Identification of a human chromosome-specific interstitial telomere-like sequence (ITS) at 22q11.2 using double-strand PRINS

Interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs), telomere-like repeats at intrachromosomal sites, are common in mammals and consist of tandem repeats of the canonical telomeric repeat, TTAGGG, or a repeat similar to this. We report that the ITS in human chromosome region 22q11.2 is, in the sequenced genome database, 101 tandem repeats of the sequence TTAGGGAGG. Using the primed in situ labeling (PRINS) technique and primers against the canonical telomeric repeat (TTAGGG), we illuminated telomeric sites for all chromosomes and an ITS locus at 22q11.2. Using the TTAGGGAGG sequence, we designed PRINS primers that efficiently and specifically illuminate the 22q11.2 ITS locus without illuminating telomeric and other ITS loci. The 22q11.2 locus has more repeat units than other ITSs loci enabling an unprecedented high detection frequency for this interstitial telomere locus. The 22q11.2 is associated with hot spots for disease-related chromosome breaks for multiple disorders, such as DiGeorge syndrome and chronic myeloid leukemia. We describe our findings that the ITS at 22q11.2 is in the same area of, and proximal to the common rearrangement region of multiple disorders. We suggest that the ITS might be involved in DNA repair processes in this area to protect the chromosome from more serious damage.     

Conservation and characterization of unique porcine interstitial telomeric sequences

Telomeres are composed of TTAGGG repeats and located at the ends of chromosomes. Telomeres protect chromosomes from instability in mammals, including mice and humans. Repetitive TTAGGG sequences are also found at intrachromosomal sites, where they are named as interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs). Aberrant ITSs are implicated in chromosomal instability and found in cancer cells. Interestingly, in pigs, vertebrate telomere sequences TTAGGG (vITSs) are also localized at the centromeric region of chromosome 6, in addition to the end of all chromosomes. Surprisingly, we found that botanic telomere sequences, TTTAGGG (bITSs), also localize with vITSs at the centromeric regions of pig chromosome 6 using telomere fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and by comparisons between several species. Furthermore, the average lengths of vITSs are highly correlated with those of the terminal telomeres (TTS). Also, pig ITSs show a high incidence of telomere doublets, suggesting that pig ITSs might be unstable and dynamic. Together, our results show that pig cells maintain the conserved telomere sequences that are found at the ITSs from of plants and other vertebrates. Further understanding of the function and regulation of pig ITSs may provide new clues for evolution and chromosomal instability.     

Interstitial telomeric repeats are not preferentially involved in radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in human cells

Telomeric repeat sequences, located at the end of eukaryotic chromosomes, have been detected at intrachromosomal locations in many species. Large blocks of telomeric sequences are located near the centromeres in hamster cells, and have been reported to break spontaneously or after exposure to ionizing radiation, leading to chromosome aberrations. In human cells, interstitial telomeric sequences (ITS) can be composed of short tracts of telomeric repeats (less than twenty), or of longer stretches of exact and degenerated hexanucleotides, mainly localized at subtelomeres. In this paper, we analyzed the radiation sensitivity of a naturally occurring short ITS localized in 2q31 and we found that this region is not a hot spot of radiation-induced chromosome breaks. We then selected a human cell line in which approximately 800 bp of telomeric DNA had been introduced by transfection into an internal euchromatic chromosomal region in chromosome 4q. In parallel, a cell line containing the plasmid without telomeric sequences was also analyzed. Both regions containing the transfected plasmids showed a higher frequency of radiation-induced breaks than expected, indicating that the instability of the regions containing the transfected sequences is not due to the presence of telomeric sequences. Taken together, our data show that ITS themselves do not enhance the formation of radiation-induced chromosome rearrangements in these human cell lines.     

Do time, heterochromatin, NORs, or chromosomal rearrangements correlate with distribution of interstitial telomeric repeats in Sigmodon (cotton rats)?

We studied the chromosomal distribution of telomere repeats (TTAGGG)(n) in 8 species of Sigmodon (cotton rats) using chromosome paints fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) from Sigmodon hispidus. In 2 species with the proposed primitive karyotype for the genus, telomere repeats were restricted to telomeric sites. But in the other 6 species that include 3 with proposed primitive karyotypes and 3 with highly rearranged karyotypes, telomere repeats were found on both telomeric sites and within interstitial telomeric sites (ITSs). To explain the distribution of ITS in Sigmodon, we gather data from C-bands, silver nitrate staining, G-bands, and chromosomal paint data from previous published studies. We did find some correlation with ITS and heterochromatin, euchromatic chromosomal rearrangements, and nucleolar organizing regions. No one type of chromosomal structure explains all ITS in Sigmodon. Multiple explanations and mechanisms for movement of intragenomic sequences are required to explain ITS in this genus. We rejected the hypothesis that age of a lineage correlates with the presence of ITS using divergence time estimate analyses. This multigene phylogeny places species with ITS (S. arizonae, S. fulviventer, S. hispidus, S. mascotensis, S. ochrognathus, and S. toltecus) in the clade with a species without ITS (S. hirsutus). Lineages with ITS (S. arizonae and S. mascotensis) arose independently from a lineage absent of ITS (S. hirsutus) around 0.67 to 0.83 Ma. The rearranged karyotypes of S. mascotensis and S. arizonae appear to be an independently derived autapomorphic characters, supporting a fast rate of chromosomal changes that vary among species.     

Contribution of telomerase RNA retrotranscription to DNA double-strand break repair during mammalian genome evolution

Background  

In vertebrates, tandem arrays of TTAGGG hexamers are present at both telomeres and intrachromosomal sites (interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs)). We previously showed that, in primates, ITSs were inserted during the repair of DNA double-strand breaks and proposed that they could arise from either the capture of telomeric fragments or the action of telomerase.     

Chromosomal distribution of interstitial telomeric sequences in nine neotropical primates (Platyrrhini): possible implications in evolution and phylogeny

To localize interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs) and to test whether their pattern of distribution could be linked to chromosomal evolution, we hybridized telomeric sequence probes (peptide nucleic acid, PNA) on metaphases of New World monkeys: Callithrix argentata, Callithrix jacchus, Cebuella pygmaea, Saguinus oedipus, Saimiri sciureus, Aotus lemurinus griseimembra, Aotus nancymaae (Cebidae), Lagothrix lagotricha (Atelidae) and Callicebus moloch (Pithecidae), characterized by a rapid radiation and a high rate of chromosomal rearrangements. Our analysis of the probe signal localization allowed us to show in all the species analysed, as normally, the telomeric location at the terminal ends of chromosomes and unexpected signal distributions in some species. Indeed, in three species among the nine studied, Aotus lemurinus griseimembra, Aotus nancymaae (Cebidae) and Lagothrix lagotricha (Atelidae), we showed a high variability in terms of localization and degree of amplification of interstitial telomeric sequences, especially for the ones found at centromeric or pericentromeric positions (het‐ITS). A comparative analysis, between species, of homologous chromosomes to human syntenies, on which we have found positive interspersed PNA signals, allowed us to explain the observed pattern of ITS distribution as results of chromosomal rearrangements in the neotropical primates analysed. This evidence permitted us to discuss the possible implication of ITSs as phylogenetic markers for closely related species. Moreover, reviewing previous literature data of ITSs distribution in Primates and in the light of our results, we suggest an underestimation of ITSs and highlight the importance of the molecular cytogenetics approach in characterizing ITSs, which role is still not clarified.     

Different DNA-PKcs functions in the repair of radiation-induced and spontaneous DSBs within interstitial telomeric sequences

Interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs) in hamster cells are hot spots for spontaneous and induced chromosome aberrations (CAs). Most data on ITS instability to date have been obtained in DNA repair-proficient cells. The classical non-homologous end joining repair pathway (C-NHEJ), which is the principal double strand break (DSB) repair mechanism in mammalian cells, is thought to restore the morphologically correct chromosome structure. The production of CAs thus involves DNA-PKcs-independent repair pathways. In our current study, we investigated the participation of DNA-PKcs from the C-NHEJ pathway in the repair of spontaneous or radiation-induced DSBs in ITSs using wild-type and DNA-PKcs mutant Chinese hamster ovary cells. Our data demonstrate that DNA-PKcs stabilizes spontaneous DSBs within ITSs from the chromosome 9 long arm, leading to the formation of terminal deletions. In addition, we show that DNA-PKcs-dependent C-NHEJ is employed following radiation-induced DSBs in other ITSs and restores morphologically correct chromosomes, whereas DNA-PKcs independent mechanisms co-exist in DNA-PKcs proficient cells leading to an excess of CAs within ITSs.     

Chromatin Organization and Remodeling of Interstitial Telomeric Sites During Meiosis in the Mongolian Gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus)

Telomeric DNA repeats are key features of chromosomes that allow the maintenance of integrity and stability in the telomeres. However, interstitial telomere sites (ITSs) can also be found along the chromosomes, especially near the centromere, where they may appear following chromosomal rearrangements like Robertsonian translocations. There is no defined role for ITSs, but they are linked to DNA damage-prone sites. We were interested in studying the structural organization of ITSs during meiosis, a kind of cell division in which programmed DNA damage events and noticeable chromatin reorganizations occur. Here we describe the presence of highly amplified ITSs in the pericentromeric region of Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) chromosomes. During meiosis, ITSs show a different chromatin conformation than DNA repeats at telomeres, appearing more extended and accumulating heterochromatin markers. Interestingly, ITSs also recruit the telomeric proteins RAP1 and TRF1, but in a stage-dependent manner, appearing mainly at late prophase I stages. We did not find a specific accumulation of DNA repair factors to the ITSs, such as γH2AX or RAD51 at these stages, but we could detect the presence of MLH1, a marker for reciprocal recombination. However, contrary to previous reports, we did not find a specific accumulation of crossovers at ITSs. Intriguingly, some centromeric regions of metacentric chromosomes may bind the nuclear envelope through the association to SUN1 protein, a feature usually performed by telomeres. Therefore, ITSs present a particular and dynamic chromatin configuration in meiosis, which could be involved in maintaining their genetic stability, but they additionally retain some features of distal telomeres, provided by their capability to associate to telomere-binding proteins.     

Extent and variability of interstitial telomeric sequences and their effects on estimates of telomere length

Telomeres often shorten with time, although this varies between tissues, individuals and species, and their length and/or rate of change may reflect fitness and rate of senescence. Measurement of telomeres is increasingly important to ecologists, yet the relative merits of different methods for estimating telomere length are not clear. In particular the extent to which interstitial telomere sequences (ITSs), telomere repeats located away from chromosomes ends, confound estimates of telomere length is unknown. Here we present a method to estimate the extent of ITS within a species and variation among individuals. We estimated the extent of ITS by comparing the amount of label hybridized to in‐gel telomere restriction fragments (TRF) before and after the TRFs were denatured. This protocol produced robust and repeatable estimates of the extent of ITS in birds. In five species, the amount of ITS was substantial, ranging from 15% to 40% of total telomeric sequence DNA. In addition, the amount of ITS can vary significantly among individuals within a species. Including ITSs in telomere length calculations always underestimated telomere length because most ITSs are shorter than most telomeres. The magnitude of that error varies with telomere length and is larger for longer telomeres. Estimating telomere length using methods that incorporate ITSs, such as Southern blot TRF and quantitative PCR analyses reduces an investigator's power to detect difference in telomere dynamics between individuals or over time within an individual.     

The influence of interstitial telomeric sequences on chromosome instability in human cells

Although most telomere repeat sequences are found at the ends of chromosomes, some telomeric repeat sequences are also found at intrachromosomal locations in mammalian cells. Several studies have found that these interstitial telomeric repeat sequences can promote chromosome instability in rodent cells, either spontaneously or following ionizing radiation. In the present study we describe the extensive cytogenetic analysis of three different human cell lines with plasmids containing telomeric repeat sequences integrated at interstitial sites. In two of these cell lines, Q18 and P8SX, instability has been detected in the chromosome containing the integrated plasmid, involving breakage/fusion/bridge cycles or amplification of the plasmid DNA, respectively. However, the data suggest that the instability observed is characteristic of the general instability in these cell lines and that the telomeric repeat sequences themselves are not responsible. Consistent with this interpretation, the chromosome containing an integrated plasmid with 500 bp of telomeric repeat sequences is highly stable in the third cell line, SNG28, which has a relatively stable genome. The stability of the chromosome containing the integrated plasmid sequences in SNG28 makes this an excellent cell line to study the effect of ionizing radiation on the stability of interstitial telomeric sequences in human cells.     

Bleomycin induces delayed instability of interstitial telomeric sequences in Chinese hamster ovary cells

We analyzed the behavior of interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs) in the progeny of Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells exposed to the radiomimetic compound bleomycin (BLM) in order to determine if ITSs play some role in the long-term clastogenic effect of this antibiotic. To this end, CHO cells were treated with a single concentration of BLM (2.5μg/ml), and the frequency of unstable chromosomal aberrations was determined at several times after treatment (18h, and 6, 15 and 34/36 days) by using PNA-FISH with a pan-telomeric probe [(TTAGGG)n repeats]. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a higher frequency of aberrations at 18h and 6 days after treatment in BLM-exposed cultures vs. untreated cultures, although the yield of BLM-induced aberrations decreased on average five times 6 days after treatment compared with the one induced 18h after treatment. Moreover, no significant differences in the frequency of aberrations were observed between untreated and BLM-exposed cells at 15 or 34/36 days after treatment. These data indicate that, in terms of unstable aberrations, the in vitro clastogenic effect of BLM on CHO cells persists for at least 6 days but less than 15 days after exposure. In addition, we found that BLM induces ITSs instability, cytogenetically detectable as acentric fragments (18h after treatment) or additional (new) FISH signals (6 days after treatment). We propose that the delayed effect of BLM on ITSs mainly results from breakage of heterochromatic ITSs blocks and further insertion of these sequences at the sites of monochromatid breaks occurring at G2 phase of the cell cycle, since most of the additional FISH signals were present as single dots and located at interstitial sites of the involved chromosomes.     

On the chromatin structure of eukaryotic telomeres

Telomeres prevent chromosome fusions and degradation by exonucleases and are implicated in DNA repair, homologous recombination, chromosome pairing and segregation. All these functions of telomeres require the integrity of their chromatin structure, which has been traditionally considered as heterochromatic. In agreement with this idea, different studies have reported that telomeres associate with heterochromatic marks. However, these studies addressed simultaneously the chromatin structures of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or the chromatin structure of telomeres and Interstitial Telomeric Sequences (ITSs). The independent analysis of Arabidopsis telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs has allowed the discovery of euchromatic telomeres. In Arabidopsis, whereas subtelomeric regions and ITSs associate with heterochromatic marks, telomeres exhibit euchromatic features. We think that this scenario could be found in other model systems if the chromatin organizations of telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs are independently analyzed.Key words: telomeres, subtelomeres, euchromatin, heterochromatin, ChIP, immunolocalizationTelomeric DNA usually contains tandem repeats of a short GC rich motif. The number of repeats and, therefore, the length of telomeres is subject to regulation and influences relevant biological processes like aging and cancer.^1–3 In situ hybridization studies have revealed that telomeric repeats are also present at interstitial chromosomal loci.^4,5 An analysis of the genome sequence from different eukaryotes indicates that ITSs have a widespread distribution in different model systems including zebrafish, chicken, opossum, mouse, dog, cattle, horse, human, rice, poplar or Arabidopsis (see Fig. 1 for an example; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview). These ITSs have been related to chromosomal aberrations, fragile sites, hot spots for recombination and diseases caused by genomic instability, although their functions remain unknown.⁶Open in a separate windowFigure 1Distribution of the main telomeric repeat arrays in the genome of several model organisms. These representations have been performed by using the megaBLAST program and the all assemblies genomic databases at NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview). Searches for homology with 100 tandem telomeric repeats were done using the default parameters except that the expected threshold was set to 10 and the filters were turned off. Chromosomes are represented as vertical bars and numbered at the bottom. The horizontal bars represent the telomeric repeat arrays. Colors indicate the BLAST scores (red ≥200; pink 80–200; green 50–80).Telomeres and ITSs have probably cross talk through evolution. In some instances, ITSs could have been generated by telomeric fusions. Pioneering studies performed by Hermann J. Muller in Drosophila and Barbara McClintock in maize showed that newly formed chromosome ends tend to fuse giving rise to the so-called breakage-fusion-bridge cycle.^7,8 This cycle can lead to stable chromosomal reorganizations after healing of the broken ends. In addition, Muller and McClintock found that, unlike these newly formed broken chromosome ends, natural chromosomal ends are quite stable and do not tend to fuse.⁹ It is currently known that telomere dysfunction due to mutations that cause telomeric shortening or abolish the expression of certain telomeric proteins can lead to telomeric fusions, anaphase bridges and genome reorganizations.^1–3,10,11 Therefore, telomeric shortening or alterations of telomeric chromatin structure might be expected to generate ITSs through evolution by promoting telomeric fusions.¹² ITSs might also originate through the activity of telomerase during the repair process of double strand breaks or by recombination.^13–16 In addition, telomerase activity might lead to the formation of new telomeres by healing of chromosome breaks within internal telomeric repeats and even within other sequences.^17–19 This process of healing involves the acquisition of telomeric chromatin structure.DNA folds into two major chromatin organizations inside the cell nucleus: heterochromatin and euchromatin. Heterochromatin is highly condensed in interphase nuclei and is usually associated with repetitive and silent DNA. By contrast, euchromatin has an open conformation and is often related to the capacity to be transcribed. Both kinds of chromatin exhibit defined epigenetic modifications that influence their biochemical behavior. Thus, the study of these epigenetic marks is an issue of major interest.The chromatin structures of telomeres and ITSs might be different. Therefore, they should be studied independently. Chromatin structure analyses are usually performed by immunocytolocalization or by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP).^20–23 Special care should be taken when the epigenetic status of telomeres is analyzed by immunocytolocalization. This technique does not allow differentiating between telomeres and subtelomeric regions. Since subtelomeric regions are known to be heterochromatic in many eukaryotic organisms, heterochromatic marks should be immunolocalized at the chromosome ends of these organisms. However, these marks could correspond to subtelomeric regions and not to telomeres.The ChIP technique implies the immunoprecipitation of chromatin with specific antibodies and the further analysis of the immunoprecipitated DNA. DNA sequences immunoprecipitated by a specific antibody are thought to associate in vivo with the feature recognized by this antibody. Whereas the enrichment of single copy sequences in the immunoprecipitated DNA has been usually analyzed by quantitative PCR, the analyses of repetitive DNA sequences have been often performed by hybridization. Thus, multiple telomeric chromatin structure analyses have been performed by hybridizing immunoprecipitated DNA with a telomeric probe. However, these analyses displayed simultaneously the chromatin structures of telomeres and ITSs. High throughput sequencing analyses of the immunoprecipitated DNA might help overcome this problem. Nevertheless, since the reads obtained with these techniques at present are short, it is still difficult to ascertain whether the enrichment of immunoprecipitated telomeric sequences corresponds to telomeres or to ITSs. Third-generation long-read accurate technologies and new algorithms that discriminate between telomeres and ITSs should solve the problem.In principle, the combination of immunocytolocalization and ChIP experiments should help to differentiate between telomeres and ITSs. However, since subtelomeric regions are known to influence telomere function and contain degenerated ITSs, at least in some organisms like humans or Arabidopsis, this may not be necessarily true.⁶ A specific epigenetic mark might be required for telomere function, found associated with telomeric repeats by ChIP and with the end of chromosomes by immunocytolocalization and still not associate with true telomeres but with subtelomeric regions and ITSs or just with subtelomeric ITSs.An alternative way to analyze the chromatin structure of telomeres by ChIP involves the use of frequently cutting restriction enzymes. The chromatin structures of Arabidopsis telomeres and ITSs have been independently studied by using Tru9I, a restriction enzyme that recognizes the sequence TTAA.²⁴ Since telomeres in Arabidopsis and in other model systems are composed of perfect telomeric repeat arrays, they remain uncut after digestion with Tru9I.²⁵ In contrast, Arabidopsis ITSs are frequently cut because they are composed of short arrays of perfect telomeric repeats interspersed with degenerated repeats.^25–28 Thus, when Arabidopsis genomic DNA is digested with Tru9I and hybridized with a telomeric probe, most of the signals corresponding to ITSs disappear.²⁵ The use of Tru9I has made possible to discover that Arabidopsis telomeres exhibit euchromatic features. In contrast, Arabidopsis ITSs and subtelomeric regions are heterochromatic.²⁴ In Arabidopsis, heterochromatin is characterized by cytosine methylation, which can be targeted at CpG, CpNpG or CpNpN residues (where N is any nucleotide), and by H3K9me1,2, H3K27me1,2 and H4K20me1. In turn, Arabidopsis euchromatin is characterized by H3K4me1,2,3, H3K36me1,2,3, H4K20me2,3 and by histones acetylation.²⁹ ChIP experiments processed with Tru9I have revealed that Arabidopsis telomeres have high levels of euchromatic marks (H3K4me2, H3K9 and H4K16 acetylation) and low levels of heterochromatic marks (H3K9me2, H3K27me1 and DNA methylation).²⁴ Therefore, Arabidopsis telomeres exhibit epigenetic modifications characteristic of euchromatin.Different studies in mice, humans or Arabidopsis have reported that telomeres are heterochromatic based on the existence of siRNAs containing telomeric sequences, on the association of telomeric sequences with telomeric and with heterochromatin proteins, on the methylation of telomeric sequences or on the histones modifications associated with telomeric sequences.^30–34 However, the experiments presented in those studies addressed simultaneously the chromatin organizations of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or of telomeres and ITSs. Telomeres have also been reported to be heterochromatic based on the existence of the so-called TElomeric Repeat containing RNAs (TERRA), which are present in different eukaryotes.³⁵ At telomeric regions, TERRA are transcribed from subtelomeric promoters towards chromosome ends. Since human subtelomeric TERRA are mostly composed of subtelomeric sequences, with only about 200 bp of telomeric sequences at their 3′ ends, they might be related to subtelomeric heterochromatin formation rather than to the formation of telomeric chromatin. Nevertheless, TERRA interact with human telomeric proteins and influence telomere function. In addition, TERRA might also be related to ITSs heterochromatinization.^34,35We believe that the scenario found in Arabidopsis could also be found in other model systems if the chromatin structures of telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs are independently analyzed. Several reports have described the presence of histone H3.3 at mice telomeres.^36–39 Since this histone variant has been previously associated with active chromatin, these studies are compatible with a euchromatic organization of telomeres. However, again in these reports, the experiments shown addressed simultaneously the chromatin organization of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or of telomeres and ITSs. In general terms, we believe that a clear distinction between telomeres and ITSs should be established when future ChIP experiments are analyzed. The use of third generation high throughput sequencing technologies or of frequently cutting restriction enzymes might help in this task.As mentioned above, the epigenetic modifications associated with telomeric regions are known to be important for telomere function. These modifications are required to provide genome stability.³³ In this context, it will be relevant to ascertain how the function of Arabidopsis telomeres is influenced by their euchromatic marks and by the presence of heterochromatin at subtelomeric regions.     

Human intrachromosomal telomeric-like repeats: sequence organization and mechanisms of origin

The intrachromosomal location of (T2AG3)n telomeric sequences has been reported in several species. It was proposed that interstitial telomeres (ITs) originated through telomeric fusion of ancestral chromosomes. However, the data so far obtained derive mainly from cytogenetic observations. Cloning and database searching of human IT sequences allowed us to identify three classes: (i) short ITs, composed of few, essentially exact T2AG3 units; (ii) subtelomeric ITs, composed of larger arrays (several hundred base pairs) including many degenerate units within subtelomeric domains; (iii) fusion ITs, in which two extended stretches of telomeric repeats are oriented head-to-head. The number of short ITs is over 50 and subtelomeric ITs are probably present at all chromosomal ends. Surprisingly, the telomeric sequence in 2q13 remains the only fusion IT so far characterized, and evidence presented here suggests that another member of this class may be present in 1q41. Different molecular mechanisms generated the three classes. In particular, several short ITs interrupt precisely repetitive elements or are flanked by direct repeats of 10-41 bp, and are conserved in gorilla and chimpanzee. These features strongly suggest that telomeric repeats were inserted at intrachromosomal sites through the repair of double-strand breaks that occurred in the germline during evolution.     

Centromeric and telomeric repeats are stable in nonagenarians as revealed by the double hybridization fluorescent in situ technique

We report a simple method for simultaneous identification of centromeric and telomeric repeat sequences of human chromosomes. Employing this technique, we investigated the stability of centromeres and telomeres in individuals over 90 years of age and compared them with younger controls (<40 years). Our findings suggest that centromeric and telomeric repeats remain apparently stable in nonagenarians. These findings are enigmatic because it has been suggested that centromeres are lost in older individuals. Furthermore, telomeric shortening has been observed in aged lymphocytes and cellular senescence. However, stability of telomeric repeats noted in nonagenarians may be masked by loss followed by compensation by a process called telomeric elongation.     

Evolutionary breakpoints are co-localized with fragile sites and intrachromosomal telomeric sequences in primates

The concentration of evolutionary breakpoints in primate karyotypes in some particular regions or chromosome bands suggests that these chromosome regions are more prone to breakage. This is the first extensive comparative study which investigates a possible relationship of two genetic markers (intrachromosomal telomeric sequences [TTAGGG]n, [ITSs] and fragile sites [FSs]), which are implicated in the evolutionary process as well as in chromosome rearrangements. For this purpose, we have analyzed: (a) the cytogenetic expression of aphidicolin-induced FSs in Cebus apella and Cebus nigrivittatus (F. Cebidae, Platyrrhini) and Mandrillus sphinx (F. Cercopithecidae, Catarrhini), and (b) the intrachromosomal position of telomeric-like sequences by FISH with a synthetic (TTAGGG)n probe in C. apella chromosomes. The multinomial FSM statistical model allowed us to determinate 53 FSs in C. apella, 16 FSs in C. nigrivittatus and 50 FSs in M. sphinx. As expected, all telomeres hybridized with the probe, and 55 intrachromosomal loci were also detected in the Cebus apella karyotype. The chi(2) test indicates that the coincidence of the location of Cebus and Mandrillus FSs with the location of human FSs is significant (P < 0.005). Based on a comparative cytogenetic study among different primate species we have identified (or described) the chromosome bands in the karyotypes of Papionini and Cebus species implicated in evolutionary reorganizations. More than 80% of these evolutionary breakpoints are located in chromosome bands that express FSs and/or contain ITSs.     

Streptonigrin induces delayed chromosomal instability involving interstitial telomeric sequences in Chinese hamster ovary cells

We analyzed the induction of chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells exposed to the radiomimetic compound streptonigrin (SN), in order to determine whether interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs) are involved in the long-term clastogenic effect of this antibiotic. CHO cells were treated with a single concentration of SN (100ng/ml), and the frequency of unstable chromosomal aberrations was determined at three times after treatment (18h, and 6 and 15 days) by using PNA-FISH with a pan-telomeric probe. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a higher frequency of aberrations at 18h and 6 days after treatment in SN-exposed cultures vs. untreated cultures. The percentage of damaged cells and the yield of SN-induced aberrations at 6 days after treatment increased on average twofold compared with the ones at 18h after treatment. Moreover, a significant decrease in the frequency of aberrations was observed in SN-exposed cells at 15 days after treatment, resulting in a frequency of aberrations significantly lower than the frequency of aberrations observed in the corresponding control cultures. These data indicate that SN induces delayed chromosomal instability in CHO cells, and that the in vitro clastogenic effect of this compound persists for at least 6 days but less than 15 days after treatment. In addition, we found that SN induces delayed ITSs instability, cytogenetically detectable as additional FISH signals and centromeric breaks involving dissociation of the telomeric signal 6 days after treatment. We propose that the delayed effect of SN on ITSs results from breakage of heterochromatic centromeric ITSs blocks and further insertion of these sequences at the sites of mono- or isochromatid breaks occurring at G2 or G1-S phases of the cell cycle, respectively, since most of the additional FISH signals were present as single or double dots, and located at interstitial sites of the involved chromosomes.     

Lack of spontaneous and radiation-induced chromosome breakage at interstitial telomeric sites in murine scid cells

Interstitial telomeric sites (ITSs) in chromosomes from DNA repair-proficient mammalian cells are sensitive to both spontaneous and radiation-induced chromosome breakage. Exact mechanisms of this chromosome breakage sensitivity are not known. To investigate factors that predispose ITSs to chromosome breakage we used murine scid cells. These cells lack functional DNA-PKcs, an enzyme involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Interestingly, our results revealed lack of both spontaneous and radiation-induced chromosome breakage at ITSs found in scid chromosomes. Therefore, it is possible that increased sensitivity of ITSs to chromosome breakage is associated with the functional DNA double-strand break repair machinery. To investigate if this is the case we used scid cells in which DNA-PKcs deficiency was corrected. Our results revealed complete disappearance of ITSs in scid cells with functional DNA-PKcs, presumably through chromosome breakage at ITSs, but their unchanged frequency in positive and negative control cells. Therefore, our results indicate that the functional DNA double-strand break machinery is required for elevated sensitivity of ITSs to chromosome breakage. Interestingly, we observed significant differences in mitotic chromosome condensation between scid cells and their counterparts with restored DNA-PKcs activity suggesting that lack of functional DNA-PKcs may cause a defect in chromatin organization. Increased condensation of mitotic chromosomes in the scid background was also confirmed in vivo. Therefore, our results indicate a previously unanticipated role of DNA-PKcs in chromatin organisation, which could contribute to the lack of ITS sensitivity to chromosome breakage in murine scid cells.     

GGGCTA repeats can fold into hairpins poorly unfolded by replication protein A: a possible origin of the length-dependent instability of GGGCTA variant repeats in human telomeres

Human telomeres are composed of GGGTTA repeats and interspersed with variant repeats. The GGGCTA variant motif was identified in the proximal regions of human telomeres about 10 years ago and was shown to display a length-dependent instability. In parallel, a structural study showed that four GGGCTA repeats folded into a non-canonical G-quadruplex (G4) comprising a Watson–Crick GCGC tetrad. It was proposed that this non-canonical G4 might be an additional obstacle for telomere replication. In the present study, we demonstrate that longer GGGCTA arrays fold into G4 and into hairpins. We also demonstrate that replication protein A (RPA) efficiently binds to GGGCTA repeats structured into G4 but poorly binds to GGGCTA repeats structured into hairpins. Our results (along with results obtained with a more stable variant motif) suggest that GGGCTA hairpins are at the origin of GGGCTA length-dependent instability. They also suggest, as working hypothesis, that failure of efficient binding of RPA to GGGCTA structured into hairpins might be involved in the mechanism of GGGCTA array instability. On the basis of our present and past studies about telomeric G4 and their interaction with RPA, we propose an original point of view about telomeric G4 and the evolution of telomeric motifs.     

Analysis of the epigenetic status of telomeres by using ChIP-seq data

The chromatin structure of eukaryotic telomeres plays an essential role in telomere functions. However, their study might be impaired by the presence of interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs), which have a widespread distribution in different model systems. We have developed a simple approach to study the chromatin structure of Arabidopsis telomeres independently of ITSs by analyzing ChIP-seq data. This approach could be used to study the chromatin structure of telomeres in some other eukaryotes. The analysis of ChIP-seq experiments revealed that Arabidopsis telomeres have higher density of histone H3 than centromeres, which might reflects their short nucleosomal organization. These experiments also revealed that Arabidopsis telomeres have lower levels of heterochromatic marks than centromeres (H3K9^Me2 and H3K27^Me), higher levels of some euchromatic marks (H3K4^Me2 and H3K9Ac) and similar or lower levels of other euchromatic marks (H3K4^Me3, H3K36^Me2, H3K36^Me3 and H3K18Ac). Interestingly, the ChIP-seq experiments also revealed that Arabidopsis telomeres exhibit high levels of H3K27^Me3, a repressive mark that associates with many euchromatic genes. The epigenetic profile of Arabidopsis telomeres is closely related to the previously defined chromatin state 2. This chromatin state is found in 23% of Arabidopsis genes, many of which are repressed or lowly expressed. At least, in part, this scenario is similar in rice.