BRCA1-directed,enhanced and aberrant homologous recombination: Mechanism and potential treatment strategies

Despite intense studies, questions still remain regarding the molecular mechanisms leading to the development of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Research focused on elucidating the role of the breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) in the DNA damage response may be of the most critical importance to understanding these processes. The BRCA1 protein has an N-terminal RING domain possessing E3 ubiquitin-ligase activity and a C-terminal BRCT domain involved in binding specific phosphoproteins. These domains are involved directly or indirectly in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. As the two terminal domains of BRCA1 represent two separate entities, understanding how these domains communicate and are functionally altered in regards to DSB repair is critical for understanding the development of BRCA1-related breast and ovarian cancers and for developing novel therapeutics. Herein, we review recent findings of how altered functions of these domains might lead to cancer through a mechanism of increased aberrant homologous recombination and possible implications for the development of BRCA1 inhibitors.Key words: BRCT, DNA repair, peptide, radiation, RING, ubiquitylation     

Recognition of DNA double strand breaks by the BRCA1 tumor suppressor network

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occur in response to both endogenous and exogenous genotoxic stress. Inappropriate repair of DSBs can lead to either loss of viability or to chromosomal alterations that increase the likelihood of cancer development. In strong support of this assertion, many cancer predisposition syndromes stem from germline mutations in genes involved in DNA DSB repair. Among the most prominent of such tumor suppressor genes are the Breast Cancer 1 and Breast Cancer 2 genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2), which are mutated in familial forms of breast and ovarian cancer. Recent findings implicate BRCA1 as a central component of several distinct macromolecular protein complexes, each dedicated to distinct elements of DNA DSB repair and tumor suppression. Emerging evidence has shed light on some of the molecular recognition processes that are responsible for targeting BRCA1 and its associated partners to DNA and chromatin directly flanking DSBs. These events are required for BRCA1-dependent DNA repair and tumor suppression. Thus, a detailed temporal and spatial knowledge of how breaks are recognized and repaired has profound implications for understanding processes related to the genesis of malignancy and to its treatment.     

Mouse models for BRCA1 associated tumorigenesis: From fundamental insights to preclinical utility

Germline mutations in BRCA1 result in a significant predisposition for breast and ovarian cancer, with frequent LOH of the remaining wild type allele. Soon after the identification of BRCA1, several different knockout mice were generated to study its biological function in vivo. BRCA1, which is involved in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, appeared to be essential for embryonic proliferation and survival during mid-gestation. In contrast to human mutation carriers however, heterozygous mouse mutants did not show spontaneous cancer development. Therefore, a number of conditional mouse models were developed. While tumors of these mice show varying degrees of similarity with their human counterparts, two mouse models develop mammary tumors that lack expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors and ERBB2. This ‘triple negative’ signature is a characteristic feature of BRCA1-associated breast cancers, which can therefore not be treated with endocrine agents or ERBB2-targeting therapeutics. Promising drugs for treating BRCA1-mutated tumors include platinum compounds and PARP inhibitors, which are specifically toxic to DSB repair deficient cells. Although encouraging results have been reported, recent findings indicate that BRCA1/2 deficient ovarian tumors can escape from such targeted treatment by genetic reversion. This resistance mechanism might be studied in future mouse tumor models based on Brca1 truncating mutations mimicking defined human founder mutations.     

RAD51C germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer cases from high-risk families

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most well-known breast cancer susceptibility genes. Additional genes involved in DNA repair have been identified as predisposing to breast cancer. One such gene, RAD51C, is essential for homologous recombination repair. Several likely pathogenic RAD51C mutations have been identified in BRCA1- and BRCA2-negative breast and ovarian cancer families. We performed complete sequencing of RAD51C in germline DNA of 286 female breast and/or ovarian cancer cases with a family history of breast and ovarian cancers, who had previously tested negative for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. We screened 133 breast cancer cases, 119 ovarian cancer cases, and 34 with both breast and ovarian cancers. Fifteen DNA sequence variants were identified; including four intronic, one 5' UTR, one promoter, three synonymous, and six non-synonymous variants. None were truncating. The in-silico SIFT and Polyphen programs were used to predict possible pathogenicity of the six non-synonomous variants based on sequence conservation. G153D and T287A were predicted to be likely pathogenic. Two additional variants, A126T and R214C alter amino acids in important domains of the protein such that they could be pathogenic. Two-hybrid screening and immunoblot analyses were performed to assess the functionality of these four non-synonomous variants in yeast. The RAD51C-G153D protein displayed no detectable interaction with either XRCC3 or RAD51B, and RAD51C-R214C displayed significantly decreased interaction with both XRCC3 and RAD51B (p<0.001). Immunoblots of RAD51C-Gal4 activation domain fusion peptides showed protein levels of RAD51C-G153D and RAD51C-R214C that were 50% and 60% of the wild-type, respectively. Based on these data, the RAD51C-G153D variant is likely to be pathogenic, while the RAD51C- R214C variant is hypomorphic of uncertain pathogenicity. These results provide further support that RAD51C is a rare breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene.     

BRCA1 tumor suppressor network: focusing on its tail

ABSTRACT: Germline mutations of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene are a major cause of familial breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 plays critical roles in the DNA damage response that regulates activities of multiple repair and checkpoint pathways for maintaining genome stability. The BRCT domains of BRCA1 constitute a phospho-peptide binding domain recognizing a phospho-SPxF motif (S, serine; P, proline; × varies; F, phenylalanine). The BRCT domains are frequently targeted by clinically important mutations and most of these mutations disrupt the binding surface of the BRCT domains to phosphorylated peptides. The BRCT domain and its capability to bind phosphorylated protein is required for the tumor suppressor function of BRCA1. Through its BRCT phospho-binding ability BRCA1 forms at least three mutually exclusive complexes by binding to phosphorylated proteins Abraxas, Bach1 and CTIP. The A, B and C complexes, at lease partially undertake BRCA1's role in mechanisms of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair that maintain genome stability, thus may play important roles in BRCA1's tumor suppressor function.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 protect against oxidative DNA damage converted into double-strand breaks during DNA replication

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are predisposed to develop breast and ovarian cancers, but the reasons for this tissue specificity are unknown. Breast epithelial cells are known to contain elevated levels of oxidative DNA damage, triggered by hormonally driven growth and its effect on cell metabolism. BRCA1- or BRCA2-deficient cells were found to be more sensitive to oxidative stress, modeled by treatment with patho-physiologic concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide exposure leads to oxidative DNA damage induced DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in BRCA-deficient cells causing them to accumulate in S-phase. In addition, after hydrogen peroxide treatment, BRCA deficient cells showed impaired Rad51 foci which are dependent on an intact BRCA1–BRCA2 pathway. These DSB resulted in an increase in chromatid-type aberrations, which are characteristic for BRCA1 and BRCA2-deficient cells. The most common result of oxidative DNA damage induced processing of S-phase DSB is an interstitial chromatid deletion, but insertions and exchanges were also seen in BRCA deficient cells. Thus, BRCA1 and BRCA2 are essential for the repair of oxidative DNA damage repair intermediates that persist into S-phase and produce DSB. The implication is that oxidative stress plays a role in the etiology of hereditary breast cancer.     

Structure of a BRCA1-BARD1 heterodimeric RING-RING complex

The RING domain of the breast and ovarian cancer tumor suppressor BRCA1 interacts with multiple cognate proteins, including the RING protein BARD1. Proper function of the BRCA1 RING domain is critical, as evidenced by the many cancer-predisposing mutations found within this domain. We present the solution structure of the heterodimer formed between the RING domains of BRCA1 and BARD1. Comparison with the RING homodimer of the V(D)J recombination-activating protein RAG1 reveals the structural diversity of complexes formed by interactions between different RING domains. The BRCA1-BARD1 structure provides a model for its ubiquitin ligase activity, illustrates how the BRCA1 RING domain can be involved in associations with multiple protein partners and provides a framework for understanding cancer-causing mutations at the molecular level.     

BRCA1-mediated repression of mutagenic end-joining of DNA double-strand breaks requires complex formation with BACH1

BACH1 (BRCA1-associated C-terminal helicase 1), the product of the BRIP1 {BRCA1 [breast cancer 1, early onset]-interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1; also known as FANCJ [FA-J (Fanconi anaemia group J) protein]} gene mutated in Fanconi anaemia patients from complementation group J, has been implicated in DNA repair and damage signalling. BACH1 exerts DNA helicase activities and physically interacts with BRCA1 and MLH1 (mutL homologue 1), which differentially control DNA DSB (double-strand break) repair processes. The present study shows that BACH1 plays a role in both HR (homologous recombination) and MMEJ (microhomology-mediated non-homologous end-joining) and reveals discrete mechanisms underlying modulation of these pathways. Our results indicate that BACH1 stimulates HR, which depends on the integrity of the helicase domain. Disruption of the BRCA1-BACH1 complex through mutation of BACH1 compromised errorfree NHEJ (non-homologous end-joining) and accelerated error-prone MMEJ. Conversely, molecular changes in BACH1 abrogating MLH1 binding interfered neither with HR nor with MMEJ. Importantly, MMEJ is a mutagenic DSB repair pathway, which is derepressed in hereditary breast and ovarian carcinomas. Since BRCA1 and BACH1 mutations targeting the BRCA1-BACH1 interaction have been associated with breast cancer susceptibility, the results of the present study thus provide evidence for a novel role of BACH1 in tumour suppression.     

BRCA1 epigenetic inactivation predicts sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy in breast and ovarian cancer

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes are associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer development. Both genes are involved in DNA repair, and tumors harboring genetic defects in them are thought to be more sensitive to DNA-damaging agents used in chemotherapy. However, as only a minority of breast and ovarian cancer patients carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, few patients are likely to benefit from these pharmacogenetic biomarkers. Herein, we show that, in cancer cell lines and xenografted tumors, BRCA1 CpG island promoter hypermethylation-associated silencing also predicts enhanced sensitivity to platinum-derived drugs to the same extent as BRCA1 mutations. Most importantly, BRCA1 hypermethylation proves to be a predictor of longer time to relapse and improved overall survival in ovarian cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin.     

乳腺癌易感蛋白BRCA1的BRCT2结构域染色质伸展活性的定位

40 %～ 5 0 %的遗传性乳腺癌和至少 80 %的既有乳腺癌又有卵巢癌家族史的患者是由BRCA1突变引起的 .BRCA1C末端含有 2个BRCT结构域 (BRCT1和BRCT2 ) ,它们与BRCA1的重要功能密切相关 .许多乳腺癌易感突变发生在BRCA1的BRCT结构域中 .利用染色质结构检测技术表明 ,BRCT结构域具有染色质伸展活性 .利用缺失突变技术构建了 6种BRCT2结构域 (175 6～ 185 2位氨基酸残基 )缺失突变体并将BRCT2结构域中与染色质伸展相关的重要区域定位到 175 6～ 180 8之间的氨基酸残基 ;用丙氨酸扫描技术构建了 6种BRCT2结构域丙氨酸扫描突变体并将重要氨基酸残基序列定位到 1784～ 1788之间的VQLCG .BRCT2结构域的定位有助于预测BRCT2结构域突变后发生乳腺癌的风险 ,也为进一步研究BRCT2结构域的功能机制提供了有用的材料 .     

BRCA1 modulates ionizing radiation-induced nuclear focus formation by the replication protein A p34 subunit

Mutations in BRCA1 account for a significant proportion of familial breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1 has been implicated in DNA damage responses including double-strand break (DSB) repair. However, its exact role in DSB repair and its functional relationship with other known repair proteins remain to be elucidated. In this study, we carried out a cytological analysis of the effect of BRCA1 on damage-induced nuclear focus formation mediated by the replication protein A (RPA). RPA is a multi-functional protein that participates in both DNA replication and various types of DNA repair including DSB repair. Following ionizing radiation (IR), RPA and BRCA1 formed punctate nuclear staining patterns that co-localized with each other, consistent with the implicated roles of both proteins in the same repair process. The number of damage-induced RPA foci in BRCA1-deficient cells, however, was significantly greater than that in BRCA1-positive cells. Moreover, the effect of BRCA1 on the RPA staining pattern appeared to be specific for IR but not ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. These data suggest that BRCA1 plays an important role in processing the RPA-associated intermediates during DSB repair.     

Hereditary breast cancer; Genetic penetrance and current status with BRCA

The most important cause of developing hereditary breast cancer is germline mutations occurring in breast cancer (BCs) susceptibility genes, for example, BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, CHEK2, PTEN, ATM, and PPM1D. Many BC susceptibility genes can be grouped into two classes, high- and low-penetrance genes, each of which interact with multiple genes and environmental factors. However, the penetrance of genes can also be represented by a spectrum, which ranges between high and low. Two of the most common susceptibility genes are BRCA1 and BRCA2, which perform vital cellular functions for repair of homologous DNA. Loss of heterozygosity accompanied by hereditary mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 increases chromosomal instability and the likelihood of cancer, as well as playing a key role in stimulating malignant transformation. With regard to pathological features, familial breast cancers caused by BRCA1 mutations usually differ from those caused by BRCA2 mutations and nonfamilial BCs. It is essential to acquire an understanding of these pathological features along with the genetic history of the patient to offer an individualized treatment. Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the main genetic and inherited factors for breast and ovarian cancer. In fact, these mutations are very important in developing early onset and increasing the risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer and responsible for 90% of hereditary BC cases. Therefore, according to the conducted studies, screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is recommended as an important marker for early detection of all patients with breast or ovarian cancer risk with family history of the disease. In this review, we summarize the role of hereditary genes, mainly BRCA1 and BRCA2, in BC.     

BRCA1-mediated signaling pathways in ovarian carcinogenesis

The link between loss or defect in functional BRCA1 and predisposition for development of ovarian and breast cancer is well established. Germ-line mutations in BRCA1 are responsible for both hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, which is around 5–10% for all breast and 10–15% of all ovarian cancer cases. However, majority of cases of ovarian cancer are sporadic in nature. The inactivation of cellular BRCA1 due to mutations or loss of heterozygosity is one of the most commonly observed events in such cases. Complement-resistant retroviral BRCA1 vector, MFG-BRCA1, is the only approved gene therapy for ovarian cancer patients by the Federal and Drug Administration. Given the limited available information, there is a need to evaluate the effects of BRCA1 on the global gene expression pattern for better understanding the etiology of the disease. Here, we use Ingenuity Pathway Knowledge Base to examine the differential pattern of global gene expression due to stable expression of BRCA1 in the ovarian cancer cell line, SKOV3. The functional analysis detected at least five major pathways that were significantly (p < 0.05) altered. These include: cell to cell signaling and interaction, cellular function and maintenance, cellular growth and proliferation, cell cycle and DNA replication, and recombination repair. In addition, we were able to detect several biologically relevant genes that are central for various signaling networks involved in cellular homeostasis; TGF-β1, TP53, c-MYC, NF-κB and TNF-α. This report provides a comprehensive rationale for tumor suppressor function(s) of BRCA1 in ovarian carcinogenesis.     

The role of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor in DNA double-strand break repair

The tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 was cloned in 1994 based on its linkage to early-onset breast and ovarian cancer. Although the BRCA1 protein has been implicated in multiple cellular functions, the precise mechanism that determines its tumor suppressor activity is not defined. Currently, the emerging picture is that BRCA1 plays an important role in maintaining genomic integrity by protecting cells from double-strand breaks (DSB) that arise during DNA replication or after DNA damage. The DSB repair pathways available in mammalian cells are homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining. BRCA1 function seems to be regulated by specific phosphorylations in response to DNA damage and we will focus this review on the roles played by BRCA1 in DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoints. Finally, we will explore the idea that tumor suppression by BRCA1 depends on its control of DNA DSB repair, resulting in the promotion of error-free and the inhibition of error-prone recombinational repair.     

BRCA1: cell cycle checkpoint, genetic instability, DNA damage response and cancer evolution

Germline mutations of the breast cancer associated gene 1 (BRCA1) predispose women to breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1 is a large protein with multiple functional domains and interacts with numerous proteins that are involved in many important biological processes/pathways. Mounting evidence indicates that BRCA1 is involved in all phases of the cell cycle and regulates orderly events during cell cycle progression. BRCA1 deficiency, consequently causes abnormalities in the S-phase checkpoint, the G₂/M checkpoint, the spindle checkpoint and centrosome duplication. The genetic instability caused by BRCA1 deficiency, however, also triggers cellular responses to DNA damage that blocks cell proliferation and induces apoptosis. Thus BRCA1 mutant cells cannot develop further into full-grown tumors unless this cellular defense is broken. Functional analysis of BRCA1 in cell cycle checkpoints, genome integrity, DNA damage response (DDR) and tumor evolution should benefit our understanding of the mechanisms underlying BRCA1 associated tumorigenesis, as well as the development of therapeutic approaches for this lethal disease.     

A New Rapid Methodological Strategy to Assess BRCA Mutational Status

Hereditary cancers account for approximately 10 % of breast and ovarian cancers. Mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, encoding two proteins involved in DNA repair, underlie most cases of such hereditary cancers. Women with BRCA mutations develop breast cancer in 50–80 % of cases and ovarian cancer in 10–40 % of cases. Assessing BRCA mutational status is needed to direct the clinical management of women with predisposition to these hereditary cancers. However, BRCA screening constitutes a bottleneck in terms of costs and time to deliver results. We developed a PCR-based assay using 73 primer pairs covering the entire coding regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. PCR primers, containing at the 5’ end the universal M13 primer sequences, were pre-spotted in 96-well plates. Following PCR, direct sequencing was performed using M13 primers, allowing to standardize the conditions. PCR amplification and sequencing were successful for each amplicon. We tested and validated the assay on 10 known gDNAs from patients with Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Our strategy is a promising time and cost-effective method to detect BRCA mutations in the clinical setting, which is essential to formulate a personalized therapy for patients with HBOC.