Deacetylation of the DNA-binding domain regulates p53-mediated apoptosis

In unstressed cells, the p53 tumor suppressor is highly unstable. DNA damage and other forms of cellular stress rapidly stabilize and activate p53. This process is regulated by a complex array of post-translational modifications that are dynamically deposited onto p53. Recent studies show that these modifications orchestrate p53-mediated processes such as cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Cancer cells carry inherent genetic damage, but avoid arrest and apoptosis by inactivating p53. Defining the enzymatic machinery that regulates the stress-induced modification of p53 at single-residue resolution is critical to our understanding of the biochemical mechanisms that control this critical tumor suppressor. Specifically, acetylation of p53 at lysine 120, a DNA-binding domain residue mutated in human cancer, is essential for triggering apoptosis. Given the oncogenic properties of deacetylases and the success of deacetylase inhibitors as anticancer agents, we investigated the regulation of Lys(120) deacetylation using pharmacologic and genetic approaches. This analysis revealed that histone deacetylase 1 is predominantly responsible for the deacetylation of Lys(120). Furthermore, treatment with the clinical-grade histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat enhances Lys(120) acetylation, an event that is mechanistically linked to its apoptotic effect. These data expand our understanding of the mechanisms controlling p53 function and suggest that regulation of p53 modification status at single-residue resolution by targeted therapeutics can selectively alter p53 pathway function. This knowledge may impact the rational application of deacetylase inhibitors in the treatment of human cancer.     

Functional analysis of the acetylation of human p53 in DNA damage responses

As a critical tumor suppressor, p53 is inactivated in human cancer cells by somatic gene mutation or disruption of pathways required for its activation. Therefore, it is critical to elucidate the mechanism underlying p53 activation after genotoxic and cellular stresses. Accumulating evidence has indicated the importance of posttranslational modifications such as acetylation in regulating p53 stability and activity. However, the physiological roles of the eight identified acetylation events in regulating p53 responses remain to be fully understood. By employing homologous recombination, we introduced various combinations of missense mutations (lysine to arginine) into eight acetylation sites of the endogenous p53 gene in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). By determining the p53 responses to DNA damage in the p53 knock-in mutant hESCs and their derivatives, we demonstrate physiological importance of the acetylation events within the core domain (K120 and K164) and at the C-terminus (K370/372/373/381/382/ 386) in regulating human p53 responses to DNA damage.     

Regulation of p14ARF Through Subnuclear Compartmentalization

The p53-mediated pathway cell cycle arrest and apoptosis is central to cancer and an important point of focus for therapeutics development. The p14ARF ("ARF") tumor suppressor induces the p53 pathway in response to oncogene activation or DNA damage. However, ARF is predominantly nucleolar in localization and engages in several interactions with nucleolar proteins, whereas p53 is nucleoplasmic. This raises the question as to how ARF initiates its involvement in the p53 pathway. We have found that UV irradiation of cells disrupts the interaction of ARF with two of its nucleolar binding partners, B23(NPM, nucleophosmin, NO38, numatrin) and topoisomerase I, and promotes an immediate and transient subnuclear redistribution of ARF to the nucleoplasm, where it can engage the p53 pathway (Lee et al, Cancer Research 65:9834-42; 2005). The results support a model in which the nucleolus serves as a p53 upstream sensor of cellular stress, and add to a growing body of evidence that nucleolar sequestration of ARF prevents activation of p53. The results also have therapeutic implications for therapies based on exploiting p53 and other cellular stress response pathways to suppress cancer.     

Acetylation of Lysine 382 and Phosphorylation of Serine 392 in p53 Modulate the Interaction between p53 and MDC1 In Vitro

Occurrence of DNA damage in a cell activates the DNA damage response, a survival mechanism that ensures genomics stability. Two key members of the DNA damage response are the tumor suppressor p53, which is the most frequently mutated gene in cancers, and MDC1, which is a central adaptor that recruits many proteins to sites of DNA damage. Here we characterize the in vitro interaction between p53 and MDC1 and demonstrate that p53 and MDC1 directly interact. The p53-MDC1 interaction is mediated by the tandem BRCT domain of MDC1 and the C-terminal domain of p53. We further show that both acetylation of lysine 382 and phosphorylation of serine 392 in p53 enhance the interaction between p53 and MDC1. Additionally, we demonstrate that the p53-MDC1 interaction is augmented upon the induction of DNA damage in human cells. Our data suggests a new role for acetylation of lysine 382 and phosphorylation of serine 392 in p53 in the cellular stress response and offers the first evidence for an interaction involving MDC1 that is modulated by acetylation.     

Acetylation is indispensable for p53 activation

The activation of the tumor suppressor p53 facilitates the cellular response to genotoxic stress; however, the p53 response can only be executed if its interaction with its inhibitor Mdm2 is abolished. There have been conflicting reports on the question of whether p53 posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation or acetylation, are essential or only play a subtle, fine-tuning role in the p53 response. Thus, it remains unclear whether p53 modification is absolutely required for its activation. We have now identified all major acetylation sites of p53. Although unacetylated p53 retains its ability to induce the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop, loss of acetylation completely abolishes p53-dependent growth arrest and apoptosis. Notably, acetylation of p53 abrogates Mdm2-mediated repression by blocking the recruitment of Mdm2 to p53-responsive promoters, which leads to p53 activation independent of its phosphorylation status. Our study identifies p53 acetylation as an indispensable event that destabilizes the p53-Mdm2 interaction and enables the p53-mediated stress response.     

p300/CBP-mediated p53 acetylation is commonly induced by p53-activating agents and inhibited by MDM2

The tumor suppressor p53 is activated in response to many types of cellular and environmental insults via mechanisms involving post-translational modification. Here we demonstrate that, unlike phosphorylation, p53 invariably undergoes acetylation in cells exposed to a variety of stress-inducing agents including hypoxia, anti-metabolites, nuclear export inhibitor and actinomycin D treatment. In vivo, p53 acetylation is mediated by the p300 and CBP acetyltransferases. Overexpression of either p300 or CBP, but not an acetyltransferase-deficient mutant, efficiently induces specific p53 acetylation. In contrast, MDM2, a negative regulator of p53, actively suppresses p300/CBP-mediated p53 acetylation in vivo and in vitro. This inhibitory activity of MDM2 on p53 acetylation is in turn abrogated by tumor suppressor p19(ARF), indicating that regulation of acetylation is a central target of the p53-MDM2-p19(ARF) feedback loop. Functionally, inhibition of deacetylation promotes p53 stability, suggesting that acetylation plays a positive role in the accumulation of p53 protein in stress response. Our results provide evidence that p300/CBP-mediated acetylation may be a universal and critical modification for p53 function.     

Acetylation of p53 inhibits its ubiquitination by Mdm2

In response to DNA damage, the activity of the p53 tumor suppressor is modulated by protein stabilization and post-translational modifications including acetylation. Interestingly, both acetylation and ubiquitination can modify the same lysine residues at the C terminus of p53, implicating a role of acetylation in the regulation of p53 stability. However, the direct effect of acetylation on Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination of p53 is still lacking because of technical difficulties. Here, we have developed a method to obtain pure acetylated p53 proteins from cells, and by using an in vitro purified system, we provide the direct evidence that acetylation of the C-terminal domain is sufficient to abrogate its ubiquitination by Mdm2. Importantly, even in the absence of DNA damage, acetylation of the p53 protein is capable of reducing the ubiquitination levels and extending its half-life in vivo. Moreover, we also show that acetylation of p53 can affect its ubiquitination through other mechanisms in addition to the site competition. This study has significant implications regarding a general mechanism by which protein acetylation modulates ubiquitination-dependent proteasome proteolysis.     

DNA damage, p14ARF, Nucleophosmin (NPM/B23), and cancer

The p53/p14ARF/mdm2 stress response pathway plays a central role in mediating cellular responses to oncogene activation, genome instability, and therapy-induced DNA damage. Abrogation of the pathway occurs in most if not all cancers, and may be essential for tumor development. The high frequency with which the pathway is disabled in cancer and the fact that the pathway appears to be incompatible with tumor cell growth, has made it an important point of focus in cancer research and therapeutics development. Recently, Nucleophosmin (NPM, B23, NO38 and numatrin), a multifunctional nucleolar protein, has emerged as a p14ARF binding protein and regulator of p53. While complex formation between ARF and NPM retains ARF in the nucleolus and prevents ARF from activating p53, DNA damaging treatments promote a transient subnuclear redistribution of ARF to the nucleoplasm, where it interacts with mdm2 and promotes p53 activation. The results add support to a recently proposed model in which the nucleolus serves as a p53-uspstream sensor of stress, and where ARF links nucleolar stress signals to nucleoplasmic effectors of the stress response. A better understanding of ARF’s nucleolar interactions could further elucidate the regulation of the p53 pathway and suggest new therapeutic approaches to restore p53 function.     

Tip60-dependent acetylation of p53 modulates the decision between cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis

Upon DNA damage and other types of stress, p53 induces either cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis depending on the cellular context. However, the molecular mechanisms that govern the choice between cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis are not well understood. Here, we show that Tip60 is required for both cell growth arrest and apoptosis mediated by p53 and also induces its acetylation specifically at lysine 120 (K120) within the DNA-binding domain. Interestingly, this modification is crucial for p53-dependent apoptosis but is dispensable for its mediated growth arrest. K120 is a recurrent site for p53 mutation in human cancer, and the corresponding acetylation-defective tumor mutant (K120R) abrogates p53-mediated apoptosis, but not growth arrest. Thus, our study demonstrates that Tip60-dependent acetylation of p53 at K120 modulates the decision between cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis, and it reveals that the DNA-binding core domain is an important target for p53 regulation by posttranslational modifications.     

MDM2-HDAC1-mediated deacetylation of p53 is required for its degradation

The tumor suppressor p53 is stabilized and activated in response to cellular stress through post-translational modifications including acetylation. p300/CBP-mediated acetylation of p53 is negatively regulated by MDM2. Here we show that MDM2 can promote p53 deacetylation by recruiting a complex containing HDAC1. The HDAC1 complex binds MDM2 in a p53-independent manner and deacetylates p53 at all known acetylated lysines in vivo. Ectopic expression of a dominant-negative HDAC1 mutant restores p53 acetylation in the presence of MDM2, whereas wild-type HDAC1 and MDM2 deacetylate p53 synergistically. Fibroblasts overexpressing a dominant negative HDAC1 mutant display enhanced DNA damage-induced p53 acetylation, increased levels of p53 and a more pronounced induction of p21 and MDM2. These results indicate that acetylation promotes p53 stability and function. As the acetylated p53 lysine residues overlap with those that are ubiquitylated, our results suggest that one major function of p53 acetylation is to promote p53 stability by preventing MDM2-dependent ubiquitylation, while recruitment of HDAC1 by MDM2 promotes p53 degradation by removing these acetyl groups.     

Regulation of p53: The next generation

The p53 protein is one of the most important tumor suppressor proteins. The most prevailing property of this tumor suppressor protein is its activation in response to DNA damage which counteracts the propagation of genetic alterations to daughter cells under conditions that provoke mutagenesis. In response to DNA damage and some other kinds of cellular stress the turnover of p53 is reduced or completely switched-off, which leads to a strong increase in the amount of the p53 protein and subsequently to the implementation of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Although post-translational modifications of p53 certainly contribute to the activation of p53 under physiologic conditions, an increase in the amount of the protein e.g. after overexpression, is sufficient for p53's deadly activities. This makes this tumor suppressor protein an interesting target for cancer therapy. This article summarizes the most important principles for the regulation of p53, with a particular focus on recent findings. Furthermore, open questions and possible future directions shall be discussed.