dBigH1, a second histone H1 in Drosophila,and the consequences for histone fold nomenclature

Recently, Pérez-Montero and colleagues (Developmental cell, 26: 578–590, 2013) described the occurrence of a new histone H1 variant (dBigH1) in Drosophila. The presence of unusual acidic amino acid patches at the N-terminal end of dBigH1 is in contrast to the arginine patches that exist at the N- and C-terminal domains of other histone H1-related proteins found in the sperm of some organisms. This departure from the strictly lysine-rich composition of the somatic histone H1 raises a question about the true definition of its protein members. Their minimal essential requirements appear to be the presence of a lysine- and alanine–rich, intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain, with a highly helicogenic potential upon binding to the linker DNA regions of chromatin. In metazoans, specific targeting of these regions is further achieved by a linker histone fold domain (LHFD), distinctively different from the characteristic core histone fold domain (CHFD) of the nucleosome core histones.     

组蛋白修饰在染色质复制过程中的作用

真核生物中的DNA复制,不但要保证DNA编码的基因组信息高保真复制,也要保证染色质结构所蕴含的表观遗传组稳定传递,这个过程对于维持基因组的完整性和稳定性至关重要。时至今日,人们对DNA复制的机制已经有了深入的认识,但是对染色质复制以及表观遗传信息传递的了解才刚刚开始。组蛋白是染色质结构中最主要的蛋白组成部分,其上面丰富的转录后修饰是表观遗传调控的核心方式之一。从最近几年组蛋白的修饰研究进展入手,主要综述在DNA复制过程中组蛋白修饰如何参与染色质复制的调控。     

Chromatin fiber folding: requirement for the histone H4 N-terminal tail

We have developed a self-assembly system for nucleosome arrays in which recombinant, post-translationally unmodified histone proteins are combined with DNA of defined-sequence to form chromatin higher-order structure. The nucleosome arrays obtained are highly homogeneous and sediment at 53S when maximally folded in 1mM or 100mM MgCl(2). The folding properties are comparable to established systems. Analytical ultracentrifugation is used to determine the consequence of individual histone tail domain deletions on array folding. Fully compacted chromatin fibers are obtained with any one of the histone tails deleted with the exception of the H4 N terminus. The region of the H4 tail, which mediates compaction, resides in the stretch of amino acids 14-19.     

Regulation of histone H3K4 methylation in brain development and disease

The growing list of mutations implicated in monogenic disorders of the developing brain includes at least seven genes (ARX, CUL4B, KDM5A, KDM5C, KMT2A, KMT2C, KMT2D) with loss-of-function mutations affecting proper regulation of histone H3 lysine 4 methylation, a chromatin mark which on a genome-wide scale is broadly associated with active gene expression, with its mono-, di- and trimethylated forms differentially enriched at promoter and enhancer and other regulatory sequences. In addition to these rare genetic syndromes, dysregulated H3K4 methylation could also play a role in the pathophysiology of some cases diagnosed with autism or schizophrenia, two conditions which on a genome-wide scale are associated with H3K4 methylation changes at hundreds of loci in a subject-specific manner. Importantly, the reported alterations for some of the diseased brain specimens included a widespread broadening of H3K4 methylation profiles at gene promoters, a process that could be regulated by the UpSET(KMT2E/MLL5)-histone deacetylase complex. Furthermore, preclinical studies identified maternal immune activation, parental care and monoaminergic drugs as environmental determinants for brain-specific H3K4 methylation. These novel insights into the epigenetic risk architectures of neurodevelopmental disease will be highly relevant for efforts aimed at improved prevention and treatment of autism and psychosis spectrum disorders.     

The role of DNA methylation,nucleosome occupancy and histone modifications in paramutation

Paramutation is the transfer of epigenetic information between alleles that leads to a heritable change in expression of one of these alleles. Paramutation at the tissue‐specifically expressed maize (Zea mays) b1 locus involves the low‐expressing B′ and high‐expressing B‐I allele. Combined in the same nucleus, B′ heritably changes B‐I into B′. A hepta‐repeat located 100‐kb upstream of the b1 coding region is required for paramutation and for high b1 expression. The role of epigenetic modifications in paramutation is currently not well understood. In this study, we show that the B′ hepta‐repeat is DNA‐hypermethylated in all tissues analyzed. Importantly, combining B′ and B‐I in one nucleus results in de novo methylation of the B‐I repeats early in plant development. These findings indicate a role for hepta‐repeat DNA methylation in the establishment and maintenance of the silenced B′ state. In contrast, nucleosome occupancy, H3 acetylation, and H3K9 and H3K27 methylation are mainly involved in tissue‐specific regulation of the hepta‐repeat. Nucleosome depletion and H3 acetylation are tissue‐specifically regulated at the B‐I hepta‐repeat and associated with enhancement of b1 expression. H3K9 and H3K27 methylation are tissue‐specifically localized at the B′ hepta‐repeat and reinforce the silenced B′ chromatin state. The B′ coding region is H3K27 dimethylated in all tissues analyzed, indicating a role in the maintenance of the silenced B′ state. Taken together, these findings provide insight into the mechanisms underlying paramutation and tissue‐specific regulation of b1 at the level of chromatin structure.     

Distinct effects of histone H1 and non-histone chromosomal proteins on the structure of nucleosomes and the chromatin fibre in solution

In this study we attempt to differentiate between the effects of the non-histone chromosomal proteins and histone H1 on the structure of the nucleosomes and the chromatin fibre in solution. The properties of chromatin preparations with different histone H1 and non-histone protein compositions were compared using circular dichroism and flow linear dichroism and the following conclusions were drawn. When histone H1 is absent the non-histone proteins partially prevent the unfolding of the nucleosomes at low ionic strength. The complete blocking of this unfolding, however, is accomplished only in the presence of histone H1. The non-histone proteins do not affect the orientation of the nucleosomes along the fibre axis. Only histone H1 can maintain the positive anisotropy of the chromatin fibre.     

The right place at the right time: chaperoning core histone variants

Histone proteins dynamically regulate chromatin structure and epigenetic signaling to maintain cell homeostasis. These processes require controlled spatial and temporal deposition and eviction of histones by their dedicated chaperones. With the evolution of histone variants, a network of functionally specific histone chaperones has emerged. Molecular details of the determinants of chaperone specificity for different histone variants are only slowly being resolved. A complete understanding of these processes is essential to shed light on the genuine biological roles of histone variants, their chaperones, and their impact on chromatin dynamics.     

Prediction of an HMG-box fold in the C-terminal domain of histone H1: insights into its role in DNA condensation

In eukaryotes, histone H1 promotes the organization of polynucleosome filaments into chromatin fibers, thus contributing to the formation of an important structural framework responsible for various DNA transaction processes. The H1 protein consists of a short N-terminal "nose," a central globular domain, and a highly basic C-terminal domain. Structure prediction of the C-terminal domain using fold recognition methods reveals the presence of an HMG-box-like fold. We recently showed by extensive site-directed and deletion mutagenesis studies that a 34 amino acid segment encompassing the three S/TPKK motifs, within the C-terminal domain, is responsible for DNA condensing properties of H1. The position of these motifs in the predicted structure corresponds exactly to the DNA-binding segments of HMG-box-containing proteins such as Lef-1 and SRY. Previous analyses have suggested that histone H1 is likely to bend DNA bound to the C-terminal domain, directing the path of linker DNA in chromatin. Prediction of the structure of this domain provides a framework for understanding the higher order of chromatin organization.     

Evidence for the nuclear import of histones H3.1 and H4 as monomers

Newly synthesised histones are thought to dimerise in the cytosol and undergo nuclear import in complex with histone chaperones. Here, we provide evidence that human H3.1 and H4 are imported into the nucleus as monomers. Using a tether‐and‐release system to study the import dynamics of newly synthesised histones, we find that cytosolic H3.1 and H4 can be maintained as stable monomeric units. Cytosolically tethered histones are bound to importin‐alpha proteins (predominantly IPO4), but not to histone‐specific chaperones NASP, ASF1a, RbAp46 (RBBP7) or HAT1, which reside in the nucleus in interphase cells. Release of monomeric histones from their cytosolic tether results in rapid nuclear translocation, IPO4 dissociation and incorporation into chromatin at sites of replication. Quantitative analysis of histones bound to individual chaperones reveals an excess of H3 specifically associated with sNASP, suggesting that NASP maintains a soluble, monomeric pool of H3 within the nucleus and may act as a nuclear receptor for newly imported histone. In summary, we propose that histones H3 and H4 are rapidly imported as monomeric units, forming heterodimers in the nucleus rather than the cytosol.     

Nucleosome dyad determines the H1 C-terminus collapse on distinct DNA arms

1. Download : Download high-res image (204KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Assembly of DNA onto the histone octamer facilitates the B-to-Z transition

Nucleosomal core particles containing the right- and left-handed conformations of DNA were examined for their ability to support the BZ or ZB transition. Nucleosomes were assembled onto the B- and Z-conformations of poly[d(Gm5C)] and the B-conformation of poly[d(GC)] as previously described (1). Absorbance and circular dichroic spectroscopy indicated that the DNA on all three core particle populations could undergo the conformational BZ transition. Further, the right- to left-handed transition for both poly[d(Gm5C)] and poly[d(GC)] appeared to be facilitated by the DNAs association with the histone octamer. The DNA remained associated with the protein core subsequent to the transition, and electron microscopy and sedimentation velocity analysis indicated that there were no gross changes in nucleosomal structure. However, a change in the sedimentation value of the poly[d(Gm5C)] core particles was detected when the conformation of the DNA was altered from B to Z, resulting in a lower S20,w value for the Z-form particles than for the corresponding B-form particles.     

Structure of the Drosophila nucleosome core particle highlights evolutionary constraints on the H2A-H2B histone dimer

We determined the 2.45 A crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle from Drosophila melanogaster and compared it to that of Xenopus laevis bound to the identical 147 base-pair DNA fragment derived from human alpha-satellite DNA. Differences between the two structures primarily reflect 16 amino acid substitutions between species, 15 of which are in histones H2A and H2B. Four of these involve histone tail residues, resulting in subtly altered protein-DNA interactions that exemplify the structural plasticity of these tails. Of the 12 substitutions occurring within the histone core regions, five involve small, solvent-exposed residues not involved in intraparticle interactions. The remaining seven involve buried hydrophobic residues, and appear to have coevolved so as to preserve the volume of side chains within the H2A hydrophobic core and H2A-H2B dimer interface. Thus, apart from variations in the histone tails, amino acid substitutions that differentiate Drosophila from Xenopus histones occur in mutually compensatory combinations. This highlights the tight evolutionary constraints exerted on histones since the vertebrate and invertebrate lineages diverged.     

Accessibility of histone H1° and its structural domains to antibody binding in extended and folded chromatin

The aim of this work was to study the accessibility of histone H1° and its structural domains to antibody binding in high molecular mass chromatin fragments of different conformations. Three types of specific antibody populations were used: (1) anti-H1° which reacted with antigenic determinants situated along the whole polypeptide chain, (2) anti-GH5 or anti-GH1° which recognized epitopes located in the globular region of H1° and (3) anti-C-tail antibodies reacting specifically with fragment 99–193 of the protein molecule. The immunoreactivity of the chromatin-bound antigen was investigated by solid-phase ELISA performed on glutaraldehyde-cross-linked chromatin and by an inhibition assay carried out with native chromatin in solution. The results of both methods were unidirectional and showed that: (1) the accessibility of H1° did not change with the compaction of the fiber; (2) the G-domain was not accessible to antibodies either in the relaxed or in the condensed state of the fragments, (3) the binding of the C-terminus-specific antibodies was different for isolated monosomes and for the chromatin fiber and (4) the degree of exposure of the epitopes of H1° in chromatin was much less than that of histone H1.Abbreviations ELISA Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - G-domain Globular domain - IgG Immunoglobulin G - SDS Sodium Dodecylsulphate     

Developmental and tissue expression patterns of histone macroH2A1 subtypes

MacroH2A is a novel nucleosomal core histone that contains a large nonhistone region and a region that closely resembles a full length histone H2A. We have cloned a cDNA that contains the entire coding region of macroH2A1.2, one of the two identified subtypes of macroH2A1. MacroH2A1.2 was found to differ from the other known subtype, macroH2A1.1, in a single segment of the nonhistone region. MacroH2A1 specific antibodies revealed relatively high levels of both subtypes in adult liver and kidney. MacroH2A1.1 was much lower in fetal liver and kidney in comparison to their adult counterparts, and was not detected in adult thymus and testis, tissues with active cell division and differentiation. Both subtypes were present at very low levels or absent from mouse embryonic stem cells maintained in an undifferentiated state by growth in the presence of leukemia inhibitory factor. MacroH2A1.2 increased when the embryonic stem cells were induced to differentiate in vitro, while macroH2A1.1 remained undetectable. These results support the idea that macroH2A1.1 and macroH2A1.2 are functionally distinct, and suggest that changes in their expression may play a role in developmentally regulated changes in chromatin structure and function. J. Cell. Biochem. 65:107–113. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Structures and interactions of the core histone tail domains

The core histone tail domains are "master control switches" that help define the structural and functional characteristics of chromatin at many levels. The tails modulate DNA accessibility within the nucleosome, are essential for stable folding of oligonucleosome arrays into condensed chromatin fibers, and are important for fiber-fiber interactions involved in higher order structures. Many nuclear signaling pathways impinge upon the tail domains, resulting in posttranslational modifications that are likely to alter the charge, structure, and/or interactions of the core histone tails or to serve as targets for the binding of ancillary proteins or other enzymatic functions. However, currently we have only a marginal understanding of the molecular details of core histone tail conformations and contacts. Here we review data related to the structures and interactions of the core histone tail domains and how these domains and posttranslational modifications therein may define the structure and function of chromatin.     

Distinct properties of the two putative "globular domains" of the yeast linker histone, Hho1p

The putative linker histone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hho1p, has two regions of sequence (GI and GII) that are homologous to the single globular domains of linker histones H1 and H5 in higher eukaryotes. However, the two Hho1p "domains" differ with respect to the conservation of basic residues corresponding to the two putative DNA-binding sites (sites I and II) on opposite faces of the H5 globular domain. We find that GI can protect chromatosome-length DNA, like the globular domains of H1 and H5 (GH1 and GH5), but GII does not protect. However, GII, like GH1 and GH5, binds preferentially (and with higher affinity than GI) to four-way DNA junctions in the presence of excess linear DNA competitor, and binds more tightly than GI to linker-histone-depleted chromatin. Surprisingly, in 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0), GII is largely unfolded, whereas GI, like GH1 and GH5, is structured, with a high alpha-helical content. However, in the presence of high concentrations of large tetrahedral anions (phosphate, sulphate, perchlorate) GII is also folded; the anions presumably mimic DNA in screening the positive charge. This raises the possibility that chromatin-bound Hho1p may be bifunctional, with two folded nucleosome-binding domains.