Genomic analysis of the nitrate response using a nitrate reductase-null mutant of Arabidopsis

A nitrate reductase (NR)-null mutant of Arabidopsis was constructed that had a deletion of the major NR gene NIA2 and an insertion in the NIA1 NR gene. This mutant had no detectable NR activity and could not use nitrate as the sole nitrogen source. Starch mobilization was not induced by nitrate in this mutant but was induced by ammonium, indicating that nitrate was not the signal for this process. Microarray analysis of gene expression revealed that 595 genes responded to nitrate (5 mm nitrate for 2 h) in both wild-type and mutant plants. This group of genes was overrepresented most significantly in the functional categories of energy, metabolism, and glycolysis and gluconeogenesis. Because the nitrate response of these genes was NR independent, nitrate and not a downstream metabolite served as the signal. The microarray analysis also revealed that shoots can be as responsive to nitrate as roots, yet there was substantial organ specificity to the nitrate response.     

Signal storage in phytochrome action on nitrate-mediated induction of nitrate and nitrite reductases in mustard seedling cotyledons

Application of nitrate leads to an induction of nitrate reductase (NR; EC 1.6.6.1) and nitrite reductase (NIR; EC 1.7.7.1) in the cotyledons of dark-grown mustard (Sinapis alba L.) seedlings, and this induction can strongly be promoted by a far-red-light pretreatment — operating through phytochrome — prior to nitrate application. This light treatment is almost ineffective — as far as enzyme appearance is concerned — if no nitrate is given. When nitrate is applied, the stored light signal potentiates the appearance of NR and NIR in darkness, even in the absence of active phytochrome, to the same extent as continuous far-red light. This action of previously stored light signal lasts for approx. 12 h.Storage of the light signal was measured for NR and NIR. The process shows enzyme-specific differences. Storage occurs in the absence as well as in the presence of nitrate, i.e. irrespective of whether or not enzyme synthesis takes place. The kinetics of signal transduction and signal storage indicate that the formation and action of the stored signal are a bypass to the process of direct signal transduction. Signal storage is possibly a means of enabling the plant to maintain the appropriate levels of NR and NIR during the dark period of the natural light/dark cycle.Abbreviations cD continuous darkness - cFR continuous far-red light - D darkness - FR far-red light - NIR nitrite reductase (EC 1.7.7.1) - NR nitrate reductase (EC 1.6.6.1) - Pfr phytochrome (far-red absorbing) - Pr phytochrome (red absorbing) - R red light - RG9-light long wavelength far-red light obtained with RG9 glass filter - - Ptot total phytochrome (Pr+Pfr) Professor Wilhelm Nultsch mit guten Wünschen zum 60. Geburtstag     

Nitrate-independent expression of plant nitrate reductase in Lotus japonicus root nodules

Nitrate-independent nitrate reductase (NR) activity is generally found in legume root nodules. Therefore, the effects of nitrate on plant NR activity and mRNA were investigated in the root nodules of Lotus japonicus (L. japonicus). Both NR activity and mRNA levels in roots and root nodules were up-regulated by the addition of nitrate. In the absence of nitrate, NR activity and mRNA were detected in root nodules but not in roots. Southern blotting analysis indicates that NR is encoded by a single gene in L. japonicus. No nitrate was detected in the root nodules or roots of plants grown in the absence of nitrate, while its accumulation was observed in plants supplied with exogenous nitrate. These results indicate that inducible-type NR can be expressed in root nodules in the absence of nitrate. The activation state of the nitrate-independent activity of NR was as high as that of NR activity induced by nitrate. NR mRNA expressed independently of nitrate in root nodules without nitrate was localized in the infected regions of the root nodules. Thus, the expression could be related to the specific structure and environment of root nodules.     

The influence of sugars on nitrate reductase induction by exogenous nitrate or nitrite in excised pisum sativum roots

Nitrate reductase (NR) induction is enhanced by exogenously supplied sucrose in excised pea roots exposed to both exogenous nitrate and exogenous nitrite. NR synthesis is preferentially supported by sugars transported to the cells at the moment, however NR induction can take place for some time without exogenous sugar influx if roots are saturated with sugars during precultivation. Steady high NR levels are dependent on steady sugar and nitrate influxes. NR induction is low in roots precultivated for 20 h without sucrose although sugar content is still high in them. This suggests that compartmentation of sugars in the cells is of major importance during NR induction. Total nitrate content in roots exposed to nitrate is not influenced by sucrose supplied together with nitrate. Some nitrite is oxidized to nitrate in roots exposed to exogenous nitrite ; we assume that this nitrate is responsible for NR induction. Our results indicate that sugars, besides many indirect effects on NR induction, may also directly influence NR synthesis either as coinducers or as derepressors of NR synthesis. Our results further show that NR is not a product-inducible enzyme.