X chromosome inactivation in human and mouse pluripotent stem cells

Since the groundbreaking hypothesis of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) proposed by Mary Lyon over 50 years ago, a great amount of knowledge has been gained regarding this essential dosage compensation mechanism in female cells. For the mammalian system, most of the mechanistic studies of XCI have so far been investigated in the mouse model system, but recently, a number of interesting XCI studies have been extended to human pluripotent stem cells, including both embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Emerging data indicate that XCI in hESCs and hiPSCs is much more complicated than that of their mouse counterparts. XCI in human pluripotent stem cells is not as stable and is subject to environmental influences and epigenetic regulation in vitro. This mini-review highlights the key differences in XCI between mouse and human stem cells with a greater emphasis placed on the understanding of the epigenetic regulation of XCI in human stem cells.     

Allele‐specific expression of the MAOA gene and X chromosome inactivation in in vitro produced bovine embryos

During embryogenesis, one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated in embryos. The production of embryos in vitro may affect epigenetic mechanisms that could alter the expression of genes related to embryo development and X chromosome inactivation (XCI). The aim of this study was to understand XCI during in vitro, pre‐implantation bovine embryo development by characterizing the allele‐specific expression pattern of the X chromosome‐linked gene, monoamine oxidase A (MAOA). Two pools of ten embryos, comprised of the 4‐, 8‐ to 16‐cell, morula, blastocyst, and expanded blastocyst stages, were collected. Total RNA from embryos was isolated, and the RT‐PCR‐RFLP technique was used to observe expression of the MAOA gene. The DNA amplicons were also sequenced using the dideoxy sequencing method. MAOA mRNA was detected, and allele‐specific expression was identified in each pool of embryos. We showed the presence of both the maternal and paternal alleles in the 4‐, 8‐ to 16‐cell, blastocyst and expanded blastocyst embryos, but only the maternal allele was present in the morula stage. Therefore, we can affirm that the paternal X chromosome is totally inactivated at the morula stage and reactivated at the blastocyst stage. To our knowledge, this is the first report of allele‐specific expression of an X‐linked gene that is subject to XCI in in vitro bovine embryos from the 4‐cell to expanded blastocyst stages. We have established a pattern of XCI in our in vitro embryo production system that can be useful as a marker to assist the development of new protocols for in vitro embryo production. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77: 615–621, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

X chromosome inactivation mosaicism in the mouse

A cytologically detectable mosaicism resulting from X-chromosome inactivation occurring in mice heterozygous for Cattanach's translocation has been used to examine the time of X chromosome inactivation, and the sizes of primordial precursor pools for lung, thymus, spleen, fascia, and melanocytes. The extent of covariance in mosaic composition among tissues within individuals suggests that, if X inactivation occurs randomly, it must occur after determination of embryoblast cells, at some time immediately before or after implantation, and that it must occur before divergence of mesoderm from ectoderm. The extent of independent variance among the various tissues is such as to suggest that none of them arise from primordial precursor pools smaller than 20 to 30 cells.     

Origin and evolution of X chromosome inactivation

Evolution of the mammalian sex chromosomes heavily impacts on the expression of X-encoded genes, both in marsupials and placental mammals. The loss of genes from the Y chromosome forced a two-fold upregulation of dose sensitive X-linked homologues. As a corollary, female cells would experience a lethal dose of X-linked genes, if this upregulation was not counteracted by evolution of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) that allows for only one active X chromosome per diploid genome. Marsupials rely on imprinted XCI, which inactivates always the paternally inherited X chromosome. In placental mammals, random XCI (rXCI) is the predominant form, inactivating either the maternal or paternal X. In this review, we discuss recent new insights in the regulation of XCI. Based on these findings, we propose an X inactivation center (Xic), composed of a cis-Xic and trans-Xic that encompass all elements and factors acting to control rXCI either in cis or in trans. We also highlight that XCI may have evolved from a very small nucleation site on the X chromosome in the vicinity of the Sox3 gene. Finally, we discuss the possible evolutionary road maps that resulted in imprinted XCI and rXCI as observed in present day mammals.     

X chromosome inactivation: theme and variations

My contribution to this special issue on Vertebrate Sex Chromosomes deals with the theme of X chromosome inactivation and its variations. I will argue that the single active X--characteristic of mammalian X dosage compensation--is unique to mammals, and that the major underlying mechanism(s) must be the same for most of them. The variable features reflect modifications that do not interfere with the basic theme. These variations were acquired during mammalian evolution--to solve special needs for imprinting and locking in the inactive state. Some of the adaptations reinforce the basic theme, and were needed because of species differences in the timing of interacting developmental events. Elucidating the molecular basis for the single active X requires that we distinguish the mechanisms essential for the basic theme from those responsible for its variations.     

Non-random X chromosome inactivation in Aicardi syndrome

Most females have random X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), defined as an equal likelihood for inactivation of the maternally- or paternally-derived X chromosome in each cell. Several X-linked disorders have been associated with a higher prevalence of non-random XCI patterns, but previous studies on XCI patterns in Aicardi syndrome were limited by small numbers and older methodologies, and have yielded conflicting results. We studied XCI patterns in DNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes of 35 girls with typical Aicardi syndrome (AIC) from 0.25 to 16.42 years of age, using the human androgen receptor assay. Data on 33 informative samples showed non-random XCI in 11 (33%), defined as a >80:20% skewed ratio of one versus the other X chromosome being active. In six (18%) of these, there was a >95:5% extremely skewed ratio of one versus the other X chromosome being active. XCI patterns on maternal samples were not excessively skewed. The prevalence of non-random XCI in Aicardi syndrome is significantly different from that in the general population (p < 0.0001) and provides additional support for the hypothesis that Aicardi syndrome is an X-linked disorder. We also investigated the correlation between X-inactivation patterns and clinical severity and found that non-random XCI is associated with a high neurological composite severity score. Conversely, a statistically significant association was found between random XCI and the skeletal composite score. Correlations between X-inactivation patterns and individual features were made and we found a significant association between vertebral anomalies and random XCI.     

X chromosome inactivation during Drosophila spermatogenesis

Genes with male- and testis-enriched expression are under-represented on the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. There is also an excess of retrotransposed genes, many of which are expressed in testis, that have “escaped” the X chromosome and moved to the autosomes. It has been proposed that inactivation of the X chromosome during spermatogenesis contributes to these patterns: genes with a beneficial function late in spermatogenesis should be selectively favored to be autosomal in order to avoid inactivation. However, conclusive evidence for X inactivation in the male germline has been lacking. To test for such inactivation, we used a transgenic construct in which expression of a lacZ reporter gene was driven by the promoter sequence of the autosomal, testis-specific ocnus gene. Autosomal insertions of this transgene showed the expected pattern of male- and testis-specific expression. X-linked insertions, in contrast, showed only very low levels of reporter gene expression. Thus, we find that X linkage inhibits the activity of a testis-specific promoter. We obtained the same result using a vector in which the transgene was flanked by chromosomal insulator sequences. These results are consistent with global inactivation of the X chromosome in the male germline and support a selective explanation for X chromosome avoidance of genes with beneficial effects late in spermatogenesis.     

Stochastic models for X chromosome inactivation

Summary A multivariate Gaussian model for mammalian development is presented with the associated biological and mathematical assumptions. Many biological investigations use the female mammal X chromosome to test hypotheses and to estimate parameters of the developmental system. In particular, Lyon's (1961) hypotheses are used as a basis of the mathematical model. Experimental mouse data and three sets of human experimental data are analyzed using the hypothesized Gaussian model. The estimated biological parameters are consistent with some current biological theories.     

X chromosome inactivation in X autosome translocation carrier cows.

The pattern of X chromosome inactivation in X autosome translocation carries in a herd of Limousin-Jersey crossbred cattle was studied using the reverse banding technique consisting of 5-bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and acridine orange staining and autoradiography on cultures of solid tissues and blood samples exposed to tritiated thymidine. The late-replicating X chromosome was noted to be the normal X in strikingly high proportions of cells in cultures of different tissues from all translocation carriers. It is suggested that the predominance of cells in which the normal X is inactivated may be the result of a post-inactivation selection process. Such a selection process during the prenatal life favouring cells in which the genes of the normal X chromosome remain unexpressed in translocation carrier females may be the mechanism that helps these conceptuses escape the adverse effects of functional aneuploidy. Based on the observation that the translocation carriers of this line of cattle are exclusively females and that there is a higher than expected rate of pregnancy loss, it is also postulated that the altered X chromosome may be lethal to all male conceptuses and to some of their female counterparts.     

X chromosome imprinting and inactivation in preimplantation mammalian embryos

Dosage compensation for the mammalian X chromosome involves the silencing of one X chromosome to achieve equal X-linked gene expression between males and females. X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is controlled by a complex set of genetic elements located in a region known as the X chromosome inactivation center, and is regulated by a combination of genomic imprinting, cell lineage-dependent erasure of imprinting, an unidentified mechanism of X chromosome counting, an incompletely understood means of selection of one X chromosome for inactivation and developmentally regulated changes in X chromosome chromatin. A detailed understanding of when and how these components of XCI occur is essential for elucidating the operative mechanisms. A model accounting for early events related to XCI, including observations in uniparental and aneuploid embryos, is presented.     

X chromosome inactivation in the cycle of life

Female mammalian cells silence one of their two X chromosomes, resulting in equal expression levels of X-encoded genes in female XX and male XY cells. In mice, the X chromosomes in female cells go through sequential steps of inactivation and reactivation. Depending on the developmental time window, imprinted or random X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is initiated, and both processes lead to an inactive X chromosome that is clonally inherited. Here, we review new insights into the life cycle of XCI and provide an overview of the mechanisms regulating X inactivation and reactivation.     

X chromosome inactivation in nuclear transfer ES cells

Nuclear transfer ES (ntES) cells are established from cloned blastocysts generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer and are expected to be an important resource for regenerative medicine. However, cloned mammals, generated by similar methods, show various abnormalities, which suggest disordered gene regulation. Random X chromosome inactivation (XCI) has been observed to take place in cloned female mouse embryos, but XCI does not necessarily occur according to Xce strength, a genetic element that determines the likelihood of each X chromosome to be inactivated. This observation suggests incomplete reprogramming of epigenetic marks related to XCI. Here, we investigated XCI in ntES cell lines, which were established using differentiated embryoid bodies that originated from a female mouse ES cell line. We examined Xist RNA localization, histone modifications in the Xist locus, and XCI choice. We did not find substantial differences between the ntES lines and their parental ES line. This suggests that the Xist locus and the epigenetic marks involved in XCI are reprogrammed by nuclear transfer and subsequent ntES cell establishment. In contrast to skewed XCI in cloned mice, our observations indicate that normal XCI choice takes place in ntES cells, which supports the goal of safe therapeutic cloning for clinical use.     

Genomic and epigenomic approaches to the study of X chromosome inactivation

X chromosome inactivation represents a compelling example of chromosome-wide, long-range epigenetic gene-silencing in mammals. The cis- and trans-acting factors that establish and maintain the patterns and levels of gene expression from the active and inactive X chromosomes remain incompletely understood; however, the availability of the complete genomic sequence of the human X chromosome, together with complementary approaches that explore the computational biology, epigenetic modifications and gene expression-profiling along the chromosome, suggests that the features of the X chromosome that are responsible for its unique forms of gene regulation are increasingly amenable to experimental analysis.