Comparison between steroid binding to membrane progesterone receptor α (mPRα) and to nuclear progesterone receptor: Correlation with physicochemical properties assessed by comparative molecular field analysis and identification of mPRα-specific agonists

Recent results showing that the binding characteristics of 33 steroids for human membrane progesterone receptor alpha (hu-mPRα) differ from those for the nuclear progesterone receptor (nPR) suggest that hu-mPRα-specific agonists can be identified for investigating its physiological functions. The binding affinities of an additional 21 steroids for hu-mPRα were determined to explore the structure–activity relationships in more detail and to identify potent, specific mPRα agonists. Four synthetic progesterone derivatives with methyl or methylene groups on positions 18 or 19, 18a-methylprogesterone (18-CH₃P4, Org OE 64-0), 13-ethenyl-18-norprogesterone (18-CH₂P4, Org 33663-0), 19a-methylprogesterone (19-CH₃P4, Org OD 13-0) and 10-ethenyl-19-norprogesterone (19-CH₂P4, Org OD 02-0), showed similar or higher affinities than progesterone for hu-mPRα and displayed mPRα agonist activities in G-protein and MAP kinase activation assays. All four steroids also bound to the nPR in cytosolic fractions of MCF-7 cells. However, two compounds, 19-CH₂P4 and 19-CH₃P4, showed no nPR agonist activity in a nPR reporter assay and therefore are selective mPRα agonists suitable for physiological investigations. The structure–binding relationships of the combined series of 54 steroids for hu-mPRα deviated strikingly from those of a published set of 60 3-keto or 3-desoxy steroids for nPR. Close correlations were observed between the receptor binding affinities of the steroids and their physicochemical properties calculated by comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) for both hu-mPRα and nPR. A comparison of the CoMFA field graphs for the two receptors revealed several differences in the structural features required for binding to hu-mPRα and nPR which could be exploited to develop additional mPR-specific ligands.     

Membrane progesterone receptor alpha as a potential prognostic biomarker for breast cancer survival: a retrospective study

Classically, the actions of progesterone (P4) are attributed to the binding of nuclear progesterone receptor (PR) and subsequent activation of its downstream target genes. These mechanisms, however, are not applicable to PR- or basal phenotype breast cancer (BPBC) due to lack of PR in these cancers. Recently, the function of membrane progesterone receptor alpha (mPRα) in human BPBC cell lines was studied in our lab. We proposed that the signaling cascades of P4→mPRα pathway may play an essential role in controlling cell proliferation and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) of breast cancer. Using human breast cancer tissue microarrays, we found in this study that the average intensity of mPRα expression, but not percentage of breast cancer with high level of mPRα expression (mPRα-HiEx), was significantly lower in the TNM stage 4 patients compared to those with TNM 1-3 patients; and both average intensities of mPRα expression and mPRα-HiEx rates were significantly higher in cancers negative for ER, as compared with those cancers with ER+. However, after adjusting for age at diagnosis and/or TNM stage, only average intensities of mPRα expression were associated with ER status. In addition, we found that the rates of mPRα-HiEx were significantly higher in cancers with epithelial growth factor receptor-1 (EGFR+) and high level of Ki67 expression, indicating positive correlation between mPRα over expression and EGFR or Ki67. Further analysis indicated that both mPRα-HiEx rate and average intensity of mPRα expression were significantly higher in HER2+ subtype cancers (i.e. HER2+ER-PR-) as compared to ER+ subtype cancers. These data support our hypothesis that P4 modulates the activities of the PI3K and cell proliferation pathways through the caveolar membrane bound growth factor receptors such as mPRα and growth factor receptors. Future large longitudinal studies with larger sample size and survival outcomes are necessary to confirm our findings.     

A computational analysis of non-genomic plasma membrane progestin binding proteins: Signaling through ion channel-linked cell surface receptors

A number of plasma membrane progestin receptors linked to non-genomic events have been identified. These include: (1) α1-subunit of the Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase (ATP1A1), (2) progestin binding PAQR proteins, (3) membrane progestin receptor alpha (mPRα), (4) progesterone receptor MAPR proteins and (5) the association of nuclear receptor (PRB) with the plasma membrane. This study compares: the pore-lining regions (ion channels), transmembrane (TM) helices, caveolin binding (CB) motifs and leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) of putative progesterone receptors. ATP1A1 contains 10 TM helices (TM-2, 4, 5, 6 and 8 are pores) and 4 CB motifs; whereas PAQR5, PAQR6, PAQR7, PAQRB8 and fish mPRα each contain 8 TM helices (TM-3 is a pore) and 2–4 CB motifs. MAPR proteins contain a single TM helix but lack pore-lining regions and CB motifs. PRB contains one or more TM helices in the steroid binding region, one of which is a pore. ATP1A1, PAQR5/7/8, mPRα, and MAPR-1 contain highly conserved leucine-rich repeats (LRR, common to plant membrane proteins) that are ligand binding sites for ouabain-like steroids associated with LRR kinases. LRR domains are within or overlap TM helices predicted to be ion channels (pore-lining regions), with the variable LRR sequence either at the C-terminus (PAQR and MAPR-1) or within an external loop (ATP1A1). Since ouabain-like steroids are produced by animal cells, our findings suggest that ATP1A1, PAQR5/7/8 and mPRα represent ion channel-linked receptors that respond physiologically to ouabain-like steroids (not progestin) similar to those known to regulate developmental and defense-related processes in plants.     

Broad tissue expression of membrane progesterone receptor Alpha in normal mice

The broad tissue distribution of membrane progesterone receptor alpha (mPRα) in vertebrates suggests multiple physiological functions of the receptor. Current knowledge regarding the receptor distribution, however, is largely obtained via non-histological assays. In this study, the tissue distribution of mPRα in mice of both sexes was described using both histological and non-histological methods. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that abundant expression of mPRα was consistently detected in the cytoplasm and membrane of smooth muscles in vasculatures, gastro-intestines, and uterus. It was also observed in myoepithelial cells of mammary gland and intra-ovarian myofibroblasts. These findings suggest that mPRα may function as a mediator of P4 in regulating function of smooth muscles or smooth muscle-like cells in numerous physiological processes such as vasodilation, transportation of contents within luminary organs, relaxation of the uterine myometrium during pregnancy, release of oocytes, and milk secretion. In addition, strong mPRα expression was identified in the parietal cells of gastric glands, indicating the potential roles of P4/mPRα signaling in the modulation of gastric acid secretion. Surprisingly, in the testis of male mice mPRα was mainly seen in the nuclei, rather than cytoplasm and/or membrane, of the primary and secondary spermatocytes, suggesting a direct role of the receptor in gene regulation. Our results indicate that mPRα may function as a key modulator of P4 in the modulation of multiple physiological functions in normal mice.     

Progesterone signals through membrane progesterone receptors (mPRs) in MDA-MB-468 and mPR-transfected MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells which lack full-length and N-terminally truncated isoforms of the nuclear progesterone receptor

The functional characteristics of membrane progesterone receptors (mPRs) have been investigated using recombinant mPR proteins over-expressed in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Although these cells do not express the full-length progesterone receptor (PR), it is not known whether they express N-terminally truncated PR isoforms which could possibly account for some progesterone receptor functions attributed to mPRs. In the present study, the presence of N-terminally truncated PR isoforms was investigated in untransfected and mPR-transfected MDA-MB-231 cells, and in MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells. PCR products were detected in PR-positive T47D Yb breast cancer cells using two sets of C-terminus PR primers, but not in untransfected and mPR-transfected MDA-MB-231 cells, nor in MDA-MB-468 cells. Western blot analysis using a C-terminal PR antibody, 2C11F1, showed the same distribution pattern for PR in these cell lines. Another C-terminal PR antibody, C-19, detected immunoreactive bands in all the cell lines, but also recognized α-actinin, indicating that the antibody is not specific for PR. High affinity progesterone receptor binding was identified on plasma membranes of MDA-MB-468 cells which was significantly decreased after treatment with siRNAs for mPRα and mPRβ. Plasma membranes of MDA-MB-468 cells showed very low binding affinity for the PR agonist, R5020, ≤1% that of progesterone, which is characteristic of mPRs. Progesterone treatment caused G protein activation and decreased production of cAMP in MDA-MB-468 cells, which is also characteristic of mPRs. The results indicate that the progestin receptor functions in these cell lines are mediated through mPRs and do not involve any N-terminally truncated PR isoforms.     

A Single Glycine-Alanine Exchange Directs Ligand Specificity of the Elephant Progestin Receptor

The primary gestagen of elephants is 5α-dihydroprogesterone (DHP), which is unlike all other mammals studied until now. The level of DHP in elephants equals that of progesterone in other mammals, and elephants are able to bind DHP with similar affinity to progesterone indicating a unique ligand-binding specificity of the elephant progestin receptor (PR). Using site-directed mutagenesis in combination with in vitro binding studies we here report that this change in specificity is due to a single glycine to alanine exchange at position 722 (G722A) of PR, which specifically increases DHP affinity while not affecting binding of progesterone. By conducting molecular dynamics simulations comparing human and elephant PR ligand-binding domains (LBD), we observed that the alanine methyl group at position 722 is able to push the DHP A-ring into a position similar to progesterone. In the human PR, the DHP A-ring position is twisted towards helix 3 of PR thereby disturbing the hydrogen bond pattern around the C3-keto group, resulting in a lower binding affinity. Furthermore, we observed that the elephant PR ligand-binding pocket is more rigid than the human analogue, which probably explains the higher affinity towards both progesterone and DHP. Interestingly, the G722A substitution is not elephant-specific, rather it is also present in five independent lineages of mammalian evolution, suggesting a special role of the substitution for the development of distinct mammalian gestagen systems.     

3-O-methoxyimino group inhibits interactions between progestins and blood transcortin

The interactions between E- and Z-isomers of 3-O-methoxyimino-pregn-4-ene-20-one and its 17α-hydroxy derivative and transcortin from human blood were investigated. The substitution of the progesterone 3-oxo group for a 3-O-methoxyimino group was shown to diminish the affinity of the steroid for transcortin by approximately one order of magnitude irrespective of the substituent’s orientation. The data suggests that progesterone derivatives substituted thereby must have higher bioavailability compared to progesterone and must not significantly affect the biodynamics of glucocorticoid in vivo.     

A progesterone receptor affinity chromatography reagent: 17α-Hexynyl nortestosterone sepharose

Several affinity chromatography reagents have been proposed for purification of progesterone receptor (PgR), and significant results have been achieved with some of these. None, however, have approached the results achieved in affinity chromatography of estrogen receptor. We have therefore synthesized a number of new 19-nortestosterone derivatives capable of chemically stable linkage with Sepharose beads, and have identified one with very high PgR affinity for further study. We first synthesized the epoxides of 17α-allyl nortestosterone, by analogy with the estradiol derivatization of Greene and Jensen. The relative affinity of these epoxides for PgR from T47D human breast cancer cells, however, was only around 5% that of R5020, and affinity beads prepared from them bound very little PgR. We then reacted appropriately protected 17α-ethynyl-nortestosterone with a series of diiodo alkanes, and found that 17α-(6'-iodohex-1'-ynyl)nortestosterone had an affinity of 22% relative to R5020, equal to the affinity of progesterone itself. Reaction with Thiopropyl-Sepharose 6B yielded hexynyl-nortestosterone-Sepharose beads with a ligand density of about 7 micromoles/ml beads. One-hundred μl of these beads adsorbed 71% of the PgR present in 1 ml ofcytosol from T47D cells. This adsorption was inhibited by 10 μM progesterone but not Cortisol, indicating the specificity of the binding. Comparisions with NADAC and Sterogel, other affinity beads used for PgR purification, show that the former takes up much less receptor, while the latter takes up and releases similar amounts of receptor but more extraneous protein, and is less stable. We therefore believe that hexynyl-nortestosterone-Sepharose, having a high density of a high affinity ligand, and having chemically and biochemically stable covalent bonds, should be a good reagent for affinity purification of PgR.     

Porcine spermatozoa contain more than one membrane progesterone receptor

Progesterone has been shown to be a physiologically relevant inducer of the sperm acrosome reaction. A novel protein intrinsic to microsomal membranes, membrane progesterone receptor (mPR, now termed progesterone membrane receptor component 1, PGMRC1) that binds progesterone with high affinity has been cloned from porcine liver previously, and corresponding antibodies mitigate the progesterone induced acrosome reaction. In this study we aimed at the localization of mPR in porcine spermatozoa. Immunostaining suggested the exclusive occurrence of mPR in a hardly accessible place, possibly the inner acrosomal membrane, with digitonin dramatically increasing the number of positively stained cells. Consistent with the structure prediction for mPR, its short N-terminus (NT) but not the large C-terminal part becomes accessible from outside after digitonin treatment as evidenced by the staining pattern of antibodies directed against different regions of the protein. However, digitonin treatment solubilizes a progesterone binding activity of approximately 140 kDa molecular weight, that is different from mPR, which remains in the cell membrane as demonstrated by Western blotting. Ligand binding studies confirm the dissimilarity of mPR and the digitonin-soluble progesterone binding protein. Chemical modification studies also indicate that the digitonin-soluble progesterone binding protein has a binding site that differs from that of mPR. It is concluded that more than one progesterone receptor is present in porcine spermatozoa.     

Properties of antisera to progesterone and to 17-hydroxy-progesterone elicited by immunization with the steroids attached to protein through position 7

Antibodies to progesterone (P) and to 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) were raised by immunization of rabbits with progesterone-7α-carboxyethyl thioether--bovine serum albumin (P-7—BSA) or with 17-OHP-7α-carboxyethyl thioether--BSA (17-OHP-7--BSA). The antisera produced were of high affinity: K_a towards the homologous hapten was 3. 7 × 10¹⁰ 1./mol for the anti-P serum and 5. 9 × 10⁹ 1/mol for the anti-17-OHP serum. The antiserum to P-7—BSA displayed little or no cross reaction (?= 2%) with the 20α-, 20β- or 5β-dihydro-derivatives of progesterone, moderate cross-reaction with pregnenolone (4%), but considerable cross-reaction with 11-deoxycorticosterone (7%), 5α-dihydro-progesterone (11%) and 17-OHP (15%). The antiserum to 17-OHP-7--BSA showed very little cross-reaction (?= 2%) with progesterone and other steroids lacking a 17α-hydroxyl group, such as pregnenolone or 11-deoxycorticosterone, but reacted significantly with 17α, 21-dihydroxy-4-pregnene-3, 20-dione (8%) and 3β, 17-dihydroxy-5-pregnen-20-one (13%). None of the sera reacted with testosterone, cortisol or estradiol-17β. It appears that conjugation of progesterone to protein through carbon-7 affords antisera comparable in specificity to those raised with 11α-conjugates and superior to those raised with 3-, 6- and 20-conjugates. The antiserum to 17-hydroxyprogesterone described is the first one that specifically recognizes this metabolite.     

Molecular interactions of progesterone derivatives with 5α-reductase types 1 and 2 and androgen receptors

The aim of this study was to ascertain the inhibitory effect of several progesterone derivatives for 5α-reductase types 1 and 2 isozymes and to determine the binding to the androgen receptor.The 3,20-dioxopregna-4-ene-17α-yl acetate 4 containing an acetoxy group in C-17 and steroid 17α-hydroxypregn-4-ene-3,20-dione 5 having a hydroxyl group in the same position inhibited both isozymes. On the other hand, 17α-hydroxy-4,5-epoxypregnan-3,20-dione 6 with an epoxy function at C-4, inhibited only the type 1 enzyme. Steroid 4-chloro-17α-hydroxypregn-4-ene-3,20-dione 7a and 4-bromo-17α-hydroxypregn-4-ene-3,20-dione 7b having the C-4 conjugated system and a chlorine or a bromine atom at C-4 respectively, inhibited both types of 5α-reductase. These results indicate that an increase in the electronegativity of ring A produces a major inhibitory activity for 5α-reductase type 1; however this increase was not observed for type 2 enzyme. When the free hydroxyl group of 7a or 7b was esterified, compounds 3,20-dioxo-4-chloropregn-4-ene-17α yl-4-ethylbenzoate 8a and 3,20-dioxo-4-bromopregn-4-ene-17α yl-4-ethylbenzoate 8b were obtained; these steroids inhibited only the 5α-reductase type 2 enzyme.Finasteride and steroids 4, 5, 7b, 8a showed a comparable in vivo pharmacological activity, however the IC₅₀ values of these compounds were higher as compared to that of finasteride.These results indicated also that steroids 4, 5, 7a, and 7b bind to the androgen receptor whereas compounds 6, 8a and 8b failed to do so.The overall data from this study showed that steroids 5 and 7b bind to the AR and decreased of the growth of prostate and seminal vesicles. Moreover, 4 decreased also the growth of seminal vesicles.     

Identification of membrane progestin receptors (mPR) in goldfish oocytes as a key mediator of steroid non-genomic action

One of the most extensively investigated and well characterized models of non-genomic steroid actions initiated at the cell surface is the induction of oocyte maturation (OM) in fish and amphibians by progestin. Gonadotropin induces the final phase of oocyte maturation indirectly by inducing the synthesis of maturation inducing steroids (MIS) by the ovarian follicles via its membrane receptor, membrane progestin receptor (mPR). Three mPR subtypes (α, β and γ) have been identified by cDNA cloning or by in silico analysis of genome sequence databases. Previously, we described the cloning of the mPRα cDNA from a goldfish ovarian cDNA library and obtained experimental evidence that the mPRα protein is an intermediary in MIS induction of OM in goldfish. Then we cloned one β and two γ subtypes (hereafter referred to as γ-1 and γ-2) from a goldfish ovarian cDNA library. RT-PCR showed different tissue expression patterns of the mRNAs for these mPR subtypes. However, in addition to mPRα, the β, γ-1 and γ-2 subtypes were also expressed in follicle-enclosed oocytes. Microinjection of goldfish oocytes with a morpholino antisense oligonucleotide to mPRβ blocked the induction of oocyte maturational competence, whereas injection of antisense oligonucleotides to mPRγ-1 and γ-2 were ineffective. These results suggest that goldfish mPRβ protein acts as an intermediary during MIS induction of OM in goldfish, in a manner similar to mPRα. We are establishing mutant strains of Medaka fish to investigate the roles of mPR proteins in vivo produced by Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes (Tilling) strategy. By the screening, we have selected three strains in which a point mutation was induced in each strain at the coding sequence of mPRα. In near future results of phenotypic analysis of mPRα defective fish will be introduced.     

Hydrocortisone binding receptor in the rat pituitary GH3 cell line.

A receptor with specificity and high affinity for hydrocortisone (HC) has been found in the cytosol of GH₃ cells, a growth hormone (GH) producing culture. Scatchard analysis indicated that the interaction of [³H]HC with the receptor has an apparent dissociation constant (K_d) of about 6.0 × 10^?9M and a concentration of binding sites of approx. 1 × 10^?13 mol/mg cytosol protein. The second order association rate constant was determined to be 1.5 × 10⁶ M^?1 min^?1. The receptor activity is stable at 2°C for several hours, but is destroyed completely by heating at 37°C for 1 hour, or by treatment with pronase, only partially by RNase, but not by DNase. The binding of [³H]HC to the cytosol receptor is inhibited by unlabeled progesterone (PR) or dexamethasone to the same extent as the inhibition by unlabeled HC. However, it is only partially inhibited by testosterone, 17-methyl-testosterone, 17α and 17β-estradiol, and 4-pregnen-20β-ol-3-one, and is unaffected by 5α-pregnan-3β,20β-diol. The biological role for these receptors in the regulation of GH synthesis is supported by the observations that the HC-stimulated production of GH is antagonized by PR, which competes with the binding of HC to the receptor.     

Imidazo[1,2-α]pyridines possess adenosine A1 receptor affinity for the potential treatment of cognition in neurological disorders

Previous research has shown that bicyclic 6:5-fused heteroaromatic compounds with two N-atoms have variable degrees of adenosine A₁ receptor antagonistic activity. Prompted by this imidazo[1,2-α]pyridine analogues were synthesized and evaluated for their adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptor affinity via radioligand binding studies and subjected to a GTP shift assay to determine its adenosine A₁ receptor agonistic or antagonistic functionality. Imidazo[1,2-α]pyridine, the parent scaffold, was found devoid of affinity for the adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptors. The influence of substitution on position C2 showed no improvement for either adenosine A₁ or A_2A receptor affinity. The addition of an amino or a cyclohexylamino group to position C3 also showed no improvement of adenosine A₁ or A_2A receptor affinity. Surprisingly para-substitution on the phenyl ring at position C2 in combination with a cyclohexylamino group at position C3 led to adenosine A₁ receptor affinity in the low micromolar range with compound 4d showing: (1) the highest affinity for the adenosine A₁ receptor with a K_i value of 2.06 µM and (2) adenosine A₁ receptor antagonistic properties. This pilot study concludes that para-substituted 3-cyclohexylamino-2-phenyl-imidazo[1,2-α]pyridine analogues represent an interesting scaffold to investigate further structure-activity relationships in the design of novel imidazo[1,2-α]pyridine-based adenosine A₁ receptor antagonists for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders.     

Regulation of cytosol and nuclear progesterone receptors in rabbit uterus by estrogen,antiestrogen and progesterone administration

A synthetic progestin, 16α-ethyl-21-hydroxy-19-nor-4-pregnene-3,20-dione (ORG 2058), was utilized to measure progesterone receptors from the rabbit uterus. This steroid has a high affinity for both cytosol and nuclear receptors, with K_D values of 1.2 nM (at 0–4°C) and 2.3 nM (at 15°C), respectively. Administration of estradiol-17β or a non-steroidal antiestrogen, tamoxifen, for 5 days to estrous rabbits led to a progressive rise in the cytosol receptor levels: from 34 000 to 120 000 (estradiol-17β) and 80 000 (tamoxifen) receptors/ cell, without any major influence on the nuclear receptor content. A single intravenous injection of progesterone (5 mg/kg) elicited a 3-fold increase in the mean nuclear receptor content at 30 min after injection (from 18 000 to 48 000 receptors/nucleus). Nuclear receptor accumulation was short-lived and returned to control levels within 4 h after treatment. A second dose of progesterone given 24 h later doubled the nuclear receptor level (from 18 000 to 35 000 receptor/nucleus). The concomitant decline in the cytosol receptor content was twice that accounted for by the nuclear receptor accumulation (70 000 vs. 30 000, and 40 000 vs. 17 000 receptors/cell, after the first and second progesterone injection, respectively). Following progesterone administration, the cytosol receptor level reached a nadir by 30 min, exhibited minimal replenishment within the ensuing 24 h, and remained at approx. 50% of the pretreatment values. After a single dose or two consecutive doses of progesterone, total uterine progesterone receptor content declined to about 60% of the level prior to each dose, a nadir being reached at 2 h after treatment.     

Structural features of pregna-D'-pentaranes determining their interaction with three rat proteins

Competition of a number of progesterone 16alpha,17alpha-cycloalkane derivatives with 3H-labeled ligands for the binding sites of the rat uterine progesterone receptor, uterine pentaranophilin, and blood serum pentaranophilin was studied. We found that the selective ligands for the progesterone receptor are progesterone, 16alpha,17alpha-cyclopropanoprogesterone, and 16alpha,17alpha-cyclopent-3'-enoprogesterone and the selective ligands for serum pentaranophilin are 6alpha-methyl-16alpha,17alpha-cyclohexanopregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione and 3beta-hydroxy-16alpha,17alpha-cyclohexanopregn-5-en-20-one. No selective ligands for the uterine pentaranophilin were found. The majority of substituents in rings A, B, and D' we studied decreased the affinity of ligands for all the three proteins. The substitution of the delta5-3beta-hydroxy grouping for the delta4-3-keto grouping exerted the strongest negative effect in the case of the progesterone receptor and the uterine pentaranophilin, whereas the introduction of the 3',4'-dimethyl grouping strongly inhibited the ligand affinity for the uterine pentaranophilin. The extent and even the direction of the effect of a substituent on the affinity of ligands for the proteins substantially depended on the presence of other substituents in the steroid molecules. We hypothesized that a certain similarity exists between three proteins studied in respect to the structures of their ligand-binding pockets. The English version of the paper: Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry, 2004, vol. 30, no. 3; see also http://www.maik.ru.     

Interaction of A-nor A.19-dinor,and A-homo-5α-androstane derivatives with the androgen receptor and the epididymal androgen-binding protein

The equilibrium affinity constant for rat prostate androgen receptor and epididymal androgen binding protein (ABP) has been determined for thirty-four potential progestogens. Three A-nor-, four A,19-dinor-, and one A-homo-5α-androstane derivative bind to the androgen receptor (K_D<0.5 μM). Five of these compounds also bind to ABP with an affinity of the same order of magnitude. “Anordrin” (compound $\text{24}$) and “Dinordrins” (compounds $\text{10, 14, 15, 16, 17}$), which are potential female contraceptives, do not bind with high affinity to the androgen receptor or to ABP. The following modifications in A-nor derivatives favour binding to the receptor as compared to ABP: 19-nor substitution (compound $\text{1}$), C-18 methyl homologation (compound $\text{5}$), 2α-ethinylation (compound $\text{22}$). One 2α-allenyl A-nor derivative (compound $\text{25}$) and one A-homo derivative (compound $\text{34}$) bind almost exclusively to ABP. The interaction with either binding protein is decreased by oxidation or esterification of the hydroxyl group at C-17, and by addition of a 17 α-ethinyl group. The latter modifications are likely to increase the specificity of androstane derivatives for receptors other than androgen binding proteins, such as the progesterone receptor.