Recent data on intratumor estrogens in breast cancer

The contribution of local synthesis versus circulatory delivery of normal breast as well as breast cancer tissue estrogens has remained a controversial area for decades. Novel data on tissue estrogen levels confirm a positive normal breast tissue to plasma concentration gradient for estrone, and to a smaller extent estradiol. Remarkably, this gradient is similar for pre- and post-menopausal women. Together with pharmacokinetic data on estrogen disposition, these findings suggest plasma and breast tissue estrogens to rapidly equilibrate, with circulating estrogens being a major contributor to breast tissue estrone levels. A likely explanation to the concentration gradient could be the fact that non-polar estrogens easily dissolve into tissue fat compartments as compared to plasma. While intratumor estrone levels are low as compared to benign tissue concentrations, intratumor estradiol is elevated in ER+ tumors. The correlation between intratumor estradiol levels and expression levels of dehydrogenases reducing estrone into estradiol but also intratumor ER concentrations are consistent with intratumor estrogen activation but also a scavenger effect of the ER.     

Breast cancer tissue estrogens and their manipulation with aromatase inhibitors and inactivators

Despite the dramatic fall in plasma estrogen levels at menopause, only minor differences in breast tissue estrogen levels have been reported comparing pre- and postmenopausal women. Thus, postmenopausal breast tissue has the ability to maintain concentrations of estrone (E₁) and estradiol (E₂) that are 2–10- and 10–20-fold higher than the corresponding plasma estrogen levels. This finding may be explained by uptake of estrogens from the circulation and/or local estrogen production. Local aromatase activity in breast tissue seems to be of crucial importance for the local estrogen production in some patients while uptake from the circulation may be more important in other patients. Beside aromatase, breast tissue expresses estrogen sulfotransferase and sulfatase as well as dehydrogenase activity, allowing estrogen storage and release in the cells as well as conversions between estrone and estradiol. The activity of the enzyme network in breast cancer tissue is modified by a variety of factors like growth factors and cytokines. Aromatase inhibitors have been used for more than two decades in the treatment of postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer and are currently investigated in the adjuvant treatment and even prevention of breast cancer. Novel aromatase inhibitors and inactivators have been shown to suppress plasma estrogen levels effectively in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. However, knowledge about the influence of these drugs on estrogen levels in breast cancer tissue is limited. Using a novel HPLC-RIA method developed for the determination of breast tissue estrogen concentrations, we measured tissue E₁, E₂ and estrone sulfate (E₁S) levels in postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during treatment with anastrozole. Our findings revealed high breast tumor tissue estrogen concentrations that were effectively decreased by anastrozole. While E₁S was the dominating estrogen fraction in the plasma, estradiol was the estrogen fraction with the highest concentration in tumor tissue. Moreover, plasma estrogen levels did not correlate with tissue estrogen concentrations. The overall experience with aromatase inhibitors and inactivators concerning their influences on breast tissue estrogen concentrations is summarized.     

Comparison between aromatase inhibitors and sequential use

The biochemical efficacy of aromatase inhibitors and inactivators in vivo may be determined by two types of methods; by measuring plasma or tissue estrogen levels, or assessment of the conversion of the androgen substrate (in practice, androstenedione) into estrogens (estrone) by the use of tracer methods. While methods to determine plasma and tissue estrogens are limited through lack of sensitivity required to measure the very low concentrations recorded in postmenopausal women on treatment with these compounds, measurement of in vivo aromatization is an extensive procedure, applicable to a limited number of patients only. While we may correlate the mean level of aromatase inhibition achieved with different compounds to clinical efficacy, data correlating individual estrogen suppression to clinical outcome among patients treated with a specific compound is limited. The now well-characterized phenomenon of lack of cross-resistance between non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors and steroidal aromatase inactivators are likely due to biochemical effects not related to differences in total body aromatase inhibition.     

Postmenopausal estrogen synthesis and metabolism: alterations caused by aromatase inhibitors used for the treatment of breast cancer

Inhibition of postmenopausal estrogen production by aromatase inhibitors is an established drug treatment modality for postmenopausal breast cancer. In this article postmenopausal estrogen disposition and the alterations caused by treatment with aromatase inhibitors are reviewed. Recent investigations have challenged the hypothesis that aromatization of androstenedione into estrone is the sole production pathway for estrogens in postmenopausal women. The finding that estrogens persist in the plasma of patients receiving aminoglutethimide treatment despite a near total inhibition of the aromatase enzyme suggests that alternative pathways for estrogen synthesis exist. While nonspecific actions of aromatase inhibitors may be disadvantageous, certain effects may also be beneficial. Recent findings that aminoglutethimide may induce estrone sulfate metabolism questions whether this "prototype" aromatase inhibitor might have a dual mechanism of action. The importance of investigating the possible influence of different aromatase inhibitors on all components of estrogen disposition is considered.     

Intratumoral levels of estrogens in breast cancer

Breast cancer tissue is an endocrine organ and particularly the estrogen biosynthetic properties of this tissue have been well studied. The concentration of estradiol in breast cancer tissue from postmenopausal patients is considerably higher than that in the circulation and appears to depend largely on local production. Androgenic precursor steroids are abundantly present, but estrogen storage pools like fatty acid derivatives appear to be less important than initially thought. New, potent and highly specific aromatase inhibitors effectively inhibit peripheral conversion of androgens to estrogens (Cancer Res. 53: 4563, 1993) as well as intratumour aromatase, median aromatase activity being 89% lower in the tissue from patients pretreated with aromatase inhibitor 7 days prior to surgery (P<0.001). Also the intratissue concentrations of estrogens were decreased (64% and 80% reduction, respectively for estrone and estradiol; P=0.001 and <0.05; Cancer Res. 57: 2109, 1997). These results illustrate that intratissue estrogen biosynthesis is effectively inhibited by the new generation of aromatase inhibitors. The pathophysiological consequences of this finding are currently under study.     

Lack of inhibition of placental estrone sulfatase and aromatase enzymes by vitamin D3 and its analogs

The aromatase and estrone sulfatase enzymes are important sources of biologically active estrogens in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Promising initial results in the treatment of endocrine-responsive breast cancer have been exhibited by 125-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ and the synthetic vitamin D analogues MC903 and EB1089. However, these compounds together with vitamin D₃ and vitamin D₃ sulfate did not inhibit the human placental aromatase enzyme when assayed up to 20 μm. Only vitamin D₃ sulfate and 125-dihydroxyvitamin D inhibited the estrone sulfatase activity in human placental microsomes, albeit at high concentration (32 and 37% inhibition, respectively with 50 μm each inhibitor). It is unlikely that inhibition of aromatase or estrone sulfatase enzymes contribute to the inhibitory effect of this group of compounds on breast cancer cells in vivo.     

Plasma estrogen suppression with aromatase inhibitors evaluated by a novel, sensitive assay for estrone sulphate

Aromatase inhibition is a well-defined treatment option for postmenopausal breast cancer. Although several aromatase inhibitors such as aminoglutethimide, formestane, fadrozole have been found to inhibit in vivo aromatization by>85%, previous studies reported plasma estrogen levels to be sustained at approximately 20–50% of their control level during treatment with these drugs. The discrepancy could be due to lack of sensitivity or non-specific crossreactions in the radioimmunoassay (RIA) methods. Mean plasma levels of estrone (E₁) and estradiol (E₂) in postmenopausal women are approximately 80 and 20 pmol/l, respectively; on the contrary, mean plasma levels of the estrogen conjugate estrone sulphate (E₁S) are approximately 4–500 pmol/l. Most RIA methods for plasma E₂ and E₁ measurements have sensitivity limits in the range of 2–3 and 7–10 pmol/l, respectively; accordingly, the suppression of plasma estrogens by more than 80–90% will produce hormone values below the sensitivity limit of the method in many patients. Recently, we developed a new method to determine plasma E₁S. This assay has a sensitivity limit of 2.7 pmol/l. In theory, this method may allow the determination of plasma E₁S levels suppressed to less than 2% of control values in the majority of patients. Using this method, we found different aromatase inhibitors such as formestane, aminoglutethimide, formestane and aminoglutethimide administered in concert or anastrozole to suppress plasma E₁S levels down to 24, 13, 7 and 4%, respectively. The suppression of plasma E₁S evaluated with this method thus approaches the percentage aromatase inhibition measured with tracer studies.     

Endocrine effects of aromatase inhibitors and inactivators in vivo: review of data and method limitations

The so-called “third-generation” aromatase inhibitors/inactivators have become standard first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women in the metastatic setting. In addition, these compounds, administered as monotherapy or in sequence with tamoxifen, are likely to become standard adjuvant therapy in most countries in the near future. In contrast to the SERMs, aromatase inhibitors may be assessed for their biochemical efficacy in vivo either by measuring their ability to suppress plasma and tissue estrogen levels or, alternatively, by measuring their ability to inhibit the conversion of tracer-labelled androstenedione into estrone. While contemporary methods for estrogen measurement (with the exception of estrone sulphate) lack the sensitivity to measure plasma estrogen levels during treatment with the most potent compounds, in vivo aromatase inhibition can be determined with a much better sensitivity. Thus, in a joint program conducted by the Royal Marsden Hospital, London and our team in Bergen, we were able to reveal profound differences between first- and second-generation aromatase inhibitors, causing 50–90% aromatase inhibition, and the three third-generation compounds, causing >98% inhibition of total body aromatization.     

Total body aromatization in postmenopausal breast cancer patients is strongly correlated to plasma leptin levels

The adipocytokine leptin has recently been shown to enhance the expression of aromatase via promoter II and I.3 using an AP-1 motif. Thus, we evaluated the correlation between plasma leptin concentrations and total body aromatization (TBA) as well as plasma levels of estrone (E(1)), estradiol (E(2)) and estrone sulfate (E(1)S) in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Twenty-two postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, participating in tracer studies for the measurement of total body aromatization (TBA) in vivo, were available. In addition, blood samples for plasma estrogens and leptin measurements were available from another 22 breast cancer patients and 114 healthy postmenopausal women participating in the mammography-screening program. Values for TBA varied from 1.46 to 4.72% while plasma leptin levels ranged from 1.83 to 95.51 ng/ml in the same group of patients. All plasma estrogen levels were in the normal range expected for postmenopausal women. We found a significant correlation between pretreatment leptin levels and TBA (r(s) 0.452, P=0.01). In contrast, basal levels of TBA did not correlate to body mass index (BMI) in the same group of patients. Plasma leptin levels correlated to plasma levels of estradiol (r(s) 0.659, P=0.007), and estrone sulfate (r(s) 0.562, P=0.01) in the group of breast cancer patients (n=44) as well as in the group of healthy postmenopausal women (estradiol, r(s) 0.363, P< or =0.001, estrone sulfate r(s) 0.353, P< or =0.001). In conclusion, we found plasma leptin levels to correlate to TBA in breast cancer patients and to plasma levels of estradiol and estrone sulfate in breast cancer patients as well as in healthy postmenopausal females. These findings suggest that leptin may influence on aromatase activity in vivo, providing a possible link between body weight and plasma estrogen levels as well as breast cancer risk.     

Effect of androstenedione on growth of untransfected and aromatase-transfected MCF-7 cells in culture

Aromatase is present in human breast tumors and in breast cancer cell lines suggesting the possibility of in-situ estrogen production via the androstenedione to estrone and estradiol pathway. However, proof of the biologic relevance of aromatase in breast cancer tissue requires the demonstration that this enzyme mediates biologic effects on cell proliferation. Accordingly, we studied the effects of the aromatase substrate, androstenedione, on the rate of proliferation of wild-type and aromatase-transfected MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Androstenedione did not increase cell growth in wild-type MCF-7 cells which contained relatively low aromatase activity and produced 4-fold more estrone than estradiol. In contrast, aromatase-transfected cell contained higher amounts of aromatase, produced predominantly estradiol, and responded to androstenedione with enhanced growth. An aromatase inhibitor fadrozole hydrochloride, blocked the proliferative effects of androstenedione providing evidence for the role of aromatase in this process. As further evidence of the requirement for aromatase, cells transfected with the neomycin resistance expression plasmid but lacking the aromatase cDNA did not respond to androstenedione. These studies provide evidence that aromatase may have a biologic role for in-situ synthesis of estrogens of breast cancer tissue.     

Clinical development of aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of breast and prostate cancer

Numerous aromatase inhibitors are under development for breast cancer treatment. The major aims are to obtain a drug which at its dose of maximum efficacy has no effect on other endocrine systems, has no clinical side-effects and its convenient to administer. During the early clinical stages of development detailed endocrine and pharmacokinetic analyses are a valuable aid in the establishment of a drug's selectivity and its optimum dose, route and frequency of administration. The optimal dose may be defined as the minimum that will achieve maximal and sustained suppression of aromatase activity. This has generally been measured indirectly by comparing the suppression of plasma oestrogen levels at a selection of dosages. This approach has major advantages in speeding dose selection for therapeutic clinical trials. However, it also has some disadvantages including the unproven assumption that clinical response has a direct relationship with the degree of oestrogen suppression. In addition there are technical difficulties of analysis, of wide variability in endocrine response between patients and of demonstrating oestrogen suppression to be equivalent between doses (necessary to show maximal suppression). The direct measurement of aromatase inhibition in vivo by isotopic infusion analysis provides support to these indirect estimates. Its value is shown by our recent results with CGS16949A. The additional value of collating pharmacokinetic and endocrine measurements is apparent from our investigations of 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) and pyridoglutethimide. A consideration of our experience with these inhibitors may be helpful in directing the development of future agents.

Whilst the value of aromatase inhibition in breast cancer is established its value in prostatic cancer is in doubt: we have found that 4-OHA is only poorly efficacious in advanced prostatic cancer.     

Aromatase and other inhibitors in breast and prostatic cancer

Estrogens have an important role in the growth of breast and other hormone-sensitive cancers. We have shown that 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) selectively blocks estrogen synthesis by inhibiting aromatase activity in ovarian and peripheral tissues and reduces plasma estrogen levels in rat and non-human primate species. In postmenopausal men and women, estrogens are mainly of peripheral origin. When postmenopausal breast cancer patients were administered either by daily oral or parenteral weekly treatment with 4-OHA, plasma estrogen concentrations were significantly reduced. Complete or partial response to treatment occurred in 34% of 100 patients with advanced breast cancer, while the disease was stabilized in 12%. We recently studied the effects of 4-OHA and other aromatase inhibitors, 10-propargylestr-4-ene-3,17-dione (PED) and imidazo[1,5-]3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrin-6-yl-(4-benzonitrile) (CGS 16949A) as well as 5-reductase inhibitors, N,N-diethyl-4-methyl-3-oxo-4-aza-5-androstane-17β-carboxyamide (4-MA) and 17β-hydroxy-4-aza-4-methyl-19norandrost-5-en-3-one (L651190) in prostatic tissue from 11 patients with prostatic cancer and six patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), and from normal men at autopsy. We attempted to measure aromatase activity in tissue incubation by quantitating ³H₂O released during aromatization of androstenedione or testosterone labeled at the C-1 position. The amount of ³H₂O released from all samples was at least twice that of the heat inactivated tissue samples. The ³H₂O release was significantly inhibited by 4-OHA and 4-MA, but not by the other aromatase inhibitors. However, when HPLC and TLC were used to isolate steroid products, no estrone or estradiol was detected in the incubates. Furthermore, no aromatase mRNA was detected following amplification by PCR. The 4-OHA was found to inhibit 5-reductase in both BPH and cancer tissue, although to a lesser extent than 4-MA. The other aromatase inhibitors were without effect. Although a mechanism involving intraprostatic aromatase is not likely, inhibitors may act to reduce peripherally-formed estrogens. In postmenopausal breast cancer, the results indicate that 4-OHA is of significant benefit.     

Role of steroid sulfatase in local formation of estrogen in post-menopausal breast cancer patients

More than two-thirds of breast cancers occur in post-menopausal women, and depend on the estrogens for their proliferation and survival. For the treatment of estrogen-dependent breast cancers, two major treatment options are now available. One is selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) such as Tamoxifen and another is aromatase inhibitor such as Anastrozole, Letrozole and Exemestane, which reduce local in situ formation of estrogens. Although these therapies are clinically active for advanced and early breast cancers, de novo and/or acquired resistance to SERM and/or aromatase inhibitors are also clinical problem. Recent studies suggest that local formation of estrogens in the breast tumors is more important than circulating estrogen in plasma for the growth and survival of estrogen-dependent breast cancer in post-menopausal women. The rationale for the importance of local formation of estrogens is based on the following evidences. Estradiol (E2) levels in breast tumors are equivalent to those of pre-menopausal patients, although plasma E2 levels are 50-fold lower after menopause. E2 concentrations in breast tumors of post-menopausal women are 10–40 times higher than serum level. Biosynthesis of estrogens in breast tumors tissues occurs via two major different routes, one is aromatase pathway and another is steroid-sulfatase (STS) pathway. Whereas many studies has been reported about aromatase inhibitor and its clinical trial results in breast cancer patients, limited information are available regarding to other estrogen regulating enzymes including STS, its role in breast tumors and STS inhibitors. STS is the enzyme that hydrolyses estrone 3-sulfate (E₁S) and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEA-S) to their active un-sulfoconjugated forms, thereby stimulating the growth and survival of estrogen-dependent breast tumors. It has been well known that E₁S level are much higher than E2 level both in plasma and tumor of post-menopausal patients. Recent reports show that more than 80% of breast tumors are stained with anti-STS antibody and the expression of STS is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. Taking these findings into consideration, local formation of estrogens could be partially synthesized from large amount of E₁S by STS, which exist in breast cancer. On the other hand, aromatase localizes in stroma and adipocyte surrounding breast cancer. Furthermore, since estrogen formation from E₁S and DHEA-S (STS pathway) cannot be blocked by aromatase inhibitors, STS is thought to be a new molecular target for the treatment of estrogen-dependent tumor post-SERM and/or aromatase inhibitors. In this symposium, these recent rationale for the importance of STS in post-menopausal breast cancer patients is reviewed as well as STS inhibitor.     

Recent progress in development of aromatase inhibitors

In postmenopausal women with breast cancer, aromatase, which is the enzyme converting androstenedione to estrone and testosterone to estradiol, is the rate-limiting step in estrogen biosynthesis. The currently available aromatase inhibitor, aminogluethimide, effectively blocks estrogen production and produces tumor regressions in patients previously treated with tamoxifen. This drug, however, produces frequent side effects and blocks steroidogenic steps other than the aromatase enzyme. Thus, newer aromatase inhibitors with greater potency and specificity are under intense study. More than 20 such compounds have recently been developed. In several clinical trials, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione, given parenterally, has been highly active and specific for aromatase inhibition in patients with breast cancer. In two large recent studies, one-third of heavily pretreated women experienced objective tumor regression with this therapy. CGS 16949A, a newer agent, is also Phase II clinical trials. This compound is an imidazole derivative with nearly 1000-fold greater potency than aminoglutethimide. An initial Phase I study compared the potency of 0.6–16 mg daily in 12 postmenopausal women and found maximal suppression of urinary and plasma estrogens with 2 mg daily. The degree of inhibition was similar to that induced by aminoglutethimide or by surgical adrenalectomy. No CNS, hematologic or biochemical toxicity was observed. A larger Phase II study in 54 patients confirmed this high degree of potency of CGS since a plateau effect was observed at the 1.8, 2 and 4 mg daily doses. The endocrine effects were not absolutely specific as a blunting of ACTH-stimulated but not basal aldosterone levels were observed. This and other emerging aromatase inhibitors offer promise as pharmacologic methods to inhibit estrogen production specifically and without side effects.     

The efficacy of CGS 20267 in suppressing estrogen biosynthesis in patients with advanced stage breast cancer

The pharmacologic inhibition of aromatase activity has been the focus of clinical trials in patients with advanced stage breast cancer. Recent developments with imidazole compounds that inhibit aromatase activity suggest their clinical use as potent inhibitors of estrogen biosynthesis in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. In this Phase I, open-label, dose-range finding study, we examined the inhibitory potency of CGS 20267 on blood and urine levels of estradiol, estrone and estrone sulfate in 8 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Studies included evaluation of adrenal and thyroid function to look for evidence of general hydroxylase inhibition at dose levels effective for aromatase blockade. Patients were administered CGS 20267 at doses of 0.1 and 0.25 mg, once a day in ascending doses over a 12-week period. Preliminary data reveal that CGS 20267 elicits a striking suppression in plasma estradiol, estrone and estrone sulphate which was observed in some patients as quickly as within 24 h of the first dose. Estrogen suppression of over 90% was achieved within 2 weeks of therapy. No alterations in either baseline or ACTH (cortrosyn) stimulated cortisol and aldosterone levels were observed through the 12 weeks of therapy. In addition, 24 h urine sodium and potassium values were not appreciably altered during therapy. We conclude that CGS 20267 is a potent, specific inhibitor of estrogen biosynthesis in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer and effectively reduces blood and urine estrogens to undetectable levels.     

Highly selective inhibition of estrogen biosynthesis by CGS 20267, a new non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor

CGS 20267 is a new non-steroidal compound which potently inhibits aromatase in vitro (IC₅₀ of 11.5 nM) and in vivo (ED₅₀ of 1–3 μg/kg p.o.). CGS 20267 maximally inhibits estradiol production in vitro in LH-stimulated hamster ovarian tissue at 0.1 μM with an IC₅₀ of 0.02 μM and does not significantly affect progesterone production up to 350 μM. In ACTH-stimulated rat adrenal tissue in vitro, aldosterone production was inhibited with an IC₅₀ of 210 μM (10,000 times higher than the IC₅₀ for estradiol production); no significant effect on corticosterone production was seen at 350 μM. In vivo, in ACTH-treated rats, CGS 20267 does not affect plasma levels of corticosterone or aldosterone at a dose of 4 mg/kg p.o. (1000 times higher than the ED₅₀ for aromatase inhibition in vivo). In adult female rats, a 14-day treatment with 1 mg/kg p.o. daily, completely interrupts ovarian cyclicity and suppresses uterine weight to that seen 14 days after ovariectomy. In adult female rats bearing estrogen-dependent DMBA-induced mammary tumors, 0.1 mg/kg p.o. given daily for 42 days caused almost complete regression of tumors present at the start of treatment. Thus compared to each other, CGS 16949A and CGS 20267 are both highly potent in inhibiting estrogen biosynthesis in vitro and in vivo. The striking difference between them is that unlike CGS 16949A, CGS 20267 does not affect adrenal steroidogenesis in vitro or in vivo, at concentrations and doses several orders of magnitude higher than those required to inhibit estrogen biosynthesis.     

Stepwise estrogen suppression manipulating the estrostat

Estrogen suppression is an effective endocrine treatment option in pre- as well as postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The fact that it produces clinical benefits not only in these two groups of patients that differ significantly with respect to plasma estrogen levels but also among patients with very low plasma estrogen levels due to previous hypophysectomy, adrenalectomy or treatment with first/second generation aromatase inhibitors, suggests estrogen deprivation to work independent of pretreatment plasma estrogen levels. Interestingly, in vitro studies have revealed MCF-7 cells to respond to estrogen deprivation by sensitization, causing maximum estradiol stimulation at a concentration 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁴ the concentration needed in wild-type cells. While results from recent phase III studies comparing novel aromatase inhibitors and inactivators to conventional therapy have suggested that a more effective hormone ablation may be translated into an improved clinical efficacy, the biochemical rationale for lack of complete cross-resistance between aromatase inhibitors and inactivators or aromatase inhibitors and megestrol acetate remains to be explained. Interestingly, patients becoming resistant to estrogen deprivation may still respond to estrogens administered in pharmacological doses. Future studies are warranted to explore alterations in gene expression and signaling mechanisms in response to different therapies in tumor tissue in vivo.     

Aromatase in the normal breast and breast cancer

Adipose tissue and muscle constitute the larger proportion of body mass, and therefore aromatization in these tissues is the major source of circulating estrogens in postmenopausal women. Although plasma estrogen concentrations are very low, levels in breast cancers from postmenopausal patients are reported to be 10-fold higher than in plasma and normal tissue. Whereas studies on aromatase activity in the tumor suggest that estrogen may be produced locally, the significance of this contribution has been questioned. Using immunocytochemistry (ICC) to an anti-aromatase antibody, a relatively strong immunoreaction was detected in tumor epithelial cells as well as in the terminal ductal lobular units (TDLUs) of the normal breast. Aromatase expression was detected in the cytoplasm of tumor epithelial cells and the surrounding stromal cells of over 50% of tumors in a series of 19 breast cancers. In situ hybridization (ISH) to aromatase mRNA confirmed the immunocytochemical result that the epithelial cells are the primary site of estrogen synthesis in the breast and breast cancers. In the 10 tumors which showed immunoreaction to aromatase, the average aromatase activity measured in cryosections was 286.5 ± 18.6 fmol estrogen/mg protein/h (SE), whereas in nine tumors with weak aromatase immunoreaction, the enzyme activity was 154.7 ± 19.3 fmol estrogen/mg protein/h (P < 0.05) (SE). The functional significance of tumor aromatase and locally produced estrogens on the growth of tumors was suggested by the correlation between aromatase activity and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a marker of cell proliferation (P < 0.005). Although intratumoral aromatase activity did not correlate with steroid receptors significantly, there was a trend for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors to express aromatase. In addition, proliferation ([³H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA) during histoculture, was increased by both estradiol and testosterone in tumors with high aromatase activity. Our results suggest that some tumors synthesize sufficient estrogen to stimulate their proliferation. It may thus be important to inhibit tumor aromatase as well as to reduce circulating levels of estrogen for effective breast cancer treatment.     

Hormonal effects of aromatase inhibitors: focus on premenopausal effects and interaction with tamoxifen

Third generation aromatase inhibitors have excellent specificity. Some reports indicate that letrozole may have a minor effect on cortisol synthesis but these were not confirmed: valid comparisons with other aromatase inhibitors requires randomised study.

The putative use of a third generation inhibitor as a single agent in premenopausal women has been investigated using YM511. It was hypothesised that in this situation site-specific suppression of estrogens in breast carcinomas, without systemic effects, may lead to a down-regulation of tumour proliferation. Plasma levels of androstenedione and testosterone were significantly increased by 2 weeks treatment with YM511. Mean plasma estrone levels were suppressed, but some plasma estradiol levels were abnormally high and others abnormally low. These differential effects of YM511 on circulating estrogens supported the concept that peripheral synthesis of estrogens might be suppressed while ovarian production remained high. However, YM511 did not demonstrate anti-proliferative effects in hormone sensitive breast carcinomas.

Consideration of the pharmacology of the estrogen receptor during tamoxifen therapy indicates that tamoxifen effectively saturates the receptor (>99.94% occupancy) in postmenopausal women. The addition of an aromatase inhibitor in this situation would be very unlikely to affect the biological activity of the estrogen receptor. This provides a possible explanation why the clinical efficacy of tamoxifen combined with an aromatase inhibitor appears to be equivalent to that of tamoxifen alone.