Probing the Mec1ATR Checkpoint Activation Mechanism with Small Peptides

Yeast Mec1, the ortholog of human ATR, is the apical protein kinase that initiates the cell cycle checkpoint in response to DNA damage and replication stress. The basal activity of Mec1 kinase is activated by cell cycle phase-specific activators. Three distinct activators stimulate Mec1 kinase using an intrinsically disordered domain of the protein. These are the Ddc1 subunit of the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp (ortholog of human and Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad9), the replication initiator Dpb11 (ortholog of human TopBP1 and S. pombe Cut5), and the multifunctional nuclease/helicase Dna2. Here, we use small peptides to determine the requirements for Mec1 activation. For Ddc1, we identify two essential aromatic amino acids in a hydrophobic environment that when fused together are proficient activators. Using this increased insight, we have been able to identify homologous motifs in S. pombe Rad9 that can activate Mec1. Furthermore, we show that a 9-amino acid Dna2-based peptide is sufficient for Mec1 activation. Studies with mutant activators suggest that binding of an activator to Mec1 is a two-step process, the first step involving the obligatory binding of essential aromatic amino acids to Mec1, followed by an enhancement in binding energy through interactions with neighboring sequences.     

Elevated Levels of the Polo Kinase Cdc5 Override the Mec1/ATR Checkpoint in Budding Yeast by Acting at Different Steps of the Signaling Pathway

Checkpoints are surveillance mechanisms that constitute a barrier to oncogenesis by preserving genome integrity. Loss of checkpoint function is an early event in tumorigenesis. Polo kinases (Plks) are fundamental regulators of cell cycle progression in all eukaryotes and are frequently overexpressed in tumors. Through their polo box domain, Plks target multiple substrates previously phosphorylated by CDKs and MAPKs. In response to DNA damage, Plks are temporally inhibited in order to maintain the checkpoint-dependent cell cycle block while their activity is required to silence the checkpoint response and resume cell cycle progression. Here, we report that, in budding yeast, overproduction of the Cdc5 polo kinase overrides the checkpoint signaling induced by double strand DNA breaks (DSBs), preventing the phosphorylation of several Mec1/ATR targets, including Ddc2/ATRIP, the checkpoint mediator Rad9, and the transducer kinase Rad53/CHK2. We also show that high levels of Cdc5 slow down DSB processing in a Rad9-dependent manner, but do not prevent the binding of checkpoint factors to a single DSB. Finally, we provide evidence that Sae2, the functional ortholog of human CtIP, which regulates DSB processing and inhibits checkpoint signaling, is regulated by Cdc5. We propose that Cdc5 interferes with the checkpoint response to DSBs acting at multiple levels in the signal transduction pathway and at an early step required to resect DSB ends.     

Cell-cycle-specific activators of the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase

Mec1 [ATR (ataxia telangiectasia mutated- and Rad3-related) in humans] is the principle kinase responsible for checkpoint activation in response to replication stress and DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The heterotrimeric checkpoint clamp, 9-1-1 (checkpoint clamp of Rad9, Rad1 and Hus1 in humans and Ddc1, Rad17 and Mec3 in S. cerevisiae; Ddc1-Mec3-Rad17) and the DNA replication initiation factor Dpb11 (human TopBP1) are the two known activators of Mec1. The 9-1-1 clamp functions in checkpoint activation in G1- and G2-phase, but its employment differs between these two phases of the cell cycle. The Ddc1 (human Rad9) subunit of the clamp directly activates Mec1 in G1-phase, an activity identified only in S. cerevisiae so far. However, in G2-phase, the 9-1-1 clamp activates the checkpoint by two mechanisms. One mechanism includes direct activation of Mec1 by the unstructured C-terminal tail of Ddc1. The second mech-anism involves the recruitment of Dpb11 by the phosphorylated C-terminal tail of Ddc1. The latter mechanism is highly conserved and also functions in response to replication stress in higher eukaryotes. In S. cerevisiae, however, both the 9-1-1 clamp and the Dpb11 are partially redundant for checkpoint activation in response to replication stress, suggesting the existence of additional activators of Mec1.     

The Dimeric Architecture of Checkpoint Kinases Mec1ATR and Tel1ATM Reveal a Common Structural Organization

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related protein kinases are key regulators controlling a wide range of cellular events. The yeast Tel1 and Mec1·Ddc2 complex (ATM and ATR-ATRIP in humans) play pivotal roles in DNA replication, DNA damage signaling, and repair. Here, we present the first structural insight for dimers of Mec1·Ddc2 and Tel1 using single-particle electron microscopy. Both kinases reveal a head to head dimer with one major dimeric interface through the N-terminal HEAT (named after Huntingtin, elongation factor 3, protein phosphatase 2A, and yeast kinase TOR1) repeat. Their dimeric interface is significantly distinct from the interface of mTOR complex 1 dimer, which oligomerizes through two spatially separate interfaces. We also observe different structural organizations of kinase domains of Mec1 and Tel1. The kinase domains in the Mec1·Ddc2 dimer are located in close proximity to each other. However, in the Tel1 dimer they are fully separated, providing potential access of substrates to this kinase, even in its dimeric form.     

Three Distinct Modes of Mec1/ATR and Tel1/ATM Activation Illustrate Differential Checkpoint Targeting during Budding Yeast Early Meiosis

Recombination and synapsis of homologous chromosomes are hallmarks of meiosis in many organisms. Meiotic recombination is initiated by Spo11-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), whereas chromosome synapsis is mediated by a tripartite structure named the synaptonemal complex (SC). Previously, we proposed that budding yeast SC is assembled via noncovalent interactions between the axial SC protein Red1, SUMO chains or conjugates, and the central SC protein Zip1. Incomplete synapsis and unrepaired DNA are monitored by Mec1/Tel1-dependent checkpoint responses that prevent exit from the pachytene stage. Here, our results distinguished three distinct modes of Mec1/Tec1 activation during early meiosis that led to phosphorylation of three targets, histone H2A at S129 (γH2A), Hop1, and Zip1, which are involved, respectively, in DNA replication, the interhomolog recombination and chromosome synapsis checkpoint, and destabilization of homology-independent centromere pairing. γH2A phosphorylation is Red1 independent and occurs prior to Spo11-induced DSBs. DSB- and Red1-dependent Hop1 phosphorylation is activated via interaction of the Red1-SUMO chain/conjugate ensemble with the Ddc1-Rad17-Mec3 (9-1-1) checkpoint complex and the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex. During SC assembly, Zip1 outcompetes 9-1-1 from the Red1-SUMO chain ensemble to attenuate Hop1 phosphorylation. In contrast, chromosome synapsis cannot attenuate DSB-dependent and Red1-independent Zip1 phosphorylation. These results reveal how DNA replication, DSB repair, and chromosome synapsis are differentially monitored by the meiotic checkpoint network.     

Yeast DNA replication protein Dpb11 activates the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1-Ddc2 protein kinase (human ATR-ATRIP) initiates a signal transduction pathway in response to DNA damage and replication stress to mediate cell cycle arrest. The yeast DNA damage checkpoint clamp Ddc1-Mec3-Rad17 (human Rad9-Hus1-Rad1: 9-1-1) is loaded around effector DNA and thereby activates Mec1 kinase. Dpb11 (Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cut5/Rad4 or human TopBP1) is an essential protein required for the initiation of DNA replication and has a role in checkpoint activation. In this study, we demonstrate that Dpb11 directly activates the Mec1 kinase in phosphorylating the downstream effector kinase Rad53 (human Chk1/2) and DNA bound RPA. However, DNA was not required for Dpb11 to function as an activator. Dpb11 and yeast 9-1-1 independently activate Mec1, but substantial synergism in activation was observed when both activators were present. Our studies suggest that Dpb11 and 9-1-1 may partially compensate for each other during yeast checkpoint function.     

检验点激酶1的研究进展

检验点激酶1(checkpointkinase1,Chk1)为一种进化保守的蛋白激酶,是细胞检验点的转导因子。当电离辐射、紫外线等引起细胞DNA损伤或者DNA复制叉停滞时Chk1活化,诱导细胞产生细胞周期阻滞、DNA修复或细胞凋亡等特征。现对Chk1的结构、功能以及病毒通过Chk1调控宿主细胞周期等方面进行简述。     

Interplays between ATM/Tel1 and ATR/Mec1 in sensing and signaling DNA double-strand breaks

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly hazardous for genome integrity because they have the potential to cause mutations, chromosomal rearrangements and genomic instability. The cellular response to DSBs is orchestrated by signal transduction pathways, known as DNA damage checkpoints, which are conserved from yeasts to humans. These pathways can sense DNA damage and transduce this information to specific cellular targets, which in turn regulate cell cycle transitions and DNA repair. The mammalian protein kinases ATM and ATR, as well as their budding yeast corresponding orthologs Tel1 and Mec1, act as master regulators of the checkpoint response to DSBs. Here, we review the early steps of DSB processing and the role of DNA-end structures in activating ATM/Tel1 and ATR/Mec1 in an orderly and reciprocal manner.     

Reconstitution of Human Claspin-mediated Phosphorylation of Chk1 by the ATR (Ataxia Telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related) Checkpoint Kinase

ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) initiates a DNA damage signaling pathway in human cells upon DNA damage induced by UV and UV-mimetic agents and in response to inhibition of DNA replication. Genetic data with human cells and in vitro data with Xenopus egg extracts have led to the conclusion that the kinase activity of ATR toward the signal-transducing kinase Chk1 depends on the mediator protein Claspin. Here we have reconstituted a Claspin-mediated checkpoint system with purified human proteins. We find that the ATR-dependent phosphorylation of Chk1, but not p53, is strongly stimulated by Claspin. Similarly, DNA containing bulky base adducts stimulates ATR kinase activity, and Claspin acts synergistically with damaged DNA to increase phosphorylation of Chk1 by ATR. Mutations in putative phosphorylation sites in the Chk1-binding domain of Claspin abolish its ability to mediate ATR phosphorylation of Chk1. We also find that a fragment of Claspin containing the Chk1-binding domain together with a domain conserved in the yeast Mrc1 orthologs of Claspin is sufficient for its mediator activity. This in vitro system recapitulates essential components of the genetically defined ATR-signaling pathway.     

Phosphoproteomics reveals a distinctive Mec1/ATR signaling response upon DNA end hyper‐resection

The Mec1/ATR kinase is crucial for genome maintenance in response to a range of genotoxic insults, but it remains unclear how it promotes context‐dependent signaling and DNA repair. Using phosphoproteomic analyses, we uncovered a distinctive Mec1/ATR signaling response triggered by extensive nucleolytic processing (resection) of DNA ends. Budding yeast cells lacking Rad9, a checkpoint adaptor and an inhibitor of resection, exhibit a selective increase in Mec1‐dependent phosphorylation of proteins associated with single‐strand DNA (ssDNA) transactions, including the ssDNA‐binding protein Rfa2, the translocase/ubiquitin ligase Uls1, and the Sgs1‐Top3‐Rmi1 (STR) complex that regulates homologous recombination (HR). Extensive Mec1‐dependent phosphorylation of the STR complex, mostly on the Sgs1 helicase subunit, promotes an interaction between STR and the DNA repair scaffolding protein Dpb11. Fusion of Sgs1 to phosphopeptide‐binding domains of Dpb11 strongly impairs HR‐mediated repair, supporting a model whereby Mec1 signaling regulates STR upon hyper‐resection to influence recombination outcomes. Overall, the identification of a distinct Mec1 signaling response triggered by hyper‐resection highlights the multi‐faceted action of this kinase in the coordination of checkpoint signaling and HR‐mediated DNA repair.     

Mec1/ATR regulates the generation of single‐stranded DNA that attenuates Tel1/ATM signaling at DNA ends

Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinases are activated by DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs). Mec1/ATR recruitment to DSBs requires the formation of RPA‐coated single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA), which arises from 5′–3′ nucleolytic degradation (resection) of DNA ends. Here, we show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1 regulates resection of the DSB ends. The lack of Mec1 accelerates resection and reduces the loading to DSBs of the checkpoint protein Rad9, which is known to inhibit ssDNA generation. Extensive resection is instead inhibited by the Mec1‐ad mutant variant that increases the recruitment near the DSB of Rad9, which in turn blocks DSB resection by both Rad53‐dependent and Rad53‐independent mechanisms. The mec1‐ad resection defect leads to prolonged persistence at DSBs of the MRX complex that causes unscheduled Tel1 activation, which in turn impairs checkpoint switch off. Thus, Mec1 regulates the generation of ssDNA at DSBs, and this control is important to coordinate Mec1 and Tel1 signaling activities at these breaks.     

Molecular Dissection of the Checkpoint Kinase Hsl1p

Cell shape can influence cell behavior. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, bud emergence can influence cell cycle progression via the morphogenesis checkpoint. This surveillance pathway ensures that mitosis always follows bud formation by linking degradation of the mitosis-inhibitory kinase Swe1p (Wee1) to successful bud emergence. A crucial component of this pathway is the checkpoint kinase Hsl1p, which is activated upon bud emergence and promotes Swe1p degradation. We have dissected the large nonkinase domain of Hsl1p by using evolutionary conservation as a guide, identifying regions important for Hsl1p localization, function, and regulation. An autoinhibitory motif restrains Hsl1p activity when it is not properly localized to the mother-bud neck. Hsl1p lacking this motif is active as a kinase regardless of the assembly state of cytoskeletal septin filaments. However, the active but delocalized Hsl1p cannot promote Swe1p down-regulation, indicating that localization is required for Hsl1p function as well as Hsl1p activation. We also show that the septin-mediated Hsl1p regulation via the novel motif operates in parallel to a previously identified Hsl1p activation pathway involving phosphorylation of the Hsl1p kinase domain. We suggest that Hsl1p responds to alterations in septin organization, which themselves occur in response to the local geometry of the cell cortex.     

Non-Catalytic Function for ATR in the Checkpoint Response

The ATR family of checkpoint kinases is essential for an appropriate response to genomic insults in eukaryotes. Included in this family are Mei-41 in Drosophila, Mec1 in S. cerevisiae, Rad3 in S. pombe, and ATR in vertebrates. These large kinases phosphorylate and modify multiple cell cycle and checkpoint factors, leading to cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and induction of apoptosis. The catalytic domain of all ATR family members comprises only a fraction of the total protein. Here, we show that the non-catalytic portion of ATR has a conserved function in the checkpoint response. Expression of either wild type or various kinase defective forms of Xenopus ATR (XATR) in S. cerevisiae mec1 mutants suppresses the checkpoint defect and induces a DNA damage dependent mitotic cell cycle arrest. This suppression requires the presence of yeast Ddc2 and Rad9 but functions independently of Rad9 modification and Rad53 activation. Our results indicate that XATR is not functioning through the established mitotic checkpoint pathways. Instead, we find that the XATR suppression of the mec1 mutant checkpoint defect requires the spindle checkpoint factors Mad1 and Mad2, suggesting a role for XATR in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Finally, we show that a yeast strain expressing a truncated, kinase domain deleted form of mec1 from the endogenous locus is partially checkpoint proficient and induces a mitotic cell cycle arrest in a Mad2 dependent manner. Thus, the link between the non-catalytic region of the ATR kinase family and the spindle checkpoint pathway is conserved.     

Kinase Signaling in the Spindle Checkpoint

The spindle checkpoint is a cell cycle surveillance system that ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation. In mitosis, it elicits the “wait anaphase” signal to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome until all chromosomes achieve bipolar microtubule attachment and align at the metaphase plate. Because a single kinetochore unattached to microtubules activates the checkpoint, the wait anaphase signal is thought to be generated by this kinetochore and is then amplified and distributed throughout the cell to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. Several spindle checkpoint kinases participate in the generation and amplification of this signal. Recent studies have begun to reveal the activation mechanisms of these checkpoint kinases. Increasing evidence also indicates that the checkpoint kinases not only help to generate the wait anaphase signal but also actively correct kinetochore-microtubule attachment defects.     

Regulation of Sphingolipid Biosynthesis by the Morphogenesis Checkpoint Kinase Swe1

Sphingolipid (SL) biosynthesis is negatively regulated by the highly conserved endoplasmic reticulum-localized Orm family proteins. Defective SL synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae leads to increased phosphorylation and inhibition of Orm proteins by the kinase Ypk1. Here we present evidence that the yeast morphogenesis checkpoint kinase, Swe1, regulates SL biosynthesis independent of the Ypk1 pathway. Deletion of the Swe1 kinase renders mutant cells sensitive to serine palmitoyltransferase inhibition due to impaired sphingoid long-chain base synthesis. Based on these data and previous results, we suggest that Swe1 kinase perceives alterations in SL homeostasis, activates SL synthesis, and may thus represent the missing regulatory link that controls the SL rheostat during the cell cycle.     

Autoinhibition and Autoactivation of the DNA Replication Checkpoint Kinase Cds1

Cds1 is the ortholog of Chk2 and the major effector of the DNA replication checkpoint in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Previous studies have shown that Cds1 is activated by a two-stage mechanism. In the priming stage, the sensor kinase Rad3 and the mediator Mrc1 function to phosphorylate a threonine residue, Thr¹¹, in the SQ/TQ domain of Cds1. In the autoactivation stage, primed Cds1 molecules dimerize via intermolecular interactions between the phosphorylated Thr¹¹ in one Cds1 and the forkhead-associated domain of the other. Dimerization activates Cds1, probably by promoting autophosphorylation. To define the mechanisms for the autoactivation of primed Cds1 and the regulation of this process, we carried out genetic and biochemical studies to identify phosphorylatable residues required for checkpoint activation. Our data indicate that dimerization of Cds1 promotes trans-autophosphorylation of a number of residues in the catalytic domain, but phosphorylation of a highly conserved threonine residue (Thr³²⁸) in the activation loop is the only covalent modification required for kinase activation in vitro and in vivo. Autophosphorylation of Thr³²⁸ and kinase activation in unprimed, monomeric Cds1 are strongly inhibited by the C-terminal 27-amino acid tail of the enzyme. This autoinhibitory effect may play an important role in preventing spontaneous activation of the replication checkpoint during normal cell cycles. The two-stage activation pathway and the autoinhibition mechanism, which are probably shared by other members of the Chk2 family, provide sensitivity, specificity, and noise immunity, properties required for the replication checkpoint.DNA replication forks can be arrested or stalled by damage to DNA templates, depletion of deoxyribonucleotides, or inhibition of replisome enzymes (1). If undetected, arrested or stalled replication forks may undergo collapse, resulting in loss of genetic information, mutagenesis, or even cell death. To maintain the integrity of the genome, eukaryotes have evolved a surveillance mechanism called the “replication checkpoint” that can detect perturbations of DNA replication and elicit a number of cellular responses that serve to mitigate the effects of such perturbations. These cellular responses may include stabilization of replication forks, suppression of initiation of DNA replication, increased DNA repair activity, augmented production of deoxyribonucleotide precursors, and delay of mitosis. The replication checkpoint pathway is essential for cell survival under a variety of stressful conditions and has been conserved from yeast to humans (for reviews, see Refs. 1–3). Mutations in the pathway are also linked to cancer (4–6).The replication checkpoint is a complex signal transduction pathway that can be separated conceptually into three functional components. Sensors detect the perturbed DNA replication forks; mediators transduce the checkpoint signal, whereas effectors regulate the cell cycle and promote cell survival. Genetic studies, especially those in the yeasts, have identified most, if not all, of the essential factors of the pathway. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, six Rad proteins mediate the sensor function (for reviews, see Refs. 7 and 8). The protein kinase Rad3 (ATR in human cells) binds an essential co-factor Rad26 (ATRIP in human cells), and the complex associates with stalled replication forks. Rad9, Hus1, and Rad1 form the “9-1-1” ring structure similar to that of the replication processivity factor proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Rad17, in association with Rfc2-5, loads the 9-1-1 complex onto DNA at stalled forks. After detection of stalled forks by the sensor complexes, the mediator protein Mrc1 protein (Claspin in human cells) functions to facilitate the Rad3-dependent phosphorylation and activation of the effector protein kinase Cds1 (Chk2 in human cells) (9–11). Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggest that Mrc1 may be a component of the replisome (12, 13). A second mediator, Crb2 (BRCA1 in human cells) (14, 15), functions in response to DNA damage either within or outside of S phase. Crb2 facilitates the activation of a second effector kinase, Chk1.We have previously reported that in S. pombe, the effector kinase of the replication checkpoint pathway, Cds1, is activated by a two-stage mechanism (11). In the first or priming stage, the sensor kinase Rad3 phosphorylates two functionally redundant Cds1-docking repeats in the middle of the mediator Mrc1. The phosphorylated docking repeats on Mrc1 recruit Cds1 to the stalled replication fork by a phospho-dependent interaction with the forkhead-associated (FHA)3 domain of Cds1. Once recruited to the proximity of the assembled sensor complex, Cds1 is phosphorylated by Rad3 at Thr¹¹. In the second or autoactivation stage, primed Cds1 molecules dimerize by two identical intermolecular interactions between phosphorylated Thr¹¹ and the FHA domain. Dimerization promotes autophosphorylation and activation of Cds1. This two-stage activation mechanism is supported by genetic studies (9, 16–18) and is probably similar to the activation pathway for mammalian Chk2 (19–23). Although many steps in the pathway are now understood, the precise biochemical mechanism of autoactivation of primed Cds1 has not been well defined.Protein kinases can be activated by a variety of mechanisms. Although phosphorylation of the activation loop, usually by an upstream kinase of a signal transduction pathway, is the most common mechanism for kinase activation, some protein kinases can be activated by phosphorylation of residues outside the activation loop (for reviews, see Refs. 24 and 25). Other protein kinases can be activated without phosphorylation (e.g. by intermolecular interactions following dimerization) (26), by removal of an inhibitory element (27), or by binding to an activator (27, 28). Since the autoactivation of primed Cds1 requires dimerization, three possible activation mechanisms can be proposed. First, like many other protein kinases, Cds1 may be activated by phosphorylation of the activation loop (24). There are several known examples of kinase activation via trans-autophosphorylation of the activation loop. In these cases, the activation loop usually contains a consensus phosphorylation site of the kinase itself. This is not the case for Cds1 family kinases. A second possibility is that dimerization of Cds1 may allow intermolecular interactions that promote activation, as has been suggested for the epidermal growth factor receptor (26). Finally, activation of Cds1 may be a consequence of phosphorylation of residue(s) outside the activation loop. In the second and the third models, phosphorylation of the two essential threonine residues in the activation segment observed previously in mammalian Chk2 (22) and in the S. cerevisiae homologue Rad53 (29) would be a by-product, not a cause, of kinase activation.Several previous observations have provided evidence in support of the possibility that activation of Cds1 requires autophosphorylation. First, Cds1 is a phosphoprotein, and hydroxyurea (HU) treatment of cells induces further phosphorylation that is partially dependent on the kinase activity of Cds1 itself.⁴ In the case of mammalian Chk2, the ortholog of Cds1, sites of phosphorylation have been mapped to the activation segment residues, Thr³⁸³ and Thr³⁸⁷ (22, 30), as well as to residues Ser³⁷⁹ (31), Ser⁵¹⁶ (30, 32), and Ser⁴⁵⁶ (33), which lie outside of the activation segment. Phosphorylation has also been mapped by mass spectrometry to sites within and outside of the activation segment of Rad53 (29), the S. cerevisiae homologue of Cds1. Second, genetic studies have shown that residues Thr³²⁸ and Thr³³² in the activation segment of Cds1 (corresponding to Thr³⁸³ and Thr³⁸⁷ of Chk2 and Thr³⁵⁴ and Thr³⁵⁸ of Rad53) are essential for kinase activity (11, 34). Third, phosphatase treatment of “activated Cds1” purified from HU-treated cells abolishes kinase activity (11). Finally, activation of induced Cds1 dimers in vitro is dependent upon ATP (11).In this report, we describe experiments aimed at distinguishing among the three potential mechanisms for Cds1 activation. We show that there are only three phosphorylatable residues in the Cds1 kinase domain (Thr³²⁸, Thr³³², and Tyr³⁵²) that are essential for activation of the replication checkpoint in vivo and for enzyme activity in vitro. Of these three residues, Thr³²⁸ in the activation loop is a target of autophosphorylation, and its phosphorylation is the only covalent modification required for Cds1 activation. Autophosphorylation of Thr³²⁸ occurs in trans and only proceeds at an appreciable rate when the enzyme is at high local concentration. Presumably, one molecule in a Cds1 dimer transiently assumes an active conformation and phosphorylates the Thr³²⁸ in the activation loop of the other molecule. The activated molecule can then rapidly phosphorylate its dimeric partner. The second essential residue, Thr³³², which is also in the activation loop, is not phosphorylated and is likely required, directly or indirectly, for catalysis. The third essential residue Tyr³⁵² can be autophosphorylated in vitro with the Cds1 purified from S. pombe, and its phosphorylation is strongly stimulated by dimerization. However, Tyr³⁵² phosphorylation is not readily observed in vivo and is not required for Cds1 activation. Our data rule out the other two possible mechanisms for Cds1 activation: phosphorylation of sites outside of the activation segment and phosphorylation-independent conformational changes induced by dimerization. We also report that the C terminus of Cds1 is a cis-regulatory element that can dramatically suppress Cds1 autoactivation in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, our data explain how the replication checkpoint can be sensitive and specific and also possess a high threshold for spontaneous activation.     

Bub1p Kinase Activates the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spindle Assembly Checkpoint

Saccharomyces cerevisiae BUB1 encodes a protein kinase required for spindle assembly checkpoint function. In the presence of spindle damage, BUB1 is required to prevent cell cycle progression into anaphase. We have identified a dominantly acting BUB1 allele that appears to activate the spindle assembly checkpoint pathway in cells with undamaged spindles. High-level expression of BUB1-5 did not cause detectable spindle damage, yet it delayed yeast cells in mitosis at a stage following bipolar spindle assembly but prior to anaphase spindle elongation. Delayed cells possessed a G₂ DNA content and elevated Clb2p mitotic cyclin levels. Unlike cells delayed in mitosis by spindle damage or MPS1 kinase overexpression, hyperphosphorylated forms of the Mad1p checkpoint protein did not accumulate. Similar to cells overexpressing MPS1, the BUB1-5 delay was dependent upon the functions of the other checkpoint genes, including BUB2 and BUB3 and MAD1, MAD2, and MAD3. We found that the mitotic delay caused by BUB1-5 or MPS1 overexpression was interdependent upon the function of the other. This suggests that the Bub1p and Mps1p kinases act together at an early step in generating the spindle damage signal.     

ATR homolog Mec1 controls association of DNA polymerase zeta-Rev1 complex with regions near a double-strand break

DNA polymerase zeta (Polzeta) and Rev1 contribute to the bypassing of DNA lesions, termed translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). Polzeta consists of two subunits, one encoded by REV3 (the catalytic subunit) and the other encoded by REV7. Rev1 acts as a deoxycytidyl transferase, inserting dCMP opposite lesions. Polzeta and Rev1 have been shown to operate in the same TLS pathway in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we show that budding yeast Polzeta and Rev1 form a complex and associate together with double-strand breaks (DSBs). As a component of the Polzeta-Rev1 complex, Rev1 plays a noncatalytic role in the association with DSBs. In budding yeast, the ATR-homolog Mec1 plays a central role in the DNA-damage checkpoint response. We further show that Mec1-dependent phosphorylation promotes the Polzeta-Rev1 association with DSBs. Rev1 association with DSBs requires neither the function of the Rad24 checkpoint-clamp loader nor the Rad6-Rad18-mediated ubiquitination of PCNA. Our results reveal a novel role of Mec1 in the localization of the Polzeta-Rev1 complex to DNA lesions and highlight a linkage of TLS polymerases to the checkpoint response.