SMC5 and SMC6 genes are required for the segregation of repetitive chromosome regions

Structure chromosome (SMC) proteins organize the core of cohesin, condensin and Smc5-Smc6 complexes. The Smc5-Smc6 complex is required for DNA repair, as well as having another essential but enigmatic function. Here, we generated conditional mutants of SMC5 and SMC6 in budding yeast, in which the essential function was affected. We show that mutant smc5-6 and smc6-9 cells undergo an aberrant mitosis in which chromosome segregation of repetitive regions is impaired; this leads to DNA damage and RAD9-dependent activation of the Rad53 protein kinase. Consistent with a requirement for the segregation of repetitive regions, Smc5 and Smc6 proteins are enriched at ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and at some telomeres. We show that, following Smc5-Smc6 inactivation, metaphase-arrested cells show increased levels of X-shaped DNA (Holliday junctions) at the rDNA locus. Furthermore, deletion of RAD52 partially suppresses the temperature sensitivity of smc5-6 and smc6-9 mutants. We also present evidence showing that the rDNA segregation defects of smc5/smc6 mutants are mechanistically different from those previously observed for condensin mutants. These results point towards a role for the Smc5-Smc6 complex in preventing the formation of sister chromatid junctions, thereby ensuring the correct partitioning of chromosomes during anaphase.     

The Smc5-Smc6 complex is required to remove chromosome junctions in meiosis

Meiosis, a specialized cell division with a single cycle of DNA replication round and two consecutive rounds of nuclear segregation, allows for the exchange of genetic material between parental chromosomes and the formation of haploid gametes. The structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) proteins aid manipulation of chromosome structures inside cells. Eukaryotic SMC complexes include cohesin, condensin and the Smc5-Smc6 complex. Meiotic roles have been discovered for cohesin and condensin. However, although Smc5-Smc6 is known to be required for successful meiotic divisions, the meiotic functions of the complex are not well understood. Here we show that the Smc5-Smc6 complex localizes to specific chromosome regions during meiotic prophase I. We report that meiotic cells lacking Smc5-Smc6 undergo catastrophic meiotic divisions as a consequence of unresolved linkages between chromosomes. Surprisingly, meiotic segregation defects are not rescued by abrogation of Spo11-induced meiotic recombination, indicating that at least some chromosome linkages in smc5-smc6 mutants originate from other cellular processes. These results demonstrate that, as in mitosis, Smc5-Smc6 is required to ensure proper chromosome segregation during meiosis by preventing aberrant recombination intermediates between homologous chromosomes.     

Nse1 RING-like domain supports functions of the Smc5-Smc6 holocomplex in genome stability

The Smc5-Smc6 holocomplex plays essential but largely enigmatic roles in chromosome segregation, and facilitates DNA repair. The Smc5-Smc6 complex contains six conserved non-SMC subunits. One of these, Nse1, contains a RING-like motif that often confers ubiquitin E3 ligase activity. We have functionally characterized the Nse1 RING-like motif, to determine its contribution to the chromosome segregation and DNA repair roles of Smc5-Smc6. Strikingly, whereas a full deletion of nse1 is lethal, the Nse1 RING-like motif is not essential for cellular viability. However, Nse1 RING mutant cells are hypersensitive to a broad spectrum of genotoxic stresses, indicating that the Nse1 RING motif promotes DNA repair functions of Smc5-Smc6. We tested the ability of both human and yeast Nse1 to mediate ubiquitin E3 ligase activity in vitro and found no detectable activity associated with full-length Nse1 or the isolated RING domains. Interestingly, however, the Nse1 RING-like domain is required for normal Nse1-Nse3-Nse4 trimer formation in vitro and for damage-induced recruitment of Nse4 and Smc5 to subnuclear foci in vivo. Thus, we propose that the Nse1 RING-like motif is a protein–protein interaction domain required for Smc5-Smc6 holocomplex integrity and recruitment to, or retention at, DNA lesions.     

Smc5/6-mediated regulation of replication progression contributes to chromosome assembly during mitosis in human cells

The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins constitute the core of critical complexes involved in structural organization of chromosomes. In yeast, the Smc5/6 complex is known to mediate repair of DNA breaks and replication of repetitive genomic regions, including ribosomal DNA loci and telomeres. In mammalian cells, which have diverse genome structure and scale from yeast, the Smc5/6 complex has also been implicated in DNA damage response, but its further function in unchallenged conditions remains elusive. In this study, we addressed the behavior and function of Smc5/6 during the cell cycle. Chromatin fractionation, immunofluorescence, and live-cell imaging analyses indicated that Smc5/6 associates with chromatin during interphase but largely dissociates from chromosomes when they condense in mitosis. Depletion of Smc5 and Smc6 resulted in aberrant mitotic chromosome phenotypes that were accompanied by the abnormal distribution of topoisomerase IIα (topo IIα) and condensins and by chromosome segregation errors. Importantly, interphase chromatin structure indicated by the premature chromosome condensation assay suggested that Smc5/6 is required for the on-time progression of DNA replication and subsequent binding of topo IIα on replicated chromatids. These results indicate an essential role of the Smc5/6 complex in processing DNA replication, which becomes indispensable for proper sister chromatid assembly in mitosis.     

H2A.Z-Dependent Regulation of Cohesin Dynamics on Chromosome Arms

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes and DNA topoisomerases are major determinants of chromosome structure and dynamics. The cohesin complex embraces sister chromatids throughout interphase, but during mitosis most cohesin is stripped from chromosome arms by early prophase, while the remaining cohesin at kinetochores is cleaved at anaphase. This two-step removal of cohesin is required for sister chromatids to separate. The cohesin-related Smc5/6 complex has been studied mostly as a determinant of DNA repair via homologous recombination. However, chromosome segregation fails in Smc5/6 null mutants or cells treated with small interfering RNAs. This also occurs in Smc5/6 hypomorphs in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe following genotoxic and replication stress, or topoisomerase II dysfunction, and these mitotic defects are due to the postanaphase retention of cohesin on chromosome arms. Here we show that mitotic and repair roles for Smc5/6 are genetically separable in S. pombe. Further, we identified the histone variant H2A.Z as a critical factor to modulate cohesin dynamics, and cells lacking H2A.Z suppress the mitotic defects conferred by Smc5/6 dysfunction. Together, H2A.Z and the SMC complexes ensure genome integrity through accurate chromosome segregation.     

The Smc5-Smc6 DNA repair complex. bridging of the Smc5-Smc6 heads by the KLEISIN, Nse4, and non-Kleisin subunits

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins play fundamental roles in many aspects of chromosome organization and dynamics. The SMC complexes form unique structures with long coiled-coil arms folded at a hinge domain, so that the globular N- and C-terminal domains are brought together to form a "head." Within the Smc5-Smc6 complex, we previously identified two subcomplexes containing Smc6-Smc5-Nse2 and Nse1-Nse3-Nse4. A third subcomplex containing Nse5 and -6 has also been identified recently. We present evidence that Nse4 is the kleisin component of the complex, which bridges the heads of Smc5 and -6. The C-terminal part of Nse4 interacts with the head domain of Smc5, and structural predictions for Nse4 proteins suggest similar motifs that are shared within the kleisin family. Specific mutations within a predicted winged helix motif of Nse4 destroy the interaction with Smc5. We propose that Nse4 and its orthologs form the delta-kleisin subfamily. We further show that Nse3, as well as Nse5 and Nse6, also bridge the heads of Smc5 and -6. The Nse1-Nse3-Nse4 and Nse5-Nse6 subcomplexes bind to the Smc5-Smc6 heads domain at different sites.     

Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination

DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) can arise during DNA replication, or after exposure to DNA-damaging agents, and their correct repair is fundamental for cell survival and genomic stability. Here, we show that the Smc5-Smc6 complex is recruited to DSBs de novo to support their repair by homologous recombination between sister chromatids. In addition, we demonstrate that Smc5-Smc6 is necessary to suppress gross chromosomal rearrangements. Our findings show that the Smc5-Smc6 complex is essential for genome stability as it promotes repair of DSBs by error-free sister-chromatid recombination (SCR), thereby suppressing inappropriate non-sister recombination events.     

Smc5-Smc6-Dependent Removal of Cohesin from Mitotic Chromosomes

The function of the essential cohesin-related Smc5-Smc6 complex has remained elusive, though hypomorphic mutants have defects late in recombination, in checkpoint maintenance, and in chromosome segregation. Recombination and checkpoints are not essential for viability, and Smc5-Smc6-null mutants die in lethal mitoses. This suggests that the chromosome segregation defects may be the source of lethality in irradiated Smc5-Smc6 hypomorphs. We show that in smc6 mutants, following DNA damage in interphase, chromosome arm segregation fails due to an aberrant persistence of cohesin, which is normally removed by the Separase-independent pathway. This postanaphase persistence of cohesin is not dependent on DNA damage, since the synthetic lethality of smc6 hypomorphs with a topoisomerase II mutant, defective in mitotic chromosome structure, is also due to the retention of cohesin on undamaged chromosome arms. In both cases, Separase overexpression bypasses the defect and restores cell viability, showing that defective cohesin removal is a major determinant of the mitotic lethality of Smc5-Smc6 mutants.Three essential SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) complexes control chromosome dynamics: condensin, cohesin, and the Smc5-Smc6 complex (37). They are composed of SMC heterodimers: Smc2 and -4 in condensin, Smc1 and -3 in cohesin, and Smc5 and -6 in Smc5-Smc6. These are large ATPases with globular N and C termini, which are separated by long coiled-coil domains. The termini interact through an ABC-like coordination of ATP through Walker A and B motifs, with the coiled-coils bending at a flexible “hinge” that acts as the SMC dimerization domain. Each complex contains a number of unique non-Smc subunits, which are likely to contribute to its unique function. Among these is a kleisin subunit, which interacts with both the SMC subunits, closing a potential ring-shaped structure (55, 61).Condensin is localized to chromosomes primarily during mitosis and is essential for mitotic chromosome condensation. Conversely, cohesin is localized primarily to interphase chromosomes and has been postulated to form a ring-shaped structure around sister chromatids to ensure their cohesion, which is important for DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR). As its name suggests, the function of the Smc5-Smc6 complex is relatively poorly understood.Scc2/4 loads cohesin onto chromosomes in G₁, and sister chromatid cohesion is established during replication via the action of the acetyltransferase Eco1. Cohesin must be removed before chromosome segregation, where cleavage of the kleisin subunit Scc1 by the protease Separase is critical (51). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Separase-mediated Scc1 cleavage is essential for the removal of cohesin from all loci. In mammals, most cohesin is removed from chromosome arms early in mitosis in a Separase-independent process regulated by cohesin phosphorylation (28, 76). At anaphase, Separase-dependent removal of cohesin at the kinetochores ensures sister chromatid separation. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, cohesin is thought to be regulated in a manner similar to that in mammals; only a small fraction of the Scc1 homolog Rad21 is cleaved by Separase (70), suggesting that most cohesin is removed by a Separase-independent mechanism.Cohesin-mediated sister chromatid cohesion is required for HR (64). Cohesin is recruited to double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) (66) and enforces cohesion genome wide after DNA damage in S. cerevisiae (65, 74). The acetyltransferase activity of Eco1 is essential for genomewide damage-induced cohesion, acting via the acetylation of Smc3 (6, 73, 81). In human cells, small interfering RNA (siRNA) studies have suggested a requirement for Smc5-Smc6 to recruit cohesin to DSBs (57), but this is not the case in S. cerevisiae (65), so the functional relationship between these related complexes also remains to be determined.In S. cerevisiae, Smc5-Smc6 is loaded onto chromatin by the cohesin loader Scc2/4 at loci that overlap with cohesin, including at DSBs (36). Smc5-Smc6-null mutants of S. pombe die in aberrant mitoses (27, 75), though the cause of this is unknown. Genetic analyses of Smc5-Smc6 in these yeasts have focused on its role in DNA repair by utilizing viable hypomorphic mutants that are highly sensitive to DNA damage. Studies with two hypomorphic smc6 mutants, bearing the smc6-X and smc6-74 mutations, have shown that Smc5-Smc6 is required for a late stage of HR subsequent to the recruitment of the Rad51/Rad52 recombination proteins and the formation of recombination intermediates (2). smc6-74 is a mutation (A151T) in the arginine finger motif of the N-terminal globular domain, while smc6-X is a mutation (R706C) in the hinge domain. Overexpression of Brc1, a multi-BRCT domain protein, suppresses the DNA damage sensitivities of several Smc5-Smc6 mutants but does not suppress smc6-X (45, 75). smc6-74 mutants, but not smc6-X mutants, are also defective in an early response to replication fork stalling, involving the recruitment of Rad52 but not Rad51 (30).As with cohesin, the HR defects in Smc5-Smc6 hypomorphic mutants are likely to result from a more general role in chromosome organization than acting as a recombinase. Smc5-Smc6 is required for HR following irradiation or recovery from hydroxyurea (HU)-induced replication arrest (2, 18, 27, 34, 35, 71, 75). However, in contrast to the sustained checkpoint arrest of irradiated HR mutants, S. pombe Smc5-Smc6 hypomorphs, such as that with the smc6-74 mutation, enter highly aberrant mitoses following DNA damage. For DSBs induced by ionizing radiation, smc6 mutants progress into mitosis with wild-type kinetics, but, as shown by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), the chromosomes are highly fragmented (75). In each case, the mitotic defects are blocked by an earlier (upstream) HR defect (2, 27, 43). The chromosome segregation and recombination defects are apparent on each of the three S. pombe chromosomes and are not limited to the ribosomal DNA present on both ends of chromosome III.These aberrant mitoses of Smc5-Smc6 mutants following DNA damage either block segregation completely (the “cut” phenotype, where the division septum bisects the nucleus) or result in partially segregated chromosomes that are incompletely resolved along the division plane, with an elongated mitotic spindle. Since Smc5-Smc6 is required to maintain a damage induced checkpoint arrest, the aberrant mitoses of Smc5-Smc6 mutants could result from attempting to segregate incompletely repaired chromosomes. Alternatively, defects may reflect a role for Smc5-Smc6 in promoting chromosome segregation that is revealed in hypomorphic mutants following exogenous DNA damage but is evident in null mutants without DNA damage or with low-level endogenous lesions. Notably, while viable, the hypomorphic mutants show a high level of spontaneous aneuploidy, which is also consistent with defects in chromosome segregation (35, 75).Another characteristic of smc6 mutants in S. pombe is a strong synthetic lethality with a temperature-sensitive (ts) allele of topoisomerase II (Top2), top2-191, at a permissive temperature for top2-191 of 30°C. This lethality is due to a failure of chromosome segregation that resembles mitoses in irradiated smc6-74 cells (75). top2-191 is a A802V mutation (63), and cells with this mutation show no defects in cell cycle progression at 30°C. At 36°C, top2-191 cells enter mitosis with normal kinetics but fail to segregate chromosomes. The defects of top2-191 cells at the restrictive temperature of 36°C manifest exclusively in mitosis without an interphase delay and include defective chromosome condensation. Therefore, the top2-191 allele may not affect the postreplicative decatenation activity of Top2 in S. pombe. Rather, the smc6-top2-191 interaction may be related to the structural role played by Top2 in mitotic chromosome architecture (12, 14, 79).In vertebrate cells, defective decatenation caused by Top2 inhibition with drugs such as etoposide or doxorubicin block the rejoining of molecules cleaved by Top2. This leaves DSBs that elicit a G₂ DNA damage checkpoint response in many cell types (13, 16, 17, 38). Conversely, human cells in which Top2 has been deleted enter mitosis but show disordered chromosomes that fail to segregate (12). Thus, in S. pombe, top2-191 has a terminal phenotype more closely related to that of human cells with Top2 deleted than to that of cells with chemically inhibited Top2 that are blocked midway in the decatenation reaction.Here we have investigated the mitotic role of Smc5-Smc6 in S. pombe. We find that Smc5-Smc6 is required for the removal of cohesin from damaged chromosome arms prior to anaphase and from undamaged chromosomes when the mitotic function of Top2 is compromised. We show that a defect in cohesin removal is a major determinant of lethality in smc6 mutants and highlight the importance of coordinating Smc5-Smc6 and cohesin function in the maintenance of genome integrity.     

The Smc5/6 complex is required for dissolution of DNA-mediated sister chromatid linkages

Mitotic chromosome segregation requires the removal of physical connections between sister chromatids. In addition to cohesin and topological entrapments, sister chromatid separation can be prevented by the presence of chromosome junctions or ongoing DNA replication. We will collectively refer to them as DNA-mediated linkages. Although this type of structures has been documented in different DNA replication and repair mutants, there is no known essential mechanism ensuring their timely removal before mitosis. Here, we show that the dissolution of these connections is an active process that requires the Smc5/6 complex, together with Mms21, its associated SUMO-ligase. Failure to remove DNA-mediated linkages causes gross chromosome missegregation in anaphase. Moreover, we show that Smc5/6 is capable to dissolve them in metaphase-arrested cells, thus restoring chromosome resolution and segregation. We propose that Smc5/6 has an essential role in the removal of DNA-mediated linkages to prevent chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy.     

Functional interplay between cohesin and Smc5/6 complexes

Chromosomes are subjected to massive reengineering as they are replicated, transcribed, repaired, condensed, and segregated into daughter cells. Among the engineers are three large protein complexes collectively known as the structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) complexes: cohesin, condensin, and Smc5/6. As their names suggest, cohesin controls sister chromatid cohesion, condensin controls chromosome condensation, and while precise functions for Smc5/6 have remained somewhat elusive, most reports have focused on the control of recombinational DNA repair. Here, we focus on cohesin and Smc5/6 function. It is becoming increasingly clear that the functional repertoires of these complexes are greater than sister chromatid cohesion and recombination. These SMC complexes are emerging as interrelated and cooperating factors that control chromosome dynamics throughout interphase. However, they also release their embrace of sister chromatids to enable their segregation at anaphase, resetting the dynamic cycle of SMC-chromosome interactions.     

Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways

The SMC protein complexes safeguard genomic integrity through their functions in chromosome segregation and repair. The chromosomal localization of the budding yeast Smc5/6 complex determined here reveals that the complex works specifically on the duplicated genome in differently regulated pathways. The first controls the association to centromeres and chromosome arms in unchallenged cells, the second regulates the association to DNA breaks, and the third directs the complex to the chromosome arm that harbors the ribosomal DNA arrays. The chromosomal interaction pattern predicts a function that becomes more important with increasing chromosome length and that the complex's role in unchallenged cells is independent of DNA damage. Additionally, localization of Smc6 to collapsed replication forks indicates an involvement in their rescue. Altogether this shows that the complex maintains genomic integrity in multiple ways, and evidence is presented that the Smc5/6 complex is needed during replication to prevent the accumulation of branched chromosome structures.     

Interaction mapping between Saccharomyces cerevisiae Smc5 and SUMO E3 ligase Mms21

The multisubunit Smc5-Smc6 holocomplex (Smc5/6) plays a critical role in chromosome stability maintenance, DNA replication, homologous recombination, and double-stranded DNA damage repair. Smc5 and Smc6 form the core of the holocomplex, along with six non-SMC elements, for which most functions are not yet understood. Mms21 (Nse2), the relatively well-studied subunit in Smc5/6, contains a SP-like-RING finger motif on the C-terminus and was identified as a SUMO E3 ligase. Deletion of Mms21 is lethal; however, while deficient in DNA damage repair, SUMO ligase mutants remain viable. These functions of Mms21 in Smc5/6 are hard to address without understanding the interaction between Smc5 and Mms21. Previously, we systematically examined the architecture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Smc5/6 and, using yeast two-hybrid methods, found that Mms21 interacts with the coiled-coil of Smc5. Later, crystallographic studies revealed the molecular arrangement of Mms21 with Smc5/6. For this study, we use a combination of limited proteolysis, mass spectrometry, and N-terminal sequencing to precisely define the interaction region of Smc5 with Mms21. In addition, using isothermal titration calorimetry, we find that Mms21 interacts with Smc5 in a 1:1 ratio with a K(d) of 0.68 μM. This combination of methods would be useful in examining the structure of any large multiprotein complex.     

The Smc5-Smc6 Complex Regulates Recombination at Centromeric Regions and Affects Kinetochore Protein Sumoylation during Normal Growth

The Smc5-Smc6 complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is both essential for growth and important for coping with genotoxic stress. While it facilitates damage tolerance throughout the genome under genotoxin treatment, its function during unperturbed growth is mainly documented for repetitive DNA sequence maintenance. Here we provide physical and genetic evidence showing that the Smc5–Smc6 complex regulates recombination at non-repetitive loci such as centromeres in the absence of DNA damaging agents. Mutating Smc6 results in the accumulation of recombination intermediates at centromeres and other unique sequences as assayed by 2D gel analysis. In addition, smc6 mutant cells exhibit increased levels of Rad52 foci that co-localize with centromere markers. A rad52 mutation that decreases centromeric, but not overall, levels of Rad52 foci in smc6 mutants suppresses the nocodazole sensitivity of these cells, suggesting that the Smc6-mediated regulation of recombination at centromeric regions impacts centromere-related functions. In addition to influencing recombination, the SUMO ligase subunit of the Smc5–Smc6 complex promotes the sumoylation of two kinetochore proteins and affects mitotic spindles. These results suggest that the Smc5–Smc6 complex regulates both recombination and kinetochore sumoylation to facilitate chromosomal maintenance during growth.     

Smc5-Smc6 complex suppresses gross chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replications

Translocations in chromosomes alter genetic information. Although the frequent translocations observed in many tumors suggest the altered genetic information by translocation could promote tumorigenesis, the mechanisms for how translocations are suppressed and produced are poorly understood. The smc6-9 mutation increased the translocation class gross chromosomal rearrangement (GCR). Translocations produced in the smc6-9 strain are unique because they are non-reciprocal and dependent on break-induced replication (BIR) and independent of non-homologous end joining. The high incidence of translocations near repetitive sequences such as delta sequences, ARS, tRNA genes, and telomeres in the smc6-9 strain indicates that Smc5-Smc6 suppresses translocations by reducing DNA damage at repetitive sequences. Synergistic enhancements of translocations in strains defective in DNA damage checkpoints by the smc6-9 mutation without affecting de novo telomere addition class GCR suggest that Smc5-Smc6 defines a new pathway to suppress GCR formation.     

SMC complexes and topoisomerase II work together so that sister chromatids can work apart

The pairing of sister chromatids in interphase facilitates error-free homologous recombination (HR). Sister chromatids are held together by cohesin, one of three Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) complexes. In mitosis, chromosome condensation is controlled by another SMC complex, condensin, and the type II topoisomerase (Top2). In prophase, cohesin is stripped from chromosome arms, but remains at centromeres until anaphase, whereupon it is removed via proteolytic cleavage. The third SMC complex, Smc5/6, is generally described as a regulator of HR-mediated DNA repair. However, cohesin and condensin are also required for DNA repair, and HR genes are not essential for cell viability, but the SMC complexes are. Smc5/6 null mutants die in mitosis, and in fission yeast, Smc5/6 hypomorphs show lethal mitoses following genotoxic stress, or when combined with a Top2 mutant, top2-191. We found these mitotic defects are due to retention of cohesin on chromosome arms. We also show that Top2 functions in the cohesin cycle, and accumulating data suggests this is not related to its decatenation activity. Thus the SMC complexes and Top2 functionally interact, and any DNA repair function ascribed to Smc5/6 is likely a reflection of a more fundamental role in the regulation of chromosome structure.     

Cleavage of cohesin rings coordinates the separation of centrioles and chromatids

Cohesin pairs sister chromatids by forming a tripartite Scc1-Smc1-Smc3 ring around them. In mitosis, cohesin is removed from chromosome arms by the phosphorylation-dependent prophase pathway. Centromeric cohesin is protected by shugoshin 1 and protein phosphatase 2A (Sgo1-PP2A) and opened only in anaphase by separase-dependent cleavage of Scc1 (refs 4-6). Following chromosome segregation, centrioles loosen their tight orthogonal arrangement, which licenses later centrosome duplication in S phase. Although a role of separase in centriole disengagement has been reported, the molecular details of this process remain enigmatic. Here, we identify cohesin as a centriole-engagement factor. Both premature sister-chromatid separation and centriole disengagement are induced by ectopic activation of separase or depletion of Sgo1. These unscheduled events are suppressed by expression of non-cleavable Scc1 or inhibition of the prophase pathway. When endogenous Scc1 is replaced by artificially cleavable Scc1, the corresponding site-specific protease triggers centriole disengagement. Separation of centrioles can alternatively be induced by ectopic cleavage of an engineered Smc3. Thus, the chromosome and centrosome cycles exhibit extensive parallels and are coordinated with each other by dual use of the cohesin ring complex.     

Smc5p promotes faithful chromosome transmission and DNA repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Heterodimers of structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins form the core of several protein complexes involved in the organization of DNA, including condensation and cohesion of the chromosomes at metaphase. The functions of the complexes with a heterodimer of Smc5p and Smc6p are less clear. To better understand them, we created two S. cerevisiae strains bearing temperature-sensitive alleles of SMC5. When shifted to the restrictive temperature, both mutants lose viability gradually, concomitant with the appearance of nuclear abnormalities and phosphorylation of the Rad53p DNA damage checkpoint protein. Removal of Rad52p or overexpression of the SUMO ligase Mms21p partially suppresses the temperature sensitivity of smc5 strains and increases their survival at the restrictive temperature. At the permissive temperature, smc5-31 but not smc5-33 cells exhibit hypersensitivity to several DNA-damaging agents despite induction of the DNA damage checkpoint. Similarly, smc5-31 but not smc5-33 cells are killed by overexpression of the SUMO ligase-defective Mms21-SAp but not by overexpression of wild-type Mms21p. Both smc5 alleles are synthetically lethal with mms21-SA and exhibit Rad52p-independent chromosome fragmentation and loss at semipermissive temperatures. Our data indicate a critical role for the S. cerevisiae Smc5/6-containing complexes in both DNA repair and chromosome segregation.     

The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus

Homologous recombination (HR) is crucial for maintaining genome integrity by repairing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and rescuing collapsed replication forks. In contrast, uncontrolled HR can lead to chromosome translocations, loss of heterozygosity, and deletion of repetitive sequences. Controlled HR is particularly important for the preservation of repetitive sequences of the ribosomal gene (rDNA) cluster. Here we show that recombinational repair of a DSB in rDNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves the transient relocalization of the lesion to associate with the recombination machinery at an extranucleolar site. The nucleolar exclusion of Rad52 recombination foci entails Mre11 and Smc5-Smc6 complexes and depends on Rad52 SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) modification. Remarkably, mutations that abrogate these activities result in the formation of Rad52 foci within the nucleolus and cause rDNA hyperrecombination and the excision of extrachromosomal rDNA circles. Our study also suggests a key role of sumoylation for nucleolar dynamics, perhaps in the compartmentalization of nuclear activities.     

Cohesin: a catenase with separate entry and exit gates?

Cohesin confers both intrachromatid and interchromatid cohesion through formation of a tripartite ring within which DNA is thought to be entrapped. Here, I discuss what is known about the four stages of the cohesin ring cycle using the ring model as an intellectual framework. I postulate that cohesin loading onto chromosomes, catalysed by a separate complex called kollerin, is mediated by the entry of DNA into cohesin rings, whereas dissociation, catalysed by Wapl and several other cohesin subunits (an activity that will be called releasin here), is mediated by the subsequent exit of DNA. I suggest that the ring's entry and exit gates may be separate, with the former and latter taking place at Smc1-Smc3 and Smc3-kleisin interfaces, respectively. Establishment of cohesion during S phase involves neutralization of releasin through acetylation of Smc3 at a site close to the putative exit gate of DNA, which locks rings shut until opened irreversibly by kleisin cleavage through the action of separase, an event that triggers the metaphase to anaphase transition.     

Abrupt telomere losses and reduced end-resection can explain accelerated senescence of Smc5/6 mutants lacking telomerase

The highly conserved Structural Maintenance of Chromosome (SMC) proteins are crucial for the formation of three essential complexes involved in high fidelity chromosome transmission during cell division. Recently, the Smc5/6 complex has been reported to be important for telomere maintenance in yeast and also in cancerous human ALT cells, where it could function in a homologous recombination-based (HR) telomere maintenance pathway. Here, we investigate the possible roles of the budding yeast Smc5/6 complex in maintaining appropriate chromosome end-structures allowing cell survival in absence of telomerase. The results show that cells harbouring mutant alleles of genes encoding Smc5/6-complex proteins rapidly stop growing after telomerase loss. Furthermore, this telomerase-induced growth arrest is much more pronounced as compared to cultures with a functional Smc5/6-complex. Bulk telomere sequence loss is not increased in the mutant cells and the evidence suggests that Smc5/6 slows senescence through a partially HR-independent pathway. We propose that in yeast, the Smc5/6-complex is required for efficient and timely termination of DNA replication and repair at telomeres to avoid stochastic telomere loss during cell division. Consistent with this hypothesis, sequencing of telomeres from telomerase-positive smc5/6 mutant cells revealed a higher frequency of telomere breakage events. Finally, the results also show that on dysfunctional telomeres, the generation of 3'-single stranded DNA is impaired, suggesting that the complex may also participate in the formation of single-stranded overhangs which are thought to be the substrates for telomere repeat replenishment in the absence of telomerase.