Gadd45a interacts with aurora-A and inhibits its kinase activity

Centrosome stability is required for successful mitosis in mammalian cells. Amplification of the centrosome leads to chromosomal missegregation and generation of aneuploidy, which are closely associated with cell transformation and tumorigenesis (Doxsey, S. J. (2001) Nat. Cell Biol. 3, E105-E108; Hinchcliffe, E. H., and Sluder, G. (2001) Genes Dev. 15, 1167-1181; Pihan, G. A., Purohit, A., Wallace, J., Malhotra, R., Liotta, L., and Doxsey, S. J. (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 2212-2219). However, there are currently limited insights into mechanism(s) for this critical biological event. Here we show that Gadd45a, a DNA damage-inducible protein that is regulated by tumor suppressors p53 and BRCA1, participates in the maintenance of centrosome stability. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts derived from gadd45a knock-out mice exhibit centrosome amplification (designated as increased centrosome numbers). Introduction of exogenous Gadd45a into mouse embryonic fibroblasts isolated from gadd45a-null mice substantially restored the normal centrosome profile. In contrast to p21(waf1/cip1), which ensures coordinated initiation of centrosome, Gadd45a had no significant effect on centrosome duplication in S phase. Interestingly Gadd45a was found to physically associate with Aurora-A protein kinase, whose deregulated expression results in centrosome abnormality. Furthermore Gadd45a was demonstrated to strongly inhibit Aurora-A kinase activity and to antagonize Aurora-A-induced centrosome amplification. These findings identify a novel mechanism for Gadd45a in the maintenance of centrosome stability and broaden understandings of p53- and BRCA1-regulated signaling pathways in maintaining genomic fidelity.     

Gadd45a, a p53- and BRCA1-regulated stress protein, in cellular response to DNA damage

Mammalian cells exhibit complex, but intricate cellular responses to genotoxic stress, including cell cycle checkpoints, DNA repair and apoptosis. Inactivation of these important biological events may result in genomic instability and cell transformation, as well as alterations of therapeutic sensitivity. Gadd45a, a p53- and BRCA1-regulated stress-inducible gene, has been characterized as one of the important players that participate in cellular response to a variety of DNA damage agents. Interestingly, the signaling machinery that regulates Gadd45a induction by genotoxic stress involves both p53-dependent and -independent pathways; the later may employ BRCA1-related or MAP kinase-mediated signals. Gadd45a protein has been reported to interact with multiple important cellular proteins, including Cdc2 protein kinase, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), p21Waf1/Cip1 protein, core histone protein and MTK/MEKK4, an up-stream activator of the JNK/SAPK pathway, indicating that Gadd45a may play important roles in the control of cell cycle checkpoint, DNA repair process, and signaling transduction. The importance of Gadd45a in maintaining genomic integrity is well manifested by the demonstration that disruption of endogenous Gadd45a in mice results in genomic instability and increased carcinogenesis. Therefore, Gadd45a appears to be an important component in the cellular defense network that is required for maintenance of genomic stability.     

Neural tube development requires the cooperation of p53- and Gadd45a-associated pathways

BACKGROUND: Numerous genetically engineered mouse models for neural tube defects (NTDs) exist, and some of the implicated proteins are functionally related. For example, the growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible protein Gadd45a and tumor suppressor p53 are functionally similar, and both are involved in neural tube development (Gadd45a- and Trp53-null embryos show low levels of exencephaly). To assess their roles in neural tube development, we generated double-null mice from Gadd45a- and Trp53-null mice, as well as from cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (Cdkn1a) (p21)-null and xeroderma pigmentosum group C (XPC)-null mice that do not show spontaneous exencephaly. METHODS: Gadd45a-, Trp53-, Cdkn1a-, and XPC-null mice were crossed to generate several double-null mouse models. Embryos (embryonic day [ED] 16-18) from the single- and double-null crosses were scored for NTDs. RESULTS: Deletion of both Gadd45a and Trp53 in mice increased exencephaly frequencies compared to the deletion of either single gene (34.0% in Gadd45a/Trp53-null compared to 8.4% and 9.1% in the Gadd45a- and Trp53-null embryos, respectively). Furthermore, although deletion of another p53-regulated gene, Cdkn1a, is not associated with exencephaly, in conjunction with Gadd45a deletion, the exencephaly frequencies are increased (30.5% in the Gadd45a/Cdkn1a-null embryos) and are similar to those in the Gadd45a/Trp53-null embryos. Although XPC deletion increased exencephaly frequencies in Trp53-null embryos, XPC deletion did not increase the exencephaly frequencies in Gadd45a-null embryos. CONCLUSIONS: The increased genetic liability to exencephaly in the Gadd45a/Trp53- and Gadd45a/Cdkn1a-null embryos may be related to the disruption of multiple cellular pathways associated with Gadd45a and p53.     

Loading and Unloading: Orchestrating Centrosome Duplication and Spindle Assembly by Ran/Crm1

The cell cycle is an intricate process of DNA replication and cell division thatconcludes with the formation of two genetically equivalent daughter cells. In thisprogression, the centrosome is duplicated once and only once during the G1/S transitionto produce the bipolar spindle and ensure proper chromosome segregation. The presenceof multiple centrosomes in cancer cells suggests that this process is mis-regulated duringcarcinogenesis. This suggests that certain factors exist that license the progression ofcentrosome duplication and serve to inhibit further duplications during a single cell cycle.Recent studies suggest that the Ran/Crm1 complex not only regulates nucleocytoplasmictransport but is also independently involved in mitotic spindle assembly. Factors that arecapable of interacting with Ran/Crm1 through their nuclear export sequences, such ascyclins/cdks, p53 and Brca1/2, may potentially function as centrosome checkpoints akinto the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints of the cell cycle. Our recent findings indicate thatnucleophosmin, a protein whose trafficking is mediated by the Ran/Crm1 network, is oneof such checkpoint factors for maintaining proper centrosome duplication. We proposethat Ran/Crm1 may act as a ‘loading dock’ to coordinate various checkpoint factors inregulating the fidelity of centrosome duplication during cell cycle progression, and thedisruption of these processes may lead to genomic instability and an acceleration ofoncogenesis.     

中心体异常和肿瘤

中心体是紧靠细胞核的小体积细胞器,由中心粒和中心粒外周基质(PCM)组成.中心体的蛋白质组成、形态、大小和位置随细胞周期不断发生变化.中心体复制过程与细胞核内其他事件相耦合,并与DNA复制一样,以半保留方式复制.现已发现了许多中心体蛋白及与中心体复制相关的蛋白激酶,调控着中心体复制的各个步骤.中心体复制还受p53,Rb,p21,Gadd45和Brca1/2等多个负性基因调节,中心体异常与基因组不稳定性存在相关性,并有可能与肿瘤发生过程相关.     

Spontaneous chromosome loss in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is suppressed by DNA damage checkpoint functions.

Genomic instability is one of the hallmarks of cancer cells and is often the causative factor in revealing recessive gene mutations that progress cells along the pathway to unregulated growth. Genomic instability can take many forms, including aneuploidy and changes in chromosome structure. Chromosome loss, loss and reduplication, and deletions are the majority events that result in loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Defective DNA replication, repair, and recombination can significantly increase the frequency of spontaneous genomic instability. Recently, DNA damage checkpoint functions that operate during the S-phase checkpoint have been shown to suppress spontaneous chromosome rearrangements in haploid yeast strains. To further study the role of DNA damage checkpoint functions in genomic stability, we have determined chromosome loss in DNA damage checkpoint-deficient yeast strains. We have found that the DNA damage checkpoints are essential for preserving the normal chromosome number and act synergistically with homologous recombination functions to ensure that chromosomes are segregated correctly to daughter cells. Failure of either of these processes increases LOH events. However, loss of the G2/M checkpoint does not result in an increase in chromosome loss, suggesting that it is the various S-phase DNA damage checkpoints that suppress chromosome loss. The mec1 checkpoint function mutant, defective in the yeast ATR homolog, results in increased recombination through a process that is distinct from that operative in wild-type cells.     

Multiple functions of the S-phase checkpoint mediator

There is mounting evidence that replication defects are the major source of spontaneous genomic instability in cells, and that S-phase checkpoints are the principal defense against such instability. The S-phase checkpoint mediator protein Mrc1/Claspin mediates the checkpoint response to replication stress by facilitating phosphorylation of effector kinase by a sensor kinase. In this review, the multiple functions and the regulation of the S-phase checkpoint mediator are discussed.     

Centrosome duplication proceeds during mimosine-induced G1 cell cycle arrest

Centrosome duplication must remain coordinated with cell cycle progression to ensure the formation of a strictly bipolar mitotic spindle, but the mechanisms that regulate this coordination are poorly understood. Previous work has shown that prolonged S-phase is permissive for centrosome duplication, but prolonging either G2 or M-phase cannot support duplication. To examine whether G1 is permissive for centrosome duplication, we release serum-starved G0 cells into mimosine, which delays the cell cycle in G1. We find that in mimosine, centrosome duplication does occur, albeit slowly compared with cells that progress into S-phase; centrosome duplication in mimosine-treated cells also proceeds in the absence of a rise in Cdk2 kinase activity normally associated with the G1/S transition. CHO cells arrested with mimosine can also assemble more than four centrioles (termed "centrosome amplification"), but the extent of centrosome amplification during prolonged G1 is decreased compared to cells that enter S-phase and activate the Cdk2-cyclin complex. Together, our results suggest a model, which predicts that entry into S-phase and the rise in Cdk2 activity associated with this transition are not absolutely required to initiate centrosome duplication, but rather, serve to entrain the centrosome reproduction cycle with cell cycle progression.     

ECRG2 disruption leads to centrosome amplification and spindle checkpoint defects contributing chromosome instability

Cancer cells contain an abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidy), which is a prevalent form of genetic instability in human cancers. Abnormal amplification of centrosomes and defects of spindle assembly checkpoint are the major causes of chromosome instability in cancer cells. Here we present biochemical evidence to suggest a role of ECRG2, a novel tumor suppressor gene, in maintaining chromosome stability. ECRG2 localized to centrosomes during interphase and kinetochores during mitosis. Further analysis revealed that ECRG2 participates in centrosome amplification in a p53-dependent manner. Depletion of ECRG2 not only destabilized p53, down-regulated p21, and increased the cyclin E/CDK2 activity, thus initiating centrosome amplification, but also abolished the ability of p53 localize to centrosomes. Overexpression of ECRG2 restored the p53-dependent suppression of centrosome duplication. Furthermore, ECRG2-depleted cells show severely disrupted spindle phenotype but fail to maintain the mitotic arrest due to minimal BUBR1 protein levels. Taken together, our results indicate that ECRG2 is important for ensuring centrosome duplication, spindle assembly checkpoint, and accurate chromosome segregation, and its depletion may contribute to chromosome instability and aneuploidy in human cancers.     

Replication fork integrity and intra-S phase checkpoint suppress gene amplification

Gene amplification is a phenotype-causing form of chromosome instability and is initiated by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Cells with mutant p53 lose G1/S checkpoint and are permissive to gene amplification. In this study we show that mammalian cells become proficient for spontaneous gene amplification when the function of the DSB repair protein complex MRN (Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1) is impaired. Cells with impaired MRN complex experienced severe replication stress and gained substrates for gene amplification during replication, as evidenced by the increase of replication-associated single-stranded breaks that were converted to DSBs most likely through replication fork reversal. Impaired MRN complex directly compromised ATM/ATR-mediated checkpoints and allowed cells to progress through cell cycle in the presence of DSBs. Such compromised intra-S phase checkpoints promoted gene amplification independently from mutant p53. Finally, cells adapted to endogenous replication stress by globally suppressing genes for DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Our results indicate that the MRN complex suppresses gene amplification by stabilizing replication forks and by securing DNA damage response to replication-associated DSBs.     

Pin1 regulates centrosome duplication, and its overexpression induces centrosome amplification, chromosome instability, and oncogenesis

Phosphorylation on Ser/Thr-Pro motifs is a major mechanism regulating many events involved in cell proliferation and transformation, including centrosome duplication, whose defects have been implicated in oncogenesis. Certain phosphorylated Ser/Thr-Pro motifs can exist in two distinct conformations whose conversion in certain proteins is catalyzed specifically by the prolyl isomerase Pin1. Pin1 is prevalently overexpressed in human cancers and is important for the activation of multiple oncogenic pathways, and its deletion suppresses the ability of certain oncogenes to induce cancer in mice. However, little is known about the role of Pin1 in centrosome duplication and the significance of Pin1 overexpression in cancer development in vivo. Here we show that Pin1 overexpression correlates with centrosome amplification in human breast cancer tissues. Furthermore, Pin1 localizes to and copurifies with centrosomes in interphase but not mitotic cells. Moreover, Pin1 ablation in mouse embryonic fibroblasts drastically delays centrosome duplication without affecting DNA synthesis and Pin1 inhibition also suppresses centrosome amplification in S-arrested CHO cells. In contrast, overexpression of Pin1 drives centrosome duplication and accumulation, resulting in chromosome missegregation, aneuploidy, and transformation in nontransformed NIH 3T3 cells. More importantly, transgenic overexpression of Pin1 in mouse mammary glands also potently induces centrosome amplification, eventually leading to mammary hyperplasia and malignant mammary tumors with overamplified centrosomes. These results demonstrate for the first time that the phosphorylation-specific isomerase Pin1 regulates centrosome duplication and its deregulation can induce centrosome amplification, chromosome instability, and oncogenesis.     

P53, cyclin-dependent kinase and abnormal amplification of centrosomes

Centrosomes play a critical role in formation of bipolar mitotic spindles, an essential event for accurate chromosome segregation into daughter cells. Numeral abnormalities of centrosomes (centrosome amplification) occur frequently in cancers, and are considered to be the major cause of chromosome instability, which accelerates acquisition of malignant phenotypes during tumor progression. Loss or mutational inactivation of p53 tumor suppressor protein, one of the most common mutations found in cancers, results in a high frequency of centrosome amplification in part via allowing the activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 2-cyclin E (as well as CDK2-cyclin A) which is a key factor for the initiation of centrosome duplication. In this review, the role of centrosome amplification in tumor progression, and mechanistic view of how centrosomes are amplified in cells through focusing on loss of p53 and aberrant activities of CDK2-cyclins will be discussed.     

Haploinsufficiency of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1-mediated poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation for centrosome duplication

The centrosome plays a vital role in maintaining chromosomal stability. Known as the microtubule organizing center, the centrosome is involved in the formation of spindle poles during mitosis, which ensures the distribution of the correct number of chromosomes to daughter cells. Aberrant centrosome duplication could cause centrosome amplification and chromosomal instability. We have previously shown that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is important for centrosome function and chromosomal stability. In this study, we used PARP-1(+/+), PARP-1(+/-) and PARP-1(-/-) primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts and found that the level of PARP-1 gene dosage correlates with PARP activity and the in vivo level of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, which could explain the mechanism by which PARP-1 haploinsufficiency affects centrosome duplication and chromosomal stability. Our results emphasize that correct regulation of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation levels in vivo is important for maintenance of proper centrosome duplication and chromosomal stability.     

Centrosome abnormalities during a Chlamydia trachomatis infection are caused by dysregulation of the normal duplication pathway

The presence of supernumerary centrosomes in cells infected with Chlamydia trachomatis may provide a mechanism to explain the association of C. trachomatis genital infection with cervical cancer. We show that the amplified centrosomal foci induced during a chlamydial infection contain both centriolar and pericentriolar matrix markers, demonstrating that they are bona fide centrosomes. As there were multiple immature centrioles but approximately one mature centriole per cell, aborted cytokinesis alone cannot account for centrosome amplification during a chlamydial infection. Production of supernumerary centrosomes required the kinase activities of Cdk2 and Plk4, which are known regulators of centrosome duplication, and progression through S-phase, which is the stage in the cell cycle when duplication of the centrosome occurs. These requirements indicate that centrosome amplification during a chlamydial infection depends on the host centrosome duplication pathway, which normally produces a single procentriole from each template centriole. However, C. trachomatis induces a loss of numerical control so that multiple procentrioles are formed per template.     

The SCF ubiquitin ligase protein slimb regulates centrosome duplication in Drosophila

The duplication of the centrosome is a key event in the cell-division cycle. Although defects in centrosome duplication are thought to contribute to genomic instability [1-3] and are a hallmark of certain transformed cells and human cancer [4-6], the mechanism responsible for centrosome duplication is not understood. Recent experiments have established that centrosome duplication requires the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2) and cyclins E and A [7-9]. The stability of cyclin E is regulated by the ubiquitin ligase SCF, which is a protein complex composed of Skp1, Cdc53 (Cullin) and F-box proteins [10-12]. The Skp1 and Cullin components have been detected on mammalian centrosomes, and shown to be essential for centrosome duplication and separation in Xenopus [13]. Here, we report that Slimb, an F-box protein that targets proteins to the SCFcomplex [14,15], plays a role in limiting centrosome replication. We found that, in the fruit fly Drosophila, the hypomorphic mutation slimb(crd) causes the appearance of additional centrosomes and mitotic defects in mutant larval neuroblasts.     

DNA synthesis at individual replication forks requires the essential initiation factor Cdc45p

Cdc45p assembles at replication origins before initia tion and is required for origin firing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A heat-inducible cdc45 degron mutant was constructed that promotes rapid degradation of Cdc45p at the restrictive temperature. Consistent with a role in initiation, loss of Cdc45p in G(1) prevents all detectable DNA replication without preventing subsequent entry into mitosis. Loss of Cdc45p activity during S-phase blocks S-phase completion but not activation of replication checkpoints. Using density substitution, we show that after allowing replication fork establishment, Cdc45p inactivation prevents the subsequent progression of individual replication forks. This provides the first direct functional evidence that Cdc45p plays an essential role during elongation. Thus, like the large T antigen in SV40 replication, Cdc45p plays a central role in both initiation and elongation phases of chromosomal DNA replication.