The Rubisco Small Subunit Is Involved in Tobamovirus Movement and Tm-22-Mediated Extreme Resistance

The multifunctional movement protein (MP) of Tomato mosaic tobamovirus (ToMV) is involved in viral cell-to-cell movement, symptom development, and resistance gene recognition. However, it remains to be elucidated how ToMV MP plays such diverse roles in plants. Here, we show that ToMV MP interacts with the Rubisco small subunit (RbCS) of Nicotiana benthamiana in vitro and in vivo. In susceptible N. benthamiana plants, silencing of NbRbCS enabled ToMV to induce necrosis in inoculated leaves, thus enhancing virus local infectivity. However, the development of systemic viral symptoms was delayed. In transgenic N. benthamiana plants harboring Tobacco mosaic virus resistance-2² (Tm-2²), which mediates extreme resistance to ToMV, silencing of NbRbCS compromised Tm-2²-dependent resistance. ToMV was able to establish efficient local infection but was not able to move systemically. These findings suggest that NbRbCS plays a vital role in tobamovirus movement and plant antiviral defenses.Plant viruses use at least one movement protein (MP) to facilitate viral spread between plant cells via plasmodesmata (PD; Lucas and Gilbertson, 1994; Ghoshroy et al., 1997). Among viral MPs, the MP of tobamoviruses, such as Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and its close relative Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV), is the best characterized. TMV MP specifically accumulates in PD and modifies the plasmodesmatal size exclusion limit in mature source leaves or tissues (Wolf et al., 1989; Deom et al., 1990; Ding et al., 1992). TMV MP and viral genomic RNA form a mobile ribonucleoprotein complex that is essential for cell-to-cell movement of viral infection (Watanabe et al., 1984; Deom et al., 1987; Citovsky et al., 1990, 1992; Kiselyova et al., 2001; Kawakami et al., 2004; Waigmann et al., 2007). TMV MP also enhances intercellular RNA silencing (Vogler et al., 2008) and affects viral symptom development, host range, and host susceptibility to virus (Dardick et al., 2000; Bazzini et al., 2007). Furthermore, ToMV MP is identified as an avirulence factor that is recognized by tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) resistance proteins Tobacco mosaic virus resistance-2 (Tm-2) and Tm-2² (Meshi et al., 1989; Lanfermeijer et al., 2004). Indeed, tomato Tm-2² confers extreme resistance against TMV and ToMV in tomato plants and even in heterologous tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants (Lanfermeijer et al., 2003, 2004).To date, several host factors that interact with TMV MP have been identified. These TMV MP-binding host factors include cell wall-associated proteins such as pectin methylesterase (Chen et al., 2000), calreticulin (Meshi et al., 1989), ANK1 (Ueki et al., 2010), and the cellular DnaJ-like protein MPIP1 (Shimizu et al., 2009). Many cytoskeletal components such as actin filaments (McLean et al., 1995), microtubules (Heinlein et al., 1995), and the microtubule-associated proteins MPB2C (Kragler et al., 2003) and EB1a (Brandner et al., 2008) also interact with TMV MP. Most of these factors are involved in TMV cell-to-cell movement.Rubisco catalyzes the first step of CO₂ assimilation in photosynthesis and photorespiration. The Rubisco holoenzyme is a heteropolymer consisting of eight large subunits (RbCLs) and eight small subunits (RbCSs). RbCL was reported to interact with the coat protein of Potato virus Y (Feki et al., 2005). Both RbCS and RbCL were reported to interact with the P3 proteins encoded by several potyviruses, including Shallot yellow stripe virus, Onion yellow dwarf virus, Soybean mosaic virus, and Turnip mosaic virus (Lin et al., 2011). Proteomic analysis of the plant-virus interactome revealed that RbCS participates in the formation of virus complexes of Rice yellow mottle virus (Brizard et al., 2006). However, the biological function of Rubisco in viral infection remains unknown.In this study, we show that RbCS plays an essential role in virus movement, host susceptibility, and Tm-2²-mediated extreme resistance in the ToMV-host plant interaction.     

Association of the P6 Protein of Cauliflower mosaic virus with Plasmodesmata and Plasmodesmal Proteins

The P6 protein of Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) is responsible for the formation of inclusion bodies (IBs), which are the sites for viral gene expression, replication, and virion assembly. Moreover, recent evidence indicates that ectopically expressed P6 inclusion-like bodies (I-LBs) move in association with actin microfilaments. Because CaMV virions accumulate preferentially in P6 IBs, we hypothesized that P6 IBs have a role in delivering CaMV virions to the plasmodesmata. We have determined that the P6 protein interacts with a C2 calcium-dependent membrane-targeting protein (designated Arabidopsis [Arabidopsis thaliana] Soybean Response to Cold [AtSRC2.2]) in a yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) two-hybrid screen and have confirmed this interaction through coimmunoprecipitation and colocalization assays in the CaMV host Nicotiana benthamiana. An AtSRC2.2 protein fused to red fluorescent protein (RFP) was localized to the plasma membrane and specifically associated with plasmodesmata. The AtSRC2.2-RFP fusion also colocalized with two proteins previously shown to associate with plasmodesmata: the host protein Plasmodesmata-Localized Protein1 (PDLP1) and the CaMV movement protein (MP). Because P6 I-LBs colocalized with AtSRC2.2 and the P6 protein had previously been shown to interact with CaMV MP, we investigated whether P6 I-LBs might also be associated with plasmodesmata. We examined the colocalization of P6-RFP I-LBs with PDLP1-green fluorescent protein (GFP) and aniline blue (a stain for callose normally observed at plasmodesmata) and found that P6-RFP I-LBs were associated with each of these markers. Furthermore, P6-RFP coimmunoprecipitated with PDLP1-GFP. Our evidence that a portion of P6-GFP I-LBs associate with AtSRC2.2 and PDLP1 at plasmodesmata supports a model in which P6 IBs function to transfer CaMV virions directly to MP at the plasmodesmata.Through the years, numerous studies have focused on the characterization of viral replication sites within the cell, as well as how plant virus movement proteins (MPs) modify the plasmodesmata to facilitate cell-to-cell movement (for review, see Benitez-Alfonso et al., 2010; Laliberté and Sanfaçon, 2010; Niehl and Heinlein, 2011; Ueki and Citovsky, 2011; Verchot, 2012). It is accepted that plant virus replication is associated with host membranes, and at some point, the viral genomic nucleic acid must be transferred from the site of replication in the cell to the plasmodesmata. This step could involve transport from a distant site within the cell, or alternatively, it may be that replication is coupled with transport at the entrance of the plasmodesmata (Tilsner et al., 2013). However, even with the latter model, there is ample evidence that the viral proteins necessary for replication or cell-to-cell movement utilize intracellular trafficking pathways within the cell to become positioned at the plasmodesma. These pathways may involve microfilaments, microtubules, or specific endomembranes that participate in macromolecular transport pathways, or combinations of these elements (Harries et al., 2010; Schoelz et al., 2011; Patarroyo et al., 2012; Peña and Heinlein, 2012; Tilsner and Oparka 2012; Liu and Nelson, 2013).The P6 protein of Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) is one viral protein that had not been considered to play a role in viral movement until recently. P6 is the most abundant protein component of the amorphous, electron-dense inclusion bodies (IBs) present during virus infection (Odell and Howell, 1980; Shockey et al., 1980). Ectopic expression of P6 in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves resulted in the formation of inclusion-like bodies (I-LBs) that were capable of intracellular movement along actin microfilaments. Furthermore, treatment of Nicotiana edwardsonii leaves with latrunculin B abolished the formation of CaMV local lesions, suggesting that intact microfilaments are required for CaMV infection (Harries et al., 2009a). A subsequent paper showed that P6 physically interacts with Chloroplast Unusual Positioning1 (CHUP1), a plant protein localized to the chloroplast outer membrane that contributes to movement of chloroplasts on microfilaments in response to changes in light intensity (Oikawa et al., 2003, 2008; Angel et al., 2013). The implication was that P6 might hijack CHUP1 to facilitate movement of the P6 IBs on microfilaments. Silencing of CHUP1 in N. edwardsonii, a host for CaMV, slowed the rate of local lesion formation, suggesting that CHUP1 contributes to intracellular movement of CaMV (Angel et al., 2013).In addition to its role in intracellular trafficking, the P6 protein has been shown to have at least four other distinct functions in the viral infection cycle. P6-containing IBs induced during virus infection are likely virion factories, as they are the primary site for CaMV protein synthesis, genome replication, and assembly of virions (Hohn and Fütterer, 1997). Second, P6 interacts with host ribosomes to facilitate reinitiation of translation of genes on the polycistronic 35S viral RNA, a process called translational transactivation (Bonneville et al., 1989; Park et al., 2001; Ryabova et al., 2002). The translational transactivator region of P6 (Fig. 1) defines the essential sequences required for translational transactivation (DeTapia et al., 1993). Third, P6 is an important pathogenicity determinant. P6 functions as an avirulence determinant in some solanaceous and cruciferous species (Daubert et al., 1984; Schoelz et al., 1986; Hapiak et al., 2008) and is a chlorosis symptom determinant in susceptible hosts (Daubert et al., 1984; Baughman et al., 1988; Goldberg et al., 1991; Cecchini et al., 1997). Finally, P6 has the capacity to compromise host defenses, as it is a suppressor of RNA silencing and cell death (Love et al., 2007; Haas et al., 2008), and it modulates signaling by salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, ethylene, and auxin (Geri et al., 2004; Love et al., 2012; Laird et al., 2013). Domain D1 of P6 has been shown to be necessary but not sufficient for suppression of silencing and salicylic acid-mediated defenses (Laird et al., 2013).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.CaMV and host constructs used for confocal microscopy or coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP). A, Structure of CaMV P6 and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) Soybean Response to Cold (AtSRC2.2) proteins. The functions of P6 domains D1 to D4 tested for interaction with AtSRC2.2 are indicated by the shaded boxes. The Mini TAV is the minimal region for the translational transactivation function. The NLSa sequence corresponds to the nuclear localization signal of influenza virus. The NLS sequence corresponds to the nuclear localization signal of human ribosomal protein L22. B, Structure of P6 (Angel et al., 2013), AtSRC2.2, PDLP (Thomas et al., 2008), and CaMV MP fusions developed for confocal microscopy and/or co-IP. aa, Amino acid.Because P6-containing IBs are the site for virion accumulation and they are capable of movement, they may be responsible for delivering virions to the CaMV MP located at the plasmodesmata (for review, see Schoelz et al., 2011). The vast majority of CaMV virions accumulate in association with P6-containing IBs. Furthermore, P6 physically interacts with the CaMV capsid and MP, as well as the two proteins necessary for aphid transmission, P2 and P3 (Himmelbach et al., 1996; Ryabova et al., 2002; Hapiak et al., 2008; Lutz et al., 2012). Recent studies have indicated that P6 IBs serve as a reservoir for virions, in which the virions may be rapidly transferred to P2 electron-lucent IBs for acquisition by aphids (Bak et al., 2013). It stands to reason that P6 IBs may also serve as a reservoir for CaMV virions to be transferred to the CaMV MP in the plasmodesmata.CaMV virions move from cell to cell through plasmodesmata modified into tubules through the function of its MP (Perbal et al., 1993; Kasteel et al., 1996). However, studies have suggested that CaMV virions do not appear to directly interact with the MP. Instead, the MP interacts with the CaMV P3 protein (also known as the virion-associated protein [VAP]), which forms a trimeric structure that is anchored into the virions (Leclerc et al., 1998; Leclerc et al., 2001). Electron microscopy studies have indicated that MP and VAP colocalize with virions only at the entrance to or within the plasmodesmata, and it has been suggested that the VAP/virion complex travels to the plasmodesmata independently from the MP (Stavolone et al., 2005). Consequently, there is a need for a second CaMV protein such as P6 to fulfill the role of delivery of virions to the plasmodesmata (Schoelz et al., 2011).Additional studies have shown that the CaMV MP is incorporated into vesicles and is trafficked on the endomembrane system to reach the plasmodesma (Carluccio et al., 2014). These authors suggest that the CaMV MP is recycled in a vesicular transport pathway between plasmodesmata and early endosome compartments. The CaMV MP interacts with µA-Adaptin (Carluccio et al., 2014) and Movement Protein-Interacting7 (Huang et al., 2001), two proteins shown to have a role in vesicular trafficking. Once the MP arrives at plasmodesmata, it interacts with the Plasmodesmata-Localized Protein (PDLP) proteins, which comprise a family of eight proteins associated with plasmodesmata (Amari et al., 2010). In addition to its interaction with CaMV MP, PDLP1 interacts with the 2B protein of Grapevine fan leaf virus (GFLV) at the base of tubules formed by the 2B protein. Furthermore, an Arabidopsis transfer DNA (T-DNA) mutant line in which three PDLP genes had been knocked out (pdlp1-pdlp2-pdlp3) responded to GFLV and CaMV inoculation with a delayed infection (Amari et al., 2010). This has led to the suggestion that the PDLPs might act as receptors for the MPs of the tubule-forming viruses such as GFLV and CaMV (Amari et al., 2010, 2011).To better understand the function of the P6 protein during CaMV intracellular movement, we have utilized a yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) two-hybrid assay to identify host proteins that interact with CaMV P6. We show that P6 physically interacts with a C2-calcium-dependent protein (designated AtSRC2.2). AtSRC2.2 is a membrane-bound protein that is capable of forming punctate spots associated with plasmodesmata. The localization of AtSRC2.2 with plasmodesmata led to an analysis of interactions between P6 I-LBs, AtSRC2.2, PDLP1, and the CaMV MP and also revealed that a portion of P6 I-LBs are found adjacent to plasmodesmata. These results provide further evidence for a model in which P6 IBs are capable of delivery of virions to plasmodesmata for their transit to other host cells.     

Putting the Squeeze on Plasmodesmata: A Role for Reticulons in Primary Plasmodesmata Formation

Primary plasmodesmata (PD) arise at cytokinesis when the new cell plate forms. During this process, fine strands of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are laid down between enlarging Golgi-derived vesicles to form nascent PD, each pore containing a desmotubule, a membranous rod derived from the cortical ER. Little is known about the forces that model the ER during cell plate formation. Here, we show that members of the reticulon (RTNLB) family of ER-tubulating proteins in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) may play a role in the formation of the desmotubule. RTNLB3 and RTNLB6, two RTNLBs present in the PD proteome, are recruited to the cell plate at late telophase, when primary PD are formed, and remain associated with primary PD in the mature cell wall. Both RTNLBs showed significant colocalization at PD with the viral movement protein of Tobacco mosaic virus, while superresolution imaging (three-dimensional structured illumination microscopy) of primary PD revealed the central desmotubule to be labeled by RTNLB6. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching studies showed that these RTNLBs are mobile at the edge of the developing cell plate, where new wall materials are being delivered, but significantly less mobile at its center, where PD are forming. A truncated RTNLB3, unable to constrict the ER, was not recruited to the cell plate at cytokinesis. We discuss the potential roles of RTNLBs in desmotubule formation.Plasmodesmata (PD), the small pores that connect higher plant cells, are complex structures of about 50 nm in diameter. Each PD pore is lined by the plasma membrane and contains an axial endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-derived structure known as the desmotubule (Overall and Blackman, 1996; Maule, 2008; Tilsner et al., 2011). The desmotubule is an enigmatic structure whose function has not been fully elucidated. The small spiraling space between the desmotubule and the plasma membrane, known as the cytoplasmic sleeve, is almost certainly a conduit for the movement of small molecules (Oparka et al., 1999). Some reports, however, suggest that the desmotubule may also function in cell-to-cell trafficking, providing an ER-derived pathway between cells along which macromolecules may diffuse (Cantrill et al., 1999). The desmotubule is one of the most tightly constricted membrane structures found in nature (Tilsner et al., 2011), but the forces that generate its intense curvature are not understood. In most PD, the desmotubule is a tightly furled tube of about 15 nm in diameter in which the membranes of the ER are in close contact along its length. The desmotubule may balloon out in the region of the middle lamella into a central cavity, but at the neck regions of the PD pore it is tightly constricted (Robinson-Beers and Evert, 1991; Ding et al., 1992; Glockmann and Kollmann, 1996; Overall and Blackman, 1996; Ehlers and Kollmann, 2001). Studies of PD using GFP targeted to the ER lumen (e.g. GFP-HDEL) have shown that GFP is excluded from the desmotubule due to the constriction of ER membranes in this structure (Oparka et al., 1999; Crawford and Zambryski, 2000; Martens et al., 2006; Guenoune-Gelbart et al., 2008). Therefore, lumenal GFP is unable to move between plant cells unless the membranes of the desmotubule become relaxed in some way. On the other hand, dyes and some proteins inserted into the ER membrane can apparently move through the desmotubule, either along the membrane or through the lumen, at least under some conditions (Grabski et al., 1993; Cantrill et al., 1999; Martens et al., 2006; Guenoune-Gelbart et al., 2008).Recently, a number of proteins have been described in mammalian, yeast, and plant systems that induce extreme membrane curvature. Among these are the RETICULONS (RTNs), integral membrane proteins that induce curvature of the ER to form tubules (Voeltz et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2008; Tolley et al., 2008, 2010; Sparkes et al., 2010). In animals, RTNs have been shown to be involved in a wide array of endomembrane-related processes, including intracellular transport and vesicle formation, and as RTNs can also influence axonal growth, they may have roles in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease (Yang and Strittmatter, 2007). Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has 21 RTN homologs, known as RTNLBs (Nziengui et al., 2007; Sparkes et al., 2010), considerably more than in yeast or mammals, but most have not been examined. RTNLBs contain two unusually long hydrophobic helices that form reentrant loops (Voeltz et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2008; Sparkes et al., 2010; Tolley et al., 2010). These are thought to induce membrane curvature by the molecular wedge principle (Hu et al., 2008; Shibata et al., 2009). When RTNLBs are overexpressed transiently in cells expressing GFP-HDEL, the ER becomes tightly constricted and GFP-HDEL is excluded from the lumen of the constricted ER tubules (Tolley et al., 2008, 2010), a situation similar to that which occurs in desmotubules (Oparka et al., 1999; Crawford and Zambryski, 2000; Martens et al., 2006). In vitro studies with isolated membranes have shown that the degree of tubulation is proportional to the number and spacing of RTNLB proteins in the membrane (Hu et al., 2008). For example, to constrict the ER membrane into a structure of 15 nm, the diameter of a desmotubule, would require RTNLBs to be inserted every 2 nm or less along the desmotubule axis (Hu et al., 2008), potentially making the desmotubule an extremely protein-rich structure (Tilney et al., 1991). Interestingly, a number of RTNLB proteins appear in the recently described PD proteome (Fernandez-Calvino et al., 2011), suggesting that RTNLBs are good candidates for proteins that model the cortical ER into desmotubules.Primary PD form at cytokinesis during the assembly of the cell plate (Hawes et al., 1981; Hepler, 1982). Of the numerous studies devoted to the structure of the cell plate, very few have examined the behavior of the ER during cytokinesis. During mitosis, elements of the ER are located in the spindle apparatus, separated from the cytoplasm (Hepler, 1980). Just prior to cytokinesis, there is a relative paucity of ER in the region destined to become the cell plate (Hepler, 1980; Hawes et al., 1981). The studies of Hawes et al. (1981) and Hepler (1982), exploiting heavy-metal impregnation of the ER, showed that during the formation of the new cell plate, strands of cortical ER are inserted across the developing wall, between the Golgi-derived vesicles that deposit wall materials. These ER strands become increasingly thinner during formation of the desmotubule, eventually excluding heavy metal stains from the ER lumen (Hepler, 1982). The center of the desmotubule often appears electron opaque in transmission electron microscopy images and has been referred to as the central rod (Overall and Blackman, 1996). This structure may consist of proteins that extend from the inner ER leaflets or may correspond to head groups of the membrane lipids themselves. In the fully formed primary PD, the desmotubule remains continuous with the cortical ER that runs close to the new cell wall (Hawes et al., 1981; Hepler, 1982; Oparka et al., 1994).Here, we show that two of the RTNLBs present in the PD proteome, RTNLB3 and RTNLB6, become localized to the cell plate during the formation of primary PD. These RTNLBs remain associated with the desmotubule in fully formed PD and are immobile, as evidenced by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) studies. A truncated version of RTNLB3, in which the second hydrophobic region was deleted (Sparkes et al., 2010), was not recruited to the cell plate at cytokinesis. We suggest that RTNLBs play an important role in the formation of primary PD and discuss mechanisms by which these proteins may model the ER into desmotubules.     

Reticulomics: Protein-Protein Interaction Studies with Two Plasmodesmata-Localized Reticulon Family Proteins Identify Binding Partners Enriched at Plasmodesmata,Endoplasmic Reticulum,and the Plasma Membrane

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a ubiquitous organelle that plays roles in secretory protein production, folding, quality control, and lipid biosynthesis. The cortical ER in plants is pleomorphic and structured as a tubular network capable of morphing into flat cisternae, mainly at three-way junctions, and back to tubules. Plant reticulon family proteins (RTNLB) tubulate the ER by dimerization and oligomerization, creating localized ER membrane tensions that result in membrane curvature. Some RTNLB ER-shaping proteins are present in the plasmodesmata (PD) proteome and may contribute to the formation of the desmotubule, the axial ER-derived structure that traverses primary PD. Here, we investigate the binding partners of two PD-resident reticulon proteins, RTNLB3 and RTNLB6, that are located in primary PD at cytokinesis in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Coimmunoprecipitation of green fluorescent protein-tagged RTNLB3 and RTNLB6 followed by mass spectrometry detected a high percentage of known PD-localized proteins as well as plasma membrane proteins with putative membrane-anchoring roles. Förster resonance energy transfer by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy assays revealed a highly significant interaction of the detected PD proteins with the bait RTNLB proteins. Our data suggest that RTNLB proteins, in addition to a role in ER modeling, may play important roles in linking the cortical ER to the plasma membrane.The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a multifunctional organelle (Hawes et al., 2015) and is the site of secretory protein production, folding, and quality control (Brandizzi et al., 2003) and lipid biosynthesis (Wallis and Browse, 2010), but it is also involved in many other aspects of day-to-day plant life, including auxin regulation (Friml and Jones, 2010) and oil and protein body formation (Huang, 1996; Herman, 2008). The cortical ER network displays a remarkable polygonal arrangement of motile tubules that are capable of morphing into small cisternae, mainly at the three-way junctions of the ER network (Sparkes et al., 2009). The cortical ER network of plants has been shown to play multiple roles in protein trafficking (Palade, 1975; Vitale and Denecke, 1999) and pathogen responses (for review, see Pattison and Amtmann, 2009; Beck et al., 2012).In plants, the protein family of reticulons (RTNLBs) contributes significantly to tubulation of the ER (Tolley et al., 2008, 2010; Chen et al., 2012). RTNLBs are integral ER membrane proteins that feature a C-terminal reticulon homology domain (RHD) that contains two major hydrophobic regions. These regions form two V-shaped transmembrane wedges joined together via a cytosolic loop, with the C and N termini of the protein facing the cytosol. RTNLBs can dimerize or oligomerize, creating localized tensions in the ER membrane, inducing varying degrees of membrane curvature (Sparkes et al., 2010). Hence, RTNLBs are considered to be essential in maintaining the tubular ER network.The ability of RTNLBs to constrict membranes is of interest in the context of cell plate development and the formation of primary plasmodesmata (PD; Knox et al., 2015). PD formation involves extensive remodeling of the cortical ER into tightly furled tubules to form the desmotubules, axial structures that run through the PD pore (Overall and Blackman, 1996; Ehlers and Kollmann, 2001). At only 15 nm in diameter, the desmotubule is one of the most constricted membrane structures found in nature, with no animal counterparts (Tilsner et al., 2011). PD are membrane-rich structures characterized by a close association of the plasma membrane (PM) with the ER. The forces that model the ER into desmotubules, however, are poorly understood. RTNLBs are excellent candidates for this process and can constrict fluorescent protein-labeled ER membranes into extremely fine tubules (Sparkes et al., 2010). We showed recently that two of the RTNLBs present in the PD proteome, RTNLB3 and RTNLB6 (Fernandez-Calvino et al., 2011), are present in primary PD at cytokinesis (Knox et al., 2015). However, nothing is known of the proteins that interact with RTNLBs identified in the PD proteome or that may link RTNLBs to the PM. To date, the only protein shown to bind to plant RTNLBs is RHD3-LIKE2, the plant homolog of the ER tubule fusion protein ATLASTIN (Lee et al., 2013).Here, we used a dual approach to identify interacting partners of RTNLB3 and RTNLB6 (Fernandez-Calvino et al., 2011; Knox et al.., 2015). First, we used GFP immunoprecipitation assays coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) to identify proteins potentially binding to RTNLB3 and RTNLB6. Second, from the proteins we identified, we conducted a detailed Förster resonance energy transfer by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FRET-FLIM) analysis to confirm prey-bait interactions in vivo.The application of time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy to imaging biological systems has allowed the design and implementation of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). The technique allows measuring and determining the space map of picosecond fluorescence decay at each pixel of the image through confocal single and multiphoton excitation. The general fluorescence or Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to determine the colocalization of two color chromophores can now be improved to determine physical interactions using FRET-FLIM and protein pairs tagged with appropriate GFP fluorophores and monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP). FRET-FLIM measures the reduction in the excited-state lifetime of GFP (donor) fluorescence in the presence of an acceptor fluorophore (e.g. mRFP) that is independent of the problems associated with steady-state intensity measurements. The observation of such a reduction is an indication that the two proteins are within a distance of 1 to 10 nm, thus indicating a direct physical interaction between the two protein fusions (Osterrieder et al., 2009; Sparkes et al., 2010; Schoberer and Botchway, 2014). It was shown previously that a reduction of as little as approximately 200 ps in the excited-state lifetime of the GFP-labeled protein represents quenching through a protein-protein interaction (Stubbs et al., 2005).Our interaction data identified a large percentage (40%) of ER proteins, including other RTNLB family members. However, we also found a relatively large number (25%) of proteins present in the published PD proteome (Fernandez-Calvino et al., 2011) and a surprisingly high proportion (35%) of PM proteins. Of the PD-resident proteins we identified, a significant number were shown previously to be targets of viral movement proteins (MPs) or proteins present within lipid rafts, consistent with the view that PD are lipid-rich microdomains (Bayer et al., 2014). Additional proteins identified suggested roles for RTNLBs in transport and pathogen defense. We suggest that RTNLBs may play key roles in anchoring and/or signaling between the cortical ER and PM.     

ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE3 Family of Dynamin-Like GTPases Mediates Homotypic Endoplasmic Reticulum Fusion and Is Essential for Arabidopsis Development

In all eukaryotic cells, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) forms a tubular network whose generation requires the fusion of ER membranes. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the membrane-bound GTPase ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE3 (RHD3) is a potential candidate to mediate ER fusion. In addition, Arabidopsis has two tissue-specific isoforms of RHD3, namely RHD3-like (RL) proteins, and their function is not clear. Here, we show that a null allele of RHD3, rhd3-8, causes growth defects and shortened root hairs. A point mutant, rhd3-1, exhibits a more severe growth phenotype than the null mutant, likely because it exerts a dominant-negative effect on the RL proteins. Genetic analysis reveals that the double deletion of RHD3 and RL1 is lethal and that the rhd3 rl2 plants produce no viable pollen, suggesting that the RL proteins are redundant to RHD3. RHD3 family proteins can replace Sey1p, the homolog of RHD3 in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), in the maintenance of ER morphology, and they are able to fuse membranes both in vivo and in vitro. Our results suggest that RHD3 proteins mediate ER fusion and are essential for plant development and that the formation of the tubular ER network is of general physiological significance.In all eukaryotic cells, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) comprises a continuous membrane system of sheets and tubules (Baumann and Walz, 2001; Shibata et al., 2006). ER tubules frequently connect through homotypic membrane fusion to form a reticular network (Lee and Chen, 1988; Prinz et al., 2000; Du et al., 2004). ER fusion in metazoans is mediated by the atlastins (ATLs), a class of dynamin-like, membrane-bound GTPases (Hu et al., 2009; Orso et al., 2009). ATL possesses a cytoplasmic N-terminal GTPase domain, followed by a helical domain, two closely spaced transmembrane domains, and a C-terminal cytosolic tail. ATL proteins localize mostly to ER tubules and they interact with the tubule-shaping proteins, reticulons and DP1 (Hu et al., 2009). A role for the ATLs in ER fusion is suggested by the fact that depletion of ATLs leads to long, nonbranched ER tubules in cultured cells (Hu et al., 2009) and to ER fragmentation in Drosophila melanogaster (Orso et al., 2009), possibly due to insufficient fusion between the tubules. Nonbranched ER tubules are also observed upon the expression of dominant-negative ATL mutants (Hu et al., 2009). In addition, antibodies to ATL inhibit ER network formation in Xenopus laevis egg extracts (Hu et al., 2009). Moreover, proteoliposomes containing purified D. melanogaster ATL undergo GTP-dependent fusion in vitro (Orso et al., 2009; Bian et al., 2011). The physiological significance of ER fusion is supported by the observation that mutations in human ATL1, the dominant isoform in the brain, cause hereditary spastic paraplegia (Zhao et al., 2001), a neurodegenerative disease characterized by axon shortening in corticospinal motor neurons and progressive spasticity and weakness of the lower limbs (Salinas et al., 2008).Many organisms lack ATL homologs. In yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), another dynamin-like GTPase, Sey1p, has been found to share the same signature motifs and membrane topology as ATL (Hu et al., 2009). Recent work suggests that Sey1p mediates ER membrane fusion both in vivo and in vitro (Anwar et al., 2012). Cells lacking Sey1p grow normally (Hu et al., 2009), but additional mutation of an ER SNARE Ufe1p, which probably represents an alternative ER fusion mechanism in yeast, causes severe growth defects (Anwar et al., 2012). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the potential functional ortholog of ATL appears to be ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE3 (RHD3; Hu et al., 2009), which was initially discovered by a genetic screen of root hair-defective mutants (Schiefelbein and Somerville, 1990). It is sequence related to Sey1p over the entire length (Wang et al., 1997; Brands and Ho, 2002). Mutations of RHD3 cause short and wavy root hairs (Schiefelbein and Somerville, 1990; Wang et al., 1997; Stefano et al., 2012) and defects in cell expansion (Wang et al., 2002).Despite the sequence homology between Sey1p and RHD3, it was reported that Sey1p could not replace RHD3 in plants and vice versa (Chen et al., 2011). Therefore, it is not clear whether RHD3 can mediate ER fusion. Another complication in plants is that the Arabidopsis RHD3 family also contains two RHD3-like (RL) proteins (Hu et al., 2003): RL1 is expressed only in pollen, whereas RL2 is expressed ubiquitously, but both are present at very low levels. Deletion of either RL protein causes no detectable defects in root hair development or overall growth (Chen et al., 2011). Whether RL proteins support the role of RHD3 in a tissue-specific manner remains to be investigated.Here, we have analyzed the function of RHD3 and RL proteins in Arabidopsis. We show that RHD3 and the two RL proteins play redundant roles but function during different stages of Arabidopsis development. In addition, we show that RHD3 proteins can functionally replace Sey1p in yeast and mediate ER membrane fusion.     

A New LxxxA Motif in the Transmembrane Helix3 of Maize Aquaporins Belonging to the Plasma Membrane Intrinsic Protein PIP2 Group Is Required for Their Trafficking to the Plasma Membrane

Aquaporins play important roles in maintaining plant water status under challenging environments. The regulation of aquaporin density in cell membranes is essential to control transcellular water flows. This work focuses on the maize (Zea mays) plasma membrane intrinsic protein (ZmPIP) aquaporin subfamily, which is divided into two sequence-related groups (ZmPIP1s and ZmPIP2s). When expressed alone in mesophyll protoplasts, ZmPIP2s are efficiently targeted to the plasma membrane, whereas ZmPIP1s are retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). A protein domain-swapping approach was utilized to demonstrate that the transmembrane domain3 (TM3), together with the previously identified N-terminal ER export diacidic motif, account for the differential localization of these proteins. In addition to protoplasts, leaf epidermal cells transiently transformed by biolistic particle delivery were used to confirm and refine these results. By generating artificial proteins consisting of a single transmembrane domain, we demonstrated that the TM3 of ZmPIP1;2 or ZmPIP2;5 discriminates between ER and plasma membrane localization, respectively. More specifically, a new LxxxA motif in the TM3 of ZmPIP2;5, which is highly conserved in plant PIP2s, was shown to regulate its anterograde routing along the secretory pathway, particularly its export from the ER.Aquaporins are of major importance to plant physiology, being essential for the regulation of transcellular water movement during growth and development (Maurel et al., 2008; Gomes et al., 2009; Heinen et al., 2009; Prado and Maurel, 2013; Chaumont and Tyerman, 2014). Aquaporins are small membrane proteins consisting of six transmembrane (TM) domains connected by five loops (A–E), and N and C termini facing the cytosol (Fig. 1A). They assemble as homotetramers and/or heterotetramers in the membrane, with each monomer acting as an independent water channel (Murata et al., 2000; Fetter et al., 2004; Gomes et al., 2009). Aquaporins form a highly divergent protein family in plants (Chaumont et al., 2001; Johanson et al., 2001), and this work focuses on the maize (Zea mays) plasma membrane intrinsic protein (ZmPIP) family (Chaumont et al., 2001). The regulation of the subcellular localization of these proteins is a key process controlling their density in the plasma membrane (PM) and, hence, their physiological roles (Hachez et al., 2013).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Swapping TM3 of ZmPIP2;5 with that of ZmPIP1;2 retains the protein in intracellular structures. A, Cartoons representing the chimeric proteins composed of ZmPIP2;5, in which each TM has been replaced by the corresponding TM from ZmPIP1;2. All proteins are drawn with the cytosolic domains facing down. ZmPIP2;5 and ZmPIP1;2 portions are shown in black and white, respectively. All chimeras were fused to the C terminus of mYFP, which is not displayed for clarity purposes. B, Confocal microscopy images of maize mesophyll protoplasts transiently coexpressing mYFP-tagged ZmPIP2;5-PIP1;2 TM chimeric proteins (green) and the ER marker mCFP:HDEL (cyan). FM4-64 was added as a PM marker (red). Arrowheads in image 13 indicate accumulation of the protein in punctate structures that are not labeled by mCFP:HDEL. The localization patterns of the proteins of interest are representative of a total of at least 22 cells from three independent experiments. C, Confocal microscopy images of a maize mesophyll protoplast transiently expressing mYFP:ZmPIP2;5-TM3_PIP1;2 (green) and ST:mCFP (magenta). Arrowheads indicate colocalization in Golgi stacks. The images are representative of a total of 17 cells from two independent experiments. Bar = 5 µm.PIP aquaporins cluster in two groups (PIP1s and PIP2s), which are highly conserved across species (Kammerloher et al., 1994; Chaumont et al., 2000, 2001; Johanson et al., 2001; Anderberg et al., 2012). We previously showed that the maize PIP1 and PIP2 isoforms exhibit different water channel activities when expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, with only PIP2s increasing the membrane water permeability coefficient (P_f; Chaumont et al., 2000). However, when ZmPIP1 and ZmPIP2 are coexpressed, the isoforms physically interact to modify their stability and trafficking to the oocyte membrane, and synergistically increase the oocyte P_f (Fetter et al., 2004). Similar synergistic interactions between PIP1s and PIP2s have been reported in numerous plant species (Temmei et al., 2005; Mahdieh et al., 2008; Vandeleur et al., 2009; Bellati et al., 2010; Ayadi et al., 2011; Horie et al., 2011; Yaneff et al., 2014).PIPs were originally thought to be exclusively localized in the PM and were named accordingly (Kammerloher et al., 1994). However, recent experiments have shown that not all PIPs are located to the PM under all conditions, and that regulation of PIP subcellular localization is a highly dynamic process involving protein interactions (Boursiac et al., 2005, 2008; Zelazny et al., 2007, 2009; Uehlein et al., 2008; Besserer et al., 2012; Luu et al., 2012). When expressed singly in maize leaf mesophyll protoplasts, fluorescently tagged ZmPIP1s and ZmPIP2s differ in their subcellular localization. ZmPIP1s are retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), whereas ZmPIP2s are targeted to the PM (Zelazny et al., 2007). However, upon coexpression, ZmPIP1s are relocalized from the ER to the PM, where they perfectly colocalize with ZmPIP2s. This relocalization results from their physical interaction as demonstrated by Förster resonance energy transfer/fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy and immunoprecipitation experiments (Zelazny et al., 2007). These results indicate that ZmPIP2s, but not ZmPIP1s, possess signals that allow them to be delivered to the PM, and that hetero-oligomerization is required for ZmPIP1 trafficking to the PM. Interestingly, a diacidic motif (DxE, Asp-any amino acid-Glu) located in the N terminus of ZmPIP2;4, ZmPIP2;5, and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) AtPIP2;1 was shown to be required to exit the ER (Zelazny et al., 2009; Sorieul et al., 2011). Diacidic motifs interact with Secretory protein24, which is thought to be the main cargo-selection protein of the Coat proteinII complex that mediates vesicle formation at ER export sites (Miller et al., 2003). However, not all PM-localized PIP2s contain a diacidic ER export signal (Zelazny et al., 2009). In addition, swapping the N-terminal region of ER-retained ZmPIP1;2 with that of PM-localized ZmPIP2;5, which contains the functional diacidic motif, is not sufficient to trigger ER export of the protein (Zelazny et al., 2009). This result suggests that other export signals might be present in PIP2s and/or ER retention signals might be present in PIP1s elsewhere than in the N terminus.To identify new signals regulating ZmPIP1 and ZmPIP2 protein trafficking along the secretory pathway, we used a protein domain swapping-based approach and identified the TM3 as an important region that discriminates between ER-retained ZmPIP1;2 and PM-localized ZmPIP2;5. Specific mutations in the TM3 region of ZmPIP2;5 allowed the identification of a new ZmPIP2-conserved LxxxA motif, which regulates its export from the ER.     

DEVELOPMENTALLY REGULATED PLASMA MEMBRANE PROTEIN of Nicotiana benthamiana Contributes to Potyvirus Movement and Transports to Plasmodesmata via the Early Secretory Pathway and the Actomyosin System

The intercellular movement of plant viruses requires both viral and host proteins. Previous studies have demonstrated that the frame-shift protein P3N-PIPO (for the protein encoded by the open reading frame [ORF] containing 5′-terminus of P3 and a +2 frame-shift ORF called Pretty Interesting Potyviridae ORF and embedded in the P3) and CYLINDRICAL INCLUSION (CI) proteins were required for potyvirus cell-to-cell movement. Here, we provide genetic evidence showing that a Tobacco vein banding mosaic virus (TVBMV; genus Potyvirus) mutant carrying a truncated PIPO domain of 58 amino acid residues could move between cells and induce systemic infection in Nicotiana benthamiana plants; mutants carrying a PIPO domain of seven, 20, or 43 amino acid residues failed to move between cells and cause systemic infection in this host plant. Interestingly, the movement-defective mutants produced progeny that eliminated the previously introduced stop codons and thus restored their systemic movement ability. We also present evidence showing that a developmentally regulated plasma membrane protein of N. benthamiana (referred to as NbDREPP) interacted with both P3N-PIPO and CI of the movement-competent TVBMV. The knockdown of NbDREPP gene expression in N. benthamiana impeded the cell-to-cell movement of TVBMV. NbDREPP was shown to colocalize with TVBMV P3N-PIPO and CI at plasmodesmata (PD) and traffic to PD via the early secretory pathway and the actomyosin motility system. We also show that myosin XI-2 is specially required for transporting NbDREPP to PD. In conclusion, NbDREPP is a key host protein within the early secretory pathway and the actomyosin motility system that interacts with two movement proteins and influences virus movement.The movement of viruses in plants can be divided into three stages: intracellular, intercellular, and long-distance movement (Nelson and Citovsky, 2005; Benitez-Alfonso et al., 2010). Plasmodesmata (PD) are plasma membrane-mediated channels in cell walls that control the intercellular trafficking of micromolecules and macromolecules, including plant viruses (Boevink and Oparka, 2005; Lucas et al., 2009). Plant viruses encode movement proteins (MPs) that can regulate the size exclusion limit (SEL) of PD and mediate virus trafficking between cells (Lucas, 2006; Raffaele et al., 2009; Amari et al., 2010; Ueki et al., 2010). Based on the functions of MPs during virus movement, the viral MPs are divided into three major groups. The first group of MPs is represented by the 30-kD protein of Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV). The 30-kD proteins can interact with single-stranded RNAs and transport viral ribonucleoprotein complexes to cell walls, where they modify the SEL of PD to allow viruses to traverse the cell walls (Olesinski et al., 1996; Tzfira et al., 2000; Kawakami et al., 2004). The second group of MPs is known to form tubular structures that extend across the PD and allow virus to traverse. Viruses that encode this group of MPs include Cowpea mosaic virus, Grapevine fan leaf virus (GFLV), Cauliflower mosaic virus, and Tomato spotted wilt virus (Ritzenthaler and Hofmann, 2007; Amari et al., 2011). The third group of MPs is known as triple gene block proteins (TGBps), encoded by overlapping triple gene blocks. The three TGBps (TGBp1, TGBp2, and TGBp3) function coordinately to transport viral genomes to and through PD (Verchot-Lubicz, 2005; Jackson et al., 2009; Lim et al., 2009; Tilsner et al., 2013). Viruses that encode TGBps belong to the genera Potexvirus, Hordeivirus, and Pomovirus (Verchot-Lubicz et al., 2010). Potyviruses are different from the above viruses and lack a dedicated MP. To date, multiple potyviral proteins, including COAT PROTEIN, CYLINDRICAL INCLUSION (CI), HELPER COMPONENT PROTEINASE (HC-Pro), and VIRAL GENOME-LINKED PROTEIN, have been shown to function in the cell-to-cell movement of potyviruses (Nicolas et al., 1997; Rojas et al., 1997; Carrington et al., 1998; Wei et al., 2010).Viruses of Potyvirus (family Potyviridae), the largest genus of plant-infecting viruses, cause great economic losses to world agriculture production (Fauquet et al., 2005). The potyviral genome is a positive sense, single-stranded RNA of approximately 10 kb in length. It contains a large open reading frame (ORF) encoding a polyprotein that is later processed into 10 mature proteins by three virus-encoded proteinases (Riechmann et al., 1992; Fauquet et al., 2005). A +2 frame-shift Pretty Interesting Potyviridae (PIPO) ORF that is embedded within the P3 ORF was recently identified and proposed to produce a P3N-PIPO (for the protein encoded by 5′-terminus of P3 and frame-shift PIPO) fusion (Chung et al., 2008; Vijayapalani et al., 2012). The P3N-PIPOs of Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) and Tobacco etch virus were previously shown to localize at PD, interact with CI in planta, and transport CI to PD in a CI:P3N-PIPO ratio-dependent manner (Wei et al., 2010). Soybean mosaic virus with a mutant PIPO domain failed to cause systemic infection in its host plant (Wen and Hajimorad, 2010). Therefore, the potyvirus P3N-PIPO has been suggested as the classical MP (Tilsner and Oparka, 2012; Vijayapalani et al., 2012).Viruses recruit host factors for their movement in plants (Chen et al., 2000; Raffaele et al., 2009; Amari et al., 2010; Ueki et al., 2010). Compared with the progresses on viral MP characterization, identifications of MP-interacting host proteins are much behind (Chen et al., 2000; Oparka, 2004; Raffaele et al., 2009; Amari et al., 2010). To date, about 20 host proteins have been identified to interact with specific viral MPs (Pallas and García, 2011). For example, the pectin methylesterase interacted with TMV MP, increased the SEL of PD, and facilitated TMV movement between cells (Chen et al., 2000); an ankyrin repeat-containing protein (ANK) interacted with TMV MP at PD, down-regulated callose formation, and aided viral movement (Ueki et al., 2010); the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) PLASMODESMATA-LOCALIZED PROTEIN1 (AtPDLP1) was reported to interact with GFLV MP and mediate tubule assembly during GFLV cell-to-cell movement in plants (Amari et al., 2010, 2011). TuMV P3N-PIPO was shown to interact with AtPCaP1, a plasma membrane cation-binding protein of Arabidopsis, and colocalize with this host protein at the PD. Knockout of AtPCaP1 expression resulted in a significant reduction of TuMV infection in Arabidopsis (Vijayapalani et al., 2012).Many viral MPs have been shown to traffic within plant cells via the early secretory pathway and/or along the actin filaments or microtubules. For example, the early secretory pathway and microtubules were required for GFLV MP trafficking to PD (Laporte et al., 2003). TuMV P3N-PIPO and CI were reported to utilize the early secretory pathway rather than the actomyosin motility system for their trafficking to PD (Wei et al., 2010). Several plant myosin motor proteins have been reported to participate in virus intracellular movement (Wei and Wang, 2008; Harries et al., 2010). Myosins VIII-1, VIII-2, and VIII-B were shown to transport a HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN70 homolog of Beet yellows virus to PD (Avisar et al., 2008a), but only myosin VIII-1 was needed for the nonstructural protein encoded by viral complementary strand of RNA4 (NSvc4) of Rice stripe virus traffic to PD (Yuan et al., 2011). A more recent study has indicated that both the secretory pathway and myosins XI-2 and XI-K were required for TuMV cell-to-cell movement (Agbeci et al., 2013). However, it remains largely unknown how the MP-interacting host factor(s) reach their target sites in cells.Tobacco vein banding mosaic virus (TVBMV) is a distinct potyvirus mainly infecting solanaceous crops (Tian et al., 2007; Yu et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011). In this article, we provide evidence showing the length requirements of the PIPO domains for its function in mediating TVBMV movement and the restoration of the movement-defective TVBMV mutants. We also show the interactions between TVBMV P3N-PIPO and CI and NbDREPP, a developmentally regulated plasma membrane protein in Nicotiana benthamiana, and the route by which NbDREPP traffics to PD. Silencing of NbDREPP expression in N. benthamiana significantly impeded the cell-to-cell movement of TVBMV.     

Heterodimeric Capping Protein from Arabidopsis Is a Membrane-Associated,Actin-Binding Protein

The actin cytoskeleton is a major regulator of cell morphogenesis and responses to biotic and abiotic stimuli. The organization and activities of the cytoskeleton are choreographed by hundreds of accessory proteins. Many actin-binding proteins are thought to be stimulus-response regulators that bind to signaling phospholipids and change their activity upon lipid binding. Whether these proteins associate with and/or are regulated by signaling lipids in plant cells remains poorly understood. Heterodimeric capping protein (CP) is a conserved and ubiquitous regulator of actin dynamics. It binds to the barbed end of filaments with high affinity and modulates filament assembly and disassembly reactions in vitro. Direct interaction of CP with phospholipids, including phosphatidic acid, results in uncapping of filament ends in vitro. Live-cell imaging and reverse-genetic analyses of cp mutants in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) recently provided compelling support for a model in which CP activity is negatively regulated by phosphatidic acid in vivo. Here, we used complementary biochemical, subcellular fractionation, and immunofluorescence microscopy approaches to elucidate CP-membrane association. We found that CP is moderately abundant in Arabidopsis tissues and present in a microsomal membrane fraction. Sucrose density gradient separation and immunoblotting with known compartment markers were used to demonstrate that CP is enriched on membrane-bound organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. This association could facilitate cross talk between the actin cytoskeleton and a wide spectrum of essential cellular functions such as organelle motility and signal transduction.The cellular levels of membrane-associated lipids undergo dynamic changes in response to developmental and environmental stimuli. Different species of phospholipids target specific proteins and this often affects the activity and/or subcellular localization of these lipid-binding proteins. One such membrane lipid, phosphatidic acid (PA), serves as a second messenger and regulates multiple developmental processes in plants, including seedling development, root hair growth and pattern formation, pollen tube growth, leaf senescence, and fruit ripening. PA levels also change during various stress responses, including high salinity and dehydration, pathogen attack, and cold tolerance (Testerink and Munnik, 2005, 2011; Wang, 2005; Li et al., 2009). In mammalian cells, PA is critical for vesicle trafficking events, such as vesicle budding from the Golgi apparatus, vesicle transport, exocytosis, endocytosis, and vesicle fusion (Liscovitch et al., 2000; Freyberg et al., 2003; Jenkins and Frohman, 2005).The actin cytoskeleton and a plethora of actin-binding proteins (ABPs) are well-known targets and transducers of lipid signaling (Drøbak et al., 2004; Saarikangas et al., 2010; Pleskot et al., 2013). For example, several ABPs have the ability to bind phosphoinositide lipids, such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PtdIns(4,5)P₂]. The severing or actin filament depolymerizing proteins such as villin, cofilin, and profilin are inhibited when bound to PtdIns(4,5)P₂. One ABP appears to be strongly regulated by another phospholipid; human gelsolin binds to lysophosphatidic acid and its filament severing and barbed-end capping activities are inhibited by this biologically active lipid (Meerschaert et al., 1998). Gelsolin is not, however, regulated by PA (Meerschaert et al., 1998), nor are profilin (Lassing and Lindberg, 1985), α-actinin (Fraley et al., 2003), or chicken CapZ (Schafer et al., 1996).The heterodimeric capping protein (CP) from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) also binds to and its activity is inhibited by phospholipids, including both PtdIns(4,5)P₂ and PA (Huang et al., 2003, 2006). PA and phospholipase D activity have been implicated in the actin-dependent tip growth of root hairs and pollen tubes (Ohashi et al., 2003; Potocký et al., 2003; Samaj et al., 2004; Monteiro et al., 2005a; Pleskot et al., 2010). Exogenous application of PA causes an elevation of actin filament levels in suspension cells, pollen, and Arabidopsis epidermal cells (Lee et al., 2003; Potocký et al., 2003; Huang et al., 2006; Li et al., 2012; Pleskot et al., 2013). Capping protein (CP) binds to the barbed end of actin filaments with high (nanomolar) affinity, dissociates quite slowly, and prevents the addition of actin subunits at this end (Huang et al., 2003, 2006; Kim et al., 2007). In the presence of phospholipids, AtCP is not able to bind to the barbed end of actin filaments (Huang et al., 2003, 2006). Furthermore, capped filament ends are uncapped by the addition of PA, allowing actin assembly from a pool of profilin-actin (Huang et al., 2006). Collectively, these data lead to a simple model whereby CP, working in concert with profilin-actin, serves to maintain tight regulation of actin assembly at filament barbed ends (Huang et al., 2006; Blanchoin et al., 2010; Henty-Ridilla et al., 2013; Pleskot et al., 2013). Furthermore, the availability of CP for filament ends can be modulated by fluxes in signaling lipids. Genetic evidence for this model was recently obtained by analyzing the dynamic behavior of actin filament ends in living Arabidopsis epidermal cells after treatment with exogenous PA (Li et al., 2012). Specifically, changes in the architecture of cortical actin arrays and dynamics of individual actin filaments that are induced by PA treatment were found to be attenuated in cp mutant cells (Li et al., 2012; Pleskot et al., 2013).Structural characterization of chicken CapZ demonstrates that the α- and β-subunits of the heterodimer form a compact structure resembling a mushroom with pseudo-two-fold rotational symmetry (Yamashita et al., 2003). Actin- and phospholipid-binding sites are conserved on the C-terminal regions, sometimes referred to as tentacles, which comprise amphipathic α-helices (Cooper and Sept, 2008; Pleskot et al., 2012). Coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG-MD) simulations recently revealed the mechanism of chicken and AtCP association with membranes (Pleskot et al., 2012). AtCP interacts specifically with lipid bilayers through interactions between PA and the amphipathic helix of the α-subunit tentacle. Extensive polar contacts between lipid headgroups and basic residues on CP (including K278, which is unique to plant CP), as well as partial embedding of nonpolar groups into the lipid bilayer, are observed (Pleskot et al., 2012). Moreover, a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein containing the C-terminal 38 amino acids from capping protein α subunit (CPA) is sufficient to bind PA-containing liposomes in vitro (Pleskot et al., 2012). Collectively, these findings lead us to predict that AtCP will behave like a membrane-associated protein in plant cells.Additional evidence from animal and microbial cells supports the association of CP with biological membranes. In Acanthamoeba castellanii, CP is localized primarily to the hyaline ectoplasm in a region of the cytoplasm just under the plasma membrane that contains a high concentration of actin filaments (Cooper et al., 1984). Localization of CP with regions rich in actin filaments and with membranes was supported by subcellular fractionation experiments, in which CP was associated with a crude membrane fraction that included plasma membrane (Cooper et al., 1984). Further evidence demonstrates that CP localizes to cortical actin patches at sites of new cell wall growth in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), including the site of bud emergence. By contrast, CP did not colocalize with actin cables in S. cerevisiae (Amatruda and Cooper, 1992). CP may localize to these sites by direct interactions with membrane lipids, through binding the ends of actin filaments, or by association with another protein different from actin. In support of this hypothesis, GFP-CP fusion proteins demonstrate that sites of actin assembling in living cells contain both CP and the actin-related protein2/3 (Arp2/3) complex, and CP is located in two types of structures: (1) motile regions of the cell periphery, which reflect movement of the edge of the lamella during extension and ruffling; and (2) dynamic spots within the lamella (Schafer et al., 1998). CP has been colocalized to the F-actin patches in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Kovar et al., 2005), which promotes Arp2/3-dependent nucleation and branching and limits the extent of filament elongation (Akin and Mullins, 2008). These findings lend additional support for a model whereby CP cooperates with the Arp2/3 complex to regulate actin dynamics (Nakano and Mabuchi, 2006). Activities and localization of other plant ABPs are linked to membranes. Membrane association has been linked to the assembly status of the ARP2/3 complex, an actin filament nucleator, in Arabidopsis (Kotchoni et al., 2009). SPIKE1 (SPK1), a Rho of plants (Rop)-guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and peripheral membrane protein, maintains the homeostasis of the early secretory pathway and signal integration during morphogenesis through specialized domains in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; Zhang et al., 2010). Furthermore, Nck-associated protein1 (NAP1), a component of the suppressor of cAMP receptor/WASP-family verprolin homology protein (SCAR/WAVE) complex, strongly associates with membranes and is particularly enriched in ER membranes (Zhang et al., 2013a). Finally, a superfamily of plant ABPs, called NETWORKED proteins, was recently discovered; these link the actin cytoskeleton to various cellular membranes (Deeks et al., 2012; Hawkins et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014).In this work, we demonstrate that CP is a membrane-associated protein in Arabidopsis. To our knowledge, this is the first direct evidence for CP-membrane association in plants. This interaction likely targets CP to cellular compartments such as the ER and Golgi. This unique location may allow CP to remodel the actin cytoskeleton in the vicinity of endomembrane compartments and/or to respond rapidly to fluxes in signaling lipids.     

Composition,Assembly, and Trafficking of a Wheat Xylan Synthase Complex

Xylans play an important role in plant cell wall integrity and have many industrial applications. Characterization of xylan synthase (XS) complexes responsible for the synthesis of these polymers is currently lacking. We recently purified XS activity from etiolated wheat (Triticum aestivum) seedlings. To further characterize this purified activity, we analyzed its protein composition and assembly. Proteomic analysis identified six main proteins: two glycosyltransferases (GTs) TaGT43-4 and TaGT47-13; two putative mutases (TaGT75-3 and TaGT75-4) and two non-GTs; a germin-like protein (TaGLP); and a vernalization related protein (TaVER2). Coexpression of TaGT43-4, TaGT47-13, TaGT75-3, and TaGT75-4 in Pichia pastoris confirmed that these proteins form a complex. Confocal microscopy showed that all these proteins interact in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) but the complexes accumulate in Golgi, and TaGT43-4 acts as a scaffold protein that holds the other proteins. Furthermore, ER export of the complexes is dependent of the interaction between TaGT43-4 and TaGT47-13. Immunogold electron microscopy data support the conclusion that complex assembly occurs at specific areas of the ER before export to the Golgi. A di-Arg motif and a long sequence motif within the transmembrane domains were found conserved at the NH₂-terminal ends of TaGT43-4 and homologous proteins from diverse taxa. These conserved motifs may control the forward trafficking of the complexes and their accumulation in the Golgi. Our findings indicate that xylan synthesis in grasses may involve a new regulatory mechanism linking complex assembly with forward trafficking and provide new insights that advance our understanding of xylan biosynthesis and regulation in plants.It is believed that Golgi-localized, multiprotein complexes synthesize plant hemicellulosic polysaccharides, including xylans. Such complexes are not well characterized in plants (Zeng et al., 2010; Atmodjo et al., 2011; Chou et al., 2012), which is in sharp contrast with mammalian and yeast cells (Jungmann and Munro, 1998; McCormick et al., 2000; Giraudo et al., 2001). Xylans are the most abundant plant hemicellulosic polysaccharides on Earth and play an important role in the integrity of cell walls, which is a key factor in plant growth. Any mutations affecting xylan backbone biosynthesis seem to result in abnormal growth of plants due mostly to thinning and weakening of secondary xylem walls, described as the irregular xylem (irx) phenotype. Thus, characterizing the xylan synthase complex (XSC) would have an impact on plant improvement, as well as many industrial applications related to food, feed, and biofuel production (Yang and Wyman, 2004; Faik, 2010). Although the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) irx mutants have revealed the involvement of several glycosyltransferase (GT) gene families in xylan biosynthesis (Brown et al., 2007, 2009; Lee et al., 2007, 2010; Wu et al., 2009, 2010), no XSCs have been purified/isolated from Arabidopsis tissues, and we still do not know whether some of the identified Arabidopsis GTs can assemble into functional XSCs. Furthermore, if GTs do assemble into XSCs, we don’t know the mechanisms by which plant cells control their assembly and cellular trafficking. In contrast to dicots, xylan synthase activity was recently immunopurified from etiolated wheat (Triticum aestivum) microsomes (Zeng et al., 2010). This purified wheat XS activity was shown to catalyze three activities, xylan-glucuronosyltransferase (XGlcAT), xylan-xylosyltransferase (XXylT), and xylan-arabinofuranosyltranferase (XAT), which work synergistically to synthesize xylan-type polymers in vitro (Zeng et al., 2008, 2010). This work focuses on describing protein composition, assembly, and trafficking of this purified wheat XS activity.In all eukaryotes, proteins of the secretory pathway (including GTs) are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and modified as they go through the Golgi cisternae. Most proteins exit the ER from ER export sites (ERESs; Hanton et al., 2009) and use a signal-based sorting mechanism that allows them to be selectively recruited into vesicles coated by coat protein II complexes (Barlowe, 2003; Beck et al., 2008). For many Golgi-resident type II membrane proteins, di-Arg motifs, such as RR, RXR, and RRR located in their cytosolic NH₂-terminal ends, have been shown to be required for their ER export (Giraudo et al., 2003; Czlapinski and Bertozzi, 2006; Schoberer et al., 2009; Tu and Banfield, 2010). Interestingly, di-Arg motifs located ∼40 amino acids from the membrane on the cytosolic side can also be used to retrieve some type II ER-resident proteins from cis-Golgi (Schutze et al., 1994; Hardt et al., 2003; Boulaflous et al., 2009). In contrast to the signal-based sorting mechanism involved in trafficking between the ER and Golgi, the steady-state localization/retention of proteins (including GTs) in the Golgi is thought to occur through vesicular cycling. Cycling is influenced by various mechanisms, including the length and composition of the transmembrane domain (TMD) of type II GTs (Bretscher and Munro, 1993; Colley, 1997; van Vliet et al., 2003; Sousa et al., 2003; Sharpe et al., 2010), and the oligomerization/aggregation of GTs (kin hypothesis), which suggests that formation of homo- or heterooligomers of GTs in the Golgi may prevent their recruitment into clathrin-coated vesicles (Machamer, 1991; Nilsson et al., 1993; Weisz et al., 1993; Cole et al., 1996). Some Golgi-resident GTs are predicted to have a cleavable NH₂-terminal secretion signal peptide (SP) and would therefore exist as soluble proteins in the Golgi lumen. To maintain their proper Golgi localization, these processed GTs are likely part of multiprotein complexes anchored to integral membrane proteins. The fact that homologs of many of the trafficking proteins from mammalian and yeast cells are found in plants indicates that trafficking machineries of the plant secretory pathway are likely conserved (d’Enfert et al., 1992; Bar-Peled and Raikhel, 1997; Batoko et al., 2000; Pimpl et al., 2000; Phillipson et al., 2001; Hawes et al., 2008).It is becoming increasingly evident that understanding the mechanisms controlling protein-protein interaction, sorting, and trafficking of polysaccharide synthases (including XSCs) will help elucidate how plants regulate cell wall synthesis and deposition during their development. To this end, we believe that the purified wheat XS activity (Zeng et al., 2010) is an excellent model for this type of study. In this work, proteomics was used to determine the protein composition of the purified XS activity. Confocal microscopy and immunogold transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to investigate the assembly and trafficking of the complex. Our proteomics data showed that the purified activity contains two GTs, TaGT43-4 and TaGT47-13, two putative mutases, TaGT75-3 and TaGT75-4, and two non-GT proteins: a germin-like protein (TaGLP) belonging to cupin superfamily and a protein specific to monocots annotated as wheat vernalization-related protein 2 (TaVER2). Microscopy analyses revealed that all these proteins interact in the ER, but the assembled complexes accumulate in the Golgi. Export of these complexes from the ER is controlled by the interaction between TaGT43-4 and TaGT47-13. Characterization of the wheat XSC and its trafficking furthers our understanding of xylan biosynthesis in grasses and helps elucidate how polysaccharide synthase complexes are assembled, sorted, and maintained in different compartments of the secretory pathway.     

The Endoplasmic Reticulum Is a Reservoir for WAVE/SCAR Regulatory Complex Signaling in the Arabidopsis Leaf

During plant cell morphogenesis, signal transduction and cytoskeletal dynamics interact to locally organize the cytoplasm and define the geometry of cell expansion. The WAVE/SCAR (for WASP family verprolin homologous/suppressor of cyclic AMP receptor) regulatory complex (W/SRC) is an evolutionarily conserved heteromeric protein complex. Within the plant kingdom W/SRC is a broadly used effector that converts Rho-of-Plants (ROP)/Rac small GTPase signals into Actin-Related Protein2/3 and actin-dependent growth responses. Although the components and biochemistry of the W/SRC pathway are well understood, a basic understanding of how cells partition W/SRC into active and inactive pools is lacking. In this paper, we report that the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an important organelle for W/SRC regulation. We determined that a large intracellular pool of the core W/SRC subunit NAP1, like the known positive regulator of W/SRC, the DOCK family guanine nucleotide-exchange factor SPIKE1 (SPK1), localizes to the surface of the ER. The ER-associated NAP1 is inactive because it displays little colocalization with the actin network, and ER localization requires neither activating signals from SPK1 nor a physical association with its W/SRC-binding partner, SRA1. Our results indicate that in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) leaf pavement cells and trichomes, the ER is a reservoir for W/SRC signaling and may have a key role in the early steps of W/SRC assembly and/or activation.The W/SRC (for WASP family verprolin homologous/suppressor of cAMP receptor regulatory complex) and Actin-Related Protein (ARP)2/3 complex are part of an evolutionarily conserved Rho-of-Plants (ROP)/Rac small GTPase signal transduction cascade that controls actin-dependent morphogenesis in a wide variety of tissues and developmental contexts (Smith and Oppenheimer, 2005; Szymanski, 2005; Yalovsky et al., 2008). Many of the components and regulatory relationships among the complexes were discovered based on the stage-specific cell-swelling and -twisting phenotypes of the distorted class of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) trichome mutants (Szymanski et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2005, 2008; Djakovic et al., 2006; Le et al., 2006; Uhrig et al., 2007). However, in both maize (Zea mays) and Arabidopsis, W/SRC and/or ARP2/3 are required for normal pavement cell morphogenesis (Frank and Smith, 2002; Mathur et al., 2003b; Brembu et al., 2004). Compared with other Arabidopsis pavement cell mutants, the shape defects of the distorted group are relatively mild. However, the distorted mutants and spike1 (spk1) differ from most other morphology mutants in that they display gaps in the shoot epidermis, most frequently at the interface of pavement cells and stomata (Qiu et al., 2002; Le et al., 2003; Li et al., 2003; Mathur et al., 2003b; Zhang et al., 2005; Djakovic et al., 2006). The cell gaps may reflect either uncoordinated growth between neighboring cells or defective cortical actin-dependent secretion of polysaccharides and/or proteins that promote cell-cell adhesion (Smith and Oppenheimer, 2005; Hussey et al., 2006; Leucci et al., 2007).In tip-growing cells, there is a strict requirement for actin to organize the trafficking and secretion activities of the cell to restrict growth to the apex. In Arabidopsis, the W/SRC-ARP2/3 pathway is not an essential tip growth component, because null alleles of both W/SRC and ARP2/3 subunits do not cause noticeable pollen tube or root hair phenotypes (Le et al., 2003; Djakovic et al., 2006). However, reverse genetic analysis of the W/SRC subunit BRK1 and ARP2/3 in the tip-growing protonemal cells of Physcomitrella patens revealed the obvious importance of this pathway (Harries et al., 2005; Perroud and Quatrano, 2008). Along similar lines, in two different legume species, W/SRC subunits are required for a normal root nodulation response to symbiotic bacteria (Yokota et al., 2009; Miyahara et al., 2010), indicating a conditional importance for this pathway in root hair growth. These genetic studies centered on the W/SRC and ARP2/3 pathways, in addition to those that involve a broader collection of actin-based morphology mutants (Smith and Oppenheimer, 2005; Blanchoin et al., 2010), are defining important cytoskeletal proteins and new interactions with the endomembrane system during morphogenesis. However, it is not completely clear how unstable actin filaments and actin bundle networks dictate the growth patterns of cells (Staiger et al., 2009).The difficulty of understanding the functions of specific actin arrays can be explained, in part, by the fact that plant cells that employ a diffuse growth mechanism have highly unstable cortical actin filaments and large actin bundles that do not have a geometry that obviously relates to the direction of growth or a specific subcellular activity (Blanchoin et al., 2010). This is in contrast to the cortical endocytic actin patches in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Evangelista et al., 2002; Kaksonen et al., 2003) and cortical meshworks in the lamellipodia of crawling cells (Pollard and Borisy, 2003) that reveal subcellular locations where actin works to locally control membrane dynamics. In thick-walled plant cells, the magnitude of the forces that accompany turgor-driven cell expansion exceed those that could be generated by actin polymerization by orders of magnitude (Szymanski and Cosgrove, 2009). Localized cell wall loosening or the assembly of an anisotropic cell wall generates asymmetric yielding responses to turgor-induced stress (Baskin, 2005; Cosgrove, 2005). Therefore, the actin-based control of cell boundary dynamics is indirect, and the actin cytoskeleton influences cell shape change, in part, by actin and/or myosin-dependent trafficking of hormone transporters (Geldner et al., 2001) and organelles (Prokhnevsky et al., 2008), including those that control the localized delivery of protein complexes and polysaccharides that pattern the cell wall (Leucci et al., 2007; Gutierrez et al., 2009). In this scheme for actin-based growth control, the actin network dynamically rearranges at spatial scales that span from approximately 1- to 10-µm subcellular domains that may locally position organelles (Cleary, 1995; Gibbon et al., 1999; Szymanski et al., 1999) to the more than 100-µm actin bundle networks that operate at the spatial scales of entire cells (Gutierrez et al., 2009; Dyachok et al., 2011). It is clear from the work of several laboratories that the W/SRC and ARP2/3 protein complexes are required to organize cortical actin and actin bundle networks in trichomes (Szymanski et al., 1999; Le et al., 2003; Deeks et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005) and cylindrical epidermal cells (Mathur et al., 2003b; Dyachok et al., 2008, 2011). A key challenge now is to understand how plant cells deploy these approximately 10- to 20-nm heteromeric protein complexes to influence the patterns of growth at cellular scales.The genetic and biochemical control of ARP2/3 is complicated, but this is a tractable problem in plants, because the pathway is relatively simple compared with most other species in which it has been characterized. For example, in organisms ranging from yeast to humans, there are multiple types of ARP2/3 activators, protein complexes, and pathways that activate ARP2/3 (Welch and Mullins, 2002; Derivery and Gautreau, 2010). However, the maize and Arabidopsis genomes encode only WAVE/SCAR homologous proteins that can potently activate ARP2/3 (Frank et al., 2004; Basu et al., 2005). Detailed genetic and biochemical analyses of the WAVE/SCAR gene family in Arabidopsis demonstrated that the plant activators function interchangeably within the context of the W/SRC and define the lone pathway for ARP2/3 activation (Zhang et al., 2008). Bioinformatic analyses are consistent with a prominent role for W/SRC in the angiosperms, because in general, WASH complex subunits, which are structurally similar to WAVE/SCAR proteins, are largely absent from the higher plant genomes, while WAVE/SCAR genes are highly conserved (Kollmar et al., 2012).The components and regulatory schemes of the W/SRC-ARP2/3 pathway in Arabidopsis and P. patens are conserved compared with vertebrate species that employ these same protein complexes (Szymanski, 2005). For example, mutant complementation tests indicate that human W/SRC and ARP2/3 complex subunits can substitute for the Arabidopsis proteins (Mathur et al., 2003b). Furthermore, biochemical assays of Arabidopsis W/SRC (Basu et al., 2004; El-Assal et al., 2004; Frank et al., 2004; Le et al., 2006; Uhrig et al., 2007) and ARP2/3 assembly (Kotchoni et al., 2009) have shown that the binary interactions among W/SRC subunits and ARP2/3 complex assembly mechanisms are indistinguishable from those that have been observed for human W/SRC (Gautreau et al., 2004) and yeast ARP2/3 (Winter et al., 1999). After an initial period of controversy concerning the biochemical control of W/SRC, it is now apparent that vertebrate W/SRC (Derivery et al., 2009; Ismail et al., 2009), like the ARP2/3 complex (Machesky et al., 1999), is intrinsically inactive and requires positive regulation by Rac and other factors to fully activate ARP2/3 (Ismail et al., 2009; Lebensohn and Kirschner, 2009; Chen et al., 2010). Although overexpression of dominant negative ROP mutants causes trichome swelling and a reduced trichome branch number (Fu et al., 2002), the involvement of ROPs in trichome morphogenesis has been difficult to prove with a loss-of-function ROP allele because so many ROPs are expressed in this cell type (Marks et al., 2009). Existing reports on ROP loss-of-function mutants demonstrate the importance of pavement cell morphogenesis but do not document a trichome phenotype (Fu et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2010). A recent report describes a clever strategy to generate ROP loss-of-function lines that used the ectopic expression of ROP-specific bacterial toxins. There was a strong association between inducible expression of the toxins and the appearance of trichomes with severe trichome swelling and reduced branch number phenotypes (Singh et al., 2012). Although the exact mechanism of ROP-dependent control of W/SRC remains to be determined, the results described above in combination with the detection of direct interactions between the ROPGEF SPK1, active forms of ROP, and W/SRC subunits (Basu et al., 2004, 2008; Uhrig et al., 2007) strongly suggest that W/SRC is a ROP effector complex.The major challenge in the field now is to better understand the cellular control of W/SRC and how the complex is partitioned into active and inactive pools. In mammalian cells that crawl on a solid substrate, current models propose that a cytosolic pool of inactive WAVE/SCAR proteins and W/SRC is locally recruited and activated at specific plasma membrane surfaces in response to signals from some unknown Rac guanine nucleotide-exchange factor (GEF), protein kinase, and/or lipid kinase (Oikawa et al., 2004; Lebensohn and Kirschner, 2009; Chen et al., 2010). However, in Drosophila melanogaster neurons (Bogdan and Klämbt, 2003) and cultured human melanoma cells (Steffen et al., 2004), there are large pools of W/SRC with a perinuclear or organelle-like punctate localization that has no obvious relationship to cell shape or motility, raising uncertainty about the cellular mechanisms of W/SRC activation and the importance of different subcellular pools of the complex.In plants, cell fractionation experiments indicate that SCAR1 and ARP2/3 have an increased association with membranes compared with their animal counterparts (Dyachok et al., 2008; Kotchoni et al., 2009). In tip-growing moss protonemal cells, both the W/SRC subunit BRK1 and ARP2/3 localize to a population of unidentified organelles within the apical zone (Perroud and Quatrano, 2008). Similar live-cell imaging experiments in Arabidopsis reported a plasma membrane localization for SCAR1 and BRK1 in a variety of shoot epidermal and root cortex, and their accumulation at young trichome branch tips and at three-way cell wall junctions may define subcellular domains for W/SRC-ARP2/3-dependent actin filament nucleation at the plasma membrane (Dyachok et al., 2008). However, to our knowledge, active W/SRC, defined here as the fraction of W/SRC that colocalizes with ARP2/3 or actin, has not been reported in plants, and the plasma membrane is not necessarily the only organelle involved in W/SRC regulation. For example, the reported accumulation of BRK1 and SCAR1 at three-way cell wall junctions has a punctate appearance at the cell cortex that may not simply correspond to the plasma membrane (Dyachok et al., 2008). Also, in young stage 4 trichomes, there was an uncharacterized pool of intracellular SCAR1, but not BRK1, that localized to relatively large punctate structures (Dyachok et al., 2008). The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) may also be involved in W/SRC regulation. The ER-localized DOCK family ROPGEF SPK1 (Zhang et al., 2010) physically associates with multiple W/SRC proteins (Uhrig et al., 2007; Basu et al., 2008) and, based on genetic criteria, is an upstream, positive regulator of the W/SRC-ARP2/3 pathway (Basu et al., 2008). In the leaf, one function of SPK1 is to promote normal trafficking between the ER and Golgi; however, arp2/3 mutants do not share ER-stress phenotypes with spk1 (Zhang et al., 2010), making it unclear if SPK1 and the ER are directly involved in W/SRC signaling.This paper focuses on the localization and control of the W/SRC subunit NAP1/GNARLED/NAPP/HEM1/2. Arabidopsis NAP1 directly interacts with the ROP/Rac effector subunit SRA1/PIROGI/KLUNKER/PIRP (Basu et al., 2004; El-Assal et al., 2004; Uhrig et al., 2007). Based on the equally severe syndrome of nap1 and arp2/3 null phenotypes, and double mutant analyses, the only known function of NAP1 is to positively regulate ARP2/3 (Brembu et al., 2004; Deeks et al., 2004; El-Din El-Assal et al., 2004; Li et al., 2004). The vertebrate SRA1-NAP1 dimer is important for W/SRC assembly (Gautreau et al., 2004) and forms an extended physical surface that trans-inhibits the C-terminal ARP2/3-activating domain of WAVE/SCAR (Chen et al., 2010). The plant NAP1 and SRA1 proteins share end-to-end amino acid conservation with their vertebrate homologs and may form a heterodimer with similar functions (Basu et al., 2004; El-Assal et al., 2004; Uhrig et al., 2007). We report here that Arabidopsis NAP1 is strongly associated with ER membranes. In a detailed series of localization experiments, we detect a complicated intracellular distribution of NAP1 among the ER, the nucleus, and unidentified submicrometer punctae. A large pool of ER-associated NAP1 is inactive, based on the low level of colocalization with actin.Its accumulation on the ER does not require activating signals from either SPK1 or SRA1. These data indicate that the ER is a reservoir for W/SRC signaling and suggest that early steps in the positive regulation of NAP1 and the W/SRC occur on the ER surface.