Interaction of influenza virus proteins with planar bilayer lipid membranes. II. Effects of rimantadine and amantadine

The dependence of the surface potential difference (delta U), transversal elasticity module (E1) and membrane conductivity (G0) on the concentrations of the antiviral drugs, rimantadine and amantadine was studied in the planar bilayer lipid membrane system. The method used was based on independent measurements of the second and third harmonics of the membrane capacitance current. The binding constants of bilayer lipid membranes obtained from the drug adsorption isotherms were 2.1 X 10(5) M-1 and 1.3 X 10(4) M-1 for rimantadine and amantadine, respectively. The changes in G0 took place only after drug adsorption saturation had been achieved. The influence of rimantadine and amantadine on the interaction of bilayer lipid membranes with matrix protein from influenza virus was also investigated. The presence of 70 micrograms/ml rimantadine in the bathing solution resulted in an increase in the concentration of M-protein at which the adsorption and conductance changes were observed. The effects of amantadine were similar to those of rimantadine but required a higher critical concentration of amantadine. The results obtained suggest that the antiviral properties of rimantadine and amantadine may be related to the interaction of these drugs with the cell membrane, which can affect virus penetration into the cell as well as maturation of the viral particle at the cell membrane.     

Interaction of influenza virus proteins with planar bilayer lipid membranes II. Effects of rimantadine and amantadine

The dependence of the surface potential difference (ΔU), transversal elasticity module (E₁) and membrane conductivity (G₀) on the concentrations of the antiviral drugs, rimantadine and amantadine was studied in the planar bilayer lipid membrane system. The method used was based on independent measurements of the second and third harmonics of the membrane capacitance current. The binding constants of bilayer lipid membranes obtained from the drug adsorption isotherms were 2.1 · 10⁵ M^?1 and 1.3 · 10⁴ M^?1 for rimantadine and amantadine, respectively. The changes in G₀ took place only after drug adsorption saturation had been achieved. The influence of rimantadine and amantadine on the interaction of bilayer lipid membranes with matrix protein from influenza virus was also investigated. The presence of 70 μg/ml rimantadine in the bathing solution resulted in an increase in the concentration of M-protein at which the adsorption and conductance changes were observed. The effects of amantadine were similar to those of rimantadine but required a higher critical concentration of amantadine. The results obtained suggest that the antiviral properties of rimantadine and amantadine may be related to the interaction of these drugs with the cell membrane, which can affect virus penetration into the cell as well as maturation of the viral particle at the cell membrane.     

Inhibitors of the Influenza A Virus M2 Proton Channel Discovered Using a High-Throughput Yeast Growth Restoration Assay

The M2 proton channel of the influenza A virus is the target of the anti-influenza drugs amantadine and rimantadine. The effectiveness of these drugs has been dramatically limited by the rapid spread of drug resistant mutations, mainly at sites S31N, V27A and L26F in the pore of the channel. Despite progress in designing inhibitors of V27A and L26F M2, there are currently no drugs targeting these mutated channels in clinical trials. Progress in developing new drugs has been hampered by the lack of a robust assay with sufficient throughput for discovery of new active chemotypes among chemical libraries and sufficient sensitivity to provide the SAR data essential for their improvement and development as drugs. In this study we adapted a yeast growth restoration assay, in which expression of the M2 channel inhibits yeast growth and exposure to an M2 channel inhibitor restores growth, into a robust and sensitive high-throughput screen for M2 channel inhibitors. A screen of over 250,000 pure chemicals and semi-purified fractions from natural extracts identified 21 active compounds comprising amantadine, rimantadine, 13 related adamantanes and 6 non-adamantanes. Of the non-adamantanes, hexamethylene amiloride and a triazine derivative represented new M2 inhibitory chemotypes that also showed antiviral activity in a plaque reduction assay. Of particular interest is the fact that the triazine derivative was not sufficiently potent for detection as an inhibitor in the traditional two electrode voltage clamp assay for M2 channel activity, but its discovery in the yeast assay led to testing of analogues of which one was as potent as amantadine.     

Rimantadine but not amantadine protects fischer rat embryo cells from transformation induced by 3-methylcholanthrene or benzo(a)pyrene

Summary The antiviral drugs amantadine hydrochloride and rimantadine hydrochloride were tested as to their oncogenic potential using a serial line of Fischer rat embryo cells that previously had been shown to be an accurate indicator of chemicals known to be oncogenic in animal studies. Neither compound was found to have transforming activity. At slightly toxic levels, rimantadine hydrochloride, but not amantadine hydrochloride, protected the same cell line from the transformation induced by the polycyclic hydrocarbons 3-methylcholanthrene and benzo(a)pyrene. This work was supported by Contract N01-CP-43240 within The Virus Cancer Program of the National Cancer Institute.     

Computational Investigation of Drug-Resistant Mutant of M2 Proton Channel (S31N) Against Rimantadine

M2 proton channel is the target for treating the patients who ere suffering from influenza A infection, which facilitates the spread of virions. Amantadine and rimantadine are adamantadine-based drugs, which target M2 proton channel and inhibit the viral replication. Preferably, rimantadine drug is used more than amantadine because of its fewer side effects. However, S31N mutation in the M2 proton channel was highly resistant to the rimantadine drug. Therefore, in the present study, we focused to understand the drug-resistance mechanism of S31N mutation with the aid of molecular docking and dynamics approach. The docking analysis undoubtedly indicates that affinity for rimantadine with mutant-type M2 proton channel is significantly lesser than the native-type M2 proton channel. In addition, RMSD, RMSF, and principal component analysis suggested that the mutation shows increased flexibility. Furthermore, the intermolecular hydrogen bonds analysis showed that there is a complete loss of hydrogen bonds in the mutant complex. On the whole, we conclude that the intermolecular contact was maintained by D-44, a key residue for stable binding of rimantadine. These findings are certainly helpful for better understanding of drug-resistance mechanism and also helpful for designing new drugs for treating influenza infection against drug-resistance target.     

Triple Combination of Amantadine,Ribavirin, and Oseltamivir Is Highly Active and Synergistic against Drug Resistant Influenza Virus Strains In Vitro

The rapid emergence and subsequent spread of the novel 2009 Influenza A/H1N1 virus (2009 H1N1) has prompted the World Health Organization to declare the first pandemic of the 21^st century, highlighting the threat of influenza to public health and healthcare systems. Widespread resistance to both classes of influenza antivirals (adamantanes and neuraminidase inhibitors) occurs in both pandemic and seasonal viruses, rendering these drugs to be of marginal utility in the treatment modality. Worldwide, virtually all 2009 H1N1 and seasonal H3N2 strains are resistant to the adamantanes (rimantadine and amantadine), and the majority of seasonal H1N1 strains are resistant to oseltamivir, the most widely prescribed neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI). To address the need for more effective therapy, we evaluated the in vitro activity of a triple combination antiviral drug (TCAD) regimen composed of drugs with different mechanisms of action against drug-resistant seasonal and 2009 H1N1 influenza viruses. Amantadine, ribavirin, and oseltamivir, alone and in combination, were tested against amantadine- and oseltamivir-resistant influenza A viruses using an in vitro infection model in MDCK cells. Our data show that the triple combination was highly synergistic against drug-resistant viruses, and the synergy of the triple combination was significantly greater than the synergy of any double combination tested (P<0.05), including the combination of two NAIs. Surprisingly, amantadine and oseltamivir contributed to the antiviral activity of the TCAD regimen against amantadine- and oseltamivir-resistant viruses, respectively, at concentrations where they had no activity as single agents, and at concentrations that were clinically achievable. Our data demonstrate that the TCAD regimen composed of amantadine, ribavirin, and oseltamivir is highly synergistic against resistant viruses, including 2009 H1N1. The TCAD regimen overcomes baseline drug resistance to both classes of approved influenza antivirals, and thus may represent a highly active antiviral therapy for seasonal and pandemic influenza.     

Design of an Efficient Inhibitor for the Influenza A Virus M2 Ion Channel

Influenza A virus is capable of rapidly infecting large human populations, warranting the development of novel drugs to efficiently inhibit virus replication. A transmembrane ion channel formed by the M2 protein plays an important role in influenza virus replication. A reasonable approach to designing an effective antivirus drug is constructing a molecule that binds in the M2 transmembrane proton channel, blocks H+ proton diffusion through the channel, and thus the influenza A virus cycle. The known anti-influenza drugs amantadine and rimantadine have a weak effect on influenza A virus replication. A new class of positively charged molecules, diazabicyclooctane derivatives with a constant charge of +2, was proposed to block proton diffusion through the M2 ion channel. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed to study the temperature fluctuations in the M2 structure, and ionization states of histidine residues were established at physiological pH values. Two types of diazabicyclooctane derivatives were analyzed for binding with the M2 ion channel. An optimal structure was determined for a blocker to most efficiently bind with the M2 ion channel and block proton diffusion. The new molecule is advantageous over amantadine and rimantadine in having a positive charge of +2, which creates a positive electrostatic potential barrier to proton transport through the M2 ion channel in addition to a steric barrier.     

Grand rounds at the National Institutes of Health: HDAC inhibitors as radiation modifiers, from bench to clinic

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant brain tumour. Patients afflicted with this disease unfortunately have a very poor prognosis, and fewer than 5% of patients survive for 5 years from the time of diagnosis. Therefore, improved therapies to treat this disease are sorely needed. One such class of drugs that have generated great enthusiasm for the treatment of numerous malignancies, including GBM, is histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. Pre-clinical data have demonstrated the efficacy of various HDAC inhibitors as anticancer agents, with the greatest effects shown when HDAC inhibitors are used in combination with other therapies. As a result of encouraging pre-clinical data, numerous HDAC inhibitors are under investigation in clinical trials, either as monotherapies or in conjunction with other treatments such as chemotherapy, biologic therapy or radiation therapy. In fact, two actively studied HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat and depsipeptide, were recently approved for the treatment of refractory cutaneous T cell lymphoma. In this review, we first present a patient with GBM, and then discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology and current treatment options of GBM. Finally, we examine the translation of pre-clinical studies that have demonstrated HDAC inhibitors as potent radiosensitizers in in vitro and in vivo models, to a phase II clinical trial combining the HDAC inhibitor, valproic acid, along with temozolomide and radiation therapy for the treatment of GBM.     

Rimantadine but not amantadine protects Fischer rat embryo cells from transformation induced by 3-methylcholanthrene or benzo(a)pyrene.

The antiviral drugs amantadine hydrochloride and rimantadine hydrochloride were tested as to their oncogenic potential using a serial line of Fischer rat embryo cells that previously had been shown to be an accurate indicator of chemicals known to be oncogenic in animal studies. Neither compound was found to have transforming activity. At slightly toxic levels, rimanbadine hydrochloride, but not amantadine hydrochloride, protected the same cell line from the transformation induced by the polycyclic hydrocarbons 3-methylcholanthrene and benzo(a)pyrene.     

Designing Inhibitors of M2 Proton Channel against H1N1 Swine Influenza Virus

Background

M2 proton channel of H1N1 influenza A virus is the target protein of anti-flu drugs amantadine and rimantadine. However, the two once powerful adamantane-based drugs lost their 90% bioactivity because of mutations of virus in recent twenty years. The NMR structure of the M2 channel protein determined by Schnell and Chou (Nature, 2008, 451, 591–595) may help people to solve the drug-resistant problem and develop more powerful new drugs against H1N1 influenza virus.

Methodology

Docking calculation is performed to build the complex structure between receptor M2 proton channel and ligands, including existing drugs amantadine and rimantadine, and two newly designed inhibitors. The computer-aided drug design methods are used to calculate the binding free energies, with the computational biology techniques to analyze the interactions between M2 proton channel and adamantine-based inhibitors.

Conclusions

1) The NMR structure of M2 proton channel provides a reliable structural basis for rational drug design against influenza virus. 2) The channel gating mechanism and the inhibiting mechanism of M2 proton channel, revealed by the NMR structure of M2 proton channel, provides the new ideas for channel inhibitor design. 3) The newly designed adamantane-based inhibitors based on the modeled structure of H1N1-M2 proton channel have two pharmacophore groups, which act like a “barrel hoop”, holding two adjacent helices of the H1N1-M2 tetramer through the two pharmacophore groups outside the channel. 4) The inhibitors with such binding mechanism may overcome the drug resistance problem of influenza A virus to the adamantane-based drugs.     

Flu channel drug resistance: a tale of two sites

The M2 proteins of influenza A and B virus, AM2 and BM2, respectively, are transmembrane proteins that oligomerize in the viral membrane to form proton-selective channels. Proton conductance of the M2 proteins is required for viral replication; it is believed to equilibrate pH across the viral membrane during cell entry and across the trans-Golgi membrane of infected cells during viral maturation. In addition to the role of M2 in proton conductance, recent mutagenesis and structural studies suggest that the cytoplasmic domains of the M2 proteins also play a role in recruiting the matrix proteins to the cell surface during virus budding. As viral ion channels of minimalist architecture, the membrane-embedded channel domain of M2 has been a model system for investigating the mechanism of proton conduction. Moreover, as a proven drug target for the treatment of influenza A infection, M2 has been the subject of intense research for developing new anti-flu therapeutics. AM2 is the target of two anti-influenza A drugs, amantadine and rimantadine, both belonging to the adamantane class of compounds. However, resistance of influenza A to adamantane is now widespread due to mutations in the channel domain of AM2. This review summarizes the structure and function of both AM2 and BM2 channels, the mechanism of drug inhibition and drug resistance of AM2, as well as the development of new M2 inhibitors as potential anti-flu drugs.     

Current status for influenza control

Influenza viruses are responsible for respiratory illness with significant morbidity and mortality. To curb the disease, two-pronged attack on the virus, therapeutic and prophylactic, is being actively pursued. The therapeutic use of existing anti-influenza drugs, such as amantadine and rimantadine, is limited by their significant adverse side effect, emergence of resistant viral strains, and lack of activity against influenza B virus. A new class of antiviral agents designed to inhibit influenza neuraminidase are currently under active development for use in the prophylaxis and treatment of influenza A and B virus infections. Two of these compounds, zanamivir (GG167) and GS4104 have reached clinical trials. Limitations in the effectiveness and application of inactivated vaccines have stimulated development of alternative approaches to influenza immunization. One such approach is a live, intranasally administered vaccine, attenuated by cold-adaptation of a master strain with subsequent genetic reassortment with circulating wild-type strains. Recently developed reverse-genetics techniques have made it possible to use RNA viruses as vector. Besides DNA viral vectors, live influenza virus vectors may emerge as a useful alternative for the vaccination against different pathogens.     

Molecular therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis

In an attempt to combat the pain and damage generated by rheumatoid arthritis (ra), new drugs are being developed to target molecular aspects of the disease process. Recently, a major development has been the use of biologicals (antibodies and soluble receptors) that neutralise the activity of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin 1 (IL-1), both of which are involved in disease progression. An increase in our understanding of cell and molecular biology has resulted in the identification and investigation of potential new targets, and also the refinement and improvement of current therapeutic modalities. This review describes therapies that are approved, in clinical trials or under pre-clinical investigation at the laboratory level, particularly focusing on cytokines, although other therapeutic targets of interest are mentioned.     

Peptides as tools and drugs for immunotherapies.

Peptides are essential tools for discovery and pre-clinical and pharmaceutical development of viral and cancer vaccines ('active immunotherapies') as well as for therapeutic antibodies ('passive immunotherapies'). They help to trigger and analyze immune responses at a molecular level (B-cell, T-helper and CTL epitopes). They contribute largely to the design of new vaccine candidates and to the generation of monoclonal antibodies. They are also valuable analytical reference compounds for the structural characterisation by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry of recombinant proteins used as biopharmaceuticals. As for other therapeutic applications, formulation, solubilisation, batch consistency and stability, issues have to be addressed to allow the pre-clinical and clinical development of this class of compounds as immunotherapeutic drugs. In the present review, three case studies dealing with (i) the design and the characterisation of Respiratory Syntycial Virus subunit vaccines, (ii) peptide-based melanoma vaccines, and (iii) therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, all investigated in clinical trials, are reported and discussed.     

Design and synthesis of bioactive adamantane spiro heterocycles

Spiro[aziridine-2,2'-adamantanes] 1 and 2, spiro[azetidine-2,2'-adamantanes] 3 and 5, spiro[azetidine-3,2'-adamantane] 13, spiro[piperidine-4,2'-adamantanes] 25 and 27, and spiro barbituric analog 18 were synthesized and tested for their anti-influenza A virus properties and for trypanocidal activity. The effect of ring size on potency was investigated. Piperidine 25 showed significant anti-influenza A virus activity, being 12-fold more active than amantadine, about 2-fold more active than rimantadine, and 54-fold more potent than ribavirin. It also proved to be the most active of the compounds tested against bloodstream forms of the African trypanosome, Trypanosoma brucei, being 1.5 times more potent than rimantadine and at least 25 times more active than amantadine.     

Chemotherapy and vaccination: a possible strategy for the control of highly virulent influenza virus.

The influenza A virus [A/Chicken/Pennsylvania/1370/83 (H5N2)] that caused up to 80% mortality among chickens provided a model system for testing the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents against highly virulent influenza virus. Amantadine and rimantadine administered in drinking water were efficacious both prophylactically and therapeutically. However, under conditions simulating natural transmission of virus, amantadine- and rimantadine-resistant viruses arose and were transmitted to other birds in contact with the infected chickens, causing mortality. Simultaneous administration of inactivated H5N2 vaccine and amantadine provided protection. Thus, chemotherapy may be useful in the treatment of a highly pathogenic influenza virus outbreak in humans or other animals when used in combination with vaccine.     

Structural investigation of rimantadine inhibition of the AM2-BM2 chimera channel of influenza viruses

The M2 channel of influenza A is a target of the adamantane family antiviral drugs. Two different drug-binding sites have been reported: one inside the pore, and the other is a lipid-facing pocket. A previous study showed that a chimera of M2 variants from influenza A and B that contains only the pore-binding site is sensitive to amantadine inhibition, suggesting that the primary site of inhibition is inside the pore. To obtain atomic details of channel-drug interaction, we determined the structures of the chimeric channel with and without rimantadine. Inside the channel and near the N-terminal end, methyl groups of Val27 and Ala30 from four subunits form a hydrophobic pocket around the adamantane, and the drug amino group appears to be in polar contact with the backbone oxygen of Ala30. The structures also reveal differences between the drug-bound and -unbound states of the channel that can explain drug resistance.     

Efficacy and clinical monitoring strategies for immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted cytokine immunotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer type and is the second leading cause of cancer deaths annually in the United States. Conventional treatment options include postoperative (adjuvant) and preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Although these treatment modalities have shown to decrease tumor burden, a major limitation to chemothearpy/radiotherapy is the high recurrence rate in patients. Immune-modulation strategies have emerged as a promising new therapeutic avenue to reduce this recurrence rate while minimizing undesirable systemic side effects. This review will focus specifically on the mechanisms of monoclonal antibodies: immune checkpoint inhibitors and cytokines, as well as current drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and new clinical/pre-clinical trials. Finally, this review will investigate emerging methods used to monitor tumor response post-treatment.     

Solution NMR structure of the V27A drug resistant mutant of influenza A M2 channel

The M2 protein of influenza A virus forms a proton-selective channel that is required for viral replication. It is the target of the anti-influenza drugs, amantadine and rimantadine. Widespread drug resistant mutants, however, has greatly compromised the effectiveness of these drugs. Here, we report the solution NMR structure of the highly pathogenic, drug resistant mutant V27A. The structure reveals subtle structural differences from wildtype that maybe linked to drug resistance. The V27A mutation significantly decreases hydrophobic packing between the N-terminal ends of the transmembrane helices, which explains the looser, more dynamic tetrameric assembly. The weakened channel assembly can resist drug binding either by destabilizing the rimantadine-binding pocket at Asp44, in the case of the allosteric inhibition model, or by reducing hydrophobic contacts with amantadine in the pore, in the case of the pore-blocking model. Moreover, the V27A structure shows a substantially increased channel opening at the N-terminal end, which may explain the faster proton conduction observed for this mutant. Furthermore, due to the high quality NMR data recorded for the V27A mutant, we were able to determine the structured region connecting the channel domain to the C-terminal amphipathic helices that was not determined in the wildtype structure. The new structural data show that the amphipathic helices are packed much more closely to the channel domain and provide new insights into the proton transfer pathway.