A SIM-ultaneous role for SUMO and ubiquitin

Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls) share a beta-GRASP fold and have key roles in cellular growth and suppression of genome instability. Despite their common fold, SUMO and ubiquitin are classically portrayed as distinct, and they can have antagonistic roles. Recently, a new family of proteins, the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO)-targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs), which directly connect sumoylation and ubiquitylation, has been discovered. Uniquely, STUbLs use SUMO-interaction motifs (SIMs) to recognize their sumoylated targets. STUbLs are global regulators of protein sumoylation levels, and cells lacking STUbLs display genomic instability and hypersensitivity to genotoxic stress. The human STUbL, RNF4, is implicated in several diseases including cancer, highlighting the importance of characterizing the cellular functions of STUbLs.     

Structural basis for regulation of poly‐SUMO chain by a SUMO‐like domain of Nip45

Post‐translational modification by small ubiquitin‐like modifier (SUMO) provides an important regulatory mechanism in diverse cellular processes. Modification of SUMO has been shown to target proteins involved in systems ranging from DNA repair pathways to the ubiquitin‐proteasome degradation system by the action of SUMO‐targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs). STUbLs recognize target proteins modified with a poly‐SUMO chain through their SUMO‐interacting motifs (SIMs). STUbLs are also associated with RENi family proteins, which commonly have two SUMO‐like domains (SLD1 and SLD2) at their C terminus. We have determined the crystal structures of SLD2 of mouse RENi protein, Nip45, in a free form and in complex with a mouse E2 sumoylation enzyme, Ubc9. While Nip45 SLD2 shares a β‐grasp fold with SUMO, the SIM interaction surface conserved in SUMO paralogues does not exist in SLD2. Biochemical data indicates that neither tandem SLDs or SLD2 of Nip45 bind to either tandem SIMs from either mouse STUbL, RNF4 or to those from SUMO‐binding proteins, whose interactions with SUMO have been well characterized. On the other hand, Nip45 SLD2 binds to Ubc9 in an almost identical manner to that of SUMO and thereby inhibits elongation of poly‐SUMO chains. This finding highlights a possible role of the RENi proteins in the modulation of Ubc9‐mediated poly‐SUMO formation. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Cytoplasmic sumoylation by PIAS-type Siz1-SUMO ligase

SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier), a 12 kDa protein with distant similarity to ubiquitin, covalently binds to many proteins in eukaryotic cells. In contrast to ubiquitination, which mainly regulates proteasome-dependent degradation and protein sorting, sumoylation is known to regulate assembly and disassembly of protein complexes, protein localization and stability, and so on. SUMO is primarily localized to the nucleus, and many SUMO substrates are nuclear proteins involved in DNA transaction. However, certain roles of SUMO conjugates have been shown outside the nucleus. Particularly in budding yeast, SUMO is also localized to the bud-neck in a cell cycle-dependent manner. The first and prominent SUMO substrates are septins, evolutionally conserved proteins required for cytokinesis in yeast. Recent analysis of human septin structure would greatly facilitate the study of the functions of these SUMO conjugates. SUMO modification of septins is regulated by cell cycle-dependent nuclear transport of PIAS-type Siz1 (SUMO E3) and Ulp1 desumoylation enzyme in yeast. Domains outside the SUMO-ligase core (SP-RING) of Siz1 ensure its regulations. Furthermore, newly discovered ubiquitin ligases that specifically recognize poly-SUMO conjugates could lead to degradation of SUMO conjugates. Thus, protein modifications seem to be regulated in an unexpectedly complex manner. In this review, we focus on various regulations in yeast septin sumoylation and discuss its possible functions.     

Regulation of the p53 pathway by ubiquitin and related proteins

The p53 tumour suppressor protein is subject to many levels of control, including modification with ubiquitin and related proteins such as SUMO and NEDD8. These modifications regulate p53 at a number of levels, including control of protein turnover, alterations in sub-cellular localization and changes in the ability to regulate gene expression. Numerous E3 ligases that can mediate these modifications of p53 have been described, some of which promote conjugation with more than one ubiquitin-like protein. Understanding the complexity of this mechanism of p53 regulation will help in the development of therapeutic drugs that function to modulate these events.     

RNF111/Arkadia is a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase that facilitates the DNA damage response

Protein modifications by ubiquitin and small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) play key roles in cellular signaling pathways. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs) directly couple these modifications by selectively recognizing SUMOylated target proteins through SUMO-interacting motifs (SIMs), promoting their K48-linked ubiquitylation and degradation. Only a single mammalian STUbL, RNF4, has been identified. We show that human RNF111/Arkadia is a new STUbL, which used three adjacent SIMs for specific recognition of poly-SUMO2/3 chains, and used Ubc13–Mms2 as a cognate E2 enzyme to promote nonproteolytic, K63-linked ubiquitylation of SUMOylated target proteins. We demonstrate that RNF111 promoted ubiquitylation of SUMOylated XPC (xeroderma pigmentosum C) protein, a central DNA damage recognition factor in nucleotide excision repair (NER) extensively regulated by ultraviolet (UV)-induced SUMOylation and ubiquitylation. Moreover, we show that RNF111 facilitated NER by regulating the recruitment of XPC to UV-damaged DNA. Our findings establish RNF111 as a new STUbL that directly links nonproteolytic ubiquitylation and SUMOylation in the DNA damage response.     

A SUMO-interacting motif activates budding yeast ubiquitin ligase Rad18 towards SUMO-modified PCNA

SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs) recognize sumoylated proteins as substrates for ubiquitylation and have been implicated in several aspects of DNA repair and the damage response. However, few physiological STUbL substrates have been identified, and the relative importance of SUMO binding versus direct interactions with the substrate remains a matter of debate. We now present evidence that the ubiquitin ligase Rad18 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which monoubiquitylates the sliding clamp protein proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in response to DNA damage, exhibits the hallmarks of a STUbL. Although not completely dependent on sumoylation, Rad18’s activity towards PCNA is strongly enhanced by the presence of SUMO on the clamp. The stimulation is brought about by a SUMO-interacting motif in Rad18, which also mediates sumoylation of Rad18 itself. Our results imply that sumoylated PCNA is the physiological ubiquitylation target of budding yeast Rad18 and suggest a new mechanism by which the transition from S phase-associated sumoylation to damage-induced ubiquitylation of PCNA is accomplished.     

Genome-wide YFP fluorescence complementation screen identifies new regulators for telomere signaling in human cells

Detection of low-affinity or transient interactions can be a bottleneck in our understanding of signaling networks. To address this problem, we developed an arrayed screening strategy based on protein complementation to systematically investigate protein-protein interactions in live human cells, and performed a large-scale screen for regulators of telomeres. Maintenance of vertebrate telomeres requires the concerted action of members of the Telomere Interactome, built upon the six core telomeric proteins TRF1, TRF2, RAP1, TIN2, TPP1, and POT1. Of the ～12,000 human proteins examined, we identified over 300 proteins that associated with the six core telomeric proteins. The majority of the identified proteins have not been previously linked to telomere biology, including regulators of post-translational modifications such as protein kinases and ubiquitin E3 ligases. Results from this study shed light on the molecular niche that is fundamental to telomere regulation in humans, and provide a valuable tool to investigate signaling pathways in mammalian cells.     

A viral ubiquitin ligase has substrate preferential SUMO targeted ubiquitin ligase activity that counteracts intrinsic antiviral defence

Intrinsic antiviral resistance represents the first line of intracellular defence against virus infection. During herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1) infection this response can lead to the repression of viral gene expression but is counteracted by the viral ubiquitin ligase ICP0. Here we address the mechanisms by which ICP0 overcomes this antiviral response. We report that ICP0 induces the widespread proteasome-dependent degradation of SUMO-conjugated proteins during infection and has properties related to those of cellular SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs). Mutation of putative SUMO interaction motifs within ICP0 not only affects its ability to degrade SUMO conjugates, but also its capacity to stimulate HSV-1 lytic infection and reactivation from quiescence. We demonstrate that in the absence of this viral countermeasure the SUMO conjugation pathway plays an important role in mediating intrinsic antiviral resistance and the repression of HSV-1 infection. Using PML as a model substrate, we found that whilst ICP0 preferentially targets SUMO-modified isoforms of PML for degradation, it also induces the degradation of PML isoform I in a SUMO modification-independent manner. PML was degraded by ICP0 more rapidly than the bulk of SUMO-modified proteins in general, implying that the identity of a SUMO-modified protein, as well as the presence of SUMO modification, is involved in ICP0 targeting. We conclude that ICP0 has dual targeting mechanisms involving both SUMO- and substrate-dependent targeting specificities in order to counteract intrinsic antiviral resistance to HSV-1 infection.     

Small ubiquitin-like modifying protein isopeptidase assay based on poliovirus RNA polymerase activity

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is the major nonlysosomal proteolytic system in eukaryotic cells responsible for regulating the level of many key regulatory molecules within the cells. Modification of cellular proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins, such as small ubiquitin-like modifying protein (SUMO), plays an essential role in a number of biological schemes, and ubiquitin pathway enzymes have become important therapeutic targets. Ubiquitination is a dynamic reversible process; a multitude of ubiquitin ligases and deubiquitinases (DUBs) are responsible for the wide-ranging influence of this pathway as well as its selectivity. The DUB enzymes serve to maintain adequate pools of free ubiquitin and regulate the ubiquitination status of cellular proteins. Using SUMO fusions, a novel assay system, based on poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity, is described here. The method simplifies the isopeptidase assay and facilitates high-throughput analysis of these enzymes. The principle of the assay is the dependence of the viral polymerase on a free N terminus for activity; accordingly, the polymerase is inactive when fused at its N terminus to SUMO or any other ubiquitin-like protein. The assay is sensitive, reproducible, and adaptable to a high-throughput format for use in screens for inhibitors/activators of clinically relevant SUMO proteases and deubiquitinases.     

SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability

We identify the SUMO-Targeted Ubiquitin Ligase (STUbL) family of proteins and propose that STUbLs selectively ubiquitinate sumoylated proteins and proteins that contain SUMO-like domains (SLDs). STUbL recruitment to sumoylated/SLD proteins is mediated by tandem SUMO interaction motifs (SIMs) within the STUbLs N-terminus. STUbL-mediated ubiquitination maintains sumoylation pathway homeostasis by promoting target protein desumoylation and/or degradation. Thus, STUbLs establish a novel mode of communication between the sumoylation and ubiquitination pathways. STUbLs are evolutionarily conserved and include: Schizosaccharomyces pombe Slx8-Rfp (founding member), Homo sapiens RNF4, Dictyostelium discoideum MIP1 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Slx5-Slx8. Cells lacking Slx8-Rfp accumulate sumoylated proteins, display genomic instability, and are hypersensitive to genotoxic stress. These phenotypes are suppressed by deletion of the major SUMO ligase Pli1, demonstrating the specificity of STUbLs as regulators of sumoylated proteins. Notably, human RNF4 expression restores SUMO pathway homeostasis in fission yeast lacking Slx8-Rfp, underscoring the evolutionary functional conservation of STUbLs. The DNA repair factor Rad60 and its human homolog NIP45, which contain SLDs, are candidate STUbL targets. Consistently, Rad60 and Slx8-Rfp mutants have similar DNA repair defects.     

Regulating the regulator: negative regulation of Cbl ubiquitin ligases

Cbl proteins are regulators of signal transduction through many pathways and, consequently, regulate cell function and development. They are ubiquitin ligases that ubiquitinate and target many signaling molecules for degradation. The Cbl proteins themselves are regulated by an increasingly complex network of interactions that fine-tune the effects that Cbl proteins have on signaling. The negative regulation of Cbl protein function can occur via cis-acting structural elements that prevent inappropriate ubiquitin ligase activity, degradation of the Cbl proteins, inhibition without degradation owing to interaction with other signaling proteins, deubiquitination of Cbl substrates, and regulation of assembly of the endosomal ESCRT-I complex. Defects in the regulatory mechanisms that control Cbl function are implicated in the development of immunological and malignant diseases.     

The yeast homologue of the microtubule-associated protein Lis1 interacts with the sumoylation machinery and a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase

Microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins are fundamental for multiple cellular processes, including mitosis and intracellular motility, but the factors that control microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) are poorly understood. Here we show that two MAPs—the CLIP-170 homologue Bik1p and the Lis1 homologue Pac1p—interact with several proteins in the sumoylation pathway. Bik1p and Pac1p interact with Smt3p, the yeast SUMO; Ubc9p, an E2; and Nfi1p, an E3. Bik1p interacts directly with SUMO in vitro, and overexpression of Smt3p and Bik1p results in its in vivo sumoylation. Modified Pac1p is observed when the SUMO protease Ulp1p is inactivated. Both ubiquitin and Smt3p copurify with Pac1p. In contrast to ubiquitination, sumoylation does not directly tag the substrate for degradation. However, SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs) can recognize a sumoylated substrate and promote its degradation via ubiquitination and the proteasome. Both Pac1p and Bik1p interact with the STUbL Nis1p-Ris1p and the protease Wss1p. Strains deleted for RIS1 or WSS1 accumulate Pac1p conjugates. This suggests a novel model in which the abundance of these MAPs may be regulated via STUbLs. Pac1p modification is also altered by Kar9p and the dynein regulator She1p. This work has implications for the regulation of dynein''s interaction with various cargoes, including its off-loading to the cortex.     

The yeast Hex3.Slx8 heterodimer is a ubiquitin ligase stimulated by substrate sumoylation

Hex3 and Slx8 are Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins with important functions in DNA damage control and maintenance of genomic stability. Both proteins have RING domains at their C termini. Such domains are common in ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like protein ligases (E3s), but little was known about the molecular functions of either protein. In this study we identified HEX3 as a high-copy suppressor of a temperature-sensitive small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) protease mutant, ulp1ts, suggesting that it may affect cellular SUMO dynamics. Remarkably, even a complete deletion of ULP1 is strongly suppressed. Hex3 forms a heterodimer with Slx8. We found that the Hex3.Slx8 complex has a robust substrate-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. In this E3 complex, Slx8 appears to bear the core ligase function, with Hex3 strongly enhancing its activity. Notably, SUMO attachment to a substrate stimulates its Hex3.Slx8-dependent ubiquitination, primarily through direct noncovalent interactions between SUMO and Hex3. Our data reveal a novel mechanism of substrate targeting in which sumoylation of a protein can help trigger its subsequent ubiquitination by recruiting a SUMO-binding ubiquitin ligase.     

Analysis of Small Ubiquitin-Like Modifier (SUMO) Targets Reflects the Essential Nature of Protein SUMOylation and Provides Insight to Elucidate the Role of SUMO in Plant Development

Posttranslational modification of proteins by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) has received much attention, reflected by a flood of recent studies implicating SUMO in a wide range of cellular and molecular activities, many of which are conserved throughout eukaryotes. Whereas most of these studies were performed in vitro or in single cells, plants provide an excellent system to study the role of SUMO at the developmental level. Consistent with its essential roles during plant development, mutations of the basic SUMOylation machinery in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) cause embryo stage arrest or major developmental defects due to perturbation of the dynamics of target SUMOylation. Efforts to identify SUMO protein targets in Arabidopsis have been modest; however, recent success in identifying thousands of human SUMO targets using unique experimental designs can potentially help identify plant SUMO targets more efficiently. Here, known Arabidopsis SUMO targets are reevaluated, and potential approaches to dissect the roles of SUMO in plant development are discussed.Protein structure, and hence function, is determined not only by the primary amino acids sequence dictated by its gene sequence, but also by the many modifications they receive co- and posttranslationally. Some of these modifications involve chemical changes of amino acids (such as citrullination, deamidation, and racemization), whereas others involve structural changes in proteins (such as formation of disulfide bridges and the maturation of a precursor protein by proteotytic cleavage). Other modifications involve addition of functional groups, such as in the cases of acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, etc., or even sometimes other peptides. These modifications result in different topologies and activities of mature proteins and hence increase the repertoire of cellular proteins tremendously and provide a vast source of variation beyond that determined at the DNA or RNA levels. Many of these modifications are reversible, and their effects, albeit crucial for normal growth, development, and response to environmental cues, might be subtle, presenting challenges for studies attempting to correlate these modifications with phenotypes. One such posttranslational modification involves the covalent attachment (conjugation) of a family of small proteins to target proteins. Ubiquitin is the founding member of these small protein modifiers; however, a superfamily of more than 12 ubiquitin-like (UBL) proteins have been characterized and shown to regulate various aspects of cellular activity through modulation of protein structure and function (Hochstrasser, 2009; Vierstra, 2012). Although they share only low similarity at the primary amino acid sequence, these protein modifiers share a conserved three-dimensional structure as well as similar overall enzymatic reactions that lead to their conjugation and deconjugation to target proteins (Vierstra, 2012), suggesting that they probably have an ancient and common origin. Consistent with this idea, the bacterial proteins ThiS and MoaD, which act as sulfur donors during the synthesis of Thiamine and Molybdenum cofactor, are structurally related to ubiquitin, and the enzymes required for their activation (ThiF and MoeB, respectively) are related to the ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1; Fig. 1; see discussion below; for review, see Hochstrasser, 2009). Recent evidence reveals that a simple, but complete, ubiquitin system is present in three extant archaeal groups and hence proposes a preeukaryotic origin of the UBLs (Grau-Bové et al., 2015). During the evolution of eukaryotes, this system expanded greatly to give rise to all known UBLs and their conjugation and deconjugation enzymes, including those for small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO), and it is believed that all these modifications existed in the last eukaryotic common ancestor (Grau-Bové et al., 2015). The ancient origins of these protein modification systems may explain why many of the cellular processes they regulate are conserved throughout eukaryotes. Attachment of ubiquitin and SUMO, specifically, play crucial roles in eukaryotic growth and development, and these two UBLs are the most important and extensively studied of all small protein modifiers. Interestingly, the evolutionary routes that the UBL system followed, particularly those of ubiquitin and SUMO, seem to have involved different mechanisms during the evolution of plants and other eukaryotes from their common eukaryotic ancestor, pointing to potential differences specific to plants while conserving core molecular and cellular processes regulated by these UBLs (Grau-Bové et al., 2015; N. Elrouby and S.R. Strickler, unpublished data).Open in a separate windowFigure 1. The SUMO conjugation and deconjugation system. SUMO is produced as a precursor protein with a C-terminal extension. SUMO proteases cleave off the C-terminal tail to expose the reactive carboxyl group of the C-terminal Gly. The SAE (or El) with its two subunits (SAE1 and SAE2) forms a thioester bond with this Gly residue to prepare for its transfer to the SCE (or E2). In addition to the thioester bond, the SCE binds SUMO noncovalently as well and eventually transfers SUMO to a target protein, usually with the aid of a third enzyme (E3), the SUMO ligase such as SIZ1. Targets, now covalently modified by SUMO through an isopeptide bond, perform specific functions, which are subsequently terminated by either removing SUMO from the target protein (deconjugation) or by regulated proteolysis. SUMO proteases with isopeptidase activity specifically and precisely hydrolyze the isopeptide bond, releasing free SUMO and target protein. Alternatively, a polySUMO chain forms through the activity of SUMO ligases (E4) such as PIAL1 and PIAL2, and this chain recruits STUbLs, which ubiquitinate both SUMO and the target protein and target them for degradation by the 26S proteasome. All gene models are derived from terminology in Arabidopsis. S, SUMO; Ub, ubiquitin; UPS, ubiquitin-proteasome system.The enzymatic reactions that lead to the attachment of ubiquitin or SUMO to target proteins are very similar (Fig. 1). SUMO is produced as a precursor protein that contains two (in most SUMO isoforms) Gly residues near its C-terminal end (Novatchkova et al., 2004). A processing SUMO protease cleaves off the C-terminal end of the SUMO precursor to expose the reactive carboxyl group of the second Gly. Through an ATP-dependent pathway that involves three enzymatic activities (E1→E2→E3), the C-terminal end of mature SUMO eventually forms an isopeptide bond with the ε-amino group of a Lys residue in the target protein (Fig. 1; Dohmen, 2004). Target modification leads to a variety of effects (discussed below) that mainly regulate target protein activity, subcellular location, and interaction dynamics. However, unlike modification by ubiquitin (ubiquitination), which mainly leads to target degradation by a specialized multisubunit protease called the 26S proteasome, there is no evidence linking SUMOylation directly to target proteolysis (in some cases, modification of a protein by a polySUMO chain may lead to its ubiquitination, which itself targets the protein for degradation [see below]; Geiss-Friedlander and Melchior, 2007). Because most of our knowledge of the enzymology, structural biology, and functional implications of SUMOylation is derived from work performed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and mammalian cell lines, this article updates our knowledge of the field in general, with emphasis on relevant data from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) whenever possible and a focus on SUMO protein targets. Plants provide an ideal model system to study the roles of SUMO during development, and hence knowledge gleaned from studies of yeast and human SUMO may provide guidelines that will help advance our understanding of the roles of SUMO in plant development.     

SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases

Covalent posttranslational modification with SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) modulates functions of a wide range of proteins in eukaryotic cells. Sumoylation affects the activity, interaction properties, subcellular localization and the stability of its substrate proteins. The recent discovery of a novel class of ubiquitin ligases (E3), termed ULS (E3-S) or STUbL, that recognize sumoylated proteins, links SUMO modification to the ubiquitin/proteasome system. Here we review recent insights into the properties and function of these ligases and their roles in regulating sumoylated proteins. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Ubiquitin–Proteasome System. Guest Editors: Thomas Sommer and Dieter H. Wolf.     

Scores of RINGS but No PHDs in Ubiquitin Signaling

Recently, it has been claimed that PHD fingers of MEKK1 kinase and a family of viral and cellularl membrane proteins have E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Here we describe unique sequence and structural signatures that distinguish PHD fingers from RING fingers, which function primarily as E3 ubiquitin ligases, and demonstrate that the Zn-binding modules of the above proteins are distinct versions of the RING domains rather than PHD fingers. Thus, currently available data reveal extreme versatility of RINGs and their derivatives as E3 ubiquitin ligases but provide no evidence of this activity among PHD fingers whose principal function appears to involve specific protein-protein and possibly protein-DNA interactions in chromatin.