications, continue to perpetuate recognition of non‐monophyletic taxonomic groups that so profoundly misrepresent what is known about amphibian phylogeny. © The Willi Hennig Society 2007.     

On quality of evidence in phylogeny reconstruction: a reply to Zrzavý's defence of the 'Ecdysozoa' hypothesis

Zrzavý’s arguments against the critical analyses of data supporting the Ecdysozoa hypothesis (Wägele et al., J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 37, 211–223, 1999) are discussed. Zrzavý does not understand that the same basic principle of a priori weighting can be applied to sequence data as well as to morphological characters. Quality of evidence is the same as probability of homology, which is estimated from the number of discernible identical details. In sequences it is the number of identical nucleotides. Spectral analyses, dismissed by Zrzavý, visualize patterns of putative homologies present in alignments and also the number of positions supporting splits by chance alone. In cases in which old phylogenetic signals for a given monophylum are eroded in a gene, plesiomorphies and chance patterns will have strong influence on tree topologies and spectra. If plesiomorphies are a cause of errors, the addition of taxa that shorten internal branches is a remedy, although, in many cases such taxa may be extinct. The place of a priori estimations of data quality in a sequence of steps necessary for a phylogenetic analysis is shown. Morphological complexity is used as a proxy for a complex genetic basis and is used as a major criterion to compare characters of the Ecdysozoa and the Articulata. The details associated with the character ‘complex cuticle’ are discussed. Neither moulting nor the known components of the cuticle are novelties occurring only in Ecdysozoa. A published total evidence analysis is used to show that the number of coded characters does not necessarily reflect the quality of the data set. Zrzavý’s misunderstanding of the role of evolutionary scenarios is clarified and the importance of the use of additional biological data for plausibility arguments is explained. Plausibility arguments in favour of the Articulata hypothesis rely on facts found in functional morphology and in the fossil record. Zrzavý’s critique follows the actual mainstream but does not uncover logical mistakes or erroneous data analyses in the work of 86 . It is concluded that the Articulata hypothesis is a well‐founded alternative to the Ecdysozoa; it is based on much better morphological evidence and supported by plausibility arguments that currently do not exist for the Ecdysozoa.     

Mitochondrial cytochrome b of the Lyakhov mammoth (Proboscidea,Mammalia): new data and phylogenetic analyses of Elephantidae

The phylogenetic relationships between recent Elephantidae (Proboscidea, Mammalia), that is to say extant elephants (Asian and African) and extinct woolly mammoth, have remained unclear to date. The prevailing morphological scheme (mammoth grouped with Asian elephant) is either supported or questioned by the molecular results. Recently, the monophyly of woolly mammoths on mitochondrial grounds has been demonstrated (Thomas, et al., 2000), but it conflicts with previous studies (Barriel et al., 1999; Derenko et al., 1997). Here, we report the partial sequencing of two mitochondrial genes: 128 bp of 12S rDNA and 561 bp of cytochrome b for the Lyakhov mammoth, a 49,000-year-old Siberian individual. We use the most comprehensive sample of mammoth (11 sequences) to determine whether the sequences achieved by former studies were congruent or not. The monophyly of a major subset of mammoths sequences (including ours) is recovered. Such a result is assumed to be a good criterion for ascertaining the origin of ancient DNA. Our sequence is incongruent with that of Yang et al. (1996), though obtained for the same individual. As far as the latter sequence is concerned, a contamination by non-identified exogenous DNA is suspected. The robustness and reliability of the sister group relation between Mammuthus primigenius and Loxodonta africana are examined: down-weighting saturated substitutions has no impact on the topology; analyzing data partitions proves that the support of this clade can be assigned to the most conservative phylogenetic signal; insufficient taxonomic and/or characters sampling contributed to former discordant conclusions. We therefore assume the monophyly of "real mammoth sequences" and the (Mammuthus, Loxodonta) clade.     

The complete mitochondrial genome of the onychophoran Epiperipatus biolleyi reveals a unique transfer RNA set and provides further support for the ecdysozoa hypothesis

Onychophora (velvet worms) play a crucial role in current discussions on position of arthropods. The ongoing Articulata/Ecdysozoa debate is in need of additional ground pattern characters for Panarthropoda (Arthropoda, Tardigrada, and Onychophora). Hence, Onychophora is an important outgroup taxon in resolving the relationships among arthropods, irrespective of whether morphological or molecular data are used. To date, there has been a noticeable lack of mitochondrial genome data from onychophorans. Here, we present the first complete mitochondrial genome sequence of an onychophoran, Epiperipatus biolleyi (Peripatidae), which shows several characteristic features. Specifically, the gene order is considerably different from that in other arthropods and other bilaterians. In addition, there is a lack of 9 tRNA genes usually present in bilaterian mitochondrial genomes. All these missing tRNAs have anticodon sequences corresponding to 4-fold degenerate codons, whereas the persisting 13 tRNAs all have anticodons pairing with 2-fold degenerate codons. Sequence-based phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial protein-coding genes provides a robust support for a clade consisting of Onychophora, Priapulida, and Arthropoda, which confirms the Ecdysozoa hypothesis. However, resolution of the internal ecdysozoan relationships suffers from a cluster of long-branching taxa (including Nematoda and Platyhelminthes) and a lack of data from Tardigrada and further nemathelminth taxa in addition to nematodes and priapulids.     

A strong Madagascan rainforest MDE and no equatorward increase in species richness: re-analysis of 'The missing Madagascan mid-domain effect', by Kerr J.T., Perring M. & Currie D.J. (Ecology Letters 9:149-159, 2006)

By reanalysing inaccurately presented data of Kerr et al. (2006) , we refute their claims that area-corrected species richness of endemic Madagascan birds and mammals increases toward the Equator and is best explained by environmental factors, and that the rainforest mid-domain effect (MDE) Lees et al. (1999) demonstrated is artefactual.     

The evolution of the Ecdysozoa

Ecdysozoa is a clade composed of eight phyla: the arthropods, tardigrades and onychophorans that share segmentation and appendages and the nematodes, nematomorphs, priapulids, kinorhynchs and loriciferans, which are worms with an anterior proboscis or introvert. Ecdysozoa contains the vast majority of animal species and there is a great diversity of body plans among both living and fossil members. The monophyly of the clade has been called into question by some workers based on analyses of whole genome datasets. We review the evidence that now conclusively supports the unique origin of these phyla. Relationships within Ecdysozoa are also controversial and we discuss the molecular and morphological evidence for a number of monophyletic groups within this superphylum.     

Diagnosis of Dysponetinae (Chrysopetalidae,Annelida)

The subfamily Dysponetinae (Annelida, Chrysopetalidae) was proposed by Aguado et al. (Cladistics 29, 610) based on a phylogenetic analysis including morphological and molecular information. However, as a differential diagnosis of the new subfamily, as required by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, was not included, the name was not made available. A diagnosis of the subfamily is proposed herein to correct this oversight.     

Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria

Inferring the relationships among Bilateria has been an active and controversial research area since Haeckel. The lack of a sufficient number of phylogenetically reliable characters was the main limitation of traditional phylogenies based on morphology. With the advent of molecular data, this problem has been replaced by another one, statistical inconsistency, which stems from an erroneous interpretation of convergences induced by multiple changes. The analysis of alignments rich in both genes and species, combined with a probabilistic method (maximum likelihood or Bayesian) using sophisticated models of sequence evolution, should alleviate these two major limitations. We applied this approach to a dataset of 94 genes and 79 species using CAT, a previously developed model accounting for site-specific amino acid replacement patterns. The resulting tree is in good agreement with current knowledge: the monophyly of most major groups (e.g. Chordata, Arthropoda, Lophotrochozoa, Ecdysozoa, Protostomia) was recovered with high support. Two results are surprising and are discussed in an evo-devo framework: the sister-group relationship of Platyhelminthes and Annelida to the exclusion of Mollusca, contradicting the Neotrochozoa hypothesis, and, with a lower statistical support, the paraphyly of Deuterostomia. These results, in particular the status of deuterostomes, need further confirmation, both through increased taxonomic sampling, and future improvements of probabilistic models.     

An EST screen from the annelid Pomatoceros lamarckii reveals patterns of gene loss and gain in animals

Background  

Since the drastic reorganisation of the phylogeny of the animal kingdom into three major clades of bilaterians; Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa and Deuterostomia, it became glaringly obvious that the selection of model systems with extensive molecular resources was heavily biased towards only two of these three clades, namely the Ecdysozoa and Deuterostomia. Increasing efforts have been put towards redressing this imbalance in recent years, and one of the principal phyla in the vanguard of this endeavour is the Annelida.     

Bilaterian Phylogeny Based on Analyses of a Region of the Sodium–Potassium ATPase β-Subunit Gene

Molecular investigations of deep-level relationships within and among the animal phyla have been hampered by a lack of slowly evolving genes that are amenable to study by molecular systematists. To provide new data for use in deep-level metazoan phylogenetic studies, primers were developed to amplify a 1.3-kb region of the subunit of the nuclear-encoded sodium–potassium ATPase gene from 31 bilaterians representing several phyla. Maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian analyses of these sequences (combined with ATPase sequences for 23 taxa downloaded from GenBank) yield congruent trees that corroborate recent findings based on analyses of other data sets (e.g., the 18S ribosomal RNA gene). The ATPase-based trees support monophyly for several clades (including Lophotrochozoa, a form of Ecdysozoa, Vertebrata, Mollusca, Bivalvia, Gastropoda, Arachnida, Hexapoda, Coleoptera, and Diptera) but do not support monophyly for Deuterostomia, Arthropoda, or Nemertea. Parametric bootstrapping tests reject monophyly for Arthropoda and Nemertea but are unable to reject deuterostome monophyly. Overall, the sodium–potassium ATPase -subunit gene appears to be useful for deep-level studies of metazoan phylogeny.     

Review of data for a morphological look on Xenacoelomorpha (Bilateria incertae sedis)

Recent investigations by means of high-tech morphology, evo-devo studies and molecular data suggest that the taxon Xenacoelomorpha (Nemertodermatida and Acoela plus Xenoturbella), formerly considered as primitive flatworms (Plathelminthes) or even bivalve Mollusca, represents either a quite plesiomorphic grouping as the earliest bilaterian offshoot or but is a substantially reduced and simplified sidebranch of ambulacralian Deuterostomia. Herein, I provide a compilation and review of the current morphological data and possible interpretations of the various character states. Phenotypic and genotypic data suggest monophyly of Xenacoelomorpha. There is no specific similarity between xenacoelmorphs and deuerostome larvae, and reduction appears improbable in free-living and predatory animals. Accordingly, Xenacoelomorpha are more likely similar to Urbilateria rather than degenerated and simplified coelomate deuterostomes. If so, the ground pattern of Bilateria has been retained only partially in the remaining main bilaterian clades (Nephrozoa) after the deviation of the Xenacoelomorpha, namely the nervous system in the Deuterostomia and the body cavity conditions in the acoelomate Lophotrochozoa (particularly Platyzoa), Gastrotricha and cycloneuralian Ecdysozoa.     

The Comparison of β-Thymosin Homologues Among Metazoa Supports an Arthropod-Nematode Clade

The definition of an Ecdysozoa clade among the protostomians, including all phyla with a regularly molted α-chitin-rich cuticle, has been one of the most provocative hypotheses to arise from recent investigations on animal phylogeny. Here we present evidence in favor of an arthropod-nematode clade, from the comparison of β-thymosin homologues among the Metazoa. Arthropods and nematodes share the absence of the highly conserved β-thymosin form found in all other documented bilaterian phyla as well as sponges, and the possession of a very unusual, internally triplicated homologue of the β-thymosin protein, unknown in other phyla. We argue that such discrete molecular character is phylogenetically very powerful and provides strong evidence for the monophyly of an arthropod-nematode clade. Received: 17 December 1999 / Accepted: 7 July 2000     

Towards simultaneous analysis of morphological and molecular data in Hymenoptera

Principles and methods of simultaneous analysis in cladistics are reviewed, and the first, preliminary, analysis of combined molecular and morphological data on higher level relationships in Hymenoptera is presented to exemplify these principles. The morphological data from Ronquist et al . (1999) matrix, derived from the character diagnoses of the phylogenetic tree of Rasnitsyn (1988) , are combined with new molecular data for representatives of 10 superfamilies of Hymenoptera by means of optimization alignment. The resulting cladogram supports Apocrita and Aculeata as groups, and the superfamly Chrysidoidea, but not Chalcidoidea, Evanioidea, Vespoidea and Apoidea.     

An AFLP clock for absolute dating of shallow‐time evolutionary history – too good to be true?

A major drawback of Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLP) as genetic makers for phylogeographic studies is their lack of a temporal dimension. In a recent publication in Molecular Ecology, Kropf et al. (2009) proposed a molecular clock for AFLP. In this comment we evaluate the proposed approach both theoretically and empirically. A linear increase with time is a prerequisite to use a genetic distance as molecular clock. Testing the relationship between genetic distance and time in the data of Kropf et al. (2009) for linearity revealed that the relationship was in fact not linear for their pooled data, as well as for one of the three species analyzed. Also, the relationship was not linear in two new species, where divergence times could be inferred from macrofossils. When applying the proposed molecular clock to data from eight species, dates obtained were plausible in some cases, but very improbable in others. The suggested genetic distance was also influenced by intrapopulation genetic diversity, leading to a potential bias. In the future, investigations of AFLP mutation rates combined with phylogeographic modelling may contribute to adding a time scale to the understanding of AFLP data.