Cohesion promotes nucleolar structure and function

The cohesin complex contributes to ribosome function, although the molecular mechanisms involved are unclear. Compromised cohesin function is associated with a class of diseases known as cohesinopathies. One cohesinopathy, Roberts syndrome (RBS), occurs when a mutation reduces acetylation of the cohesin Smc3 subunit. Mutation of the cohesin acetyltransferase is associated with impaired rRNA production, ribosome biogenesis, and protein synthesis in yeast and human cells. Cohesin binding to the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is evolutionarily conserved from bacteria to human cells. We report that the RBS mutation in yeast (eco1-W216G) exhibits a disorganized nucleolus and reduced looping at the rDNA. RNA polymerase I occupancy of the genes remains normal, suggesting that recruitment is not impaired. Impaired rRNA production in the RBS mutant coincides with slower rRNA cleavage. In addition to the RBS mutation, mutations in any subunit of the cohesin ring are associated with defects in ribosome biogenesis. Depletion or artificial destruction of cohesion in a single cell cycle is associated with loss of nucleolar integrity, demonstrating that the defects at the rDNA can be directly attributed to loss of cohesion. Our results strongly suggest that organization of the rDNA provided by cohesion is critical for formation and function of the nucleolus.     

Stimulation of mTORC1 with L-leucine Rescues Defects Associated with Roberts Syndrome

Roberts syndrome (RBS) is a human disease characterized by defects in limb and craniofacial development and growth and mental retardation. RBS is caused by mutations in ESCO2, a gene which encodes an acetyltransferase for the cohesin complex. While the essential role of the cohesin complex in chromosome segregation has been well characterized, it plays additional roles in DNA damage repair, chromosome condensation, and gene expression. The developmental phenotypes of Roberts syndrome and other cohesinopathies suggest that gene expression is impaired during embryogenesis. It was previously reported that ribosomal RNA production and protein translation were impaired in immortalized RBS cells. It was speculated that cohesin binding at the rDNA was important for nucleolar form and function. We have explored the hypothesis that reduced ribosome function contributes to RBS in zebrafish models and human cells. Two key pathways that sense cellular stress are the p53 and mTOR pathways. We report that mTOR signaling is inhibited in human RBS cells based on the reduced phosphorylation of the downstream effectors S6K1, S6 and 4EBP1, and this correlates with p53 activation. Nucleoli, the sites of ribosome production, are highly fragmented in RBS cells. We tested the effect of inhibiting p53 or stimulating mTOR in RBS cells. The rescue provided by mTOR activation was more significant, with activation rescuing both cell division and cell death. To study this cohesinopathy in a whole animal model we used ESCO2-mutant and morphant zebrafish embryos, which have developmental defects mimicking RBS. Consistent with RBS patient cells, the ESCO2 mutant embryos show p53 activation and inhibition of the TOR pathway. Stimulation of the TOR pathway with L-leucine rescued many developmental defects of ESCO2-mutant embryos. Our data support the idea that RBS can be attributed in part to defects in ribosome biogenesis, and stimulation of the TOR pathway has therapeutic potential.     

Eco1 is important for DNA damage repair in S. cerevisiae

The cohesin network has an essential role in chromosome segregation, but also plays a role in DNA damage repair. Eco1 is an acetyltransferase that targets subunits of the cohesin complex and is involved in both the chromosome segregation and DNA damage repair roles of the network. Using budding yeast as a model system, we find that mutations in Eco1, including a genocopy of a human Roberts syndrome allele, do not cause gross defects in chromosome cohesion. We examined how mitotic and meiotic DNA damage repair is affected by mutations in Eco1. Strains containing mutations in Eco1 are sensitive to DNA damaging agents that cause double-strand breaks, such as X-rays and bleomycin. While meiotic crossing over is relatively unaffected in strains containing the Roberts mutation, reciprocal mitotic crossovers occur with extremely low frequency in this mutant background. Our results suggest that Eco1 promotes the reciprocal exchange of chromosome arms and maintenance of heterozygosity during mitosis.Key words: cohesin, recombination, double-strand break, acetyltransferase, Roberts syndrome     

Eco1 is important for DNA damage repair in S. cerevisiae

The cohesin network has an essential role in chromosome segregation, but also plays a role in DNA damage repair. Eco1 is an acetyltransferase that targets subunits of the cohesin complex and is involved in both the chromosome segregation and DNA damage repair roles of the network. Using budding yeast as a model system, we find that mutations in Eco1, including a genocopy of a human Roberts syndrome allele, do not cause gross defects in chromosome cohesion. We examined how mitotic and meiotic DNA damage repair is affected by mutations in Eco1. Strains containing mutations in Eco1 are sensitive to DNA damaging agents that cause double-strand breaks, such as Xrays and bleomycin. While meiotic crossing over is relatively unaffected in strains containing the Roberts mutation, reciprocal mitotic crossovers occur with extremely low frequency in this mutant background. Our results suggest that Eco1 promotes the reciprocal exchange of chromosome arms and maintenance of heterozygosity during mitosis.     

A Gcn4p homolog is essential for the induction of a ribosomal protein L41 variant responsible for cycloheximide resistance in the yeast Candida maltosa

Cycloheximide (CYH) resistance in the yeast Candida maltosa is based on the inducible expression of genes encoding a variant of ribosomal protein L41-Q, with glutamine at position 56 instead of the proline found in normal L41. The promoter of L41-Q2a, one of the L41-Q gene alleles encoding L41-Q, has an element similar to the Gcn4p-responsive element of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In a previous study, this element was shown to be essential for the induction of L41-Q by CYH. In the present study, a C. maltosa GCN4 homolog, C-GCN4, was cloned. It had a long 5'-leader region with three upstream open reading frames. Enhanced expression of the C-GCN4 reporter fusion gene upon the addition of 3-aminotriazole or by mutations in start codons of all three upstream open reading frames indicates that C-GCN4 expression is under translation repression as was seen with GCN4. The C-GCN4-depleted mutant was unable to grow in a nutrient medium containing CYH and did not express L41-Q genes. Recombinant C-Gcn4p bound to the consensus DNA element for Gcn4p, 5'-(G/A)TGACTCAT-3', located upstream of L41-Q2a. Thus, C-Gcn4p, which likely functions in the general control of amino acid biosynthesis, is essential for the expression of L41-Q genes.     

SMC5 and SMC6 genes are required for the segregation of repetitive chromosome regions

Structure chromosome (SMC) proteins organize the core of cohesin, condensin and Smc5-Smc6 complexes. The Smc5-Smc6 complex is required for DNA repair, as well as having another essential but enigmatic function. Here, we generated conditional mutants of SMC5 and SMC6 in budding yeast, in which the essential function was affected. We show that mutant smc5-6 and smc6-9 cells undergo an aberrant mitosis in which chromosome segregation of repetitive regions is impaired; this leads to DNA damage and RAD9-dependent activation of the Rad53 protein kinase. Consistent with a requirement for the segregation of repetitive regions, Smc5 and Smc6 proteins are enriched at ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and at some telomeres. We show that, following Smc5-Smc6 inactivation, metaphase-arrested cells show increased levels of X-shaped DNA (Holliday junctions) at the rDNA locus. Furthermore, deletion of RAD52 partially suppresses the temperature sensitivity of smc5-6 and smc6-9 mutants. We also present evidence showing that the rDNA segregation defects of smc5/smc6 mutants are mechanistically different from those previously observed for condensin mutants. These results point towards a role for the Smc5-Smc6 complex in preventing the formation of sister chromatid junctions, thereby ensuring the correct partitioning of chromosomes during anaphase.     

SOS induction in a subpopulation of structural maintenance of chromosome (Smc) mutant cells in Bacillus subtilis

The structural maintenance of chromosome (Smc) protein is highly conserved and involved in chromosome compaction, cohesion, and other DNA-related processes. In Bacillus subtilis, smc null mutations cause defects in DNA supercoiling, chromosome compaction, and chromosome partitioning. We investigated the effects of smc mutations on global gene expression in B. subtilis using DNA microarrays. We found that an smc null mutation caused partial induction of the SOS response, including induction of the defective prophage PBSX. Analysis of SOS and phage gene expression in single cells indicated that approximately 1% of smc mutants have fully induced SOS and PBSX gene expression while the other 99% of cells appear to have little or no expression. We found that induction of PBSX was not responsible for the chromosome partitioning or compaction defects of smc mutants. Similar inductions of the SOS response and PBSX were observed in cells depleted of topoisomerase I, an enzyme that relaxes negatively supercoiled DNA.     

Expression of cohesin and condensin genes during zebrafish development supports a non-proliferative role for cohesin

Cohesin and condensin are similar, but distinct multi-subunit protein complexes that have well-described roles in sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation, respectively. Recently it has emerged that cohesin, and proteins that regulate cohesin function have additional developmental roles. To further understand the role of cohesin in development, we analyzed the expression of genes encoding cohesin and condensin subunits in developing zebrafish embryos and juvenile brain. We found that cohesin subunits are expressed in a pattern that is similar (but not quite identical) to the expression of condensin subunits. Cohesin genes smc1a, rad21, pds5b and smc3 were expressed in the forebrain ventricular zone, the tectum, the mid-hindbrain boundary, the fourth ventricle, branchial arches, the otic vesicle, the eye and faintly in the developing pectoral fins. Condensin genes smc2 and smc4 were expressed in the forebrain ventricular zone, the tectum, the mid-hindbrain boundary, the fourth ventricle, branchial arches, eye and pectoral fins. Condensin genes were additionally expressed in the hindbrain proliferative zone, an area in which cohesin genes were not detected. A comparison with pcna expression and BrdU incorporation revealed that the expression of cohesins and condensins closely overlap with zones of proliferation. Interestingly, cohesin genes were expressed in non-proliferating cells flanking rhombomere boundaries in the developing brain. In mature brain and eye, cohesin was expressed in both proliferating cells and in broad zones of post-mitotic cells. The distribution of cohesin and condensin mRNAs supports existing evidence for a non-cell cycle role for cohesin in the developing brain.     

Rtt101‐Mms1‐Mms22 coordinates replication‐coupled sister chromatid cohesion and nucleosome assembly

Two sister chromatids must be held together by a cohesion process from their synthesis during S phase to segregation in anaphase. Despite its pivotal role in accurate chromosome segregation, how cohesion is established remains elusive. Here, we demonstrate that yeast Rtt101‐Mms1, Cul4 family E3 ubiquitin ligases are stronger dosage suppressors of loss‐of‐function eco1 mutants than PCNA. The essential cohesion reaction, Eco1‐catalyzed Smc3 acetylation is reduced in the absence of Rtt101‐Mms1. One of the adaptor subunits, Mms22, associates directly with Eco1. Point mutations (L61D/G63D) in Eco1 that abolish the interaction with Mms22 impair Smc3 acetylation. Importantly, an eco1LGpol30A251V double mutant displays additive Smc3ac reduction. Moreover, Smc3 acetylation and cohesion defects also occur in the mutants of other replication‐coupled nucleosome assembly (RCNA) factors upstream or downstream of Rtt101‐Mms1, indicating unanticipated cross talk between histone modifications and cohesin acetylation. These data suggest that fork‐associated Cul4‐Ddb1 E3s, together with PCNA, coordinate chromatin reassembly and cohesion establishment on the newly replicated sister chromatids, which are crucial for maintaining genome and chromosome stability.     

The Smc5-Smc6 complex is required to remove chromosome junctions in meiosis

Meiosis, a specialized cell division with a single cycle of DNA replication round and two consecutive rounds of nuclear segregation, allows for the exchange of genetic material between parental chromosomes and the formation of haploid gametes. The structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) proteins aid manipulation of chromosome structures inside cells. Eukaryotic SMC complexes include cohesin, condensin and the Smc5-Smc6 complex. Meiotic roles have been discovered for cohesin and condensin. However, although Smc5-Smc6 is known to be required for successful meiotic divisions, the meiotic functions of the complex are not well understood. Here we show that the Smc5-Smc6 complex localizes to specific chromosome regions during meiotic prophase I. We report that meiotic cells lacking Smc5-Smc6 undergo catastrophic meiotic divisions as a consequence of unresolved linkages between chromosomes. Surprisingly, meiotic segregation defects are not rescued by abrogation of Spo11-induced meiotic recombination, indicating that at least some chromosome linkages in smc5-smc6 mutants originate from other cellular processes. These results demonstrate that, as in mitosis, Smc5-Smc6 is required to ensure proper chromosome segregation during meiosis by preventing aberrant recombination intermediates between homologous chromosomes.     

Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation

The multisubunit protein complex cohesin is required to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during S phase and to maintain it during G2 and M phases. Cohesin is essential for mitosis, and even partial defects cause very high rates of chromosome loss. In budding yeast, cohesin associates with specific sites which are distributed along the entire length of a chromosome but are more dense in the vicinity of the centromere. Real-time imaging of individual centromeres tagged with green fluorescent protein suggests that cohesin bound to centromeres is important for bipolar attachment to microtubules. This cohesin is, however, incapable of resisting the consequent force, which leads to sister centromere splitting and chromosome stretching. Meanwhile, cohesin bound to sequences flanking the centromeres prevents sister chromatids from completely unzipping and is required to pull back together sister centromeres that have already split. Cohesin therefore has a central role in generating a dynamic tension between microtubules and sister chromatid cohesion at centromeres, which lasts until chromosome segregation is finally promoted by separin-dependent cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1p.     

An Eco1-independent sister chromatid cohesion establishment pathway in S. cerevisiae

Cohesion between sister chromatids, mediated by the chromosomal cohesin complex, is a prerequisite for their alignment on the spindle apparatus and segregation in mitosis. Budding yeast cohesin first associates with chromosomes in G1. Then, during DNA replication in S-phase, the replication fork-associated acetyltransferase Eco1 acetylates the cohesin subunit Smc3 to make cohesin’s DNA binding resistant to destabilization by the Wapl protein. Whether stabilization of cohesin molecules that happen to link sister chromatids is sufficient to build sister chromatid cohesion, or whether additional reactions are required to establish these links, is not known. In addition to Eco1, several other factors contribute to cohesion establishment, including Ctf4, Ctf18, Tof1, Csm3, Chl1 and Mrc1, but little is known about their roles. Here, we show that each of these factors facilitates cohesin acetylation. Moreover, the absence of Ctf4 and Chl1, but not of the other factors, causes a synthetic growth defect in cells lacking Eco1. Distinct from acetylation defects, sister chromatid cohesion in ctf4Δ and chl1Δ cells is not improved by removing Wapl. Unlike previously thought, we do not find evidence for a role of Ctf4 and Chl1 in Okazaki fragment processing, or of Okazaki fragment processing in sister chromatid cohesion. Thus, Ctf4 and Chl1 delineate an additional acetylation-independent pathway that might hold important clues as to the mechanism of sister chromatid cohesion establishment.