Damaged peroxisomes are subject to rapid autophagic degradation in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha

Evidence is accumulating that damaged components of eukaryotic cells are removed by autophagic degradation (e.g., mitophagy). Here we show that peroxisomes that are damaged by the abrupt removal of the membrane protein Pex3 are massively and rapidly degraded even when the cells are placed at peroxisome-inducing conditions and hence need the organelles for growth. Pex3 degradation was induced by a temperature shift using Hansenula polymorpha pex3Δ cells producing a Pex3 fusion protein containing an N-terminal temperature sensitive degron sequence. The massive peroxisome degradation process, associated with Pex3 degradation, showed properties of both micro- and macropexophagy and was dependent on Atg1 and Ypt7. This mode of peroxisome degradation is of physiological significance as it was also observed at conditions that excessive ROS is formed from peroxisome metabolism, i.e., when methanol-grown wild-type cells are exposed to methanol excess conditions.     

Atg36

Eukaryotic cells adapt their organelle composition and abundance according to environmental conditions. Analysis of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3 has revealed that this protein plays a crucial role in peroxisome maintenance as it is required for peroxisome formation, segregation and breakdown. Although its function in peroxisome formation and segregation was known to involve its recruitment to the peroxisomal membrane of factors specific for these processes, the role of Pex3 in peroxisome breakdown was unclear until our recent identification of Atg36 as a novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pex3-interacting protein. Atg36 is recruited to peroxisomes by Pex3 and is required specifically for pexophagy. Atg36 is distinct from Atg30, the pexophagy receptor identified in Pichia pastoris. Atg36 interacts with Atg11 in vivo, and to a lesser extent with Atg8. These latter proteins link autophagic cargo receptors to the core autophagy machinery. Like other autophagic cargo receptors, Atg36 is a suicide receptor and is broken down in the vacuole together with its cargo. Unlike other cargo receptors, the interaction between Atg36 and Atg8 does not seem to be direct. Our recent findings suggest that Atg36 is a novel pexophagy receptor that may target peroxisomes for degradation via a noncanonical mechanism.     

Pex3 peroxisome biogenesis proteins function in peroxisome inheritance as class V myosin receptors

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, peroxisomal inheritance from mother cell to bud is conducted by the class V myosin motor, Myo2p. However, homologues of S. cerevisiae Myo2p peroxisomal receptor, Inp2p, are not readily identifiable outside the Saccharomycetaceae family. Here, we demonstrate an unexpected role for Pex3 proteins in peroxisome inheritance. Both Pex3p and Pex3Bp are peroxisomal integral membrane proteins that function as peroxisomal receptors for class V myosin through direct interaction with the myosin globular tail. In cells lacking Pex3Bp, peroxisomes are preferentially retained by the mother cell, whereas most peroxisomes gather and are transferred en masse to the bud in cells overexpressing Pex3Bp or Pex3p. Our results reveal an unprecedented role for members of the Pex3 protein family in peroxisome motility and inheritance in addition to their well-established role in peroxisome biogenesis at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results point to a temporal link between peroxisome formation and inheritance and delineate a general mechanism of peroxisome inheritance in eukaryotic cells.     

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv3034c regulates mTORC1 and PPAR‐γ dependant pexophagy mechanism to control redox levels in macrophages

Mycobacterium tuberculosis survives inside the macrophages by employing several host immune evasion strategies. Here, we reported a novel mechanism in which M. tuberculosis acetyltransferase, encoded by Rv3034c, induces peroxisome homeostasis to regulate host oxidative stress levels to facilitate intracellular mycobacterial infection. Presence of M. tuberculosis Rv3034c induces the expression of peroxisome biogenesis and proliferation factors such as Pex3, Pex5, Pex19, Pex11b, Fis‐1 and DLP‐1; while depletion of Rv3034c decreased the expression of these molecules, thereby selective degradation of peroxisomes via pexophagy. Further studies revealed that M. tuberculosis Rv3034c inhibit induction of pexophagy mechanism by down‐regulating the expression of pexophagy associated proteins (p‐AMPKα, p‐ULK‐1, Atg5, Atg7, Beclin‐1, LC3‐II, TFEB and Keap‐1) and adaptor molecules (NBR1 and p62). Inhibition was found to be dependent on the phosphorylation of mTORC1 and activation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor‐γ. In order to maintain intracellular homeostasis during oxidative stress, M. tuberculosis Rv3034c was found to induce degradation of dysfunctional and damaged peroxisomes through activation of Pex14 in infected macrophages. In conclusion, this is the first report which demonstrated that M. tuberculosis acetyltransferase regulate peroxisome homeostasis in response to intracellular redox levels to favour mycobacterial infection in macrophage.     

Multiple PEX genes are required for proper subcellular distribution and stability of Pex5p, the PTS1 receptor: evidence that PTS1 protein import is mediated by a cycling receptor

PEX5 encodes the type-1 peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS1) receptor, one of at least 15 peroxins required for peroxisome biogenesis. Pex5p has a bimodal distribution within the cell, mostly cytosolic with a small amount bound to peroxisomes. This distribution indicates that Pex5p may function as a cycling receptor, a mode of action likely to require interaction with additional peroxins. Loss of peroxins required for protein translocation into the peroxisome (PEX2 or PEX12) resulted in accumulation of Pex5p at docking sites on the peroxisome surface. Pex5p also accumulated on peroxisomes in normal cells under conditions which inhibit protein translocation into peroxisomes (low temperature or ATP depletion), returned to the cytoplasm when translocation was restored, and reaccumulated on peroxisomes when translocation was again inhibited. Translocation inhibiting conditions did not result in Pex5p redistribution in cells that lack detectable peroxisomes. Thus, it appears that Pex5p can cycle repeatedly between the cytoplasm and peroxisome. Altered activity of the peroxin defective in CG7 cells leads to accumulation of Pex5p within the peroxisome, indicating that Pex5p may actually enter the peroxisome lumen at one point in its cycle. In addition, we found that the PTS1 receptor was extremely unstable in the peroxin-deficient CG1, CG4, and CG8 cells. Altered distribution or stability of the PTS1 receptor in all cells with a defect in PTS1 protein import implies that the genes mutated in these cell lines encode proteins with a direct role in peroxisomal protein import.     

Peroxisome Formation Requires the Endoplasmic Reticulum Channel Protein Sec61

In peroxisome formation, models of near‐autonomous peroxisome biogenesis with membrane protein integration directly from the cytosol into the peroxisomal membrane are in direct conflict with models whereby peroxisomes bud from the endoplasmic reticulum and receive their membrane proteins through a branch of the secretory pathway. We therefore reinvestigated the role of the Sec 61 complex, the protein‐conducting channel of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in peroxisome formation. We found that depletion or partial inactivation of Sec 61 in yeast disables peroxisome formation. The ER entry of the early peroxisomal membrane protein Pex 3 engineered with a glycosylation tag is reduced in sec61 mutant cells. Moreover, we were able to reconstitute Pex 3 import into ER membranes in vitro, and we identified a variant of a signal anchor sequence for ER translocation at the Pex 3 N‐terminus. Our findings are consistent with a Sec 61 requirement for peroxisome formation and a fundamental role of the ER in peroxisome biogenesis.     

Pexophagy-linked degradation of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3p involves the ubiquitin–proteasome system

Peroxisome autophagy, also known as pexophagy, describes the wholesale degradation of peroxisomes via the vacuole, when organelles become damaged or redundant. In the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha, pexophagy is stimulated when cells growing on methanol are exposed to excess glucose. Degradation of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3p, a process that does not involve the vacuole, was shown to trigger pexophagy. In this contribution, we have characterised pexophagy-associated Pex3p degradation further. We show that Pex3p breakdown depends on ubiquitin and confirm that Pex3p is a target for ubiquitination. Furthermore, we identify a role for the peroxisomal E3 ligases Pex2p and Pex10p in Pex3p degradation, suggesting the existence of a ubiquitin-dependent pathway involved in removing proteins from the peroxisomal membrane.     

Atg36: The Saccharomyces cerevisiae receptor for pexophagy

Eukaryotic cells adapt their organelle composition and abundance according to environmental conditions. Analysis of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3 has revealed that this protein plays a crucial role in peroxisome maintenance as it is required for peroxisome formation, segregation and breakdown. Although its function in peroxisome formation and segregation was known to involve its recruitment to the peroxisomal membrane of factors specific for these processes, the role of Pex3 in peroxisome breakdown was unclear until our recent identification of Atg36 as a novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pex3-interacting protein. Atg36 is recruited to peroxisomes by Pex3 and is required specifically for pexophagy. Atg36 is distinct from Atg30, the pexophagy receptor identified in Pichia pastoris. Atg36 interacts with Atg11 in vivo, and to a lesser extent with Atg8. These latter proteins link autophagic cargo receptors to the core autophagy machinery. Like other autophagic cargo receptors, Atg36 is a suicide receptor and is broken down in the vacuole together with its cargo. Unlike other cargo receptors, the interaction between Atg36 and Atg8 does not seem to be direct. Our recent findings suggest that Atg36 is a novel pexophagy receptor that may target peroxisomes for degradation via a noncanonical mechanism.     

Peroxisomal Pex3 Activates Selective Autophagy of Peroxisomes via Interaction with the Pexophagy Receptor Atg30

Pexophagy is a process that selectively degrades peroxisomes by autophagy. The Pichia pastoris pexophagy receptor Atg30 is recruited to peroxisomes under peroxisome proliferation conditions. During pexophagy, Atg30 undergoes phosphorylation, a prerequisite for its interactions with the autophagy scaffold protein Atg11 and the ubiquitin-like protein Atg8. Atg30 is subsequently shuttled to the vacuole along with the targeted peroxisome for degradation. Here, we defined the binding site for Atg30 on the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3 and uncovered a role for Pex3 in the activation of Atg30 via phosphorylation and in the recruitment of Atg11 to the receptor protein complex. Pex3 is classically a docking protein for other proteins that affect peroxisome biogenesis, division, and segregation. We conclude that Pex3 has a role beyond simple docking of Atg30 and that its interaction with Atg30 regulates pexophagy in the yeast P. pastoris.     

Pex14p is Not Required for Microautophagy and in Catalytic Amounts for Macropexophagy in Hansenula polymorpha

We showed before that the two oppositely directed processes of peroxisome biogenesis and selective peroxisome degradation (macropexophagy) converge at the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex14p. Here we show that this protein is not required for peroxisomal degradation during nitrogen starvation-induced general autophagy, thereby limiting its function to the selective degradation process. Pex14p is present in two forms, namely an unmodified (Pex14p) and a phosphorylated form (Pex14p^Pi) that are differently induced during peroxisome proliferation. The data suggest that Pex14p is required for peroxisome biogenesis during organelle proliferation and Pex14p^Pi in macropexophagy. Finally, we show that macropexophagy is not coupled to normal peroxisome assembly and is required in only catalytic amounts to allow initiation of the selective peroxisome degradation process.     

Insights into the Role of the Peroxisomal Ubiquitination Machinery in Pex13p Degradation in the Yeast Hansenula polymorpha

The import of matrix proteins into peroxisomes in yeast requires the action of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Pex4p and a complex consisting of the ubiquitin E3 ligases Pex2p, Pex10p and Pex12p. Together, this peroxisomal ubiquitination machinery is thought to ubiquitinate the cycling receptor protein Pex5p and members of the Pex20p family of co-receptors, a modification that is required for receptor recycling. However, recent reports have demonstrated that this machinery plays a role in additional peroxisome-associated processes. Hence, our understanding of the function of these proteins in peroxisome biology is still incomplete. Here, we identify a role for the peroxisomal ubiquitination machinery in the degradation of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex13p. Our data demonstrate that Pex13p levels build up in cells lacking members of this machinery and also establish that Pex13p undergoes rapid degradation in wild-type cells. Furthermore, we show that Pex13p is ubiquitinated in wild-type cells and also establish that Pex13p ubiquitination is reduced in cells lacking a functional peroxisomal E3 ligase complex. Finally, deletion of PEX2 causes Pex13p to build up at the peroxisomal membrane. Taken together, our data provide further evidence that the role of the peroxisomal ubiquitination machinery in peroxisome biology goes much deeper than receptor recycling alone.     

Peroxisome biogenesis and selective degradation converge at Pex14p

We have analyzed the function of Hansenula polymorpha Pex14p in selective peroxisome degradation. Previously, we showed that Pex14p was involved in peroxisome biogenesis and functions in peroxisome matrix protein import. Evidence for the additional function of HpPex14p in selective peroxisome degradation (pexophagy) came from cells defective in HpPex14p synthesis. The suggestion that the absence of HpPex14p interfered with pexophagy was further analyzed by mutational analysis. These studies indicated that deletions at the C terminus of up to 124 amino acids of HpPex14p did not affect peroxisome degradation. Conversely, short deletions of the N terminus (31 and 64 amino acids, respectively) of the protein fully impaired pexophagy. Peroxisomes present in these cells remained intact for at least 6 h of incubation in the presence of excess glucose, conditions that led to the rapid turnover of the organelles in wild-type control cells. We conclude that the N terminus of HpPex14p contains essential information to control pexophagy in H. polymorpha and thus, that organelle development and turnover converge at Pex14p.     

Pex14p is not required for N-starvation induced microautophagy and in catalytic amounts for macropexophagy in Hansenula polymorpha

We showed before that the two oppositely directed processes of peroxisome biogenesis and selective peroxisome degradation (macropexophagy) converge at the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex14p. Here we show that this protein is not required for peroxisome degradation during nitrogen starvation-induced general autophagy, thereby limiting its function to the selective degradation process. Pex14p is present in two forms, namely an unmodified (Pex14p) and a phosphorylated form (Pex14p(Pi)) that are differently induced during peroxisome proliferation. The data suggest that Pex14p is required for peroxisome biogenesis during organelle proliferation and Pex14p(Pi) in macropexophagy. Finally, we show that macropexophagy is not coupled to normal peroxisome assembly, because Pex14p is required in only catalytic amounts to allow initiation of the selective peroxisome degradation process.     

An ER‐peroxisome tether exerts peroxisome population control in yeast

Eukaryotic cells compartmentalize biochemical reactions into membrane‐enclosed organelles that must be faithfully propagated from one cell generation to the next. Transport and retention processes balance the partitioning of organelles between mother and daughter cells. Here we report the identification of an ER‐peroxisome tether that links peroxisomes to the ER and ensures peroxisome population control in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The tether consists of the peroxisome biogenic protein, Pex3p, and the peroxisome inheritance factor, Inp1p. Inp1p bridges the two compartments by acting as a molecular hinge between ER‐bound Pex3p and peroxisomal Pex3p. Asymmetric peroxisome division leads to the formation of Inp1p‐containing anchored peroxisomes and Inp1p‐deficient mobile peroxisomes that segregate to the bud. While peroxisomes in mother cells are not released from tethering, de novo formation of tethers in the bud assists in the directionality of peroxisome transfer. Peroxisomes are thus stably maintained over generations of cells through their continued interaction with tethers.     

Pexophagy is responsible for 65% of cases of peroxisome biogenesis disorders

Peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBDs) is a group of diseases caused by mutations in one of the peroxins, proteins responsible for biogenesis of the peroxisomes. In recent years, it became clear that many peroxins (e.g., PEX3 and PEX14) play additional roles in peroxisome homeostasis (such as promoting autophagic degradation of peroxisomes or pexophagy), which are often opposite to their originally established functions in peroxisome formation and maintenance. Even more interesting, the peroxins that make up the peroxisomal AAA ATPase complex (AAA-complex) in yeast (Pex1, Pex6 and Pex15) or mammals (PEX1, PEX6, PEX26) are responsible for the downregulation of pexophagy. Moreover, this might be even their primary role in human: to prevent pexophagy by removing from the peroxisomal membrane the ubiquitinated peroxisomal matrix protein import receptor, Ub-PEX5, which is also a signal for the Ub-binding pexophagy receptor, NBR1. Remarkably, the peroxisomes rescued from pexophagy by autophagic inhibitors in PEX1^G843D (the most common PBD mutation) cells are able to import matrix proteins and improve their biochemical function suggesting that the AAA-complex per se is not essential for the protein import function in human. This paradigm-shifting discovery published in the current issue of Autophagy has raised hope for up to 65% of all PBD patients with various deficiencies in the AAA-complex. Recognizing PEX1, PEX6 and PEX26 as pexophagy suppressors will allow treating these patients with a new range of tools designed to target mammalian pexophagy.     

Deficiency of the exportomer components Pex1, Pex6, and Pex15 causes enhanced pexophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Turnover of damaged, dysfunctional, or excess organelles is critical to cellular homeostasis. We screened mutants disturbed in peroxisomal protein import, and found that a deficiency in the exportomer subunits Pex1, Pex6, and Pex15 results in enhanced turnover of peroxisomal membrane structures compared with other mutants. Strikingly, almost all peroxisomal membranes were associated with phagophore assembly sites in pex1Δ atg1Δ cells. Degradation depended on Atg11 and the pexophagy receptor Atg36, which mediates degradation of superfluous peroxisomes. Mutants of PEX1, PEX6, and PEX15 accumulate ubiquitinated receptors at the peroxisomal membrane. This accumulation has been suggested to trigger pexophagy in mammalian cells. We show by genetic analysis that preventing this accumulation does not abolish pexophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find Atg36 is modified in pex1Δ cells even when Atg11 binding is prevented, suggesting Atg36 modification is an early event in the degradation of dysfunctional peroxisomal structures in pex1Δ cells via pexophagy.     

Peroxisome development in yeast is associated with the formation of Pex3-dependent peroxisome-vacuole contact sites

Using electron and fluorescence microscopy techniques, we identified various physical contacts between peroxisomes and other cell organelles in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha.In exponential glucose-grown cells, which typically contain a single small peroxisome, contacts were only observed with the endoplasmic reticulum and the plasma membrane. Here we focus on a novel peroxisome-vacuole contact site that is formed when glucose-grown cells are shifted to methanol containing media, conditions that induce strong peroxisome development. At these conditions, the small peroxisomes rapidly increase in size, a phenomenon that is paralleled by the formation of distinct intimate contacts with the vacuole.Localization studies showed that the peroxin Pex3 accumulated in patches at the peroxisome-vacuole contact sites. In wild-type cells growing exponentially on medium containing glucose, peroxisome-vacuole contact sites were never observed. However, upon overproduction of Pex3 peroxisomes also associated to vacuoles at these growth conditions.Our observations strongly suggest a role for Pex3 in the formation of a novel peroxisome-vacuole contact site. This contact likely plays a role in membrane growth as it is formed solely at conditions of strong peroxisome expansion.     

Obstruction of polyubiquitination affects PTS1 peroxisomal matrix protein import

Pex4p is an ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme that functions at a late stage of peroxisomal matrix protein import. Here we show that in the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha production of a mutant form of ubiquitin (Ub(K48R)) has a dramatic effect on PTS1 matrix protein import. This effect was not observed in cells lacking Pex4p, in which the peroxisome biogenesis defect was largely suppressed. These findings provide the first indication that the function of Pex4p in matrix protein import involves polyubiquitination. We also demonstrate that the production of Ub(K48R) in H. polymorpha results in enhanced Pex5p degradation. A similar observation was made in cells in which the PEX4 gene was deleted. We demonstrate that in both strains Pex5p degradation was due to ubiquitination and subsequent degradation by the proteasome. This process appeared to be dependent on a conserved lysine residue in the N-terminus of Pex5p (Lys21) and was prevented in a Pex5p(K21R) mutant. We speculate that the degradation of Pex5p by the proteasome is important to remove receptor molecules that are stuck at a late stage of the Pex5p-mediated protein import pathway.     

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p is monoubiquitinated in wild type cells

Pex5p is a mobile receptor for peroxisomal targeting signal type I-containing proteins that cycles between the cytoplasm and the peroxisome. Here we show that Pex5p is a stable protein that is monoubiquitinated in wild type cells. By making use of mutants defective in vacuolar or proteasomal degradation we demonstrate that monoubiquitinated Pex5p is not a breakdown intermediate of either system. Monoubiquitinated Pex5p is localized to peroxisomes, and ubiquitination requires the presence of functional docking and RING finger complexes, which suggests that it is a late event in peroxisomal matrix protein import. In pex1, pex4, pex6, pex15, and pex22 mutants, all of which are blocked in the terminal steps of peroxisomal matrix protein import, polyubiquitinated forms of Pex5p accumulate, ubiquitination being dependent on the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc4p. However, Ubc4p is not required for Pex5p ubiquitination in wild type cells, and cells lacking Ubc4p are not affected in peroxisome biogenesis. These results indicate that Pex5p monoubiquitination in wild type cells serves to regulate rather than to degrade Pex5p, which is supported by the observed stability of Pex5p. We propose that Pex5p monoubiquitination in wild type cells is required for the recycling of Pex5p from the peroxisome, whereas Ubc4p-mediated polyubiquitination of Pex5p in mutants blocked in the terminal steps of peroxisomal matrix protein import may function as a disposal mechanism for Pex5p when it gets stuck in the import pathway.     

The peroxin Pex34p functions with the Pex11 family of peroxisomal divisional proteins to regulate the peroxisome population in yeast

Peroxisomes are ubiquitous organelles involved in diverse metabolic processes, most notably the metabolism of lipids and the detoxification of reactive oxygen species. Peroxisomes are highly dynamic and change in size and number in response to both intra- and extracellular cues. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, peroxisome growth and division are controlled by both the differential import of soluble matrix proteins and a specialized divisional machinery that includes peroxisome-specific factors, such as members of the Pex11 protein family, and general organelle divisional factors, such as the dynamin-related protein Vps1p. Global yeast two-hybrid analyses have demonstrated interactions between the product of the S. cerevisiae gene of unknown function, YCL056c, and Pex proteins involved in peroxisome biogenesis. Here we show that the protein encoded by YCL056c, renamed Pex34p, is a peroxisomal integral membrane protein that acts independently and also in concert with the Pex11 protein family members Pex11p, Pex25p, and Pex27p to control the peroxisome populations of cells under conditions of both peroxisome proliferation and constitutive peroxisome division. Yeast two-hybrid analysis showed that Pex34p interacts physically with itself and with Pex11p, Pex25p, and Pex27p but not with Vps1p. Pex34p can act as a positive effector of peroxisome division as its overexpression leads to increased numbers of peroxisomes in wild type and pex34Δ cells. Pex34p requires the Pex11 family proteins to promote peroxisome division. Our discovery of Pex34p as a protein involved in the already complex control of peroxisome populations emphasizes the necessity of cells to strictly regulate their peroxisome populations to be able to respond appropriately to changing environmental conditions.