Early innervation of the metanephric kidney

During kidney differentiation, the nephrogenic mesenchyme converts into renal tubules and the ureter bud branches to form the collecting system. Here we show that in the early undifferentiated kidney rudiment there is a third cell type present. In whole-mount preparations of cultured undifferentiated metanephric kidneys, neurones can be detected by immunohistochemical means with antibodies against the neurofilament triplet, 13AA8, and against neuronal cell surface gangliosides, Q211. Clusters of neuronal cell bodies can be seen in the mesenchyme close to the ureter bud. The terminal endings of neurites are found around the mesenchymal condensates that later become kidney tubules. A similar distribution of neurites can be revealed in tissue sections of kidney grafts growing in the chicken chorioallantoic membranes. In primary cultures of the ureter bud cells, neurones are constantly present. In another report, we have shown that, in experimental conditions, neurones are involved in regulation of kidney morphogenesis. The present results raise the possibility that neurones of the metanephric kidney may have this function in vivo as well.     

Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions regulate the stage-specific expression of a cell surface proteoglycan, syndecan, in the developing kidney

Morphogenesis of the kidney is regulated by reciprocal tissue interactions between the epithelial ureter bud and the metanephric mesenchyme. The differentiation of the kidney involves profound changes in the extracellular matrix, and therefore matrix receptors may have an important role in this process. We studied the expression of syndecan, a cell surface proteoglycan acting as a receptor for interstitial matrix materials, by using a monoclonal antibody against the core protein of the molecule. Syndecan was not detected in the uninduced metanephric mesenchyme. During the formation of the ureter bud from the Wolffian duct, syndecan appeared in the mesenchymal cells around the invaginating bud. Simultaneously with the first branching of the ureter bud, the whole nephric mesenchyme became syndecan positive, but a 3- to 10-cell-thick layer around the branching ureter bud, representing the presumptive tubular cells, was most intensely stained. During the assembly of the mesenchyme cells into pretubular aggregates, syndecan was detected in these aggregates and, to a lesser degree, in the morphologically undifferentiated mesenchyme. Thereafter syndecan was found only in the differentiating epithelium, from which it was gradually lost during maturation of the nephron. It was last detected in the periphery of the kidney, where tubulogenesis still continued. In transfilter cultures we showed that syndecan appeared in the nephric mesenchyme during the period when the mesenchyme becomes programmed to transform into epithelial structures. By using interspecies recombinations and a species-specific antibody we excluded the possibility that syndecan in the mesenchyme would originate from the inductor. We conclude that syndecan expression is regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. The findings that syndecan appeared as an early response to induction and that its distribution showed both spatial and temporal correlation with kidney morphogenesis suggest an important role for this molecule in development.     

Shift in collagen type as an early response to induction of the metanephric mesenchyme

Conversion of the nephrogenic mesenchyme into epithelial tubules requires an inductive stimulus from the ureter bud. Here we show with immunofluorescence techniques that the undifferentiated mesenchyme before induction expresses uniformly type I and type III collagens. Induction both in vivo and in vitro leads to a loss of these proteins and to the appearance of basement membrane components including type IV collagen. This change correlates both spatially and temporally with the determination of the mesenchyme and precedes and morphological events. During morphogenesis, type IV collagen concentrates at the borders of the developing tubular structures where, by electron microscopy, a thin, often discontinuous basal lamina was seen to cover the first pretubular cell aggregates. Subsequently, the differentiating tubules were surrounded by a well-developed basal lamina. No loss of the interstitial collagens was seen in the metanephric mesenchyme when brought into contact with noninducing tissues or when cultured alone. Similar observations were made with nonnephrogenic mesenchyme (salivary, lung) when exposed to various heterotypic tissues known to induce tubules in the nephrogenic mesenchyme. The sequential shift in the composition of the extracellular matrix from an interstitial, mesenchymal type to a differentiated, epithelial type is so far the first detectable response of the nephrogenic mesenchyme to the tubule- inducing signal.     

Differential expression of the laminin A and B chains in chimeric kidneys

The expression of laminin in embryonic kidneys growing in ovo is followed with mouse-specific, affinity-purified antibodies against the laminin A and B chains. In mouse kidneys growing on the chicken chorioallantoic membrane, the epithelium and nephrogenic mesenchyme are derived from mouse and the vasculature from chicken chorioallantoic vessels. Hence, with the mouse-specific antibodies, it is possible to analyze the deposition of laminin chains by the nephrogenic tissue, because laminin derived from the chicken vasculature remains unstained. In these chimeras, only the laminin B chain, but not the A chain, is expressed in the undifferentiated nephrogenic mesenchyme. The basement membrane around the ureter bud is labeled by the antibodies against both laminin A and B chains. In the mesenchyme, the laminin A chain appears when the mesenchyme converts into tubules. The results suggest that the laminin A and B chains are synthesized differentially in the embryonic nephrogenic tissue.     

SLIT2-mediated ROBO2 signaling restricts kidney induction to a single site

Kidney development occurs in a stereotypic position along the body axis. It begins when a single ureteric bud emerges from the nephric duct in response to GDNF secreted by the adjacent nephrogenic mesenchyme. Posterior restriction of Gdnf expression is considered critical for correct positioning of ureteric bud development. Here we show that mouse mutants lacking either SLIT2 or its receptor ROBO2, molecules known primarily for their function in axon guidance and cell migration, develop supernumerary ureteric buds that remain inappropriately connected to the nephric duct, and that the SLIT2/ROBO2 signal is transduced in the nephrogenic mesenchyme. Furthermore, we show that Gdnf expression is inappropriately maintained in anterior nephrogenic mesenchyme in these mutants. Thus our data identify an intercellular signaling system that restricts, directly or indirectly, the extent of the Gdnf expression domain, thereby precisely positioning the site of kidney induction.     

Regulation of ureteric bud outgrowth by Pax2-dependent activation of the glial derived neurotrophic factor gene.

The outgrowth of the ureteric bud from the posterior nephric duct epithelium and the subsequent invasion of the bud into the metanephric mesenchyme initiate the process of metanephric, or adult kidney, development. The receptor tyrosine kinase RET and glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) form a signaling complex that is essential for ureteric bud growth and branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud epithelium. We demonstrate that Pax2 expression in the metanephric mesenchyme is independent of induction by the ureteric bud. Pax2 mutants are deficient in ureteric bud outgrowth and do not express GDNF in the uninduced metanephric mesenchyme. Furthermore, Pax2 mutant mesenchyme is unresponsive to induction by wild-type heterologous inducers. In normal embryos, GDNF is sufficient to induce ectopic ureter buds in the posterior nephric duct, a process inhibited by bone morphogenetic protein 4. However, GDNF replacement in organ culture is not sufficient to stimulate ureteric bud outgrowth from Pax2 mutant nephric ducts, indicating additional defects in the nephric duct epithelium of Pax2 mutants. Pax2 can activate expression of GDNF in cell lines derived from embryonic metanephroi. Furthermore, Pax2 protein can bind to upstream regulatory elements within the GDNF promoter region and can transactivate expression of reporter genes. Thus, activation of GDNF by Pax2 coordinates the position and outgrowth of the ureteric bud such that kidney development can begin.     

Role of BMP family members during kidney development.

Members of the Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) family have been shown to be important signaling molecules throughout mouse development. Accordingly, many BMPs are also expressed during organogenesis of the metanephric kidney. However, only BMP7 has been shown to be absolutely required for proper formation of the kidney, thus the majority of information known involves this family member. BMP7 is expressed in both the ureteric epithelium and the mesenchyme throughout embryonic development and has been shown to function as a survival factor for the nephrogenic mesenchyme. However, there has been some controversy over the role of BMP7 as an inducing molecule for the metanephric mesenchyme. Recent studies have shown that BMP7 functions as an anti-differentiation factor for this mesenchyme cell population. The function of BMPs in the ureter and in the more differentiated epithelial structures of the nephron is less well understood.     

Effects of extracellular matrix components on the differentiation of chick embryo tail bud mesenchyme in culture

The mesenchymal cells of the chick tail bud comprise the remains of Hensen's node and the primitive streak after gastrulation. This mass of cells, situated at the caudal limit of the chick embryo, is morphologically homogeneous but pluripotent, with the ability to differentiate into a variety of tissues that are both ectoderm- and mesoderm-derived elsewhere in the embryo. These tissues include neuroectoderm, neurons, myoblasts and chondrocytes. As the factors regulating the differentiation of tail bud mesenchyme into so many cell types are unclear, and because the extracellular matrix (ECM) is known to have a profound effect on cellular differentiation in many embryonic systems, we studied the differentiation of tail bud mesenchyme explanted onto a variety of different ECM components as substrata. We report that the histogenetic potential of isolated tail buds in culture compares favourably with that in situ. Using various antibody markers, we have demonstrated that tail bud mesenchyme cultured upon different ECM components as substrata is able to differentiate into neurons, neuroepithelium, melanocytes, muscle and cartilage. Laminin and laminin-containing substrata (Matrigel) were found to promote the differentiation of neural crest derivatives (neurons and melanocytes) and neuroepithelial cells; type I collagen promoted both myogenesis and chondrogenesis; while type IV collagen promoted myogenesis only. We have therefore demonstrated that differentiation of tail bud mesenchyme in vitro is substratum-dependent.     

TGFbeta superfamily signals are required for morphogenesis of the kidney mesenchyme progenitor population

The TGFbeta superfamily plays diverse and essential roles in kidney development. Gdf11 and Bmp4 are essential for outgrowth and positioning of the ureteric bud, the inducer of metanephric mesenchyme. During nephrogenesis, Bmp7 is required for renewal of the mesenchyme progenitor population. Additionally, in vitro studies demonstrate inhibitory effects of BMPs and TGFbetas on collecting duct branching and growth. Here, we explore the predicted models of TGFbeta superfamily function by cell-specific inactivation of Smad4, a key mediator of TGFbeta signaling. Using a HoxB7cre transgene expressed in ureteric bud and collecting duct, we find that development of the collecting duct is Smad4 independent. By contrast, removal of Smad4 in nephrogenic mesenchyme using the Bmp7(cre/+) allele leads to disorganization of the nephrogenic mesenchyme and impairment of mesenchyme induction. Smad4-deficient metanephric mesenchyme does not display defects in inducibility in LiCl or spinal cord induction assays. However, in situ hybridization and lineage analysis of Smad4 null mesenchyme cells at E11.5 show that the nephrogenic mesenchyme does not aggregate tightly around the ureteric bud tips, but remains loosely associated, embedded within a population of cells expressing markers of both nephrogenic mesenchyme and peripheral stroma. We conclude that the failure of recruitment of nephrogenic mesenchyme leaves a primitive population of mesenchyme at the periphery of the kidney. This population is gradually depleted, and by E16.5 the periphery is composed of cells of stromal phenotype. This study uncovers a novel role for TGFbeta superfamily signaling in the recruitment and/or organization of the nephrogenic mesenchyme at early time-points of kidney development. Additionally, we present conclusive genetic lineage mapping of the collecting duct and nephrogenic mesenchyme.     

Tailbud-derived mesenchyme promotes urinary tract segmentation via BMP4 signaling

Urinary tract morphogenesis requires the sub-division of the ureteric bud (UB) into the intra-renal collecting system and ureter, two tissues with unique structural and functional properties. In this report we investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms that mediate their differentiation. Fate mapping experiments in the developing chick indicate that the UB is surrounded by two distinct mesenchymal populations: nephrogenic mesenchyme derived from the intermediate mesoderm and tailbud-derived mesoderm, which is selectively associated with the domain of the UB that differentiates into the ureter. Functional experiments utilizing murine metanephric kidney explants show that BMP4, a paracrine factor secreted by tailbud-derived mesenchyme, is required for ureter morphogenesis. Conversely, ectopic BMP4 signaling is sufficient to induce ureter morphogenesis in domains of the UB normally fated to differentiate into the intra-renal collecting system. Collectively, these results indicate that the border between the kidney and ureter forms where mesenchymal tissues originating in two different areas of the early embryo meet. These data raise the possibility that the susceptibility of this junction to congenital defects in humans, such as ureteral-pelvic obstructions, may be related to the complex morphogenetic movements that are required to integrate cells from these different lineages into a single functional structure.     

In vitro analysis of sympathetic neuron differentiation from chick neural crest cells

Sympathetic neuron differentiation was studied using a fluorescence histochemical assay to detect the appearance of cell-bound catecholamines. Results from in vitro organ cultures indicate that chick neural crest cells must interact with both ventral neural tube (defined throughout as the ventral neural tube plus the notochord) and somitic mesenchyme in order to differentiate into sympathoblasts. Somite, ventral neural tube, and crest were cultured transfilter in various combinations to define these tissue interactions more precisely. Results from these experiments indicate that neural crest cells must be contiguous to somite in order to differentiate into sympathoblasts, but ventral neural tube may act across a Millipore filter membrane (type TH, 25 μm thick) either on somite, crest, or both. To distinguish among these possibilities, somite was cultured transfilter to ventral tube for a short period, after which ventral tube was removed and fresh crest was added to the somite. The results from this and other experiments support the hypothesis that the ventral tube does not act directly on crest cells, but elicits a developmental change in somitic mesenchyme, which then promotes sympathoblast differentiation. To study the relationship of nerve growth factor (NGF) to the differentiation of sympathetic neurons, cultures of somite + crest were temporarily exposed transfilter to ventral tube, in the presence or the absence of exogenous NGF. The results of these and other experiments are consistent with the hypothesis that the continued presence of ventral tube is required to ensure the survival of the differentiating sympathetic neurons. With respect to this second function, ventral tube can be replaced by exogenous NGF.     

Control of kidney differentiation by soluble factors secreted by the embryonic liver and the yolk sac

Since transferrin is necessary for the differentiation of the embryonic kidney in organ culture, we have suggested that the component is a growth factor for in vivo development as well. In the present study we demonstrate that transferrin is present in the serum of 11-day-old mouse embryos, at the time when kidney differentiation starts. We have also tested whether various embryonic tissues can replace transferrin as stimulators of the differentiation and proliferation of the metanephric mesenchyme. We used a transfilter model system where nephrogenic mesenchymes are cultured with spinal cord, a known inductor of kidney tubules. The embryonic liver could not replace the spinal cord as an inducer of tubular differentiation. However, when the kidney mesenchymes were cultured together with both the spinal cord and the liver, the mesenchymes proliferated and differentiated also in the absence of exogenous transferrin. In such cocultures the spinal cord had to be in close contact with the mesenchyme while the embryonic liver could be located several cell layers apart. The liver-mediated stimulation of proliferation of the induced mesenchyme could be inhibited by anti-transferrin antibodies. Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting with these antibodies of the liver-conditioned medium demonstrated that the 11-day mouse liver produces transferrin. Other potential mitogens produced by liver cells, alpha-fetoprotein, or multiplication stimulating activity, did not in any way stimulate the proliferation of induced mesenchymes. These studies suggest that the mitogen in the liver medium is transferrin. This is supported by data which show that another embryonic transferring producer, the visceral yolk sac, can replace the effect of the liver, whereas a tissue not producing transferrin, the salivary mesenchyme, cannot. In conclusion, an essential function of the inducer is to make the mesenchyme responsive to transferrin. The liver and the yolk sac stimulate early kidney differentiation by producing the soluble factor, transferrin, but they are ineffective as inductors of the transferrin responsiveness.     

Midkine Promotes Selective Expansion of the Nephrogenic Mesenchyme during Kidney Organogenesis

During kidney development, the growth and development of the stromal and nephrogenic mesenchyme cell populations and the ureteric bud epithelium is tightly coupled through intricate reciprocal signaling mechanisms between these three tissue compartments. Midkine, a target gene activated by retinoid signaling in the metanephros, encodes a secreted polypeptide with mitogenic and anti-apoptotic activities in a wide variety of cell types. Using immmunohistochemical methods we demonstrated that Midkine is found in the uninduced mesenchyme at the earliest stages of metanephric kidney development and only subsequently concentrated in the ureteric bud epithelium and basement membrane. The biological effects of purified recombinant Midkine were analyzed in metanephric organ culture experiments carried out in serum-free defined media. These studies revealed that Midkine selectively promoted the overgrowth of the Pax-2 and N-CAM positive nephrogenic mesenchymal cells, failed to stimulate expansion of the stromal compartment and suppressed branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud. Midkine suppressed apoptosis and stimulated cellular proliferation of the nephrogenic mesenchymal cells, and was capable of maintaining the viability of isolated mesenchymes cultured in the absence of the ureteric bud. These results suggest that Midkine may regulate the balance of epithelial and stromal progenitor cell populations of the metanephric mesenchyme during renal organogenesis.     

Differentiation of embryonic chick feather-forming and scale-forming tissues in transfilter cultures

The dermal-epidermal tissue interaction in the chick embryo, leading to the formation of feathers and scales, provides a good experimental system to study the transfer between tissues of signals which specify cell type. At certain times in development, the dermis controls whether the epidermis forms feathers or scales, each of which are characterized by the synthesis of specific beta-keratins. In our culture system, a dermal effect on epidermal differentiation can still be observed, even when the tissues are separated by a Nuclepore filter, although development is abnormal. Epidermal morphological and histological differentiation in transfilter cultures are distinct and recognizable, more closely resembling feather or scale development, depending on the regional origin of the dermis. Differentiation is more advanced when epidermis is cultured transfilter from scale dermis than from feather dermis, as assessed by morphology and histology, as well as the expression of the tissue-specific gene products, the beta-keratins. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel analysis of the beta-keratins reveals that scale dermis cultured transfilter from either presumptive scale or feather epidermis induces the production of 7 of the 9 scale-specific beta-keratins that we have identified. Feather dermis, although less effective in activating the feather gene program when cultured transfilter from either presumptive feather or scale epidermis, is able to turn on the synthesis of 3 to 6 of the 18 feather-specific beta-keratins that we have identified. However, scale epidermis in transfilter recombinants with feather dermis also continues to synthesize many of the scale-specific beta-keratins. Using transmission and scanning electron microscopy, we detect no cell contact between tissues separated by a 0.2-micron pore diameter Nuclepore filter, while 0.4-micron filters readily permit cell processes to traverse the filter. We find that epidermal differentiation is the same with either pore size filter. Furthermore, we do not detect a basement membrane in transfilter cultures, implying that neither direct cell contact between dermis and epidermis, nor a basement membrane between the tissues is required for the extent of epidermal differentiation that we observe.     

The differentiation of normal and muscle-free distal chick limb bud mesenchyme in micromass culture

Distal chick wing bud mesenchyme from stages 19 to 27 embryos has been grown in micromass culture. The behavior of cultures comprising mesenchyme located within 350 microns of the apical ectodermal ridge (distal zone mesenchyme) was compared to that of cultures of the immediately proximal mesenchyme (subdistal zone cultures). In cultures of the distal mesenchyme from stages 21-24 limbs, all of the cells stained immunocytochemically for type II collagen within 3 days, indicating ubiquitous chondrogenic differentiation. At stage 19 and 20, this behavior was only observed in cultures of the distal most 50-100 microns of the limb bud mesenchyme. Between stages 25 and 27, distal zone cultures failed to become entirely chondrogenic. At all stages, subdistal zone cultures always contained substantial areas of nonchondrogenic cells. The different behavior observed between distal zone and corresponding subdistal zone cultures appears to be a consequence of the presence of somite-derived presumptive muscle cells in the latter, since no such difference was observed in analagous cultures prepared from muscle-free wing buds. The high capacity of the distal zone for cartilage differentiation supports a view of pattern formation in which inhibition of cartilage is an important component. However, its consistent behavior in vitro indicates that micromass cultures do not reflect the in vivo differences between the distal zones at different stages. The subdistal region retains a high capacity of cartilage differentiation and the observed behavior in micromass reflects interactions with a different cell population.     

Midkine Promotes Selective Expansion of the Nephrogenic Mesenchyme During Kidney Organogenesis

During kidney development, the growth and development of the stromal and nephrogenic mesenchyme cell populations and the ureteric bud epithelium is tightly coupled through intricate reciprocal signaling mechanisms between these three tissue compartments. Midkine, a target gene activated by retinoid signaling in the metanephros, encodes a secreted polypeptide with mitogenic and anti-apoptotic activities in a wide variety of cell types. Using immmunohistochemical methods we demonstrated that Midkine is found in the uninduced mesenchyme at the earliest stages of metanephric kidney development and only subsequently concentrated in the ureteric bud epithelium and basement membrane. The biological effects of purified recombinant Midkine were analyzed in metanephric organ culture experiments carried out in serum-free defined media. These studies revealed that Midkine selectively promoted the overgrowth of the Pax-2 and N-CAM positive nephrogenic mesenchymal cells, failed to stimulate expansion of the stromal compartment and suppressed branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud. Midkine suppressed apoptosis and stimulated cellular proliferation of the nephrogenic mesenchymal cells, and was capable of maintaining the viability of isolated mesenchymes cultured in the absence of the ureteric bud. These results suggest that Midkine may regulate the balance of epithelial and stromal progenitor cell populations of the metanephric mesenchyme during renal organogenesis.Key Words: growth factor, proliferation, apoptosis, ureteric bud, branching morphogenesis, epithelial progenitor, development, signaling     

Transfilter analysis of the inductive influence of proventricular mesenchyme on stomach epithelial differentiation of chick embryos

Summary To clarify the precise conditions under which chick embryonic proventricular mesenchyme can induce proventricular epithelial differentiation, transfilter experiments were carried out. Six-day proventricular epithelium formed glands and expressed pepsinogen when a Nucleopore filter with a pore size of more than 0.6 m, but not 0.2 m, was inserted between the epithelium and the proventricular mesenchyme. The larger the pore size of the filter, the more elongated the glands and the more pepsinogen was induced in the explants. The quail nuclear marker and scanning electron microscopy were used to examine penetration of mesenchymal cells through the Nuclepore filter. The filter of more than 0.2 m pore size allowed cell processes of mesenchymal cells to pass through. However, only the filter with a pore size of more than 0.6 m allowed actual migration of mesenchymal cells through the filter, and the larger the pore size of the filter, the more mesenchymal cells passed through. Under the same conditions 6-day and 4.5-day gizzard epithelium formed glands and expressed pepsinogen. These results indicate that a flow of diffusible substances through a Nuclepore filter and even direct contact of a few short cell processes of mesenchymal cells with epithelial cells are not sufficient for induction, and that direct contact of mesenchymal cell processes and/or mesenchymal cells with epithelial cells over a considerably wide area may be prerequisite for the induction.     

Hox10 genes function in kidney development in the differentiation and integration of the cortical stroma

Organogenesis requires the differentiation and integration of distinct populations of cells to form a functional organ. In the kidney, reciprocal interactions between the ureter and the nephrogenic mesenchyme are required for organ formation. Additionally, the differentiation and integration of stromal cells are also necessary for the proper development of this organ. Much remains to be understood regarding the origin of cortical stromal cells and the pathways involved in their formation and function. By generating triple mutants in the Hox10 paralogous group genes, we demonstrate that Hox10 genes play a critical role in the developing kidney. Careful examination of control kidneys show that Foxd1-expressing stromal precursor cells are first observed in a cap-like pattern anterior to the metanephric mesenchyme and these cells subsequently integrate posteriorly into the kidney periphery as development proceeds. While the initial cap-like pattern of Foxd1-expressing cortical stromal cells is unaffected in Hox10 mutants, these cells fail to become properly integrated into the kidney, and do not differentiate to form the kidney capsule. Consistent with loss of cortical stromal cell function, Hox10 mutant kidneys display reduced and aberrant ureter branching, decreased nephrogenesis. These data therefore provide critical novel insights into the cellular and genetic mechanisms governing cortical cell development during kidney organogenesis. These results, combined with previous evidence demonstrating that Hox11 genes are necessary for patterning the metanephric mesenchyme, support a model whereby distinct populations in the nephrogenic cord are regulated by unique Hox codes, and that differential Hox function along the AP axis of the nephrogenic cord is critical for the differentiation and integration of these cell types during kidney organogenesis.     

Two distinct regulatory steps in cartilage differentiation

The effect of developmental stage on chondrogenic capacity in high-density cell cultures of chick embryonic wing bud mesenchyme is examined. Mesenchyme from stage 19 embryos forms aggregates of closely associated cells which do not form cartilage matrix, nor contain significant levels of type II collagen that are detectable by immunofluorescence, unless they are treated with dibutyryl cyclic AMP. Mesenchyme from stage 24 embryonic wing buds in high-density cell cultures will spontaneously form cartilage, as defined by electron microscopy and immunofluorescence with antibody to type II collagen. Cultures prepared from stage 26 wings form numerous aggregates which fail to accumulate an Alcian blue-staining matrix and which resemble mesenchyme cells morphologically. However, because these cells show considerable intracellular immunofluorescence for type II collagen, they are actually unexpressed cartilage cells. Several treatments, including exposure to dibutyryl cyclic AMP, ascorbic acid and an atmosphere of 5% oxygen, or mixture with small numbers of stage 24 wing mesenchyme cells, stimulate expression, as determined by the accumulation of an Alcian blue-staining matrix and an ultrastructurally recognizable cartilage matrix. Since the addition of similar numbers of differentiated cartilage cells does not stimulate expression of stage 26 cells, it is proposed that initial cartilage expression is dependent on a mesenchyme-specific influence which might be removed by cell dissociation. These studies demonstrate that there are at least two distinct transitions in cartilage differentiation: one involves the conversion of mesenchyme to unexpressed chondrocytes and the second involves mesenchyme-dependent expression of chondrogenic differentiation.