Domains of Heterochromatin Protein 1 Required for Drosophila melanogaster Heterochromatin Spreading

Centric regions of eukaryotic genomes are packaged into heterochromatin, which possesses the ability to spread along the chromosome and silence gene expression. The process of spreading has been challenging to study at the molecular level due to repetitious sequences within centric regions. A heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) tethering system was developed that generates “ectopic heterochromatin” at sites within euchromatic regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Using this system, we show that HP1 dimerization and the PxVxL interaction platform formed by dimerization of the HP1 chromo shadow domain are necessary for spreading to a downstream reporter gene located 3.7 kb away. Surprisingly, either the HP1 chromo domain or the chromo shadow domain alone is sufficient for spreading and silencing at a downstream reporter gene located 1.9 kb away. Spreading is dependent on at least two H3K9 methyltransferases, with SU(VAR)3-9 playing a greater role at the 3.7-kb reporter and dSETDB1 predominately acting at the 1.9 kb reporter. These data support a model whereby HP1 takes part in multiple mechanisms of silencing and spreading.HETEROCHROMATIN protein 1 (HP1) was identified in Drosophila as a nonhistone chromosomal protein enriched in centric heterochromatin (James and Elgin 1986; James et al. 1989). On polytene chromosomes, HP1 localizes near centromeres and telomeres, along the fourth chromosome and at ∼200 sites within the euchromatic arms (James et al. 1989; Fanti et al. 2003). Heterochromatin has the ability to “spread,” or propagate in cis, along the chromosome (Weiler and Wakimoto 1995). Spreading is observed when a chromosomal rearrangement places a euchromatic domain next to a heterochromatic domain. Cytologically, spreading is visualized as densely compact chromatin that emanates from the chromocenter, the structure formed by the fusion of centromeres, and extends into the banded regions of polytene chromosomes (Belyaeva and Zhimulev 1991). Euchromatic genes brought into juxtaposition with heterochromatin by chromosomal rearrangements exhibit gene silencing, termed position effect variegation (PEV) (Weiler and Wakimoto 1995). Mutations in Su(var)2-5, the gene encoding HP1, suppress silencing, suggesting HP1 plays a key role in spreading (Eissenberg et al. 1990). The molecular processes of spreading are not well understood.Repetitive sequences within heterochromatin make it difficult to study spreading at the molecular level. In addition, specific repetitive elements are thought to function as initiation sites for heterochromatin formation (Sun et al. 2004; Haynes et al. 2006), making it challenging to separate initiation from spreading. To overcome these problems, we generated a system that nucleates small domains (<20 kb) of repressive chromatin that share many properties with centric heterochromatin. Here we refer to these as ectopic heterochromatin domains. These domains are generated by expressing a fusion protein, consisting of the DNA binding domain of the Escherichia coli lac repressor (LacI) fused to HP1, in stocks possessing lac operator (lacO) repeats upstream of a reporter gene cassette (Danzer and Wallrath 2004). LacI-HP1 associates with the lacO repeats and causes silencing of the adjacent reporter genes. Silencing correlates with alterations in chromatin structure that include the generation of regular nucleosome arrays similar to those observed in centric heterochromatin (Sun et al. 2001; Danzer and Wallrath 2004). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments demonstrated that HP1 spreads bidirectionally, 5–10 kb from the lacO repeats, encompassing the reporter genes (Danzer and Wallrath 2004). Thus, HP1 is sufficient to nucleate small heterochromatin-like domains at genomic locations devoid of repetitious sequences, allowing for molecular studies of spreading.HP1 contains an amino terminal chromo domain (CD) and a carboxy chromo shadow domain (CSD), separated by a flexible hinge (Li et al. 2002). The CD forms a hydrophobic pocket implicated in chromosomal association through binding to di- and trimethylated lysine 9 of histone H3 (H3K9me2 and me3, respectively), an epigenetic mark generated by the histone methyltransferases (HMT) SU(VAR)3-9 and dSETDB1 (also known as Egg) (Jacobs et al. 2001; Schotta et al. 2002; Schultz et al. 2002; Ebert et al. 2004; Clough et al. 2007; Seum et al. 2007; Tzeng et al. 2007). Association with methylated H3 is one mechanism of HP1 chromosome association; however, other mechanisms involving interactions with DNA and/or partner proteins likely exist (Fanti et al. 1998; Li et al. 2002; Cryderman et al. 2005). In Drosophila HP1, a single amino acid substitution within the CD (V26M) is present in the Su(var)2-5⁰² allele; flies heterozygous for this allele show suppression of gene silencing by heterochromatin (Eissenberg et al. 1990). Furthermore, flies trans-heterozygous for Su(var)2-5⁰² and a null allele of Su(var)2-5 show dramatic reduction of HP1 near centromeres and do not survive past the third larval stage (Fanti et al. 1998). Consistent with these observations, structural studies show that V26 plays a critical role in forming the hydrophobic pocket of the CD that binds to H3K9me (Jacobs et al. 2001).The HP1 CSD dimerizes and mediates interactions with a variety of nuclear proteins (Cowieson et al. 2000; Yamamoto and Sonoda 2003; Thiru et al. 2004). CSD dimerization sets up an interaction platform for the binding of proteins possessing a penta-peptide motif, PxVxL (where x represents any amino acid) (Thiru et al. 2004; Lechner et al. 2005). Amino acid substitutions within HP1 have been identified that disrupt dimerization, and interaction with PxVxL proteins (Lechner et al. 2000; Thiru et al. 2004). For example, a single amino acid substitution within the CSD (I161E) disrupts dimerization of mouse HP1beta (Brasher et al. 2000). The lack of dimerization also caused the loss of interactions with nuclear factors containing PxVxL motifs and non-PxVxL partners (Yamamoto and Sonoda 2003; Lechner et al. 2005). In contrast, a single amino acid substitution elsewhere in the CSD (W170A) of mouse HP1beta does not prevent dimerization, but disrupts the interaction with PxVxL partner proteins (Brasher et al. 2000). Therefore, the requirement for HP1 dimerization and binding to the PxVxL proteins can be functionally separated. Here, we investigate effects of HP1 domain deletions and amino acid substitutions on HP1 localization, partner protein interactions, and heterochromatin spreading.     

Genetic Analysis of Delta, a Neurogenic Gene of Drosophila melanogaster

We report here the results of a genetic analysis of the gene Delta (Dl) of Drosophila melanogaster. Dl has been mapped to the band 92A2, on the basis of two pieces of evidence: (1) this band is the common breakpoint of several chromosomal aberrations associated with Dl mutations and (2) recombination mapping of alleles of five different lethal complementation groups that are uncovered by Df( 3R)Dl(FX3) (breakpoints at 91F11; 92A3). Dl was found to map most distally of all five complementation groups. The analysis of a large number of Dl alleles demonstrates the considerable genetic and functional complexity of Dl. Three types of Dl alleles are distinguishable. Most alleles behave as amorphic or hypomorphic recessive embryonic lethal alleles, which in addition cause various defects in heterozygosity over the wild-type allele. The defects are due to haplo-insufficient expression of the locus and can be suppressed by a duplication of the wild-type allele. The second class is comprised of three alleles with antimorphic expression. The phenotype of these alleles can only be reduced, rather than suppressed, by a duplication of the wild-type allele. The third group is comprised of three visible, predominantly hypomorphic alleles with an antimorphic component of phenotypic expression. The pattern of interallelic complementation is complex. On the one hand, there is a group of hypomorphic, fully penetrant embryonic lethal alleles which complement each other. On the other hand, most alleles, including all amorphic alleles, are viable over the visible ones; alleles of antimorphic expression, however, are lethal over visible alleles. These results are compatible with a rather complex genetic organization of the Dl locus.     

Accumulation of Transposable Elements in the Heterochromatin and on the Y Chromosome of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster

The elements of the transposon families G, copia, mdg 1, 412, and gypsy that are located in the heterochromatin and on the Y chromosome have been identified by the Southern blotting technique in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster populations. Within species, the abundance of such elements differs between transposon families. Between species, the abundance in the heterochromatin and on the Y chromosome of the elements of the same family can differ greatly suggesting that differences within a species are unrelated to structural features of elements. By shedding some new light on the mechanism of accumulation of transposable elements in the heterochromatin, these data appear relevant to the understanding of the long-term interaction between transposable elements and the host genome. Received: 8 August 1997 / Accepted: 11 December 1997     

The Role of Heterochromatin in the Expression of a Heterochromatic Gene, the Rolled Locus of Drosophila Melanogaster

Constitutive heterochromatic regions of chromosomes are those that remain condensed through most or all of the cell cycle. In Drosophila melanogaster, the constitutive heterochromatic regions, located around the centromere, contain a number of gene loci, but at a much lower density than euchromatin. In the autosomal heterochromatin, the gene loci appear to be unique sequence genes interspersed among blocks of highly repeated sequences. Euchromatic genes do not function well when brought into the vicinity of heterochromatin (position-effect variegation). We test the possibility that the blocks of centromeric heterochromatin provide an environment essential for heterochromatic gene function. To assay directly the functional requirement of autosomal heterochromatic genes to reside in heterochromatin, the rolled (rl) gene, which is normally located deep in chromosome 2R heterochromatin, was relocated within small blocks of heterochromatin to a variety of euchromatic positions by successive series of chromosomal rearrangements. The function of the rl gene is severely affected in rearrangements in which the rl gene is isolated in a small block of heterochromatin, and these position effects can be reverted by rearrangements which bring the rl gene closer to any large block of autosomal or X chromosome heterochromatin. There is some evidence that five other 2R heterochromatic genes are also affected among these rearrangements. These findings demonstrate that the heterochromatic genes, in contrast to euchromatic genes whose function is inhibited by relocation to heterochromatin, require proximity to heterochromatin to function properly, and they argue strongly that a major function of the highly repeated satellite DNA, which comprises most of the heterochromatin, is to provide this heterochromatic environment.     

Sex Differences in Drosophila melanogaster Heterochromatin Are Regulated by Non-Sex Specific Factors

The eukaryotic genome is assembled into distinct types of chromatin. Gene-rich euchromatin has active chromatin marks, while heterochromatin is gene-poor and enriched for silencing marks. In spite of this, genes native to heterochromatic regions are dependent on their normal environment for full expression. Expression of genes in autosomal heterochromatin is reduced in male flies mutated for the noncoding roX RNAs, but not in females. roX mutations also disrupt silencing of reporter genes in male, but not female, heterochromatin, revealing a sex difference in heterochromatin. We adopted a genetic approach to determine how this difference is regulated, and found no evidence that known X chromosome counting elements, or the sex determination pathway that these control, are involved. This suggested that the sex chromosome karyotype regulates autosomal heterochromatin by a different mechanism. To address this, candidate genes that regulate chromosome organization were examined. In XX flies mutation of Topoisomerase II (Top2), a gene involved in chromatin organization and homolog pairing, made heterochromatic silencing dependent on roX, and thus male-like. Interestingly, Top2 also binds to a large block of pericentromeric satellite repeats (359 bp repeats) that are unique to the X chromosome. Deletion of X heterochromatin also makes autosomal heterochromatin in XX flies dependent on roX and enhances the effect of Top2 mutations, suggesting a combinatorial action. We postulate that Top2 and X heterochromatin in Drosophila comprise a novel karyotype-sensing pathway that determines the sensitivity of autosomal heterochromatin to loss of roX RNA.     

A Distinct Type of Heterochromatin at the Telomeric Region of the Drosophila melanogaster Y Chromosome

Heterochromatin assembly and its associated phenotype, position effect variegation (PEV), provide an informative system to study chromatin structure and genome packaging. In the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, the Y chromosome is entirely heterochromatic in all cell types except the male germline; as such, Y chromosome dosage is a potent modifier of PEV. However, neither Y heterochromatin composition, nor its assembly, has been carefully studied. Here, we report the mapping and characterization of eight reporter lines that show male-specific PEV. In all eight cases, the reporter insertion sites lie in the telomeric transposon array (HeT-A and TART-B2 homologous repeats) of the Y chromosome short arm (Ys). Investigations of the impact on the PEV phenotype of mutations in known heterochromatin proteins (i.e., modifiers of PEV) show that this Ys telomeric region is a unique heterochromatin domain: it displays sensitivity to mutations in HP1a, EGG and SU(VAR)3-9, but no sensitivity to Su(z)2 mutations. It appears that the endo-siRNA pathway plays a major targeting role for this domain. Interestingly, an ectopic copy of 1360 is sufficient to induce a piRNA targeting mechanism to further enhance silencing of a reporter cytologically localized to the Ys telomere. These results demonstrate the diversity of heterochromatin domains, and the corresponding variation in potential targeting mechanisms.     

Evolution of DNA in Heterochromatin: the Drosophila Melanogaster Sibling Species Subgroup as a Resource

The Drosophila melanogasterspecies subgroup is a closely-knit collection of eight sibling species whose relationships are well defined. These species are too close for most evolutionary studies of euchromatic genes but are ideal to investigate the major changes that occur to DNA in heterochromatin over short periods during evolution. For example, it is not known whether the locations of genes in heterochromatin are conserved over this time. The 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA genes can be considered as genuine heterochromatic genes. In D. melanogasterthe rRNA genes are located at two sites, one each on the X and Y chromosome. In the other seven sibling species, rRNA genes are also located on the sex chromosomes but the positions often vary significantly, particularly on the Y. Furthermore, rDNA has been lost from the Y chromosome of both D. simulansand D. sechellia, presumably after separation of the line leading to present-day D. mauritiana.We conclude that changes to chromosomal position and copy number of rDNA arrays occur over much shorter evolutionary timespans than previously thought. In these respects the rDNA behaves more like the tandemly repeated satellite DNAs than euchromatic genes. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Evolution of late-life fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster

Late-life fecundity has been shown to plateau at late ages in Drosophila analogously to late-life mortality rates. In this study, we test an evolutionary theory of late life based on the declining force of natural selection that can explain the occurrence of these late-life plateaus in Drosophila. We also examine the viability of eggs laid by late-age females and test a population genetic mechanism that may be involved in the evolution of late-life fecundity: antagonistic pleiotropy. Together these experiments demonstrate that (i) fecundity plateaus at late ages, (ii) plateaus evolve according to the age at which the force of natural selection acting on fecundity reaches zero, (iii) eggs laid by females in late life are viable and (iv) antagonistic pleiotropy is involved in the evolution of late-life fecundity. This study further supports the evolutionary theory of late life based on the age-specific force of natural selection.     

Evolution of late-life mortality in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract.— Aging appears to cease at late ages, when mortality rates roughly plateau in large-scale demographic studies. This anomalous plateau in late-life mortality has been explained theoretically in two ways: (1) as a strictly demographic result of heterogeneity in life-long robustness between individuals within cohorts, and (2) as an evolutionary result of the plateau in the force of natural selection after the end of reproduction. Here we test the latter theory using cohorts of Drosophila melanogaster cultured with different ages of reproduction for many generations. We show in two independent comparisons that populations that evolve with early truncation of reproduction exhibit earlier onset of mortality-rate plateaus, in conformity with evolutionary theory. In addition, we test two population genetic mechanisms that may be involved in the evolution of late-life mortality: mutation accumulation and antagonistic pleiotropy. We test mutation accumulation by crossing genetically divergent, yet demographically identical, populations, testing for hybrid vigor between the hybrid and nonhybrid parental populations. We found no difference between the hybrid and nonhybrid populations in late-life mortality rates, a result that does not support mutation accumulation as a genetic mechanism for late-life mortality, assuming mutations act recessively. Finally, we test antagonistic pleiotropy by returning replicate populations to a much earlier age of last reproduction for a short evolutionary time, testing for a rapid indirect response of late-life mortality rates. The positive results from this test support antagonistic pleiotropy as a genetic mechanism for the evolution of late-life mortality. Together these experiments comprise the first corroborations of the evolutionary theory of late-life mortality.     

Heterochromatin protein 1 is involved in control of telomere elongation in Drosophila melanogaster

Telomeres of Drosophila melanogaster contain arrays of the retrotransposon-like elements HeT-A and TART. Their transposition to broken chromosome ends has been implicated in chromosome healing and telomere elongation. We have developed a genetic system which enables the determination of the frequency of telomere elongation events and their mechanism. The frequency differs among lines with different genotypes, suggesting that several genes are in control. Here we show that the Su(var)2-5 gene encoding heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) is involved in regulation of telomere length. Different Su(var)2-5 mutations in the heterozygous state increase the frequency of HeT-A and TART attachment to the broken chromosome end by more than a hundred times. The attachment occurs through either HeT-A/TART transposition or recombination with other telomeres. Terminal DNA elongation by gene conversion is greatly enhanced by Su(var)2-5 mutations only if the template for DNA synthesis is on the same chromosome but not on the homologous chromosome. The Drosophila lines bearing the Su(var)2-5 mutations maintain extremely long telomeres consisting of HeT-A and TART for many generations. Thus, HP1 plays an important role in the control of telomere elongation in D. melanogaster.     

Evolution of the olfactory code in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup

The Drosophila melanogaster subgroup has been the focus of numerous studies about evolution. We address the question of how the olfactory code has evolved among the nine sister species. By using in vivo electrophysiological measurements, so called single-cell recordings, we have established the ligand affinity of a defined subset of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) across all nine species. We show that the olfactory code as relayed by the investigated subset of ORNs is conserved to a striking degree. Distinct shifts in the code have occurred only within the simulans clade. However, these shifts are restricted to an altered tuning profile of the same single ORN type in all three of the simulans siblings and a more drastic change unique to D. sechellia, involving a complete loss of one sensillum type in favour of another. The alterations observed in D. sechellia may represent a novel host-specific adaptation to its sole host, morinda fruit (Morinda citrifolia). The overall high degree of similarity of the code within the subgroup is intriguing when considering the great variety in distributions as well as in habitat and host choice of the siblings, factors that could greatly affect the olfactory system.     

Multiple Allelism of the net Gene in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans

Thenetgene mutations are known to cause abnormal pattern of veining in all wing regions except for the first posterior cells. In natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster, the net alleles were identified, which differ in phenotypic expression from standard mutations. The mutants net-extra-analis from a population Belokurikha-2000 have only a single additional vein in the third posterior cell. A line from Chernobyl-1986 population have another nontypical allele net ^Ch86 and shows a lower degree of abnormalities than that usually observed. About 10% of these flies have an additional vein fragment in the first posterior cell. In both males and females ofD. simulans population Tashkent -2001, which exhibit net ^ST91 mutation, a net of additional veins is formed as a specific additional fragment in the first posterior cell. The pattern of veining conferred by alleles net-extra-analis and net ^Ch86 is altered to a lesser extent; these alleles are dominant with respect to alleles net ^2-45 and net ^ST91, which cause more abnormalities. The heterozygotes for alleles net ^ST9 and net ^Ch86 and for Df(2) net ⁶² deletion have an additional fragment in the first posterior cell and show similarly strong deviations from normal wing vein pattern. The naturalnet alleles correspond, presumably, to different molecular gene defects involved into uncertain local interactions with numerous modifying factors and other genes that specify the wing vein pattern.     

Identification of One Intron Loss and Phylogenetic Evolution of Dfak Gene in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group

Intron loss and its evolutionary significance have been noted in Drosophila. The current study provides another example of intron loss within a single-copy Dfak gene in Drosophila. By using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we amplified about 1.3 kb fragment spanning intron 5–10, located in the position of Tyr kinase (TyK) domain of Dfak gene from Drosophila melanogaster species group, and observed size difference among the amplified DNA fragments from different species. Further sequencing analysis revealed that D. melanogaster and D. simulans deleted an about 60 bp of DNA fragment relative to other 7 Drosophila species, such as D. elegans, D. ficusphila, D. biarmipes, D. takahashii, D. jambulina, D. prostipennis and D. pseudoobscura, and the deleted fragment located precisely in the position of one intron. The data suggested that intron loss might have occurred in the Dfak gene evolutionary process of D. melanogaster and D. simulans of Drosophila melanogaster species group. In addition, the constructed phylogenetic tree based on the Dfak TyK domains clearly revealed the evolutionary relationships between subgroups of Drosophila melanogaster species group, and the intron loss identified from D. melanogaster and D. simulans provides a unique diagnostic tool for taxonomic classification of the melanogaster subgroup from other group of genus Drosophila.     

Gene expression patterns accompanying a dietary shift in Drosophila melanogaster

The ability of many organisms to switch to new hosts can be critical to their survival in the wild. However, the genetic mechanisms underlying such shifts are poorly understood. In this study, we used complementary DNA (cDNA) microarrays to ask if changes in gene expression are observed in response to a dietary shift in Drosophila melanogaster, a dietary generalist. We found significant and repeatable differential expression in a number of genes related to metabolic function and stress, suggesting that a functional genomics approach will be useful in seeking loci involved in the ability of flies to utilize different resources.