Functional Analyses of the Plant Photosystem I-Light-Harvesting Complex II Supercomplex Reveal That Light-Harvesting Complex II Loosely Bound to Photosystem II Is a Very Efficient Antenna for Photosystem I in State II

State transitions are an important photosynthetic short-term response that allows energy distribution balancing between photosystems I (PSI) and II (PSII). In plants when PSII is preferentially excited compared with PSI (State II), part of the major light-harvesting complex LHCII migrates to PSI to form a PSI-LHCII supercomplex. So far, little is known about this complex, mainly due to purification problems. Here, a stable PSI-LHCII supercomplex is purified from Arabidopsis thaliana and maize (Zea mays) plants. It is demonstrated that LHCIIs loosely bound to PSII in State I are the trimers mainly involved in state transitions and become strongly bound to PSI in State II. Specific Lhcb1-3 isoforms are differently represented in the mobile LHCII compared with S and M trimers. Fluorescence analyses indicate that excitation energy migration from mobile LHCII to PSI is rapid and efficient, and the quantum yield of photochemical conversion of PSI-LHCII is substantially unaffected with respect to PSI, despite a sizable increase of the antenna size. An updated PSI-LHCII structural model suggests that the low-energy chlorophylls 611 and 612 in LHCII interact with the chlorophyll 11145 at the interface of PSI. In contrast with the common opinion, we suggest that the mobile pool of LHCII may be considered an intimate part of the PSI antenna system that is displaced to PSII in State I.     

Processing of the Precursors for the Light-Harvesting Chlorophyll-Binding Proteins of Photosystem II and Photosystem I during Import and in an Organelle-Free Assay

We have investigated whether the precursors for the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding proteins (LHCP) of photosystems II and I (PSII and PSI) are cleavable substrates in an organelle-free reaction, and have compared the products with those obtained during in vitro import into chloroplasts. Representatives from the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) LHCP family were analyzed. The precursor for LHCP type I of PSII (pLHCPII-1), encoded by the tomato gene Cab3C, was cleaved at only one site in the organelle-free assay, but two sites were recognized during import, analogous to our earlier results with a wheat precursor for LHCPII-1. The relative abundance of the two peptides produced was investigated during import of pLHCPII-1 into chloroplasts isolated from plants greened for 2 or 24 hours. In contrast to pLHCPII-1, the precursors for LHCP type II and III of PSI were cleaved in both assays, giving rise to a single peptide. The precursor for LHCP type I of PSI, encoded by gene Cab6A, yielded two peptides of 23.5 and 21.5 kilodaltons during import, whereas in the organelle-free assay only the 23.5 kilodalton peptide was found. N-terminal sequence analysis of this radiolabeled peptide has tentatively identified the site cleaved in the organelle-free assay between met40 and ser41 of the precursor.     

Cyanobacterial Acclimation to Photosystem I or Photosystem II Light

The organization and function of the photochemical apparatus of Synechococcus 6301 was investigated in cells grown under yellow and red light regimes. Broadband yellow illumination is absorbed preferentially by the phycobilisome (PBS) whereas red light is absorbed primarily by the chlorophyll (Chl) pigment beds. Since PBSs are associated exclusively with photosystem II (PSII) and most of the Chl with photosystem I (PSI), it follows that yellow and red light regimes will create an imbalance of light absorption by the two photosystems. The cause and effect relationship between light quality and photosystem stoichiometry in Synechococcus was investigated. Cells grown under red light compensated for the excitation imbalance by synthesis/assembly of more PBS-PSII complexes resulting in high PSII/PSI = 0.71 and high bilin/Chl = 1.30. The adjustment of the photosystem stoichiometry in red light-grown cells was necessary and sufficient to establish an overall balanced absorption of red light by PSII and PSI. Cells grown under yellow light compensated for this excitation imbalance by assembly of more PSI complexes, resulting in low PSII/PSI = 0.27 and low bilin/Chl = 0.42. This adjustment of the photosystem stoichiometry in yellow light-grown cells was necessary but not quite sufficient to balance the absorption of yellow light by the PBS and the Chl pigment beds. A novel excitation quenching process was identified in yellow light-grown cells which dissipated approximately 40% of the PBS excitation, thus preventing over-excitation of PSII under yellow light conditions. It is hypothesized that State transitions in O₂ evolving photosynthetic organisms may serve as the signal for change in the stoichiometry of photochemical complexes in response to light quality conditions.     

Organization of the Light-Harvesting Complex of Photosystem I and Its Assembly during Plastid Development

Photosystem I (PSI) holocomplexes were fractionated to study the organization of the light-harvesting complex I (LHC I) pigment-proteins in barley (Hordeum vulgare) plastids. LHC Ia and LHC Ib can be isolated as oligomeric, presumably trimeric, pigment-protein complexes. The LHC Ia oligomeric complex contains both the 24- and the 21.5-kD apoproteins encoded by the Lhca3 and Lhca2 genes and is slightly larger than the oligomeric LHC Ib complex containing the Lhca1 and Lhca4 gene products of 21 and 20 kD. The synthesis and assembly of LHC I during light-driven development of intermittent light-grown plants occurs rapidly upon exposure to continuous illumination. Complete PSI complexes are detected by nondenaturing Deriphat (disodium N-dodecyl-[beta]-iminodipropionate-160)-PAGE after 2 h of illumination, and their appearance correlates with that of the 730- to 740-nm emission characteristic of assembled LHC I. However, the majority of the newly synthesized LHC I apoproteins are present as monomeric complexes in the thylakoids during the early hours of greening. We propose that during development of the protochloroplast the LHC I apoproteins are first assembled into monomeric pigmented complexes that then aggregate into trimers before becoming attached to the pre-existing core complex to form a complete PSI holocomplex.     

Phosphorylation of the Light-Harvesting Complex II Isoform Lhcb2 Is Central to State Transitions

Light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) is a crucial component of the photosynthetic machinery, with central roles in light capture and acclimation to changing light. The association of an LHCII trimer with PSI in the PSI-LHCII supercomplex is strictly dependent on LHCII phosphorylation mediated by the kinase STATE TRANSITION7, and is directly related to the light acclimation process called state transitions. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the LHCII trimers contain isoforms that belong to three classes: Lhcb1, Lhcb2, and Lhcb3. Only Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 can be phosphorylated in the N-terminal region. Here, we present an improved Phos-tag-based method to determine the absolute extent of phosphorylation of Lhcb1 and Lhcb2. Both classes show very similar phosphorylation kinetics during state transition. Nevertheless, only Lhcb2 is extensively phosphorylated (>98%) in PSI-LHCII, whereas phosphorylated Lhcb1 is largely excluded from this supercomplex. Both isoforms are phosphorylated to different extents in other photosystem supercomplexes and in different domains of the thylakoid membranes. The data imply that, despite their high sequence similarity, differential phosphorylation of Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 plays contrasting roles in light acclimation of photosynthesis.Light capture and its conversion to chemical energy occur in a set of transmembrane protein complexes of the thylakoid membrane. PSII, the cytochrome b₆f complex, and PSI drive photosynthetic electron flow and the creation of a proton gradient across the thylakoid membrane. ATP synthase couples the dissipation of this gradient to the synthesis of ATP. The light-harvesting antennae play an important role in collecting light and transferring energy to the photosystems. Light-Harvesting Complex I (LHCI) exclusively transfers light energy to PSI, with which it is tightly associated (Croce and van Amerongen, 2014). In contrast, LHCII, which is the most abundant complex of the thylakoid membrane, can transfer energy to PSI or PSII (Grieco et al., 2015). Light is highly variable in natural environments, and plants experience continuous changes in both the spectrum and intensity of light on timescales as short as seconds. Changes in light quality may unbalance the activity of the two photosystems since their absorption spectra differ, whereas high light intensity can lead to overexcitation and induce photodamage. At low or moderate light intensities, the LHCII complex differentially associates with PSII or PSI, in a phosphorylation-dependent process known as state transitions, to rapidly respond to changes in the spectrum of light. In brief, under light quality that activates PSII more than PSI (e.g. blue light), LHCII is phosphorylated, and as a consequence, its binding to PSI is favored (state 2). Conversely, under light that preferentially excites PSI (enriched in far-red), this association can be reverted by dephosphorylation of the LHCII antenna, which favors its binding to PSII (state 1; Goldschmidt-Clermont and Bassi, 2015; Kim et al., 2015). A protein kinase, STATE TRANSITION7 (STN7), and a protein phosphatase, PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE1 (PPH1)/THYLAKOID-ASSOCIATED PHOSPHATASE38 (TAP38), are essential for the rapid phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the LHCII antenna that regulates its differential association to PSI or PSII (Bellafiore et al., 2005; Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010). Only a relatively small fraction of the LHCII antenna (<20%) is estimated to participate in state transitions in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Allen, 1992). However, the process is conserved across the green eukaryotes and is relevant to plant fitness (Frenkel et al., 2007). Under high light, energy-dependent quenching of LHCII predominates, and furthermore, this antenna can uncouple from PSII (Wientjes et al., 2013b).The differential association of photosystems, LHCII, and other components of the thylakoid membrane gives rise to a set of supercomplexes that are central in ensuring photosynthetic efficiency and a rapid response to environmental cues (Caffarri et al., 2009; Duffy et al., 2013; Pietrzykowska et al., 2014; Fristedt et al., 2015). Fine tuning the dynamic assembly of these supercomplexes involves the association of antennae containing specific sets of Lhcb proteins. The major LHCII antenna comprises homo- and heterotrimers of Lhcb1 to Lhcb3 (Jackowski et al., 2001), whereas the minor LHCII isoforms (Lhcb4–Lhcb6) are monomeric (de Bianchi et al., 2008). Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 share a very similar primary structure and associated pigments (Formaggio et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2008), whereas Lhcb3 appears to have slightly different features (Standfuss and Kühlbrandt, 2004). In Arabidopsis, five genes encode Lhcb1 isoforms, three genes encode Lhcb2 isoforms, and a single gene encodes Lhcb3. The principal discriminant between these classes is a short stretch of residues at the N-terminal end, which is of particular importance since it contains the Thr that is reversibly phosphorylated during light-acclimation processes (Goldschmidt-Clermont and Bassi, 2015). During evolution, land plants have maintained a major LHCII composed of different classes of Lhcb subunits. The phosphorylated N terminus of Lhcb2 was particularly well conserved (Alboresi et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2008).PSII-LHCII supercomplexes have been isolated from Arabidopsis with up to four LHCII trimers bound to a PSII dimer, as well as the three minor monomeric antennae (Lhcb4–Lhcb6; Caffarri et al., 2009; Kouřil et al., 2012). In the LHCII trimers of these supercomplexes, different classes of Lhcb subunits are distributed differently, suggesting a specific role in light acclimation for each of them (Damkjaer et al., 2009; Pietrzykowska et al., 2014). In the stably bound S trimer, Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 are more abundant, whereas the moderately bound M trimer contains mostly Lhcb1 and Lhcb3 (Galka et al., 2012). PSII supercomplexes isolated from spinach (Spinacia oleracea) showed the presence of an extra LHCII trimer (L trimer); therefore, it is possible that, in Arabidopsis, other trimers are associated with the PSII dimer in a more labile supercomplex that cannot be isolated (Boekema et al., 1999). A single LHCII trimer, containing Lhcb1 and Lhcb2, stably associates with PSI to constitute the PSI-LHCII supercomplex, whose formation is dependent on LHCII phosphorylation by STN7 in state 2 (Kouřil et al., 2005; Galka et al., 2012).Previous reports have shown that the relative phosphorylation of Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 isoforms differs among thylakoid supercomplexes (Galka et al., 2012; Leoni et al., 2013). Here, we address the specific roles of Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 phosphorylation in photosynthetic acclimation. The improved protocol for SDS-PAGE in the presence of Phos-tag (Wako Chemicals) that we present allows quantification of the extent of phosphorylation for each class of antenna isoforms. We report that, in the PSI-LHCII supercomplex that is assembled in state 2, only the phosphorylated form of Lhcb2 is present, whereas the phosphorylated form of Lhcb1 is excluded. In contrast, both Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 are phosphorylated to different levels in other supercomplexes. This quantitative information on the level of phosphorylation of Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 offers new insights into the specific roles of the two classes of LHCII isoforms in light acclimation and supercomplex formation.     

Isolation and Characterization of a Light-Harvesting Chlorophyll a/b Protein Complex Associated with Photosystem I

A chlorophyll a/b protein complex has been isolated from a resolved native photosystem I complex by mildly dissociating sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The chlorophyll a/b protein contains a single polypeptide of molecular weight 20 kilodaltons, and has a chlorophyll a/b ratio of 3.5 to 4.0. The visible absorbance spectrum of the chlorophyll a/b protein complex showed a maximum at 667 nanometers in the red region and a 77 K fluorescence emission maximum at 681 nanometers. Alternatively, by treatment of the native photosystem I complex with lithium dodecyl sulfate and Triton, the chlorophyll a/b protein complex could be isolated by chromatography on Sephadex G-75. Immunological assays using antibodies to the P₇₀₀-chlorophyll a-protein and the photosystem II light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein show no cross-reaction between the photosystem I chlorophyll a/b protein and the other two chlorophyll-containing protein complexes.     

Subunit Proteins of Photosystem I

Photosystem I (PS I) is a supramolecular complex in thylakoidmembranes and mediates the light-driven electron flow from plastocyanin(or cytochrome c₅₅₃) to ferredoxin. It has been establishedthat the PS I complex consists of more than 10 different subunitproteins that ligate 100 to 200 molecules of chlorophylls includingP700, two molecules of phylloquinone and three iron-sulfur centers(F_X, F_A, F_B). The identity and properties of these PS I subunitproteins have been extensively studied, and their genes haverecently been cloned and mutagenized. The current status ofthese investigations is summarized. (Received May 8, 1992; )     

Photosystem II Excitation Pressure and Development of Resistance to Photoinhibition (I. Light-Harvesting Complex II Abundance and Zeaxanthin Content in Chlorella vulgaris)

The basis of the increased resistance to photoinhibition upon growth at low temperature was investigated. Photosystem II (PSII) excitation pressure was estimated in vivo as 1 - qp (photochemical quenching). We established that Chlorella vulgaris exposed to either 5[deg]C/150 [mu]mol m-2 s-1 or 27[deg]C/2200 [mu]mol m-2 s-1 experienced a high PSII excitation pressure of 0.70 to 0.75. In contrast, Chlorella exposed to either 27[deg]C/150 [mu]mol m-2 s-1 or 5[deg]C/20 [mu]mol m-2 s-1 experienced a low PSII excitation pressure of 0.10 to 0.20. Chlorella grown under either regime at high PSII excitation pressure exhibited: (a) 3-fold higher light-saturated rates of O2 evolution; (b) the complete conversion of PSII[alpha] centers to PSII[beta] centers; (c) a 3-fold lower epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle intermediates; (d) a 2.4-fold higher ratio of chlorophyll a/b; and (e) a lower abundance of light-harvesting polypeptides than Chlorella grown at either regime at low PSII excitation pressure. In addition, cells grown at 5[deg]C/150 [mu]mol m-2 s-1 exhibited resistance to photoinhibition comparable to that of cells grown at 27[deg]C/2200 [mu]mol m-2 s-1 and were 3- to 4-fold more resistant to photoinhibition than cells grown at either regime at low excitation pressure. We conclude that increased resistance to photoinhibition upon growth at low temperature reflects photosynthetic adjustment to high excitation pressure, which results in an increased capacity for nonradiative dissipation of excess light through zeaxanthin coupled with a lower probability of light absorption due to reduced chlorophyll per cell and decreased abundance of light-harvesting polypeptides.     

Relation between the Light-Harvesting Chlorophyll a-Protein Complex LHCPa and Photosystem I in the Alga Chlamydobotrys stellata

The light-harvesting chlorophyll protein system of the alga Chlamydobotrys stellata consists of an as yet uncharacterized algal chlorophyll a-protein, called LHCPa, and a common photosystem II-related chlorophyll a/b-protein, called LHCPb (Brandt, Kaiser-Jarry, Wiessner 1982 Biochim Biophys Acta 679: 404-409). For further characterization, this LHCPa was isolated from the organism by polyacrylamide isoelectrofocusing and reelectrophoresis. It contains only chlorophyll a and has only one apoprotein (32,000 daltons). When separated from autotrophically grown cells, its absorption peak is at 674 nm and its isoelectric point at 5.3. Photoheterotrophic cultivation of the algae shifts the absorption maximum of LHCPa to 679 nm and its isoelectric point to 4.8. This LHCPa is a component of photosystem I particles. In relation to the total chlorophyll a content, the amount of LHCPa is low in autotrophic algae, but increases under photoheterotrophic growth conditions, where the organisms do not have the ability to assimilate CO₂ photosynthetically.     

Light-Harvesting Features Revealed by the Structure of Plant Photosystem I

Oxygenic photosynthesis is driven by two multi-subunit membrane protein complexes, Photosystem I and Photosystem II. In plants and green algae, both complexes are composed of two moieties: a reaction center (RC), where light-induced charge translocation occurs, and a peripheral antenna that absorbs light and funnels its energy to the reaction center. The peripheral antenna of PS I (LHC I) is composed of four gene products (Lhca 1-4) that are unique among the chlorophyll a/b binding proteins in their pronounced long-wavelength absorbance and in their assembly into dimers. The recently determined structure of plant Photosystem I provides the first relatively high-resolution structural model of a super-complex containing a reaction center and its peripheral antenna. We describe some of the structural features responsible for the unique properties of LHC I and discuss the advantages of the particular LHC I dimerization mode over monomeric or trimeric forms. In addition, we delineate some of the interactions between the peripheral antenna and the reaction center and discuss how they serve the purpose of dynamically altering the composition of LHC I in response to environmental pressure. Combining structural insight with spectroscopic data, we propose how altering LHC I composition may protect PS I from excessive light.     

Growth under Red Light Enhances Photosystem II Relative to Photosystem I and Phycobilisomes in the Red Alga Porphyridium cruentum

Acclimation of the photosynthetic apparatus to light absorbed primarily by photosystem I (PSI) or by photosystem II (PSII) was studied in the unicellular red alga Porphyridium cruentum (ATCC 50161). Cultures grown under green light of 15 microeinsteins per square meter per second (PSII light; absorbed predominantly by the phycobilisomes) exhibited a PSII/PSI ratio of 0.26 ± 0.05. Under red light (PSI light; absorbed primarily by chlorophyll) of comparable quantum flux, cells contained nearly five times as many PSII per PSI (1.21 ± 0.10), and three times as many PSII per cell. About 12% of the chlorophyll was attributed to PSII in green light, 22% in white light, and 39% in red light-grown cultures. Chlorophyll antenna sizes appeared to remain constant at about 75 chlorophyll per PSII and 140 per PSI. Spectral quality had little effect on cell content or composition of the phycobilisomes, thus the number of PSII per phycobilisome was substantially greater in red light-grown cultures (4.2 ± 0.6) than in those grown under green (1.6 ± 0.3) or white light (2.9 ± 0.1). Total photosystems (PSI + PSII) per phycobilisome remained at about eight in each case. Carotenoid content and composition was little affected by the spectral composition of the growth light. Zeaxanthin comprised more than 50% (mole/mole), β-carotene about 40%, and cryptoxanthin about 4% of the carotenoid pigment. Despite marked changes in the light-harvesting apparatus, red and green light-grown cultures have generation times equal to that of cultures grown under white light of only one-third the quantum flux.     

Thylakoid Protein Phosphorylation in Higher Plant Chloroplasts Optimizes Electron Transfer under Fluctuating Light

Several proteins of photosystem II (PSII) and its light-harvesting antenna (LHCII) are reversibly phosphorylated according to light quantity and quality. Nevertheless, the interdependence of protein phosphorylation, nonphotochemical quenching, and efficiency of electron transfer in the thylakoid membrane has remained elusive. These questions were addressed by investigating in parallel the wild type and the stn7, stn8, and stn7 stn8 kinase mutants of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), using the stn7 npq4, npq4, npq1, and pgr5 mutants as controls. Phosphorylation of PSII-LHCII proteins is strongly and dynamically regulated according to white light intensity. Yet, the changes in phosphorylation do not notably modify the relative excitation energy distribution between PSII and PSI, as typically occurs when phosphorylation is induced by “state 2” light that selectively excites PSII and induces the phosphorylation of both the PSII core and LHCII proteins. On the contrary, under low-light conditions, when excitation energy transfer from LHCII to reaction centers is efficient, the STN7-dependent LHCII protein phosphorylation guarantees a balanced distribution of excitation energy to both photosystems. The importance of this regulation diminishes at high light upon induction of thermal dissipation of excitation energy. Lack of the STN7 kinase, and thus the capacity for equal distribution of excitation energy to PSII and PSI, causes relative overexcitation of PSII under low light but not under high light, leading to disturbed maintenance of fluent electron flow under fluctuating light intensities. The physiological relevance of the STN7-dependent regulation is evidenced by severely stunted phenotypes of the stn7 and stn7 stn8 mutants under strongly fluctuating light conditions.Several proteins of PSII and its light-harvesting antenna (LHCII) are reversibly phosphorylated by the STN7 and STN8 kinase-dependent pathways according to the intensity and quality of light (Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005). The best-known phosphorylation-dependent phenomenon in the thylakoid membrane is the state transition: a regulatory mechanism that modulates the light-harvesting capacity between PSII and PSI. According to the traditional view, “state 1” prevails when plants are exposed to far-red light (state 1 light), which selectively excites PSI. Alternatively, thylakoids are in “state 2” when plants are exposed to blue or red light (state 2 light), favoring PSII excitation. In state 1, the yield of fluorescence from PSII is higher in comparison with state 2 (for review, see Allen and Forsberg, 2001). State transitions are dependent on the phosphorylation of LHCII proteins (Bellafiore et al., 2005) and their association with PSI proteins, particularly PSI-H (Lunde et al., 2000). Under state 2 light, both the PSII core and LHCII proteins are strongly phosphorylated, whereas the state 1 light induces dephosphorylation of both the PSII core and LHCII phosphoproteins (Piippo et al., 2006; Tikkanen et al., 2006). In nature, however, such extreme changes in light quality rarely occur. The intensity of light, on the contrary, fluctuates frequently in all natural habitats occupied by photosynthetic organisms, thus constantly modulating the extent of thylakoid protein phosphorylation in a highly dynamic manner (Tikkanen et al., 2008a).The regulation of PSII-LHCII protein phosphorylation by the quantity of light is much more complex than the regulatory circuits induced by the state 1 and state 2 lights. Whereas changes in light quality induce a concurrent increase or decrease in the phosphorylation levels of both the PSII core (D1, D2, and CP43) and LHCII (Lhcb1 and Lhcb2) proteins, the changes in white light intensity may influence the kinetics of PSII core and LHCII protein phosphorylation in higher plant chloroplasts even in opposite directions (Tikkanen et al., 2008a). Indeed, it is well documented that low light (LL; i.e. lower than that generally experienced during growth) induces strong phosphorylation of LHCII but relatively weak phosphorylation of the PSII core proteins. Exposure of plants to high light (HL) intensities, on the contrary, promotes the phosphorylation of PSII core proteins but inhibits the activity of the LHCII kinase, leading to dephosphorylation of LHCII proteins (Rintamäki et al., 2000; Hou et al., 2003).Thylakoid protein phosphorylation induces dynamic migrations of PSII-LHCII proteins along the thylakoid membrane (Bassi et al., 1988; Iwai et al., 2008) and modulation of thylakoid ultrastructure (Chuartzman et al., 2008). According to the traditional state transition theory, the phosphorylation of LHCII proteins decreases the antenna size of PSII and increases that of PSI, which is reflected as a quenched fluorescence emission from PSII. Alternatively, subsequent dephosphorylation of LHCII increases the antenna size of PSII and decreases that of PSI, which in turn is seen as increased PSII fluorescence (Bennett et al., 1980; Allen et al., 1981; Allen and Forsberg, 2001). This view was recently challenged based on studies with thylakoid membrane fractions, revealing that modulations in the relative distribution of excitation energy between PSII and PSI by LHCII phosphorylation specifically occur in the areas of grana margins, where both PSII and PSI function under the same antenna system, and the energy distribution between the photosystems is regulated via a more subtle mechanism than just the robust migration of phosphorylated LHCII (Tikkanen et al., 2008b). It has also been reported that most of the PSI reaction centers are located in the grana margins in a close vicinity to PSII-LHCII-rich grana thylakoids (Kaftan et al., 2002), providing a perfect framework for the regulation of excitation energy distribution from LHCII to both PSII and PSI.When considering the natural light conditions, the HL intensities are the only known light conditions that in higher plant chloroplasts specifically dephosphorylate only the LHCII proteins but not the PSII core proteins. However, such light conditions do not lead to enhanced function of PSII. Instead, the HL conditions strongly down-regulate the function of PSII via nonphotochemical quenching of excitation energy (NPQ) and PSII photoinhibition (for review, see Niyogi, 1999). On the other hand, after dark acclimation of leaves and relaxation of NPQ, PSII functions much more efficiently when plants/leaves are transferred to LL despite strong phosphorylation of LHCII, as compared with the low phosphorylation state of LHCII upon transfer to HL conditions.The delicate regulation of thylakoid protein phosphorylation in higher plant chloroplasts according to prevailing light intensity is difficult to integrate with the traditional theory of state transitions (i.e. the regulation of the absorption cross-section of PSII and PSI by reversible phosphorylation of LHCII). Moreover, besides LHCII proteins, reversible phosphorylation of the PSII core proteins may also play a role in dynamic light acclimation of plants. Recently, we demonstrated that the PSII core protein phosphorylation is a prerequisite for controlled turnover of the PSII reaction center protein D1 upon photodamage (Tikkanen et al., 2008a). This, however, does not exclude the possibility that the strict regulation of PSII core protein phosphorylation is also connected to the regulation of light harvesting and photosynthetic electron transfer. Moreover, the interactions between PSII and LHCII protein phosphorylation, nonphotochemical quenching, and cyclic electron flow around PSI in the regulation of photosynthetic electron transfer reactions remain poorly understood. To gain a deeper insight into such regulatory networks, we explored the effect of strongly fluctuating white light on chlorophyll (chl) fluorescence in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants differentially deficient in PSII-LHCII protein phosphorylation and/or the regulatory systems of NPQ.     

Light-Harvesting Complex Protein LHCBM9 Is Critical for Photosystem II Activity and Hydrogen Production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

Photosynthetic organisms developed multiple strategies for balancing light-harvesting versus intracellular energy utilization to survive ever-changing environmental conditions. The light-harvesting complex (LHC) protein family is of paramount importance for this function and can form light-harvesting pigment protein complexes. In this work, we describe detailed analyses of the photosystem II (PSII) LHC protein LHCBM9 of the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in terms of expression kinetics, localization, and function. In contrast to most LHC members described before, LHCBM9 expression was determined to be very low during standard cell cultivation but strongly increased as a response to specific stress conditions, e.g., when nutrient availability was limited. LHCBM9 was localized as part of PSII supercomplexes but was not found in association with photosystem I complexes. Knockdown cell lines with 50 to 70% reduced amounts of LHCBM9 showed reduced photosynthetic activity upon illumination and severe perturbation of hydrogen production activity. Functional analysis, performed on isolated PSII supercomplexes and recombinant LHCBM9 proteins, demonstrated that presence of LHCBM9 resulted in faster chlorophyll fluorescence decay and reduced production of singlet oxygen, indicating upgraded photoprotection. We conclude that LHCBM9 has a special role within the family of LHCII proteins and serves an important protective function during stress conditions by promoting efficient light energy dissipation and stabilizing PSII supercomplexes.     

Light Quality and Irradiance Level Interaction in the Control of Expression of Light-Harvesting Complex of Photosystem II: Pigments, Pigment-Proteins, and mRNA Accumulation

Effects of red and blue light at irradiances from 1.6 to 28.3 micromolar per square meter per second on chloroplast pigments, light-harvesting pigment-proteins associated with photosystem II, and the corresponding mRNA were evaluated in maize (Zea mays L.) plants (OP Golden Bantum) grown for 14 days under 14 hours light/10 hours dark cycles. Accumulation of pigments, pigment-proteins, and mRNA was less in blue than in red light of equal irradiance. The difference between blue and red light, however, varied as a function of irradiance level, and the pattern of this variation suggests irradiance-controlled activation/deactivation (switching) of blue-light receptor. The maximum reduction in blue light of mRNA and proteins associated with light-harvesting complex occurs at lower irradiance levels than the maximum reduction of chlorophylls a and b.     

The Photosystem II Light-Harvesting Protein Lhcb3 Affects the Macrostructure of Photosystem II and the Rate of State Transitions in Arabidopsis

The main trimeric light-harvesting complex of higher plants (LHCII) consists of three different Lhcb proteins (Lhcb1-3). We show that Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA knockout plants lacking Lhcb3 (koLhcb3) compensate for the lack of Lhcb3 by producing increased amounts of Lhcb1 and Lhcb2. As in wild-type plants, LHCII-photosystem II (PSII) supercomplexes were present in Lhcb3 knockout plants (koLhcb3), and preservation of the LHCII trimers (M trimers) indicates that the Lhcb3 in M trimers has been replaced by Lhcb1 and/or Lhcb2. However, the rotational position of the M LHCII trimer was altered, suggesting that the Lhcb3 subunit affects the macrostructural arrangement of the LHCII antenna. The absence of Lhcb3 did not result in any significant alteration in PSII efficiency or qE type of nonphotochemical quenching, but the rate of transition from State 1 to State 2 was increased in koLhcb3, although the final extent of state transition was unchanged. The level of phosphorylation of LHCII was increased in the koLhcb3 plants compared with wild-type plants in both State 1 and State 2. The relative increase in phosphorylation upon transition from State 1 to State 2 was also significantly higher in koLhcb3. It is suggested that the main function of Lhcb3 is to modulate the rate of state transitions.     

Colocalization of Polyphenol Oxidase and Photosystem II Proteins

Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) appears to be ubiquitous in higher plants but, as yet, no function has been ascribed to it. Herein, we report on the localization of PPO based upon biochemical fractionation of chloroplast membranes in Vicia faba (broad bean) into various complexes and immunocytochemical electron microscopic investigations. Sucrose density gradient fractionations of thylakoid membranes after detergent solubilization reveals that PPO protein (by reactivity with anti-PPO antibody) and activity (based upon ability to oxidize di-dihydroxyphenylalanine) are found only in fractions enriched in photosystem II (PSII). Furthermore, of the PSII particles isolated using three different protocols utilizing several plant species, all had PPO. Immunogold localization of PPO on thin sections reveals exclusive thylakoid labeling with a distribution pattern consistent with other PSII proteins (80% grana, 20% stroma). These data strongly indicate that PPO is at least peripherally associated with the PSII complex.     

Fluorescence Properties Indicate that Photosystem II Reaction Centers and Light-Harvesting Complex Are Modified by Low Temperature Growth in Winter Rye

Thylakoids isolated from winter rye (Secale cereale L. cv Puma) grown at 20°C (nonhardened rye, RNH) or 5°C (cold-hardened rye, RH) were characterized using chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence. Low temperature fluorescence emission spectra of RH thylakoids contained emission bands at 680 and 695 nanometers not present in RNH thylakoids which were interpreted as changes in the association of light-harvesting Chl a/b proteins and photosystem II (PSII) reaction centers. RH thylakoids also exhibited a decrease in the emission ratio of 742/685 nanometers relative to RNH thylakoids.

Room temperature fluorescence induction revealed that a larger proportion of Chl in RH thylakoids was inactive in transferring energy to PSII reaction centers when compared with RNH thylakoids. Fluorescence induction kinetics at 20°C indicated that RNH and RH thylakoids contained the same proportions of fast (α) and slow (β) components of the biphasic induction curve. In RH thylakoids, however, the rate constant for α components increased and the rate constant for β components decreased relative to RNH thylakoids. Thus, energy was transferred more quickly within a PSII reaction center complex in RH thylakoids. In addition, PSII reaction centers in RH thylakoids were less connected, thus reducing energy transfers between reaction center complexes. We concluded that both PSII reaction centers and light-harvesting Chl a/b proteins had been modified during development of rye chloroplasts at 5°C.

     

Plants Actively Avoid State Transitions upon Changes in Light Intensity: Role of Light-Harvesting Complex II Protein Dephosphorylation in High Light

Photosystem II (PSII) core and light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) proteins in plant chloroplasts undergo reversible phosphorylation upon changes in light intensity (being under control of redox-regulated STN7 and STN8 kinases and TAP38/PPH1 and PSII core phosphatases). Shift of plants from growth light to high light results in an increase of PSII core phosphorylation, whereas LHCII phosphorylation concomitantly decreases. Exactly the opposite takes place when plants are shifted to lower light intensity. Despite distinct changes occurring in thylakoid protein phosphorylation upon light intensity changes, the excitation balance between PSII and photosystem I remains unchanged. This differs drastically from the canonical-state transition model induced by artificial states 1 and 2 lights that concomitantly either dephosphorylate or phosphorylate, respectively, both the PSII core and LHCII phosphoproteins. Analysis of the kinase and phosphatase mutants revealed that TAP38/PPH1 phosphatase is crucial in preventing state transition upon increase in light intensity. Indeed, tap38/pph1 mutant revealed strong concomitant phosphorylation of both the PSII core and LHCII proteins upon transfer to high light, thus resembling the wild type under state 2 light. Coordinated function of thylakoid protein kinases and phosphatases is shown to secure balanced excitation energy for both photosystems by preventing state transitions upon changes in light intensity. Moreover, PROTON GRADIENT REGULATION5 (PGR5) is required for proper regulation of thylakoid protein kinases and phosphatases, and the pgr5 mutant mimics phenotypes of tap38/pph1. This shows that there is a close cooperation between the redox- and proton gradient-dependent regulatory mechanisms for proper function of the photosynthetic machinery.Photosynthetic light reactions take place in the chloroplast thylakoid membrane. Primary energy conversion reactions are performed by synchronized function of the two light energy-driven enzymes PSII and PSI. PSII uses excitation energy to split water into electrons and protons. PSII feeds electrons to the intersystem electron transfer chain (ETC) consisting of plastoquinone, cytochrome b₆f, and plastocyanin. PSI oxidizes the ETC in a light-driven reduction of NADP to NADPH. Light energy is collected by the light-harvesting antenna systems in the thylakoid membrane composed of specific pigment-protein complexes (light-harvesting complex I [LHCI] and LHCII). The majority of the light-absorbing pigments are bound to LHCII trimers that can serve the light harvesting of both photosystems (Galka et al., 2012; Kouřil et al., 2013; Wientjes et al., 2013b). Energy distribution from LHCII is regulated by protein phosphorylation (Bennett, 1979; Bennett et al., 1980; Allen et al., 1981) under control of the STN7 and STN8 kinases (Depège et al., 2003; Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Vainonen et al., 2005) and the TAP38/PPH1 and Photosystem II Core Phosphatase (PBCP) phosphatases (Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010; Samol et al., 2012). LHCII trimers are composed of LHCB1, LHCB2, and LHCB3 proteins, and in addition to reversible phosphorylation of LHCB1 and LHCB2, the protein composition of the LHCII trimers also affects the energy distribution from the light-harvesting system to photosystems (Damkjaer et al., 2009; Pietrzykowska et al., 2014). Most of the LHCII trimers are located in the PSII-rich grana membranes and PSII- and PSI-rich grana margins of the thylakoid membrane, and only a minor fraction resides in PSI- and ATP synthase-rich stroma lamellae (Tikkanen et al., 2008b; Suorsa et al., 2014). Both photosystems bind a small amount of LHCII trimers in biochemically isolatable PSII-LHCII and PSI-LHCII complexes (Pesaresi et al., 2009; Järvi et al., 2011; Caffarri et al., 2014). The large portion of the LHCII, however, does not form isolatable complexes with PSII or PSI, and therefore, it separates as free LHCII trimers upon biochemical fractionation of the thylakoid membrane by Suc gradient centrifugation or in native gel analyses (Caffarri et al., 2009; Järvi et al., 2011), the amount being dependent on the thylakoid isolation method. Nonetheless, in vivo, this major LHCII antenna fraction serves the light-harvesting function. This is based on the fact that fluorescence from free LHCII, peaking at 680 nm in 77-K fluorescence emission spectra, can only be detected when the energy transfer properties of the thylakoid membrane are disturbed by detergents (Grieco et al., 2015).Regulation of excitation energy distribution from LHCII to PSII and PSI has, for decades, been linked to LHCII phosphorylation and state transitions (Bennett, 1979; Bennett et al., 1980; Allen et al., 1981). It has been explained that a fraction of LHCII gets phosphorylated and migrates from PSII to PSI, which can be evidenced as increase in PSI cross section and was assigned as transition to state 2 (for review, see Allen, 2003; Rochaix et al., 2012). The LHCII proteins are, however, phosphorylated all over the thylakoid membrane (i.e. in the PSII- and LHCII-rich grana core) in grana margins containing PSII, LHCII, and PSI as well as in PSI-rich stroma lamellae also harboring PSII-LHCII, LHCII, and PSI-LHCII complexes in minor amounts (Tikkanen et al., 2008b; Grieco et al., 2012; Leoni et al., 2013; Wientjes et al., 2013a)—making the canonical-state transition theory inadequate to explain the physiological role of reversible LHCII phosphorylation (Tikkanen and Aro, 2014). Moreover, the traditional-state transition model is based on lateral segregation of PSII-LHCII and PSI-LHCI to different thylakoid domains. It, however, seems likely that PSII and PSI are energetically connected through a shared light-harvesting system composed of LHCII trimers (Grieco et al., 2015), and there is efficient excitation energy transfer between the two photosystems (Yokono et al., 2015). Nevertheless, it is clear that LHCII phosphorylation is a prerequisite to form an isolatable PSI-LHCII complex called the state transition complex (Pesaresi et al., 2009; Järvi et al., 2011). Existence of a minor state transition complex, however, does not explain why LHCII is phosphorylated all over the thylakoid membrane and how the energy transfer is regulated from the majority of LHCII antenna that is shared between PSII and PSI but does not form isolatable complexes with them (Grieco et al., 2015).Plants grown under any steady-state white light condition show the following characteristics of the thylakoid membrane: PSII core and LHCII phosphoproteins are moderately phosphorylated, phosphorylation takes place all over the thylakoid membrane, and the PSI-LHCII state transition complex is present (Järvi et al., 2011; Grieco et al., 2012; Wientjes et al., 2013b). Upon changes in the light intensity, the relative phosphorylation level between PSII core and LHCII phosphoproteins drastically changes (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000) in the timescale of 5 to 30 min. When light intensity increases, the PSII core protein phosphorylation increases, whereas the level of LHCII phosphorylation decreases. On the contrary, a decrease in light intensity decreases the phosphorylation level of PSII core proteins but strongly increases the phosphorylation of the LHCII proteins (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000). The presence and absence of the PSI-LHCII state transition complex correlate with LHCII phosphorylation (similar to the state transitions; Pesaresi et al., 2009; Wientjes et al., 2013b). Despite all of these changes in thylakoid protein phosphorylation, the relative excitation of PSII and PSI (i.e. the absorption cross section of PSII and PSI measured by 77-K fluorescence) remains nearly unchanged upon changes in white-light intensity (i.e. no state transitions can be observed despite massive differences in LHCII protein phosphorylation; Tikkanen et al., 2010).The existence of the opposing behaviors of PSII core and LHCII protein phosphorylation, as described above, has been known for more than 15 years (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000), but the physiological significance of this phenomenon has remained elusive. It is known that PSII core protein phosphorylation in high light (HL) facilitates the unpacking of PSII-LHCII complexes required for proper processing of the damaged PSII centers and thus, prevents oxidative damage of the photosynthetic machinery (Tikkanen et al., 2008a; Fristedt et al., 2009; Goral et al., 2010; Kirchhoff et al., 2011). It is also known that the damaged PSII core protein D1 needs to be dephosphorylated before its proteolytic degradation upon PSII turnover (Koivuniemi et al., 1995). There is, however, no coherent understanding available to explain why LHCII proteins are dephosphorylated upon exposure of plants to HL and PSII core proteins are dephosphorylated upon exposure to low light (LL).The above-described light quantity-dependent control of thylakoid protein phosphorylation drastically differs from the light quality-dependent protein phosphorylation (Tikkanen et al., 2010). State transitions are generally investigated by using different light qualities, preferentially exciting either PSI or PSII. State 1 light favors PSI excitation, leading to oxidation of the ETC and dephosphorylation of both the PSII core and LHCII proteins. State 2 light, in turn, preferentially excites PSII, leading to reduction of ETC and strong concomitant phosphorylation of both the PSII core and LHCII proteins (Haldrup et al., 2001). Shifts between states 1 and 2 lights induce state transitions, mechanisms that change the excitation between PSII and PSI (Murata and Sugahara, 1969; Murata, 2009). Similar to shifts between state lights, the shifts between LL and HL intensity also change the phosphorylation of the PSII core and LHCII proteins (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000). Importantly, the white-light intensity-induced changes in thylakoid protein phosphorylation do not change the excitation energy distribution between the two photosystems (Tikkanen et al., 2010). Despite this fundamental difference between the light quantity- and light quality-induced thylakoid protein phosphorylations, a common feature for both mechanisms is a strict requirement of LHCII phosphorylation for formation of the PSI-LHCII complex. However, it is worth noting that LHCII phosphorylation under state 2 light is not enough to induce the state 2 transition but that the P-LHCII docking proteins in the PSI complex are required (Lunde et al., 2000; Jensen et al., 2004; Zhang and Scheller, 2004; Leoni et al., 2013).Thylakoid protein phosphorylation is a dynamic redox-regulated process dependent on the interplay between two kinases (STN7 and STN8; Depège et al., 2003; Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Vainonen et al., 2005) and two phosphatases (TAP38/PPH1 and PBCP; Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010; Samol et al., 2012). Concerning the redox regulation mechanisms in vivo, only the LHCII kinase (STN7) has so far been thoroughly studied (Vener et al., 1997; Rintamäki et al., 2000; Lemeille et al., 2009). The STN7 kinase is considered as the LHCII kinase, and indeed, it phosphorylates the LHCB1 and LHCB2 proteins (Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Tikkanen et al., 2006). In addition to this, STN7 takes part in the phosphorylation of PSII core proteins (Vainonen et al., 2005), especially in LL (Tikkanen et al., 2008b, 2010). The STN8 kinase is required for phosphorylation of PSII core proteins in HL but does not significantly participate in phosphorylation of LHCII (Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Vainonen et al., 2005; Tikkanen et al., 2010). It has been shown that, in traditional state 1 condition, which oxidizes the ETC, the dephosphorylation of LHCII is dependent on TAP38/PPH1 phosphatase (Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010), whereas the PSII core protein dephosphorylation is dependent on the PBCP phosphatase (Samol et al., 2012). However, it remains unresolved whether and how the TAP38/PPH1 and PBCP phosphatases are involved in the light intensity-dependent regulation of thylakoid protein phosphorylation typical for natural environments.Here, we have used the two kinase (stn7 and stn8) and the two phosphatase (tap38/pph1and pbcp) mutants of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) to elucidate the individual roles of these enzymes in reversible thylakoid protein phosphorylation and distribution of excitation energy between PSII and PSI upon changes in light intensity. It is shown that the TAP38/PPH1-dependent, redox-regulated LHCII dephosphorylation is the key component to maintain excitation balance between PSII and PSI upon increase in light intensity, which at the same time, induces strong phosphorylation of the PSII core proteins. Collectively, reversible but opposite phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the PSII core and LHCII proteins upon increase or decrease in light intensity are shown to be crucial for maintenance of even distribution of excitation energy to both photosystems, thus preventing state transitions. Moreover, evidence is provided indicating that the pH gradient across the thylakoid membrane is yet another important component in regulation of the distribution of excitation energy to PSII and PSI, possibly by affecting the regulation of thylakoid kinases and phosphatases.