Porphyromonas gingivalis selectively up-regulates the HIV-1 coreceptor CCR5 in oral keratinocytes

Primary infection of oral epithelial cells by HIV-1, if it occurs, could promote systemic infection. Most primary systemic infections are associated with R5-type HIV-1 targeting the R5-specific coreceptor CCR5, which is not usually expressed on oral keratinocytes. Because coinfection with other microbes has been suggested to modulate cellular infection by HIV-1, we hypothesized that oral keratinocytes may up-regulate CCR5 in response to the oral endogenous pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis by cysteine-protease (gingipains) activation of the protease-activated receptors (PARs) or LPS signaling through the TLRs. The OKF6/TERT-2-immortalized normal human oral keratinocyte line expressed CXCR4, whereas CCR5 was not detectable. When exposed to P. gingivalis ATCC 33277, TERT-2 cells induced greater time-dependent expression of CCR5-specific mRNA and surface coreceptors than CXCR4. By comparing arg- (Rgp) and lys-gingipain (Kgp) mutants, a mutant deficient in both proteases, and the action of trypsin, P. gingivalis Rgp was strongly suggested to cleave PAR-1 and PAR-2 to up-regulate CCR5. CCR5 was also slightly up-regulated by an isogenic gingipain-deficient mutant, suggesting the presence of a nongingipain-mediated mechanism. Purified P. gingivalis LPS also up-regulated CCR5. Blocking TLR2 and TLR4 receptors with Abs attenuated induction of CCR5, suggesting LPS signaling through TLRs. P. gingivalis, therefore, selectively up-regulated CCR5 by two independent signaling pathways, Rgp acting on PAR-1 and PAR-2, and LPS on TLR2 and TLR4. By inducing CCR5 expression, P. gingivalis coinfection could promote selective R5-type HIV-1 infection of oral keratinocytes.     

Self-protection of individual CD4+ T cells against R5 HIV-1 infection by the synthesis of anti-viral CCR5 ligands

It is well established that paracrine secretion of anti-viral CCR5 ligands by CD8+ and CD4+ T cells can block the infection of activated CD4+ T cells by R5 and dual-tropic isolates of HIV-1. By contrast, because CD4+ T cells can be infected by HIV-1 and at least some subsets secrete anti-viral CCR5 ligands, it is possible that these ligands protect against HIV-1 via autocrine as well as paracrine pathways. Here we use a model primary CD4+ T cell response in vitro to show that individual CD4+ T cells that secrete anti-viral CCR5 ligands are 'self-protected' against infection with R5 but not X4 strains of HIV-1. This protection is selective for CD4+ T cells that secrete anti-viral CCR5 ligands in that activated CD4+ T cells in the same cultures remain infectable with R5 HIV-1. These data are most consistent with an autocrine pathway of protection in this system and indicate a previously unappreciated selective pressure on the emergence of viral variants and CD4+ T cell phenotypes during HIV-1 infection.     

HIV-1 Resistance to CCR5 Antagonists Associated with Highly Efficient Use of CCR5 and Altered Tropism on Primary CD4+ T Cells

We previously reported on a panel of HIV-1 clade B envelope (Env) proteins isolated from a patient treated with the CCR5 antagonist aplaviroc (APL) that were drug resistant. These Envs used the APL-bound conformation of CCR5, were cross resistant to other small-molecule CCR5 antagonists, and were isolated from the patient''s pretreatment viral quasispecies as well as after therapy. We analyzed viral and host determinants of resistance and their effects on viral tropism on primary CD4⁺ T cells. The V3 loop contained residues essential for viral resistance to APL, while additional mutations in gp120 and gp41 modulated the magnitude of drug resistance. However, these mutations were context dependent, being unable to confer resistance when introduced into a heterologous virus. The resistant virus displayed altered binding between gp120 and CCR5 such that the virus became critically dependent on the N′ terminus of CCR5 in the presence of APL. In addition, the drug-resistant Envs studied here utilized CCR5 very efficiently: robust virus infection occurred even when very low levels of CCR5 were expressed. However, recognition of drug-bound CCR5 was less efficient, resulting in a tropism shift toward effector memory cells upon infection of primary CD4⁺ T cells in the presence of APL, with relative sparing of the central memory CD4⁺ T cell subset. If such a tropism shift proves to be a common feature of CCR5-antagonist-resistant viruses, then continued use of CCR5 antagonists even in the face of virologic failure could provide a relative degree of protection to the T_CM subset of CD4⁺ T cells and result in improved T cell homeostasis and immune function.Entry of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) into target cells is a complex, multistep process that is initiated by interactions between the viral envelope (Env) protein gp120 and the host cell receptor CD4, which trigger conformational changes in gp120 that form and orient the coreceptor binding site (9, 24). Upon binding to coreceptor, which is either CCR5 or CXCR4 for primary HIV isolates, Env undergoes further conformational changes resulting in insertion of the gp41 fusion peptide into the host cell membrane and gp41-mediated membrane fusion (8, 15, 26). Targeting stages of the HIV entry process with antiretroviral drugs is a productive method of inhibiting HIV replication, as demonstrated by the potent antiviral effects of small-molecule CCR5 antagonists and fusion inhibitors (23, 35, 49). As with other antiretroviral drugs, HIV can develop resistance to entry inhibitors, and a detailed understanding of viral and host determinants of resistance will be critical to the optimal clinical use of these agents.The coreceptor binding site that is induced by CD4 engagement consists of noncontiguous regions in the bridging sheet and V3 loop of gp120 (4, 18, 42, 43, 50). Interactions between gp120 and CCR5 occur in at least two distinct areas: (i) the bridging sheet and the stem of the V3 loop interact with sulfated tyrosine residues in the N′ terminus of CCR5, and (ii) the crown of the V3 loop is thought to engage the extracellular loops (ECLs), particularly ECL2, of CCR5 (10-12, 14, 18, 28). Small-molecule CCR5 antagonists bind to a hydrophobic pocket in the transmembrane helices of CCR5 and exert their effects on HIV by altering the position of the ECLs, making them allosteric inhibitors of HIV infection (13, 31, 32, 46, 52). The conformational changes in CCR5 that are induced by CCR5 antagonists vary to some degree with different drugs, as evidenced by differential binding of antibodies and chemokines to various drug-bound forms of CCR5 (47, 54).CCR5 antagonists are unusual among antiretroviral agents in that they bind to a host protein rather than a viral target, and therefore the virus cannot directly mutate the drug binding site to evade pharmacologic pressure. Nevertheless, HIV can escape susceptibility to CCR5 antagonists. One mechanism by which this occurs is the use of the alternative HIV coreceptor, CXCR4. In vivo, this has most often been manifest as the outgrowth of R5/X4-tropic HIV isolates that were present in the patient''s circulating viral swarm prior to therapy (17, 27, 55). A second mechanism of HIV resistance to CCR5 antagonists is the use of drug-bound CCR5 as a coreceptor for entry. Resistant viruses that utilize drug-bound CCR5 have been identified following in vitro passaging with multiple CCR5 antagonists (1, 2, 22, 33, 36, 51, 56). Recently, we identified a panel of viral Envs able to use aplaviroc (APL)-bound CCR5 that were isolated from a patient (21, 48). The Envs from this patient were cross resistant to the CCR5 antagonists AD101, TAK779, SCH-C, and maraviroc. Surprisingly, this antiretroviral-naïve patient harbored Envs resistant to aplaviroc prior to the initiation of therapy. In the present study, we have examined viral and host factors that contribute to aplaviroc resistance and examined the consequences of resistance for viral tropism. Aplaviroc resistance determinants were located within the V3 loop of gp120, although additional residues diffusely spread throughout the gp120 and gp41 proteins modulated the magnitude of drug resistance. The resistant virus displayed altered interactions between gp120 and CCR5 such that the virus became critically dependent upon the N′ terminus of drug-bound CCR5. This differential recognition of CCR5 in the presence of aplaviroc was also associated with increased dependence on a higher CCR5 receptor density for efficient virus infection and a tropism shift toward effector memory cells on primary CD4⁺ T cells.     

Humanized mice dually challenged with R5 and X4 HIV-1 show preferential R5 viremia and restricted X4 infection of CCR5+CD4+ T cells

CCR5-tropic (R5) immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strains are highly transmissible during the early stage of infection in humans, whereas CXCR4-tropic (X4) strains are less transmissible. This study aimed to explore the basis for early phase R5 and X4 HIV-1 infection in vivo by using humanized mice dually challenged with R5 HIV-1_NLAD8-D harboring DsRed and X4 HIV-1_NL-E harboring EGFP. Whereas R5 HIV-1 replicated well, X4 HIV-1 caused only transient viremia with variable kinetics; however, this was distinct from the low level but persistent viremia observed in mice challenged with X4 HIV-1 alone. Flow cytometric analysis of HIV-1-infected cells revealed that X4 HIV-1 infection of CCR5⁺CD4⁺ T cells was significantly suppressed in the presence of R5 HIV-1. X4 HIV-1 was more cytopathic than R5 HIV-1; however, this was not the cause of restricted X4 HIV-1 infection because there were no significant differences in the mortality rates of CCR5⁺ and CCR5⁻ cells within the X4 HIV-1-infected cell populations. Taken together, these results suggest that restricted infection of CCR5⁺CD4⁺ T cells by X4 HIV-1 (occurring via a still-to-be-identified mechanism) might contribute to the preferential transmission of R5 HIV-1 during the early phase of infection.     

The HIV-1 Tat protein selectively enhances CXCR4 and inhibits CCR5 expression in megakaryocytic K562 cells

The hematopoietic compartments act as long-term reservoirs for human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1). Although hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) are rarely infectable, HPCs committed to the megakaryocytic lineage can be infected and support a productive infection by both the X4 and R5 strains of HIV-1. Indeed, in contrast to the CD34+ progenitors, the lineage-committed HPCs express high levels of the HIV-1 co-receptors, CXCR4 and CCR5. The HIV-1 transactivator (Tat) protein has been shown to alter co-receptor expression in T lymphocytes and macrophages. We hypothesized that Tat may regulate co-receptor expression in lineage-specific HPCs as well. We have monitored the effects of Tat protein on co-receptor expression and on lineage-specific differentiation, using the HPC cell line, K562. Butyric acid (BA)-induced erythroid differentiation in K562 cells was suppressed by 1-100 ng/ml of Tat, as evident from a 70-80% decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) production and a 10-30-fold decrease in glycophorin-A expression. However, Tat treatment enhanced phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-induced megakaryocytic differentiation, as evident from a 180-210% increase in 3H-serotonin uptake and a 5-12-fold increase in CD61 expression. Tat did not significantly alter co-receptor expression in erythroid cells. However, Tat co-treatment profoundly effected both CXCR4 and CCR5 gene expression and protein levels in megakaryocytic cells. In PMA-stimulated cells, Tat increased CXCR4 and decreased in CCR5 expression, this was potentiated in cells chronically exposed to Tat. In conclusion, Tat protein suppresses erythroid and facilitates megakaryocytic differentiation of K562 cells. In megakaryocytic cells, Tat differentially effected CXCR4 and CCR5 expression. Because megakaryocytes may play a crucial role in HIV-1 infectivity in viral reservoirs, our findings implicate a role for Tat protein in dictating co-receptor usage in lineage-committed HPCs.     

Gp120 V3-dependent impairment of R5 HIV-1 infectivity due to virion-incorporated CCR5

Entry of R5 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) into target cells requires sequential interactions of the envelope glycoprotein gp120 with the receptor CD4 and the coreceptor CCR5. We investigated replication of 45 R5 viral clones derived from the HIV-1JR-FLan library carrying 0-10 random amino acid substitutions in the gp120 V3 loop. It was found that 6.7% (3/45) of the viruses revealed >or=10-fold replication suppression in PM1/CCR5 cells expressing high levels of CCR5 compared with PM1 cells expressing low levels of CCR5. In HIV-1V3L#08, suppression of replication was not associated with entry events and viral production but with a marked decrease in infectivity of nascent progeny virus. HIV-1V3L#08, generated from infected PM1/CCR5 cells, was 98% immunoprecipitated by anti-CCR5 monoclonal antibody T21/8, whereas the other infectious viruses were only partially precipitated, suggesting that incorporation of larger amounts of CCR5 into the virions caused impairment of viral infectivity in HIV-1V3L#08. The results demonstrate the implications of an alternative influence of CCR5 on HIV-1 replication.     

Natural antibodies to CCR5 from breast milk block infection of macrophages and dendritic cells with primary R5-tropic HIV-1

In the present study, we demonstrate that breast milk of 66% and 83% of HIV-seronegative and seropositive women, respectively, contains natural Abs of the secretory IgA and IgG isotypes directed against the CCR5 coreceptor for R5-tropic strains of HIV-1. Abs to CCR5 were affinity purified on a matrix to which a synthetic peptide corresponding to the second extracellular loop of CCR5 had been coupled. The purified Abs bound to the CCR5 peptide in a dose-dependent fashion and to both native CCR5 expressed by Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with CCR5 gene, macrophages, and immature dendritic cells. Although the avidity differed, the amount of anti-CCR5 Abs did not significantly differ between breast milk of HIV-seropositive and -seronegative women. Purified anti-CCR5 Abs inhibited up to 75% infection of macrophages and dendritic cells with HIV(BaL) and HIV(JR-CSF). Our observations provide evidence for a role of natural Abs to CCR5 in breast milk in controlling transmissibility of HIV through breastfeeding.     

HLA-DR+ CD38+ CD4+ T lymphocytes have elevated CCR5 expression and produce the majority of R5-tropic HIV-1 RNA in vivo

Percentages of activated T cells correlate with HIV-1 disease progression, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. We hypothesized that HLA-DR(+) CD38(+) (DR(+) 38(+)) CD4(+) T cells produce the majority of HIV-1 due to elevated expression of CCR5 and CXCR4. In phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated CD8-depleted peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) infected with HIV-1 green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter viruses, DR(-) 38(+) T cells constituted the majority of CCR5 (R5)-tropic (median, 62%) and CXCR4 (X4)-tropic HIV-1-producing cells (median, 61%), although cell surface CCR5 and CXCR4 were not elevated in this subset of cells. In lymph nodes from untreated individuals infected with R5-tropic HIV-1, percentages of CCR5(+) cells were elevated in DR(+) 38(+) CD4(+) T cells (median, 36.4%) compared to other CD4(+) T-cell subsets (median values of 5.7% for DR(-) 38(-) cells, 19.4% for DR(+) 38(-) cells, and 7.6% for DR(-) 38(+) cells; n = 18; P < 0.001). In sorted CD8(-) lymph node T cells, median HIV-1 RNA copies/10(5) cells was higher for DR(+) 38(+) cells (1.8 × 10(6)) than for DR(-) 38(-) (0.007 × 10(6)), DR(-) 38(+) (0.064 × 10(6)), and DR(+) 38(-) (0.18 × 10(6)) subsets (n = 8; P < 0.001 for all). After adjusting for percentages of subsets, a median of 87% of viral RNA was harbored by DR(+) 38(+) cells. Percentages of CCR5(+) CD4(+) T cells and concentrations of CCR5 molecules among subsets predicted HIV-1 RNA levels among CD8(-) DR/38 subsets (P < 0.001 for both). Median HIV-1 DNA copies/10(5) cells was higher in DR(+) 38(+) cells (5,360) than in the DR(-) 38(-) (906), DR(-) 38(+) (814), and DR(+) 38(-) (1,984) subsets (n = 7; P ≤ 0.031). Thus, DR(+) 38(+) CD4(+) T cells in lymph nodes have elevated CCR5 expression, are highly susceptible to infection with R5-tropic virus, and produce the majority of R5-tropic HIV-1. PBMC assays failed to recapitulate in vivo findings, suggesting limited utility. Strategies to reduce numbers of DR(+) 38(+) CD4(+) T cells may substantially inhibit HIV-1 replication.     

The alpha5beta1 integrin selectively enhances epidermal growth factor signaling to the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt pathway in intestinal epithelial cells

We have investigated EGF-driven signaling processes in rat intestinal epithelial cell lines that overexpress either the alpha5beta1 integrin or the alpha2beta1 integrin. Both cell types display efficient activation of Erk/MAP kinase, but only the alpha5beta1 expressing cells display a strong activation of Akt. A complex is formed between activated EGFR and alpha5beta1, but not with alpha2beta1; this complex also contains ErbB3 and p85. Thus alpha5beta1 can support efficient activation of both the Erk and the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt branches of the EGFR signaling cascade, whereas alpha2beta1 can support only the Erk branch.     

Two HIV-1 Variants Resistant to Small Molecule CCR5 Inhibitors Differ in How They Use CCR5 for Entry

HIV-1 variants resistant to small molecule CCR5 inhibitors recognize the inhibitor-CCR5 complex, while also interacting with free CCR5. The most common genetic route to resistance involves sequence changes in the gp120 V3 region, a pathway followed when the primary isolate CC1/85 was cultured with the AD101 inhibitor in vitro, creating the CC101.19 resistant variant. However, the D1/86.16 escape mutant contains no V3 changes but has three substitutions in the gp41 fusion peptide. By using CCR5 point-mutants and gp120-targeting agents, we have investigated how infectious clonal viruses derived from the parental and both resistant isolates interact with CCR5. We conclude that the V3 sequence changes in CC101.19 cl.7 create a virus with an increased dependency on interactions with the CCR5 N-terminus. Elements of the CCR5 binding site associated with the V3 region and the CD4-induced (CD4i) epitope cluster in the gp120 bridging sheet are more exposed on the native Env complex of CC101.19 cl.7, which is sensitive to neutralization via these epitopes. However, D1/86.16 cl.23 does not have an increased dependency on the CCR5 N-terminus, and its CCR5 binding site has not become more exposed. How this virus interacts with the inhibitor-CCR5 complex remains to be understood.     

Cenicriviroc,a Novel CCR5 (R5) and CCR2 Antagonist,Shows In Vitro Activity against R5 Tropic HIV-2 Clinical Isolates

Background

Maraviroc activity against HIV-2, a virus naturally resistant to different HIV-1 antiretroviral drugs, has been recently demonstrated. The aim of this study was to assess HIV-2 susceptibility to cenicriviroc, a novel, once-daily, dual CCR5 and CCR2 antagonist that has completed Phase 2b development in HIV-1 infection.

Methods

Cenicriviroc phenotypic activity has been tested using a PBMC phenotypic susceptibility assay against four R5-, one X4- and one dual-tropic HIV-2 clinical primary isolates. All isolates were obtained by co-cultivation of PHA-activated PBMC from distinct HIV-2-infected CCR5-antagonist-naïve patients included in the French HIV-2 cohort and were previously tested for maraviroc susceptibility using the same protocol. HIV-2 tropism was determined by phenotypic assay using Ghost(3) cell lines.

Results

Regarding the 4 R5 HIV-2 clinical isolates tested, effective concentration 50% EC₅₀ for cenicriviroc were 0.03, 0.33, 0.45 and 0.98 nM, similar to those observed with maraviroc: 1.13, 0.58, 0.48 and 0.68 nM, respectively. Maximum percentages of inhibition (MPI) of cenicriviroc were 94, 94, 93 and 98%, similar to those observed with maraviroc (93, 90, 82, 100%, respectively). The dual- and X4-tropic HIV-2 strains were resistant to cenicriviroc with EC50 >1000 nM and MPI at 33% and 4%, respectively.

Conclusions

In this first study assessing HIV-2 susceptibility to cenicriviroc, we observed an in vitro activity against HIV-2 R5-tropic strains similar to that observed with maraviroc. Thus, cenicriviroc may offer a once-daily treatment opportunity in the limited therapeutic arsenal for HIV-2. Clinical studies are warranted.     

Role for CCR5Delta32 protein in resistance to R5, R5X4, and X4 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in primary CD4+ cells

CCR5Delta32 is a loss-of-function mutation that abolishes cell surface expression of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coreceptor CCR5 and provides genetic resistance to HIV infection and disease progression. Since CXCR4 and other HIV coreceptors also exist, we hypothesized that CCR5Delta32-mediated resistance may be due not only to the loss of CCR5 function but also to a gain-of-function mechanism, specifically the active inhibition of alternative coreceptors by the mutant CCR5Delta32 protein. Here we demonstrate that efficient expression of the CCR5Delta32 protein in primary CD4(+) cells by use of a recombinant adenovirus (Ad5/Delta32) was able to down-regulate surface expression of both wild-type CCR5 and CXCR4 and to confer broad resistance to R5, R5X4, and X4 HIV type 1 (HIV-1). This may be important clinically, since we found that CD4(+) cells purified from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of individuals who were homozygous for CCR5Delta32, which expressed the mutant protein endogenously, consistently expressed lower levels of CXCR4 and showed less susceptibility to X4 HIV-1 isolates than cells from individuals lacking the mutation. Moreover, CD4(+) cells from individuals who were homozygous for CCR5Delta32 expressed the mutant protein in five of five HIV-exposed, uninfected donors tested but not in either of two HIV-infected donors tested. The mechanism of inhibition may involve direct scavenging, since we were able to observe a direct interaction of CCR5 and CXCR4 with CCR5Delta32, both by genetic criteria using the yeast two-hybrid system and by biochemical criteria using the coimmunoprecipitation of heterodimers. Thus, these results suggest that at least two distinct mechanisms may account for genetic resistance to HIV conferred by CCR5Delta32: the loss of wild-type CCR5 surface expression and the generation of CCR5Delta32 protein, which functions as a scavenger of both CCR5 and CXCR4.     

Inhibition of Dual/Mixed Tropic HIV-1 Isolates by CCR5-Inhibitors in Primary Lymphocytes and Macrophages

Background

Dual/mixed-tropic HIV-1 strains are predominant in a significant proportion of patients, though little information is available regarding their replication-capacity and susceptibility against CCR5-antagonists in-vitro. The aim of the study was to analyze the replication-capacity and susceptibility to maraviroc of HIV-1 clinical isolates with different tropism characteristics in primary monocyte-derived-macrophages (MDM), peripheral-blood-mononuclear-cells (PBMC), and CD4⁺T-lymphocytes.

Methods

Twenty-three HIV-1 isolates were phenotipically and genotipically characterized as R5, X4 or dual (discriminated as R5⁺/X4, R5/X4, R5/X4⁺). Phenotypic-tropism was evaluated by multiple-cycles-assay on U87MG-CD4⁺-CCR5⁺−/CXCR4⁺-expressing cells. Genotypic-tropism prediction was obtained using Geno2Pheno-algorithm (false-positive-rate [FPR] = 10%). Replication-capacity and susceptibility to maraviroc were investigated in human-primary MDM, PBMC and CD4⁺T-cells. AMD3100 was used as CXCR4-inhibitor. Infectivity of R5/Dual/X4-viruses in presence/absence of maraviroc was assessed also by total HIV-DNA, quantified by real-time polymerase-chain-reaction.

Results

Among 23 HIV-1 clinical isolates, phenotypic-tropism-assay distinguished 4, 17 and 2 viruses with R5-tropic, dual/mixed-, and X4-tropic characteristics, respectively. Overall, viruses defined as R5⁺/X4-tropic were found with the highest prevalence (10/23, 43.5%). The majority of isolates efficiently replicated in both PBMC and CD4⁺T-cells, regardless of their tropism, while MDM mainly sustained replication of R5- or R5⁺/X4-tropic isolates; strong correlation between viral-replication and genotypic-FPR-values was observed in MDM (rho = 0.710;p-value = 1.4e-4). In all primary cells, maraviroc inhibited viral-replication of isolates not only with pure R5- but also with dual/mixed tropism (mainly R5⁺/X4 and, to a lesser extent R5/X4 and R5/X4⁺). Finally, no main differences by comparing the total HIV-DNA with the p24-production in presence/absence of maraviroc were found.

Conclusions

Maraviroc is effective in-vitro against viruses with dual-characteristics in both MDM and lymphocytes, despite the potential X4-mediated escape. This suggests that the concept of HIV-entry through one of the two coreceptors “separately” may require revision, and that the use of CCR5-antagonists in patients with dual/mixed-tropic viruses may be a therapeutic-option that deserves further investigations in different clinical settings.     

HIV-1 coreceptors CCR5 and CXCR4 both mediate neuronal cell death but CCR5 paradoxically can also contribute to protection

The chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 serve, in addition to CD4, as coreceptors for human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1), and infection with HIV-1 can cause dementia. In brain-derived cells, HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 initiates a signaling cascade that involves p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and leads to neuronal cell death. Using mixed neuronal/glial cultures from rats and mice genetically deficient in one or both HIV coreceptors, we show here that CCR5, CXCR4 or both can mediate HIV/gp120 neurotoxicity depending on the viral strain. Paradoxically, we also found evidence for a CCR5-mediated neuroprotective pathway. We identify protein kinase Akt/PKB as an essential component of this pathway, which can be triggered by the CCR5 agonists macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta and regulated-and-normal-T-cell-expressed-and-secreted. Moreover, these CCR5 ligands prevent neuronal cell death induced by stromal cell-derived factor-1, a CXCR4 agonist. Both neurons and glia coexpress CXCR4 and CCR5. Ca2+ imaging experiments demonstrate that engagement of CCR5 prevents CXCR4-triggered increases in intracellular free Ca2+. This finding suggests that CCR5 ligands can protect neurons at least, in part, by modulating CXCR4-mediated toxicity through heterologous desensitization.     

CCR5-reactive antibodies in seronegative partners of HIV-seropositive individuals down-modulate surface CCR5 in vivo and neutralize the infectivity of R5 strains of HIV-1 In vitro

Exposure to HIV does not necessarily result in infection. Because primary HIV infection is associated with CCR5-tropic HIV variants (R5), CCR5-specific Abs in the sera of HIV-seronegative, HIV-exposed individuals (ESN) might be associated with protection against infection. We analyzed sera from ESN, their HIV-infected sexual partners (HIV+), and healthy controls (USN) searching for CCR5-specific Abs, studying whether incubation of PBMC with sera could prevent macrophage inflammatory protein 1 beta (Mip1 beta) (natural ligand of CCR5) binding to CCR5. Results showed that Mip1 beta binding to CCR5 was not modified by sera of either 40 HIV+ or 45 USN but was greatly reduced by sera of 6/48 ESN. Binding inhibition was due to Abs reactive with CCR5. The CCR5-specific Abs neutralized the infectivity of primary HIV isolates obtained from the corresponding HIV+ partners and of R5-primary HIV strains, but not that of CXCR4-tropic or amphitropic HIV strains. Immunoadsorption on CCR5-transfected, but not on CXCR4-transfected, cells removed CCR5-specific and virus-neutralizing Abs. Epitope mapping on purified CCR5-specific Abs showed that these Abs recognize a conformational epitope in the first cysteine loop of CCR5 (aa 89-102). Affinity-purified anti-CCR5-peptide neutralized the infectivity of R5 strains of HIV-1. Anti-CCR5 Abs inhibited Mip1beta-induced chemotaxis of PBMC from healthy donors. PBMC from two ESN (with anti-CCR5 Abs) were CCR5-negative and could not be stimulated by Mip1beta in chemotaxis assays. These results contribute to clarifying the phenomenon of immunologic resistance to HIV and may have implications for the development of a protective vaccine.