Value of CA 19-9 assay in serum and duodenal juice in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic disease

Levels of CA 19-9 in the serum and duodenal juice of nine patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC), ten patients with chronic calcifying pancreatitis (CCP) and ten healthy volunteers (C) were determined by immunoassay. Duodenal juice was obtained by duodenal intubation during the secretin caerulein test. Elevated CA 19-9 levels in the serum were significantly more frequent in PC than in CCP patients, but two PC patients gave levels only slightly above the cut-off value of 37 U/ml. CA 19-9 levels in duodenal juice were significantly higher in PC than in CCP patient, but there was some overlap between them; no overlapping was seen between PC or CCP group and controls. Two PC patients with duodenal juice CA 19-9 levels overlapping those of CCP were the same who showed only a slight rise in serum CA 19-9 levels. The CA 19-9 to total protein ratio in duodenal juice did not permit better discrimination between PC and CCP. We conclude that CA 19-9 assay in duodenal juice can differentiate healthy subjects from patients with pancreatic diseases, but it cannot improve the differential diagnosis between CCP and PC patients with a slight rise of CA 19-9 levels in serum.     

The distribution and localization of the monoclonal antibody-defined antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. An immunohistochemical study

The carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is considered to be of great importance in the diagnosis, differential diagnosis and follow-up of human pancreatic carcinoma. CA19-9 antigen has been isolated and characterized as the oligosaccharide sialylazed lacto-N-fucopentaose II and a monoclonal antibody against CA19-9 is commercially available. In this immunochemical study we have examined the localisation and distribution of monoclonal anti-CA19-9 in pancreatic tissue obtained from 20 patients with a normal pancreas (lacking pancreatic tumour or evidence of inflammation), from 50 patients with chronic pancreatitis and from 50 patients with pancreatic carcinomas of various types. In the normal pancreas (free from tumour or inflammation) we found anti-CA19-9 to be localized in the branches of the pancreatic ducts with discontinuities predominantly at the apical surfaces of the lining epithelium. In chronic pancreatitis a continuous positive reaction was found in the small, medium and large ramifications of the pancreatic ducts. In ductal epithelium exhibiting mucoid transformation, a mosaic-like, discontinuous positive reaction was found, whereas in epithelium showing pseudopapillary and papillary hyperplasia a uniform positive reaction was obtained. Multilayered epithelium ("squamous metaplasia") was negative. The fluid content of any cysts present and the tubular accumulations found in chronic pancreatitis showed a positive reaction. The reaction in chronic pancreatitis differed from that in normal pancreas in its distribution but not in its intensity. All carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas showed intensely positive reaction in a very varied distribution whereas the anaplastic carcinomas gave a negative reaction. Whilst in chronic pancreatitis the binding of anti-CA19-9 was unimpressive and strictly localized, in exocrine pancreatic carcinomas binding was and strictly localized, in exocrine pancreatic carcinomas binding was very marked and diffuse in distribution. From this we conclude that malignant cells display a greater number of CA19-9 epitopes than cells in chronic pancreatitis. The difference can only be regarded as quantitative, since the immunohistochemical reaction does not allow qualitative discrimination between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma; CA19-9 should not be therefore termed a "tumour marker". The glycoprotein nature of CA19-9 was confirmed by sialidase and chemical desialylation.     

Can IL-2R alpha be a valuable marker along with CA 19-9 in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer?

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is characterized initially by non-specific abdominal symptoms followed by rapid tumor progression. Although chronic pancreatitis is a benign disorder, it can be one of the causative factors of pancreatic cancer. The level of the tumor marker carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) in pancreatic cancer does not correlate with the stage of the neoplasm. Soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) is a cytokine that shows increased levels during some inflammatory processes and malignant disorders. AIM: Our aim in this study was to investigate whether sIL-2Ralpha levels can be used in association with CA 19-9 in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. PATIENTS: Serum samples were obtained from the blood of 21 pancreatic cancer patients without distant metastasis who were deemed inoperable, 16 chronic pancreatitis patients and 20 normal volunteers. RESULTS: We did not find any significant differences in CA 19-9 levels between normal controls and patients with chronic pancreatitis. There was a significant difference in the levels between the control group and the pancreatic cancer group (p = 0.003) and between patients with chronic pancreatitis and those with pancreatic cancer (p = 0.004). Although there was no significant difference in sIL-2Ralpha levels between the control group and the patient groups, we found a slight correlation between sIL-2Ralpha and CA 19-9 levels in the pancreatic cancer group (p = 0.003, r = 0.623) and a more marked correlation in the chronic pancreatitis group (p < 0.01, r = 0.751). CONCLUSION: According to our results, sIL-2Ralpha alone is not a good candidate marker in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer; it can, however, be used in association with CA 19-9 for this purpose.     

The significance of CA19-9 tumor antigen in the serum of patients with carcinomas

The concentration of serum CA19-9TM in 101 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), and 109 patients with carcinomas of lung, breast, stomach and pancreas and hepatoma, and 40 normal healthy controls including an equal number of smokers and nonsmokers were determined by solid phase radioimmunoassay of CA19-9 assay kits (Centocor). Of the normal sera, only 1 out of 40 (2.5%) was over 37.6 U/ml. No significant difference of CA19-9 levels was found between smokers (14.4 +/- 9.0 U/ml) and non-smokers (16.0 +/- 10.2 U/ml) of normal control. In patients sera, the mean value of CA19-9 levels was significantly higher in patients with Dukes B (P less than 0.05) and in patients with Dukes C and D (P less than 0.001) than the normal healthy control (15.2 +/- 10.2 U/ml). Analysis of serum CEA concentrations has shown a similar result in patients with all Dukes staged CRC. The CA19-9 levels was also significantly elevated in patients with gastric carcinoma, lung carcinoma, hepatoma, and especially in patients with pancreatic carcinoma (P less than 0.0001). The levels of CA19-9 elevated in 50% (22/44) of patients with advanced CRC while the elevation was 8 of 43 (18.6%) patients with localized CRC. A comparison of CA19-9 and CEA assays showed no correlation (r = 0.125) between the two assays. Although the CA19-9 assay (26.4%) was less sensitive than the CEA assay (51.7%), the specificity of CA19-9 assay (97.5%) was better than that of CEA assay (87.5%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Improved Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Diagnosis in Jaundiced and Non-Jaundiced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Patients through the Combination of Routine Clinical Markers Associated to Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Pathophysiology

Background

There is still no reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA 19–9) is a tumor marker only recommended for pancreatic adenocarcinoma follow-up. One of the clinical problems lies in distinguishing between this cancer and other benign pancreatic diseases such as chronic pancreatitis. In this study we will assess the value of panels of serum molecules related to pancreatic cancer physiopathology to determine whether alone or in combination could help to discriminate between these two pathologies.

Methods

CA 19–9, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), C-reactive protein, albumin, insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and IGF binding protein-3 were measured using routine clinical analyzers in a cohort of 47 pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 20 chronic pancreatitis and 15 healthy controls.

Results

The combination of CA 19–9, IGF-1 and albumin resulted in a combined area under the curve (AUC) of 0.959 with 93.6% sensitivity and 95% specificity, much higher than CA 19–9 alone. An algorithm was defined to classify the patients as chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer with the above specificity and sensitivity. In an independent validation group of 20 pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 13 chronic pancreatitis patients, the combination of the four molecules classified correctly all pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 12 out of 13 chronic pancreatitis patients.

Conclusions

Although this panel of markers should be validated in larger cohorts, the high sensitivity and specificity values and the convenience to measure these parameters in clinical laboratories shows great promise for improving pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosis.     

The clinical relevance of tumor marker CEA, CA 19-9 in regional chemotherapy of hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma

Up to December 1986, 50 patients with documented hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma were treated with 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine (FUDR) using Infusaid pumps. The response of liver metastases to regional chemotherapy was studied by computerized tomography (CT) and carcino-embryonal antigen (CEA), and/or CA 19-9 antigen serum assays. Preoperative CEA values were pathological in 94% of the patients but only 48% had a pathological concentration of the antigen CA 19-9 of over 37 U/ml. The course of CEA and CA 19-9 in combination with the arterial angio-CT reflected the response of liver metastases to regional chemotherapy. A decrease or normalisation of CEA and CA 19-9 after the beginning of therapy is an indication of partial or complete remission of metastases (68% of the patients showed lowered CEA serum values). If the marker continues to rise in serum this is a danger signal of progression of liver metastases or of extrahepatic tumor spread if the tumor stage in the liver remains unchanged.     

Prognostic significance of CEA and CA 19-9 in colorectal cancer in Kuwait

Preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels have been used in the past as prognostic indicators in colorectal cancer, but Dukes' stage is still considered to be the most important prognostic factor. Recent survival estimates may have been influenced by the fact that in the last decade adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative irradiation have been included in the routine management of advanced-stage disease. In a heterogeneous Kuwaiti population higher reference levels (95th percentile) of CEA and CA 19-9 have been found than those usually employed. In the present study 62 patients with Dukes' stage B + C could be analyzed for two-year disease-free survival (DFS). Relapse was observed in 19 patients, 28 patients were disease free and 15 patients with censored observations were included. No significant difference in DFS was observed in Dukes' B (69%) versus Dukes' C (48%) patients (p = 0.09). On the other hand, Dukes' stage B + C patients with elevated preoperative levels of CEA or CA 19-9 had a significantly poorer DFS than patients with normal levels. For CEA levels below or above the cutoff the DFS was 74% versus 23% (p = 0.003); for CA 19-9 levels below or above the cutoff the DFS was 71% versus 33% (p = 0.004). In 54 patients with Dukes' stage B + C for whom preoperative levels of both CEA and CA 19-9 were available multivariate analysis revealed a decreasing risk of relapse in the following order: CEA and/or CA 19-9 elevated (chi-square 7.09; p = 0.008), CA 19-9 elevated (chi-square 6.27; p = 0.01), CEA elevated (chi-square 5.47; p = 0.02), and Dukes' C (chi-square 2.08; p = 0.15 n.s.). Hence, novel treatment protocols may have improved the disease-free survival, but the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy is of questionable benefit in patients who have elevated levels of CEA and/or CA 19-9 prior to treatment.     

血清miR-92a在胰腺癌诊断及预后评估中的临床意义研究

目的:探讨血清miR-92a在胰腺癌诊断和预后分析中的价值,为胰腺癌早诊断以及预后评估提供潜在的分子标志物。方法:回顾性分析我院及重庆医科大学附属第一、第二医院2014年8月~2016年12月收治的30例胰腺癌未转移患者、30例胰腺癌转移患者和30例慢性胰腺炎患者的临床资料,另选择同期在我院进行健康体检的30例健康人作为健康组。收集血清,应用定量PCR法检测各组血清miR-92a的表达水平,利用化学发光法检测各组血清中的糖蛋白抗原19-9(CA-19-9)含量。以ROC分析比较血清miR-92a与CA 19-9在胰腺癌诊断中的特异度、敏感性。结果:胰腺癌未转移组患者和胰腺癌转移组患者血清中miR-92a水平显著高于健康组和慢性胰腺炎组(P0.05),胰腺癌转移组患者血清中miR-92a水平显著高于胰腺癌未转移组患者(P0.05)。胰腺癌未转移组患者和胰腺癌转移组患者血清中CA19-9水平显著高于健康组和慢性胰腺炎组(P0.05)。miR-92a诊断胰腺癌的敏感度高于CA19-9和miR-92a+CA 19-9,而miR-92a+CA 19-9诊断胰腺癌的特异度显著高于miR-92a和CA19-9(P0.05),且有较高的胰腺癌转移预测应用价值。结论:血清miR-92a联合CA 19-9检测能够诊断胰腺癌,具有良好的敏感度和特异度,miR-92a还具有较好的胰腺癌转移预测价值,可作为胰腺癌早期无创筛查方法加以应用。     

Relationship of CA 125 and CA 19.9 with lung carcinoma histological subtype: preliminary study

The aim of this work was to study the possible utility of simultaneous determination of CA 125 and CA 19.9 in patients with lung cancer. Serum levels of both markers were studied in 87 patients without metastases (Mo), 72 patients with distant metastases (MT) and 15 cases without clinical evidence of disease after primary treatment (NED). Sixty-five tumors were epidermoid, 34 were adenocarcinomas, 24 were cell undifferentiated carcinomas and 51 were small-cell carcinomas. Sera from 75 healthy subjects and 20 patients with benign lung disease were used as controls. The cut-off values used were 35 and 37 U/ml for CA 125 and CA 19.9, respectively. CA 125 and CA 19.9 serum levels were within normal limits in all control patients. In NED patients these markers were not elevated, except in one with chronic liver disease who showed elevated CA 19.9 (76 U/ml). Twenty-five percent of Mo lung cancer patients and 40.3% of MT cases had CA 19.9 over 37 U/ml. Abnormally high levels of CA 125 were found in 18.7% and 22.9% of Mo and MT patients, respectively. Sixty percent of patients with large cell undifferentiated carcinoma had elevated CA 125 (mean 176 U/ml) compared to 15.4% of patients with all other histological types of tumors combined (54.3 U/ml, p less than 0.01). CA 19.9 serum levels were also more often elevated in patients with large cell undifferentiated carcinomas (50%, 7/14 cases) than in other histological types (30%, 36/120 patients), but the difference was not statistically significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Secretome-based identification of ULBP2 as a novel serum marker for pancreatic cancer detection

Background

To discover novel markers for improving the efficacy of pancreatic cancer (PC) diagnosis, the secretome of two PC cell lines (BxPC-3 and MIA PaCa-2) was profiled. UL16 binding protein 2 (ULBP2), one of the proteins identified in the PC cell secretome, was selected for evaluation as a biomarker for PC detection because its mRNA level was also found to be significantly elevated in PC tissues.

Methods

ULBP2 expression in PC tissues from 67 patients was studied by immunohistochemistry. ULBP2 serum levels in 154 PC patients and 142 healthy controls were measured by bead-based immunoassay, and the efficacy of serum ULBP2 for PC detection was compared with the widely used serological PC marker carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9).

Results

Immunohistochemical analyses revealed an elevated expression of ULPB2 in PC tissues compared with adjacent non-cancerous tissues. Meanwhile, the serum levels of ULBP2 among all PC patients (n = 154) and in early-stage cancer patients were significantly higher than those in healthy controls (p<0.0001). The combination of ULBP2 and CA 19-9 outperformed each marker alone in distinguishing PC patients from healthy individuals. Importantly, an analysis of the area under receiver operating characteristic curves showed that ULBP2 was superior to CA 19-9 in discriminating patients with early-stage PC from healthy controls.

Conclusions

Collectively, our results indicate that ULBP2 may represent a novel and useful serum biomarker for pancreatic cancer primary screening.     

Relationship between mesenteric and peripheral blood levels of CA 19-9 in patients with colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION: CA19-9 is one of the most important tumor markers used in patients with colorectal cancer, mainly in radical surgery follow-up. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the preoperative CA19-9 level obtained from a peripheral vein (PV) and compare it to the level obtained from the mesenteric vein (MV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood was collected from a PV of the arm and from the MV of 59 patients with colorectal cancer before primary surgery. Of these 59 patients fourteen had stage I disease, 10 stage II, 22 stage III, and 13 stage IV. CA19-9 was determined in serum by immunoenzymatic assay (Abbott Diagnostica). RESULTS: Fifteen patients (24%) had elevated serum levels of CA19-9 in the MV and 13 (22%) in the PV. None of the stage I or II patients had elevated serum levels of CA19-9. There were no differences between marker levels in blood collected from the MV or PV, independent of clinical stage. The CA19-9 values obtained from the MV differed significantly in the different stages of the disease according to the Kruskal-Wallis analysis (p=0.026); this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.08) in serum from the PV. There was no correlation between venous infiltration by the tumor and positivity of CA19-9 serum levels collected from the mesenteric vein. We observed a close correlation between the serum levels of CA19-9 collected from the PV and from the MV (r=0.9). CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates a close correlation between the serum levels of CA19-9 collected from a peripheral vein and from the mesenteric vein. Our results confirmed the poor sensitivity of serum CA19-9 at diagnosis, independent of the collection site.     

Diverse monoclonal antibodies against the CA 19-9 antigen show variation in binding specificity with consequences for clinical interpretation

The CA 19-9 antigen is currently the best individual marker for the detection of pancreatic cancer. In order to optimize the CA 19-9 assay and to develop approaches to further improve cancer detection, it is important to understand the specificity differences between CA 19-9 antibodies and the consequential affect on biomarker performance. Antibody arrays enabled multiplexed comparisons between five different CA 19-9 antibodies used in the analysis of plasma samples from pancreatic cancer patients and controls. Major differences were observed between antibodies in their detection of particular patient samples. Glycan array analysis revealed that certain antibodies were highly specific for the canonical CA 19-9 epitope, sialyl-Lewis A, while others bound sialyl-Lewis A in addition to a related structure called sialyl-Lewis C and modification with Nue5Gc. In a much larger patient cohort, we confirmed the binding of sialyl-Lewis C glycan by one of the antibodies and showed that the broader specificity led to the detection of an increased number of cancer patients without increasing detection of pancreatitis patient samples. This work demonstrates that variation between antibody specificity for cancer-associated glycans can have significant implications for biomarker performance and highlights the value of characterizing and detecting the range of glycan structures that are elevated in cancer.     

Tumor markers, liver function tests and symptoms in 115 patients with isolated colorectal liver metastases

Development of the hybridoma technique has made the identification of several new tumor antigens possible. Although it was hoped that they would be more tumor-specific, none of these markers are found exclusively in tumor or in serum of tumor patients. Compared with carcinoembryionic antigen (CEA) and liver function tests, the roles of these markers (CA 19-9, CA 125, CA 15-3) were prospectively evaluated in 115 patients with colorectal liver metastases. Patients were classified according to tumor volume (T1 less than 25%, T2 25-75%, T3 greater than 75%), and the extension of infiltration (solitary/multiple/diffuse; unilateral, bilateral). Patients with benign liver or biliary disease served as a control group (n = 63). Overall sensitivity was 87% for *1, 50% for *2 and 38% for *3, with a significant correlation with tumor size. CEA serum levels were elevated in 88% of all patients. CA 19-9 was less sensitive: positive in 59%. Because of some complementary elevations, the combined use of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 125 raised sensitivity to 94%. CA 19-9 and LDH could be useful for confirmation because of their higher specificity; however, the specificity of CEA rose to 93% on using a cut-off of 10 ng/ml instead of 3 ng/ml. The results indicate that CEA and CA 19-9 as well as liver function tests are helpful for preoperative staging in conjunction with imaging procedures before liver resection or regional chemotherapy.     

化学发光蛋白芯片用于检测肝癌患者血清CA19-9水平的方法研究

目的:探讨一种简单、有效、低成本、低耗时的化学发光蛋白芯片方法用于检测血清中的糖链抗原19-9(Carbohydrate Antigen19-9,CA19-9),以有助于对原发性肝癌的早期辅助诊断。方法:预先在醛基芯片上包被鼠源CA19-9单克隆抗体,建立CA19-9抗体蛋白芯片,共筛选出46份肝癌血清和32份正常健康人血清,然后用蛋白芯片方法进行检测,并以化学发光成像对检测结果进行判定。结果:24份肝癌血清的CA19-9水平高于37 U/m L,22份肝癌血清的CA19-9水平低于37 U/m L;30份正常人血清CA19-9含量低于37 U/m L,2份正常人血清的CA19-9含量为37 U/m L;灵敏度为52.17%,特异性为93.75%,ROC曲线下面积0.688[95%CI:0.566,0.811]。结论:本研究成功的建立了血清CA19-9的化学发光蛋白芯片检测方法。     

Arginase as a useful factor for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer liver metastases

The present work is a continuation of studies on arginase as a marker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). The purpose of the study was the evaluation of the arginase test in comparison with other colorectal cancer tests such as CEA, CA 19-9 and biochemical markers of liver function such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The studies were conducted on blood serum from 85 patients with CRCLM obtained one to two days before tumor resection. The control group comprised 140 healthy blood donors and 81 patients with various non-malignant gastrointestinal diseases. Raised arginase activity was observed in serum of 85% of CRCLM patients, whereas elevated levels of CEA and CA 19-9 were found in 63% and 42% of patients, respectively. The combination of CEA or CA 19-9 with the arginase assay improved their sensitivity, but the sensitivity of the combined parameters was not higher than that of the arginase test itself. AST and ALT activities were increased in about 30% of CRCLM patients. The specificity of the arginase test calculated for 221 control subjects was 76%. It can thus be concluded that the determination of serum arginase activity can be helpful in the diagnosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases.     

Circulating CA 15.3 levels in breast cancer. Our present experience

CA 15.3 is an antigen expressed by human breast carcinoma cells, and defined by two monoclonal antibodies, 115D8 and DF3. We used IRMA to determine the circulating serum levels of CA 15.3 in 1178 subjects with breast cancer, non-breast malignancies, benign diseases and controls. A threshold level of 40 U/ml was established with 140 healthy controls and 650 patients with benign diseases (respectively 0% subjects and 1.5% patients had abnormal antigen levels). Elevated CA 15.3 was found in 12 of 184 patients with malignancies different from breast cancer (6.5%), either epithelial carcinomas with distant metastases, mainly in the liver, or primary liver tumors. Breast cancer patients (n = 204) were analysed by prior therapy, UICC stage and WHO response to therapy. Eight of 134 (5.9%) patients with stage II or III breast cancer at presentation and no evidence of disease (NED) had elevated CA 15.3. All of 22 patients with stage IV breast cancer not responding to therapy (SD and PD) had antigen levels greater than 40 U/ml, as did 10 of 34 (29.4%) stage IV patients in objective response (CR + PR). Three of 14 pretreatment patients had abnormal marker levels, and they later proved to have distant metastases. Serum CA 15.3 values were statistically different (p less than 0.01) in NED (20.6 +/- 11.2 U/ml), CR + PR (33.5 +/- 24.0 U/ml), stable disease (98.8 +/- 50.4 U/ml) and progressive disease (greater than 200 U/ml) breast cancer patients. Our results suggest that circulating CA 15.3 antigen levels agree with the stage of breast cancer and with the response to therapy.     

Enhanced discrimination of malignant from benign pancreatic disease by measuring the CA 19-9 antigen on specific protein carriers

The CA 19-9 assay detects a carbohydrate antigen on multiple protein carriers, some of which may be preferential carriers of the antigen in cancer. We tested the hypothesis that the measurement of the CA 19-9 antigen on individual proteins could improve performance over the standard CA 19-9 assay. We used antibody arrays to measure the levels of the CA 19-9 antigen on multiple proteins in serum or plasma samples from patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma or pancreatitis. Sample sets from three different institutions were examined, comprising 531 individual samples. The measurement of the CA 19-9 antigen on any individual protein did not improve upon the performance of the standard CA 19-9 assay (82% sensitivity at 75% specificity for early-stage cancer), owing to diversity among patients in their CA 19-9 protein carriers. However, a subset of cancer patients with no elevation in the standard CA 19-9 assay showed elevations of the CA 19-9 antigen specifically on the proteins MUC5AC or MUC16 in all sample sets. By combining measurements of the standard CA 19-9 assay with detection of CA 19-9 on MUC5AC and MUC16, the sensitivity of cancer detection was improved relative to CA 19-9 alone in each sample set, achieving 67-80% sensitivity at 98% specificity. This finding demonstrates the value of measuring glycans on specific proteins for improving biomarker performance. Diagnostic tests with improved sensitivity for detecting pancreatic cancer could have important applications for improving the treatment and management of patients suffering from this disease.     

Definitive Characterization of CA 19-9 in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Using a Reference Set of Serum and Plasma Specimens

The validation of candidate biomarkers often is hampered by the lack of a reliable means of assessing and comparing performance. We present here a reference set of serum and plasma samples to facilitate the validation of biomarkers for resectable pancreatic cancer. The reference set includes a large cohort of stage I-II pancreatic cancer patients, recruited from 5 different institutions, and relevant control groups. We characterized the performance of the current best serological biomarker for pancreatic cancer, CA 19–9, using plasma samples from the reference set to provide a benchmark for future biomarker studies and to further our knowledge of CA 19–9 in early-stage pancreatic cancer and the control groups. CA 19–9 distinguished pancreatic cancers from the healthy and chronic pancreatitis groups with an average sensitivity and specificity of 70–74%, similar to previous studies using all stages of pancreatic cancer. Chronic pancreatitis patients did not show CA 19–9 elevations, but patients with benign biliary obstruction had elevations nearly as high as the cancer patients. We gained additional information about the biomarker by comparing two distinct assays. The two CA 9–9 assays agreed well in overall performance but diverged in measurements of individual samples, potentially due to subtle differences in antibody specificity as revealed by glycan array analysis. Thus, the reference set promises be a valuable resource for biomarker validation and comparison, and the CA 19–9 data presented here will be useful for benchmarking and for exploring relationships to CA 19–9.     

消化道微生态与胰腺疾病

消化道微生态参与人体多种生理及病理过程,是消化领域的研究热点。消化道微生态可能与急慢性胰腺炎和胰腺癌等胰腺疾病关系密切,但学术界很少关注。慢性胰腺炎患者存在肠道菌群结构失衡,并易伴发小肠细菌过度生长。肠道菌群可能与自身免疫性胰腺炎等IgG4相关性疾病关系密切。急性胰腺炎患者存在肠道菌群结构变化,肠道屏障功能受损和细菌移位在急性胰腺炎疾病进展中起重要作用,但不同类型和疾病程度的急性胰腺炎患者肠道菌群结构和功能特征仍不清楚。牙周疾病和口腔微生态失衡会增加罹患胰腺癌的风险,但胰腺癌时肠道菌群的具体变化及作用仍不明确。本文就各类胰腺疾病背景下的消化道微生态研究现状及未来可能的研究方向进行阐述     

CA19-9及CA72-4联合检测在胰腺癌诊断中的应用价值

目的:探究联合检测血清糖类抗原(CA)19-9和CA72-4水平在胰腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法:回顾性选取我院2016年1月～2017年12月收治的72例胰腺癌患者作为胰腺癌组,以同期住院的68例良性胰腺病患者作为良性胰腺疾病组,同时纳入67例健康体检者作为对照组。检测三组人群血清CA19-9和CA72-4水平,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)及曲线下面积(AUC)分析评估各单项检测指标及联合检测指标对胰腺癌特异性诊断的价值。结果:胰腺癌组患者血清CA19-9和CA72-4水平分别为(137.69±25.32)U/mL和(6.96±1.25)U/mL,显著高于良性胰腺疾病组和对照组(P0.05)。血清CA19-9和CA72-4联合检测诊断胰腺癌的ROC曲线AUC高于其单独检测(P0.05),CA19-9和CA72-4的最佳临界值分别为86.94 U/m L和4.23 U/m L,此时联合检测诊断胰腺癌的敏感性为94.7%,特异性为95.2%。结论:联合检测血清CA19-9和CA72-4诊断胰腺癌的临床价值明显优于其单独检测。