The histone chaperone Asf1 increases the rate of histone eviction at the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 promoters

Eukaryotic gene expression starts off from a largely obstructive chromatin substrate that has to be rendered accessible by regulated mechanisms of chromatin remodeling. The yeast PHO5 promoter is a well known example for the contribution of positioned nucleosomes to gene repression and for extensive chromatin remodeling in the course of gene induction. Recently, the mechanism of this remodeling process was shown to lead to the disassembly of promoter nucleosomes and the eviction of the constituent histones in trans. This finding called for a histone acceptor in trans and thus made histone chaperones likely to be involved in this process. In this study we have shown that the histone chaperone Asf1 increases the rate of histone eviction at the PHO5 promoter. In the absence of Asf1 histone eviction is delayed, but the final outcome of the chromatin transition is not affected. The same is true for the coregulated PHO8 promoter where induction also leads to histone eviction and where the rate of histone loss is reduced in asf1 strains as well, although less severely. Importantly, the final extent of chromatin remodeling is not affected. We have also presented evidence that Asf1 and the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex work in distinct parallel but functionally overlapping pathways, i.e. they both contribute toward the same outcome without being mutually strictly dependent.     

Removal of positioned nucleosomes from the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction releases additional upstream activating DNA elements.

The chromatin fine structure in the promoter region of PHO5, the structural gene for a strongly regulated acid phosphatase in yeast, was analyzed. An upstream activating sequence 367 bp away from the start of the coding sequence that is essential for gene induction was found to reside in the center of a hypersensitive region under conditions of PHO5 repression. Under these conditions three related elements at positions -469, -245 and -185 are contained within precisely positioned nucleosomes located on both sides of the hypersensitive region. Upon PHO5 induction the chromatin structure of the promoter undergoes a defined transition, in the course of which two nucleosomes upstream and two nucleosomes downstream of the hypersensitive site are selectively removed. In this way approximately 600 bp upstream of the PHO5 coding sequence become highly accessible and all four elements are free to interact with putative regulatory proteins. These findings suggest a mechanism by which the chromatin structure participates in the functioning of a regulated promoter.     

Effect of in vivo histone hyperacetylation on the state of chromatin fibers.

We evaluated the contribution of in vivo histone acetylation to the folding of chromatin into its higher-order structures. We have compared high-order folding patterns of hyperacetylated vs. unmodified chromatin in living green monkey kidney cells (CV1 line) using intercalator chloroquine diphospate to induce alterations in the twist of internucleosomal linker DNA. We have shown that histone hyperacetylation induced by antibiotic Trichostatin A significantly alters intercalator-mediated chromatin folding pattern.     

Evidence for histone eviction in trans upon induction of the yeast PHO5 promoter

The yeast PHO5 promoter is a model system for the role of chromatin in eukaryotic gene regulation. Four positioned nucleosomes in the repressed state give way to an extended DNase I hypersensitive site upon induction. Recently this hypersensitive site was shown to be devoid of histone DNA contacts. This raises the mechanistic question of how histones are removed from the promoter. A displacement in trans or movement in cis, the latter according to the well established nucleosome sliding mechanism, are the major alternatives. In this study, we embedded the PHO5 promoter into the context of a small plasmid which severely restricts the space for nucleosome sliding along the DNA in cis. Such a construct would either preclude the chromatin transition upon induction altogether, were it to occur in cis, or gross changes in chromatin around the plasmid would be the consequence. We observed neither. Instead, promoter opening on the plasmid was indistinguishable from opening at the native chromosomal locus. This makes a sliding mechanism for the chromatin transition at the PHO5 promoter highly unlikely and points to histone eviction in trans.     

Nucleosome disruption at the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction occurs in the absence of DNA replication.

Activation of the PHO5 gene in S. cerevisiae by phosphate starvation was previously shown to be accompanied by the disappearance of four positioned nucleosomes from the promoter. To investigate the mechanism, we replaced the PHO80 gene, a negative regulator of PHO5, by a temperature-sensitive allele. As a consequence, PHO5 can be activated in the presence of phosphate by a temperature shift from 24 degrees C to 37 degrees C. Under these conditions, the promoter undergoes the same chromatin transition as in phosphate-starved cells. Disruption of the nucleosomes by the temperature shift also occurs when DNA replication is prevented. Nucleosomes re-form when the temperature is shifted from 37 degrees C back to 24 degrees C in nondividing cells. Glucose is required for the disruption of the nucleosomes during the temperature upshift, not for their re-formation during the temperature downshift. These experiments prove that DNA replication is not required for the transition between the nucleosomal and the non-nucleosomal state at the PHO5 promoter.     

Chromatin remodelling at the PHO8 promoter requires SWI-SNF and SAGA at a step subsequent to activator binding

The SWI-SNF and SAGA complexes possess ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling activity and histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity, respectively. Mutations that eliminate the ATPase activity of the SWI-SNF complex, or the HAT activity of SAGA, abolish proper chromatin remodelling at the PHO8 promoter in vivo. These effects are mechanistically distinct, since the absence of SWI-SNF freezes chromatin in the repressed state, while the absence of Gcn5 permits a localized perturbation of chromatin structure immediately adjacent to the upstream transactivator binding site. However, this remodelling is not propagated to the proximal promoter, and no activation is observed under all conditions. Furthermore, Pho4 is bound to the PHO8 promoter in the absence of Snf2 or Gcn5, confirming a role for SWI-SNF and SAGA in chromatin remodelling independent of activator binding. These data provide new insights into the roles of the SWI-SNF and SAGA complexes in chromatin remodelling in vivo.     

A functional role for nucleosomes in the repression of a yeast promoter.

Induction of the PHO5 gene in S. cerevisiae was previously shown to be accompanied by the removal of four positioned nucleosomes from the promoter. In order to assess the role of nucleosomes in the cascade of gene activation, DNA corresponding to one of these nucleosomes was excised. In its place two foreign DNA segments of the same length were inserted: a fragment from the African green monkey alpha-satellite DNA which is known to associate with histones in a highly specific fashion to give a uniquely positioned nucleosome or, alternatively, a fragment derived from pBR322 DNA. The promoter constructs were fused to the lacZ gene on centromere plasmids and transformed into yeast cells. The satellite fragment formed a nucleosome which persisted under inducing conditions. At the same time the inducibility of the PHO5 promoter was virtually abolished. When various subfragments containing between 35 and 100 bp of the satellite segment were tested, they were all found to decrease the inducibility of the promoter, full repression required the full length molecule, however. In contrast, the pBR fragment made the promoter weakly constitutive, and induction proceeded to levels even higher than with a promoter lacking an insert. Analysis of the chromatin structure reveals a nucleosome on the pBR segment at noninducing conditions which is removed upon induction. It is concluded that the quality of the histone-DNA interactions at the promoter makes an intrinsic contribution to the regulation of the gene.     

Nuclease hypersensitive regions with adjacent positioned nucleosomes mark the gene boundaries of the PHO5/PHO3 locus in yeast.

The chromatin structure of two tandemly linked acid phosphatase genes (PHO5 and PHO3) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae was analyzed under conditions at which the strongly regulated PHO5 gene is repressed. Digestion experiments with DNase I, DNase II, micrococcal nuclease and restriction nucleases reveal the presence of five hypersensitive sites at the PHO5/PHO3 locus, two of them upstream of PHO5 at distances of 920 and 370 bp, one in between the two genes and two downstream of PHO3. Specifically positioned nucleosomes are located next to these hypersensitive sites as shown by indirect end-labeling experiments. The positions deduced from these experiments could be verified by monitoring the accessibility of various restriction sites to the respective nucleases. Sites within putative linker regions were about 50-60% susceptible, whereas sites located within nucleosome cores were resistant. Hybridizing micrococcal nuclease digests to a probe from in between the two upstream hypersensitive sites leads to an interruption of an otherwise regular nucleosomal DNA pattern. This shows directly that these hypersensitive sites represent gaps within ordered nucleosomal arrays.     

Genetic analysis implicates the Set3/Hos2 histone deacetylase in the deposition and remodeling of nucleosomes containing H2A.Z

Histone variants and histone modification complexes act to regulate the functions of chromatin. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the histone variant H2A.Z is encoded by HTZ1. Htz1 is dispensable for viability in budding yeast, but htz1Δ is synthetic sick or lethal with the null alleles of about 200 nonessential genes. One of the strongest of these interactions is with the deletion of SET3, which encodes a subunit of the Set3/Hos2 histone deacetylase complex. Little is known about the functions of Set3, and interpreting these genetic interactions remains a highly challenging task. Here we report the results of a forward genetic screen to identify bypass suppressors of the synthetic slow-growth phenotype of htz1Δ set3Δ. Among the identified loss-of-function suppressors are genes encoding subunits of the HDA1 deacetylase complex, the SWR1 complex, the H2B deubiquitination module of SAGA, the proteasome, Set1, and Sir3. This constellation of suppressor genes is uncommon among the global set of htz1Δ synthetic interactions. BDF1, AHC1, RMR1, and CYC8 were identified as high-copy suppressors. We also identified interactions with SLX5 and SLX8, encoding the sumoylation-targeted ubiquitin ligase complex. In the context of htz1Δ set3Δ, suppressors in the SWR1 and the H2B deubiquitination complexes show strong functional similarity, as do suppressors in the silencing genes and the proteasome. Surprisingly, while both htz1Δ set3Δ and swr1Δ set3Δ have severe slow-growth phenotypes, the htz1Δ swr1Δ set3Δ triple mutant grows relatively well. We propose that Set3 has previously unrecognized functions in the dynamic deposition and remodeling of nucleosomes containing H2A.Z.