PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1 and PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1-RELATED1 Mediate Photorelocation Movements of Both Chloroplasts and Nuclei

Organelle movement and positioning play important roles in fundamental cellular activities and adaptive responses to environmental stress in plants. To optimize photosynthetic light utilization, chloroplasts move toward weak blue light (the accumulation response) and escape from strong blue light (the avoidance response). Nuclei also move in response to strong blue light by utilizing the light-induced movement of attached plastids in leaf cells. Blue light receptor phototropins and several factors for chloroplast photorelocation movement have been identified through molecular genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1 (PMI1) is a plant-specific C2-domain protein that is required for efficient chloroplast photorelocation movement. There are two PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1-RELATED (PMIR) genes, PMIR1 and PMIR2, in the Arabidopsis genome. However, the mechanism in which PMI1 regulates chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements and the involvement of PMIR1 and PMIR2 in these organelle movements remained unknown. Here, we analyzed chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements in mutant lines of PMI1, PMIR1, and PMIR2. In mesophyll cells, the pmi1 single mutant showed severe defects in both chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements resulting from the impaired regulation of chloroplast-actin filaments. In pavement cells, pmi1 mutant plants were partially defective in both plastid and nuclear photorelocation movements, but pmi1pmir1 and pmi1pmir1pmir2 mutant lines lacked the blue light-induced movement responses of plastids and nuclei completely. These results indicated that PMI1 is essential for chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements in mesophyll cells and that both PMI1 and PMIR1 are indispensable for photorelocation movements of plastids and thus, nuclei in pavement cells.In plants, organelles move within the cell and become appropriately positioned to accomplish their functions and adapt to the environment (for review, see Wada and Suetsugu, 2004). Light-induced chloroplast movement (chloroplast photorelocation movement) is one of the best characterized organelle movements in plants (Suetsugu and Wada, 2012). Under weak light conditions, chloroplasts move toward light to capture light efficiently (the accumulation response; Zurzycki, 1955). Under strong light conditions, chloroplasts escape from light to avoid photodamage (the avoidance response; Kasahara et al., 2002; Sztatelman et al., 2010; Davis and Hangarter, 2012; Cazzaniga et al., 2013). In most green plant species, these responses are induced primarily by the blue light receptor phototropin (phot) in response to a range of wavelengths from UVA to blue light (approximately 320–500 nm; for review, see Suetsugu and Wada, 2012; Wada and Suetsugu, 2013; Kong and Wada, 2014). Phot-mediated chloroplast movement has been shown in land plants, such as Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Jarillo et al., 2001; Kagawa et al., 2001; Sakai et al., 2001), the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris (Kagawa et al., 2004), the moss Physcomitrella patens (Kasahara et al., 2004), and the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha (Komatsu et al., 2014). Two phots in Arabidopsis, phot1 and phot2, redundantly mediate the accumulation response (Sakai et al., 2001), whereas phot2 primarily regulates the avoidance response (Jarillo et al., 2001; Kagawa et al., 2001; Luesse et al., 2010). M. polymorpha has only one phot that mediates both the accumulation and avoidance responses (Komatsu et al., 2014), although two or more phots mediate chloroplast photorelocation movement in A. capillus-veneris (Kagawa et al., 2004) and P. patens (Kasahara et al., 2004). Thus, duplication and functional diversification of PHOT genes have occurred during land plant evolution, and plants have gained a sophisticated light sensing system for chloroplast photorelocation movement.In general, movements of plant organelles, including chloroplasts, are dependent on actin filaments (for review, see Wada and Suetsugu, 2004). Most organelles common in eukaryotes, such as mitochondria, peroxisomes, and Golgi bodies, use the myosin motor for their movements, but there is no clear evidence that chloroplast movement is myosin dependent (for review, see Suetsugu et al., 2010a). Land plants have innovated a novel actin-based motility system that is specialized for chloroplast movement as well as a photoreceptor system (for review, see Suetsugu et al., 2010a; Wada and Suetsugu, 2013; Kong and Wada, 2014). Chloroplast-actin (cp-actin) filaments, which were first found in Arabidopsis, are short actin filaments specifically localized around the chloroplast periphery at the interface between the chloroplast and the plasma membrane (Kadota et al., 2009). Strong blue light induces the rapid disappearance of cp-actin filaments and then, their subsequent reappearance preferentially at the front region of the moving chloroplasts. This asymmetric distribution of cp-actin filaments is essential for directional chloroplast movement (Kadota et al., 2009; Kong et al., 2013a). The greater the difference in the amount of cp-actin filaments between the front and rear regions of chloroplasts becomes, the faster the chloroplasts move, in which the magnitude of the difference is determined by fluence rate (Kagawa and Wada, 2004; Kadota et al., 2009; Kong et al., 2013a). Strong blue light-induced disappearance of cp-actin filaments is regulated in a phot2-dependent manner before the intensive polymerization of cp-actin filaments at the front region occurs (Kadota et al., 2009; Ichikawa et al., 2011; Kong et al., 2013a). This phot2-dependent response contributes to the greater difference in the amount of cp-actin filaments between the front and rear regions of chloroplasts. Similar behavior of cp-actin filaments has also been observed in A. capillus-veneris (Tsuboi and Wada, 2012) and P. patens (Yamashita et al., 2011).Like chloroplasts, nuclei also show light-mediated movement and positioning (nuclear photorelocation movement) in land plants (for review, see Higa et al., 2014b). In gametophytic cells of A. capillus-veneris, weak light induced the accumulation responses of both chloroplasts and nuclei, whereas strong light induced avoidance responses (Kagawa and Wada, 1993, 1995; Tsuboi et al., 2007). However, in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis, strong blue light induced both chloroplast and nuclear avoidance responses, but weak blue light induced only the chloroplast accumulation response (Iwabuchi et al., 2007, 2010; Higa et al., 2014a). In Arabidopsis pavement cells, small numbers of tiny plastids were found and showed autofluorescence under the confocal laser-scanning microscopy (Iwabuchi et al., 2010; Higa et al., 2014a). Hereafter, the plastid in the pavement cells is called the pavement cell plastid. Strong blue light-induced avoidance responses of pavement cell plastids and nuclei were induced in a phot2-dependent manner, but the accumulation response was not detected for either organelle (Iwabuchi et al., 2007, 2010; Higa et al., 2014a). In both Arabidopsis and A. capillus-veneris, phots mediate nuclear photorelocation movement, and phot2 mediates the nuclear avoidance response (Iwabuchi et al., 2007, 2010; Tsuboi et al., 2007). The nuclear avoidance response is dependent on actin filaments in both mesophyll and pavement cells of Arabidopsis (Iwabuchi et al., 2010). Recently, it was shown that the nuclear avoidance response relies on cp-actin-dependent movement of pavement cell plastids, where nuclei are associated with pavement cell plastids of Arabidopsis (Higa et al., 2014a). In mesophyll cells, nuclear avoidance response is likely dependent on cp-actin filament-mediated chloroplast movement, because the mutants deficient in chloroplast movement were also defective in nuclear avoidance response (Higa et al., 2014a). Thus, phots mediate both chloroplast (and pavement cell plastid) and nuclear photorelocation movement by regulating cp-actin filaments.Molecular genetic analyses of Arabidopsis mutants deficient in chloroplast photorelocation movement have identified many molecular factors involved in signal transduction and/or motility systems as well as those involved in the photoreceptor system for chloroplast photorelocation movement (and thus, nuclear photorelocation movement; for review, see Suetsugu and Wada, 2012; Wada and Suetsugu, 2013; Kong and Wada, 2014). CHLOROPLAST UNUSUAL POSITIONING1 (CHUP1; Oikawa et al., 2003) and KINESIN-LIKE PROTEIN FOR ACTIN-BASED CHLOROPLAST MOVEMENT (KAC; Suetsugu et al., 2010b) are key factors for generating and/or maintaining cp-actin filaments. Both proteins are highly conserved in land plants and essential for the movement and attachment of chloroplasts to the plasma membrane in Arabidopsis (Oikawa et al., 2003, 2008; Suetsugu et al., 2010b), A. capillus-veneris (Suetsugu et al., 2012), and P. patens (Suetsugu et al., 2012; Usami et al., 2012). CHUP1 is localized on the chloroplast outer membrane and binds to globular and filamentous actins and profilin in vitro (Oikawa et al., 2003, 2008; Schmidt von Braun and Schleiff, 2008). Although KAC is a kinesin-like protein, it lacks microtubule-dependent motor activity but has filamentous actin binding activity (Suetsugu et al., 2010b). An actin-bundling protein THRUMIN1 (THRUM1) is required for efficient chloroplast photorelocation movement (Whippo et al., 2011) and interacts with cp-actin filaments (Kong et al., 2013a). chup1 and kac mutant plants were shown to lack detectable cp-actin filaments (Kadota et al., 2009; Suetsugu et al., 2010b; Ichikawa et al., 2011; Kong et al., 2013a). Similarly, cp-actin filaments were rarely detected in thrum1 mutant plants (Kong et al., 2013a), indicating that THRUM1 also plays an important role in maintaining cp-actin filaments.Other proteins J-DOMAIN PROTEIN REQUIRED FOR CHLOROPLAST ACCUMULATION RESPONSE1 (JAC1; Suetsugu et al., 2005), WEAK CHLOROPLAST MOVEMENT UNDER BLUE LIGHT1 (WEB1; Kodama et al., 2010), and PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED2 (PMI2; Luesse et al., 2006; Kodama et al., 2010) are involved in the light regulation of cp-actin filaments and chloroplast photorelocation movement. JAC1 is an auxilin-like J-domain protein that mediates the chloroplast accumulation response through its J-domain function (Suetsugu et al., 2005; Takano et al., 2010). WEB1 and PMI2 are coiled-coil proteins that interact with each other (Kodama et al., 2010). Although web1 and pmi2 were partially defective in the avoidance response, the jac1 mutation completely suppressed the phenotype of web1 and pmi2, suggesting that the WEB1/PMI2 complex suppresses JAC1 function (i.e. the accumulation response) under strong light conditions (Kodama et al., 2010). Both web1 and pmi2 showed impaired disappearance of cp-actin filaments in response to strong blue light (Kodama et al., 2010). However, the exact molecular functions of these proteins are unknown.In this study, we characterized mutant plants deficient in the PMI1 gene and two homologous genes PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1-RELATED1 (PMIR1) and PMIR2. PMI1 was identified through molecular genetic analyses of pmi1 mutants that showed severe defects in chloroplast accumulation and avoidance responses (DeBlasio et al., 2005). PMI1 is a plant-specific C2-domain protein (DeBlasio et al., 2005; Zhang and Aravind, 2010), but its roles and those of PMIRs in cp-actin-mediated chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements remained unclear. Thus, we analyzed chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements in the single, double, and triple mutants of pmi1, pmir1, and pmir2.     

Chloroplast DNA Replication Is Regulated by the Redox State Independently of Chloroplast Division in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

Chloroplasts arose from a cyanobacterial endosymbiont and multiply by division. In algal cells, chloroplast division is regulated by the cell cycle so as to occur only once, in the S phase. Chloroplasts possess multiple copies of their own genome that must be replicated during chloroplast proliferation. In order to examine how chloroplast DNA replication is regulated in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, we first asked whether it is regulated by the cell cycle, as is the case for chloroplast division. Chloroplast DNA is replicated in the light and not the dark phase, independent of the cell cycle or the timing of chloroplast division in photoautotrophic culture. Inhibition of photosynthetic electron transfer blocked chloroplast DNA replication. However, chloroplast DNA was replicated when the cells were grown heterotrophically in the dark, raising the possibility that chloroplast DNA replication is coupled with the reducing power supplied by photosynthesis or the uptake of acetate. When dimethylthiourea, a reactive oxygen species scavenger, was added to the photoautotrophic culture, chloroplast DNA was replicated even in the dark. In contrast, when methylviologen, a reactive oxygen species inducer, was added, chloroplast DNA was not replicated in the light. Moreover, the chloroplast DNA replication activity in both the isolated chloroplasts and nucleoids was increased by dithiothreitol, while it was repressed by diamide, a specific thiol-oxidizing reagent. These results suggest that chloroplast DNA replication is regulated by the redox state that is sensed by the nucleoids and that the disulfide bonds in nucleoid-associated proteins are involved in this regulatory activity.Chloroplasts are semiautonomous organelles that possess their own genome, which is complexed with proteins to form nucleoids and also certain machinery needed for protein synthesis, as is the case in prokaryotes. It is generally accepted that chloroplasts arose from a bacterial endosymbiont closely related to the currently extant cyanobacteria (Archibald, 2009; Keeling, 2010). In a manner reminiscent of their free-living ancestor, chloroplasts proliferate by the division of preexisting organelles that are coupled to the duplication and segregation of the nucleoids (Kuroiwa, 1991) and have retained the bulk of their bacterial biochemistry. However, chloroplasts have subsequently been substantially remodeled by the host cell so as to function as complementary organelles within the eukaryotic host cell (Rodríguez-Ezpeleta and Philippe, 2006; Archibald, 2009; Keeling, 2010). For example, most of the genes that were once in the original endosymbiont genome have been either lost or transferred into the host nuclear genome. As a result, the size of the chloroplast genome has been reduced to less than one-tenth that of the free-living cyanobacterial genome. Thus, the bulk of the chloroplast proteome consists of nucleus-encoded proteins that are translated on cytoplasmic ribosomes and translocated into chloroplasts. In addition, chloroplast division ultimately came to be a process tightly regulated by the host cell, which ensured permanent inheritance of the chloroplasts during the course of cell division and from generation to generation (Rodríguez-Ezpeleta and Philippe, 2006; Archibald, 2009; Keeling, 2010).Chloroplast division is performed by constriction of the ring structures at the division site, encompassing both the inside and the outside of the two envelopes (Yang et al., 2008; Maple and Møller, 2010; Miyagishima, 2011; Pyke, 2013). One part of the division machinery is derived from the cyanobacterial cytokinetic machinery that is based on the FtsZ protein. In contrast, other parts of the division machinery involve proteins specific to eukaryotes, including one member of the dynamin family. The majority of algae (both unicellular and multicellular), which diverged early within the Plantae, have just one or at most only a few chloroplasts per cell. In algae, the chloroplast divides once per cell cycle before the host cell completes cytokinesis (Suzuki et al., 1994; Miyagishima et al., 2012). In contrast, land plants and certain algal species contain dozens of chloroplasts per cell that divide nonsynchronously, even within the same cell (Boffey and Lloyd, 1988). Because land plants evolved from algae, there is likely to have been a linkage between the cell cycle and chloroplast division in their algal ancestor that was subsequently lost during land plant evolution. Our recent study showed that the timing of chloroplast division in algae is restricted to the S phase by S phase-specific formation of the chloroplast division machinery, which is based on the cell cycle-regulated expression of the components of the chloroplast division machinery (Miyagishima et al., 2012).Because chloroplasts possess their own genome, chloroplast DNA must be duplicated so that each daughter chloroplast inherits the required DNA after division. However, it is still unclear how the replication of chloroplast DNA is regulated and whether the replication is coupled with the timing of chloroplast division, even though certain studies have addressed this issue, as described below.Bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis possess a single circular chromosome. In these bacteria, the process of DNA replication is tightly coupled with cell division (Boye et al., 2000; Zakrzewska-Czerwińska et al., 2007), in which the initiation of replication is regulated such that it occurs only once per cell division cycle (Boye et al., 2000). In contrast, cyanobacteria contain multiple copies of their DNA (e.g. three to five copies in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942; Mann and Carr, 1974; Griese et al., 2011). In some obligate photoautotrophic cyanobacterial species, replication is initiated only when light is available (Binder and Chisholm, 1990; Mori et al., 1996; Watanabe et al., 2012). Replication is initiated asynchronously among the multiple copies of the DNA. Although the regulation of the initiation of DNA replication is less stringent than that in E. coli and B. subtilis, as described above, a recent study using S. elongatus PCC 7942 showed that this replication peaks prior to cell division, as in other bacteria.Chloroplasts also contain multiple copies of DNA (approximately 1,000 copies; Boffey and Leech, 1982; Miyamura et al., 1986; Baumgartner et al., 1989; Oldenburg and Bendich, 2004; Oldenburg et al., 2006; Shaver et al., 2008). In algae, chloroplast DNA is replicated in a manner that keeps pace with chloroplast and cell division in order to maintain the proper DNA content per chloroplast (i.e. per cell). In contrast, in land plants, the copy number of DNA in each chloroplast (plastid) changes during the course of development and differentiation, although contradictory results were reported about leaf development (Lamppa and Bendich, 1979; Boffey and Leech, 1982; Hashimoto and Possingham, 1989; Kuroiwa, 1991; Rowan and Bendich, 2009; Matsushima et al., 2011). Previous studies that synchronized the algal cell cycle by means of a 24-h light/dark cycle showed that chloroplast DNA is replicated only during the G1 phase, after which it is separated into daughter chloroplasts during the S phase by chloroplast division, implying that chloroplast DNA replication and division are temporally separated (Chiang and Sueoka, 1967; Grant et al., 1978; Suzuki et al., 1994). However, under these experimental conditions, G1 cells grow and the chloroplast DNA level increases during the light period. Cells enter into the S phase, chloroplast DNA replication ceases, and the chloroplasts divide at the beginning of the dark period. Thus, it is still unclear whether chloroplast DNA replication is directly controlled by the cell cycle, as is the case in chloroplast division, or chloroplast DNA replication occurs merely when light energy is available.We addressed this issue using a synchronous culture as well as a heterotrophic culture of the mixotrophic green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The results show that chloroplast DNA replication occurs independently of either the cell cycle or the timing of chloroplast division. Instead, it is shown that chloroplast DNA replication occurs when light is available in photoautotrophic culture and even under darkness in heterotrophic culture. Further experimental results suggest that chloroplast DNA replication is regulated by the redox state in the cell, which is sensed by the chloroplast nucleoids.     

Phototropin Encoded by a Single-Copy Gene Mediates Chloroplast Photorelocation Movements in the Liverwort Marchantia polymorpha

Blue-light-induced chloroplast photorelocation movement is observed in most land plants. Chloroplasts move toward weak-light-irradiated areas to efficiently absorb light (the accumulation response) and escape from strong-light-irradiated areas to avoid photodamage (the avoidance response). The plant-specific kinase phototropin (phot) is the blue-light receptor for chloroplast movements. Although the molecular mechanisms for chloroplast photorelocation movement have been analyzed, the overall aspects of signal transduction common to land plants are still unknown. Here, we show that the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha exhibits the accumulation and avoidance responses exclusively induced by blue light as well as specific chloroplast positioning in the dark. Moreover, in silico and Southern-blot analyses revealed that the M. polymorpha genome encodes a single PHOT gene, MpPHOT, and its knockout line displayed none of the chloroplast photorelocation movements, indicating that the sole MpPHOT gene mediates all types of movement. Mpphot was localized on the plasma membrane and exhibited blue-light-dependent autophosphorylation both in vitro and in vivo. Heterologous expression of MpPHOT rescued the defects in chloroplast movement of phot mutants in the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris and the seed plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). These results indicate that Mpphot possesses evolutionarily conserved regulatory activities for chloroplast photorelocation movement. M. polymorpha offers a simple and versatile platform for analyzing the fundamental processes of phototropin-mediated chloroplast photorelocation movement common to land plants.Light is not only an energy source for photosynthesis but it is also a signal that regulates numerous physiological responses for plants. Because chloroplasts are the important organelle for photosynthesis, most plant species possess a light-dependent mechanism to regulate the intracellular position of chloroplasts (chloroplast photorelocation movement). Intensive studies on chloroplast photorelocation movement have been performed since the 19th century (Böhm, 1856). Senn (1908) described the chloroplast distribution patterns under different light conditions in various plant species, including algae, liverworts, mosses, ferns, and seed plants, and revealed the general responses of chloroplasts to intensity and direction of light. Under low-light conditions, chloroplasts are positioned along the cell walls perpendicular to the direction of incident light (i.e. periclinal cell walls) to efficiently capture light for photosynthesis (the accumulation response). By contrast, under high-light conditions, chloroplasts are stacked along the cell walls parallel to the direction of incident light (i.e. anticlinal cell walls) to minimize total light absorption and to avoid photooxidative damage (the avoidance response). These chloroplast movements are induced primarily by blue light in most plant species (Suetsugu and Wada, 2007a). In some plant species, such as several ferns including Adiantum capillus-veneris, the moss Physcomitrella patens, and some charophycean green algae (Mougeotia scalaris and Mesotaenium caldariorum), red light is also effective to induce chloroplast movement (Suetsugu and Wada, 2007b). Analyses of chloroplast movement in response to irradiation with polarized light and/or a microbeam suggest that the photoreceptor for chloroplast movement is localized on or close to the plasma membrane (Haupt and Scheuerlein, 1990; Wada et al., 1993). In addition, chloroplasts assume their specific positions in the dark (dark positioning), although the patterns vary among plant species (Senn, 1908). For example, the chloroplasts are localized at the bottom of the cell in palisade cells of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Suetsugu et al., 2005a) and on the anticlinal walls bordering neighboring cells in the prothallial cells of A. capillus-veneris (Kagawa and Wada, 1993; Tsuboi et al., 2007).Molecular mechanisms for chloroplast photorelocation movements have been revealed through molecular genetic analyses using Arabidopsis (Suetsugu and Wada, 2012). The light-activated kinase phototropin was identified as the blue-light receptor (Jarillo et al., 2001; Kagawa et al., 2001; Sakai et al., 2001). Phototropin consists of two functional regions: a photosensory domain at the N terminus and a Ser/Thr kinase domain at the C terminus (Christie, 2007). The N-terminal photosensory domain contains two light, oxygen, or voltage (LOV) domains, which belong to the Per/ARNT/Sim domain superfamily. Each LOV domain binds to one FMN and functions as a blue-light sensor (Christie et al., 1999). The LOV2 domain is essential for blue-light-dependent regulation of the activation of the C-terminal kinase domain (Christie et al., 2002; Harper et al., 2003).Arabidopsis has two phototropins: phot1 and phot2 (Christie, 2007). Besides chloroplast photorelocation movement, phototropin controls other photoresponses to optimize the photosynthetic efficiency in plants and improves growth responses such as phototropism, stomatal opening, and leaf flattening (Christie, 2007). Both phot1 and phot2 redundantly regulate the chloroplast accumulation response (Sakai et al., 2001), hypocotyl phototropism (Huala et al., 1997; Sakai et al., 2001), stomatal opening (Kinoshita et al., 2001), and leaf flattening (Sakai et al., 2001; Sakamoto and Briggs, 2002). Rapid inhibition of hypocotyl elongation is specifically mediated by phot1 (Folta and Spalding, 2001), whereas the chloroplast avoidance response (Jarillo et al., 2001; Kagawa et al., 2001) and palisade cell development (Kozuka et al., 2011) are mediated primarily by phot2.It is thought that the phototropin-regulated photoresponses are mediated by mechanisms in which gene expression is not involved primarily. For example, chloroplast photorelocation movement can be observed even in enucleated fern cells (Wada, 1988), and phototropins show only a minor contribution to blue-light-induced gene expression in Arabidopsis (Jiao et al., 2003; Ohgishi et al., 2004; Lehmann et al., 2011). Furthermore, both phot1 and phot2 are localized on the plasma membrane despite the absence of a transmembrane domain (Sakamoto and Briggs, 2002; Kong et al., 2006). During chloroplast movement, phototropins, in particular phot2, associate not only with the plasma membrane but also with the chloroplast outer membrane (Kong et al., 2013b). In addition, phot1 shows blue-light-dependent internalization into the cytoplasm (Sakamoto and Briggs, 2002; Knieb et al., 2004; Wan et al., 2008; Kaiserli et al., 2009), whereas phot2 exhibits a blue-light-dependent association with the Golgi apparatus (Kong et al., 2006).PHOT genes have been identified from various green plants and are indicated to be duplicated in respective lineages such as seed plants, ferns, lycophytes, and mosses (Li et al., 2014). In the fern A. capillus-veneris, chloroplast accumulation and avoidance responses are induced by both blue and red light (Yatsuhashi et al., 1985). This fern has three phototropin family proteins, two phototropins (Acphot1 and Acphot2; Kagawa et al., 2004), and one neochrome that possesses the chromophore-binding domain of phytochrome and complete phototropin domains (Nozue et al., 1998). Neochrome is the red-light receptor that mediates chloroplast movement (Kawai et al., 2003) and possibly blue-light-induced chloroplast movement through its LOV domains (Kanegae et al., 2006). Because the Acphot2 mutant is defective in the chloroplast avoidance response and dark positioning (Kagawa et al., 2004; Tsuboi et al., 2007), similar to the phot2 mutant in Arabidopsis (Jarillo et al., 2001; Kagawa et al., 2001; Suetsugu et al., 2005a), the function of phot2 in the regulation of chloroplast movement is highly conserved in these vascular plants. In the moss P. patens, in which chloroplast accumulation and avoidance responses are induced by both blue and red light (Kadota et al., 2000), seven phototropin genes are present in the draft genome sequences (Rensing et al., 2008). The phototropins encoded by four of these genes (PpphotA1, PpphotA2, PpphotB1, and PpphotB2) function in the blue-light-induced chloroplast movement (Kasahara et al., 2004). Moreover, red-light-induced chloroplast movements are mediated by both conventional phytochromes (Mittmann et al., 2004; Uenaka and Kadota, 2007) and phototropins (Kasahara et al., 2004). Because the direct association between phytochromes and phototropins is suggested to be involved in red-light-induced chloroplast movement (Jaedicke et al., 2012), phototropins should be essential components in the chloroplast movement signaling pathway (Kasahara et al., 2004).A single PHOT gene was isolated in a unicellular green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Huang et al., 2002; Kasahara et al., 2002). When expressed in Arabidopsis phot1 phot2 double-mutant plants, C. reinhardtii phototropin rescued the defects in chloroplast photorelocation movement in phot1 phot2 plants (Onodera et al., 2005), indicating that the initial step of the phototropin-mediated signal transduction mechanism for chloroplast movements is conserved in the green plant lineage. Although the existence of only one PHOT gene is ideal for elucidation of phototropin-mediated responses, C. reinhardtii cells contain a single chloroplast and show no chloroplast photorelocation movement.Liverworts represent the most basal lineage of extant land plants and offer a valuable experimental system for elucidation of various physiological responses commonly seen in land plants (Bowman et al., 2007). Marchantia polymorpha has emerged as a model liverwort because molecular biological techniques, such as genetic transformation and gene-targeting technologies, have been established for the species (Ishizaki et al., 2008, 2013a; Kubota et al., 2013; Sugano et al., 2014). Furthermore, an ongoing M. polymorpha genome sequencing project under the Community Sequencing Program at the Joint Genome Institute has indicated that many biological mechanisms found in other groups of land plants are conserved in a much less complex form. Blue-light-induced chloroplast movement was briefly reported in M. polymorpha (Senn, 1908; Nakazato et al., 1999). However, information on chloroplast photorelocation movement in liverworts, including M. polymorpha, is very limited.In this study, we investigated chloroplast photorelocation movement in detail in M. polymorpha and analyzed the molecular mechanism underlying the photoreceptor system through molecular genetic analysis of M. polymorpha phototropin.     

Autophagy Plays a Role in Chloroplast Degradation during Senescence in Individually Darkened Leaves

Chloroplasts contain approximately 80% of total leaf nitrogen and represent a major source of recycled nitrogen during leaf senescence. While bulk degradation of the cytosol and organelles in plants is mediated by autophagy, its role in chloroplast catabolism is largely unknown. We investigated the effects of autophagy disruption on the number and size of chloroplasts during senescence. When leaves were individually darkened, senescence was promoted similarly in both wild-type Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and in an autophagy-defective mutant, atg4a4b-1. The number and size of chloroplasts decreased in darkened leaves of wild type, while the number remained constant and the size decrease was suppressed in atg4a4b-1. When leaves of transgenic plants expressing stroma-targeted DsRed were individually darkened, a large accumulation of fluorescence in the vacuolar lumen was observed. Chloroplasts exhibiting chlorophyll fluorescence, as well as Rubisco-containing bodies, were also observed in the vacuole. No accumulation of stroma-targeted DsRed, chloroplasts, or Rubisco-containing bodies was observed in the vacuoles of the autophagy-defective mutant. We have succeeded in demonstrating chloroplast autophagy in living cells and provide direct evidence of chloroplast transportation into the vacuole.Chloroplasts contain 75% to 80% of total leaf nitrogen mainly as proteins (Makino and Osmond, 1991). During leaf senescence, chloroplast proteins are gradually degraded as a major source of nitrogen for new growth (Wittenbach, 1978; Friedrich and Huffaker, 1980; Mae et al., 1984), correlating with a decline in photosynthetic activity, while chloroplasts gradually shrink and transform into gerontoplasts, characterized by the disintegration of the thylakoid membranes and accumulation of plastoglobuli (for a recent review, see Krupinska, 2006). Concomitantly, a decline in the cellular population of chloroplasts is also evident in many cases, for example, during natural (Kura-Hotta et al., 1990; Inada et al., 1998), dark-induced (Wittenbach et al., 1982), and nutrient-limited senescence (Mae et al., 1984; Ono et al., 1995), suggesting the existence of a whole chloroplast degradation system. Some electron microscopic studies have shown whole chloroplasts in the central vacuole, which is rich in lytic hydrolases (Wittenbach et al., 1982; Minamikawa et al., 2001). However, there is no direct evidence of chloroplasts moving into the vacuole in living cells and the mechanism of transport is not yet understood (Hörtensteiner and Feller, 2002; Krupinska, 2006).The most abundant chloroplast protein is Rubisco (EC 4.1.1.39), comprising approximately 50% of the soluble protein (Wittenbach, 1978). The amount of Rubisco decreases rapidly in the early phase of leaf senescence, although more slowly in the later phase (Friedrich and Huffaker, 1980; Mae et al., 1984). In contrast, the chloroplast number remains relatively constant, making it impossible to explain Rubisco loss solely by whole chloroplast degradation. However, the mechanism of intrachloroplastic Rubisco degradation is still unknown (for review, see Feller et al., 2008). Using immunoelectron microscopy, we previously demonstrated in naturally senescing wheat (Triticum aestivum) leaves that Rubisco is released from chloroplasts into the cytoplasm and transported to the vacuole for subsequent degradation in small spherical bodies, named Rubisco-containing bodies (RCBs; Chiba et al., 2003). Similar chloroplast-derived structures were also subsequently confirmed in senescent leaves of soybean (Glycine max) and/or Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) by electron microscopy (Otegui et al., 2005), and recently in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves by immunoelectron microscopy, although the authors gave them a different name, Rubisco vesicular bodies (Prins et al., 2008). RCBs have double membranes, which seem to be derived from the chloroplast envelope; thus, the RCB-mediated degradation of stromal proteins represents a potential mechanism for chloroplast shrinkage during senescence. We recently demonstrated that Rubisco and stroma-targeted fluorescent proteins can be mobilized to the vacuole by ATG-dependent autophagy via RCBs, using leaves treated with concanamycin A, a vacuolar H⁺-ATPase inhibitor (Ishida et al., 2008). To investigate further, we wished to observe chloroplast autophagy and degradation directly in living cells to determine whether autophagy is responsible for chloroplast shrinkage and whether it is involved in the vacuolar degradation of whole chloroplasts during leaf senescence.Autophagy is known to be a major system for the bulk degradation of intracellular proteins and organelles in the vacuole in yeast and plants, or the lysosome in animals (for detailed mechanisms, see reviews by Ohsumi, 2001; Levine and Klionsky, 2004; Thompson and Vierstra, 2005; Bassham et al., 2006). In those systems, a portion of the cytoplasm, including entire organelles, is engulfed in membrane-bound vesicles and delivered to the vacuole/lysosome. A recent genome-wide search confirmed that Arabidopsis has many genes homologous to the yeast autophagy genes (ATGs; Doelling et al., 2002; Hanaoka et al., 2002; for detailed functions of ATGs, see the reviews noted above). Using knockout mutants of ATGs and a monitoring system with an autophagy marker, GFP-ATG8, numerous studies have demonstrated the presence of the autophagy system in plants and its importance in several biological processes (Yoshimoto et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2005; Suzuki et al., 2005; Thompson et al., 2005; Xiong et al., 2005, 2007; Fujiki et al., 2007; Phillips et al., 2008). These articles suggest that autophagy plays an important role in nutrient recycling during senescence, especially in nutrient-starved plants. The atg mutants exhibited an accelerated loss of some chloroplast proteins, but not all, under nutrient-starved conditions and during senescence, suggesting that autophagy is not the sole mechanism for the degradation of chloroplast proteins; other, as yet unidentified systems must be responsible for the degradation of chloroplast contents when the ATG system is compromised (Levine and Klionsky, 2004; Bassham et al., 2006). However, it still remains likely that autophagy is responsible for the vacuolar degradation of chloroplasts in wild-type plants.Prolonged observation is generally required to follow leaf senescence events in naturally aging leaves and senescence-associated processes tend to become chaotic over time. To observe chloroplast degradation over a short period, and to draw clear conclusions, a suitable experimental model of leaf senescence is required. Weaver and Amasino (2001) reported that senescence is rapidly induced in individually darkened leaves (IDLs) of Arabidopsis, but retarded in plants subjected to full darkness. In addition, Keech et al. (2007) observed a significant decrease of both the number and size of chloroplasts in IDLs within 6 d.In this study, using IDLs as a senescence model, we aimed to investigate the involvement of autophagy in chloroplast degradation. We show direct evidence for the transport of whole chloroplasts and RCBs to the vacuole by autophagy.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

The Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 axis affects spindle assembly checkpoint robustness and sensitivity to antimicrotubule cancer drugs

To grant faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit until mitotic spindle assembly. An exceedingly prolonged mitosis, however, promotes cell death and by this means antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs), that impair spindle assembly, are believed to kill cancer cells. Despite malformed spindles, cancer cells can, however, slip through SAC, exit mitosis prematurely and resist killing. We show here that the Fcp1 phosphatase and Wee1, the cyclin B-dependent kinase (cdk) 1 inhibitory kinase, play a role for this slippage/resistance mechanism. During AMCD-induced prolonged mitosis, Fcp1-dependent Wee1 reactivation lowered cdk1 activity, weakening SAC-dependent mitotic arrest and leading to mitosis exit and survival. Conversely, genetic or chemical Wee1 inhibition strengthened the SAC, further extended mitosis, reduced antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 to a minimum and potentiated killing in several, AMCD-treated cancer cell lines and primary human adult lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Thus, the Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 (FWC) axis affects SAC robustness and AMCDs sensitivity.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit to coordinate anaphase onset with spindle assembly. To this end, SAC inhibits the ubiquitin ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) to prevent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor securin and cyclin B, the major mitotic cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1) activator, until spindle assembly.¹ However, by yet poorly understood mechanisms, exceedingly prolonging mitosis translates into cell death induction.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Although mechanistic details are still missing on how activation of cell death pathways is linked to mitosis duration, prolongation of mitosis appears crucial for the ability of antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs) to kill cancer cells.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} These drugs, targeting microtubules, impede mitotic spindle assembly and delay mitosis exit by chronically activating the SAC. Use of these drugs is limited, however, by toxicity and resistance. A major mechanism for resistance is believed to reside in the ability of cancer cells to slip through the SAC and exit mitosis prematurely despite malformed spindles, thus resisting killing by limiting mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Under the AMCD treatment, cells either die in mitosis or exit mitosis, slipping through the SAC, without or abnormally dividing.^{2, 3, 4} Cells that exit mitosis either die at later stages or survive and stop dividing or proliferate, giving rise to resistance.^{2, 3, 4} Apart from a role for p53, what dictates cell fate is still unknown; however, it appears that the longer mitosis is protracted, the higher the chances for cell death pathway activation are.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}Although SAC is not required per se for killing,⁶ preventing SAC adaptation should improve the efficacy of AMCD by increasing mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Therefore, further understanding of the mechanisms by which cells override SAC may help to improve the current AMCD therapy. Several kinases are known to activate and sustain SAC, and cdk1 itself appears to be of primary relevance.^{1, 8, 9} By studying mitosis exit and SAC resolution, we recently reported a role for the Fcp1 phosphatase to bring about cdk1 inactivation.^{10, 11} Among Fcp1 targets, we identified cyclin degradation pathway components, such as Cdc20, an APC/C co-activator, USP44, a deubiquitinating enzyme, and Wee1.^{10, 11} Wee1 is a crucial kinase that controls the G2 phase by performing inhibitory phosphorylation of cdk1 at tyr-15 (Y15-cdk1). Wee1 is also in a feedback relationship with cdk1 itself that, in turn, can phosphorylate and inhibit Wee1 in an autoamplification loop to promote the G2-to-M phase transition.¹² At mitosis exit, Fcp1 dephosphorylated Wee1 at threonine 239, a cdk1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation, to dampen down the cdk1 autoamplification loop, and Cdc20 and USP44, to promote APC/C-dependent cyclin B degradation.^{10, 11, 12} In this study we analysed the Fcp1 relevance in SAC adaptation and AMCD sensitivity.     

Comparison of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Cardiovascular Disease in Humans and Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

In the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging, the aging process is the result of cumulative damage by reactive oxygen species. Humans and chimpanzees are remarkably similar; but humans live twice as long as chimpanzees and therefore are believed to age at a slower rate. The purpose of this study was to compare biomarkers for cardiovascular disease, oxidative stress, and aging between male chimpanzees and humans. Compared with men, male chimpanzees were at increased risk for cardiovascular disease because of their significantly higher levels of fibrinogen, IGF1, insulin, lipoprotein a, and large high-density lipoproteins. Chimpanzees showed increased oxidative stress, measured as significantly higher levels of 5-hydroxymethyl-2-deoxyuridine and 8-iso-prostaglandin F_2α, a higher peroxidizability index, and higher levels of the prooxidants ceruloplasmin and copper. In addition, chimpanzees had decreased levels of antioxidants, including α- and β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene, and tocopherols, as well as decreased levels of the cardiovascular protection factors albumin and bilirubin. As predicted by the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging, male chimpanzees exhibit higher levels of oxidative stress and a much higher risk for cardiovascular disease, particularly cardiomyopathy, compared with men of equivalent age. Given these results, we hypothesize that the longer lifespan of humans is at least in part the result of greater antioxidant capacity and lower risk of cardiovascular disease associated with lower oxidative stress.Abbreviations: 5OHmU, 5-hydroxymethyl-2-deoxyuridine; 8isoPGF_2α, 8-iso-prostaglandin F_2α; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; ROS, reactive oxygen speciesAging is characterized as a progressive reduction in the capacity to withstand the stresses of everyday life and a corresponding increase in risk of mortality. According to the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging, much of the aging process can be accounted for as the result of cumulative damage produced by reactive oxygen species (ROS).^{6,21,28,41,97} Endogenous oxygen radicals (that is, ROS) are generated as a byproduct of normal metabolic reactions in the body and subsequently can cause extensive damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA.^6,41 Various prooxidant elements, in particular free transition metals, can catalyze these destructive reactions.⁶ The damage caused by ROS can be counteracted by antioxidant defense systems, but the imbalance between production of ROS and antioxidant defenses, over time, leads to oxidative stress and may contribute to the rate of aging.^28,97Oxidative stress has been linked to several age-related diseases including neurodegenerative diseases, ophthalmologic diseases, cancer, and cardiovascular disease.^21,28,97 Of these, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of adult death in the United States and Europe.⁷¹ In terms of cardiovascular disease, oxidative stress has been linked to atherosclerosis, hypertension, cardiomyopathy, and chronic heart failure in humans.^55,78,84 Increases in oxidant catalysts (prooxidants)—such as copper, iron, and cadmium—have been associated with hypertension, coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis, and sudden cardiac death.^98,102,106 Finally, both endogenous and exogenous antioxidants have been linked to decreased risk of cardiovascular disease, although the mechanisms behind this relationship are unclear.^11,52,53 However, the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging aims to explain not only the mechanism of aging and age-related diseases (such as cardiovascular disease) in humans but also the differences between aging rates and the manifestations of age-related diseases across species.The differences in antioxidant and ROS levels between animals and humans offer promise for increasing our understanding of human aging. Additional evidence supporting the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging has come from comparative studies linking differences in aging rates across taxa with both antioxidant and ROS levels.^{4,17-21,58,71,86,105} In mammals, maximum lifespan potential is positively correlated with both serum and tissue antioxidant levels.^{17,18,21,71,105} Research has consistently demonstrated that the rate of oxidative damage varies across species and is negatively correlated with maximum lifespan potential.^{4,19,20,58,71,86} However, few studies involved detailed comparisons of hypothesized biochemical indicators of aging and oxidative stress between humans and animals.⁶ This type of interspecies comparison has great potential for directly testing the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging.Much evolutionary and genetic evidence supports remarkable similarity between humans and chimpanzees.^95,100 Despite this similarity, humans have a lifespan of almost twice that of chimpanzees.^3,16,47 Most comparative primate aging research has focused on the use of a macaque model,^62,81,88 and several biochemical markers of age-related diseases have been identified in both humans and macaque monkeys.^{9,22,28,81,93,97} Several other species of monkeys have also been used in research addressing oxidative stress, antioxidant defenses, and maximum lifespan potential.^18,21,58,105 However, no study to date has examined biochemical indicators of oxidative stress and aging in chimpanzees and humans as a test of the oxidative stress hypothesis for aging. The purpose of this study is to compare biochemical markers for cardiovascular disease, oxidative stress, and aging directly between male chimpanzees and humans. Given the oxidative stress hypothesis for aging and the known role of oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease, we predict that chimpanzees will show higher levels of cardiovascular risk and oxidative stress than humans.     

A cellular screen identifies ponatinib and pazopanib as inhibitors of necroptosis

Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death mediated by receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3. Necroptotic cell death contributes to the pathophysiology of several disorders involving tissue damage, including myocardial infarction, stroke and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, no inhibitors of necroptosis are currently in clinical use. Here we performed a phenotypic screen for small-molecule inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced necroptosis in Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD)-deficient Jurkat cells using a representative panel of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. We identified two anti-cancer agents, ponatinib and pazopanib, as submicromolar inhibitors of necroptosis. Both compounds inhibited necroptotic cell death induced by various cell death receptor ligands in human cells, while not protecting from apoptosis. Ponatinib and pazopanib abrogated phosphorylation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) upon TNF-α-induced necroptosis, indicating that both agents target a component upstream of MLKL. An unbiased chemical proteomic approach determined the cellular target spectrum of ponatinib, revealing key members of the necroptosis signaling pathway. We validated RIPK1, RIPK3 and transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) as novel, direct targets of ponatinib by using competitive binding, cellular thermal shift and recombinant kinase assays. Ponatinib inhibited both RIPK1 and RIPK3, while pazopanib preferentially targeted RIPK1. The identification of the FDA-approved drugs ponatinib and pazopanib as cellular inhibitors of necroptosis highlights them as potentially interesting for the treatment of pathologies caused or aggravated by necroptotic cell death.Programmed cell death has a crucial role in a variety of biological processes ranging from normal tissue development to diverse pathological conditions.^{1, 2} Necroptosis is a form of regulated cell death that has been shown to occur during pathogen infection or sterile injury-induced inflammation in conditions where apoptosis signaling is compromised.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Given that many viruses have developed strategies to circumvent apoptotic cell death, necroptosis constitutes an important, pro-inflammatory back-up mechanism that limits viral spread in vivo.^{7, 8, 9} In contrast, in the context of sterile inflammation, necroptotic cell death contributes to disease pathology, outlining potential benefits of therapeutic intervention.¹⁰ Necroptosis can be initiated by death receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily,¹¹ Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3),¹² TLR4,¹³ DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors¹⁴ or interferon receptors.¹⁵ Downstream signaling is subsequently conveyed via RIPK1¹⁶ or TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β,^{8, 17} and converges on RIPK3-mediated^{13, 18, 19, 20} activation of MLKL.²¹ Phosphorylated MLKL triggers membrane rupture,^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26} releasing pro-inflammatory cellular contents to the extracellular space.²⁷ Studies using the RIPK1 inhibitor necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) ²⁸ or RIPK3-deficient mice have established a role for necroptosis in the pathophysiology of pancreatitis,¹⁹ artherosclerosis,²⁹ retinal cell death,³⁰ ischemic organ damage and ischemia-reperfusion injury in both the kidney³¹ and the heart.³² Moreover, allografts from RIPK3-deficient mice are better protected from rejection, suggesting necroptosis inhibition as a therapeutic option to improve transplant outcome.³³ Besides Nec-1, several tool compounds inhibiting different pathway members have been described,^{12, 16, 21, 34, 35} however, no inhibitors of necroptosis are available for clinical use so far.^{2, 10} In this study we screened a library of FDA approved drugs for the precise purpose of identifying already existing and generally safe chemical agents that could be used as necroptosis inhibitors. We identified the two structurally distinct kinase inhibitors pazopanib and ponatinib as potent blockers of necroptosis targeting the key enzymes RIPK1/3.     

Spontaneous Osteoblastic Osteosarcoma in a Mongolian Gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus)

Spontaneous neoplasms in Mongolian gerbils have an incidence of 20% to 26.8%, but osteosarcomas occur at a much lower rate. Here we report a 1-y-old Mongolian gerbil with a spontaneous osteosarcoma at the level of the proximal tibia, with metastases to the pectoral muscles and lungs. Grossly, the tibial mass obliterated the tibia and adjacent muscles, and an axillary mass with a bloody, cavitary center expanded the pectoral muscles. Microscopically, the tibial mass was an infiltrative, osteoblastic mesenchymal neoplasm, and the axillary mass was an anaplastic mesenchymal neoplasm with hemorrhage. The lung contained multiple metastatic foci. Immunohistochemistry for osteonectin was strongly positive in the tibial, axillary, and pulmonary metastases. Although osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone neoplasm that occurs spontaneously in all laboratory and domestic animal species and humans, it arises less frequently than does other neoplasms. The current case of spontaneous osteoblastic osteosarcoma of the proximal tibia and metastases to the pectoral muscles and lung in a Mongolian gerbil is similar in presentation, histology, and predilection site of both osteoblastic and telangiectatic osteosarcomas in humans. In addition, this case is an unusual manifestation of osteosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton of a Mongolian gerbil.Mongolian gerbils are used frequently in biologic research,^{1,2,4,9,10,12-14} particularly in oncogenic studies and filariasis research studying Brugia malayi.² There have been several reports^{1,6,10,11,13-15} of spontaneous neoplasms, particularly in gerbils 2 y of age and older, typically occurring with the highest incidences in the skin, reproductive tract, and adrenal glands; however, neoplasms have also been reported in the thyroid, thymus, liver, kidney, pancreas, and bone.^{1,6,10,11,13-15} The incidence of spontaneous neoplasms occurring in the subfamily Gerbillinae ranges from 20% to 26.8%,^{1,6,10,11,13-15} depending on the study, age, and sex of the animals.With a lower incidence than those reported for other neoplasms, osteosarcomas in gerbils have been described in the ramus of the mandible and as an extraskeletal mass throughout the peritoneum.^10,11 The usual age of onset for osteosarcomas in Mongolian gerbils is approximately 3 y (36 to 39 mo); however, no tumor type has been reported at less than 2 y of age in this species.^10,11 Here we report a spontaneous osteosarcoma that occurred at the level of the proximal tibia, with metastases to the pectoral muscles and lung, in a 1-y-old Mongolian gerbil.     

FIBRILLIN4 Is Required for Plastoglobule Development and Stress Resistance in Apple and Arabidopsis

The fibrillins are a large family of chloroplast proteins that have been linked with stress tolerance and disease resistance. FIBRILLIN4 (FIB4) is found associated with the photosystem II light-harvesting complex, thylakoids, and plastoglobules, which are chloroplast compartments rich in lipophilic antioxidants. For this study, FIB4 expression was knocked down in apple (Malus 3 domestica) using RNA interference. Plastoglobule osmiophilicity was decreased in fib4 knockdown (fib4 KD) tree chloroplasts compared with the wild type, while total plastoglobule number was unchanged. Compared with the wild type, net photosynthetic CO₂ fixation in fib4 KD trees was decreased at high light intensity but was increased at low light intensity. Furthermore, fib4 KD trees produced more anthocyanins than the wild type when transferred from low to high light intensity, indicating greater sensitivity to high light stress. Relative to the wild type, fib4 KD apples were more sensitive to methyl viologen and had higher superoxide levels during methyl viologen treatment. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) fib4 mutants and fib4 KD apples were more susceptible than their wild-type counterparts to the bacterial pathogens Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato and Erwinia amylovora, respectively, and were more sensitive to ozone-induced tissue damage. Following ozone stress, plastoglobule osmiophilicity decreased in wild-type apple and remained low in fib4 KD trees; total plastoglobule number increased in fib4 KD apples but not in the wild type. These results indicate that FIB4 is required for plastoglobule development and resistance to multiple stresses. This study suggests that FIB4 is involved in regulating plastoglobule content and that defective regulation of plastoglobule content leads to broad stress sensitivity and altered photosynthetic activity.Increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is among the first biochemical responses of plants when challenged by pathogens and harsh environmental conditions (Mehdy, 1994; Lamb and Dixon, 1997; Joo et al., 2005). ROS are implicated in tissue damage during environmental stress and in the promotion of disease development by necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens (Venisse et al., 2001; Apel and Hirt, 2004; Shetty et al., 2008). For example, ROS production is critical for host colonization and pathogenesis by the bacterium Erwinia amylovora, which causes fire blight disease in rosaceous plants such as apple (Malus 3 domestica) and pear (Pyrus communis; Venisse et al., 2001).The chloroplast is a site of ROS production during biotic and abiotic stress (Joo et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2007). The chloroplast has a battery of enzymes such as superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase, and antioxidants such as ascorbate, glutathione, and tocopherols, for protection against ROS (Noctor and Foyer, 1998; Asada, 2006). Plastoglobules are lipoprotein bodies attached to the thylakoids (Austin et al., 2006) that store lipids, including antioxidants such as tocopherols, carotenes, and plastoquinones (Steinmüller and Tevini, 1985; Tevini and Steinmüller, 1985). In addition to antioxidants, plastoglobules contain tocopherol cyclase, which is involved in γ-tocopherol synthesis (Austin et al., 2006; Vidi et al., 2006). The antioxidant content of plastoglobules and their apparent involvement in tocopherol biosynthesis imply that they could play a role in plant responses to oxidative stress.Plastoglobules contain fibrillins, which were initially described as protein components of chromoplast fibrils with a molecular mass of approximately 30 kD (Winkenbach et al., 1976; Knoth et al., 1986; Emter et al., 1990; Deruère et al., 1994). Fibrillins are ubiquitous proteins present from cyanobacteria to plants (Laizet et al., 2004). Fibrillins maintain plastoglobule structural integrity (Deruère et al., 1994; Pozueta-Romero et al., 1997; Langenkämper et al., 2001; Vidi et al., 2006; Bréhélin et al., 2007) and stabilize the photosynthetic apparatus during photooxidative stress (Gillet et al., 1998; Yang et al., 2006; Youssef et al., 2010), osmotic stress (Gillet et al., 1998), drought (Pruvot et al., 1996; Rey et al., 2000), and low temperature (Rorat et al., 2001). Fibrillins are involved in abscisic acid-mediated protection from photoinhibition (Yang et al., 2006), and a subfamily of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) fibrillins (FIB1a, -1b, and -2) conditions jasmonate production during low-temperature, photooxidative stress (Youssef et al., 2010). Arabidopsis plants lacking one fibrillin (At4g22240) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants with suppressed expression of a fibrillin (LeCHRC) are susceptible to Pseudomonas syringae and Botrytis cinerea, respectively (Cooper et al., 2003; Leitner-Dagan et al., 2006), indicating that fibrillins play a role in disease resistance.The Arabidopsis fibrillin encoded by At3g23400 has received various appellations, including FIBRILLIN4 (FIB4; Laizet et al., 2004), Harpin-Binding Protein1 (Song et al., 2002), AtPGL 30.4 (Vidi et al., 2006), and Fibrillin6 (Galetskiy et al., 2008); here, it will be referred to by its earliest published name, FIB4. FIB4 is found associated with the PSII light-harvesting complex (Galetskiy et al., 2008). FIB4 has also been detected in plastoglobules (Vidi et al., 2006; Ytterberg et al., 2006) and thylakoids (Friso et al., 2004; Peltier et al., 2004). However, the specific function of FIB4 is unknown. Several lines of evidence suggest that FIB4 may be involved in plant disease resistance responses: pathogen-associated molecular patterns trigger its phosphorylation (Jones et al., 2006); pathogen-associated molecular patterns stimulate the expression of its ortholog in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum; Jones et al., 2006; Sanabria and Dubery, 2006); and it can physically interact with the HrpN (harpin) virulence protein of the fire blight pathogen E. amylovora in a yeast two-hybrid assay, suggesting that it could be a receptor or target of HrpN (Song et al., 2002). In addition, it is thought that FIB4 may be involved in the transport of small, hydrophobic molecules because it contains a conserved lipocalin signature (Jones et al., 2006). Here, we report a genetic analysis of FIB4 function in apple and Arabidopsis in terms of its role in plastoglobule development and plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses.