End-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Drosophila melanogaster is largely DNA ligase IV independent

Repair of DNA double-strand breaks can occur by either nonhomologous end joining or homologous recombination. Most nonhomologous end joining requires a specialized ligase, DNA ligase IV (Lig4). In Drosophila melanogaster, double-strand breaks created by excision of a P element are usually repaired by a homologous recombination pathway called synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA). SDSA requires strand invasion mediated by DmRad51, the product of the spn-A gene. In spn-A mutants, repair proceeds through a nonconservative pathway involving the annealing of microhomologies found within the 17-nt overhangs produced by P excision. We report here that end joining of P-element breaks in the absence of DmRad51 does not require Drosophila LIG4. In wild-type flies, SDSA is sometimes incomplete, and repair is finished by an end-joining pathway that also appears to be independent of LIG4. Loss of LIG4 does not increase sensitivity to ionizing radiation in late-stage larvae, but lig4 spn-A double mutants do show heightened sensitivity relative to spn-A single mutants. Together, our results suggest that a LIG4-independent end-joining pathway is responsible for the majority of double-strand break repair in the absence of homologous recombination in flies.     

The Drosophila melanogaster DmRAD54 Gene Plays a Crucial Role in Double-Strand Break Repair after P-Element Excision and Acts Synergistically with Ku70 in the Repair of X-Ray Damage

The RAD54 gene has an essential role in the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) via homologous recombination in yeast as well as in higher eukaryotes. A Drosophila melanogaster strain deficient in the RAD54 homolog DmRAD54 is characterized by increased X-ray and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) sensitivity. In addition, DmRAD54 is involved in the repair of DNA interstrand cross-links, as is shown here. However, whereas X-ray-induced loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) events were completely absent in DmRAD54(-/-) flies, treatment with cross-linking agents or MMS resulted in only a slight reduction in LOH events in comparison with those in wild-type flies. To investigate the relative contributions of recombinational repair and nonhomologous end joining in DSB repair, a DmRad54(-/-)/DmKu70(-/-) double mutant was generated. Compared with both single mutants, a strong synergistic increase in X-ray sensitivity was observed in the double mutant. No similar increase in sensitivity was seen after treatment with MMS. Apparently, the two DSB repair pathways overlap much less in the repair of MMS-induced lesions than in that of X-ray-induced lesions. Excision of P transposable elements in Drosophila involves the formation of site-specific DSBs. In the absence of the DmRAD54 gene product, no male flies could be recovered after the excision of a single P element and the survival of females was reduced to 10% compared to that of wild-type flies. P-element excision involves the formation of two DSBs which have identical 3' overhangs of 17 nucleotides. The crucial role of homologous recombination in the repair of these DSBs may be related to the very specific nature of the breaks.     

Securing genome stability by orchestrating DNA repair: removal of radiation-induced clustered lesions in DNA

In addition to double- and single-strand DNA breaks and isolated base modifications, ionizing radiation induces clustered DNA damage, which contains two or more lesions closely spaced within about two helical turns on opposite DNA strands. Post-irradiation repair of single-base lesions is routinely performed by base excision repair and a DNA strand break is involved as an intermediate. Simultaneous processing of lesions on opposite DNA strands may generate double-strand DNA breaks and enhance nonhomologous end joining, which frequently results in the formation of deletions. Recent studies support the possibility that the mechanism of base excision repair contributes to genome stability by diminishing the formation of double-strand DNA breaks during processing of clustered lesions.     

Germline excision of the transposable element Tc1 in C. elegans.

We have examined eight germline revertants generated by the excision of Tc1 from a site within the unc-22 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans. A rich variety of rearrangements accompanied Tc1 excision at this site, including transposon 'footprints', deletions of sequences flanking the insertion site and direct nontandem duplications of flanking DNA. With only modest modification the double-strand gap repair model for transposition, recently proposed by Engles and coworkers (Cell 62: 515-525 1990), can explain even the most complex of these rearrangements. In light of this model rearrangements of the target site accompanying transposition/excision may not be the end result of imprecise excision of the element. Instead, these rearrangements may be the result of imprecise repair of the double-strand gap by the host replication and repair machinery. Sequences surrounding an insertion site influence the fidelity of gap repair by this machinery. This may lead to a number of possible resolutions of a double-strand gap as documented here for a Tc1 site in unc-22.     

End-joining of blunt DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian fibroblasts is precise and requires DNA-PK and XRCC4

DNA double-strand break repair by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is generally considered to be an imprecise repair pathway. In order to study repair of a blunt, 5' phosphorylated break in the DNA of mammalian fibroblasts, we used the E. coli cut-and-paste type transposon Tn5. We found that the Tn5 transposase can mediate transposon excision in Chinese hamster cell lines. Interestingly, a blunt 5' phosphorylated break could efficiently be repaired without loss of nucleotides in wild type fibroblasts. Catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK(CS)) deficiency reduced the efficiency of joining four-fold without reducing precision, whereas both efficiency and accuracy of joining were affected in Ku80 or XRCC4 mutant cell lines. These results show that both the DNA-PK and the XRCC4/ligase IV complexes are required for NHEJ and that other, more error-prone, repair processes cannot efficiently substitute for joining of blunt breaks produced in living cells. Interestingly, the severity of the end-joining defect differs between the various mutants, which may explain the difference in the severity of the phenotypes, which have been observed in the corresponding mouse models.     

Breadth by depth: expanding our understanding of the repair of transposon-induced DNA double strand breaks via deep-sequencing

The transposases of DNA transposable elements catalyze the excision of the element from the host genome, but are not involved in the repair of the resulting double-strand break. To elucidate the role of various host DNA repair and damage response proteins in the repair of the hairpin-ended double strand breaks (DSBs) generated during excision of the maize Ac element in Arabidopsis thaliana, we deep-sequenced hundreds of thousands of somatic excision products from a variety of repair- or response-defective mutants. We find that each of these repair/response defects negatively affects the preservation of the ends, resulting in an enhanced frequency of deletions, insertions, and inversions at the excision site. The spectra of the resulting repair products demonstrate, not unexpectedly, that the canonical nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) proteins DNA ligase IV and KU70 play an important role in the repair of the lesion generated by Ac excision. Our data also indicate that auxiliary NHEJ repair proteins such as DNA ligase VI and DNA polymerase lambda are routinely involved in the repair of these lesions. Roles for the damage response kinases ATM and ATR in the repair of transposition-induced DSBs are also discussed.     

Lig4 and rad54 are required for repair of DNA double-strand breaks induced by P-element excision in Drosophila

Site-specific double-strand breaks (DSBs) were generated in the white gene located on the X chromosome of Drosophila by excision of the w(hd) P-element. To investigate the role of nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) in the repair of these breaks, the w(hd) P-element was mobilized in flies carrying mutant alleles of either lig4 or rad54. The survival of both lig4- and rad54-deficient males was reduced to 25% in comparison to the wild type, indicating that both NHEJ and HR are involved in the repair P-induced gaps in males. Survival of lig4-deficient females was not affected at all, implying that HR using the homologous chromosome as a template can partially compensate for the impaired NHEJ pathway. In rad54 mutant females survival was reduced to 70% after w(hd) excision. PCR analysis indicated that the undamaged homologous chromosome may compensate for the potential loss of the broken chromosome in rad54 mutant females after excision. Molecular analysis of the repair junctions revealed microhomology (2-8 bp)-dependent DSB repair in most products. In the absence of Lig4, the 8-bp target site duplication is used more frequently for repair. Our data indicate the presence of efficient alternative end-joining mechanisms, which partly depend on the presence of microhomology but do not require Lig4.     

P element excision and repair by non-homologous end joining occurs in both G1 and G2 of the cell cycle

P element excision generates a DNA double-strand break at the transposon donor site. Genetic studies have demonstrated a strong bias toward repair of P element-induced DNA breaks by homologous recombination with the sister chromatid, suggesting that P element excision occurs after DNA replication, in G2 of the cell cycle. We developed methods to arrest Drosophila tissue culture cells and assay P element excision in either G1- or G2-arrested cells. Dacapo or tribbles transgene expression arrests cells in either G2 or G2, respectively. RNA-mediated gene interference (RNAi) directed against cyclin E or cyclin A arrests cells in G1 or G2, respectively. P element excision occurs efficiently in both G1- and G2-arrested cells, suggesting that cell cycle regulation of P element transposase does not occur in our somatic cell system. DNA double-strand break repair occurs by two predominant mechanisms: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). HR is thought to be restricted to the post-replicative, G2, phase of the cell cycle, while NHEJ may occur throughout the cell cycle. Our results indicate that NHEJ repair of an extrachromasomal plasmid substrate occurs at least as efficiently in G2-arrested cells as in asynchronous cells or in G1-arrested cells.     

Dual Roles for DNA Polymerase Theta in Alternative End-Joining Repair of Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila

DNA double-strand breaks are repaired by multiple mechanisms that are roughly grouped into the categories of homology-directed repair and non-homologous end joining. End-joining repair can be further classified as either classical non-homologous end joining, which requires DNA ligase 4, or “alternative” end joining, which does not. Alternative end joining has been associated with genomic deletions and translocations, but its molecular mechanism(s) are largely uncharacterized. Here, we report that Drosophila melanogaster DNA polymerase theta (pol theta), encoded by the mus308 gene and previously implicated in DNA interstrand crosslink repair, plays a crucial role in DNA ligase 4-independent alternative end joining. In the absence of pol theta, end joining is impaired and residual repair often creates large deletions flanking the break site. Analysis of break repair junctions from flies with mus308 separation-of-function alleles suggests that pol theta promotes the use of long microhomologies during alternative end joining and increases the likelihood of complex insertion events. Our results establish pol theta as a key protein in alternative end joining in Drosophila and suggest a potential mechanistic link between alternative end joining and interstrand crosslink repair.     

Evidence for multiple cycles of strand invasion during repair of double-strand gaps in Drosophila

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), a major source of genome instability, are often repaired through homologous recombination pathways. Models for these pathways have been proposed, but the precise mechanisms and the rules governing their use remain unclear. In Drosophila, the synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) model can explain most DSB repair. To investigate SDSA, we induced DSBs by excision of a P element from the male X chromosome, which produces a 14-kb gap relative to the sister chromatid. In wild-type males, repair synthesis tracts are usually long, resulting in frequent restoration of the P element. However, repair synthesis is often incomplete, resulting in internally deleted P elements. We examined the effects of mutations in spn-A, which encodes the Drosophila Rad51 ortholog. As expected, there is little or no repair synthesis in homozygous spn-A mutants after P excision. However, heterozygosity for spn-A mutations also resulted in dramatic reductions in the lengths of repair synthesis tracts. These findings support a model in which repair DNA synthesis is not highly processive. We discuss a model wherein repair of a double-strand gap requires multiple cycles of strand invasion, synthesis, and dissociation of the nascent strand. After dissociation, the nascent strand may anneal to a complementary single strand, reinvade a template to be extended by additional synthesis, or undergo end joining. This model can explain aborted SDSA repair events and the prevalence of internally deleted transposable elements in genomes.     

The effect of heterologous insertions on gene conversion in mitotically dividing cells in Drosophila melanogaster

We examined the influence that heterologous sequences of different sizes have on the frequency of double-strand-break repair by gene conversion in Drosophila melanogaster. We induced a double-strand break on one X chromosome in female flies by P-element excision. These flies contained heterologous insertions of various sizes located 238 bp from the break site in cis or in trans to the break, or both. We observed a significant decrease in double-strand-break repair with large heterologous insertions located either in cis or in trans to the break. Reestablishing the homology by including the same heterologous sequence in cis and in trans to the double-strand break restored the frequency of gene conversion to wild-type levels. In one instance, an allelic nonhomologous insertion completely abolished repair by homologous recombination. The results show that the repair of a double-strand break by gene conversion requires chromosome pairing in the local region of the double-strand break.     

Removal of the Bloom Syndrome DNA Helicase Extends the Utility of Imprecise Transposon Excision for Making Null Mutations in Drosophila

Transposable elements are frequently used in Drosophila melanogaster for imprecise excision screens to delete genes of interest. However, these screens are highly variable in the number and size of deletions that are recovered. Here, we show that conducting excision screens in mus309 mutant flies that lack DmBlm, the Drosophila ortholog of the Bloom syndrome protein, increases the percentage and overall size of flanking deletions recovered after excision of either P or Minos elements.TRANSPOSABLE elements have a rich history as mutagenesis tools in Drosophila melanogaster (reviewed in Ryder and Russell 2003). Initially, researchers focused their efforts on the use of nonautonomous P-element transposons for gene disruption (Cooley et al. 1988). However, P elements have insertion biases, preferring to transpose into euchromatic regions, the 5′ regions of genes (Tsubota et al. 1985; Kelley et al. 1987), and to target sequence motifs similar to the octamer GGCCAGAC (O''Hare and Rubin 1983). These biases make it unlikely that full genome saturation will be reached using P-element mutagenesis. Therefore, mutational systems that utilize transposable elements with different insertion biases have been developed. These include Hobo (Smith et al. 1993); the lepidopteran-derived piggyBac element, which inserts at TTAA sites (Hacker et al. 2003; Horn et al. 2003); and Minos, a Tc-1/mariner-like element originally isolated from Drosophila hydei that inserts at TA dinucleotides (Franz and Savakis 1991; Loukeris et al. 1995). Using a combination of these transposons, the Drosophila Gene Disruption Project has generated inserts in ∼60% of the 14,850 annotated genes (Spradling et al. 1999; Bellen et al. 2004).In spite of the growing number of transposon insertions in the Drosophila genome, many are inserted in regions that do not completely abolish gene function, such as 5′-UTRs and introns. This can make it difficult to discern the true null phenotypes of genes. Furthermore, there still exist a sizable number of genes for which no transposon insertions are available. To address these issues, many transposons have been constructed with additional characteristics, such as FRT sites, that make generation of molecularly defined deletions by site-specific recombination relatively straightforward (Parks et al. 2004; Thibault et al. 2004; Ryder et al. 2007). However, until saturation of the genome with these designer transposons is achieved, their utility in creating single-gene deletions remains limited.A more general approach for generating single-gene deletions that has proven successful is the use of P elements in imprecise excision screens. Excision of a P element creates a DNA double-strand break with 17 nucleotide noncomplementary ends (Beall and Rio 1997). If the ends of the break are degraded prior to repair, a deletion of DNA flanking the original insertion site is created (reviewed in Hummel and Klambt 2008). On average, the frequency of flanking deletions recovered from imprecise excision screens is ∼1%. However, this frequency varies tremendously by locus and depends on a multitude of factors that are not well understood, including chromatin structure and local sequence context. Therefore, generation of suitable deletion mutants frequently involves screening many hundreds of independent lines.An alternative method that uses P elements to generate deletions involves screening for events associated with male recombination. These events, which probably arise through a hybrid element insertion mechanism, generate one-sided deletions of sizes ranging from several base pairs to several kilobases (Preston and Engels 1996). This method, although powerful, involves screening a large number of flies and requires two sequential screens to generate bidirectional deletions.P-element-induced double-strand breaks are preferentially repaired through homologous recombination using a sister chromatid or a homologous chromosome as a template (Engels et al. 1990). Previously, we and others have demonstrated that the Drosophila Bloom protein ortholog (DmBlm), a RecQ DNA helicase encoded by mus309, is involved in homology-directed repair of these breaks (Beall and Rio 1996; McVey et al. 2004a). In the absence of DmBlm, repair of a P-element-induced break on a plasmid or at a chromosomal locus frequently results in a large, flanking deletion. Several groups have applied this observation to imprecise excision screens using P elements and have successfully recovered multiple deletions (Astrom et al. 2003; Johansson et al. 2007; Y. Rong, unpublished data). However, a direct comparison between imprecise excision screens carried out in wild-type vs. mus309 mutant backgrounds has not been published, and little is known regarding the use of this technique with other types of transposable elements. In this study, we used three different transposons to test the hypothesis that the use of a mus309 mutant background in imprecise excision screens would result in a greater yield of deletions and that these deletions would be larger than those recovered from a wild-type background.

The mus309 mutant background increases the frequency and size of flanking deletions following P-element excision:

Previously, we have shown that repair of a double-strand break created by excision of the P{w^a} transposon, located at 13F1–13F4 on the X chromosome, is deletion prone in the absence of DmBlm (McVey et al. 2004a). This is likely due to a requirement for DmBlm in D-loop unwinding during homologous recombination (Bachrati et al. 2006; Weinert and Rio 2007). We have speculated that an unknown endonuclease may cleave D-loops in the absence of DmBlm, resulting in deletions flanking the P-element insertion site. To determine whether these observations can be generalized to imprecise excision screens, we tested two additional P-element insertions. One of these, P{EPgy2}Trf4-1^EY14679, is inserted within a 1-kb intron of the Trf4-1 gene on the X chromosome (Figure 1A). The other, P{EPgy2}mus205^EY20083, is inserted in a small intron in the mus205 gene on chromosome 2 (Figure 1B). Both of these EY elements contain wild-type copies of the yellow and white genes (Bellen et al. 2004). Thus, flies possessing EPgy2 elements have a wild-type body color and pigmented eyes. For our excision screens, we generated males containing the P element and a constitutively expressed transposase source, Δ2-3 (Robertson et al. 1988). To test the effect of DmBlm absence, we also conducted the screens in heteroallelic mus309^D2/mus309^N1 mutants (Kusano et al. 2001; McVey et al. 2007).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.—Frequency and size of deletions accompanying imprecise P-element excision is increased in the mus309 mutant background. Crosses to generate males possessing both the P transposase and the desired P element were carried out in bottles containing standard cornmeal-based food at 25°. Excision events occurring in the male premeiotic germlines of flies carrying (A) P{EPgy2}Trf4-1^EY14679 and the P{ry⁺, Δ2-3}99B transposase or (B) P{EPgy2}mus205^EY20083 and the CyO, H{w⁺, Δ2-3} transposase were recovered in male progeny (for Trf4-1^EY14679) or over a deficiency spanning the region (for mus205^EY20083). Only one excision per male germline was analyzed to ensure that all events were independent. Genomic DNA was isolated and subjected to PCR analysis using primers specific to the P inverted repeats or to sequences flanking each P element. A and B show a genomic region with genes represented as boxes, intergenic regions as lines, and P elements as inverted triangles. Deletions were recovered from both wild-type (top panels) and mus309^D2/mus309^N1 mutant males (bottom panels) for Trf4-1^EY14679, while deletions were recovered only from mus309 mutant males for mus205^EY20083. Solid lines represent confirmed deletions, broken lines represent potential deletions, and arrows represent deletions that extend farther than was tested by PCR. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of excisions recovered.First, we determined whether loss of DmBlm affected the fertility of males in which P-element excision was occurring. We found no significant difference in the percentage of wild-type vs. mus309 males that were sterile, as defined by an inability of an individual male to produce more than five adult offspring (

Evidence for Drosophila P element transposase activity in mammalian cells and yeast

Drosophila P element transposase expression is limited to the germline by tissue-specific splicing of one of its three introns. Removal of this intron by mutagenesis in vitro has allowed both P element excision and transposition to be detected in Drosophila somatic tissues. In order to determine if P element transposase can function in other organisms, we have expressed modified P elements either lacking one intron or lacking all three introns in mammalian cells and yeast, respectively. Using an assay for P element excision, we have detected apparent excision events in cultured monkey cells. Furthermore, expression of the complete P element cDNA is lethal to Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells carrying a mutation in the RAD52 gene, indicating that double-stranded DNA breaks are generated, presumably by transposase action.     

In vivo gap repair in Drosophila: a one-way street with many destinations

While it has long been possible to study the process of recombination in yeast and other single-celled organisms, it has been difficult to distinguish between pathways of meiotic and mitotic recombination in multicellular eukaryotes. The experimental system described here bridges the historically separated fields of Genetic Recombination and DNA Repair in Drosophila. It is now feasible to study the repair of unique double-strand breaks induced in the Drosophila genome by the excision of a P-transposable element or by cleavage at an introduced endonuclease recognition sequence. This repair can be studied in both somatic cells and mitotically dividing germ cells. The repair of these breaks occurs mainly by copying sequence from a template located anywhere in the karyoplasm, and occurs in both male and female flies. This system, which was the first of its kind in metazoan organisms, is now being used for gene targeting in Drosophila. This review summarizes results that provide new insights into the process of gap repair in Drosophila and outline some recent experiments that demonstrate the power of the gene targeting technique. BioEssays 20: 317-327, 1998.© 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Molecular mechanisms of the formation of DNA double-strand breaks and induction of genomic rearrangements.

The probability that damage occurs in closely opposed sites on complementary DNA strands increases when DNA is heavily modified with mutagenic agents. Enzymatic excision of the opposite lesions produces DNA double-strand breaks which give rise to genomic rearrangements (deletions, insertions, etc.). Plasmid systems were developed for studying chemical lesions leading to double-strand breaks and the fate of broken plasmid molecules within bacterial cells. Deletions result from the base-pairing of fortuitously located direct repeats flanking the DNA broken ends; as a consequence, the latter are joined, while the DNA fragment between the direct repeats is deleted. Genomic rearrangements arise during the repair of the DNA double-strand breaks, and both events are due to similar repair enzymes which maintain the integrity of the DNA primary structure when conditions are not stressful. A number of genomic rearrangements and point mutations seem to be predetermined by the DNA primary structure.     

P-element-induced interallelic gene conversion of insertions and deletions in Drosophila melanogaster.

We studied the process by which whd, a P-element insertion allele of the Drosophila melanogaster white locus, is replaced by its homolog in the presence of transposase. These events are interpreted as the result of double-strand gap repair following excision of the P transposon in whd. We used a series of alleles derived from whd through P-element mobility as templates for this repair. One group of alleles, referred to collectively as whd-F, carried fragments of the P element that had lost some of the sequences needed in cis for mobility. The other group, whd-D, had lost all of the P insert and had some of the flanking DNA from white deleted. The average replacement frequencies were 43% for whd-F alleles and 7% for the whd-D alleles. Some of the former were converted at frequencies exceeding 50%. Our data suggest that the high conversion frequencies for the whd-F templates can be attributed at least in part to an elevated efficiency of repair of unexpanded gaps that is possibly caused by the closer match between whd-F sequences and the unexpanded gap endpoints. In addition, we found that the gene substitutions were almost exclusively in the direction of whd being replaced by the whd-F or whd-D allele rather than the reverse. The template alleles were usually unaltered in the process. This asymmetry implies that the conversion process is unidirectional and that the P fragments are not good substrates for P-element transposase. Our results help elucidate a highly efficient double-strand gap repair mechanism in D. melanogaster that can also be used for gene replacement procedures involving insertions and deletions. They also help explain the rapid spread of P elements in populations.     

MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings

DNA double-strand breaks are normal consequences of cell division and differentiation and must be repaired faithfully to maintain genome stability. Two mechanistically distinct pathways are known to efficiently repair double-strand breaks: homologous recombination and Ku-dependent non-homologous end joining. Recently, a third, less characterized repair mechanism, named microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), has received increasing attention. MMEJ repairs DNA breaks via the use of substantial microhomology and always results in deletions. Furthermore, it probably contributes to oncogenic chromosome rearrangements and genetic variation in humans. Here, we summarize the genetic attributes of MMEJ from several model systems and discuss the relationship between MMEJ and 'alternative end joining'. We propose a mechanistic model for MMEJ and highlight important questions for future research.     

Unraveling DNA Repair in Human: Molecular Mechanisms and Consequences of Repair Defect

Cellular genomes are vulnerable to an array of DNA-damaging agents, of both endogenous and environmental origin. Such damage occurs at a frequency too high to be compatible with life. As a result cell death and tissue degeneration, aging and cancer are caused. To avoid this and in order for the genome to be reproduced, these damages must be corrected efficiently by DNA repair mechanisms. Eukaryotic cells have multiple mechanisms for the repair of damaged DNA. These repair systems in humans protect the genome by repairing modified bases, DNA adducts, crosslinks and double-strand breaks. The lesions in DNA are eliminated by mechanisms such as direct reversal, base excision and nucleotide excision. The base excision repair eliminates single damaged-base residues by the action of specialized DNA glycosylases and AP endonucleases. Nucleotide excision repair excises damage within oligomers that are 25 to 32 nucleotides long. This repair utilizes many proteins to remove the major UV-induced photoproducts from DNA, as well as other types of modified nucleotides. Different DNA polymerases and ligases are utilized to complete the separate pathways. The double-strand breaks in DNA are repaired by mechanisms that involve DNA protein kinase and recombination proteins. The defect in one of the repair protein results in three rare recessive syndromes: xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, and trichothiodystrophy. This review describes the biochemistry of various repair processes and summarizes the clinical features and molecular mechanisms underlying these disorders.     

Unraveling DNA repair in human: molecular mechanisms and consequences of repair defect.

Cellular genomes are vulnerable to an array of DNA-damaging agents, of both endogenous and environmental origin. Such damage occurs at a frequency too high to be compatible with life. As a result cell death and tissue degeneration, aging and cancer are caused. To avoid this and in order for the genome to be reproduced, these damages must be corrected efficiently by DNA repair mechanisms. Eukaryotic cells have multiple mechanisms for the repair of damaged DNA. These repair systems in humans protect the genome by repairing modified bases, DNA adducts, crosslinks and double-strand breaks. The lesions in DNA are eliminated by mechanisms such as direct reversal, base excision and nucleotide excision. The base excision repair eliminates single damaged-base residues by the action of specialized DNA glycosylases and AP endonucleases. Nucleotide excision repair excises damage within oligomers that are 25 to 32 nucleotides long. This repair utilizes many proteins to remove the major UV-induced photoproducts from DNA, as well as other types of modified nucleotides. Different DNA polymerases and ligases are utilized to complete the separate pathways. The double-strand breaks in DNA are repaired by mechanisms that involve DNA protein kinase and recombination proteins. The defect in one of the repair protein results in three rare recessive syndromes: xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, and trichothiodystrophy. This review describes the biochemistry of various repair processes and summarizes the clinical features and molecular mechanisms underlying these disorders.