ATM activation accompanies histone H2AX phosphorylation in A549 cells upon exposure to tobacco smoke

Background  

In response to DNA damage or structural alterations of chromatin, histone H2AX may be phosphorylated on Ser139 by phosphoinositide 3-kinase related protein kinases (PIKKs) such as ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ATM-and Rad-3 related (ATR) kinase, or by DNA dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs). When DNA damage primarily involves formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), H2AX is preferentially phosphorylated by ATM rather than by the other PIKKs. We have recently reported that brief exposure of human pulmonary adenocarcinoma A549 cells or normal human bronchial epithelial cells (NHBE) to cigarette smoke (CS) induced phosphorylation of H2AX.     

ATM activation and histone H2AX phosphorylation as indicators of DNA damage by DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan and during apoptosis

Damage that engenders DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) activates ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase through its auto- or trans-phosphorylation on Ser1981 and activated ATM is one of the mediators of histone H2AX phosphorylation on Ser139. The present study was designed to explore: (i) whether measurement of ATM activation combined with H2AX phosphorylation provides a more sensitive indicator of DSBs than each of these events alone, and (ii) to reveal possible involvement of ATM activation in H2AX phosphorylation during apoptosis. Activation of ATM and/or H2AX phosphorylation in HL-60 or Jurkat cells treated with topotecan (Tpt) was detected immunocytochemically in relation to cell cycle phase, by multiparameter cytometry. Exposure to Tpt led to concurrent phosphorylation of ATM and H2AX in S-phase cells, whereas G1 cells were unaffected. Immunofluorescence (IF) of the S-phase cells immunostained for ATM-S1981P and gammaH2AX combined was distinctly stronger compared to that of the cells stained for each of these proteins alone. However, because of the relatively high ATM-S1981P IF of G1 cells, the ratio of IF of S to G1 cells, that is, the factor that determines competence of the assay in distinction of cells with DSBs, was 2- to 3-fold lower for ATM-S1981P alone, or for ATM-S1981P and gammaH2AX IF combined, than for gammaH2AX alone. ATM activation concurrent with H2AX phosphorylation, likely triggered by induction of DSBs during DNA fragmentation, occurred during apoptosis. The data suggest that frequency of activated ATM and phosphorylated H2AX molecules, per apoptotic cell, is comparable.     

Histone H2AX Phosphorylation after Cell Irradiation with UV-B: Relationship to Cell Cycle Phase and Induction of Apoptosis

Damage to DNA that engenders double-strand breaks (DSBs) triggers phosphorylation of histone H2AX on Ser-139. Expression of phosphorylated H2AX (_H2AX) can be revealed immunocytochemically; the intensity of ?H2AX immunofluorescence (IF) measured by cytometry was reported to correlate with the frequency of DSBs induced by X-ray radiation or by DNA damaging antitumor drugs. The aim of the present study was to measure expression of ?H2AX following exposure of HeLa and HL-60 cells to a wide range of doses of UV-B light (6.1 J/m²-3.45 kJ/m²) and using multiparameter flow and laser scanning cytometry (LSC) to correlate DNA damage with cell cycle phase and induction of apoptosis. In both cell lines, the highest degree of H2AX phosphorylation induced by UV was seen in S-phase cells, particularly during early portion of S. In cells that did not replicate DNA (G₁, G₂ and M) the degree of H2AX phosphorylation was markedly lower than that in S-phase cells, and was strongly UV dose-dependent. Furthermore, the level of UV-induced γH2AX in G₁, G₂ and M was much higher in HeLa- than in HL-60-cells. Apoptotic cells become apparent >2h after exposure to UV and exhibited nearly an order of magnitude higher intensity of γH2AX IF than that initially induced by UV; predominantly S-phase cells underwent apoptosis. While the suppression of DNA replication aphidicolin prevented the induction of H2AX phosphorylation by UV in most S phase cells, it had no effect on a small cohort of cells that appeared to be entering S-phase, that expressed very high levels of γH2AX. Furthermore, aphidicolin itself induced γH2AX in early-S phase cells. The induction of γH2AX by UV was inhibited, but the incidence of apoptosis increased, by 5 mM caffeine, a known inhibitor of PI-3-related kinases. The data are consistent with the notion that H2AX phosphorylation observed throughout S phase reflects formation of DSBs due to the collision of replication forks with the UV-induced primary DNA lesions. Induction of γH2AX in GG₁, GG₂ and M is likely a response to the primary DSBs generated during UV exposure and/or DNA repair. It is unclear why the latter process was more pronounced in HeLa than in HL-60 cells.     

Chipping away at γ-H2AX foci

The mammalian histone H2AX protein functions as a dosage-dependent genomic caretaker and tumor suppressor. Phosphorylation of H2AX to form γ-H2AX in chromatin around DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) is an early event following induction of these hazardous lesions. For a decade, mechanisms that regulate H2AX phosphorylation have been investigated mainly through two-dimensional immunofluorescence (IF). We recently used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to measure γ-H2AX densities along chromosomal DNA strands broken in G1 phase mouse lymphocytes. Our experiments revealed that (1) γ-H2AX densities in nucleosomes form at high levels near DSBs and at diminishing levels farther and farther away from DNA ends, and (2) ATM regulates H2AX phosphorylation through both MDC1-dependent and MDC1-independent means. Neither of these mechanisms were discovered by previous IF studies due to the inherent limitations of light microscopy. Here, we compare data obtained from parallel γ-H2AX ChIP and three-dimensional IF analyses and discuss the impact of our findings upon molecular mechanisms that regulate H2AX phosphorylation in chromatin around DNA breakage sites.     

Gamma-H2AX expression pattern in non-irradiated neonatal mouse germ cells and after low-dose gamma-radiation: relationships between chromatid breaks and DNA double-strand breaks

The DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered to be the most relevant lesions for the deleterious effects of ionizing radiation exposure. The discovery that the induction of DSBs is rapidly followed by the phosphorylation of H2AX histone at Ser-139, favoring repair protein recruitment or access, opens the possibility for a wide range of research. This phosphorylated histone, named gamma-H2AX, has been shown to form foci in interphase nuclei as well as megabase chromatin domains surrounding the DNA lesion on chromosomes. Using detection of gamma-H2AX on germ cell mitotic chromosomes 2 h after gamma-irradiation, we studied radiation-induced DSBs during the G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle. We show that 1) non-irradiated neonatal germ cells express gamma-H2AX with variable patterns at metaphase, 2) gamma-irradiation induces foci whose number increases in a dose-dependent manner, 3) some foci correspond to visible chromatid breaks or exchanges, 4) sticky chromosomes characterizing cell radiation exposure during mitosis are a consequence of DSBs, and 5) gamma-H2AX remains localized at the sites of the lesions even after end-joining has taken place. This suggests that completion of DSB repair does not necessarily imply disappearance of gamma-H2AX.     

Dual effect of heat shock on DNA replication and genome integrity

Heat shock (HS) is one of the better-studied exogenous stress factors. However, little is known about its effects on DNA integrity and the DNA replication process. In this study, we show that in G1 and G2 cells, HS induces a countable number of double-stranded breaks (DSBs) in the DNA that are marked by γH2AX. In contrast, in S-phase cells, HS does not induce DSBs but instead causes an arrest or deceleration of the progression of the replication forks in a temperature-dependent manner. This response also provoked phosphorylation of H2AX, which appeared at the sites of replication. Moreover, the phosphorylation of H2AX at or close to the replication fork rescued the fork from total collapse. Collectively our data suggest that in an asynchronous cell culture, HS might affect DNA integrity both directly and via arrest of replication fork progression and that the phosphorylation of H2AX has a protective effect on the arrested replication forks in addition to its known DNA damage signaling function.     

Effects of hydroxyurea and aphidicolin on phosphorylation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated on Ser 1981 and histone H2AX on Ser 139 in relation to cell cycle phase and induction of apoptosis.

BACKGROUND: DNA replication stress often induces DNA damage. The antitumor drug hydroxyurea (HU), a potent inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase that halts DNA replication through its effects on cellular deoxynucleotide pools, was shown to damage DNA inducing double-strand breaks (DSBs). Aphidicolin (APH), an inhibitor of alpha-like DNA polymerases, was also reported to cause DNA damage, but the evidence for induction of DSBs by APH is not straightforward. Histone H2AX is phosphorylated on Ser 139 in response to DSBs and one of the protein kinases that phosphorylate H2AX is ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM); activation of ATM is through its phosphorylation of Ser 1981. The present study was undertaken to reveal whether H2AX is phosphorylated in cells exposed to HU or APH and whether its phosphorylation is mediated by ATM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HL-60 cells were treated in cultures with 0.1-5.0 mM HU or 1-4 muM APH for up to 5 h. Activation of ATM and H2AX phosphorylation was detected immunocytochemically using Ab specific to Ser1981-ATM or Ser 139-H2AX epitopes, respectively, concurrent with measurement of cellular DNA content. RESULTS: While exposure of cells to HU led to H2AX phosphorylation selectively during S phase and the cells progressing through the early portion of S (DI = 1.1-1.4) were more affected than late-S phase (DI = 1.6-1.9) cells, ATM was not activated by HU. In fact, the level of constitutive ("programmed") ATM phosphorylation was distinctly suppressed, in all phases of the cell cycle, at 0.1-5.0 mM HU. Cells' exposure to APH also resulted in H2AX phosphorylation at Ser139 with no evidence of ATM activation, and as in the case of HU, the early-S cells were more affected than the late-S phase cells. The rise in frequency of apoptotic cells became apparent after 2 h of exposure to HU or APH, and all apoptotic cells had markedly elevated levels of both H2AX-Ser139 and ATM-Ser1981 phosphorylation. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of correlation between H2AX phosphorylation and ATM activation indicates that protein kinase(s) other than ATM (ATR and/or DNA-dependent protein kinase) are activated by DSBs induced by replication stress. Interestingly, HU inhibits the constitutive ("programmed") level of ATM phosphorylation in untreated cells. However, DNA fragmentation during apoptosis activates ATM and dramatically increases level of H2AX phosphorylation.     

Induction of ATM Activation,Histone H2AX Phosphorylation and Apoptosis by Etoposide: Relation to Cell Cycle Phase

Etoposide (VP-16) belongs to the family of DNA topoisomerase II (topo2) inhibitors, drugs widely used in cancer chemotherapy. Their presumed mode of action is stabilization of “cleavable complexes” between topo2 and DNA; collisions of DNA replication forks with these complexes convert them into DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), potentially lethal lesions that may trigger apoptosis. Immunocytochemical detection of activation of ATM (ATM-S1981P) and histone H2AX phosphorylation (γH2AX) provides a sensitive probe of the induction of DSBs in individual cells. Using multiparameter cytometry we measured the expression of ATM-S1981P and γH2AX as well as initiation of apoptosis (caspase-3 activation) in relation to the cell cycle phase in etoposide-treated human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells. The induction of ATM-S1981P and γH2AX was seen in all phases of the cell cycle. The G1-phase cells, however, preferentially underwent apoptosis. The extent of etoposide-induced H2AX phosphorylation was partially reduced by N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), a scavenger of reactive oxygen species (ROS).The maximal reduction of H2AX phosphorylation by NAC, seen in G1-phase cells, was nearly 50%. NAC also protected a fraction of G1 cells from etoposide-induced apoptosis, but had no such effect on S or G2M cells. However, no significant rise in the intracellular level of ROS upon treatment with etoposide was detected. The effects of etoposide were compared with the previously investigated effects of another topo2 inhibitor, mitoxantrone. The latter was seen to induce a maximal level of ATM-S1981P and γH2AX (partially abrogated by NAC) in G1-phase cells, but unlike etoposide, triggered apoptosis exclusively of S-phase cells. The data suggest that in addition to the generally accepted mechanism involving collisions of replication forks with the “cleavable complexes”, other mechanisms which appear to be different for etoposide vs. mitoxantrone, may contribute to formation of DSBs and to triggering of apoptosis.     

γH2AX: A potential DNA damage response biomarker for assessing toxicological risk of tobacco products

Differentiation among American cigarettes relies primarily on the use of proprietary tobacco blends, menthol, tobacco substitutes, paper porosity, paper additives, and filter ventilation. These characteristics substantially alter per cigarette yields of tar and nicotine in standardized protocols promulgated by government agencies. However, due to compensatory alterations in smoking behavior to sustain a preferred nicotine dose (e.g., by increasing puff frequency, inhaling more deeply, smoking more cigarettes per day, or blocking filter ventilation holes), smokers actually inhale similar amounts of tar and nicotine regardless of any cigarette variable, supporting epidemiological evidence that all brands have comparable disease risk. Consequently, it would be advantageous to develop assays that realistically compare cigarette smoke (CS)-induced genotoxicity regardless of differences in cigarette construction or smoking behavior. One significant indicator of potentially carcinogenic DNA damage is double strand breaks (DSBs), which can be monitored by measuring Ser 139 phosphorylation on histone H2AX. Previously we showed that phosphorylation of H2AX (defined as γH2AX) in exposed lung cells is proportional to CS dose. Thus, we proposed that γH2AX may be a viable biomarker for evaluating genotoxic risk of cigarettes in relation to actual nicotine/tar delivery. Here we tested this hypothesis by measuring γH2AX levels in A549 human lung cells exposed to CS from a range of commercial cigarettes using various smoking regimens. Results show that γH2AX induction, a critical event of the mammalian DNA damage response, provides an assessment of CS-induced DNA damage independent of smoking topography or cigarette type. We conclude that γH2AX induction shows promise as a genotoxic bioassay offering specific advantages over the traditional assays for the evaluation of conventional and nonconventional tobacco products.     

Phosphorylation of p53 on Ser15 during cell cycle and caused by Topo I and Topo II inhibitors in relation to ATM and Chk2 activation

The DNA topoisomerase I (topo1) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) and topo2 inhibitor mitoxantrone (MXT) damage DNA inducing formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). We have recently examined the kinetics of ATM and Chk2 activation as well as histone H2AX phosphorylation, the reporters of DNA damage, in individual human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells treated with these drugs. Using a phospho-specific Ab to tumor suppressor protein p53 phosphorylated on Ser15 (p53-Ser15P) combined with an Ab that detects p53 regardless of the phosphorylation status and multiparameter cytometry we correlated the TPT- and MXT- induced p53-Ser15P with ATM and Chk2 activation as well as with H2AX phosphorylation in relation to the cell cycle phase. In untreated interphase cells, p53-Ser15P had "patchy" localization throughout the nucleoplasm while mitotic cells showed strong p53-Ser15P cytoplasmic immunofluorescence (IF). The intense phosphorylation of p53-Ser15, combined with activation of ATM and Chk2 (involving centrioles) as well as phosphorylation of H2AX seen in the untreated mitotic cells, suggest mobilization of the DNA damage detection/repair machinery in controlling cytokinesis. In the nuclei of cells treated with TPT or MXT, the expression of p53-Ser15P appeared as closely packed foci of intense IF. Following TPT treatment, the induction of p53-Ser15P was most pronounced in S-phase cells while no significant cell cycle phase differences were seen in cells treated with MXT. The maximal increase in p53-Ser15P expression, rising up to 2.5-fold above the level of its constitutive expression, was observed in cells treated with TPT or MXT for 4 - 6 h. This maximum expression of p53-Ser15P coincided in time with the peak of Chk2 activation but not with ATM activation and H2AX phosphorylation, both of which crested 1-2 h after the treatment with TPT or MXT. The respective kinetics of p53-Ser15 phosphorylation versus ATM and Chk2 activation suggest that in response to DNA damage by TPT or MXT, Chk2 rather than ATM mediates p53 phosphorylation.     

Oxidative stress induces H2AX phosphorylation in human spermatozoa

H2AX phosphorylation occurs following the induction of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), thus collaborating with many other proteins to mediate important biological functions in somatic cells. In human spermatozoa, the present study showed that H(2)O(2) induced H2AX phosphorylation in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Moreover, such effect could be abolished by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin. Meanwhile, the neutral comet assay also revealed DSBs production in correlation with H2AX phosphorylation assessed by flow cytometry. Besides H2AX phosphorylation, two other collaborating proteins, Rad50 and 53BP1, were also generated in spermatozoa after H(2)O(2) exposure. However, unlike in somatic FL cells, there were no distinctive focuses, but rather a whole nuclei staining pattern of these three proteins in spermatozoa. Additionally, gammaH2AX (the phosphorylated form of H2AX) staining in spermatozoa persisted despite the fact of a decrease in the number of gammaH2AX foci in FL cells after H(2)O(2) removal. Collectively, these results demonstrate that oxidative stress can induce H2AX phosphorylation in human spermatozoa through DSB induction, and that gammaH2AX may be used as a sensitive, novel marker for such DSBs. Moreover, the surveillance system involving gammaH2AX, Rad50, and 53BP1 in human spermatozoa cannot function effectively in DNA repair, but this system may possess other biological functions in response to DSBs.     

Comparison of the induction and disappearance of DNA double strand breaks and gamma-H2AX foci after irradiation of chromosomes in G1-phase or in condensed metaphase cells

The induction and disappearance of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) after irradiation of G1 and mitotic cells were compared with the gamma-H2AX foci assay and a gel electrophoresis assay. This is to determine whether cell cycle related changes in chromatin structure might influence the gamma-H2AX assay which depends on extensive phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the H2AX histone variant surrounding DSBs. The disappearance of gamma-H2AX foci after irradiation was much slower for mitotic than for G1 cells. On the other hand, no difference was seen for the gel electrophoresis assay. Our data may suggest the limited accessibility of dephosphorylation enzyme in irradiated metaphase cells or trapped gamma-H2AX in condensed chromatin.     

Low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity is not caused by a failure to recognize DNA double-strand breaks

One of the earliest cellular responses to radiation-induced DNA damage is the phosphorylation of the histone variant H2AX (gamma-H2AX). gamma-H2AX facilitates the local concentration and focus formation of numerous repair-related proteins within the vicinity of DNA DSBs. Previously, we have shown that low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS), the excessive sensitivity of mammalian cells to very low doses of ionizing radiation, is a response specific to G(2)-phase cells and is attributed to evasion of an ATM-dependent G(2)-phase cell cycle checkpoint. To further define the mechanism of low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity, we investigated the relationship between the recognition of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks as defined by gamma-H2AX staining and the incidence of HRS in three pairs of isogenic cell lines with known differences in radiosensitivity and DNA repair functionality (disparate RAS, ATM or DNA-PKcs status). Marked differences between the six cell lines in cell survival were observed after high-dose exposures (>1 Gy) reflective of the DNA repair capabilities of the individual six cell lines. In contrast, the absence of functional ATM or DNA-PK activity did not affect cell survival outcome below 0.2 Gy, supporting the concept that HRS is a measure of radiation sensitivity in the absence of fully functional repair. No relationship was evident between the initial numbers of DNA DSBs scored immediately after either low- or high-dose radiation exposure with cell survival for any of the cell lines, indicating that the prevalence of HRS is not related to recognition of DNA DSBs. However, residual DNA DSB damage as indicated by the persistence of gamma-H2AX foci 4 h after exposure was significantly correlated with cell survival after exposure to 2 Gy. This observation suggests that the persistence of gamma-H2AX foci could be adopted as a surrogate assay of cellular radiosensitivity to predict clinical radiation responsiveness.     

Numerical Analysis of Etoposide Induced DNA Breaks

Background

Etoposide is a cancer drug that induces strand breaks in cellular DNA by inhibiting topoisomerase II (topoII) religation of cleaved DNA molecules. Although DNA cleavage by topoisomerase II always produces topoisomerase II-linked DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), the action of etoposide also results in single-strand breaks (SSBs), since religation of the two strands are independently inhibited by etoposide. In addition, recent studies indicate that topoisomerase II-linked DSBs remain undetected unless topoisomerase II is removed to produce free DSBs.

Methodology/Principal Findings

To examine etoposide-induced DNA damage in more detail we compared the relative amount of SSBs and DSBs, survival and H2AX phosphorylation in cells treated with etoposide or calicheamicin, a drug that produces free DSBs and SSBs. With this combination of methods we found that only 3% of the DNA strand breaks induced by etoposide were DSBs. By comparing the level of DSBs, H2AX phosphorylation and toxicity induced by etoposide and calicheamicin, we found that only 10% of etoposide-induced DSBs resulted in histone H2AX phosphorylation and toxicity. There was a close match between toxicity and histone H2AX phosphorylation for calicheamicin and etoposide suggesting that the few etoposide-induced DSBs that activated H2AX phosphorylation were responsible for toxicity.

Conclusions/Significance

These results show that only 0.3% of all strand breaks produced by etoposide activate H2AX phosphorylation and suggests that over 99% of the etoposide induced DNA damage does not contribute to its toxicity.     

Induction of DNA damage signaling by oxidative stress in relation to DNA replication as detected using "click chemistry"

Induction of DNA damage by oxidants such as H(2) O(2) activates the complex network of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways present in cells to initiate DNA repair, halt cell cycle progression, and prepare an apoptotic reaction. We have previously reported that activation of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated protein kinase (ATM) and induction of γH2AX are among the early events of the DDR induced by exposure of cells to H(2) O(2) , and in human pulmonary carcinoma A549 cells, both events were expressed predominantly during S-phase. This study was designed to further explore a correlation between these events and DNA replication. Toward this end, we utilized 5-ethynyl-2'deoxyuridine (EdU) and the "click chemistry" approach to label DNA during replication, followed by exposure of A549 cells to H(2) O(2) . Multiparameter laser scanning cytometric analysis of these cells made it possible to identify DNA replicating cells and directly correlate H(2) O(2) -induced ATM activation and induction of γH2AX with DNA replication on a cell by cell basis. After pulse-labeling with EdU and exposure to H(2) O(2) , confocal microscopy was also used to examine the localization of DNA replication sites ("replication factories") versus the H2AX phosphorylation sites (γH2AX foci) in nuclear chromatin in an attempt to observe the absence or presence of colocalization. The data indicate a close association between DNA replication and H2AX phosphorylation in A549 cells, suggesting that these DNA damage response events may be triggered by stalled replication forks and perhaps also by induction of DNA double-strand breaks at the primary DNA lesions induced by H(2) O(2) .     

DNA end resection is needed for the repair of complex lesions in G1-phase human cells

Repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) is influenced by the chemical complexity of the lesion. Clustered lesions (complex DSBs) are generally considered more difficult to repair and responsible for early and late cellular effects after exposure to genotoxic agents. Resection is commonly used by the cells as part of the homologous recombination (HR) pathway in S- and G2-phase. In contrast, DNA resection in G1-phase may lead to an error-prone microhomology-mediated end joining. We induced DNA lesions with a wide range of complexity by irradiation of mammalian cells with X-rays or accelerated ions of different velocity and mass. We found replication protein A (RPA) foci indicating DSB resection both in S/G2- and G1-cells, and the fraction of resection-positive cells correlates with the severity of lesion complexity throughout the cell cycle. Besides RPA, Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) was recruited to complex DSBs both in S/G2- and G1-cells. Resection of complex DSBs is driven by meiotic recombination 11 homolog A (MRE11), CTBP-interacting protein (CtIP), and exonuclease 1 (EXO1) but seems not controlled by the Ku heterodimer or by phosphorylation of H2AX. Reduced resection capacity by CtIP depletion increased cell killing and the fraction of unrepaired DSBs after exposure to densely ionizing heavy ions, but not to X-rays. We conclude that in mammalian cells resection is essential for repair of complex DSBs in all phases of the cell-cycle and targeting this process sensitizes mammalian cells to cytotoxic agents inducing clustered breaks, such as in heavy-ion cancer therapy.     

Phosphorylation of histone H2AX at M phase in human cells without DNA damage response

A variant of histone H2A, H2AX, is phosphorylated on Ser139 in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), and clusters of the phosphorylated form of H2AX (gamma-H2AX) in nuclei of DSB-induced cells show foci at breakage sites. Here, we show phosphorylation of H2AX in a cell cycle-dependent manner without any detectable DNA damage response. Western blot and immunocytochemical analyses with the anti-gamma-H2AX antibody revealed that H2AX is phosphorylated at M phase in HeLa cells. In ataxia-telangiectasia cells lacking ATM kinase activity, gamma-H2AX was scarcely detectable in the mitotic chromosomes, suggesting involvement of ATM in M-phase phosphorylation of H2AX. Single-cell gel electrophoresis assay and Western blot analysis with the anti-phospho-p53 (Ser15) antibody indicated that H2AX in human M-phase cells is phosphorylated independently of DSB and DNA damage signaling. Even in the absence of DNA damage, phosphorylation of H2AX in normal cell cycle progression may contribute to maintenance of genomic integrity.     

Sequential phosphorylation of Ser-10 on histone H3 and ser-139 on histone H2AX and ATM activation during premature chromosome condensation: relationship to cell-cycle phase and apoptosis.

BACKGROUND: Histone H1 and H3 phosphorylation associated with chromatin condensation during mitosis has been studied extensively. Less is known on histone modifications that occur during premature chromosome condensation (PCC). The aim of the present study was to reveal the status of histone H3 and H2AX phosphorylation on Ser-10 and Ser-139, respectively, as well as ATM activation through phosphorylation on Ser-1981, during PCC, and relate these events to cell-cycle phase and to initiation of apoptosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To induce PCC, A549 and HL-60 cells were exposed to the phosphatase inhibitor calyculin A (Cal A). Phosphorylation of histone H3 and H2AX as well as ATM activation were detected immunocytochemically concurrent with analysis of cellular DNA content and activation of caspase-3, a marker of apoptosis. The intensity of cellular fluorescence was measured by flow- or laser scanning cytometry. RESULTS: Induction of PCC led to rapid histone H3 phosphorylation, followed by activation of ATM and then H2AX phosphorylation in both, HL-60 and A549 cells. All these events occurred sequentially, prior to caspase-3 activation, and affected cells in all phases of the cell cycle. ATM activation and H2AX phosphorylation was seen during mitosis of A549 but not HL-60 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Because the Cal A-induced phosphorylation of histone H3 and H2AX, and of ATM, precede caspase-3 activation these modifications are pertinent to PCC and not to apoptosis-associated chromatin condensation. The sequence of histone H3 and H2AX phosphorylation and ATM activation during PCC is compatible with a role of ATM in mediating phosphorylation of H2AX but not H3. Mitosis in some cell types may proceed without ATM activation and H2AX phosphorylation.     

Deficiency in the response to DNA double-strand breaks in mouse early preimplantation embryos

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are caused by various environmental stresses, such as ionizing radiation and DNA-damaging agents. When DSBs occur, cell cycle checkpoint mechanisms function to stop the cell cycle until all DSBs are repaired; the phosphorylation of H2AX plays an important role in this process. Mouse preimplantation-stage embryos are hypersensitive to ionizing radiation, and X-irradiated mouse zygotes are arrested at the G2 phase of the first cell cycle. To investigate the mechanisms responding to DNA damage at G2 in mouse preimplantation embryos, we examined G2/M checkpoint and DNA repair mechanisms in these embryos. Most of the one- and two-cell embryos in which DSBs had been induced by gamma-irradiation underwent a delay in cleavage and ceased development before the blastocyst stage. In these embryos, phosphorylated H2AX (gamma-H2AX) was not detected in the one- or two-cell stages by immunocytochemistry, although it was detected after the two-cell stage during preimplantation development. These results suggest that the G2/M checkpoint and DNA repair mechanisms have insufficient function in one- and two-cell embryos, causing hypersensitivity to gamma-irradiation. In addition, phosphorylated ataxia telangiectasia mutated protein and DNA protein kinase catalytic subunits, which phosphorylate H2AX, were detected in the embryos at one- and two-cell stages, as well as at other preimplantation stages, suggesting that the absence of gamma-H2AX in one- and two-cell embryos depends on some factor(s) other than these kinases.