Relative efficiency of anticodons in reading the valine codons during protein synthesis in vitro.

Using a protein synthesizing in vitro system programmed with MS 2-RNA, the relative efficiency (in the presence of each other) of valine tRNAs with the anticodons U*AC (U* represents 5-oxyacetic acid uridine monophosphate), GAC, and IAC to read the valine codons was investigated. An anticodon which can read all three positions of the codon according to the rules of Watson-Crick base-pairing and the wobble hypothesis is an order of magnitude more efficient than an anticodon which misreads the codon by reading only the first two positions and presumably disregards the third nucleotide of the codon. There are two seeming exceptions to this behavior: the anticodon U*AC reads the codon GUU quite efficiently and IAC is as effective as U*AC in reading the codon GUG. The significance of these exceptions is evaluated with respect to the organization and evolution of the genetic code.     

Increased translational fidelity caused by the antibiotic kasugamycin and ribosomal ambiguity in mutants harbouring the ksgA gene

The aminoglycoside kasugamycin, which has previously been shown to inhibit initiation of protein biosynthesis in vitro, also affects translational accuracy in vitro. This is deduced from the observation that the drug decreases the incorporation of histidine relative to alanine into the coat protein of phage MS2, the gene of which is devoid of histidine codons. The read-through of the MS2 coat cistron, due to frameshifts in vitro, is also suppressed by the antibiotic. In contrast, streptomycin enhances histidine incorporation and read-through in this system. The effects of kasugamycin take place at concentrations that do not inhibit coat protein biosynthesis. Kasugamycin-resistant mutants (ksgA) lacking dimethylation of two adjacent adenosines in 16 S ribosomal RNA, show an increased leakiness of nonsense and frameshift mutants (in the absence of antibiotic). They are therefore phenotypically similar to previously described ribosomal ambiguity mutants (ram).     

Possible evolutionary steps in the genetic code

In mammalian mitochondrial codes, fourfold codons wobble-pair with UNN anticodons so that U wobbles with U, C, A and G. Twofold pyrimidine-terminated codons pair with GNN and twofold purine-terminated codons pair with UNN. These properties enable a prediction to be made for evolution of the universal genetic code. It was postulated (1) that an archetypal code of 16 quartets coded for 15 amino acids. If this code used UNN anticodons, then duplication of tRNA genes, followed by mutations in the anticodons and aminoacylation sites, would give rise to the present universal code.     

Four-base codon/anticodon strategy and non-enzymatic aminoacylation for protein engineering with non-natural amino acids

Techniques for position-specific incorporation of non-natural amino acids in an in vitro protein synthesizing system are described. First, a PNA-assisted non-enzymatic tRNA aminoacylation with a variety of natural and non-natural amino acids is described. With this technique, one can aminoacylate a specific tRNA simply by adding a preformed amino acid activated ester-PNA conjugate into an in vitro protein biosynthesizing system. Second, the genetic code is expanded by introducing 4-base codons that can be exclusively translated to non-natural amino acids. The most advantageous point of the 4-base codon strategy is to introduce multiple amino acids into specific positions in single proteins by using mutually orthogonal 4-base codons and orthogonal tRNAs. An easy and quick method for preparation of tRNAs possessing 4-base anticodons is also described. Combination of the non-enzymatic aminoacylation and the 4-base codon/anticodon strategy gives an easy and widely applicable technique for incorporating a variety of non-natural amino acids into proteins in vitro.     

Codon reading and translational error. Reading of the glutamine and lysine codons during protein synthesis in vitro

The reading of glutamine and lysine codons during protein synthesis in vitro has been investigated using an MS2-RNA-programed system derived from Escherichia coli. Under conditions when either glutaminyl-tRNA1Gln (s2UUG) or glutaminyl-tRNA2Gln (CUG) was the only source of glutamine for protein synthesis both tRNAs were able to read the glutamine codons CAA and CAG as indicated by the incorporation of labeled glutamine into the pertinent coat protein tryptic peptides. On the other hand, when the two glutamine tRNAs competed for the codon CAA the reading efficiency of the anticodon s2UUG, which reads the codon according to the wobble rules, was almost 40 times higher than that of the competing anticodon CUG, which reads the codon by "two out of three," i.e. it cannot form a regular base pair with the third codon position. In reading the codon CAG the anticodon CUG was approximately eight times more efficient than the anticodon s2UUG. The lysyl-tRNA1Lys (CUU) could not alone sustain any detectable coat protein synthesis in the MS2 system indicating that there was no significant reading of the lysine codon AAA. This conclusion is supported by the outcome of experiments where lysyl-tRNA1Lys (CUU) and lysyl-tRNA2Lys (s2UUU) competed for the codon AAA. The reading efficiency of the anticodon CUU was less than 1% of that of the competing s2UUU which represents the limit of resolution of our experimental system. When the two lysine tRNAs competed for the codon AAG the anticodon CUU was about four times more efficient than s2UUU. These results are discussed in the context of the two out of three hypothesis, which attempts to relate the frequency of such reading to the hydrogen bonding properties of the codon nucleotides.     

Evolution of the Genetic Code by Incorporation of Amino Acids that Improved or Changed Protein Function

Fifty years have passed since the genetic code was deciphered, but how the genetic code came into being has not been satisfactorily addressed. It is now widely accepted that the earliest genetic code did not encode all 20 amino acids found in the universal genetic code as some amino acids have complex biosynthetic pathways and likely were not available from the environment. Therefore, the genetic code evolved as pathways for synthesis of new amino acids became available. One hypothesis proposes that early in the evolution of the genetic code four amino acids—valine, alanine, aspartic acid, and glycine—were coded by GNC codons (N = any base) with the remaining codons being nonsense codons. The other sixteen amino acids were subsequently added to the genetic code by changing nonsense codons into sense codons for these amino acids. Improvement in protein function is presumed to be the driving force behind the evolution of the code, but how improved function was achieved by adding amino acids has not been examined. Based on an analysis of amino acid function in proteins, an evolutionary mechanism for expansion of the genetic code is described in which individual coded amino acids were replaced by new amino acids that used nonsense codons differing by one base change from the sense codons previously used. The improved or altered protein function afforded by the changes in amino acid function provided the selective advantage underlying the expansion of the genetic code. Analysis of amino acid properties and functions explains why amino acids are found in their respective positions in the genetic code.     

Unambiguous correspondence and complementarity of the chemical properties of amino acids and anticodons of the genetic code

The chemical language of genetic code is proposed. As a result of chemical language application for the analysis of the modern genetic code, the existence of an unambiguous correspondence between the chemical properties of amino acids and their coding triplets (codons and anticodons) is shown. This confirms the hypothesis of the code chemical determination. The complementarity between the chemical properties of amino acids and their anticodons (but not the codons) has been found also to exist. This observation supports the hypothesis of the genetic code determination by the direct recognition and also underlines the primary role of anticodon in the origin of genetic code in comparison with codons.     

Characterization of ribosomal frameshift events by protein sequence analysis

In cell-free protein synthesis studies with RNA from phage MS2 as template, normal Escherichia coli tRNASer3 promotes two base translocation at GCA alanine codons with a resultant shift of ribosomes to the minus one reading frame. Similarly, normal tRNAThr3 promotes two base translocation at CCG proline codons. These conclusions were reached by amino acid sequencing of tryptic peptides or cyanogen bromide fragments that contained the reading frame shift site. It is proposed that these frameshift events occur by a two-base pair interaction between the anticodons of these exceptional tRNAs and the noncognate codons.     

The new classification scheme of the genetic code, its early evolution, and tRNA usage

We present a new classification scheme of the genetic code. In contrast to the standard form it clearly shows five codon symmetries: codon-anticodon, codon-reverse codon, and sense-antisense symmetry, as well as symmetries with respect to purine-pyrimidine (A versus G, U versus C) and keto-aminobase (G versus U, A versus C) exchanges. We study the number of tRNA genes of 16 archaea, 81 bacteria and 7 eucaryotes to analyze whether these symmetries are reflected in the corresponding tRNA usage patterns. Two features are especially striking: reverse stop codons do not have their own tRNAs (just one exception in human), and A** anticodons are significantly suppressed. Our classification scheme of the genetic code and the identified tRNA usage patterns support recent speculations about the early evolution of the genetic code. In particular, pre-tRNAs might have had the ability to bind their codons in two directions to the corresponding codons.     

Initiation of in vivo protein synthesis with non-methionine amino acids

Methionine is the universal amino acid for initiation of protein synthesis in all known organisms. The amino acid is coupled to a specific initiator methionine tRNA by methionyl-tRNA synthetase. In Escherichia coli, attachment of methionine to the initiator tRNA (tRNA(fMet)) has been shown to be dependent on synthetase recognition of the methionine anticodon CAU (complementary to the initiation codon AUG), [Schulman, L. H., & Pelka, H. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 6755-6759]. We show here that alteration of the anticodon of tRNA(fMet) to GAC or GAA leads to aminoacylation of the initiator tRNA with valine or phenylalanine. In addition, tRNA(fMet) carrying these amino acids initiates in vivo protein synthesis when provided with initiation codons complementary to the modified anticodons. These results indicate that the sequence of the anticodon of tRNA(fMet) dictates the identity of the amino acid attached to the initiator tRNA in vivo and that there are no subsequent steps which prevent initiation of E. coli protein synthesis by valine and phenylalanine. The methods described here also provide a convenient in vivo assay for further examination of the role of the anticodon in tRNA amino acid acceptor identity.     

Partitioning of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in two classes could have been encoded in a strand-symmetric RNA world

The "chicken-or-egg" dilemma dictates that archaic tRNAs be aminoacylated by ribozymic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, rAARSs, with protein synthetases (pAARSs) emerging later and, strikingly in two versions. However, the distribution of these two versions among the codons also suggests their involvement in development of the genetic code. Here we propose a solution to this controversy, which relies on a primordial complementarity hypothesis that in a strand-symmetric RNA world both complementary replicas of many genes could encode the first proteins. Accordingly, if one rearranges the code table in a manner that puts complementary codons directly against each other, an almost perfect mirror symmetry in tRNA aminoacylation by the two groups of synthetases is revealed. Specifically, the pairs of complementary anticodons from the same pAARS class tend to contain RR and YY dinucleotides at first and second versus third and second positions, whereas in pairs of pAARSs from the different classes these positions are occupied by YR and RY, including CG, GC, UA, and AU palindromes. The latter are indistinguishable in complementary anticodons, thus leading to erroneous aminoacylation (note that there is no such problem for RR- and YY-containing complementary anticodons). This can be averted by "spreading out" tRNA recognition by two rAARSs away from the anticodons in the opposite directions, giving two complementary rAARSs. The principle of evolutionary continuity suggests that their protein successors also arose on complementary strands. Our analyses support this hypothesis.     

tRNA hopping: enhancement by an expanded anticodon.

At a low level wild-type tRNA(1Val) inserts a single amino acid (valine) for the five nucleotide sequence GUGUA which has overlapping valine codons. Mutants of tRNA(1Val) with an insertion of A or U between positions 34 and 35 of their anticodons have enhanced reading of the quintuplet sequences. We propose that this decoding occurs by a hopping mechanism rather than by quintuplet pairing. Such hopping involves disengagement of the paired codon and anticodon with the mRNA slipping two (or more) bases along the ribosomal--peptidyl tRNA complex and subsequently re-pairing at a second codon--the landing site. The mutant with the anticodon sequence 3'CAAU5' 'hops' over the stop codon in the mRNA sequence GUG UAA GUU with the insertion of a single amino acid (valine). In contrast, in reading the same sequence, the mutant with the anticodon 3'CAUU5' hops onto the stop with the insertion of two valine residues. It is likely that in some instances of hopping alternate anticodon bases are used for the initial pairing and at the landing site.     

The effect of point mutations affecting Escherichia coli tryptophan tRNA on anticodon-anticodon interactions and on UGA suppression

tRNA species in Escherichia coli that translate codons starting with U contain 2-methyl-thio-N6-isopentenyl-adenosine in position 37, 3' adjacent to the anticodon. The role of this hypermodification in protein synthesis and trp operon attenuation has been investigated. Temperature-jump relaxation methods have been applied to study the interaction between E. coli tRNAPro, with anticodon VGG (V is uridine-5-oxyacetic acid) complementary to that of tRNATrp, and three species of E. coli tRNATrp: wild type tRNATrp (with ms2i6A37 and G24), UGA suppressor tRNATrp (with ms2i6A37 and A24 in the dihydrouridine stem but the same anticodon CCA), and the same suppressor molecule but ms2i6A-deficient as a result of the mutation miaA. Complex formation between tRNAPro and ms2i6A-containing tRNATrp shows thermodynamic parameters close to those found for several other pairs of tRNA with complementary anticodons. However, ms2i6A-deficient tRNATrp makes less stable complexes with tRNAPro, which dissociate eightfold faster. No effect on the complementary anticodon interaction of the mutation in the dihydrouridine stem can be detected. When the tRNA analogous to the opal codon, E. coli tRNASerIV (anticodon VGA) replaces tRNAPro in similar experiments, very weak complexes are observed with both normally hypermodified species of tRNATrp, the wild type and UGA suppressor; these show a lifetime about 50-fold shorter than with tRNAPro, but are again similar. No complex formation is detectable with the ms2i6A-deficient species. This may explain why the hypermodification is necessary for the efficient suppression of the UGA terminator of Q beta coat protein in vitro. The data on complexes with tRNAPro suggest that deficiency in ms2i6A may also reduce the efficiency of UGG reading. Thus, miaA may affect trp operon attenuation by slowing translation of the tandem UGG codons in the leader sequence. Temperature-jump differential spectra suggest that ms2i6 stabilizes the anticodon interaction by improved stacking of base 37.     

Evolutionary changes in the genetic code

The genetic code has been influenced by directional mutation pressure affecting the base composition of DNA, sometimes in the direction of increased GC content and at other times, in the direction of AT. Such pressure led to changes in species-specific usages of codons and tRNA anticodons, and also in amino acid assignments of codons in mitochondria and in several intact organisms. These code changes are probably recent evolutionary events. The genetic code is not 'frozen', but instead it is still evolving.     

On the origin of the translation system and the genetic code in the RNA world by means of natural selection, exaptation, and subfunctionalization

Background  

The origin of the translation system is, arguably, the central and the hardest problem in the study of the origin of life, and one of the hardest in all evolutionary biology. The problem has a clear catch-22 aspect: high translation fidelity hardly can be achieved without a complex, highly evolved set of RNAs and proteins but an elaborate protein machinery could not evolve without an accurate translation system. The origin of the genetic code and whether it evolved on the basis of a stereochemical correspondence between amino acids and their cognate codons (or anticodons), through selectional optimization of the code vocabulary, as a "frozen accident" or via a combination of all these routes is another wide open problem despite extensive theoretical and experimental studies. Here we combine the results of comparative genomics of translation system components, data on interaction of amino acids with their cognate codons and anticodons, and data on catalytic activities of ribozymes to develop conceptual models for the origins of the translation system and the genetic code.     

Mutual influence of the secondary structure and information content of a messenger RNA

The presence of secondary structure in a messenger RNA suggests that natural selection has moulded the nucleotide sequence to meet the demands of base-pairing as well as those of the encoded amino acid sequence. Despite the degeneracy of the genetic code, neither requirement can be fulfilled independently of the other, so the evolved RNA and protein structures must represent a compromise. One feature of this compromise is illustrated by the structure of the coat protein gene of bacteriophage MS2. Those amino acid residues which, when represented by base-paired codons, impose the most severe limitations on the overall protein sequence, show a clear tendency to avoid being encoded in base-paired regions of the messenger RNA.     

A mechanism for stop codon recognition by the ribosome: a bioinformatic approach.

Protein synthesis in ribosomes requires two kinds of tRNAs: initiation and elongation. The former initiates the process (formylmethionine tRNA in prokaryotes and special methionine tRNA in eukaryotes). The latter participates in the synthesis proper, recognizing the sense codons. Synthesis is also assisted by special proteins: initiation, elongation, and termination factors. The termination factors are necessary to recognize stop codons (UAG, UGA, and UAA) and to release the complete protein chain from the elongation tRNA preceding a stop codon. No termination tRNA capable of recognizing stop codons by their anticodons is known. The termination factors are thought to do this. In the large ribosomal RNA, we found two sites that, like tRNAs, contain the anticodon hairpin but with triplets complementary to stop codons. One site is hairpin 69 from domain IV; the other site is hairpin 89, domain V. By analogy, we call them termination tRNAs: Ter-tRNA1 and Ter-tRNA2, respectively, even though they transport no amino acids, and suggest that they directly pair to stop codons. The termination factors only aid in this recognition, making it specific and reliable. A strong argument in favor of our hypothesis comes from vertebrate mitochondria. They are known to acquire two new stop codons, AGA and AGG. In the standard code, these are two out of six arginine codons. We revealed that the corresponding anticodons, UCU and CCU, have evolved in Ter-tRNA1 of these mitochondria.     

Computer simulation of ribosome editing

A stochastic model of protein synthesis was modified by including the process of dissociating peptidyl-tRNA from ribosomes. To simulate ribosome editing, the probability of dissociation was assumed to be high if the peptidyl-tRNA was erroneous; that is, if it resulted from transfer of a peptide to an aminoacyl-tRNA that was inappropriate relative to the mRNA codon. The effects of amino acid starvation on protein synthesis were simulated both by increasing the probability of such erring at and by reducing the conditional probability of elongation at “hungry” codons, those whose correct amino acid was in short supply. These probabilities were varied systematically to simulate tryptophan limitation during synthesis of coat protein from bacteriophage MS2.Significant reduction, during starvation, in the synthesis of complete coat protein required large reductions in the probability of elongation at hungry codons but only small increases in the probability of erring. Enhanced dissociation of peptidyl-tRNA during starvation, followed rapidly by dissociation of ribosomes from mRNA, led to reductions in mean polysome size, a result that had been interpreted by others as due to some effect of starvation on the initiation of protein synthesis.Results from experiments by Goldman (1982) on the cell-free synthesis of MS2 coat protein during tryptophan starvation could be mimicked in detail by the computer simulations. A simple competition between correct and erroneous amino acids was sufficient to explain the tryptophan dependence of complete coat protein and internal peptide syntheses. Values for the Michaelis constants were derived from the computer simulations.     

Genetic code development by stop codon takeover

A novel theoretical consideration of the origin and evolution of the genetic code is presented. Code development is viewed from the perspective of simultaneously evolving codons, anticodons and amino acids. Early code structure was determined primarily by thermodynamic stability considerations, requiring simplicity in primordial codes. More advanced coding stages could arise as biological systems became more complex and precise in their replication. To be consistent with these ideas, a model is described in which codons become permanently associated with amino acids only when a codon-anticodon pairing is strong enough to permit rapid translation. Hence all codons are essentially chain-termination or "stop" codons until tRNA adaptors evolve having the ability to bind tightly to them. This view, which draws support from several lines of evidence, differs from the prevalent thinking on code evolution which holds that codons specifying newer amino acids were derived from codons encoding older amino acids.