Peripheral mechanisms take central stage in microtubule dynamics: Commentary on "Signaling function of α-catenin in microtubule regulation" by Shtutman et al.

Although the centrosome is traditionally viewed as cell’s principle microtubule organizing center (MTOC), regulation of microtubule dynamics at the cell cortex plays an equally important role in the formation of the steady-state microtubule network. Several recent studies, including one published in this issue, reveal that complex signaling mechanisms associated with adherence junctions influence both microtubule nucleation at the centrosome, and the stability of non-centrosomal microtubules.

In the mid 1980s Marc Kirschner and Timothy Mitchison proposed an elegant “search-and-capture” hypothesis that seemed to explain how cells manage to convert a simple radial array of microtubules produced by the centrosome into the complex and precisely regulated asymmetric network found in a typical polarized cell. The key to this mechanism was the selective stabilization of inherently dynamic microtubule plus ends at the certain parts of cell cortex.4 Subsequently, it was shown that microtubule plus ends can in fact be captured and stabilized at diverse cortical loci including focal adhesions and adherence junctions. These observations provided direct support to the search-and-capture hypothesis. However, in recent years it became clear that role of cell cortex in the regulation of microtubule dynamics goes beyond simple stabilization of the plus ends. For example, there is evidence that integrin β1 is involved in the regulation of microtubule nucleation at the centrosome.6 Further, in polarized epithelia, cell cortex serves as the dominant MTOC, effectively replacing the centrosome.5 Thus, cell-cortex mechanisms affect microtubule dynamics both at their plus- and minus ends. The challenge now is to identify molecular pathways underlying this regulation.

A study in this issue of Cell Cycle (Shtutman et al.) suggests that α-catenin, a major component of adherence junctions is responsible for promoting microtubule nucleation and/or stability in a centrosome-independent fashion. Shtutman and coworkers used centrosome-free cytoplasts. The number of microtubules in these cytoplasts is low in the absence of cell-cell contacts but increases to near-normal levels in confluent cultures3 or upon overexpression of cadherins1 suggesting that adherence junctions somehow regulate microtubule dynamics. Shtutman and coworkers now demonstrate a similar increase in microtubule density can be induced by overexpression of a membrane-targeted α catenin. This is an exciting finding because α-catenin is also directly involved in the regulation of actin dynamics2 and thus this molecule emerges as a central player in the global regulation of the cytoskeleton in response to extracellular interactions. Interestingly, expression of non-membrane-targeted α-catenin only mildly increased the density of microtubule network in centrosome-free cytoplasts suggesting that α-catenin needs to be engaged in an activation event at the cell cortex, perhaps within the adherence junction.

Although formation of cell-cell junctions clearly increases the density of microtubule network, microtubule nucleation appears to occur throughout the cytoplasm and not preferentially at adherence junctions in these cells.1 Thus, local interactions at adherence junctions ultimately result in the propagation of a certain factor(s) that influences global microtubule dynamics. The exact nature of this factor or even the general layout of the pathway that alters microtubule dynamics in response to cortical interactions remain unknown. However, the demonstration that α-catenin is one of the molecular players required for this pathway is an important towards the understanding the link between extracellular interactions and microtubule dynamics.

Further Reading

Chausovsky A, Bershadsky AD, Borisy GG. Cadherin-mediated regulation of microtubule dynamics. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2:797- 804. Gates J, Peifer M. Can 1000 reviews be wrong? Actin, alpha-Catenin, and adherens junctions. Cell 2005; 123:769-72. Karsenti E, Kobayashi S, Mitchison T, Kirschner M. Role of the centrosome in organizing the interphase microtubule array: properties of cytoplasts containing or lacking centrosomes. J Cell Biol 1984; 98:1763-76. Kirschner M, Mitchison T. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell 1986; 45:329-42. Reilein A, Yamada S, Nelson WJ. Self-organization of an acentrosomal microtubule network at the basal cortex of polarized epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 2005; 171:845-55. Reverte CG, Benware A, Jones CW, LaFlamme SE. Perturbing integrin function inhibits microtubule growth from centrosomes, spindle assembly, and cytokinesis. J Cell Biol 2006; 174:491-7.     

β-Cells retain a pool of insulin-containing secretory vesicles regulated by adherens junctions and the cadherin-binding protein p120 catenin

The β-cells of the islets of Langerhans are the sole producers of insulin in the human body. In response to rising glucose levels, insulin-containing vesicles inside β-cells fuse with the plasma membrane and release their cargo. However, the mechanisms regulating this process are only partly understood. Previous evidence indicated reductions in α-catenin elevate insulin release, while reductions in β-catenin decrease insulin release. α- and β-catenin contribute to cellular regulation in a range of ways but one is as members of the adherens junction complex. Therefore, we investigated the effects of adherens junctions on insulin release. We show in INS-1E β-cells knockdown of either E- or N-cadherin had only small effects on insulin secretion, but simultaneous knockdown of both cadherins resulted in a significant increase in basal insulin release to the same level as glucose-stimulated release. This double knockdown also significantly attenuated levels of p120 catenin, a cadherin-binding partner involved in regulating cadherin turnover. Conversely, reducing p120 catenin levels with siRNA destabilized both E- and N-cadherin, and this was also associated with an increase in levels of insulin secreted from INS-1E cells. Furthermore, there were also changes in these cells consistent with higher insulin release, namely reductions in levels of F-actin and increased intracellular free Ca²⁺ levels in response to KCl-induced membrane depolarization. Taken together, these data provide evidence that adherens junctions play important roles in retaining a pool of insulin secretory vesicles within the cell and establish a role for p120 catenin in regulating this process.     

Distribution of adherens junction mediated by VE-cadherin complex in rat spleen sinus endothelial cells

The splenic sinus endothelium regulates the passage of blood cells through the splenic cord. The goal of the present study was to assess the localization of vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin, β-catenin, and p120-catenin in the sinus endothelial cells of rat spleen and to characterize the presence and distribution of adherens junction formation mediated by the cadherin-catenin complex. Immunofluorescent microscopy of tissue cryosections demonstrated that VE-cadherin, β-catenin, and p120-catenin were localized in the junctional regions of adjacent endothelial cells. Double-staining immunofluorescent microscopy for VE-cadherin and β-catenin revealed colocalization at junctional regions. Transmission electron microscopy of thin sections of sinus endothelial cells treated with Triton X-100 clearly showed adherens junctions within the plasma membrane. Adherens junctions were located at various levels in the lateral membranes of adjacent endothelial cells regardless of the presence or absence of underlying ring fibers. Immunogold electron microscopy revealed VE-cadherin, β-catenin, and p120-catenin in the juxtaposed junctional membranes of adjacent sinus endothelial cells. Double-staining immunogold microscopy for VE-cadherin and β-catenin and for VE-cadherin and p120-catenin demonstrated colocalization to the junctional membranes of adjacent endothelial cells. Immunolabeling was evident at various levels in the lateral junctional membranes and was intermittently observed in the sinus endothelium. These data suggest that adherens junctions, whose formation appears to be mediated by VE-cadherin-catenin complexes, probably regulate the passage of blood cells through the spleen. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), Japan     

p120ctn and P-Cadherin but Not E-Cadherin Regulate Cell Motility and Invasion of DU145 Prostate Cancer Cells

Background

Adherens junctions consist of transmembrane cadherins, which interact intracellularly with p120ctn, ß-catenin and α-catenin. p120ctn is known to regulate cell-cell adhesion by increasing cadherin stability, but the effects of other adherens junction components on cell-cell adhesion have not been compared with that of p120ctn.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We show that depletion of p120ctn by small interfering RNA (siRNA) in DU145 prostate cancer and MCF10A breast epithelial cells reduces the expression levels of the adherens junction proteins, E-cadherin, P-cadherin, ß-catenin and α-catenin, and induces loss of cell-cell adhesion. p120ctn-depleted cells also have increased migration speed and invasion, which correlates with increased Rap1 but not Rac1 or RhoA activity. Downregulation of P-cadherin, β-catenin and α-catenin but not E-cadherin induces a loss of cell-cell adhesion, increased migration and enhanced invasion similar to p120ctn depletion. However, only p120ctn depletion leads to a decrease in the levels of other adherens junction proteins.

Conclusions/Significance

Our data indicate that P-cadherin but not E-cadherin is important for maintaining adherens junctions in DU145 and MCF10A cells, and that depletion of any of the cadherin-associated proteins, p120ctn, ß-catenin or α-catenin, is sufficient to disrupt adherens junctions in DU145 cells and increase migration and cancer cell invasion.     

Novel membrane protein shrew-1 targets to cadherin-mediated junctions in polarized epithelial cells

While searching for potential candidate molecules relevant for the pathogenesis of endometriosis, we discovered a 2910-base pair cDNA encoding a novel putative 411-amino acid integral membrane protein that we called shrew-1. The putative open-reading frame was confirmed with antibodies against shrew-1 peptides that labeled a protein of ~48 kDa in extracts of shrew-1 mRNA-positive tissue and also detected ectopically expressed shrew-1. Expression of epitope-tagged shrew-1 in epithelial cells and analysis by surface biotinylation and immunoblots demonstrated that shrew-1 is indeed a transmembrane protein. Shrew-1 is able to target to E-cadherin-mediated adherens junctions and interact with the E-cadherin–catenin complex in polarized MCF7 and Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, but not with the N-cadherin–catenin complex in nonpolarized epithelial cells. Direct interaction of shrew-1 with β-catenin in in vitro pull-down assay suggests that β-catenin might be one of the proteins that targets and/or retains shrew-1 in the adherens junctions. Interestingly, shrew-1 was partially translocated in response to scatter factor (ligand of receptor tyrosine kinase c-met) from the plasma membrane to the cytoplasm where it still colocalized with endogenous E-cadherin. In summary, we introduce shrew-1 as a novel component of adherens junctions, interacting with E-cadherin–β-catenin complexes in polarized epithelial cells.     

p120-catenin and β-catenin differentially regulate cadherin adhesive function

Vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin, the major adherens junction adhesion molecule in endothelial cells, interacts with p120-catenin and β-catenin through its cytoplasmic tail. However, the specific functional contributions of the catenins to the establishment of strong adhesion are not fully understood. Here we use bioengineering approaches to identify the roles of cadherin–catenin interactions in promoting strong cellular adhesion and the ability of the cells to spread on an adhesive surface. Our results demonstrate that the domain of VE-cadherin that binds to β-catenin is required for the establishment of strong steady-state adhesion strength. Surprisingly, p120 binding to the cadherin tail had no effect on the strength of adhesion when the available adhesive area was limited. Instead, the binding of VE-cadherin to p120 regulates adhesive contact area in a Rac1-dependent manner. These findings reveal that p120 and β-catenin have distinct but complementary roles in strengthening cadherin-mediated adhesion.     

Differential regulation of junctional complex assembly in renal epithelial cell lines

Several signaling pathways that regulate tight junction and adherens junction assembly are being characterized. Calpeptin activates stress fiber assembly in fibroblasts by inhibiting SH2-containing phosphatase-2 (SHP-2), thereby activating Rho-GTPase signaling. Here, we have examined the effects of calpeptin on stress fiber and junctional complex assembly in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) and LLC-PK epithelial cells. Calpeptin induced disassembly of stress fibers and inhibition of Rho GTPase activity in MDCK cells. Interestingly, calpeptin augmented stress fiber formation in LLC-PK epithelial cells. Calpeptin treatment of MDCK cells resulted in a displacement of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and occludin from cell-cell junctions and a loss of phosphotyrosine on ZO-1 and ZO-2, without any detectable effect on tight junction permeability. Surprisingly, calpeptin increased paracellular permeability in LLC-PK cells even though it did not affect tight junction assembly. Calpeptin also modulated adherens junction assembly in MDCK cells but not in LLC-PK cells. Calpeptin treatment of MDCK cells induced redistribution of E-cadherin and -catenin from intercellular junctions and reduced the association of p120ctn with the E-cadherin/catenin complex. Together, our studies demonstrate that calpeptin differentially regulates stress fiber and junctional complex assembly in MDCK and LLC-PK epithelial cells, indicating that these pathways may be regulated in a cell line-specific manner. calpeptin; tight junctions; adherens junctions; Rho; cadherin; p120ctn     

Protein kinase C-Fyn kinase cascade mediates the oleic acid-induced disassembly of neonatal rat cardiomyocyte adherens junctions

Oleic acid (OA) affects assembly of gap junctions in neonatal cardiomyocytes. Adherens junction (AJ) regulates the stability of gap junction integrity; however, the effect of OA on AJ remains largely unexplored. The distribution of N-cadherin and catenins at cell–cell junction was decreased by OA. OA induced activation of protein kinase C(PKC)-α and -? and Src family kinase, and all three kinases were involved in the oleic acid-induced disassembly of the adherens junction, since it was blocked by pretreatment with Gö6976 (a PKCα inhibitor), ?V1–2 (a PKC? inhibitor), or PP2 (a Src family kinase inhibitor). Src family kinase appeared to be the downstream of PKC-α and -?, as blockade of either PKC-α or -? activity prevented the OA-induced activation of Src family kinase. Immunoprecipitation analyses showed that OA activated Fyn and Fer. OA promoted the association of p120 catenin/β-catenin with Fyn and Fer and caused increased tyrosine phosphorylation of p120 catenin and β-catenin, resulting in decreased binding of the former to N-cadherin and of the latter to α-catenin. Pretreatment with PP2 abrogated this OA-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of p120 catenin and β-catenin and restored the association of N-cadherin with p120 catenin and that of β-catenin with α-catenin. In conclusion, these results show that OA activates the PKC-Fyn signaling pathway, leading to the disassembly of the AJ. Therefore, inhibitors of PKC-α/-? and Src family kinase are potential candidates as cardioprotection agents against OA-induced heart injury during ischemia-reperfusion.     

The catenin, p120ctn, is a common membrane-associated protein in various epithelial and non-epithelial cells and tissues

The cadherin-binding catenin p120ctn was originally identified as an Src-tyrosine kinase substrate. More recently, p120ctn has been shown in some cell types to be associated with catenin/cadherin complexes of adherens junctions. To address the question whether p120ctn is restricted to certain cell types or whether it is a general cellular component we investigated tissue distribution of p120ctn by immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting in the rat. We found p120ctn to be widely distributed in several tissues where it is mainly restricted to the plasma membrane. In various epithelia p120ctn was found in association with different adherens junctions such as the zonula adherens and puncta adherentia. In addition, p120ctn was localized along infoldings of the basal cell membrane, most prominently in renal proximal and distal tubules. pl20ctn was not restricted to epithelia. It was also found at intercalated discs of cardiomyocytes. In the nervous system, immunostaining was particularly prominent in areas rich in synapses suggesting that pl20ctn is a component of synaptic adherens junctions as well. By immunoblotting, four different isoforms of pl20ctn could be detected displaying similar electrophoretic mobilities as the isoforms 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B reported from mice. Whereas all epithelia assayed contained at least two isoforms, testis, heart, brain, and retina contained a single 110-kDa band that corresponds to isoform 1B in mice.     

Ankyrin-G Inhibits Endocytosis of Cadherin Dimers

Dynamic regulation of endothelial cell adhesion is central to vascular development and maintenance. Furthermore, altered endothelial adhesion is implicated in numerous diseases. Therefore, normal vascular patterning and maintenance require tight regulation of endothelial cell adhesion dynamics. However, the mechanisms that control junctional plasticity are not fully understood. Vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin) is an adhesive protein found in adherens junctions of endothelial cells. VE-cadherin mediates adhesion through trans interactions formed by its extracellular domain. Trans binding is followed by cis interactions that laterally cluster the cadherin in junctions. VE-cadherin is linked to the actin cytoskeleton through cytoplasmic interactions with β- and α-catenin, which serve to increase adhesive strength. Furthermore, p120-catenin binds to the cytoplasmic tail of cadherin and stabilizes it at the plasma membrane. Here we report that induced cis dimerization of VE-cadherin inhibits endocytosis independent of both p120 binding and trans interactions. However, we find that ankyrin-G, a protein that links membrane proteins to the spectrin-actin cytoskeleton, associates with VE-cadherin and inhibits its endocytosis. Ankyrin-G inhibits VE-cadherin endocytosis independent of p120 binding. We propose a model in which ankyrin-G associates with and inhibits the endocytosis of VE-cadherin cis dimers. Our findings support a novel mechanism for regulation of VE-cadherin endocytosis through ankyrin association with cadherin engaged in lateral interactions.     

The Caenorhabditis elegans p120 catenin homologue,JAC-1, modulates cadherin-catenin function during epidermal morphogenesis

The cadherin-catenin complex is essential for tissue morphogenesis during animal development. In cultured mammalian cells, p120 catenin (p120ctn) is an important regulator of cadherin-catenin complex function. However, information on the role of p120ctn family members in cadherin-dependent events in vivo is limited. We have examined the role of the single Caenorhabditis elegans p120ctn homologue JAC-1 (juxtamembrane domain [JMD]-associated catenin) during epidermal morphogenesis. Similar to other p120ctn family members, JAC-1 binds the JMD of the classical cadherin HMR-1, and GFP-tagged JAC-1 localizes to adherens junctions in an HMR-1-dependent manner. Surprisingly, depleting JAC-1 expression using RNA interference (RNAi) does not result in any obvious defects in embryonic or postembryonic development. However, jac-1(RNAi) does increase the severity and penetrance of morphogenetic defects caused by a hypomorphic mutation in the hmp-1/alpha-catenin gene. In these hmp-1 mutants, jac-1 depletion causes failure of the embryo to elongate into a worm-like shape, a process that involves contraction of the epidermis. Associated with failed elongation is the detachment of actin bundles from epidermal adherens junctions and failure to maintain cadherin in adherens junctions. These results suggest that JAC-1 acts as a positive modulator of cadherin function in C. elegans.     

Cross-Talk between Adherens Junctions and Desmosomes Depends on Plakoglobin

Squamous epithelial cells have both adherens junctions and desmosomes. The ability of these cells to organize the desmosomal proteins into a functional structure depends upon their ability first to organize an adherens junction. Since the adherens junction and the desmosome are separate structures with different molecular make up, it is not immediately obvious why formation of an adherens junction is a prerequisite for the formation of a desmosome. The adherens junction is composed of a transmembrane classical cadherin (E-cadherin and/or P-cadherin in squamous epithelial cells) linked to either β-catenin or plakoglobin, which is linked to α-catenin, which is linked to the actin cytoskeleton. The desmosome is composed of transmembrane proteins of the broad cadherin family (desmogleins and desmocollins) that are linked to the intermediate filament cytoskeleton, presumably through plakoglobin and desmoplakin. To begin to study the role of adherens junctions in the assembly of desmosomes, we produced an epithelial cell line that does not express classical cadherins and hence is unable to organize desmosomes, even though it retains the requisite desmosomal components. Transfection of E-cadherin and/or P-cadherin into this cell line did not restore the ability to organize desmosomes; however, overexpression of plakoglobin, along with E-cadherin, did permit desmosome organization. These data suggest that plakoglobin, which is the only known common component to both adherens junctions and desmosomes, must be linked to E-cadherin in the adherens junction before the cell can begin to assemble desmosomal components at regions of cell–cell contact. Although adherens junctions can form in the absence of plakoglobin, making use only of β-catenin, such junctions cannot support the formation of desmosomes. Thus, we speculate that plakoglobin plays a signaling role in desmosome organization.Squamous epithelial cells typically contain two prominent types of cell–cell junctions: the adherens junction and the desmosome. The adherens junction is an intercellular adhesion complex that is composed of a transmembrane protein (a classical cadherin) and numerous cytoplasmic proteins (α-catenin, β-catenin and plakoglobin, vinculin and α-actinin; for reviews see Takeichi, 1990; Geiger and Ayalon, 1992). The cadherins are directly responsible for adhesive interactions via a Ca²⁺-dependent, homotypic mechanism, i.e., in the presence of sufficient Ca²⁺, cadherin on one cell binds to an identical molecule on an adjacent cell. The desmosome, also an intercellular adhesion complex, is composed of at least two different transmembrane proteins (desmoglein and desmocollin) as well as several cytoplasmic proteins, including desmoplakins and plakoglobin (Koch and Franke, 1994). The transmembrane components of the desmosome are members of the broadly defined cadherin family and also require Ca²⁺ for adhesive activity. However, decisive experimental evidence for homophilic or heterophilic interactions between desmosomal cadherins via their extracellular domains has not yet been presented (Koch and Franke, 1994; Kowalczyk et al., 1996). While members of the cadherin family constitute the transmembrane portion of both adherens junctions and desmosomes, the different classes of cadherins are linked to different cytoskeletal elements by the cytoplasmic components of each junction. Specifically, the classical cadherins are linked to actin filaments and the desmosomal cadherins to intermediate filaments.The organization of the proteins within the adherens junction is well understood (for reviews see Kemler, 1993; Cowin, 1994; Wheelock et al., 1996). Specifically, the intracellular domain of cadherin interacts directly with either plakoglobin or β-catenin, which in turns binds to α-catenin (Jou et al., 1995; Sacco et al., 1995). α-Catenin interacts with α-actinin and actin filaments, thereby linking the cadherin/ catenin complex to the cytoskeleton (Knudsen et al., 1995; Rimm et al., 1995). Cadherin/catenin complexes include either plakoglobin or β-catenin but not both (Näthke et al., 1994). The importance of the classical cadherins to the formation of adherens junctions and desmosomes has been demonstrated. Keratinocytes maintained in medium with low Ca²⁺ (i.e., 30 μM) grow as a monolayer and do not exhibit adherens junctions or desmosomes; however, elevation of Ca²⁺ concentration induces the rapid formation of adherens junctions followed by the formation of desmosomes (Hennings et al., 1980; Tsao et al., 1982; Boyce and Ham, 1983; Hennings and Holbrook, 1983; O''Keefe et al., 1987; Wheelock and Jensen, 1992; Hodivala and Watt, 1994; Lewis et al., 1994). Simultaneous blocking with functionperturbing antibodies against the two classical cadherins (E- and P-cadherin) found in keratinocytes inhibits not only Ca²⁺-induced adherens junction formation but also severely limits desmosome formation (Lewis et al., 1994; Jensen et al., 1996). Consistent with these findings, expression of a dominant-negative cadherin by keratinocytes results in decreased E-cadherin expression and delayed assembly of desmosomes (Fujimori and Takeicki, 1993; Amagai, et al., 1995). These data suggest some form of cross-talk between the proteins of the adherens junction and those of the desmosome. One candidate protein that might mediate such cross-talk is plakoglobin, since it is the only known common component of both junctions.Plakoglobin is found to be associated with the cytoplasmic domains of both the classical cadherins and the desmosomal cadherins. Despite the high degree of identity between plakoglobin and β-catenin (65% at the amino acid level; Fouquet et al., 1992), β-catenin only associates with the classical cadherins and not with the desmosomal cadherins. In the adherens junction, plakoglobin and β-catenin have at least one common function, i.e., the linking of cadherin to α-catenin and thus to actin. However, there is emerging evidence that other functions of these two proteins are not identical. For example, in a study by Navarro et al. (1993), E-cadherin transfected into a spindle cell carcinoma was shown to associate with α- and β-catenin, but not with the low levels of endogenous plakoglobin. The transfected cells did not revert to a more epithelial morphology in spite of the presence of functional E-cadherin, and the authors suggested that the lack of plakoglobin may have prevented such morphological reversion.In the present study, we have tested the hypothesis that plakoglobin, through its interaction with E- or P-cadherin, serves as a regulatory molecule for desmosome organization. Even though plakoglobin is not an essential structural component of the adherens junction (Sacco et al., 1995), our data indicate that plakoglobin can function as a regulator of desmosome formation only when it is associated with a classical cadherin. Thus, we propose that plakoglobin has at least two functions: (a) as a structural component of the adherens junction and the desmosome and (b) as a signaling molecule that regulates communication between the adherens junction and the desmosome.     

Special delivery: dynamic targeting via cortical capture of microtubules

Gap junction formation depends on the proper transport of connexin hemichannels to sites of cell-cell contact. Recently in Cell, Shaw et al. implicate microtubule tip tracking proteins in the trafficking of connexin43 to adherens junctions (Shaw et al., 2007). This finding suggests a mechanism for targeted delivery of membrane proteins by microtubule capture at the cortex.     

A membrane fusion protein αSNAP is a novel regulator of epithelial apical junctions

Tight junctions (TJs) and adherens junctions (AJs) are key determinants of the structure and permeability of epithelial barriers. Although exocytic delivery to the cell surface is crucial for junctional assembly, little is known about the mechanisms controlling TJ and AJ exocytosis. This study was aimed at investigating whether a key mediator of exocytosis, soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein alpha (αSNAP), regulates epithelial junctions. αSNAP was enriched at apical junctions in SK-CO15 and T84 colonic epithelial cells and in normal human intestinal mucosa. siRNA-mediated knockdown of αSNAP inhibited AJ/TJ assembly and establishment of the paracellular barrier in SK-CO15 cells, which was accompanied by a significant down-regulation of p120-catenin and E-cadherin expression. A selective depletion of p120 catenin effectively disrupted AJ and TJ structure and compromised the epithelial barrier. However, overexpression of p120 catenin did not rescue the defects of junctional structure and permeability caused by αSNAP knockdown thereby suggesting the involvement of additional mechanisms. Such mechanisms did not depend on NSF functions or induction of cell death, but were associated with disruption of the Golgi complex and down-regulation of a Golgi-associated guanidine nucleotide exchange factor, GBF1. These findings suggest novel roles for αSNAP in promoting the formation of epithelial AJs and TJs by controlling Golgi-dependent expression and trafficking of junctional proteins.     

Guilt by association: What p120-catenin has to hide

Members of the p120-catenin family associate with cadherins and regulate their stability at the plasma membrane. How p120-catenin limits cadherin endocytosis has long remained a mystery. In this issue, Nanes et al. (2012. J. Cell Biol. doi:10.1083/jcb.201205029) identify a conserved acidic motif within cadherins that acts as a physical platform for p120-catenin binding. However, in the absence of p120-catenin, the motif acts as an endocytic signal. These results provide new insight into p120-catenin’s role as guardian of intercellular junction dynamics.Adhesion receptors of the classical cadherin family have a major role in establishing tissue organization and maintaining tissue homeostasis (Gumbiner, 1996). Classical cadherins are transmembrane glycoproteins that use their extracellular domains to establish calcium-dependent trans homophilic interactions with cadherins in neighboring cells. To enhance adhesive strength, cadherin ectodomains oligomerize through lateral (cis) interactions, whereas their cytoplasmic domains anchor to the actomyosin cytoskeleton. The cytoplasmic domain of cadherins is highly conserved and binds to proteins called catenins. p120-catenin (p120) associates with the transmembrane adjacent domain (juxtamembrane; JMD) of the cadherin cytoplasmic tail, whereas β-catenin interacts with the more distal portion of cadherin’s cytoplasmic domain. β-Catenin in turn, binds α-catenin, which, through multiple interactions, both indirect and direct, can associate with the actin cytoskeleton (Perez-Moreno and Fuchs, 2006).Cellular rearrangements are orchestrated by dynamic assembly/disassembly of cadherin complexes. The process is fueled by endocytosis of cadherin complexes (Le et al., 1999; de Beco et al., 2009). Endocytosis can be stimulated by proteins that associate with cadherin–catenin complexes, including proteases that shed the cadherin ectodomains, and the ubiquitin ligase Hakai (Fujita et al., 2002). Cadherin internalization can be regulated by different pathways depending on the cellular context, involving clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent mechanisms. These endocytic processes must be carefully regulated, as an untimely destabilization of cadherin-mediated adhesion can lead to alterations in tissue architecture and growth, features of several diseases, including cancers (Mosesson et al., 2008).In the past decade, p120 catenins (p120, ARVCF, δ-catenin, and p0071) have emerged as critical regulators of cadherin-mediated adhesion (Reynolds, 2007). p120, the founding family member, is a component of cadherin complexes (Reynolds et al., 1994), and its association with the cadherin JMD is important for retaining cadherins at the membrane (Ireton et al., 2002). Moreover, p120 loss causes rapid internalization of cadherins, followed by proteasomal and/or lysosomal-mediated degradation (Davis et al., 2003; Xiao et al., 2003a,b, 2005; Miyashita and Ozawa, 2007).Although these studies expose p120 as a master regulator of cadherin levels at the membrane, exactly how p120 governs cadherin endocytosis rates has remained unclear. Based upon experiments in which endocytic machinery components (clathrin, dynamin, and AP2) have been impaired (Chiasson et al., 2009) or cadherin endocytic motifs have been mutated (Hong et al., 2010; Troyanovsky et al., 2007), researchers have posited that p120 binding to cadherins may in some way prevent junctional complex endocytosis. In this issue, Nanes et al. add new molecular insights into the mechanism. The authors show that the VE-cadherin JMD functions as a bimodal platform for either p120 binding or endocytic signaling. Moreover, they identify a key conserved amino acid residue within the JMD, which, when mutated, blocks endocytosis without the need for p120.Recently, the cocrystallization of p120 bound to E-cadherin’s JMD has yielded insights into the essential residues of this binding interface (Ishiyama et al., 2010). Previous studies had attributed the core function of p120-cadherin to its ability to bind and mask a dileucine endocytic motif present in the JMD (Miyashita and Ozawa, 2007; Hong et al., 2010). The crystal structure showed that interactions between p120 and the JMD domain might be sufficient to sterically prevent accessibility of the dileucine cadherin endocytic motif to endocytic adaptors such as the AP2-clathrin adaptor, thereby placing this motif at the crux of the bimodal switch controlling the mutually exclusive binding of either p120 or the endocytic machinery.The affinity of p120 and AP2 for the JMD dileucine motif is similar, pointing toward the existence of a balanced regulation of cadherin endocytic rates and cadherin retention at the membrane. However, evaluating this balance in cellular contexts has not been possible because of the inability to uncouple p120 binding to the JMD and endocytosis. Nanes et al. (2012) have now overcome this hurdle. They first used a simulated model of the p120–E-cadherin crystal structure, which highlighted a conserved p120-binding region that is present in the JMD of both VE- and E-cadherin. However, the VE-cadherin JMD lacked endocytic dileucine and tyrosine residues present in E-cadherin, which are involved in clathrin internalization and Hakai-dependent ubiquitination, respectively.Because both types of adherens junctions undergo dynamic endocytic-based remodeling, the authors astutely realized that they might be able to exploit VE- and E-cadherin differences to unearth novel endocytic signals within the sequence that might be conserved among cadherins. To this end, the author first used mutant VE-cadherin chimeric proteins, consisting of the cytoplasmic domain of VE-cadherin fused to the extracellular domain of the IL-2 receptor, and internalization assays. They discovered that the core p120-binding region on its own was endocytosed, in a fashion similar to the full VE-cadherin cytoplasmic tail. This occurred in a clathrin-dependent manner, as previously observed in Kowalzcyk’s laboratory (Chiasson et al., 2009). Point mutagenesis identified some mutants no longer able to bind p120, which is consistent with previous findings (Thoreson et al., 2000). But the authors made an interesting finding: mutations in a conserved acidic motif (DEE) within the p120-core binding region of the JMD displayed loss of p120 binding and also blocked cadherin internalization (Fig. 1). Moreover, DEE mutant VE-cadherins localized stably at the membrane even in the absence of p120, although with an increased diffusion within the membrane. This increase in mobility suggests a reduction in cadherin lateral clustering, a process modulated by the binding of p120 to the JMD (Yap et al., 1998). Interestingly, in crystal structures, the E-cadherin JMD binding to p120 induced oligomerization of the complex (Ishiyama et al., 2010).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Model of VE-cadherin stabilization at the cell membrane. (A) VE-cadherin binds to p120 and β-catenin. p120 associates with the juxtamembrane (JMD) domain of the cadherin cytoplasmic tail, whereas β-catenin binds to the more distal portion (catenin binding domain, CBD). Cadherin internalization is triggered by p120 dissociation, exposing a conserved endocytic factor recognition motif (DEE; 646–648) within the JMD. (B) When this motif is mutated in VE-cadherin, adherens junctions are resistant to endocytosis independent of p120 binding.These new tools now allow uncoupling of p120 binding from cadherin endocytosis, which will be instrumental in unraveling new p120 cadherin roles in cell adhesion. The VE-cadherin mutant that fails to bind to p-120 still coimmunoprecipitates with β-catenin. These findings are intriguing, given that overexpression of p120 can rescue the otherwise poor adhesive properties of cadherins mutant for β-catenin binding (Ohkubo and Ozawa, 1999). In addition, interactions between p120 and α-catenin at adherens junctions seem to contribute in preventing cadherin endocytosis (Troyanovsky et al., 2011). Given these collective results, it will be interesting in the future to measure the binding affinities of endocytosis-uncoupled VE-cadherin mutants for its binding partners.Overall, these data provide strong evidence that the JMD landing pad provides the nuts and bolts of the decision of whether an adherens junction remains at the cell surface or whether it is internalized. But who makes the decision? Recent results from Gumbiner’s group provide a possible clue. They show that cadherin activation stimulates the dephosphorylation of specific Ser/Thr residues within the N-terminal domain of p120, and this in turn stabilizes intercellular adhesion (Petrova et al., 2012).The new tools developed by Kowalczyk’s group (Nanes et al., 2012) will pave the way for researchers to dig further into the mechanism. In the current study, the authors use their newfound tools to analyze the consequences to cell migration when p120-JMD binding is uncoupled from endocytosis. In scratched monolayers of endothelial cells, cell migration was decreased. Importantly, when they examined the VE-cadherin mutant in which p120 binding was blocked but cadherin internalization could proceed normally, cell migration was largely normal. These findings indicate that the migration defects seen in the cells expressing the E-cadherin mutant are rooted in inhibition of endocytosis, rather than lack of p120 recruitment to junctions. They further suggest that endocytic trafficking of cadherins is necessary to transiently destabilize cell–cell contacts that otherwise impede migration. This notion is particularly intriguing given that when E-cadherins are stabilized at intercellular junctions, they can sequester proteins that are required for integrin-based migration (Livshits et al., 2012). Kowalczyk’s findings (Nanes et al., 2012) now suggest a means by which dynamic changes in intercellular adhesion can be achieved to trigger such downstream events.Although less well characterized, there are other regulatory circuits that might also be affected by transiently liberating p120 from intercellular junctions. Thus, for example, p120 enhances cadherin stability through its ability to interact with afadin and Rap1, thereby bridging connections with nectin intercellular junctions (Hoshino et al., 2005). Other direct and indirect p120 associates that might affect cadherin internalization include the endocytic adaptor Numb (Sato et al., 2011) and the signaling enzyme γ-secretase (Kiss et al., 2008). Additionally, p120 can also regulate Rac1 activity, which influences cadherin endocytosis in a clathrin-independent way (Akhtar and Hotchin, 2001). Thus, removing p120 or devising additional mutations to uncouple these interactions may be needed to fully unravel all the mysteries underlying p120’s power in governing intercellular adhesion in tissue development and maintenance (Davis and Reynolds, 2006; Elia et al., 2006; Perez-Moreno et al., 2006; Smalley-Freed et al., 2010; Marciano et al., 2011; Stairs et al., 2011; Chacon-Heszele et al., 2012; Kurley et al., 2012). That said, by dissecting p120’s web at the crossroads between intercellular junction stabilization and endocytosis, Kowalczyk and coworkers (Nanes et al., 2012) now illustrate the power of their approach and provide new insights into how similar strategies might ultimately enable this molecular crossword puzzle to be solved.     

Formation of adherens and communicating junctions coordinate the differentiation of the shedding‐layer and beta‐epidermal generation in regenerating lizard epidermis

In the lizard epidermis, the formation of a stratified alpha‐ and beta‐layer, separated by a shedding complex for molting, suggests that keratinocytes communicate in a coordinated manner after they leave the basal layers during the shedding cycle. I have therefore studied the localization of cell junctional proteins such as beta‐catenin and connexins 43 and 26 during scale regeneration in lizard using immunocytochemistry. Beta‐catenin is also detected in nuclei of basal cells destined to give rise to the Oberhäutchen and beta‐cells suggesting activation of the Wnt‐pathway during beta‐cell differentiation. The observations show that cells of the entire shedding layer (clear and Oberhäutchen) and beta‐layer are connected by beta‐catenin (adherens junctions) and connexins (communicating junctions) during their differentiation. This likely cell coupling determines the formation of a distinct shedding and beta‐layer within the regenerating epidermis. The observed pattern of cell junctional stratification suggests that after departing from the basal layer Oberhäutchen and beta‐cells form a continuous communicating compartment that coordinates the contemporaneous differentiation along the entire scale. While the beta‐layer matures the junctions are lost while other cell junctions are formed in the following mesos‐ and alpha‐cell layers. This process determines the formation of layers with different texture (harder or softer) and the precise localization of the shedding layer within lizard epidermis. J. Morphol. 275:693–702, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Regulation of E-cadherin/Catenin association by tyrosine phosphorylation

Alteration of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion is frequently associated to tyrosine phosphorylation of p120- and beta-catenins. We have examined the role of this modification in these proteins in the control of beta-catenin/E-cadherin binding using in vitro assays with recombinant proteins. Recombinant pp60(c-src) efficiently phosphorylated both catenins in vitro, with stoichiometries of 1.5 and 2.0 mol of phosphate/mol of protein for beta-catenin and p120-catenin, respectively. pp60(c-src) phosphorylation had opposing effects on the affinities of beta-catenin and p120 for the cytosolic domain of E-cadherin; it decreased (in the case of beta-catenin) or increased (for p120) catenin/E-cadherin binding. However, a role for p120-catenin in the modulation of beta-catenin/E-cadherin binding was not observed, since addition of phosphorylated p120-catenin did not modify the affinity of phosphorylated (or unphosphorylated) beta-catenin for E-cadherin. The phosphorylated Tyr residues were identified as Tyr-86 and Tyr-654. Experiments using point mutants in these two residues indicated that, although Tyr-86 was a better substrate for pp60(c-src), only modification of Tyr-654 was relevant for the interaction with E-cadherin. Transient transfections of different mutants demonstrated that Tyr-654 is phosphorylated in conditions in which adherens junctions are disrupted and evidenced that binding of beta-catenin to E-cadherin in vivo is controlled by phosphorylation of beta-catenin Tyr-654.     

Alpha-catenin-Dependent Recruitment of the Centrosomal Protein CAP350 to Adherens Junctions Allows Epithelial Cells to Acquire a Columnar Shape

Epithelial morphogenesis involves a dramatic reorganisation of the microtubule cytoskeleton. How this complex process is controlled at the molecular level is still largely unknown. Here, we report that the centrosomal microtubule (MT)-binding protein CAP350 localises at adherens junctions in epithelial cells. By two-hybrid screening, we identified a direct interaction of CAP350 with the adhesion protein α-catenin that was further confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Block of epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin)-mediated cell-cell adhesion or α-catenin depletion prevented CAP350 localisation at cell-cell junctions. Knocking down junction-located CAP350 inhibited the establishment of an apico-basal array of microtubules and impaired the acquisition of columnar shape in Madin-Darby canine kidney II (MDCKII) cells grown as polarised epithelia. Furthermore, MDCKII cystogenesis was also defective in junctional CAP350-depleted cells. CAP350-depleted MDCKII cysts were smaller and contained either multiple lumens or no lumen. Membrane polarity was not affected, but cortical microtubule bundles did not properly form. Our results indicate that CAP350 may act as an adaptor between adherens junctions and microtubules, thus regulating epithelial differentiation and contributing to the definition of cell architecture. We also uncover a central role of α-catenin in global cytoskeleton remodelling, in which it acts not only on actin but also on MT reorganisation during epithelial morphogenesis.