p14ARF interacts with DAXX: Effects on HDM2 and p53

The p14ARF (ARF) tumour suppressor plays an important role in the cellular response to oncogene activation. In this report, we demonstrate an interaction between ARF and DAXX, a highly conserved protein with identified roles in the regulation of gene expression. HDM2 was shown to interact with each of ARF and DAXX upon upregulation of expression as well as at lower expression levels following transfection of ARF and DAXX. Through immunofluorescence analysis, we observed that endogenous ARF and DAXX colocalize both to nucleoli and to nuclear bodies in cell lines that co-express both proteins. Similar results were obtained upon co-transfection of ARF and DAXX. Co-expression of ARF and DAXX was further found to inhibit ARF-mediated HDM2 sumoylation and to induce sumoylation and ubiquitination of DAXX itself, implicating DAXX as a substrate of ARF-mediated post-translational events. We also observed induction of p53 sumoylation in the presence of ARF and DAXX, an effect that was inhibited by upregulation of HDM2 expression. In summary, we have identified DAXX as a novel ARF binding partner and substrate of ARF-mediated sumoylation and suggest that DAXX acts as a modifier of both p53-dependent and p53-independent ARF function.     

Nucleolar Arf sequesters Mdm2 and activates p53

The Ink4/Arf locus encodes two tumour-suppressor proteins, p16Ink4a and p19Arf, that govern the antiproliferative functions of the retinoblastoma and p53 proteins, respectively. Here we show that Arf binds to the product of the Mdm2 gene and sequesters it into the nucleolus, thereby preventing negative-feedback regulation of p53 by Mdm2 and leading to the activation of p53 in the nucleoplasm. Arf and Mdm2 co-localize in the nucleolus in response to activation of the oncoprotein Myc and as mouse fibroblasts undergo replicative senescence. These topological interactions of Arf and Mdm2 point towards a new mechanism for p53 activation.     

N-Acylpolyamine inhibitors of HDM2 and HDMX binding to p53

Selective inhibition of protein–protein interactions important for cellular processes could lead to the development of new therapies against disease. In the area of cancer, overexpression of the proteins human double minute 2 (HDM2) and its homolog HDMX has been linked to tumor aggressiveness. Both HDM2 and HDMX bind to p53 and prevent cell cycle arrest or apoptosis in damaged cells. Developing a strategy to simultaneously prevent the binding of both HDM2 and HDMX to p53 is an essential feature of inhibitors to restore p53 activity in a number of different cancers. Inhibition of protein–protein interactions with synthetic molecules is an emerging area of research that requires new inhibitors tailored to mimic the types of interfaces between proteins. Our strategy to create inhibitors of protein–protein interactions is to develop a non-natural scaffold that may be used as a starting point to identify important molecular components necessary for inhibition. In this study, we report an N-acylpolyamine (NAPA) scaffold that supports numerous sidechains in a compact atomic arrangement. NAPAs were constructed by a series of reductive aminations between amino acid derivatives followed by acylation at the resulting secondary amine. An optimized NAPA was able to equally inhibit the association of both HDM2 and HDMX with p53. Our results demonstrate some of the challenges associated with targeting multiple protein–protein interactions involved in overlapping cellular processes.     

HDM2 negatively affects the Chk2-mediated phosphorylation of p53

By GST pull downs and co-immunoprecipitation analyses we found that recombinant Chk2 and HDM2 can form stable complexes in vitro. Chk2/HDM2 complexes were also detected in transfected Cos-1 cells over-expressing both proteins. Furthermore, we show that HDM2, as would be expected, severely affects the Chk2-catalyzed phosphorylation of p53. HDM2 itself is only slightly phosphorylated by Chk2. However, whereas HDM2 inhibits the Chk2-catalyzed p53 phosphorylation, HDM2 phosphorylation by Chk2 doubles in the presence of p53. The significance of the HDM2 phosphorylation is unknown, but it is possible that it might influence the stability of the HDM2/p53 complex.     

5-Deazaflavin derivatives as inhibitors of p53 ubiquitination by HDM2

Based on previous reports of certain 5-deazaflavin derivatives being capable of activating the tumour suppressor p53 in cancer cells through inhibition of the p53-specific ubiquitin E3 ligase HDM2, we have conducted an structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis through systematic modification of the 5-deazaflavin template. This analysis shows that HDM2-inhibitory activity depends on a combination of factors. The most active compounds (e.g., 15) contain a trifluoromethyl or chloro substituent at the deazaflavin C9 position and this activity depends to a large extent on the presence of at least one additional halogen or methyl substituent of the phenyl group at N10. Our SAR results, in combination with the HDM2 RING domain receptor recognition model we present, form the basis for the design of drug-like and potent activators of p53 for potential cancer therapy.     

Nucleolar protein GLTSCR2 stabilizes p53 in response to ribosomal stresses

p53 is a key regulator of cell growth and death by controlling cell cycle progression and apoptosis under conditions of stress such as DNA damage or oncogenic stimulation. As these processes are critical for cell function and inhibition of tumor development, p53 regulatory pathways are strictly monitored in cells. Recently, it was recognized that nucleolar proteins, including nucleophosmin/B23, ribosomal protein L11, and alternate reading frame (ARF), form the nucleolus-ARF-murine double minute 2 (MDM2) axis in p53 regulatory pathways, which increases p53 stability by suppressing the activity of MDM2. In this work, we show that nucleolar protein glioma tumor-suppressor candidate region gene 2 (GLTSCR2) translocates to the nucleoplasm under ribosomal stress, where it interacts with and stabilizes p53 and inhibits cell cycle progression without the involvement of the major upstream p53 regulator, ARF. Furthermore, ectopic expression of GLTSCR2 significantly suppressed growth of cancer cells in a xenograft animal model via p53-dependent pathway. Our data identify GLTSCR2 as a new member of the nucleolus-nucleoplasmic axis for p53 regulation. ARF-independent direct regulation of p53 by GLTSCR2 may be a key mechanism and therapeutic target for cell death or growth inhibition when nucleolus-ARF-p53 pathways are inactivated by genetic or epigenetic modifications of ARF, which are the second most common types of genetic change observed in human cancers.     

Phosphorylation of p53 by TAF1 Inactivates p53-Dependent Transcription in the DNA Damage Response

1. Download : Download high-res image (139KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Inhibition of HDM2 and activation of p53 by ribosomal protein L23

The importance of coordinating cell growth with proliferation has been recognized for a long time. The molecular basis of this relationship, however, is poorly understood. Here we show that the ribosomal protein L23 interacts with HDM2. The interaction involves the central acidic domain of HDM2 and an N-terminal domain of L23. L23 and L11, another HDM2-interacting ribosomal protein, can simultaneously yet distinctly interact with HDM2 together to form a ternary complex. We show that, when overexpressed, L23 inhibits HDM2-induced p53 polyubiquitination and degradation and causes a p53-dependent cell cycle arrest. On the other hand, knocking down L23 causes nucleolar stress and triggers translocation of B23 from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm, leading to stabilization and activation of p53. Our data suggest that cells may maintain a steady-state level of L23 during normal growth; alternating the levels of L23 in response to changing growth conditions could impinge on the HDM2-p53 pathway by interrupting the integrity of the nucleolus.     

Requirement for HDM2 activity in the rapid degradation of p53 in neuroblastoma

The wild type p53 tumor suppressor protein is rapidly degraded in normal cells by MDM2, the ubiquitin ligase that serves as the key regulator of p53 function by modulating protein stability. Cellular exposure to genotoxic stress triggers the stabilization of p53 by multiple pathways that converge upon interference with MDM2 function. In this study, we first investigated the ability of HDM2 (MDM2 human homologue) to degrade endogenous p53 in neuroblastoma (NB). Although the p53 protein in NB has been reported to be constitutively stabilized, we find that HDM2 in NB is functional and facilitates the rapid turnover of p53 in nonstressed cells via the proteasome pathway. Second, we examined the relationship between p53 and HDM2 in the adriamycin-mediated stabilization of p53 in NB. We demonstrate that while p53 stabilization depends neither upon the phosphorylation of specific N-terminal sites nor upon dissociation from HDM2, it requires inactivation of functional HDM2. In support of this notion, p53 stabilization following adriamycin resulted in an inhibition of both p53 ubiquitination and HDM2 ligase activity. Taken together, these data implicate a requirement for enzymatic inactivation of HDM2 as a novel mechanism for p53 stabilization in the DNA damage response pathway.     

p53 promotes its own polyubiquitination by enhancing the HDM2 and HDMX interaction

HDM2 and HDMX are two homologs essential for controlling p53 tumor suppressor activity under normal conditions. Both proteins bind different sites on the p53 N‐terminus, and while HDM2 has E3 ubiquitin ligase activity towards p53, HDMX does not. Nevertheless, HDMX is required for p53 polyubiquitination and degradation, but the underlying molecular mechanism remains unclear. Alone, HDMX and HDM2 interact via their respective C‐terminal RING domains but here we show that the presence of p53 induces an N‐terminal interface under normal cellular conditions. This results in an increase in HDM2‐mediated p53 polyubiquitination and degradation. The HDM2 inhibitor Nutlin‐3 binds the N‐terminal p53 binding pocket and is sufficient to induce the HDM2‐HDMX interaction, suggesting that the mechanism depends on allosteric changes that control the multiprotein complex formation. These results demonstrate an allosteric interchange between three different proteins (HDMX‐HDM2‐p53) and help to explain the molecular mechanisms of HDM2‐inhibitory drugs.     

The Nucleolar Protein Myb-binding Protein 1A (MYBBP1A) Enhances p53 Tetramerization and Acetylation in Response to Nucleolar Disruption

Tetramerization of p53 is crucial to exert its biological activity, and nucleolar disruption is sufficient to activate p53. We previously demonstrated that nucleolar stress induces translocation of the nucleolar protein MYBBP1A from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm and enhances p53 activity. However, whether and how MYBBP1A regulates p53 tetramerization in response to nucleolar stress remain unclear. In this study, we demonstrated that MYBBP1A enhances p53 tetramerization, followed by acetylation under nucleolar stress. We found that MYBBP1A has two regions that directly bind to lysine residues of the p53 C-terminal regulatory domain. MYBBP1A formed a self-assembled complex that provided a molecular platform for p53 tetramerization and enhanced p300-mediated acetylation of the p53 tetramer. Moreover, our results show that MYBBP1A functions to enhance p53 tetramerization that is necessary for p53 activation, followed by cell death with actinomycin D treatment. Thus, we suggest that MYBBP1A plays a pivotal role in the cellular stress response.     

An intact HDM2 RING-finger domain is required for nuclear exclusion of p53

The p53 tumour-suppressor protein is negatively regulated by HDM2. Recent reports indicate that the leucine-rich nuclear-export sequence (NES) of HDM2 enables it to shuttle to the cytoplasm, and that this activity is required for degradation of p53. However, it is unclear whether HDM2 is involved in nuclear export of p53, partly because p53 has itself been shown to contain a functional NES within its tetramerization domain. Here we show that co-expression of HDM2 with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged p53 causes redistribution of p53 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm of the cell. This activity is dependent on binding of p53 to HDM2, and requires an intact p53 NES, but is independent of the HDM2 NES. A mutant of the HDM2 RING-finger domain that is unable to ubiquitinate p53 does not cause relocalization of p53, indicating that ubiquitin ligation or other activities of this region of HDM2 may be necessary for its regulation of p53 localization.     

The Regulation of the p53-mediated Stress Response by MDM2 and MDM4

Exquisite control of the activity of p53 is necessary for mammalian survival. Too much p53 is lethal, whereas too little permits tumorigenesis. MDM2 and MDM4 are structurally related proteins critical for the control of p53 activity during development, homeostasis, and the response to stress. These two essential proteins regulate both the activation of p53 in response to stress and the recovery of cells following resolution of the damage, yet both are oncogenic when overexpressed. Thus, multiple regulatory circuits ensure that their activities are fine-tuned to promote tumor-free survival. Numerous diverse stressors activate p53, and much research has gone into trying to find commonalities between them that would explain the mechanism by which p53 becomes active. It is now clear that although these diverse stressors activate p53 by different biochemical pathways, one common feature is the effort they direct, through a variety of means, toward disrupting the functions of both MDM2 and MDM4. This article provides an overview of the relationship between MDM2 and MDM4, features the various biochemical mechanisms by which p53 is activated through inhibition of their functions, and proposes some emerging areas for investigation of the p53-mediated stress response.Regulation of the p53-mediated stress response by the essential inhibitory proteins MDM2 and MDM4 is critical for survival. In response to stressors such as ionizing radiation, p53 induces a number of potentially lethal but tumor-suppressive processes, including cell cycle arrest, senescence, and apoptosis (reviewed by Horn and Vousden 2007). Both MDM2 and MDM4 are critical to surviving the p53-mediated stress response to whole body ionizing irradiation as mice with reduced levels of either protein undergo p53-dependent death after exposure to doses of radiation that are sublethal to wild-type mice (Mendrysa et al. 2003; Terzian et al. 2007). MDM2 and MDM4 are also required to control p53 function during development, as shown by the early embryonic death of mice lacking either MDM2 or MDM4, unless they also lack p53 (Jones et al. 1995; Montes de Oca Luna et al. 1995; Parant et al. 2001; Migliorini et al. 2002).Although both MDM2 and MDM4 are essential for development, they are detrimental to long-term survival when in excess, because both are oncogenic. Both MDM2 and MDM4 confer the tumorigenic phenotype on cultured cells when experimentally overexpressed (Fakharzadeh et al. 1991; Danovi et al. 2004). In addition, targeted expression of MDM2 in the mammary gland results in tumorigenesis (Lundgren et al. 1997). In people, single nucleotide polymorphisms that reduce expression of either of the orthologs of MDM2 or MDM4 (also referred to as Hdm2 and Hdm4) correlate with increased risk for breast cancer (Bond et al. 2004; Atwal et al. 2009). Approximately 10% of human tumors have been found to overexpress either MDM2 or MDM4 and many of these express wild-type p53 (reviewed in Toledo and Wahl 2006). Because the majority of human cancers express mutant forms of p53, overexpression of MDM2 and MDM4 in the subset of tumors expressing wild-type p53 supports the notion that excessive MDM2 and MDM4 promote tumorigenesis, at least in part, by blocking p53 function. Thus, limiting the activities of MDM2 and MDM4 is important to prevent cancer.