Identification of novel families of membrane proteins from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana

MOTIVATION: The completion of the Arabidopsis genome offers the first opportunity to analyze all of the membrane protein sequences of a plant. The majority of integral membrane proteins including transporters, channels, and pumps contain hydrophobic alpha-helices and can be selected based on TransMembrane Spanning (TMS) domain prediction. By clustering the predicted membrane proteins based on sequence, it is possible to sort the membrane proteins into families of known function, based on experimental evidence or homology, or unknown function. This provides a way to identify target sequences for future functional analysis. RESULTS: An automated approach was used to select potential membrane protein sequences from the set of all predicted proteins and cluster the sequences into related families. The recently completed sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana, a model plant, was analyzed. Of the 25,470 predicted protein sequences 4589 (18%) were identified as containing two or more membrane spanning domains. The membrane protein sequences clustered into 628 distinct families containing 3208 sequences. Of these, 211 families (1764 sequences) either contained proteins of known function or showed homology to proteins of known function in other species. However, 417 families (1444 sequences) contained only sequences with no known function and no homology to proteins of known function. In addition, 1381 sequences did not cluster with any family and no function could be assigned to 1337 of these.     

The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: Expanding the Universe of Protein Families

Metagenomics projects based on shotgun sequencing of populations of micro-organisms yield insight into protein families. We used sequence similarity clustering to explore proteins with a comprehensive dataset consisting of sequences from available databases together with 6.12 million proteins predicted from an assembly of 7.7 million Global Ocean Sampling (GOS) sequences. The GOS dataset covers nearly all known prokaryotic protein families. A total of 3,995 medium- and large-sized clusters consisting of only GOS sequences are identified, out of which 1,700 have no detectable homology to known families. The GOS-only clusters contain a higher than expected proportion of sequences of viral origin, thus reflecting a poor sampling of viral diversity until now. Protein domain distributions in the GOS dataset and current protein databases show distinct biases. Several protein domains that were previously categorized as kingdom specific are shown to have GOS examples in other kingdoms. About 6,000 sequences (ORFans) from the literature that heretofore lacked similarity to known proteins have matches in the GOS data. The GOS dataset is also used to improve remote homology detection. Overall, besides nearly doubling the number of current proteins, the predicted GOS proteins also add a great deal of diversity to known protein families and shed light on their evolution. These observations are illustrated using several protein families, including phosphatases, proteases, ultraviolet-irradiation DNA damage repair enzymes, glutamine synthetase, and RuBisCO. The diversity added by GOS data has implications for choosing targets for experimental structure characterization as part of structural genomics efforts. Our analysis indicates that new families are being discovered at a rate that is linear or almost linear with the addition of new sequences, implying that we are still far from discovering all protein families in nature.     

The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: Expanding the Universe of Protein Families

Metagenomics projects based on shotgun sequencing of populations of micro-organisms yield insight into protein families. We used sequence similarity clustering to explore proteins with a comprehensive dataset consisting of sequences from available databases together with 6.12 million proteins predicted from an assembly of 7.7 million Global Ocean Sampling (GOS) sequences. The GOS dataset covers nearly all known prokaryotic protein families. A total of 3,995 medium- and large-sized clusters consisting of only GOS sequences are identified, out of which 1,700 have no detectable homology to known families. The GOS-only clusters contain a higher than expected proportion of sequences of viral origin, thus reflecting a poor sampling of viral diversity until now. Protein domain distributions in the GOS dataset and current protein databases show distinct biases. Several protein domains that were previously categorized as kingdom specific are shown to have GOS examples in other kingdoms. About 6,000 sequences (ORFans) from the literature that heretofore lacked similarity to known proteins have matches in the GOS data. The GOS dataset is also used to improve remote homology detection. Overall, besides nearly doubling the number of current proteins, the predicted GOS proteins also add a great deal of diversity to known protein families and shed light on their evolution. These observations are illustrated using several protein families, including phosphatases, proteases, ultraviolet-irradiation DNA damage repair enzymes, glutamine synthetase, and RuBisCO. The diversity added by GOS data has implications for choosing targets for experimental structure characterization as part of structural genomics efforts. Our analysis indicates that new families are being discovered at a rate that is linear or almost linear with the addition of new sequences, implying that we are still far from discovering all protein families in nature.     

Oceanic Metagenomics: The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: Expanding the Universe of Protein Families

Metagenomics projects based on shotgun sequencing of populations of micro-organisms yield insight into protein families. We used sequence similarity clustering to explore proteins with a comprehensive dataset consisting of sequences from available databases together with 6.12 million proteins predicted from an assembly of 7.7 million Global Ocean Sampling (GOS) sequences. The GOS dataset covers nearly all known prokaryotic protein families. A total of 3,995 medium- and large-sized clusters consisting of only GOS sequences are identified, out of which 1,700 have no detectable homology to known families. The GOS-only clusters contain a higher than expected proportion of sequences of viral origin, thus reflecting a poor sampling of viral diversity until now. Protein domain distributions in the GOS dataset and current protein databases show distinct biases. Several protein domains that were previously categorized as kingdom specific are shown to have GOS examples in other kingdoms. About 6,000 sequences (ORFans) from the literature that heretofore lacked similarity to known proteins have matches in the GOS data. The GOS dataset is also used to improve remote homology detection. Overall, besides nearly doubling the number of current proteins, the predicted GOS proteins also add a great deal of diversity to known protein families and shed light on their evolution. These observations are illustrated using several protein families, including phosphatases, proteases, ultraviolet-irradiation DNA damage repair enzymes, glutamine synthetase, and RuBisCO. The diversity added by GOS data has implications for choosing targets for experimental structure characterization as part of structural genomics efforts. Our analysis indicates that new families are being discovered at a rate that is linear or almost linear with the addition of new sequences, implying that we are still far from discovering all protein families in nature.     

Pfam 10 years on: 10,000 families and still growing

Classifications of proteins into groups of related sequences are in some respects like a periodic table for biology, allowing us to understand the underlying molecular biology of any organism. Pfam is a large collection of protein domains and families. Its scientific goal is to provide a complete and accurate classification of protein families and domains. The next release of the database will contain over 10,000 entries, which leads us to reflect on how far we are from completing this work. Currently Pfam matches 72% of known protein sequences, but for proteins with known structure Pfam matches 95%, which we believe represents the likely upper bound. Based on our analysis a further 28,000 families would be required to achieve this level of coverage for the current sequence database. We also show that as more sequences are added to the sequence databases the fraction of sequences that Pfam matches is reduced, suggesting that continued addition of new families is essential to maintain its relevance.     

ProtoMap: automatic classification of protein sequences, a hierarchy of protein families, and local maps of the protein space

We investigate the space of all protein sequences in search of clusters of related proteins. Our aim is to automatically detect these sets, and thus obtain a classification of all protein sequences. Our analysis, which uses standard measures of sequence similarity as applied to an all-vs.-all comparison of SWISSPROT, gives a very conservative initial classification based on the highest scoring pairs. The many classes in this classification correspond to protein subfamilies. Subsequently we merge the subclasses using the weaker pairs in a two-phase clustering algorithm. The algorithm makes use of transitivity to identify homologous proteins; however, transitivity is applied restrictively in an attempt to prevent unrelated proteins from clustering together. This process is repeated at varying levels of statistical significance. Consequently, a hierarchical organization of all proteins is obtained. The resulting classification splits the protein space into well-defined groups of proteins, which are closely correlated with natural biological families and superfamilies. Different indices of validity were applied to assess the quality of our classification and compare it with the protein families in the PROSITE and Pfam databases. Our classification agrees with these domain-based classifications for between 64.8% and 88.5% of the proteins. It also finds many new clusters of protein sequences which were not classified by these databases. The hierarchical organization suggested by our analysis reveals finer subfamilies in families of known proteins as well as many novel relations between protein families.     

Sequence variations within protein families are linearly related to structural variations

It is commonly believed that similarities between the sequences of two proteins infer similarities between their structures. Sequence alignments reliably recognize pairs of protein of similar structures provided that the percentage sequence identity between their two sequences is sufficiently high. This distinction, however, is statistically less reliable when the percentage sequence identity is lower than 30% and little is known then about the detailed relationship between the two measures of similarity. Here, we investigate the inverse correlation between structural similarity and sequence similarity on 12 protein structure families. We define the structure similarity between two proteins as the cRMS distance between their structures. The sequence similarity for a pair of proteins is measured as the mean distance between the sequences in the subsets of sequence space compatible with their structures. We obtain an approximation of the sequence space compatible with a protein by designing a collection of protein sequences both stable and specific to the structure of that protein. Using these measures of sequence and structure similarities, we find that structural changes within a protein family are linearly related to changes in sequence similarity.     

Recognizing very distant sequence relationships among proteins by family profile analysis.

Family profile analysis (FPA), described in this paper, compares all available homologous amino acid sequences of a target family with the profile of a probe family while conventional sequence profile analysis (Gribskov M, Lüthy R, Eisenberg D. Meth Enzymol 1990;183:146-159) considers only a single target sequence in comparison with the probe family. The increased input of sequence information in FPA expands the range for sequence-based recognition of structural relationships. In the FPA algorithm, Zscores of each of the target sequences, obtained from a probe profile search over all known amino acid sequences, are averaged and then compared with the scores for sequences of 100 reference families in the same probe family search. The resulting F-Zscore of the target family, expressed in "effective standard deviations" of the mean Zscores of the reference families, with value above a threshold of 3.5 indicates a statistically significant evolutionary relationship between the target and probe families. The sensitivity of FPA to sequence information was tested with several protein families where distant relationships have been verified from known tertiary protein architectures, which included vitamin B6-dependent enzymes, (beta/alpha)8-barrel proteins, beta-trefoil proteins, and globins. In comparison to other methods, FPA proved to be significantly more sensitive, finding numerous new homologies. The FPA technique is not only useful to test a suspected relationship between probe and target families but also identifies possible target families in profile searches over all known primary structures.     

A comparison of sequence and structure protein domain families as a basis for structural genomics.

MOTIVATION: Protein families can be defined based on structure or sequence similarity. We wanted to compare two protein family databases, one based on structural and one on sequence similarity, to investigate to what extent they overlap, the similarity in definition of corresponding families, and to create a list of large protein families with unknown structure as a resource for structural genomics. We also wanted to increase the sensitivity of fold assignment by exploiting protein family HMMs. RESULTS: We compared Pfam, a protein family database based on sequence similarity, to Scop, which is based on structural similarity. We found that 70% of the Scop families exist in Pfam while 57% of the Pfam families exist in Scop. Most families that occur in both databases correspond well to each other, but in some cases they are different. Such cases highlight situations in which structure and sequence approaches differ significantly. The comparison enabled us to compile a list of the largest families that do not occur in Scop; these are suitable targets for structure prediction and determination, and may be useful to guide projects in structural genomics. It can be noted that 13 out of the 20 largest protein families without a known structure are likely transmembrane proteins. We also exploited Pfam to increase the sensitivity of detecting homologs of proteins with known structure, by comparing query sequences to Pfam HMMs that correspond to Scop families. For SWISSPROT+TREMBL, this yielded an increase in fold assignment from 31% to 42% compared to using FASTA only. This method assigned a structure to 22% of the proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 24% in Escherichia coli, and 16% in Methanococcus jannaschii.     

Fold recognition and accurate sequence-structure alignment of sequences directing beta-sheet proteins

The ability to predict structure from sequence is particularly important for toxins, virulence factors, allergens, cytokines, and other proteins of public health importance. Many such functions are represented in the parallel beta-helix and beta-trefoil families. A method using pairwise beta-strand interaction probabilities coupled with evolutionary information represented by sequence profiles is developed to tackle these problems for the beta-helix and beta-trefoil folds. The algorithm BetaWrapPro employs a "wrapping" component that may capture folding processes with an initiation stage followed by processive interaction of the sequence with the already-formed motifs. BetaWrapPro outperforms all previous motif recognition programs for these folds, recognizing the beta-helix with 100% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity and the beta-trefoil with 100% sensitivity and 92.5% specificity, in crossvalidation on a database of all nonredundant known positive and negative examples of these fold classes in the PDB. It additionally aligns 88% of residues for the beta-helices and 86% for the beta-trefoils accurately (within four residues of the exact position) to the structural template, which is then used with the side-chain packing program SCWRL to produce 3D structure predictions. One striking result has been the prediction of an unexpected parallel beta-helix structure for a pollen allergen, and its recent confirmation through solution of its structure. A Web server running BetaWrapPro is available and outputs putative PDB-style coordinates for sequences predicted to form the target folds.     

Post-Messinian evolutionary relationships across the Sicilian channel: Mitochondrial and nuclear markers link a new green toad from Sicily to African relatives

Background

The major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, is a member of the ubiquitous PR-10 family of plant pathogenesis-related proteins. In recent years, a number of diverse plant proteins with low sequence similarity to Bet v 1 was identified. In addition, determination of the Bet v 1 structure revealed the existence of a large superfamily of structurally related proteins. In this study, we aimed to identify and classify all Bet v 1-related structures from the Protein Data Bank and all Bet v 1-related sequences from the Uniprot database.

Results

Structural comparisons of representative members of already known protein families structurally related to Bet v 1 with all entries of the Protein Data Bank yielded 47 structures with non-identical sequences. They were classified into eleven families, five of which were newly identified and not included in the Structural Classification of Proteins database release 1.71. The taxonomic distribution of these families extracted from the Pfam protein family database showed that members of the polyketide cyclase family and the activator of Hsp90 ATPase homologue 1 family were distributed among all three superkingdoms, while members of some bacterial families were confined to a small number of species. Comparison of ligand binding activities of Bet v 1-like superfamily members revealed that their functions were related to binding and metabolism of large, hydrophobic compounds such as lipids, hormones, and antibiotics. Phylogenetic relationships within the Bet v 1 family, defined as the group of proteins with significant sequence similarity to Bet v 1, were determined by aligning 264 Bet v 1-related sequences. A distance-based phylogenetic tree yielded a classification into 11 subfamilies, nine exclusively containing plant sequences and two subfamilies of bacterial proteins. Plant sequences included the pathogenesis-related proteins 10, the major latex proteins/ripening-related proteins subfamily, and polyketide cyclase-like sequences.

Conclusion

The ubiquitous distribution of Bet v 1-related proteins among all superkingdoms suggests that a Bet v 1-like protein was already present in the last universal common ancestor. During evolution, this protein diversified into numerous families with low sequence similarity but with a common fold that succeeded as a versatile scaffold for binding of bulky ligands.     

SUPFAM—a database of potential protein superfamily relationships derived by comparing sequence-based and structure-based families: implications for structural genomics and function annotation in genomes

Members of a superfamily of proteins could result from divergent evolution of homologues with insignificant similarity in the amino acid sequences. A superfamily relationship is detected commonly after the three-dimensional structures of the proteins are determined using X-ray analysis or NMR. The SUPFAM database described here relates two homologous protein families in a multiple sequence alignment database of either known or unknown structure. The present release (1.1), which is the first version of the SUPFAM database, has been derived by analysing Pfam, which is one of the commonly used databases of multiple sequence alignments of homologous proteins. The first step in establishing SUPFAM is to relate Pfam families with the families in PALI, which is an alignment database of homologous proteins of known structure that is derived largely from SCOP. The second step involves relating Pfam families which could not be associated reliably with a protein superfamily of known structure. The profile matching procedure, IMPALA, has been used in these steps. The first step resulted in identification of 1280 Pfam families (out of 2697, i.e. 47%) which are related, either by close homologous connection to a SCOP family or by distant relationship to a SCOP family, potentially forming new superfamily connections. Using the profiles of 1417 Pfam families with apparently no structural information, an all-against-all comparison involving a sequence-profile match using IMPALA resulted in clustering of 67 homologous protein families of Pfam into 28 potential new superfamilies. Expansion of groups of related proteins of yet unknown structural information, as proposed in SUPFAM, should help in identifying ‘priority proteins’ for structure determination in structural genomics initiatives to expand the coverage of structural information in the protein sequence space. For example, we could assign 858 distinct Pfam domains in 2203 of the gene products in the genome of Mycobacterium tubercolosis. Fifty-one of these Pfam families of unknown structure could be clustered into 17 potentially new superfamilies forming good targets for structural genomics. SUPFAM database can be accessed at http://pauling.mbu.iisc.ernet.in/~supfam.     

Integration of related sequences with protein three-dimensional structural families in an updated version of PALI database

The database of Phylogeny and ALIgnment of homologous protein structures (PALI) contains three-dimensional (3-D) structure-dependent sequence alignments as well as structure-based phylogenetic trees of protein domains in various families. The latest updated version (Release 2.1) comprises of 844 families of homologous proteins involving 3863 protein domain structures with each of these families having at least two members. Each member in a family has been structurally aligned with every other member in the same family using two proteins at a time. In addition, an alignment of multiple structures has also been performed using all the members in a family. Every family with at least three members is associated with two dendrograms, one based on a structural dissimilarity metric and the other based on similarity of topologically equivalenced residues for every pairwise alignment. Apart from these multi-member families, there are 817 single member families in the updated version of PALI. A new feature in the current release of PALI is the integration, with 3-D structural families, of sequences of homologues from the sequence databases. Alignments between homologous proteins of known 3-D structure and those without an experimentally derived structure are also provided for every family in the enhanced version of PALI. The database with several web interfaced utilities can be accessed at: http://pauling.mbu.iisc.ernet.in/~pali.     

Evolutionary information hidden in a single protein structure

The knowledge of conserved sequences in proteins is valuable in identifying functionally or structurally important residues. Generating the conservation profile of a sequence requires aligning families of homologous sequences and having knowledge of their evolutionary relationships. Here, we report that the conservation profile at the residue level can be quantitatively derived from a single protein structure with only backbone information. We found that the reciprocal packing density profiles of protein structures closely resemble their sequence conservation profiles. For a set of 554 nonhomologous enzymes, 74% (408/554) of the proteins have a correlation coefficient > 0.5 between these two profiles. Our results indicate that the three-dimensional structure, instead of being a mere scaffold for positioning amino acid residues, exerts such strong evolutionary constraints on the residues of the protein that its profile of sequence conservation essentially reflects that of its structural characteristics.     

The subunit interfaces of oligomeric enzymes are conserved to a similar extent to the overall protein sequences.

It is well established that, within families of homologous enzymes, amino acid residues that are involved in the chemistry of the reaction are highly conserved. To determine if residues at the subunit interface of oligomeric enzymes with shared active sites are also conserved, comparative analysis of five enzyme families was undertaken. For the chosen enzyme families, sequence data were available for a large number of proteins and a three-dimensional structure was known for at least two members of each family. The analysis indicates that the subunit interface and the hydrophobic core of proteins from all five families have diverged to a similar extent to the overall protein sequences.     

Identification of mammalian mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (MRPs) by N-terminal sequencing of purified bovine MRPs and comparison to data bank sequences: the large subribosomal particle

Bovine mitochondrial ribosomes are presented as a model system for mammalian mitochondrial ribosomes. An alternative system for identifying individual bovine mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (MRPs) by RP-HPLC is described. To identify and to characterize individual MRPs proteins were purified from bovine liver, separated by RP-HPLC, and identified by 2D PAGE techniques and immunoblotting. Molecular masses of individual MRPs were determined. Selected proteins were subjected to N-terminal amino acid sequencing. The peptide sequences obtained were used to screen different databases to identify several corresponding MRP sequences from human, mouse, rat, and yeast. Signal sequences for mitochondrial import were postulated by comparison of the bovine mature N-termini determined by amino acid sequencing with the deduced mammalian MRP sequences. Significant sequence similarities of these new MRPs to known r-proteins from other sources, e.g., E. coli, were detected only for two of the four MRP families presented. This finding suggests that mammalian mitochondrial ribosomes contain several novel proteins. Amino acid sequence information for all of the bovine MRPs will prove invaluable for assigning functions to their genes, which would otherwise remain unknown.     

Topological maps of protein sequences

A new method based on neural networks to cluster proteins into families is described. The network is trained with the Kohonen unsupervised learning algorithm, using matrix pattern representations of the protein sequences as inputs. The components (x, y) of these 20×20 matrix patterns are the normalized frequencies of all pairs xy of amino acids in each sequence. We investigate the influence of different learning parameters in the final topological maps obtained with a learning set of ten proteins belonging to three established families. In all cases, except in those where the synaptic vectors remains nearly unchanged during learning, the ten proteins are correctly classified into the expected families. The classification by the trained network of mutated or incomplete sequences of the learned proteins is also analysed. The neural network gives a correct classification for a sequence mutated in 21.5%±7% of its amino acids and for fragments representing 7.5%±3% of the original sequence. Similar results were obtained with a learning set of 32 proteins belonging to 15 families. These results show that a neural network can be trained following the Kohonen algorithm to obtain topological maps of protein sequences, where related proteins are finally associated to the same winner neuron or to neighboring ones, and that the trained network can be applied to rapidly classify new sequences. This approach opens new possibilities to find rapid and efficient algorithms to organize and search for homologies in the whole protein database.     

Sequence analysis reveals how G protein-coupled receptors transduce the signal to the G protein

Sequence entropy-variability plots based on alignments of very large numbers of sequences-can indicate the location in proteins of the main active site and modulator sites. In the previous article in this issue, we applied this observation to a series of well-studied proteins and concluded that it was possible to detect most of the residues with a known functional role. Here, we apply the method to rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors. Our conclusion is that G protein binding is the main evolutionary constraint on these receptors, and that other ligands, such as agonists, act as modulators. The activation of the receptors can be described as a simple, two-step process, and the residues involved in signal transduction can be identified.     

Locally defined protein phylogenetic profiles reveal previously missed protein interactions and functional relationships

Phylogenetic profiles encode patterns of presence or absence of genes across genomes, and these profiles can be used to assign functional relationships to nonhomologous pairs of proteins (Pellegrini et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:4284-4288). Although it is well known that many proteins were created from combinations of domains, most of the existing implementations of phylogenetic profiles do not consider this fact. Here, we introduce an extension that considers the multidomain nature of proteins and test the method against the known interaction data sets. Whereas earlier implementations associated one entire sequence with one protein phylogenetic profile (Single-Profile), our method instead breaks the sequence into a set of segments of predetermined size and constructs a separate profile for each segment (Multiple-Profile). The results show that the Multiple-Profile method performs as well as the Single-Profile method. However, the two methods share, surprisingly, a small fraction of their predictions, indicating that the Multiple-Profile method can detect known interactions missed by the Single-Profile method. Thus, the Multiple-Profile method can be used with other methods to determine functional relationships on a genome scale with wider coverage.