Induction of receptors for tumor necrosis factor-alpha by interferons is not a major mechanism for their synergistic cytotoxic response

We have investigated the effects of various interferons on the receptors for recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alpha (rTNF-alpha) and also their effects on rTNF-alpha-mediated cytotoxicity on human cervical carcinoma cell line ME-180. Preincubation of cells with interferon (IFN)-gamma causes a concentration- and time-dependent increase in rTNF-alpha receptor number without any change in the affinity constant of the receptors. The increase in receptor number is caused only by IFN-gamma and not by IFN-alpha or IFN-beta. Approximately 4-6 h of preincubation with IFN-gamma are required for maximum increase in rTNF-alpha binding to the cells, and this increase can be abolished by inhibitors of protein synthesis, suggesting de novo synthesis of rTNF-alpha receptors. The half-life of both uninduced and induced receptors of rTNF-alpha is approximately 2 h, indicating a rapid turnover. The binding of rTNF-alpha to the cells can also be eliminated by pretreatment of cells with trypsin. Following the removal of trypsin, binding of rTNF-alpha gradually increases, and this requires the synthesis of new proteins. The cytotoxic effect of rTNF-alpha on ME-180 cells is potentiated severalfold by the addition of either IFN-alpha, -beta, or -gamma. However, at similar concentrations, relatively higher potentiation of rTNF-alpha cytotoxicity is observed with IFN-gamma as compared to IFN-alpha and IFN-beta. The pre-exposure of cells to IFNs is as effective as co-exposure in enhancing cytotoxic effects of TNF-alpha. The induction of TNF-alpha receptors by IFNs is observed in different cell types regardless of their sensitivity to TNF-alpha, suggesting that increase in receptor number alone is not sufficient for the enhanced cytotoxic response. Because the enhancement of cytotoxic effects of TNF-alpha is observed by all IFNs but receptor induction in ME-180 cells occurs only with INF-gamma and because metabolic inhibitors which down-regulate TNF-alpha receptors also enhance cytotoxic response, we suggest that the induction of TNF-alpha receptor by IFNs is not a major mechanism of synergism between these cytokines.     

Crystal structure of Zebrafish interferons I and II reveals conservation of type I interferon structure in vertebrates

Interferons (IFNs) play a major role in orchestrating the innate immune response toward viruses in vertebrates, and their defining characteristic is their ability to induce an antiviral state in responsive cells. Interferons have been reported in a multitude of species, from bony fish to mammals. However, our current knowledge about the molecular function of fish IFNs as well as their evolutionary relationship to tetrapod IFNs is limited. Here we establish the three-dimensional (3D) structure of zebrafish IFN?1 and IFN?2 by crystallography. These high-resolution structures offer the first structural insight into fish cytokines. Tetrapods possess two types of IFNs that play an immediate antiviral role: type I IFNs (e.g., alpha interferon [IFN-α] and beta interferon [IFN-β]) and type III IFNs (lambda interferon [IFN-λ]), and each type is characterized by its specific receptor usage. Similarly, two groups of antiviral IFNs with distinct receptors exist in fish, including zebrafish. IFN?1 and IFN?2 represent group I and group II IFNs, respectively. Nevertheless, both structures reported here reveal a characteristic type I IFN architecture with a straight F helix, as opposed to the remaining class II cytokines, including IFN-λ, where helix F contains a characteristic bend. Phylogenetic trees derived from structure-guided multiple alignments confirmed that both groups of fish IFNs are evolutionarily closer to type I than to type III tetrapod IFNs. Thus, these fish IFNs belong to the type I IFN family. Our results also imply that a dual antiviral IFN system has arisen twice during vertebrate evolution.     

The EM structure of a type I interferon-receptor complex reveals a novel mechanism for cytokine signaling

Type I interferons (IFNs) have pleiotropic effects, including antiviral, antiproliferative, and immunomodulatory responses. All type I IFNs bind to a shared receptor consisting of the two transmembrane proteins ifnar1 and ifnar2. We used negative stain electron microscopy to calculate a three-dimensional reconstruction of the ternary complex formed by a triple mutant IFN α2 with the ectodomains of ifnar1 and ifnar2. We present a model of the complex obtained by placing atomic models of subunits into the density map of the complex. The complex of IFN α2 with its receptor (a class II cytokine receptor) shows structural similarities to the complexes formed by growth hormone and erythropoietin with their receptors (members of the class I cytokine receptor family). Despite different assembly mechanisms, class I and class II cytokine receptors thus appear to initiate signaling through similar arrangements of the receptors induced by the binding of their respective ligands.     

Determination of the human type I interferon receptor binding site on human interferon-alpha2 by cross saturation and an NMR-based model of the complex

Type I interferons (IFNs) are a family of homologous helical cytokines that exhibit pleiotropic effects on a wide variety of cell types, including antiviral activity and antibacterial, antiprozoal, immunomodulatory, and cell growth regulatory functions. Consequently, IFNs are the human proteins most widely used in the treatment of several kinds of cancer, hepatitis C, and multiple sclerosis. All type I IFNs bind to a cell surface receptor consisting of two subunits, IFNAR1 and IFNAR2, associating upon binding of interferon. The structure of the extracellular domain of IFNAR2 (R2-EC) was solved recently. Here we study the complex and the binding interface of IFNalpha2 with R2-EC using multidimensional NMR techniques. NMR shows that IFNalpha2 does not undergo significant structural changes upon binding to its receptor, suggesting a lock-and-key mechanism for binding. Cross saturation experiments were used to determine the receptor binding site upon IFNalpha2. The NMR data and previously published mutagenesis data were used to derive a docking model of the complex with an RMSD of 1 Angstrom, and its well-defined orientation between IFNalpha2 and R2-EC and the structural quality greatly improve upon previously suggested models. The relative ligand-receptor orientation is believed to be important for interferon signaling and possibly one of the parameters that distinguish the different IFN I subtypes. This structural information provides important insight into interferon signaling processes and may allow improvement in the development of therapeutically used IFNs and IFN-like molecules.     

The interferon system of teleost fish

Interferons (IFNs) are secreted proteins, which induce vertebrate cells into an antiviral state. In mammals, three families of IFNs (type I IFN, type II IFN and IFN-lambda) can be distinguished on the basis of gene structure, protein structure and functional properties. Type I IFNs, which include IFN-alpha and IFN-beta, are encoded by intron lacking genes and have a major role in the first line of defense against viruses. The human IFN-lambdas have similar biological properties as type I IFNs, but are encoded by intron containing genes. Type II IFN is identical to IFN-gamma, which is produced by T helper 1 cells in response to mitogens and antigens and has a key role in adaptive cell mediated immunity. IFNs, which show structural and functional properties similar to mammalian type I IFNs, have recently been cloned from Atlantic salmon, channel catfish, pufferfish, and zebrafish. Teleost fish appear to have at least two type I IFN genes. Phylogenetic sequence analysis shows that the fish type I IFNs form a group separated from the avian type I IFNs and the mammalian IFN-alpha, -beta and -lambda groups. Interestingly, the fish IFNs possess the same exon/intron structure as the IFN-lambdas, but show most sequence similarity to IFN-alpha. Recently, IFN-gamma genes have also been cloned from several fish species and shown to have the same exon/intron structure as mammalian IFN-gamma genes. The antiviral effect of mammalian type I IFN is exerted through binding to the IFN-alpha/beta-receptor, which triggers signal transduction through the JAK-STAT signal transduction pathway resulting in expression of Mx and other antiviral proteins. Putative IFN receptor genes have been identified in pufferfish. Several interferon regulatory factors and members of the JAK-STAT pathway have also been identified in various fish species. Moreover, Mx and several other interferon stimulated genes have been cloned and studied in fish. Furthermore, antiviral activity of Mx protein from Atlantic salmon and Japanese flounder has recently been demonstrated.     

Induction of genes mediating interferon-dependent extracellular trap formation during neutrophil differentiation

Interferons (IFNs) are cytokines that possess potent anti-viral and immunoregulatory activities. In contrast, their potential role(s) in anti-bacterial defense and neutrophil activation mechanisms is less well explored. By comparing gene expression patterns between immature and mature human neutrophils, we obtained evidence that intracellular proteases and other anti-bacterial proteins are produced at earlier stages of maturation, whereas the genes for receptors and signaling molecules required for the release of these effector molecules are preferentially induced during terminal differentiation. For instance, mature neutrophils strongly expressed genes that increase their responses to type I and type II IFNs. Interestingly, granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor was identified as a repressor of IFN signaling components and consequently of IFN-responsive genes. Both IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma induced strong tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1 in mature but not in immature neutrophils. Functional in vitro studies suggested that IFNs act as priming factors on mature neutrophils, allowing the formation of extracellular traps upon subsequent stimulation with complement factor 5a (C5a). In contrast, both IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma had only little capacity to prime immature cells in this system. Moreover, both IFNs did not have significant anti-proliferative effects on immature neutrophils. These data contribute to our understanding regarding changes of gene expression during neutrophil differentiation and IFN-mediated anti-bacterial defense mechanisms.     

Type I interferons and limitin: a comparison of structures, receptors, and functions

The type I interferon (IFN) family includes IFN-, IFN-β, IFN-, and IFN-τ. These molecules are clustered according to sequence homologies, use of the same cell surface receptor, and similar functions. IFN- and IFN-β have a globular structure composed of five a-helices. Their receptors, IFNAR1 and IFNAR2, belong to the class II cytokine receptor family for a-helical cytokines. Information about structure-function relationships between these and other IFNs is being provided by comparative sequence analysis, reference to a prototypic three-dimensional structure, analysis with monoclonal antibodies, construction of hybrid molecules and site directed mutagenesis. While much remains to be done, it should someday be possible to understand differences among IFNs in terms of how they interact with their corresponding receptors. Our recently identified IFN-like molecule, limitin, has weak sequence homology to IFN-, IFN-β, and IFN-ω and displays its biological functions through the same IFN-/β receptors. While limitin has antiproliferative, immunomodulatory, and antiviral effects like IFN- and IFN-β, it is unique in lacking influence on myeloid and erythroid progenitors. Further analysis of this functionally unique cytokine should be informative about complex IFN–receptor interactions. Furthermore, a human homologue or synthetic variant might be superior for clinical applications as an IFN without myelosuppressive properties.     

NLRP11 disrupts MAVS signalosome to inhibit type I interferon signaling and virus‐induced apoptosis

MAVS signalosome plays an important role in RIG‐I‐like receptor (RLR)‐induced antiviral signaling. Upon the recognition of viral RNAs, RLRs activate MAVS, which further recruits TRAF6 and other signaling proteins to initiate type I interferon (IFN) activation. MAVS signalosome also regulates virus‐induced apoptosis to limit viral replication. However, the mechanisms that control the activity of MAVS signalosome are still poorly defined. Here, we report NLRP11, a Nod‐like receptor, is induced by type I IFN and translocates to mitochondria to interact with MAVS upon viral infection. Using MAVS as a platform, NLRP11 degrades TRAF6 to attenuate the production of type I IFNs as well as virus‐induced apoptosis. Our findings reveal the regulatory role of NLRP11 in antiviral immunity by disrupting MAVS signalosome.     

Regulation of NMDA receptors by the tyrosine kinase Fyn

The phosphorylation and trafficking of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are tightly regulated by the Src family tyrosine kinase Fyn, through dynamic interactions with various scaffolding proteins in the NMDA receptor complex. Fyn acts as a point of convergence for many signaling pathways that upregulate GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors. In the following review, we focus on Fyn signaling downstream of different G-protein-coupled receptors: the dopamine D1 receptor, and receptors cognate to the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide. The net result of activation of each of these signaling pathways is upregulation of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors. The NMDA receptor is a major target of ethanol in the brain, and accumulating evidence suggests that Fyn mediates the effects of ethanol by regulating the phosphorylation of GluN2B NMDA receptor subunits. Furthermore, Fyn has been shown to regulate alcohol withdrawal and acute tolerance to ethanol through a GluN2B-dependent mechanism. In addition to its effects on NMDA receptor function, Fyn also modifies the threshold for synaptic plasticity at CA1 synapses, an effect that probably contributes to the effects of Fyn on spatial and contextual fear learning.     

Adenosine receptors and membrane microdomains

Adenosine receptors are a member of the large family of seven transmembrane spanning G protein coupled receptors. The four adenosine receptor subtypes-A(1), A(2a), A(2b), A(3)-exert their effects via the activation of one or more heterotrimeric G proteins resulting in the modulation of intracellular signaling. Numerous studies over the past decade have documented the complexity of G protein coupled receptor signaling at the level of protein-protein interactions as well as through signaling cross talk. With respect to adenosine receptors, the activation of one receptor subtype can have profound direct effects in one cell type but little or no effect in other cells. There is significant evidence that the compartmentation of subcellular signaling plays a physiological role in the fidelity of G protein coupled receptor signaling. This compartmentation is evident at the level of the plasma membrane in the form of membrane microdomains such as caveolae and lipid rafts. This review will summarize and critically assess our current understanding of the role of membrane microdomains in regulating adenosine receptor signaling.     

鱼类和哺乳类RLR介导的抗病毒免疫反应的泛素化修饰调控

RLR[retinoic acid-inducible gene Ⅰ(RIG-Ⅰ)-like Receptors]是一类表达在胞浆中的模式识别受体, 在识别细胞质中经病毒复制产生的病毒RNA后, 启动一系列信号级联反应, 以诱导机体Ⅰ型干扰素及干扰素诱导的抗病毒基因的表达, 最后达到清除机体病毒感染的目的。由于在病毒感染时机体干扰素反应必须迅速启动, 当病毒清除后干扰素反应又需要立即恢复到正常本底水平, 因此RLR激活的信号转导途径受到了严格的调控, 其中就包括由E3泛素连接酶参与的泛素化修饰调控和由去泛素化酶参与的去泛素化修饰调控。自2003年成功鉴定出鱼类干扰素基因以来, 鱼类也被发现具有保守的RLR信号转导途径诱导干扰素抗病毒免疫反应, 该信号途径同样受到泛素化修饰的调控。文章总结了近年来泛素化修饰在哺乳类和鱼类RLR介导的抗病毒免疫应答通路中的调节机制。     

Differential affinities of visual arrestin, beta arrestin1, and beta arrestin2 for G protein-coupled receptors delineate two major classes of receptors

Visual arrestin, betaarrestin1, and betaarrestin2 comprise a family of intracellular proteins that desensitize G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In addition, betaarrestin1 and betaarrestin2 target desensitized receptors to clathrin-coated pits for endocytosis. Whether arrestins differ in their ability to interact with GPCRs in cells is not known. In this study, we visualize the interaction of arrestin family members with GPCRs in real time and in live cells using green fluorescent protein-tagged arrestins. In the absence of agonist, visual arrestin and betaarrestin1 were found in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of HEK-293 cells, whereas betaarrestin2 was found only in the cytoplasm. Analysis of agonist-mediated arrestin translocation to multiple GPCRs identified two major classes of receptors. Class A receptors (beta2 adrenergic receptor, mu opioid receptor, endothelin type A receptor, dopamine D1A receptor, and alpha1b adrenergic receptor) bound betaarrestin2 with higher affinity than betaarrestin1 and did not interact with visual arrestin. In contrast, class B receptors (angiotensin II type 1A receptor, neurotensin receptor 1, vasopressin V2 receptor, thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor, and substance P receptor) bound both betaarrestin isoforms with similar high affinities and also interacted with visual arrestin. Switching the carboxyl-terminal tails of class A and class B receptors completely reversed the affinity of each receptor for the visual and non-visual arrestins. In addition, exchanging the betaarrestin1 and betaarrestin2 carboxyl termini reversed their extent of binding to class A receptors as well as their subcellular distribution. These results reveal for the first time marked differences in the ability of arrestin family members to bind GPCRs at the plasma membrane. Moreover, they show that visual arrestin can interact in cells with GPCRs other than rhodopsin. These findings suggest that GPCR signaling may be differentially regulated depending on the cellular complement of arrestin isoforms and the ability of arrestins to interact with other cellular proteins.     

Cell surface receptors for molecular chaperones

Heat shock proteins are intracellular molecular chaperones. However, extracellular heat shock proteins have recently been shown to mediate a range of powerful effects in inflammatory cells, neuronal cells and immune cells. These effects are transmitted by a number of cell surface receptors including LRP/CD91, CD40, Toll-like receptors, Scavenger receptors and c-type Lectins. However, although extracellular heat shock proteins are products of at least five different gene superfamilies, similar receptor types often trigger their effects. We have assessed heat shock protein binding to the different receptor types with particular regard to its role in tumor immunology. Heat shock protein 70 released from dying tumor cells or injected as part of a vaccine induces a remarkable range of immune effects. This molecular chaperone induces powerful pro-inflammatory signaling cascades leading to the activation of antigen presenting cells. In addition, heat shock protein 70 is able to transport antigenic peptides as cargo from the tumor cell cytoplasm across the membranes of antigen presenting cells and deliver them to major histocompatability class I molecules, a process known as "cross-presentation". The resulting major histocompatability class I-peptide complexes are then displayed on the cell surface by antigen presenting cells, leading to activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and tumor cell killing. Understanding how heat shock protein-receptor binding orchestrates individual components of tumor immunity will permit enhanced design of molecular chaperone based immunotherapy.     

Structural linkage between ligand discrimination and receptor activation by type I interferons

Type I Interferons (IFNs) are important cytokines for innate immunity against viruses and cancer. Sixteen human type I IFN variants signal through the same cell-surface receptors, IFNAR1 and IFNAR2, yet they can evoke markedly different physiological effects. The crystal structures of two human type I IFN ternary signaling complexes containing IFNα2 and IFNω reveal recognition modes and heterotrimeric architectures that are unique among the cytokine receptor superfamily but conserved between different type I IFNs. Receptor-ligand cross-reactivity is enabled by conserved receptor-ligand "anchor points" interspersed among ligand-specific interactions that "tune" the relative IFN-binding affinities, in an apparent extracellular "ligand proofreading" mechanism that modulates biological activity. Functional differences between IFNs are linked to their respective receptor recognition chemistries, in concert with a ligand-induced conformational change in IFNAR1, that collectively control signal initiation and complex stability, ultimately regulating differential STAT phosphorylation profiles, receptor internalization rates, and downstream gene expression patterns.     

Signal transduction by the chemokine receptor CXCR5: structural requirements for G protein activation analyzed by chimeric CXCR1/CXCR5 molecules.

The human chemokine receptors CXCR5 and CXCR1 activate signaling pathways via pertussis toxin-sensitive as well as insensitive G proteins. CXCR5 induces Ca2+ signaling and chemotaxis independently of inhibitory G proteins, whereas the same signaling pathways are entirely dependent on inhibitory G proteins for CXCR1. In contrast, activation of the MAP kinase cascade via ERK1/2 is a pertussis toxin-sensitive signaling event for both receptors. Using chimeric CXCR1/CXCR5 receptors we investigated structural requirements for the activation of signal transduction pathways by CXCR5. Individual or multiple intracellular domains of CXCR1 were exchanged for the corresponding sequences of CXCR5, leading to receptors resembling CXCR5 at the cytoplasmic surface to a varying extent. Replacing the second intracellular domain of CXCR1 had a major influence on signaling mediated by inhibitory G proteins, whereas the exchange of the third or carboxy-terminal intracellular domain had only minor effects on signal transduction. Activation of the MAP kinase cascade via ERK1/2 and chemotaxis are largely reduced in chimeras comprising the second intracellular domain of CXCR5, although coupling to inhibitory G proteins is retained in all chimeric receptors. In summary, these data characterize the contribution of the intracellular domains of CXCR5 to receptor signaling, thereby disclosing unique structural requirements that modulate G protein coupling by the receptor.     

Herpes simplex virus 1 gene products occlude the interferon signaling pathway at multiple sites

Earlier studies have shown that herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) blocks the interferon response pathways, at least at two sites, by circumventing the effects of activation of protein kinase R by double-stranded RNA and interferon and through the degradation of promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) since interferon has no antiviral effects in PML(-/-) cells. Here we report on two effects of viral genes on other sites of the interferon signaling pathway. (i) In infected cells, Jak1 kinase associated with interferon receptors and Stat2 associated with the interferon signaling pathway rapidly disappear from infected cells. The level of interferon alpha receptor is also reduced, albeit less drastically at times after 4 h postinfection. Other members of the Stat family of proteins were either decreased in amount or posttranslationally processed in a manner different from those of mock-infected cells. The decrease in the levels of Jak1 and Stat2 may account for the decrease in the formation of complexes consisting of Stat1 or ISGF3 and DNA sequences containing the interferon-stimulated response elements after exposure to interferon. (ii) The disappearance of Jak1 and Stat2 was related at least in part to the function of the virion host shutoff protein, the product of the viral U(L)41 gene. Consistent with this observation, a mutant lacking the U(L)41 gene and treated with interferon produced lesser amounts of a late protein (U(L)38) than the wild-type parent. We conclude that HSV-1 blocks the interferon signaling pathways at several sites.