The role of RNA structure in the interaction of U1A protein with U1 hairpin II RNA

The N-terminal RNA Recognition Motif (RRM1) of the spliceosomal protein U1A interacting with its target U1 hairpin II (U1hpII) has been used as a paradigm for RRM-containing proteins interacting with their RNA targets. U1A binds to U1hpII via direct interactions with a 7-nucleotide (nt) consensus binding sequence at the 5' end of a 10-nt loop, and via hydrogen bonds with the closing C-G base pair at the top of the RNA stem. Using surface plasmon resonance (Biacore), we have examined the role of structural features of U1hpII in binding to U1A RRM1. Mutational analysis of the closing base pair suggests it plays a minor role in binding and mainly prevents "breathing" of the loop. Lengthening the stem and nontarget part of the loop suggests that the increased negative charge of the RNA might slightly aid association. However, this is offset by an increase in dissociation, which may be caused by attraction of the RRM to nontarget parts of the RNA. Studies of a single stranded target and RNAs with untethered loops indicate that structure is not very relevant for association but is important for complex stability. In particular, breaking the link between the stem and the 5' side of the loop greatly increases complex dissociation, presumably by hindering simultaneous contacts between the RRM and stem and loop nucleotides. While binding of U1A to a single stranded target is much weaker than to U1hpII, it occurs with nanomolar affinity, supporting recent evidence that binding of unstructured RNA by U1A has physiological significance.     

Kinetic analysis of the role of the tyrosine 13, phenylalanine 56 and glutamine 54 network in the U1A/U1 hairpin II interaction

The A protein of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle, interacting with its stem–loop RNA target (U1hpII), is frequently used as a paradigm for RNA binding by recognition motif domains (RRMs). U1A/U1hpII complex formation has been proposed to consist of at least two steps: electrostatically mediated alignment of both molecules followed by locking into place, based on the establishment of close-range interactions. The sequence of events between alignment and locking remains obscure. Here we examine the roles of three critical residues, Tyr13, Phe56 and Gln54, in complex formation and stability using Biacore. Our mutational and kinetic data suggest that Tyr13 plays a more important role than Phe56 in complex formation. Mutational analysis of Gln54, combined with molecular dynamics studies, points to Arg52 as another key residue in association. Based on our data and previous structural and modeling studies, we propose that electrostatic alignment of the molecules is followed by hydrogen bond formation between the RNA and Arg52, and the sequential establishment of interactions with loop bases (including Tyr13). A quadruple stack, sandwiching two bases between Phe56 and Asp92, would occur last and coincide with the rearrangement of a C-terminal helix that partially occludes the RRM surface in the free protein.     

Solution structure of the second RNA recognition motif (RRM) domain of murine T cell intracellular antigen-1 (TIA-1) and its RNA recognition mode

T cell intracellular antigen-1 (TIA-1), an apoptosis promoting factor, functions as a splicing regulator for the Fas pre-mRNA. TIA-1 possesses three RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) and a glutamine-rich domain. The second RRM (RRM2) is necessary and sufficient for tight, sequence-specific binding to the uridine-rich sequences buried around the 5' splice sites. In the present study, we solved the solution structure of the murine TIA-1 RRM2 by heteronuclear-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The TIA-1 RRM2 adopts the RRM fold (betaalphabetabetaalphabeta) and possesses an extra beta-strand between beta2 and beta3, which forms an additional beta-sheet with the C-terminal part of beta2. We refer to this structure as the beta2-beta2' beta-loop. Interestingly, this characteristic beta-loop structure is conserved among a number of RRMs, including the U2AF65 RRM2 and the Sex-lethal RRM1 and RRM2, which also bind to uridine-rich RNAs. Furthermore, we identified a new sequence motif in the beta2-beta2' beta-loop, the DxxT motif. Chemical shift perturbation analyses of both the main and side chains upon binding to the uridine pentamer RNA revealed that most of the beta-sheet surface, including the beta2-beta2' beta-loop, is involved in the RNA binding. An investigation of the chemical shift perturbation revealed similarity in the RNA recognition modes between the TIA-1 and U2AF65 RRMs.     

Identification of molecular contacts between the U1 A small nuclear ribonucleoprotein and U1 RNA.

We recently determined the crystal structure of the RNP domain of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein A and identified Arg and Lys residues involved in U1 RNA binding. These residues are clustered around the two highly conserved segments, RNP1 and RNP2, located in the central two beta strands. We have now studied the U1 RNA binding of mutants where potentially hydrogen bonding residues on the RNA binding surface were replaced by non-hydrogen bonding residues. In the RNP2 segment, the Thr11----Val and Asn15----Val mutations completely abolished, and the Tyr13----Phe and Asn16----Val mutations substantially reduced the U1 RNA binding, suggesting that these residues form hydrogen bonds with the RNA. In the RNP1 segment Arg52----Gln abolished, but Arg52----Lys only slightly affected U1 RNA binding, suggesting that Arg52 may form a salt bridge with phosphates of U1 RNA. Ethylation protection experiments of U1 RNA show that the backbone phosphates of the 3' two-thirds of loop II and the 5' stem are in contact with the U1 A protein. The U1 A protein-U1 RNA binding constant is substantially reduced by A----G and G----A replacements in loop II, but not by C----U or U----C replacements. Based on these biochemical data we propose a structure for the complex between the U1 A ribonucleoprotein and U1 RNA.     

The role of the C-terminal helix of U1A protein in the interaction with U1hpII RNA

Previous kinetic investigations of the N-terminal RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) domain of spliceosomal A protein of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (U1A) interacting with its RNA target U1 hairpin II (U1hpII) provided experimental evidence for a ‘lure and lock’ model of binding. The final step of locking has been proposed to involve conformational changes in an α-helix immediately C-terminal to the RRM domain (helix C), which occludes the RNA binding surface in the unbound protein. Helix C must shift its position to accommodate RNA binding in the RNA–protein complex. This results in a new hydrophobic core, an intraprotein hydrogen bond and a quadruple stacking interaction between U1A and U1hpII. Here, we used a surface plasmon resonance-based biosensor to gain mechanistic insight into the role of helix C in mediating the interaction with U1hpII. Truncation, removal or disruption of the helix exposes the RNA-binding surface, resulting in an increase in the association rate, while simultaneously reducing the ability of the complex to lock, reflected in a loss of complex stability. Disruption of the quadruple stacking interaction has minor kinetic effects when compared with removal of the intraprotein hydrogen bonds. These data provide new insights into the mechanism whereby sequences C-terminal to an RRM can influence RNA binding.     

Identification of antisense RNA stem–loops that inhibit RNA–protein interactions using a bacterial reporter system

Many well-characterized examples of antisense RNAs from prokaryotic systems involve hybridization of the looped regions of stem–loop RNAs, presumably due to the high thermodynamic stability of the resulting loop–loop and loop–linear interactions. In this study, the identification of RNA stem–loops that inhibit U1A protein binding to the hpII RNA through RNA–RNA interactions was attempted using a bacterial reporter system based on phage λ N-mediated antitermination. As a result, loop sequences possessing 7–8 base complementarity to the 5′ region of the boxA element important for functional antitermination complex formation, but not the U1 hpII loop, were identified. In vitro and in vivo mutational analysis strongly suggested that the selected loop sequences were binding to the boxA region, and that the structure of the antisense stem–loop was important for optimal inhibitory activity. Next, in an attempt to demonstrate the ability to inhibit the interaction between the U1A protein and the hpII RNA, the rational design of an RNA stem–loop that inhibits U1A-binding to a modified hpII was carried out. Moderate inhibitory activity was observed, showing that it is possible to design and select antisense RNA stem–loops that disrupt various types of RNA–protein interactions.     

Alternative conformations at the RNA-binding surface of the N-terminal U2AF(65) RNA recognition motif

The essential pre-mRNA splicing factor, U2 auxiliary factor 65KD (U2AF(65)) recognizes the polypyrimidine tract (Py-tract) consensus sequence of the pre-mRNA using two RNA recognition motifs (RRMs), the most prevalent class of eukaryotic RNA-binding domain. The Py-tracts of higher eukaryotic pre-mRNAs are often interrupted with purines, yet U2AF(65) must identify these degenerate Py-tracts for accurate pre-mRNA splicing. Previously, the structure of a U2AF(65) variant in complex with poly(U) RNA suggested that rearrangement of flexible side-chains or bound water molecules may contribute to degenerate Py-tract recognition by U2AF(65). Here, the X-ray structure of the N-terminal RRM domain of U2AF(65) (RRM1) is described at 1.47 A resolution in the absence of RNA. Notably, RNA-binding by U2AF(65) selectively stabilizes pre-existing alternative conformations of three side-chains located at the RNA interface (Arg150, Lys225, and Arg227). Additionally, a flexible loop connecting the beta2/beta3 strands undergoes a conformational change to interact with the RNA. These pre-existing alternative conformations may contribute to the ability of U2AF(65) to recognize a variety of Py-tract sequences. This rare, high-resolution view of an important member of the RRM class of RNA-binding domains highlights the role of alternative side-chain conformations in RNA recognition.     

The role of positively charged amino acids and electrostatic interactions in the complex of U1A protein and U1 hairpin II RNA

Previous kinetic investigations of the N-terminal RNA recognition motif (RRM) domain of spliceosomal protein U1A, interacting with its RNA target U1 hairpin II, provided experimental evidence for a ‘lure and lock’ model of binding in which electrostatic interactions first guide the RNA to the protein, and close range interactions then lock the two molecules together. To further investigate the ‘lure’ step, here we examined the electrostatic roles of two sets of positively charged amino acids in U1A that do not make hydrogen bonds to the RNA: Lys20, Lys22 and Lys23 close to the RNA-binding site, and Arg7, Lys60 and Arg70, located on ‘top’ of the RRM domain, away from the RNA. Surface plasmon resonance-based kinetic studies, supplemented with salt dependence experiments and molecular dynamics simulation, indicate that Lys20 predominantly plays a role in association, while nearby residues Lys22 and Lys23 appear to be at least as important for complex stability. In contrast, kinetic analyses of residues away from the RNA indicate that they have a minimal effect on association and stability. Thus, well-positioned positively charged residues can be important for both initial complex formation and complex maintenance, illustrating the multiple roles of electrostatic interactions in protein–RNA complexes.     

On the interaction of ribosomal protein L5 with 5S rRNA

Ribosomal protein L5, a 5S rRNA binding protein in the large subunit, is composed of a five-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet and four alpha-helices, and folds in a way that is topologically similar to the ribonucleprotein (RNP) domain [Nakashima et al., RNA 7, 692-701, 20011. The crystal structure of ribosomal protein L5 (BstL5) from Bacillus stearothermophilus suggests that a concave surface formed by an anti-parallel beta-sheet and long loop structures are strongly involved in 5S rRNA binding. To identify amino acid residues responsible for 5S rRNA binding, we made use of Ala-scanning mutagenesis of evolutionarily conserved amino acids occurred at beta-strands and loop structures in BstL5. The mutation of Lys33 at the beta 1-strand caused a significant reduction in 5S rRNA binding. In addition, the Arg92, Phe122, and Glu134 mutations on the beta2-strand, the alpha3-beta4 loop, and the beta4-beta5 loop, respectively, resulted in a moderate decrease in the 5S rRNA binding affinity. In contrast, mutation of the conserved residue Pro65 at the beta2-strand had little effect on the 5S rRNA binding activity. These results, taken together with previous results, identified Lys33, Asn37, Gln63, and Thr90 on the beta-sheet structure, and Phe77 at the beta2-beta3 loop as critical residues for the 5S rRNA binding. The contribution of these amino acids to 5S rRNA binding was further quantitatively evaluated by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis by the use of BIAcore. The results showed that the amino acids on the beta-sheet structure are required to decrease the dissociation rate constant for the BstL5-5S rRNA complex, while those on the loops are to increase the association rate constant for the BstL5-5S rRNA interaction.     

A Compare-and-Contrast NMR Dynamics Study of Two Related RRMs: U1A and SNF

The U1A/U2B″/SNF family of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins uses a phylogenetically conserved RNA recognition motif (RRM1) to bind RNA stemloops in U1 and/or U2 small nuclear RNA (snRNA). RRMs are characterized by their α/β sandwich topology, and these RRMs use their β-sheet as the RNA binding surface. Unique to this RRM family is the tyrosine-glutamine-phenylalanine (YQF) triad of solvent-exposed residues that are displayed on the β-sheet surface; the aromatic residues form a platform for RNA nucleobases to stack. U1A, U2B″, and SNF have very different patterns of RNA binding affinity and specificity, however, so here we ask how YQF in Drosophila SNF RRM1 contributes to RNA binding, as well as to domain stability and dynamics. Thermodynamic double-mutant cycles using tyrosine and phenylalanine substitutions probe the communication between those two residues in the free and bound states of the RRM. NMR experiments follow corresponding changes in the glutamine side-chain amide in both U1A and SNF, providing a physical picture of the RRM1 β-sheet surface. NMR relaxation and dispersion experiments compare fast (picosecond to nanosecond) and intermediate (microsecond-to-millisecond) dynamics of U1A and SNF RRM1. We conclude that there is a network of amino acid interactions involving Tyr-Gln-Phe in both SNF and U1A RRM1, but whereas mutations of the Tyr-Gln-Phe triad result in small local responses in U1A, they produce extensive microsecond-to-millisecond global motions throughout SNF that alter the conformational states of the RRM.     

Contribution of the C-terminal tail of U1A RBD1 to RNA recognition and protein stability.

The N-terminal RNA binding domain (RBD1) of the human U1A protein interacts specifically with a short RNA hairpin containing the U1 snRNA stem/loop II sequence. Previous RNA binding studies have suggested that the C-terminal tail of RBD1 contributes to RNA recognition in addition to interactions on the beta-sheet surface of the protein. To evaluate the contributions of these C-terminal residues in RBD1 to RNA binding affinity and specificity, as well as to study the thermodynamic stability of RBDs, a number of RBD1 mutants with truncated tails, with single amino acid substitutions, and with both a truncation and an amino acid substitution, have been constructed. The thermodynamic stabilities of these mutants have been measured and compared by GdnHCI unfolding experiments. The RNA binding affinity and specificity of these mutant proteins have been assessed by measuring the binding of each protein to the wild-type RNA hairpin and to selected RNA mutants with nucleotide substitutions in the RNA loop. The results demonstrate first that, although the C-terminal tail of RBD1 makes significant contributions to RNA binding affinity, it is not required for RNA binding, and second, its contributions to binding specificity are mediated only through selected nucleotides in the RNA loop, for in the absence of the tail, the protein continues to use other nucleotides to discriminate among RNAs. In these truncated proteins, the secondary structure intrinsic to the C-terminal tail is absent, yet their affinity and discrimination for RNAs are not lost. Thus, a structured tail is not required for RNA recognition.     

Altering the RNA-binding mode of the U1A RBD1 protein

The N-terminal RNA-binding domain (RBD1) of the human U1A protein is evolutionarily designed to bind its RNA targets with great affinity and specificity. The physical mechanisms that modulate the coupling (local cooperativity) among amino acid residues on the extensive binding surface of RBD1 are investigated here, using mutants that replace a highly conserved glycine residue. This glycine residue, at the strand/loop junction of beta3/loop3, is found in U1A RBD1, and in most RBD domains, suggesting it has a specific role in modulation of RNA binding. Here, two RBD1 proteins are constructed in which that residue (Gly53) is replaced by either alanine or valine. These new proteins are shown by NMR methods and molecular dynamics simulations to be very similar to the wild-type RBD1, both in structure and in their backbone dynamics. However, RNA-binding assays show that affinity for the U1 snRNA stem-loop II RNA target is reduced by nearly 200-fold for the RBD1-G53A protein, and by 1.6 x 10(4)-fold for RBD1-G53V. The mode of RNA binding by RBD1-G53A is similar to that of RBD1-WT, displaying its characteristic non-additive free energies of base recognition and its salt-dependence. The binding mode of RBD1-G53V is altered, having lost its salt-dependence and displaying site-independence of base recognition. The molecular basis for this alteration in RNA-binding properties is proposed to result from the inability of the RNA to induce a change in the structure of the free protein to produce a high-affinity complex.     

The crystal structure of human isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase at 1.7 A resolution reveals its catalytic mechanism in isoprenoid biosynthesis

The essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae pre-messenger RNA splicing protein 24 (Prp24) has four RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) and facilitates U6 RNA base-pairing with U4 RNA during spliceosome assembly. Prp24 is a component of the free U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP) but not the U4/U6 bi-snRNP, and so is thought to be displaced from U6 by U4/U6 base-pairing. The interaction partners of each of the four RRMs of Prp24 and how these interactions direct U4/U6 pairing are not known. Here we report the crystal structure of the first three RRMs and the solution structure of the first two RRMs of Prp24. Strikingly, RRM 2 forms extensive inter-domain contacts with RRMs 1 and 3. These contacts occupy much of the canonical RNA-binding faces (beta-sheets) of RRMs 1 and 2, but leave the beta-sheet of RRM 3 exposed. Previously identified substitutions in Prp24 that suppress mutations in U4 and U6 spliceosomal RNAs cluster primarily in the beta-sheet of RRM 3, but also in a conserved loop of RRM 2. RNA binding assays and chemical shift mapping indicate that a large basic patch evident on the surface of RRMs 1 and 2 is part of a high affinity U6 RNA binding site. Our results suggest that Prp24 binds free U6 RNA primarily with RRMs 1 and 2, which may remodel the U6 secondary structure. The beta-sheet of RRM 3 then influences U4/U6 pairing through interaction with an unidentified ligand.     

Solution Structure of the N-terminal RNP Domain of U1A Protein: The Role of C-terminal Residues in Structure Stability and RNA Binding

The solution structure of a fragment of the human U1A spliceosomal protein containing residues 2 to 117 (U1A117) determined using multi-dimensional heteronuclear NMR is presented. The C-terminal region of the molecule is considerably more ordered in the free protein than thought previously and its conformation is different from that seen in the crystal structure of the complex with U1 RNA hairpin II. The residues between Asp90 and Lys98 form an α-helix that lies across the β-sheet, with residues Ile93, Ile94 and Met97 making contacts with Leu44, Phe56 and Ile58. This interaction prevents solvent exposure of hydrophobic residues on the surface of the β-sheet, thereby stabilising the protein. Upon RNA binding, helix C moves away from this position, changing its orientation by 135° to allow Tyr13, Phe56 and Gln54 to stack with bases of the RNA, and also allowing Leu44 to contact the RNA. The new position of helix C in the complex with RNA is stabilised by hydrophobic interactions from Ile93 and Ile94 to Ile58, Leu 41, Val62 and His10, as well as a hydrogen bond between Ser91 and Thr11. The movement of helix C mainly involves changes in the main-chain torsion angles of Thr89, Asp90 and Ser91, the helix thereby acting as a "lid" over the RNA binding surface.     

A Compare-and-Contrast NMR Dynamics Study of Two Related RRMs: U1A and SNF

The U1A/U2B″/SNF family of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins uses a phylogenetically conserved RNA recognition motif (RRM1) to bind RNA stemloops in U1 and/or U2 small nuclear RNA (snRNA). RRMs are characterized by their α/β sandwich topology, and these RRMs use their β-sheet as the RNA binding surface. Unique to this RRM family is the tyrosine-glutamine-phenylalanine (YQF) triad of solvent-exposed residues that are displayed on the β-sheet surface; the aromatic residues form a platform for RNA nucleobases to stack. U1A, U2B″, and SNF have very different patterns of RNA binding affinity and specificity, however, so here we ask how YQF in Drosophila SNF RRM1 contributes to RNA binding, as well as to domain stability and dynamics. Thermodynamic double-mutant cycles using tyrosine and phenylalanine substitutions probe the communication between those two residues in the free and bound states of the RRM. NMR experiments follow corresponding changes in the glutamine side-chain amide in both U1A and SNF, providing a physical picture of the RRM1 β-sheet surface. NMR relaxation and dispersion experiments compare fast (picosecond to nanosecond) and intermediate (microsecond-to-millisecond) dynamics of U1A and SNF RRM1. We conclude that there is a network of amino acid interactions involving Tyr-Gln-Phe in both SNF and U1A RRM1, but whereas mutations of the Tyr-Gln-Phe triad result in small local responses in U1A, they produce extensive microsecond-to-millisecond global motions throughout SNF that alter the conformational states of the RRM.     

Correlated motions in the U1 snRNA stem/loop 2:U1A RBD1 complex

The complex formed by U1A RBD1 and the U1 snRNA stem/loop II is noted for its high affinity and exquisite specificity. Here, that complex is investigated by 5 ns molecular dynamics simulations and analyzed by reorientational eigenmode dynamics to determine the dynamic properties of the RNA:protein interface that could contribute to the binding mechanism. The analysis shows that there is extensive correlation between motions of the RNA and protein, involving 7 of the 10 RNA loop nucleotides, the protein beta-sheet surface, two of its loops, and its C-terminal tripeptide sequence. Order parameters of these regions of the complex are uniformly high, indicating restricted motion. However, several regions of both RNA and protein retain local flexibility, notably three nucleotides of the RNA loop and one loop of RBD1 that does not contact RNA. The highly correlated motions involving both molecules reflect the intricate network of interactions that characterize this complex and could account in part for the thermodynamic coupling observed for complex formation.     

Complex assembly mechanism and an RNA-binding mode of the human p14-SF3b155 spliceosomal protein complex identified by NMR solution structure and functional analyses

The spliceosomal protein p14, a component of the SF3b complex in the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP), is essential for the U2 snRNP to recognize the branch site adenosine. The elucidation of the dynamic process of the splicing machinery rearrangement awaited the solution structural information. We identified a suitable complex of human p14 and the SF3b155 fragment for the determination of its solution structure by NMR. In addition to the overall structure of the complex, which was recently reported in a crystallographic study (typical RNA recognition motif fold beta1-alpha1-beta2-beta3-alpha2-beta4 of p14, and alphaA-betaA fold of the SF3b155 fragment), we identified three important features revealed by the NMR solution structure. First, the C-terminal extension and the nuclear localization signal of p14 (alpha3 and alpha4 in the crystal structure, respectively) were dispensable for the complex formation. Second, the proline-rich segment of SF3b155, following betaA, closely approaches p14. Third, interestingly, the beta1-alpha1 loop and the alpha2-beta4 beta-hairpin form a positively charged groove. Extensive mutagenesis analyses revealed the functional relevance of the residues involved in the protein-protein interactions: two aromatic residues of SF3b155 (Phe408 and Tyr412) play crucial roles in the complex formation, and two hydrophobic residues (Val414 and Leu415) in SF3b 155 serve as an anchor for the complex formation, by cooperating with the aromatic residues. These findings clearly led to the conclusion that SFb155 binds to p14 with three contact points, involving Phe408, Tyr412, and Val414/Leu415. Furthermore, to dissect the interactions between p14 and the branch site RNA, we performed chemical-shift-perturbation experiments, not only for the main-chain but also for the side-chain resonances, for several p14-SF3b155 complex constructs upon binding to RNA. These analyses identified a positively charged groove and the C-terminal extension of p14 as RNA-binding sites. Strikingly, an aromatic residue in the beta1-alpha1 loop, Tyr28, and a positively charged residue in the alpha2-beta4 beta-hairpin, Agr85, are critical for the RNA-binding activity of the positively charged groove. The Tyr28Ala and Arg85Ala point mutants and a deletion mutant of the C-terminal extension clearly revealed that their RNA binding activities were independent of each other. Collectively, this study provides details for the protein-recognition mode of p14 and insight into the branch site recognition.     

Sex lethal and U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein auxiliary factor (U2AF65) recognize polypyrimidine tracts using multiple modes of binding

The molecular basis for specific recognition of simple homopolymeric sequences like the polypyrimidine tract (Py tract) by multiple RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) is not well understood. The Drosophila splicing repressor Sex lethal (SXL), which has two RRMs, can directly compete with the essential splicing factor U2AF(65), which has three RRMs, for binding to specific Py tracts. We have combined site-specific photocross-linking and chemical cleavage of the proteins to biochemically map cross-linking of each of the uracils within the Py tract to specific RRMs. For both proteins, RRM1 and RRM2 together constitute the minimal Py-tract recognition domain. The RRM3 of U2AF(65) shows no cross-linking to the Py tract. Both RRM1 and RRM2 of U2AF(65) and SXL can be cross-linked to certain residues, with RRM2 showing a surprisingly high number of residues cross-linked. The cross-linking data eliminate the possibility that shorter Py tracts are bound by fewer RRMs. We present a model to explain how the binding affinity can nonetheless change as a function of the length of the Py tract. The results indicate that multiple modes of binding result in an ensemble of RNA-protein complexes, which could allow tuning of the binding affinity without changing sequence specificity.