Proofreading of DNA polymerase eta-dependent replication errors

Human DNA polymerase eta, the product of the skin cancer susceptibility gene XPV, bypasses UV photoproducts in template DNA that block synthesis by other DNA polymerases. Pol eta lacks an intrinsic proofreading exonuclease and copies DNA with low fidelity, such that pol eta errors could contribute to mutagenesis unless they are corrected. Here we provide evidence that pol eta can compete with other human polymerases during replication of duplex DNA, and in so doing it lowers replication fidelity. However, we show that pol eta has low processivity and extends mismatched primer termini less efficiently than matched termini. These properties could provide an opportunity for extrinsic exonuclease(s) to proofread pol eta-induced replication errors. When we tested this hypothesis during replication in human cell extracts, pol eta-induced replication infidelity was found to be modulated by changing the dNTP concentration and to be enhanced by adding dGMP to a replication reaction. Both effects are classical hallmarks of exonucleolytic proofreading. Thus, pol eta is ideally suited for its role in reducing UV-induced mutagenesis and skin cancer risk, in that its relaxed base selectivity may facilitate efficient bypass of UV photoproducts, while subsequent proofreading by extrinsic exonuclease(s) may reduce its mutagenic potential.     

Antimutator variants of DNA polymerases

Evolution balances DNA replication speed and accuracy to optimize replicative fitness and genetic stability. There is no selective pressure to improve DNA replication fidelity beyond the background mutation rate from other sources, such as DNA damage. However, DNA polymerases remain amenable to amino acid substitutions that lower intrinsic error rates. Here, we review these 'antimutagenic' changes in DNA polymerases and discuss what they reveal about mechanisms of replication fidelity. Pioneering studies with bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase (T4 Pol) established the paradigm that antimutator amino acid substitutions reduce replication errors by increasing proofreading efficiency at the expense of polymerase processivity. The discoveries of antimutator substitutions in proofreading-deficient 'mutator' derivatives of bacterial Pols I and III and yeast Pol δ suggest there must be additional antimutagenic mechanisms. Remarkably, many of the affected amino acid positions from Pol I, Pol III, and Pol δ are similar to the original T4 Pol substitutions. The locations of antimutator substitutions within DNA polymerase structures suggest that they may increase nucleotide selectivity and/or promote dissociation of primer termini from polymerases poised for misincorporation, leading to expulsion of incorrect nucleotides. If misincorporation occurs, enhanced primer dissociation from polymerase domains may improve proofreading in cis by an intrinsic exonuclease or in trans by alternate cellular proofreading activities. Together, these studies reveal that natural selection can readily restore replication error rates to sustainable levels following an adaptive mutator phenotype.     

Antimutator variants of DNA polymerases

Evolution balances DNA replication speed and accuracy to optimize replicative fitness and genetic stability. There is no selective pressure to improve DNA replication fidelity beyond the background mutation rate from other sources, such as DNA damage. However, DNA polymerases remain amenable to amino acid substitutions that lower intrinsic error rates. Here, we review these ‘antimutagenic’ changes in DNA polymerases and discuss what they reveal about mechanisms of replication fidelity. Pioneering studies with bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase (T4 Pol) established the paradigm that antimutator amino acid substitutions reduce replication errors by increasing proofreading efficiency at the expense of polymerase processivity. The discoveries of antimutator substitutions in proofreading-deficient ‘mutator’ derivatives of bacterial Pols I and III and yeast Pol δ suggest there must be additional antimutagenic mechanisms. Remarkably, many of the affected amino acid positions from Pol I, Pol III, and Pol δ are similar to the original T4 Pol substitutions. The locations of antimutator substitutions within DNA polymerase structures suggest that they may increase nucleotide selectivity and/or promote dissociation of primer termini from polymerases poised for misincorporation, leading to expulsion of incorrect nucleotides. If misincorporation occurs, enhanced primer dissociation from polymerase domains may improve proofreading in cis by an intrinsic exonuclease or in trans by alternate cellular proofreading activities. Together, these studies reveal that natural selection can readily restore replication error rates to sustainable levels following an adaptive mutator phenotype.     

The proofreading 3'-->5' exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases: a kinetic barrier to translesion DNA synthesis

The 3'-->5' exonuclease activity intrinsic to several DNA polymerases plays a primary role in genetic stability; it acts as a first line of defense in correcting DNA polymerase errors. A mismatched basepair at the primer terminus is the preferred substrate for the exonuclease activity over a correct basepair. The efficiency of the exonuclease as a proofreading activity for mispairs containing a DNA lesion varies, however, being dependent upon both the DNA polymerase/exonuclease and the type of DNA lesion. The exonuclease activities intrinsic to the T4 polymerase (family B) and DNA polymerase gamma (family A) proofread DNA mispairs opposite endogenous DNA lesions, including alkylation, oxidation, and abasic adducts. However, the exonuclease of the Klenow polymerase cannot discriminate between correct and incorrect bases opposite alkylation and oxidative lesions. DNA damage alters the dynamics of the intramolecular partitioning of DNA substrates between the 3'-->5' exonuclease and polymerase activities. Enzymatic idling at lesions occurs when an exonuclease activity efficiently removes the same base that is preferentially incorporated by the DNA polymerase activity. Thus, the exonuclease activity can also act as a kinetic barrier to translesion synthesis (TLS) by preventing the stable incorporation of bases opposite DNA lesions. Understanding the downstream consequences of exonuclease activity at DNA lesions is necessary for elucidating the mechanisms of translesion synthesis and damage-induced cytotoxicity.     

The proofreading 3′→5′ exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases: a kinetic barrier to translesion DNA synthesis

The 3′→5′ exonuclease activity intrinsic to several DNA polymerases plays a primary role in genetic stability; it acts as a first line of defense in correcting DNA polymerase errors. A mismatched basepair at the primer terminus is the preferred substrate for the exonuclease activity over a correct basepair. The efficiency of the exonuclease as a proofreading activity for mispairs containing a DNA lesion varies, however, being dependent upon both the DNA polymerase/exonuclease and the type of DNA lesion. The exonuclease activities intrinsic to the T4 polymerase (family B) and DNA polymerase γ (family A) proofread DNA mispairs opposite endogenous DNA lesions, including alkylation, oxidation, and abasic adducts. However, the exonuclease of the Klenow polymerase cannot discriminate between correct and incorrect bases opposite alkylation and oxidative lesions. DNA damage alters the dynamics of the intramolecular partitioning of DNA substrates between the 3′→5′ exonuclease and polymerase activities. Enzymatic idling at lesions occurs when an exonuclease activity efficiently removes the same base that is preferentially incorporated by the DNA polymerase activity. Thus, the exonuclease activity can also act as a kinetic barrier to translesion synthesis (TLS) by preventing the stable incorporation of bases opposite DNA lesions. Understanding the downstream consequences of exonuclease activity at DNA lesions is necessary for elucidating the mechanisms of translesion synthesis and damage-induced cytotoxicity.     

Substrate specificity and proposed structure of the proofreading complex of T7 DNA polymerase

Faithful replication of genomic DNA by high-fidelity DNA polymerases is crucial for the survival of most living organisms. While high-fidelity DNA polymerases favor canonical base pairs over mismatches by a factor of ∼1 × 10⁵, fidelity is further enhanced several orders of magnitude by a 3′–5′ proofreading exonuclease that selectively removes mispaired bases in the primer strand. Despite the importance of proofreading to maintaining genome stability, it remains much less studied than the fidelity mechanisms employed at the polymerase active site. Here we characterize the substrate specificity for the proofreading exonuclease of a high-fidelity DNA polymerase by investigating the proofreading kinetics on various DNA substrates. The contribution of the exonuclease to net fidelity is a function of the kinetic partitioning between extension and excision. We show that while proofreading of a terminal mismatch is efficient, proofreading a mismatch buried by one or two correct bases is even more efficient. Because the polymerase stalls after incorporation of a mismatch and after incorporation of one or two correct bases on top of a mismatch, the net contribution of the exonuclease is a function of multiple opportunities to correct mistakes. We also characterize the exonuclease stereospecificity using phosphorothioate-modified DNA, provide a homology model for the DNA primer strand in the exonuclease active site, and propose a dynamic structural model for the transfer of DNA from the polymerase to the exonuclease active site based on MD simulations.     

On the fidelity of DNA replication: herpes DNA polymerase and its associated exonuclease.

Procaryotic DNA polymerases contain an associated 3'----5' exonuclease activity which provides a proofreading function and contributes substantially to replication fidelity. DNA polymerases of the eucaryotic herpes-type viruses contain similar associated exonuclease activities. We have investigated the fidelity of polymerases purified from wild type herpes simplex virus, as well as from mutator and antimutator strains. On synthetic templates, the herpes enzymes show greater relative exonuclease activities, and greater ability to excise a terminal mismatched base, than procaryotic DNA polymerases which proofread. On a phi X174 natural DNA template, the herpes enzymes are more accurate than purified eucaryotic DNA polymerases; the error rate is similar to E. coli polymerase I. However, conditions which abnegate proofreading by E. coli polymerase I have little effect on the herpes enzymes. We conclude that either these viral polymerases are accurate in the absence of proofreading, or the conditions examined have little effect on proofreading by the herpes DNA polymerases.     

Functional Importance of Bacteriophage ?29 DNA Polymerase Residue Tyr148 in Primer-terminus Stabilisation at the 3′-5′ Exonuclease Active Site

Recent crystallographic resolution of ?29 DNA polymerase complexes with ssDNA at its 3′-5′ exonuclease active site has allowed the identification of residues Pro129 and Tyr148 as putative ssDNA ligands, the latter being conserved in the Kx₂h motif of proofreading family B DNA polymerases. Single substitution of ?29 DNA polymerase residue Tyr148 to Ala rendered an enzyme with a reduced capacity to stabilize the binding of the primer terminus at the 3′-5′ exonuclease active site, not having a direct role in the catalysis of the reaction. Analysis of the 3′-5′ exonuclease on primer/template structures showed a critical role for residue Tyr148 in the proofreading of DNA polymerisation errors. In addition, Tyr148 is not involved in coupling polymerisation to strand displacement in contrast to the catalytic residues responsible for the exonuclease reaction, its role being restricted to stabilisation of the frayed 3′ terminus at the exonuclease active site. Altogether, the results lead us to extend the consensus sequence of the above motif of proofreading family B DNA polymerases into Kx₂hxA. The different solutions adopted by proofreading DNA polymerases to stack the 3′ terminus at the exonuclease site are discussed. In addition, the results obtained with mutants at ?29 DNA polymerase residue Pro129 allow us to rule out a functional role as ssDNA ligand for this residue.     

The fidelity of DNA synthesis by the catalytic subunit of yeast DNA polymerase alpha alone and with accessory proteins

The fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by the 180-kDa catalytic subunit (p180) of DNA polymerase alpha from Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been determined. Despite the presence of a 3'----5' exonuclease activity (Brooke et al., 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 3005-3015), its accuracy is similar to several exonuclease-deficient DNA polymerases and much lower than other DNA polymerases that have associated exonucleolytic proofreading activity. Average error rates are 1/9900 and 1/12,000, respectively, for single base-substitution and minus-one nucleotide frameshift errors; the polymerase generates deletions as well. Similar error rates are observed with reactions containing the 180-kDa subunit plus an 86-kDa subunit (p86), or with these two polypeptides plus two additional subunits (p58 and p49) comprising the DNA primase activity required for DNA replication. Finally, addition of yeast replication factor-A (RF-A), a protein preparation that stimulates DNA synthesis and has single-stranded DNA-binding activity, yields a polymerization reaction with 7 polypeptides required for replication, yet fidelity remains low relative to error rates for semiconservative replication. The data suggest that neither exonucleolytic proofreading activity, the beta subunit, the DNA primase subunits nor RF-A contributes substantially to base substitution or frameshift error discrimination by the DNA polymerase alpha catalytic subunit.     

Single-base discrimination mediated by proofreading 3′ phosphorothioate-modified primers

It has been well known for decades that deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) polymerases with proofreading function have a higher fidelity in primer extension as compared to those without 3′ exonuclease activities. However, polymerases with proofreading function have not been used in single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assays. Here, we describe a new method for single-base discrimination by proofreading the 3′ phosphorothioate-modified primers using a polymerase with proofreading function. Our data show that the combination of a polymerase with 3′ exonuclease activity and the 3′ phosphorothioate-modified primers work efficiently as a single-base mismatch-operated on/off switch. DNA polymerization only occurred from matched primers, whereas mismatched primers were not extended at the broad range of annealing temperature tested in our study. This novel single-base discrimination method has potential in SNP assays.     

The high fidelity and unique error signature of human DNA polymerase epsilon

Bulk replicative DNA synthesis in eukaryotes is highly accurate and efficient, primarily because of two DNA polymerases (Pols): Pols δ and ε. The high fidelity of these enzymes is due to their intrinsic base selectivity and proofreading exonuclease activity which, when coupled with post-replication mismatch repair, helps to maintain human mutation rates at less than one mutation per genome duplication. Conditions that reduce polymerase fidelity result in increased mutagenesis and can lead to cancer in mice. Whereas yeast Pol ε has been well characterized, human Pol ε remains poorly understood. Here, we present the first report on the fidelity of human Pol ε. We find that human Pol ε carries out DNA synthesis with high fidelity, even in the absence of its 3'→5' exonucleolytic proofreading and is significantly more accurate than yeast Pol ε. Though its spectrum of errors is similar to that of yeast Pol ε, there are several notable exceptions. These include a preference of the human enzyme for T→A over A→T transversions. As compared with other replicative DNA polymerases, human Pol ε is particularly accurate when copying homonucleotide runs of 4-5 bases. The base pair substitution specificity and high fidelity for frameshift errors observed for human Pol ε are distinct from the errors made by human Pol δ.     

A method to select for mutator DNA polymerase deltas in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Proofreading DNA polymerases share common short peptide motifs that bind Mg(2+) in the exonuclease active center; however, hydrolysis rates are not the same for all of the enzymes, which indicates that there are functional and likely structural differences outside of the conserved residues. Since structural information is available for only a few proofreading DNA polymerases, we developed a genetic selection method to identify mutant alleles of the POL3 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which encode DNA polymerase delta mutants that replicate DNA with reduced fidelity. The selection procedure is based on genetic methods used to identify "mutator" DNA polymerases in bacteriophage T4. New yeast DNA polymerase delta mutants were identified, but some mutants expected from studies of the phage T4 DNA polymerase were not detected. This would indicate that there may be important differences in the proofreading pathways catalyzed by the two DNA polymerases.     

The fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by derivatives of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I

The fidelity of DNA synthesis by an exonuclease-proficient DNA polymerase results from the selectivity of the polymerization reaction and from exonucleolytic proofreading. We have examined the contribution of these two steps to the fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by the large Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, using enzymes engineered by site-directed mutagenesis to inactivate the proofreading exonuclease. Measurements with two mutant Klenow polymerases lacking exonuclease activity but retaining normal polymerase activity and protein structure demonstrate that the base substitution fidelity of polymerization averages one error for each 10,000 to 40,000 bases polymerized, and can vary more than 30-fold depending on the mispair and its position. Steady-state enzyme kinetic measurements of selectivity at the initial insertion step by the exonuclease-deficient polymerase demonstrate differences in both the Km and the Vmax for incorrect versus correct nucleotides. Exonucleolytic proofreading by the wild-type enzyme improves the average base substitution fidelity by 4- to 7-fold, reflecting efficient proofreading of some mispairs and less efficient proofreading of others. The wild-type polymerase is highly accurate for -1 base frameshift errors, with an error rate of less than or equal to 10(-6). The exonuclease-deficient polymerase is less accurate, suggesting that proofreading also enhances frameshift fidelity. Even without a proofreading exonuclease, Klenow polymerase has high frameshift fidelity relative to several other DNA polymerases, including eucaryotic DNA polymerase-alpha, an exonuclease-deficient, 4-subunit complex whose catalytic subunit is almost three times larger. The Klenow polymerase has a large (46 kDa) domain containing the polymerase active site and a smaller (22 kDa) domain containing the active site for the 3'----5' exonuclease. Upon removal of the small domain, the large polymerase domain has altered base substitution error specificity when compared to the two-domain but exonuclease-deficient enzyme. It is also less accurate for -1 base errors at reiterated template nucleotides and for a 276-nucleotide deletion error. Thus, removal of a protein domain of a DNA polymerase can affect its fidelity.     

Single-base discrimination mediated by proofreading 3' phosphorothioate-modified primers

It has been well known for decades that deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) polymerases with proofreading function have a higher fidelity in primer extension as compared to those without 3' exonuclease activities. However, polymerases with proofreading function have not been used in single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assays. Here, we describe a new method for single-base discrimination by proofreading the 3' phosphorothioate-modified primers using a polymerase with proofreading function. Our data show that the combination of a polymerase with 3' exonuclease activity and the 3' phosphorothioate-modified primers work efficiently as a single-base mismatch-operated on/off switch. DNA polymerization only occurred from matched primers, whereas mismatched primers were not extended at the broad range of annealing temperature tested in our study. This novel single-base discrimination method has potential in SNP assays.     

Primer-terminus stabilization at the 3'-5' exonuclease active site of phi29 DNA polymerase. Involvement of two amino acid residues highly conserved in proofreading DNA polymerases.

By site-directed mutagenesis in phi29 DNA polymerase, we have analyzed the functional importance of two evolutionarily conserved residues belonging to the 3'-5' exonuclease domain of DNA-dependent DNA polymerases. In Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, these residues are Thr358 and Asn420, shown by crystallographic analysis to be directly acting as single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) ligands at the 3'-5' exonuclease active site. On the basis of these structural data, single substitution of the corresponding residues of phi29 DNA polymerase, Thr15 and Asn62, produced enzymes with a very reduced or altered capacity to bind ssDNA. Analysis of the residual 3'-5' exonuclease activity of these mutant derivatives on ssDNA substrates allowed us to conclude that these two residues do not play a direct role in the catalysis of the reaction. On the other hand, analysis of the 3'-5' exonuclease activity on either matched or mismatched primer/template structures showed a critical role of these two highly conserved residues in exonucleolysis under polymerization conditions, i.e. in the proofreading of DNA polymerization errors, an evolutionary advantage of most DNA-dependent DNA polymerases. Moreover, in contrast to the dual role in 3'-5' exonucleolysis and strand displacement previously observed for phi29 DNA polymerase residues acting as metal ligands, the contribution of residues Thr15 and Asn62 appears to be restricted to the proofreading function, by stabilization of the frayed primer-terminus at the 3'-5' exonuclease active site.     

Characterization of Family D DNA polymerase from Thermococcus sp. 9°N

Accurate DNA replication is essential for maintenance of every genome. All archaeal genomes except Crenarchaea, encode for a member of Family B (polB) and Family D (polD) DNA polymerases. Gene deletion studies in Thermococcus kodakaraensis and Methanococcus maripaludis show that polD is the only essential DNA polymerase in these organisms. Thus, polD may be the primary replicative DNA polymerase for both leading and lagging strand synthesis. To understand this unique archaeal enzyme, we report the biochemical characterization of a heterodimeric polD from Thermococcus. PolD contains both DNA polymerase and proofreading 3′–5′ exonuclease activities to ensure efficient and accurate genome duplication. The polD incorporation fidelity was determined for the first time. Despite containing 3′–5′ exonuclease proofreading activity, polD has a relatively high error rate (95 × 10^?5) compared to polB (19 × 10^?5) and at least 10-fold higher than the polB DNA polymerases from yeast (polε and polδ) or Escherichia coli DNA polIII holoenzyme. The implications of polD fidelity and biochemical properties in leading and lagging strand synthesis are discussed.     

Hydrolysis of 3'-terminal mispairs in vitro by the 3'----5' exonuclease of DNA polymerase delta permits subsequent extension by DNA polymerase alpha

Purified DNA polymerase alpha, the major replicating enzyme found in mammalian cells, lacks an associated 3'----5' proofreading exonuclease that, in bacteria, contributes significantly to the accuracy of DNA replication. Calf thymus DNA polymerase alpha cannot remove mispaired 3'-termini, nor can it extend them efficiently. We designed a biochemical assay to search in cell extracts for a putative proofreading exonuclease that might function in concert with DNA polymerase alpha in vivo but dissociates from it during purification. Using this assay, we purified a 3'----5' exonuclease from calf thymus that preferentially hydrolyzes mispaired 3'-termini, permitting subsequent extension of the correctly paired 3'-terminus by DNA polymerase alpha. This exonuclease copurifies with a DNA polymerase activity that is biochemically distinct from DNA polymerase alpha and exhibits characteristics described for a second replicative DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase delta. In related studies, we showed that the 3'----5' exonuclease of authentic DNA polymerase delta, like the purified exonuclease, removes terminal mispairs, allowing extension by DNA polymerase alpha. These data suggest that a single proofreading exonuclease could be shared by DNA polymerases alpha and delta, functioning at the site of DNA replication in mammalian cells.     

Autonomous 3'-->5' exonucleases can proofread for DNA polymerase beta from rat liver

Autonomous 3'-->5'exonucleases are not bound covalently to DNA polymerases but are often involved in replicative complexes. Such exonucleases from rat liver, calf thymus and Escherichia coli (molecular masses of 28+/-2 kDa) are shown to increase more than 10-fold the accuracy of DNA polymerase beta (the most inaccurate mammalian polymerase) from rat liver in the course of reduplication of the primed DNA of bacteriophage phiX174 amber 3 in vitro. The extent of correction increases together with the rise in 3'-->5' exonuclease concentration. Extrapolation of the in vitro DNA replication fidelity to the cellular levels of rat exonuclease and beta-polymerase suggests that exonucleolytic proofreading could augment the accuracy of DNA synthesis by two orders of magnitude. These results are not explained by exonucleolytic degradation of the primers ("no synthesis-no errors"), since similar data are obtained with the use of the primers 15 or 150 nucleotides long in the course of a fidelity assay of DNA polymerases, both alpha and beta, in the presence of various concentrations of 3'-->5' exonuclease.     

Dissecting and tuning primer editing by proofreading polymerases

Proofreading polymerases have 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity that allows the excision and correction of mis-incorporated bases during DNA replication. In a previous study, we demonstrated that in addition to correcting substitution errors and lowering the error rate of DNA amplification, proofreading polymerases can also edit PCR primers to match template sequences. Primer editing is a feature that can be advantageous in certain experimental contexts, such as amplicon-based microbiome profiling. Here we develop a set of synthetic DNA standards to report on primer editing activity and use these standards to dissect this phenomenon. The primer editing standards allow next-generation sequencing-based enzymological measurements, reveal the extent of editing, and allow the comparison of different polymerases and cycling conditions. We demonstrate that proofreading polymerases edit PCR primers in a concentration-dependent manner, and we examine whether primer editing exhibits any sequence specificity. In addition, we use these standards to show that primer editing is tunable through the incorporation of phosphorothioate linkages. Finally, we demonstrate the ability of primer editing to robustly rescue the drop-out of taxa with 16S rRNA gene-targeting primer mismatches using mock communities and human skin microbiome samples.     

Proofreading exonuclease activity of human DNA polymerase δ and its effects on lesion-bypass DNA synthesis

Replicative DNA polymerases possess 3′ → 5′ exonuclease activity to reduce misincorporation of incorrect nucleotides by proofreading during replication. To examine if this proofreading activity modulates DNA synthesis of damaged templates, we constructed a series of recombinant human DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) in which one or two of the three conserved Asp residues in the exonuclease domain are mutated, and compared their properties with that of the wild-type enzyme. While all the mutant enzymes lost more than 95% exonuclease activity and severely decreased the proofreading activity than the wild-type, the bypass efficiency of damaged templates was varied: two mutant enzymes, D515V and D402A/D515A, gave higher bypass efficiencies on templates containing an abasic site, but another mutant, D316N/D515A, showed a lower bypass efficiency than the wild-type. All the enzymes including the wild-type inserted an adenine opposite the abasic site, whereas these enzymes inserted cytosine and adenine opposite an 8-oxoguanine with a ratio of 6:4. These results indicate that the exonuclease activity of human Pol δ modulates its intrinsic bypass efficiency on the damaged template, but does not affect the choice of nucleotide to be inserted.