COMMD1 Promotes pVHL and O2-Independent Proteolysis of HIF-1α via HSP90/70

Background

The Copper Metabolism MURR1 Domain containing 1 protein COMMD1 has been associated with copper homeostasis, NF-κB signaling, and sodium transport. Recently, we identified COMMD1 as a novel protein in HIF-1 signaling. Mouse embryos deficient for Commd1 have increased expression of hypoxia/HIF-regulated genes i.e. VEGF, PGK and Bnip3. Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are master regulators of oxygen homeostasis, which control angiogenesis, erythropoiesis, glycolysis and cell survival/proliferation under normal and pathologic conditions. Although HIF activity is mainly controlled by ubiquitination and protein degradation by the von Hippel Lindau (pVHL) tumor suppressor gene other mechanisms have recently been identified that regulate HIF signaling independently of pVHL.

Principal Findings

Here we characterized the mechanism by which COMMD1 regulates HIF-1α protein degradation. We show that COMMD1 competes with the chaperone heat shock protein HSP90β for binding to the NH₂-terminal DNA-binding and heterodimerization domain of HIF-1α to regulate HIF-1α stability together with HSP70. Inhibition of HSP90 activity with 17-Allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) increased COMMD1-mediated HIF-1α degradation independent of ubiquitin and pVHL.

Conclusion/Significance

These data reveal a novel role for COMMD1 in conjunction with HSP90β/HSP70 in the ubiquitin and O₂-independent regulation of HIF-1α.     

HIF-1α、HSP90α在肝细胞癌中的表达及临床意义

目的:探讨缺氧诱导因子-1α(HIF-1α)和热休克蛋白9Oα(HSP90α)在肝细胞癌中的表达及其与临床病理特征之间的关系。方法:采用免疫组织化学Envision二步法检测H HIF-1α和HSP90α蛋白在65例肝细胞癌和癌旁组织、20例正常肝组织中的表达,并分析其与肝细胞癌临床病理因素的关系。结果:HCC组织中HIF-1α和HSP90α阳性表达率均明显高于癌旁组织及正常肝脏组织,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。HIF-1α在HCC组织中的表达与肿瘤大小、临床分期、病理分级、有无淋巴结转移、有无门静脉癌栓密切相关(P<0.01),HSP90α在HCC组织中的表达与临床分期、病理分级、有无淋巴结转移、有无门静脉癌栓密切相关(P<0.01)。Spearman相关性检验分析提示HIF-1α和HSP90α表达阳性程度呈正相关(r=0.536,P<0.01)。结论:HIF-1α和HSP90α参与肝细胞癌的发生、发展,并起协同作用,可能作为判断肝细胞癌预后的指标。     

Differential roles of Sirt1 in HIF-1α and HIF-2α mediated hypoxic responses

Hypoxia-inducible factors 1α and 2α (HIF-1α and HIF-2α) determine cancer cell fate under hypoxia. Despite the similarities of their structures, HIF-1α and HIF-2α have distinct roles in cancer growth under hypoxia, that is, HIF-1α induces growth arrest whereas HIF-2α promotes cell growth. Recently, sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) was reported to fine-tune cellular responses to hypoxia by deacetylating HIF-1α and HIF-2α. Yet, the roles of Sirt1 in HIF-1α and HIF-2α functions have been controversial. We here investigated the precise roles of Sirt1 in HIF-1α and HIF-2α regulations. Immunological analyses revealed that HIF-1α K674 and HIF-2α K741 are acetylated by PCAF and CBP, respectively, but are deacetylated commonly by Sirt1. In the Gal4 reporter systems, Sirt1 was found to repress HIF-1α activity constantly in ten cancer cell-lines but to regulate HIF-2α activity cell type-dependently. Moreover, Sirt1 determined cell growth under hypoxia depending on HIF-1α and HIF-2α. Under hypoxia, Sirt1 promoted cell proliferation of HepG2, in which Sirt1 differentially regulates HIF-1α and HIF-2α. In contrast, such an effect of Sirt1 was not shown in HCT116, in which Sirt1 inactivates both HIF-1α and HIF-2α because conflicting actions of HIF-1α and HIF-2α on cell growth may be offset. Our results provide a better understanding of the roles of Sirt1 in HIF-mediated hypoxic responses and also a basic concept for developing anticancer strategy targeting Sirt1.     

HIF-1α protein is upregulated in HIF-2α depleted cells via enhanced translation

The hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1 and HIF-2 are primarily regulated via stabilization of their respective α-subunits under hypoxic conditions. Previously, compensatory upregulation of one HIF-α-subunit upon depletion of the other α-subunit was described, yet the underlying mechanism remained elusive. Here we provide evidence that enhanced HIF-1α protein expression in HIF-2α knockdown (k/d) cells neither results from elevated HIF-1α mRNA expression, nor from increased HIF-1α protein stability. Instead, we identify enhanced HIF-1α translation as molecular mechanism. Moreover, we found elevated levels of the RNA-binding protein HuR and provide evidence that HuR is critical for the compensatory HIF-1α regulation in HIF-2α k/d cells.     

HSP90, HSPA8, HIF-1 alpha and HSP70-2 polymorphisms in breast cancer: a case–control study

This case control study aims to investigate the role of HSP90 Gln488His (C?>?G), HSP70-2 P1/P2, HIF-1 alpha C1772T and HSPA8 intronic 1541–1542delGT polymorphisms as potential risk factors and/or prognostic markers for breast cancer. 113 consecutive incident cases of histologically confirmed ductal breast cancer and 124 healthy cases were recruited. The above mentioned polymorphisms were genotyped; multivariate logistic regression was performed. HSP90 GG (His/His) genotype was associated with elevated breast cancer risk. Similarly, the allele dose–response model pointed to increase in breast cancer risk per G allele. HSP70-2 P1/P2, HSPA8 intronic 1541–1542delGT and HIF-1 alpha polymorphisms were not associated with breast cancer risk, as evidenced by the dose–response allele models. The positive association between HSP90 G allele and breast cancer risk seemed to pertain to both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. With respect to survival analysis, none of the aforementioned polymorphisms was associated with either disease-free survival or overall survival. HSP90α Gln488His polymorphism seems to be a risk factor for breast cancer. On the other hand, our study did not point to excess risk conferred by HSPA8 1541–1542delGT, Hsp70-2 P1/P2 and HIF-1α C1772T.     

Corbicula (Bivalvia: Sphaeriacea) vs. Indigenous Mussels (Bivalvia: Unionacea) in U.S. Rivers: A Hard Case for Interspecific Competition?

At a time when populations of indigenous river mussels havebeen dwindling and/or disappearing, the introduced Asian clam,Corbicula, has spread through many U.S. rivers from Californiato Florida. In the Arkansas River Navigation System, a heavilymanaged waterway, Corbicula presently has a different competitivepresence than it does in the relatively unmanaged Buffalo Riverin Arkansas. Comparative studies of both Corbicula and indigenousbivalved mollusks reveal biological bases for the contrastingkinds of benthic faunal change. There are ecologically relevant,distinctive differences between the two kinds of animals: inmantle/shell and mantle/gill apparatus, in the reproductivecomplex and neuroanatomy, and in spawning and locomotor behaviors.It is argued that the conservative molluscan characteristicsof Corbicula enable it to function in an exclusive, contradictoryrole with indigenous bivalves in a heavily managed waterway,and in a contrary competitive role elsewhere. Rationale ispresented for incorporating organismic evaluation into studiesof competition between distantly related taxa.     

Distinct Roles of Molecular Chaperones HSP90α and HSP90β in the Biogenesis of KCNQ4 Channels

Loss-of-function mutations in the KCNQ4 channel cause DFNA2, a subtype of autosomal dominant non-syndromic deafness that is characterized by progressive sensorineural hearing loss. Previous studies have demonstrated that the majority of the pathogenic KCNQ4 mutations lead to trafficking deficiency and loss of KCNQ4 currents. Over the last two decades, various strategies have been developed to rescue trafficking deficiency of pathogenic mutants; the most exciting advances have been made by manipulating activities of molecular chaperones involved in the biogenesis and quality control of the target protein. However, such strategies have not been established for KCNQ4 mutants and little is known about the molecular chaperones governing the KCNQ4 biogenesis. To identify KCNQ4-associated molecular chaperones, a proteomic approach was used in this study. As a result, two major molecular chaperones, HSP70 and HSP90, were identified and then confirmed by reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation assays, suggesting that the HSP90 chaperone pathway might be involved in the KCNQ4 biogenesis. Manipulating chaperone expression further revealed that two different isoforms of HSP90, the inducible HSP90α and the constitutive HSP90β, had opposite effects on the cellular level of the KCNQ4 channel; that HSP40, HSP70, and HOP, three key components of the HSP90 chaperone pathway, were crucial in facilitating KCNQ4 biogenesis. In contrast, CHIP, a major E3 ubiquitin ligase, had an opposite effect. Collectively, our data suggest that HSP90α and HSP90β play key roles in controlling KCNQ4 homeostasis via the HSP40-HSP70-HOP-HSP90 chaperone pathway and the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Most importantly, we found that over-expression of HSP90β significantly improved cell surface expression of the trafficking-deficient, pathogenic KCNQ4 mutants L274H and W276S. KCNQ4 surface expression was restored by HSP90β in cells mimicking heterozygous conditions of the DFNA2 patients, even though it was not sufficient to rescue the function of KCNQ4 channels.     

Differences in hydroxylation and binding of Notch and HIF-1α demonstrate substrate selectivity for factor inhibiting HIF-1 (FIH-1)

FIH-1, factor inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), regulates oxygen sensing by hydroxylating an asparagine within HIF-α. It also hydroxylates asparagines in many proteins containing ankyrin repeats, including Notch1–3, p105 and IκBα. Relative binding affinity and hydroxylation rate are crucial determinants of substrate selection and modification. We determined the contributions of substrate sequence composition and length and of oxygen concentration to the FIH-1-binding and/or hydroxylation of Notch1–4 and compared them with those for HIF-1α. We also demonstrated hydroxylation of two asparagines in Notch2 and 3, corresponding to Sites 1 and 2 of Notch1, by mass spectrometry for the first time.Our data demonstrate that substrate length has a much greater influence on FIH-1-dependent hydroxylation of Notch than of HIF-1α, predominantly through binding affinity rather than maximal reaction velocity. The K_m value of FIH-1 for Notch1, <0.2 μM, is at least 250-fold lower than that of 50 μM for HIF-1α. Site 1 of Notch1–3 appeared the preferred site of FIH-1 hydroxylation in these substrates. Interestingly, binding of Notch4 to FIH-1 was observed with an affinity almost 10-fold lower than for Notch1–3, but no hydroxylation was detected. Importantly, we demonstrate that the K_m of FIH-1 for oxygen at the preferred Site 1 of Notch1–3, 10–19 μM, is an order of magnitude lower than that for Site 2 or HIF-1α. Hence, at least during in vitro hydroxylation, Notch is likely to become efficiently hydroxylated by FIH-1 even under relatively severe hypoxic conditions, where HIF-1α hydroxylation would be reduced.     

HIF-1α versus HIF-2α in endothelial cells and vascular functions: Is there a master in angiogenesis regulation?

Comment on: Skuli N, et al. Blood 2009; 114:469-477.