Mx proteins: antiviral proteins by chance or by necessity?

The interferon-inducible Mx1 protein is responsible for inborn resistance of mice to influenza. It is now recognized that this protein is a member of a family of interferon-inducible, putative GTP-binding proteins found in many organisms. Thus, these proteins, called the Mx proteins, are found in species that are naturally infected with influenza virus, and also in species that are not. Some Mx proteins display a broader antiviral profile than the one observed for Mx1 in mice. Others, however, may not be antiviral. Two recently discovered GTP-binding proteins, Vps1p in yeast and dynamin in rat, are also related to Mx1. These proteins are synthesized constitutively and serve basic cellular functions.     

Mobility of photosynthetic proteins

The mobility of photosynthetic proteins represents an important factor that affects light-energy conversion in photosynthesis. The specific feature of photosynthetic proteins mobility can be currently measured in vivo using advanced microscopic methods, such as fluorescence recovery after photobleaching which allows the direct observation of photosynthetic proteins mobility on a single cell level. The heterogeneous organization of thylakoid membrane proteins results in heterogeneity in protein mobility. The thylakoid membrane contains both, protein-crowded compartments with immobile proteins and fluid areas (less crowded by proteins), allowing restricted diffusion of proteins. This heterogeneity represents an optimal balance as protein crowding is necessary for efficient light-energy conversion, and protein mobility plays an important role in the regulation of photosynthesis. The mobility is required for an optimal light-harvesting process (e.g., during state transitions), and also for transport of proteins during their synthesis or repair. Protein crowding is then a key limiting factor of thylakoid membrane protein mobility; the less thylakoid membranes are crowded by proteins, the higher protein mobility is observed. Mobility of photosynthetic proteins outside the thylakoid membrane (lumen and stroma/cytosol) is less understood. Cyanobacterial phycobilisomes attached to the stromal side of the thylakoid can move relatively fast. Therefore, it seems that stroma with their active enzymes of the Calvin–Benson cycle, are a more fluid compartment in comparison to the rather rigid thylakoid lumen. In conclusion, photosynthetic protein diffusion is generally slower in comparison to similarly sized proteins from other eukaryotic membranes or organelles. Mobility of photosynthetic proteins resembles restricted protein diffusion in bacteria, and has been rationalized by high protein crowding similar to that of thylakoids.     

Interaction of DnaK with native proteins and membrane proteins correlates with their accessible hydrophobicity

Molecular chaperones are involved in protein folding, protein targeting to membranes, and protein renaturation after stress. They interact specifically with hydrophobic sequences that are exposed in unfolded proteins, and buried in native proteins. We have studied the interaction of DnaK with native water-soluble proteins and membrane proteins. DnaK–native protein interactions are characterized by dissociation constants between 1 and 50 μM (compared with 0.01–1 μM for unfolded proteins). This affinity is within the range of most intracellular protein concentrations, suggesting that DnaK interacts with a greater number of native proteins than previously suspected. We found a correlation between the affinity of native proteins for DnaK and their affinity for hydrophobic-interaction chromatography adsorbents, suggesting that DnaK interacts with exposed hydrophobic groups in native proteins. The interaction between DnaK and membrane proteins is characterized by DnaK's high affinity for detergent-solubilized membrane proteins, and its lower affinity for membrane proteins inserted in lipid bilayers, suggesting that the chaperone can interact with the hydrophobic sequences of the former, while it cannot penetrate the hydrophobic core of lipid bilayers. Thus, the specificity of DnaK for hydrophobic sequences is involved in its interaction with not only unfolded proteins, but also native water-soluble proteins and membrane proteins. All proteins interact with DnaK according to their exposed hydrophobicity.     

Calcium-binding proteins inAplysia neurons

1. Calcium (Ca)-binding proteins of neuronal ganglia and of single, identified neurons of the marine mollusk, Aplysia californica, were investigated. Using transblot/45Ca overlays two proteins, at Mr 45,000 and Mr 23,000, with a high Ca-binding ability were found. 2. Western blot analysis revealed that the protein at Mr 45,000 could be separated by 2D-PAGE into proteins with Mr 40,000 and Mr 43,000. The protein at Mr 40,000 immunocross-reacted with antisera directed against parvalbumin and rat calbindin D-28K, indicating a novel Ca-binding protein sharing common antigenic determinants for both proteins. 3. The protein at Mr 23,000 could be separated into a group of proteins with Mr 13,000-20,000 which showed a high degree of similarity to sarcoplasmatic calcium-binding proteins (SCP). 4. We further investigated the protein pattern of single, identified neurons of different electrical activity (bursting, beating, and silent) by 2D-PAGE. Major differences were found in the range of low Mr and low pI, where Ca-binding proteins are generally located. A protein at high concentrations characteristic for silent cells migrated at a position similar to crayfish SCP. 5. The results show that various Ca-binding proteins are characteristic for neurons in the Aplysia nervous system and support the idea that they may effect the electrical behavior of nerve cells.     

Structured proteins and proteins with internal disorder

The point of view that a uniquely folded protein tertiary structure is required for the protein functioning has been prevailing in the literature quite recently. However of lately it has been found that many proteins in a cell have no such structure in an isolated state, though they have a well-defined function in physiological conditions. These proteins were named as proteins with natural or internal disorder. The portion of disordered regions in such proteins may vary from a sequence of several amino acids to a completely disordered sequence containing from tens to hundreds of amino acids. The main difference of these proteins from the structured (globular) ones is that they have no unique tertiary structure in an isolated state and acquire it after interaction with their partners. Their conformation in such a complex depends on the interacting partner and not only on their own amino acid sequence, which is specific for structured (globular) proteins. The problem of structural and functional relations in the structured proteins and proteins with internal disorder is discussed in this review. The complexity of the problem and its potential solutions are illustrated by the example of elongation factors EFlA.     

Strategies for crystallizing membrane proteins

Crystallizing membrane proteins remains a challenging endeavor despite the increasing number of membrane protein structures solved by X-ray crystallography. The critical factors in determining the success of the crystallization experiments are the purification and preparation of membrane protein samples. Moreover, there is the added complication that the crystallization conditions must be optimized for use in the presence of detergents although the methods used to crystallize most membrane proteins are, in essence, straightforward applications of standard methodologies for soluble protein crystallization. The roles that detergents play in the stability and aggregation of membrane proteins as well as the colloidal properties of the protein-detergent complexes need to be appreciated and controlledbefore and during the crystallization trials. All X-ray quality crystals of membrane proteins were grown from preparations of detergent-solubilized protein, where the heterogeneous natural lipids from the membrane have been replaced by ahomogeneous detergent environment. It is the preparation of such monodisperse, isotropic solutions of membrane proteins that has allowed the successful application of the standard crystallization methods routinely used on soluble proteins. In this review, the issues of protein purification and sample preparation are addressed as well as the new refinements in crystallization methodologies for membrane proteins. How the physical behavior of the detergent, in the form of micelles or protein-detergent aggregates, affects crystallization and the adaptation of published protocols to new membrane protein systems are also addressed. The general conclusion is that many integral membrane proteins could be crystallized if pure and monodisperse preparations in a suitable detergent system can be prepared.In memory of Glenn D. Garavito.     

Sphingolipid-binding proteins

Emerging information on sphingolipid metabolism and signaling is leading to a better understanding of cellular processes such as apoptosis, cancer, cell survival and aging. In this review, we discuss the involvement of sphingolipids in these processes and focus on underlying mechanisms based on sphingolipid:protein interactions. Due to the inherent difficulty of studying lipids, we discuss techniques that are useful in the elucidation of these interactions. We classify sphingolipid-binding proteins into four main classes: receptor, effector, enzyme, and transporter. Known structures of sphingolipid-binding proteins are surveyed, and sphingolipid-binding characteristics are described, acknowledging the limitations that there are presently insufficient protein:sphingolipid complexes for more definitive conclusions on this topic. Finally we summarize relevant literature to better inform the reader about sphingolipid:protein interactions.     

Non-canonical functions of RGS proteins

Regulators of G protein signalling (RGS) proteins are united into a family by the presence of the RGS domain which serves as a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for various Galpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. Through this mechanism, RGS proteins regulate signalling of numerous G protein-coupled receptors. In addition to the RGS domains, RGS proteins contain diverse regions of various lengths that regulate intracellular localization, GAP activity or receptor selectivity of RGS proteins, often through interaction with other partners. However, it is becoming increasingly appreciated that through these non-RGS regions, RGS proteins can serve non-canonical functions distinct from inactivation of Galpha subunits. This review summarizes the data implicating RGS proteins in the (i) regulation of G protein signalling by non-canonical mechanisms, (ii) regulation of non-G protein signalling, (iii) signal transduction from receptors not coupled to G proteins, (iv) activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases, and (v) non-canonical functions in the nucleus.     

Mammalian prion proteins

The past two years have seen the extension of our knowledge on the cellular prion protein structure with new NMR data on both the hamster and human proteins. In addition, the folding dynamics of two cellular prion proteins have been elucidated. There are now several examples of recombinant prion proteins that are able to adopt different conformations in solution and recent work on the molecular basis of prion strains has done much to consolidate the protein-only hypothesis. Important advances in relating disease to structure have also been made through the identification of the minimal prion protein fragment that is capable of conferring susceptibility to and propagation of the scrapie agent.     

Glycolipid-binding proteins

Proteins which bind glycolipids with high specificity are tentatively divided into two groups. One group consists of activator proteins involved in the catabolism of glycolipids by acid lysosomal hydrolases. Two activator proteins, GM2-activator and sphingolipid activator protein-1, are critically appraised on their glycolipid-binding properties and on their activity to facilitate the transfer of glycolipids. These proteins are glycoproteins localized in the lysosomes. Their molecular weights are in a range of 21 000-27 000, and isoelectric points are 4-5. Glycolipid transfer protein (GLTP) is included in the other group. GLTP purified from pig brain has a molecular weight of about 20 000 and an isoelectric point of 8.3. GLTP facilitates the transfer of various glycosphingolipids and glyceroglycolipids between membranes. The protein does not facilitate the transfer of phospholipids or cholesterol. GLTP binds galactosylceramide. The galactosylceramide-GLTP complex participates in the transfer reaction as the intermediate. Each protein in both groups binds glycolipids with a characteristic specificity to the sugar moiety. A stoichiometry of 1 mol of lipid per mol of protein has been found in all three proteins. Proteins in both groups seem to have a hydrophobic region on their surface, since all three proteins have been efficiently purified by hydrophobic chromatography.     

Stability of crystalline proteins

By using two model proteins, glucose oxidase and lipase, we demonstrate that dry crystalline formulations are significantly more stable than their amorphous counterparts. The results of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy indicate that crystalline proteins better maintain their native conformation in accelerated stability studies. The lower tendency of crystalline proteins to aggregate is confirmed by size-exclusion chromatography. The data suggest that protein crystallization may significantly improve some aspects of protein handling, and change the way biopharmaceuticals are produced, formulated, and delivered.     

Ribosomal proteins in halobacteria

The amino acid sequences of 16 ribosomal proteins from archaebacterium Halobacterium marismortui have been determined by a direct protein chemical method. In addition, amino acid sequences of three proteins, S11, S18, and L25, have been established by DNA sequencing of their genes as well as by protein sequencing. Comparison of their sequences with those of ribosomal proteins from other organisms revealed that proteins S14, S16, S19, and L25 are related to both eukaryotic and eubacterial ribosomal proteins, being more homologous to eukaryotic than eubacterial counterparts, and proteins S12, S15, and L16 are related to only eukaryotic ribosomal proteins. Furthermore, some proteins are found to be similar to only eubacterial proteins, whereas other proteins show no homology to any other known ribosomal proteins. Comparisons of amino acid compositions between halophilic and nonhalophilic ribosomal proteins revealed that halophilic proteins gain aspartic and glutamic acid residues and significantly lose lysine and arginine residues. In addition, halophilic proteins seem to lose isoleucine as compared with Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins.     

Two endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane proteins that facilitate ER-to-Golgi transport of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins

Many eukaryotic cell surface proteins are anchored in the lipid bilayer through glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI). GPI anchors are covalently attached in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The modified proteins are then transported through the secretory pathway to the cell surface. We have identified two genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, LAG1 and a novel gene termed DGT1 (for "delayed GPI-anchored protein transport"), encoding structurally related proteins with multiple membrane-spanning domains. Both proteins are localized to the ER, as demonstrated by immunofluorescence microscopy. Deletion of either gene caused no detectable phenotype, whereas lag1Delta dgt1Delta cells displayed growth defects and a significant delay in ER-to-Golgi transport of GPI-anchored proteins, suggesting that LAG1 and DGT1 encode functionally redundant or overlapping proteins. The rate of GPI anchor attachment was not affected, nor was the transport rate of several non-GPI-anchored proteins. Consistent with a role of Lag1p and Dgt1p in GPI-anchored protein transport, lag1Delta dgt1Delta cells deposit abnormal, multilayered cell walls. Both proteins have significant sequence similarity to TRAM, a mammalian membrane protein thought to be involved in protein translocation across the ER membrane. In vivo translocation studies, however, did not detect any defects in protein translocation in lag1Delta dgt1Delta cells, suggesting that neither yeast gene plays a role in this process. Instead, we propose that Lag1p and Dgt1p facilitate efficient ER-to-Golgi transport of GPI-anchored proteins.     

Utilizing chimeric proteins for exploring the cellular fate of endogenous proteins.

We recently designed and constructed chimeric proteins for the elimination of specific cell populations. These chimeric proteins are composed of a targeting component fused to an apoptotic protein as the killing moiety. However, chimeric proteins can serve not only to eliminate cell populations, but also as "biological tools" for studying the fate of endogenous proteins. We show here that upon entering their target cell, a variety of chimeric proteins composed of an endogenous protein as their killing moiety reach the subcellular location of their endogenous counterpart. In contrast, bacterial-based killing domains head for the subcellular site of their substrate. Moreover, the chimeric protein acts similarly to the endogenous protein, while causing the cell to die. Therefore, chimeric proteins may serve as a unique tool for investigating cellular proteins and their intracellular localization, without the need to overexpress them.     

Calmodulin-binding proteins in brain

It is now widely accepted that actions of intracellular Ca²⁺ are mediated by a four-domain Ca²⁺-binding protein, calmodulin. Brain is especially rich in calmodulin, containing about 400 mg (24 μmol) of EGTA-extractable calmodulin per kg of brain. However, only a fraction of the above amount is required for the calmodulin-activated enzymes and most of the rest may be assigned to calmodulin-binding proteins, proteins which are apparently devoid of enzyme activities but undergo Ca²⁺-dependent associations with calmodulin. Several of such proteins have been recently discovered in brain. These include a heat-labile 80 K phosphodiesterase inhibitor protein (calcineurin), a heat-stable 70 K phosphodiesterase inhibitor protein, a 50 K protein, myelin basic protein, tubulin, microtubule τ (tau) factor, a spectrin-like doublet protein (240 plus 235 K) (calspectin; fodrin) and a particle-associated 155 K protein.Functions of these calmodulin-binding proteins have not been fully elucidated yet. Some proteins may be calmodulin-regulated enzymes catalyzing yet unknown biochemical reactions, e.g. a protein phosphatase activity was found for calcineurin. Some proteins may interact with contractile elements or cytoskeleton of the cell, e.g. τ factor and calspectin interacted with tubulin and F-actin, respectively and tubulin itself is a calmodulin-binding protein. So, interesting possibilities are the regulation of the functions of cytoskeleton by calmodulin through these calmodulin-binding proteins. Regulation of microtubule assembly by Ca²⁺-dependent binding of calmodulin to tubulin and/or τ factor and possible involvement of calspectin in the mechanism regulating axonal transport of neuronal proteins have been suggested. Thus, the exploration of the regulating functions of Ca²⁺/calmodulin in brain depends largely upon the further study of the properties of these calmodulin-binding proteins.     

RGS proteins have a signalling complex: interactions between RGS proteins and GPCRs, effectors, and auxiliary proteins

The intracellular regulator of G protein signalling (RGS) proteins were first identified as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) for heterotrimeric G proteins, however, it was later found that they can also regulate G protein-effector interactions in other ways that are still not well understood. There is increasing evidence that some of the effects of RGS proteins occur due to their ability to interact with multiprotein signalling complexes. In this review, we will discuss recent evidence that supports the idea that RGS proteins can bind to proteins other than Galpha, such as G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs, e.g. muscarinic, dopaminergic, adrenergic, angiotensin, interleukin and opioid receptors) and effectors (e.g. adenylyl cyclase, GIRK channels, PDEgamma, PLC-beta and Ca(2+) channels). Furthermore, we will investigate novel RGS binding partners (e.g. GIPC, spinophilin, 14-3-3) that underlie the formation of signalling scaffolds or govern RGS protein availability and/or activity.