Emerging role for nuclear rotation and orientation in cell migration

Nucleus movement, positioning, and orientation is precisely specified and actively regulated within cells, and it plays a critical role in many cellular and developmental processes. Mutation of proteins that regulate the nucleus anchoring and movement lead to diverse pathologies, laminopathies in particular, suggesting that the nucleus correct positioning and movement is essential for proper cellular function. In motile cells that polarize toward the direction of migration, the nucleus undergoes controlled rotation promoting the alignment of the nucleus with the axis of migration. Such spatial organization of the cell appears to be optimal for the cell migration. Nuclear reorientation requires the cytoskeleton to be anchored to the nuclear envelope, which exerts pulling or pushing torque on the nucleus. Here we discuss the possible molecular mechanisms regulating the nuclear rotation and reorientation and the significance of this type of nuclear movement for cell migration.     

Actomyosin Tension Exerted on the Nucleus through Nesprin-1 Connections Influences Endothelial Cell Adhesion, Migration, and Cyclic Strain-Induced Reorientation

Endothelial cell polarization and directional migration is required for angiogenesis. Polarization and motility requires not only local cytoskeletal remodeling but also the motion of intracellular organelles such as the nucleus. However, the physiological significance of nuclear positioning in the endothelial cell has remained largely unexplored. Here, we show that siRNA knockdown of nesprin-1, a protein present in the linker of nucleus to cytoskeleton complex, abolished the reorientation of endothelial cells in response to cyclic strain. Confocal imaging revealed that the nuclear height is substantially increased in nesprin-1 depleted cells, similar to myosin inhibited cells. Nesprin-1 depletion increased the number of focal adhesions and substrate traction while decreasing the speed of cell migration; however, there was no detectable change in nonmuscle myosin II activity in nesprin-1 deficient cells. Together, these results are consistent with a model in which the nucleus balances a portion of the actomyosin tension in the cell. In the absence of nesprin-1, actomyosin tension is balanced by the substrate, leading to abnormal adhesion, migration, and cyclic strain-induced reorientation.     

Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization in migrating cells

The microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) is reoriented between the nucleus and the leading edge in many migrating cells and contributes to directional migration. Models suggest that the MTOC is moved to its position during reorientation. By direct imaging of wound-edge fibroblasts after triggering MTOC reorientation with soluble factors, we found instead that the nucleus moved away from the leading edge to reorient the MTOC, while the MTOC remained stationary. Rearward nuclear movement was coupled with actin retrograde flow and was regulated by a pathway involving Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin. Nuclear movement was unaffected by the inhibition of dynein, Par6, or PKCzeta, yet these components were essential for MTOC reorientation, as they maintained the MTOC at the cell centroid. These results show that nuclear repositioning is an initial polarizing event in migrating cells and that the positions of the nucleus and the MTOC are established by separate regulatory pathways.     

The interaction between nesprins and sun proteins at the nuclear envelope is critical for force transmission between the nucleus and cytoskeleton

Maintaining physical connections between the nucleus and the cytoskeleton is important for many cellular processes that require coordinated movement and positioning of the nucleus. Nucleo-cytoskeletal coupling is also necessary to transmit extracellular mechanical stimuli across the cytoskeleton to the nucleus, where they may initiate mechanotransduction events. The LINC (Linker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton) complex, formed by the interaction of nesprins and SUN proteins at the nuclear envelope, can bind to nuclear and cytoskeletal elements; however, its functional importance in transmitting intracellular forces has never been directly tested. This question is particularly relevant since recent findings have linked nesprin mutations to muscular dystrophy and dilated cardiomyopathy. Using biophysical assays to assess intracellular force transmission and associated cellular functions, we identified the LINC complex as a critical component for nucleo-cytoskeletal force transmission. Disruption of the LINC complex caused impaired propagation of intracellular forces and disturbed organization of the perinuclear actin and intermediate filament networks. Although mechanically induced activation of mechanosensitive genes was normal (suggesting that nuclear deformation is not required for mechanotransduction signaling) cells exhibited other severe functional defects after LINC complex disruption; nuclear positioning and cell polarization were impaired in migrating cells and in cells plated on micropatterned substrates, and cell migration speed and persistence time were significantly reduced. Taken together, our findings suggest that the LINC complex is critical for nucleo-cytoskeletal force transmission and that LINC complex disruption can result in defects in cellular structure and function that may contribute to the development of muscular dystrophies and cardiomyopathies.     

Centrosome reorientation in wound-edge cells is cell type specific

The reorientation of the microtubule organizing center during cell migration into a wound in the monolayer was directly observed in living wound-edge cells expressing gamma-tubulin tagged with green fluorescent protein. Our results demonstrate that in CHO cells, the centrosome reorients to a position in front of the nucleus, toward the wound edge, whereas in PtK cells, the centrosome lags behind the nucleus during migration into the wound. In CHO cells, the average rate of centrosome motion was faster than that of the nucleus; the converse was true in PtK cells. In both cell lines, centrosome motion was stochastic, with periods of rapid motion interspersed with periods of slower motion. Centrosome reorientation in CHO cells required dynamic microtubules and cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin activity and could be prevented by altering cell-to-cell or cell-to-substrate adhesion. Microtubule marking experiments using photoactivation of caged tubulin demonstrate that microtubules are transported in the direction of cell motility in both cell lines but that in PtK cells, microtubules move individually, whereas their movement is more coherent in CHO cells. Our data demonstrate that centrosome reorientation is not required for directed migration and that diverse cells use distinct mechanisms for remodeling the microtubule array during directed migration.     

Reinforcing the LINC complex connection to actin filaments: the role of FHOD1 in TAN line formation and nuclear movement

Positioning the nucleus is critical for many cellular processes including cell division, migration and differentiation. The linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex spans the inner and outer nuclear membranes and has emerged as a major factor in connecting the nucleus to the cytoskeleton for movement and positioning. Recently, we discovered that the diaphanous formin family member FHOD1 interacts with the LINC complex component nesprin-2 giant (nesprin-2G) and that this interaction plays essential roles in the formation of transmembrane actin-dependent nuclear (TAN) lines and nuclear movement during cell polarization in fibroblasts. We found that FHOD1 strengthens the connection between nesprin-2G and rearward moving dorsal actin cables by providing a second site of interaction between nesprin-2G and the actin cable. These results indicate that the LINC complex connection to the actin cytoskeleton can be enhanced by cytoplasmic factors and suggest a new model for TAN line formation. We discuss how the nesprin-2G-FHOD1 interaction may be regulated and its possible functional significance for development and disease.     

Communication between the cytoskeleton and the nuclear envelope to position the nucleus

In most eukaryotic cells, the nucleus is localized to a specific location. This highlight article focuses on recent advances describing the mechanisms of nuclear migration and anchorage. Central to nuclear positioning mechanisms is the communication between the nuclear envelope and the cytoskeleton. All three components of the cytoskeleton-microtubules, actin filaments and intermediate filaments-are involved in nuclear positioning to varying degrees in different cell types. KASH proteins on the outer nuclear membrane connect to SUN proteins on the inner nuclear membrane. Together they transfer forces between the cytoskeleton and the nuclear lamina. Once at the outer nuclear membrane, KASH proteins can interact with the cytoskeleton. Nuclear migrations are a component of many cellular migration events and defects in nuclear positioning lead to human diseases, most notably lissencephaly.     

Nuclear mechanics during cell migration

During cell migration, the movement of the nucleus must be coordinated with the cytoskeletal dynamics at the leading edge and trailing end, and, as a result, undergoes complex changes in position and shape, which in turn affects cell polarity, shape, and migration efficiency. We here describe the steps of nuclear positioning and deformation during cell polarization and migration, focusing on migration through three-dimensional matrices. We discuss molecular components that govern nuclear shape and stiffness, and review how nuclear dynamics are connected to and controlled by the actin, tubulin and intermediate cytoskeleton-based migration machinery and how this regulation is altered in pathological conditions. Understanding the regulation of nuclear biomechanics has important implications for cell migration during tissue regeneration, immune defence and cancer.     

Centrosome behavior in motile HGF-treated PtK2 cells expressing GFP-gamma tubulin.

In response to locomotory cues, many motile cells have been shown to reposition their centrosome to a location in front of the nucleus, towards the direction of cell migration. We examined centrosome position in PtK(2) epithelial cells treated with hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), which stimulates motility but, unlike chemotactic agents or wounding of a monolayer, provides no directional cues. To observe centrosome movement directly, a plasmid encoding human gamma tubulin fused to the green fluorescent protein was expressed in HGF-treated cells. In cells whose movements were unconstrained by neighboring cells, we found that the position of the centrosome was not correlated with the direction of cell locomotion. Further, in cells where the direction of locomotion changed during the observation period, the centrosome did not reorient toward the new direction of locomotion. Analysis of centrosome and nuclear movement showed that motion of the centrosome often lagged behind that of the nucleus. Analysis of 249 fixed cells stained with an antibody to gamma tubulin confirmed our observations in live cells: 69% of the cells had centrosomes behind the nucleus, away from the direction of locomotion. Of these, 41% had their centrosome in the retraction tail. Confocal microscopy showed that the microtubule array in HGF treated PtK(2) cells was predominantly non-centrosomal. Because microtubules are required for efficient cellular locomotion, we propose that non-centrosomal microtubules stabilize the direction of locomotion without a requirement for reorientation of the centrosome.     

Retinoic acid differentiation of HL-60 cells promotes cytoskeletal polarization

Retinoic acid (RA) treatment of HL-60 cells in vitro induces granulocytic differentiation, involving reorganization of the nucleus and cytoplasm, development of chemoattractant-directed migration, and eventual apoptosis. The present studies with HL-60/S4 cells document that major elements of the cytoskeleton are changed: actin increases by 50%; vimentin decreases by more than 95%. The cellular content of alpha-tubulin does not significantly change; but the centrosomal-microtubule (MT) array moves away from the lobulating nucleus. Cytoskeletal-modifying chemicals modulate this polarized reorganization: Taxol and cytochalasin D enhance centrosome movement; nocodazole reverses it. Cytoskeletal-modifying chemicals do not appear to affect nuclear lobulation or the integrity of envelope-limited chromatin sheets (ELCS). Employing bcl-2-overexpressing HL-60 cells permitted demonstration of nuclear lobulation, ELCS formation, and centrosome-MT movement concomitantly during RA-induced differentiation, implying independence between the cellular reorganization and apoptotic programs. RA appears to promote an inherent potential in HL-60 cells for cytoskeletal polarization, likely to be important for chemoattractant-directed cell migration, an established characteristic of mature granulocytes.     

Nuclear Motility in Glioma Cells Reveals a Cell-Line Dependent Role of Various Cytoskeletal Components

Nuclear migration is a general term for the movement of the nucleus towards a specific site in the cell. These movements are involved in a number of fundamental biological processes, such as fertilization, cell division, and embryonic development. Despite of its importance, the mechanism of nuclear migration is still poorly understood in mammalian cells. In order to shed light on the mechanical processes underlying nuclear movements, we adapted a micro-patterning based assay. C6 rat and U87 human glioma cells seeded on fibronectin patterns - thereby forced into a bipolar morphology - displayed oscillatory movements of the nucleus or the whole cell, respectively. We found that both the actomyosin system and microtubules are involved in the nuclear/cellular movements of both cell lines, but their contributions are cell-/migration-type specific. Dynein activity was necessary for nuclear migration of C6 cells but active myosin-II was dispensable. On the other hand, coupled nuclear and cellular movements of U87 cells were driven by actomyosin contraction. We explain these cell-line dependent effects by the intrinsic differences in the overall mechanical tension due to the various cytoskeletal elements inside the cell. Our observations showed that the movements of the nucleus and the centrosome are strongly correlated and display large variation, indicating a tight but flexible coupling between them. The data also indicate that the forces responsible for nuclear movements are not acting directly via the centrosome. Based on our observations, we propose a new model for nuclear oscillations in C6 cells in which dynein and microtubule dynamics are the main drivers of nuclear movements. This mechanism is similar to the meiotic nuclear oscillations of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and may be evolutionary conserved.     

Dynein is a motor for nuclear rotation while vimentin IFs is a “brake”

The positioning of the nucleus is achieved by two interconnected processes, anchoring and migration, both of which are controlled by cytoskeleton structures. Rotation is a special type of nuclear motility in many cell types, but its significance remains unclear. We used a vimentin-null cell line, MFT-16, which shows extensive nuclear rotation to study the phenomenon in detail. By selective disruption of cytoskeletal structures and video-microscopic analysis, nuclear rotation was a microtubule-dependent process that F-actin partially impedes. The dynein–dynactin complex is responsible and inhibiting this motor by expression of a dominant negative mutant of its component P-150 completely stops it. Nuclear rotation is powered by dynein associated with the nuclear envelope along stationary microtubules, centrosomes remaining immobile. We confirmed that vimentin IFs inhibit nuclear rotation, and variant proteins of the mutated wild type gene for vimentin that lacked considerable fragments of the N- and C-terminal domains restored nuclear anchoring. Immunochemical analysis showed that these mutated IFs also bound plectin, arguing for a key role of this cytolinker protein in nuclear anchoring. It is proposed that this versatile machinery guarantees not only rotation and the correct location of a nucleus, but also its orientation in a cell.     

Orientation and function of the nuclear-centrosomal axis during cell migration

A hallmark of polarity in most migrating cells is the orientation of the nuclear centrosomal (NC) axis relative to the front-back cellular axis. Here, we review 'effector functions' associated with the NC axis during cell migration. We highlight recent research that has demonstrated that the orientation of the NC axis depends upon the coordinated, but separate positioning of the nucleus and the centrosome. We stress the importance of environmental factors such as cell-cell contacts and substrate topology for NC axis orientation. Finally, we summarize tests of the significance of this axis for cell migration and disease.     

Cell polarity in sea urchin embryos: reorientation of cells occurs quickly in aggregates

Four apical components were used as markers for the apical end of the cell in studies centering on cell polarity in the early blastula stage of sea urchin embryos and in aggregates of cleavage stage cells. Cells were observed to maintain their polarity for several hours if dissociated and cultured in suspension. Orientation of cells in aggregates initially is random; however, within 3 hr the cells have reoriented so that their apical-basal axis corresponds to the correct inside-outside position in the aggregate. This reorientation occurs before formation of a basal lamina or a new hyalin layer in the aggregate, and appears to take place by a rotation or other movement of individual cells. The polarity within each cell is maintained during reorientation. An apical surface antigen is colocalized with concentrations of filamentous actin. Treatment of isolated cells with cytochalasin B causes the antigen to lose its apical position and eventually become distributed around the outside of the cell. Microtubules are visible radiating from two foci closely associated with the nucleus in untreated cells. Treatment of isolated cells with nocodazole leaves the apical cell surface marker and its associated actin undisturbed, but causes the nucleus to lose its apical position. Cytochalasin B and colchicine both prevent reorientation of cells in aggregates. Thus polarity appears to be a constant for the cells, and their reorientation in aggregates occurs prior to the polarized release of extraembryonic matrix and basal lamina.     

Involvement of colchicine-sensitive cytoplasmic element in premitotic nuclear positioning ofAdiantum protonemata

Summary When the red-light grown protonema ofAdiantum capillus-veneris was transferred to the dark, the nucleus ceased its migration ca. 5 hours before cell plate formation (Mineyuki andFuruya 1980). To see whether the nucleus was held by some cytoplasmic structure during nuclear positioning, protonemata were treated with various centrifugal forces at different stages of the cell cycle. Nuclei of G₁ phase were easily displaced by centrifugation at 360×g for 15 minutes, but those of G₂ or M phase were not displaced by it, suggesting that the nuclei were held by some cytoplasmic elements in G₂ or M phase. This nuclear anchoring was not detectable in protonemata that were treated with 5mM colchicine. With this treatment, the nucleus did not stop its migration at late G₂ and moved even in prophase. And the retardation of organelle movement which was observed in cytoplasm on the lateral side of the nucleus after the cessation of premitotic nuclear migration (Mineyuki andFuruya 1984) was not observed in the presence of colchicine. Thus the nuclei appear to be held by colchicine-sensitive structure in cytoplasm between the lateral surface of the nucleus and cell wall during the premitotic nuclear positioning. Electron micrographs showing cytoplasmic microtubules were consistent with the idea.Abbreviations PPN Premitotic positioning of the nucleus - L region Cytoplasm between the lateral surface of the nucleus and cell wall (seeMineyuki et al. 1984)     

The Drosophila Lissencephaly1 (DLis1) gene is required for nuclear migration

Nuclear movement is critical for several developmental processes in eukaryotes. Drosophila oogenesis provides a paradigmatic example in which localization of the nucleus generates a source of cellular asymmetry that is used in patterning both the anterior-posterior and the dorsal-ventral axes of the oocyte. In this study we show that mutations in the Drosophila Lissencephaly1 (DLis1) gene result in partial ventralization of the eggshell. DLis1 mutations affect the localization of gurken mRNA and protein in the oocyte. These defects are correlated with incorrect positioning of the oocyte nucleus, suggesting that DLis1 is required for nuclear migration. DLis1 shows significant sequence conservation across the evolutionary spectrum. Fungal cognates of DLis1 are involved in nuclear migration while homologs in humans and mice are implicated in neuronal migration. DLis1 shows genetic interactions with the Glued and Dynein heavy chain subunits of the dynein/dynactin complex, supporting the idea that the Lis1 family of proteins plays a role in microtubule motor-based nuclear motility.     

Nucleokinesis in neuronal migration

Neuronal migration is a critical phase of nervous system development and can be divided into two distinct phases: extension of the leading process and movement of the cell body and nucleus (nucleokinesis). Nucleokinesis appears to require many of the same cytoskeletal and signaling molecules used in cell mitosis. Converging studies suggest it requires cytoplasmic dynein, cell polarity genes, and microtubule-associated proteins that coordinate microtubule remodeling. These coordinate first the positioning of the centrosome (microtubule organizing center) in the leading process in front of the nucleus and then the movement of the nucleus towards the centrosome. The positioning of the centrosome and the dynamic regulation that couples and uncouples the nucleus underlies directed migration of neurons.     

Somatic nuclear division in the sporidia of Ustilago violacea. IV. Microtubules and the spindle-pole body.

In unbudded cells of the anther smut fungus Ustilago violacea there is a dome-shaped spindle-pole body (SPB) consisting of a core 0.1 mum in diameter surrounded by a ribosome-free region 0.3-0.4 mum in diameter lying in a pocket of the nuclear membrane. After budding the nucleus moves towards the bud and begins to rotate rapidly. At about this stage the SPB divides into two parallel bars each about 0.1-0.15 mum in diameter and 0.3 mum long, separated by a distance of about 0.3 mum. Microtubules associated with the nuclear membrane but not with the SPB are present at the time of nuclear rotation. These microtubules disappear when rotation stops. Microtubules attached to the SPB are found during migration of the chromatinic portion of the nucleus into the bud cell. These microtubules disappear when migration stops and the nuclear membrand begins to break down. The twin SPB bars appear to move into the nucleus through a break in the membrane and begin to move apart forming a spindle about 1 mum long. Chromosomal microtubules (one per kinetochore) were found in several serial sections, and in addition there appeared to be several continuous microtubules present. The separation of the two chromatinic masses appeared to result from elongation of the continuous microtubules to about 3 mum long. Cytoplasmic microtubules and spindle microtubules were both found attached to the SPB as it elongated and one nucleus returned to the mother cell. The paper concludes with a discussion of the SPB as a multifuncitonal control center affecting nuclear migration, spindle formation, membrane breakdown and synthesis, karyogamy, conjugation, budding, chromosomal movement, replication, and disjunction.     

Cellular mechanisms of nuclear migration

Subcellular mobility, positioning, and directional movement of the nucleus in a certain site of the cell or cenocyte and, less frequently, intercellular translocation of the nucleus accompany the cell and tissue differentiation, change of their functions, and the organism growth and development and its response to stress, plant–microbial interactions, symbiosis, and many other processes in plants and animals. The nucleus movement is performed and directed through the interaction between dynamic cytoskeleton components and nucleus by means of signal-binding proteins, including motor and linker. The cell responds to the external signal by mobilization and polar reconstruction of the cytoskeleton components, as a result of which the nucleus displacement by means of actomyosin or microtubule mechanisms in cooperation with dynein and kinesin occurs. In plants, the actomyosin mechanism is involved in the nucleus migration; it allows the nucleus to move rapidly and over significant distances in response to environmental stimuli. An important role in the nucleus translocation belongs to the linker complexes of the proteins that are inserted in the nuclear envelope, that connect and transmit signals from the plasmalemma to the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm, and that provide the skeletal basis for many subcellular compartments. Changes in the protein composition, conformational modifications of the proteins, and displacement of linkers from the nuclear envelope result in the nucleus detachment from the cytoskeleton, and change in the form, mechanical rigidity, and positioning of the nucleus.     

Auto-reverse nuclear migration in bipolar mammalian cells on micropatterned surfaces

A novel assay based on micropatterning and time-lapse microscopy has been developed for the study of nuclear migration dynamics in cultured mammalian cells. When cultured on 10-20-microm wide adhesive stripes, the motility of C6 glioma and primary mouse fibroblast cells is diminished. Nevertheless, nuclei perform an unexpected auto-reverse motion: when a migrating nucleus approaches the leading edge, it decelerates, changes the direction of motion, and accelerates to move toward the other end of the elongated cell. During this process, cells show signs of polarization closely following the direction of nuclear movement. The observed nuclear movement requires a functioning microtubular system, as revealed by experiments disrupting the main cytoskeletal components with specific drugs. On the basis of our results, we argue that auto-reverse nuclear migration is due to forces determined by the interplay of microtubule dynamics and the changing position of the microtubule organizing center as the nucleus reaches the leading edge. Our assay recapitulates specific features of nuclear migration (cell polarization, oscillatory nuclear movement), while it allows the systematic study of a large number of individual cells. In particular, our experiments yielded the first direct evidence of reversive nuclear motion in mammalian cells, induced by attachment constraints.