Differential Kinetochore Requirements for Establishment and Maintenance of the Spindle Checkpoint Are Dependent on the Mechanism of Checkpoint Activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The spindle checkpoint in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an intracellular signal transduction pathway comprised of two branches that inhibit two different mitotic transitions in cells treated with benzimidazole drugs such as nocodazole. The kinetochore is an integral component of the MAD2 branch of the spindle checkpoint pathway. Current models propose that the kinetochore is required for both the establishment and maintenance of the spindle checkpoint but a role for the kinetochore in the maintenance of spindle checkpoint in yeast has never been directly tested. We used a temperature sensitive ndc10-1 mutant to inactivate kinetochores before and after arresting cells in mitosis to determine the role of kinetochores in the establishment and maintenance of the spindle checkpoint. We show that both establishment and maintenance requires kinetochore function in response to spindle damage induced by benzimidazole drugs. Excess expression of the Mps1 protein kinase causes wild type cells and ndc10-1 cells to arrest in mitosis. Unlike the spindle checkpoint arrest activated by benzimidazoles, this arrest can be maintained independently of kinetochores. The arrest induced by excess Mps1p is independent of BUB2. Therefore, mitotic arrest induced by excess Mps1p expression is due to the action of the MAD2 branch of the spindle checkpoint pathway and excess Mps1p acts downstream of the kinetochore.     

Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast

Accurate chromosome segregation depends on precise regulation of mitosis by the spindle checkpoint. This checkpoint monitors the status of kinetochore-microtubule attachment and delays the metaphase to anaphase transition until all kinetochores have formed stable bipolar connections to the mitotic spindle. Components of the spindle checkpoint include the mitotic arrest defective (MAD) genes MAD1-3, and the budding uninhibited by benzimidazole (BUB) genes BUB1 and BUB3. In animal cells, all known spindle checkpoint proteins are recruited to kinetochores during normal mitoses. In contrast, we show that whereas Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bub1p and Bub3p are bound to kinetochores early in mitosis as part of the normal cell cycle, Mad1p and Mad2p are kinetochore bound only in the presence of spindle damage or kinetochore lesions that interfere with chromosome-microtubule attachment. Moreover, although Mad1p and Mad2p perform essential mitotic functions during every division cycle in mammalian cells, they are required in budding yeast only when mitosis goes awry. We propose that differences in the behavior of spindle checkpoint proteins in animal cells and budding yeast result primarily from evolutionary divergence in spindle assembly pathways.     

Requirement of Skp1-Bub1 interaction for kinetochore-mediated activation of the spindle checkpoint

The spindle checkpoint transiently prevents cell cycle progression of cells that have incurred errors or failed to complete steps during mitosis, including those involving kinetochore function. The molecular nature of the primary signal transmitted from defective kinetochores and how it is detected by the spindle checkpoint are unknown. We report biochemical evidence that Bub1, a component of the spindle checkpoint, associates with centromere (CEN) DNA via Skp1, a core kinetochore component in budding yeast. The Skp1's interaction with Bub1 is required for the mitotic delay induced by kinetochore tension defects, but not for the arrest induced by spindle depolymerization, kinetochore assembly defects, or Mps1 overexpression. We propose that the Skp1-Bub1 interaction is important for transmitting a signal to the spindle checkpoint pathway when insufficient tension is present at kinetochores.     

PRP4 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein required for MPS1, MAD1, and MAD2 localization to the kinetochores

The spindle checkpoint delays anaphase onset until every chromosome kinetochore has been efficiently captured by the mitotic spindle microtubules. In this study, we report that the human pre–messenger RNA processing 4 (PRP4) protein kinase associates with kinetochores during mitosis. PRP4 depletion by RNA interference induces mitotic acceleration. Moreover, we frequently observe lagging chromatids during anaphase leading to aneuploidy. PRP4-depleted cells do not arrest in mitosis after nocodazole treatment, indicating a spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) failure. Thus, we find that PRP4 is necessary for recruitment or maintenance of the checkpoint proteins MPS1, MAD1, and MAD2 at the kinetochores. Our data clearly identify PRP4 as a previously unrecognized kinetochore component that is necessary to establish a functional SAC.     

IBD2 encodes a novel component of the Bub2p-dependent spindle checkpoint in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

During mitosis, genomic integrity is maintained by the proper coordination of mitotic events through the spindle checkpoint. The bifurcated spindle checkpoint blocks cell cycle progression at metaphase by monitoring unattached kinetochores and inhibits mitotic exit in response to the incorrect orientation of the mitotic spindle. Bfa1p is a spindle checkpoint regulator of budding yeast in the Bub2p checkpoint pathway for proper mitotic exit. We have isolated a novel Bfa1p interacting protein named Ibd2p in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that IBD2 (Inhibition of Bud Division 2) is not an essential gene but its deletion mutant proceeded through the cell cycle in the presence of microtubule-destabilizing drugs, thereby inducing a sharp decrease in viability. In addition, overexpression of Mps1p caused partial mitotic arrest in ibd2Delta as well as in bub2Delta, suggesting that IBD2 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint downstream of MPS1. Overexpression of Ibd2p induced mitotic arrest with increased levels of Clb2p in wild type and mad2Delta, but not in deletion mutants of BUB2 and BFA1. Pds1p was also stabilized by the overexpression of Ibd2p in wild-type cells. The mitotic arrest defects observed in ibd2Delta in the presence of nocodazole were restored by additional copies of BUB2, BFA1, and CDC5, whereas an extra copy of IBD2 could not rescue the mitotic arrest defects of bub2Delta and bfa1Delta. The mitotic arrest defects of ibd2Delta were not recovered by MAD2, or vice versa. Analysis of the double mutant combinations ibd2Deltamad2Delta, ibd2Deltabub2Delta, and ibd2Deltadyn1Delta showed that IBD2 belongs to the BUB2 epistasis group. Taken together, these data demonstrate that IBD2 encodes a novel component of the BUB2-dependent spindle checkpoint pathway that functions upstream of BUB2 and BFA1.     

NEK2A interacts with MAD1 and possibly functions as a novel integrator of the spindle checkpoint signaling

Chromosome segregation in mitosis is orchestrated by protein kinase signaling cascades. A biochemical cascade named spindle checkpoint ensures the spatial and temporal order of chromosome segregation during mitosis. Here we report that spindle checkpoint protein MAD1 interacts with NEK2A, a human orthologue of the Aspergillus nidulans NIMA kinase. MAD1 interacts with NEK2A in vitro and in vivo via a leucine zipper-containing domain located at the C terminus of MAD1. Like MAD1, NEK2A is localized to HeLa cell kinetochore of mitotic cells. Elimination of NEK2A by small interfering RNA does not arrest cells in mitosis but causes aberrant premature chromosome segregation. NEK2A is required for MAD2 but not MAD1, BUB1, and HEC1 to associate with kinetochores. These NEK2A-eliminated or -suppressed cells display a chromosome bridge phenotype with sister chromatid inter-connected. Moreover, loss of NEK2A impairs mitotic checkpoint signaling in response to spindle damage by nocodazole, which affected mitotic escape and led to generation of cells with multiple nuclei. Our data demonstrate that NEK2A is a kinetochore-associated protein kinase essential for faithful chromosome segregation. We hypothesize that NEK2A links MAD2 molecular dynamics to spindle checkpoint signaling.     

Abnormal kinetochore structure activates the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells containing one or more abnormal kinetochores delay anaphase entry. The delay can be produced by using centromere DNA mutations present in single-copy or kinetochore protein mutations. This observation is strikingly similar to the preanaphase delay or arrest exhibited in animal cells that experience spontaneous or induced failures in bipolar attachment of one or more chromosomes and may reveal the existence of a conserved surveillance pathway that monitors the state of chromosome attachment to the spindle before anaphase. We find that three genes (MAD2, BUB1, and BUB2) that are required for the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast (defined by antimicrotubule drug-induced arrest or delay) are also required in the establishment and/or maintenance of kinetochore-induced delays. This was tested in strains in which the delays were generated by limited function of a mutant kinetochore protein (ctf13-30) or by the presence of a single-copy centromere DNA mutation (CDEII delta 31). Whereas the MAD2 and BUB1 genes were absolutely required for delay, loss of BUB2 function resulted in a partial delay defect, and we suggest that BUB2 is required for delay maintenance. The inability of mad2-1 and bub1 delta mutants to execute kinetochore-induced delay is correlated with striking increases in chromosome missegregation, indicating that the delay does indeed have a role in chromosome transmission fidelity. Our results also indicated that the yeast RAD9 gene, necessary for DNA damage-induced arrest, had no role in the kinetochore-induced delays. We conclude that abnormal kinetochore structures induce preanaphase delay by activating the same functions that have defined the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast.     

A Bub2p-dependent spindle checkpoint pathway regulates the Dbf2p kinase in budding yeast

Exit from mitosis in all eukaroytes requires inactivation of the mitotic kinase. This occurs principally by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of the cyclin subunit controlled by the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). However, an abnormal spindle and/or unattached kinetochores activates a conserved spindle checkpoint that blocks APC function. This leads to high mitotic kinase activity and prevents mitotic exit. DBF2 belongs to a group of budding yeast cell cycle genes that when mutated prevent cyclin degradation and block exit from mitosis. DBF2 encodes a protein kinase which is cell cycle regulated, peaking in metaphase-anaphase B/telophase, but its function remains unknown. Here, we show the Dbf2p kinase activity to be a target of the spindle checkpoint. It is controlled specifically by Bub2p, one of the checkpoint components that is conserved in fission yeast and higher eukaroytic cells. Significantly, in budding yeast, Bub2p shows few genetic or biochemical interactions with other members of the spindle checkpoint. Our data now point to the protein kinase Mps1p triggering a new parallel branch of the spindle checkpoint in which Bub2p blocks Dbf2p function.     

Role of the kinetochore protein Ndc10 in mitotic checkpoint activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mitotic checkpoints delay cell cycle progression in response to alterations in the mitotic apparatus, thus ensuring correct chromosome segregation. While improper spindle orientation activates the Bub2/Bfa1-dependent checkpoint in budding yeast, delaying exit from mitosis, lack of bipolar kinetochore-microtubule attachment activates a signal transduction cascade that prevents both anaphase onset and exit from mitosis by inhibiting the Cdc20/APC (Anaphase Promoting Complex)-mediated proteolysis of securin and inactivation of mitotic cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), respectively. Proteolysis of the securin Pdsl is necessary to liberate the separase Esp1, which then triggers sister chromatid separation, whereas inactivation of mitotic CDKs is a prerequisite for exit from mitosis and for starting a new round of DNA replication in the next cell cycle. In budding yeast, this latter checkpoint response involves the proteins Mad1, 2, 3, Bub1 and Bub3, whose vertebrate counterparts localize to unattached kinetochores. Mutations that alter other kinetochore proteins result in mitotic checkpoint activation, while the ndc10-1 mutation not only impairs kinetochore function, but also disrupts the checkpoint response, indicating a role for Ndc10 in this process. Here we present evidence that Ndc10 is not part of the Bub2/Bfa1-dependent pathway, and its role in the checkpoint response might also be different from that of the other Mad and Bub proteins. Indeed, Ndc10, unlike other mitotic checkpoint proteins, is not required for the mitotic block induced by overexpression of the Mpsl protein kinase, which is implicated in mitotic checkpoint control. Furthermore, the delay in mitotic exit caused by non-degradable Pds1, which does not require Mad and Bub proteins, depends on Ndc10 function. We propose that a pathway involving Ndc10 might monitor defects in the mitotic apparatus independently of the Mad and Bub proteins. Since the Espl separase is required for exit from mitosis in both ndc10-1 and nocodazole-treated mad2delta cells, the two signal transduction cascades might ultimately converge on the inactivation of Esp1.     

Knockdown of B-Raf impairs spindle formation and the mitotic checkpoint in human somatic cells

It is well established that B-Raf signaling through the MAP kinase (ERK) pathways plays a prominent role in regulating cell proliferation but how it does this is not completely understood. Here, we show that B-Raf serves a physiological role during mitosis in human somatic cells. Knockdown of B-Raf using short interfering RNA (siRNA) resulted in pleiotropic spindle abnormalities and misaligned chromosomes in over 80% of the mitotic cells analyzed. A second B-Raf siRNA gave similar results suggesting these effects are specific to down-regulating B-Raf protein. In agreement with these findings, a portion of B-Raf was detected at the spindle structures including the spindle poles and kinetochores. Knockdown of C-Raf (Raf-1) had no detectable effects on spindle formation or chromosome alignment. Activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint was found to be dependent on B-Raf as evident by the inability of checkpoint proteins Bub1 and Mad2 to localize to unattached kinetochores in HeLa cells treated with B-Raf siRNA. Consistent with this, live-cell imaging microscopy showed that B-Raf-depleted cells exited mitosis earlier than control non-depleted cells. Finally, we provide evidence that B-Raf signaling promotes phosphorylation and kinetochore localization of the mitotic checkpoint kinase Mps1. Blocking B-Raf expression, ERK activity, or phosphorylation at Ser-821 residue perturbed Mps1 localization at unattached kinetochores. Thus, our data implicates a mitotic role for B-Raf in regulating spindle formation and the spindle checkpoint in human somatic cells.     

Human Mps1 kinase is required for the spindle assembly checkpoint but not for centrosome duplication

Budding yeast Mps1p kinase has been implicated in both the duplication of microtubule-organizing centers and the spindle assembly checkpoint. Here we show that hMps1, the human homolog of yeast Mps1p, is a cell cycle-regulated kinase with maximal activity during M phase. hMps1 localizes to kinetochores and its activity and phosphorylation state increase upon activation of the mitotic checkpoint. By antibody microinjection and siRNA, we demonstrate that hMps1 is required for human cells to undergo checkpoint arrest in response to microtubule depolymerization. In contrast, centrosome (re-)duplication as well as cell division occur in the absence of hMps1. We conclude that hMps1 is required for the spindle assembly checkpoint but not for centrosome duplication.     

The spindle checkpoint of Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to separable microtubule-dependent events

The spindle checkpoint regulates microtubule-based chromosome segregation and helps to maintain genomic stability [1,2]. Mutational inactivation of spindle checkpoint genes has been implicated in the progression of several types of human cancer. Recent evidence from budding yeast suggests that the spindle checkpoint is complex. Order-of-function experiments have defined two separable pathways within the checkpoint. One pathway, defined by MAD2, controls the metaphase-to-anaphase transition and the other, defined by BUB2, controls the exit from mitosis [3-6]. The relationships between the separate branches of the checkpoint, and especially the events that trigger the pathways, have not been defined. We localized a Bub2p-GFP fusion protein to the cytoplasmic side of the spindle pole body and used a kar9 mutant to show that cells with misoriented spindles are arrested in anaphase of mitosis. We used a kar9 bub2 double mutant to show that the arrest is BUB2 dependent. We conclude that the separate pathways of the spindle checkpoint respond to different classes of microtubules. The MAD2 branch of the pathway responds to kinetochore microtubule interactions and the BUB2 branch of the pathway operates within the cytoplasm, responding to spindle misorientation.     

Inhibition of aurora B kinase blocks chromosome segregation,overrides the spindle checkpoint,and perturbs microtubule dynamics in mitosis

How kinetochores correct improper microtubule attachments and regulate the spindle checkpoint signal is unclear. In budding yeast, kinetochores harboring mutations in the mitotic kinase Ipl1 fail to bind chromosomes in a bipolar fashion. In C. elegans and Drosophila, inhibition of the Ipl1 homolog, Aurora B kinase, induces aberrant anaphase and cytokinesis. To study Aurora B kinase in vertebrates, we microinjected mitotic XTC cells with inhibitory antibody and found several related effects. After injection of the antibody, some chromosomes failed to congress to the metaphase plate, consistent with a conserved role for Aurora B in bipolar attachment of chromosomes. Injected cells exited mitosis with no evidence of anaphase or cytokinesis. Injection of anti-Xaurora B antibody also altered the microtubule network in mitotic cells with an extension of the astral microtubules and a reduction of kinetochore microtubules. Finally, inhibition of Aurora B in cultured cells and in cycling Xenopus egg extracts caused escape from the spindle checkpoint arrest induced by microtubule drugs. Our findings implicate Aurora B as a critical coordinator relating changes in microtubule dynamics in mitosis, chromosome movement in prometaphase and anaphase, signaling of the spindle checkpoint, and cytokinesis.     

The maize homologue of the cell cycle checkpoint protein MAD2 reveals kinetochore substructure and contrasting mitotic and meiotic localization patterns

We have identified a maize homologue of yeast MAD2, an essential component in the spindle checkpoint pathway that ensures metaphase is complete before anaphase begins. Combined immunolocalization of MAD2 and a recently cloned maize CENPC homologue indicates that MAD2 localizes to an outer domain of the prometaphase kinetochore. MAD2 staining was primarily observed on mitotic kinetochores that lacked attached microtubules; i.e., at prometaphase or when the microtubules were depolymerized with oryzalin. In contrast, the loss of MAD2 staining in meiosis was not correlated with initial microtubule attachment but was correlated with a measure of tension: the distance between homologous or sister kinetochores (in meiosis I and II, respectively). Further, the tension-sensitive 3F3/2 phosphoepitope colocalized, and was lost concomitantly, with MAD2 staining at the meiotic kinetochore. The mechanism of spindle assembly (discussed here with respect to maize mitosis and meiosis) is likely to affect the relative contributions of attachment and tension. We support the idea that MAD2 is attachment-sensitive and that tension stabilizes microtubule attachments.     

Human CENP-I specifies localization of CENP-F,MAD1 and MAD2 to kinetochores and is essential for mitosis

The kinetochore, a macromolecular complex located at the centromere of chromosomes, provides essential functions for accurate chromosome segregation. Kinetochores contain checkpoint proteins that monitor attachments between the kinetochore and microtubules to ensure that cells do not exit mitosis in the presence of unaligned chromosomes. Here we report that human CENP-I, a constitutive protein of the kinetochore that shares limited similarity with Mis6 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, is required for the localization of CENP-F and the checkpoint proteins MAD1 and MAD2 to kinetochores. Depletion of CENP-I from kinetochores causes the cell cycle to delay in G2. Although monopolar chromosomes in CENP-I-depleted cells fail to establish bipolar connections, the cells are unable to arrest in mitosis. These cells are transiently delayed in mitosis in a MAD2-dependent manner, even though their kinetochores are depleted of MAD2. The delay is extended considerably when the number of unattached kinetochores is increased. This suggests that no single unattached kinetochore in CENP-I-depleted cells can arrest mitosis. The collective output from many unattached kinetochores is required to reach a threshold signal of 'wait for anaphase' to sustain a prolonged mitotic arrest.     

Spindle assembly checkpoint: the third decade

The spindle assembly checkpoint controls cell cycle progression during mitosis, synchronizing it with the attachment of chromosomes to spindle microtubules. After the discovery of the mitotic arrest deficient (MAD) and budding uninhibited by benzymidazole (BUB) genes as crucial checkpoint components in 1991, the second decade of checkpoint studies (2001-2010) witnessed crucial advances in the elucidation of the mechanism through which the checkpoint effector, the mitotic checkpoint complex, targets the anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C) to prevent progression into anaphase. Concomitantly, the discovery that the Ndc80 complex and other components of the microtubule-binding interface of kinetochores are essential for the checkpoint response finally asserted that kinetochores are crucial for the checkpoint response. Nevertheless, the relationship between kinetochores and checkpoint control remains poorly understood. Crucial advances in this area in the third decade of checkpoint studies (2011-2020) are likely to be brought about by the characterization of the mechanism of kinetochore recruitment, activation and inactivation of checkpoint proteins, which remains elusive for the majority of checkpoint components. Here, we take a molecular view on the main challenges hampering this task.     

Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation.

We discovered that many proteins located in the kinetochore outer domain, but not the inner core, are depleted from kinetochores and accumulate at spindle poles when ATP production is suppressed in PtK1 cells, and that microtubule depolymerization inhibits this process. These proteins include the microtubule motors CENP-E and cytoplasmic dynein, and proteins involved with the mitotic spindle checkpoint, Mad2, Bub1R, and the 3F3/2 phosphoantigen. Depletion of these components did not disrupt kinetochore outer domain structure or alter metaphase kinetochore microtubule number. Inhibition of dynein/dynactin activity by microinjection in prometaphase with purified p50 "dynamitin" protein or concentrated 70.1 anti-dynein antibody blocked outer domain protein transport to the spindle poles, prevented Mad2 depletion from kinetochores despite normal kinetochore microtubule numbers, reduced metaphase kinetochore tension by 40%, and induced a mitotic block at metaphase. Dynein/dynactin inhibition did not block chromosome congression to the spindle equator in prometaphase, or segregation to the poles in anaphase when the spindle checkpoint was inactivated by microinjection with Mad2 antibodies. Thus, a major function of dynein/dynactin in mitosis is in a kinetochore disassembly pathway that contributes to inactivation of the spindle checkpoint.     

Bub1 is activated by the protein kinase p90(Rsk) during Xenopus oocyte maturation

BACKGROUND: The kinetochore attachment (spindle assembly) checkpoint arrests cells in metaphase to prevent exit from mitosis until all the chromosomes are aligned properly at the metaphase plate. The checkpoint operates by preventing activation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC), which triggers anaphase by degrading mitotic cyclins and other proteins. This checkpoint is active during normal mitosis and upon experimental disruption of the mitotic spindle. In yeast, the serine/threonine protein kinase Bub1 and the WD-repeat protein Bub3 are elements of a signal transduction cascade that regulates the kinetochore attachment checkpoint. In mammalian cells, activated MAPK is present on kinetochores during mitosis and activity is upregulated by the spindle assembly checkpoint. In vertebrate unfertilized eggs, a special form of meiotic metaphase arrest by cytostatic factor (CSF) is mediated by MAPK activation of the protein kinase p90(Rsk), which leads to inhibition of the APC. However, it is not known whether CSF-dependent metaphase arrest caused by p90(Rsk) involves components of the spindle assembly checkpoint. RESULTS: xBub1 is present in resting oocytes and its protein level increases slightly during oocyte maturation and early embryogenesis. In Xenopus oocytes, Bub1 is localized to kinetochores during both meiosis I and meiosis II, and the electrophoretic mobility of Bub1 upon SDS-PAGE decreases during meiosis I, reflecting phosphorylation and activation of the enzyme. The activation of Bub1 can be induced in interphase egg extracts by selective stimulation of the MAPK pathway by c-Mos, a MAPKKK. In oocytes treated with the MEK1 inhibitor U0126, the MAPK pathway does not become activated, and Bub1 remains in its low-activity, unshifted form. Injection of a constitutively active target of MAPK, the protein kinase p90(Rsk), restores the activation of Bub1 in the presence of U0126. Moreover, purified p90(Rsk) phosphorylates Bub1 in vitro and increases its protein kinase activity. CONCLUSIONS: Bub1, an upstream component of the kinetochore attachment checkpoint, is activated during meiosis in Xenopus in a MAPK-dependent manner. Moreover, a single substrate of MAPK, p90(Rsk), is sufficient to activate Bub1 in vitro and in vivo. These results indicate that in vertebrate eggs, kinetochore attachment/spindle assembly checkpoint proteins, including Bub1, are downstream of p90(Rsk) and may be effectors of APC inhibition and CSF-dependent metaphase arrest by p90(Rsk).     

Cell cycle checkpoints: Arresting progress in mitosis

Cell cycle arrest in M phase can be induced by the failure of a single chromosome to attach properly to the mitotic spindle. The same cell cycle checkpoint mediates M phase arrest when cells are treated with drugs that either disrupt or hyperstabilize spindle microtubules. Study of yeast mutants that fail to arrest in the presence of microtubule disruptors identified a set of genes important in this checkpoint pathway. Two recent papers report the cloning of human and Xenopus homologues of one of these yeast genes, called MAD2 (for mitotic arrest deficient-2)^(1,2). Introduction of antibodies to the MAD2 protein into living mammalian cells or Xenopus egg extracts abrogates the M phase arrest induced by microtubule inhibitors. This and other recent developments suggest a model for the M phase checkpoint in which unattached kinetochores inhibit the ubiquitination of proteins whose proteolysis is necessary for chromatid separation and exit from mitosis.     

Human MPS1 kinase is required for mitotic arrest induced by the loss of CENP-E from kinetochores

We have determined that the previously identified dual-specificity protein kinase TTK is the human orthologue of the yeast MPS1 kinase. Yeast MPS1 (monopolar spindle) is required for spindle pole duplication and the spindle checkpoint. Consistent with the recently identified vertebrate MPS1 homologues, we found that hMPS1 is localized to centrosomes and kinetochores. In addition, hMPS1 is part of a growing list of kinetochore proteins that are localized to nuclear pores. hMPS1 is required by cells to arrest in mitosis in response to spindle defects and kinetochore defects resulting from the loss of the kinesin-like protein, CENP-E. The pattern of kinetochore localization of hMPS1 in CENP-E defective cells suggests that their interaction with the kinetochore is sensitive to microtubule occupancy rather than kinetochore tension. hMPS1 is required for MAD1, MAD2 but not hBUB1, hBUBR1 and hROD to bind to kinetochores. We localized the kinetochore targeting domain in hMPS1 and found that it can abrogate the mitotic checkpoint in a dominant negative manner. Last, hMPS1 was found to associate with the anaphase promoting complex, thus raising the possibility that its checkpoint functions extend beyond the kinetochore.