The essential requirement of an animal heme peroxidase protein during the wing maturation process in Drosophila

Background

Thus far, a handful of genes have been shown to be related to the wing maturation process in insects. A novel heme peroxidase enzyme known as curly suppressor (Cysu)(formerly CG5873), have been characterized in this report because it is involved in wing morphogenesis. Using bioinformatics tools we found that Cysu is remarkably conserved in the genus Drosophila (>95%) as well as in invertebrates (>70%), although its vertebrate orthologs show poor homology. Time-lapse imaging and histochemical analyses have confirmed that the defective wing phenotype of Cysu is not a result of any underlying cellular alterations; instead, its wings fail to expand in mature adults.

Results

The precise requirement of Cysu in wings was established by identifying a bona fide mutant of Cysu from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Centre collection. Its requirement in the wing has also been shown by RNA knockdown of the gene. Subsequent transgenic rescue of the mutant wing phenotype with the wild-type gene confirmed the phenotype resulting from Cysu mutant. With appropriate GAL4 driver like engrailed-GAL4, the Cysu phenotype was compartmentalized, which raises a strong possibility that Cysu is not localized in the extracellular matrix (ECM); hence, Cysu is not engaged in bonding the dorsal and ventral cuticular layers. Finally, shortened lifespan of the Cysu mutant suggests it is functionally essential for other biological processes as well.

Conclusion

Cysu, a peroxinectin-like gene, is required during the wing maturation process in Drosophila because as a heme peroxidase, Cysu is capable of utilizing H₂O₂, which plays an essential role in post-eclosion wing morphogenesis.

     

Dual oxidase in the intestinal epithelium of zebrafish larvae has anti-bacterial properties

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) function in a range of physiological processes such as growth, metabolism and signaling, and also have a pathological role. Recent research highlighted the requirement for ROS generated by dual oxidase (DUOX) in host-defence responses in innate immunity and inflammatory disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but in vivo evidence to support this has, to date, been lacking. In order to investigate the involvement of Duox in gut immunity, we characterized the zebrafish ortholog of the human DUOX genes. Zebrafish duox is highly expressed in intestinal epithelial cells. Knockdown of Duox impaired larval capacity to control enteric Salmonella infection.     

Unexpected role of the IMD pathway in Drosophila gut defense against Staphylococcus aureus

In this study, fruit fly of the genus Drosophila is utilized as a suitable model animal to investigate the molecular mechanisms of innate immunity. To combat orally transmitted pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria, the Drosophila gut is armed with the peritrophic matrix, which is a physical barrier composed of chitin and glycoproteins: the Duox system that produces reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn sterilize infected microbes, and the IMD pathway that regulates the expression of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), which in turn control ROS-resistant pathogens. However, little is known about the defense mechanisms against Gram-positive bacteria in the fly gut. Here, we show that the peritrophic matrix protects Drosophila against Gram-positive bacteria S. aureus. We also define the few roles of ROS in response to the infection and show that the IMD pathway is required for the clearance of ingested microbes, possibly independently from AMP expression. These findings provide a new aspect of the gut defense system of Drosophila, and helps to elucidate the processes of gut-microbe symbiosis and pathogenesis.     

Characterization of hydrogen peroxide production by Duox in bronchial epithelial cells exposed to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Hydrogen peroxide production by the NADPH oxidase Duox1 occurs during activation of respiratory epithelial cells stimulated by purified bacterial ligands, such as lipopolysaccharide. Here, we characterize Duox activation using intact bacterial cells of several airway pathogens. We found that only Pseudomonas aeruginosa, not Burkholderia cepacia or Staphylococcus aureus, triggers H₂O₂ production in bronchial epithelial cells in a calcium-dependent but predominantly ATP-independent manner. Moreover, by comparing mutant Pseudomonas strains, we identify several virulence factors that participate in Duox activation, including the type-three secretion system. These data provide insight on Duox activation by mechanisms unique to P. aeruginosa.     

Mutants of the bithorax complex and determinative states in the thorax of Drosophila melanogaster.

Homoeotic mutations of the bithorax complex cause segmental transformations. The genes in which these mutations occur are good candidates for genes that are involved in determination. The determination system in imaginal discs must have at least two functions. One is a cell heredity function that is responsible for maintaining the determined state during growth and development. A second is the expression of the determined state (e.g., different imaginal discs have different morphologies). The homoeotic mutations of the bithorax complex could be affecting either of these two functions. I have found that when posterior haltere disc cells, that are transformed by the mutation postbithorax so that they form wing cuticle in situ, regenerate anterior structures, these structures are anterior wing. This is the same result as that seen when wild-type posterior-wing disc cells regenerate anterior structures. On the other hand, when anterior haltere disc cells transformed by the mutation bithorax³, so that they produce wing cuticle in situ, regenerate, they produce posterior haltere structures. This is unlike wild-type anterior-wing disc cells, which regenerate posterior-wing structures. From these results, I conclude that bithorax³ affects the expression of the determined state and postbithorax affects the cell heredity of determination.     

Regulation of Nox and Duox enzymatic activity and expression

In recent years, it has become clear that reactive oxygen species (ROS, which include superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and other metabolites) are produced in biological systems. Rather than being simply a by-product of aerobic metabolism, it is now recognized that specific enzymes--the Nox (NADPH oxidase) and Duox (Dual oxidase) enzymes--seem to have the sole function of generating ROS in a carefully regulated manner, and key roles in signal transduction, immune function, hormone biosynthesis, and other normal biological functions are being uncovered. The prototypical Nox is the respiratory burst oxidase or phagocyte oxidase, which generates large amounts of superoxide and other reactive species in the phagosomes of neutrophils and macrophages, playing a central role in innate immunity by killing microbes. This enzyme system has been extensively studied over the past two decades, and provides a basis for comparison with the more recently described Nox and Duox enzymes, which generate ROS in a variety of cells and tissues. This review first considers the structure and regulation of the respiratory burst oxidase, and then reviews recent studies relating to the regulation of the activity of the novel Nox/Duox enzymes. The regulation of Nox and Duox expression in tissues and by specific stimuli is also considered here. An accompanying review considers biological and pathological roles of the Nox family of enzymes.     

Stimulation by P2X7 receptors of calcium-dependent production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in rat submandibular glands

Background

Agonists of P2X₇ receptors increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in immunocytes. In this work we tested this response and its effect on mitochondrial inner membrane potential (Δψ_m) in exocrine glands.

Methods

The production of ROS by rat submandibular glands was investigated by measuring the oxidation of dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCFH), a fluorescent probe. The Δψ_m was estimated with tetramethylrhodamine.

Results

Activation of P2X₇ receptors by ATP or Bz-ATP increased the production of ROS. This response was not modified by inhibitors of phospholipase A2 or of various kinases. The effect of ATP was calcium-dependent and was blocked by diphenyliodonium, an inhibitor of flavoproteins. It was not affected by rotenone, an inhibitor of the complex I of the mitochondrial electron transfer chain. Scavengers of ROS had no effect on the dissipation of Δψ_m by ATP.

Conclusions

We conclude that, in rat submandibular glands, P2X₇ receptors stimulate in a calcium-dependent manner an oxidase generating ROS, suggesting the involvement of the dual oxidase Duox2. The production of ROS does not contribute to the depolarization of mitochondria by purinergic agonists.

General significance

Purinergic receptors could be regulators of the bactericidal properties of saliva by promoting both the secretion of peroxidase from acinar cells and by activating Duox2.     

Overexpression of Human Amyloid Precursor Protein in Drosophila

Amyloid precursor protein (APP) is the precursor of the β-amyloid peptide which is associated with Alzheimer's disease. The physiological function of APP is not well understood. We have established model system for the analysis of APP function in Drosophila. In neural cells, overexpressed human APP was transported to the synaptic terminal in a manner similar to its localization in human neurons, which suggested that the Drosophila protein transport system localizes human APP appropriately. Expression of APP in imaginal discs resulted in a defect in adult cuticle secretion and a blistered wing phenotype. The severity of the wing blister phenotype was proportional to the APP expression level. These results suggested the presence in Drosophila wing tissue of a protein or protein(s) which can interact with APP.     

Stimulating cROSstalk between commensal bacteria and intestinal stem cells

EMBO J (2013) 32 23, 3017–3028 10.1038/emboj.2013.224; published online October182013Commensal gut bacteria benefit their host in many ways, for instance by aiding digestion and producing vitamins. In a new study in The EMBO Journal, Jones et al (2013) report that commensal bacteria can also promote intestinal epithelial renewal in both flies and mice. Interestingly, among commensals this effect is most specific to Lactobacilli, the friendly bacteria we use to produce cheese and yogurt. Lactobacilli stimulate NADPH oxidase (dNox/Nox1)-dependent ROS production by intestinal enterocytes and thereby activate intestinal stem cells.The human gut contains huge numbers of bacteria (∼10¹⁴/person) that play beneficial roles for our health, including digestion, building our immune system and competing with harmful microbes (Sommer and Backhed, 2013). Both commensal and pathogenic bacteria can elicit antimicrobial responses in the intestinal epithelium and also stimulate epithelial turnover (Buchon et al, 2013; Sommer and Backhed, 2013). In contrast to gut pathogens, relatively little is known about how commensal bacteria influence intestinal turnover. In a simple yet elegant study reported recently in The EMBO Journal, Jones et al (2013) show that among several different commensal bacteria tested, only Lactobacilli promoted much intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation, and it did so by stimulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Interestingly, the specific effect of Lactobacilli was similar in both Drosophila and mice. In addition to distinguishing functional differences between species of commensals, this work suggests how the ingestion of Lactobacillus-containing probiotic supplements or food (e.g., yogurt) might support epithelial turnover and health.In both mammals and insects, ISCs give rise to intestinal enterocytes, which not only absorb nutrients from the diet but must also interact with the gut microbiota (Jiang and Edgar, 2012). The metazoan intestinal epithelium has developed conserved responses to enteric bacteria, for instance the expression of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs; Gallo and Hooper, 2012; Buchon et al, 2013), presumably to kill harmful bacteria while allowing symbiotic commensals to flourish. In addition to AMPs, intestinal epithelial cells use NADPH family oxidases to generate ROS that are used as microbicides (Lambeth and Neish, 2013). High ROS levels during enteric infections likely act non-discriminately against both commensals and pathogens, but controlled, low-level ROS can act as signalling molecules that regulate various cellular processes including proliferation (Lambeth and Neish, 2013). In flies, exposure to pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria has been reported to result in ROS (H₂O₂) production by an enzyme called dual oxidase (Duox; Ha et al, 2005). Duox activity in the fly intestine (and likely also the mammalian one) has recently been discovered to be stimulated by uracil secretion by pathogenic bacteria (Lee et al, 2013). In the mammalian intestine another enzyme, NADPH oxidase (Nox), has also been shown to produce ROS in the form of superoxide (O₂⁻), in this case in response to formylated bacterial peptides (Lambeth and Neish, 2013). A conserved role for Nox in the Drosophila intestinal epithelium had not until now been explored.Jones et al (2013) checked seven different commensal bacterial to see which would stimulate ROS production by the fly''s intestinal epithelium, and found that only one species, a Gram-positive Lactobacillus, could stimulate significant production of ROS in intestinal enterocytes. Five bacterial species were checked in mice or cultured intestinal cells, and again it was a Lactobacillus that generated the strongest ROS response. Although not all of the most prevalent enteric bacteria were assayed, those others that were—such as E. coli—induced only mild, barely detectable levels of ROS in enterocytes. Surprisingly, although bacteria pathogenic to Drosophila, like Erwinia caratovora, were expected to stimulate ROS production via Duox, Jones et al (2013) did not observe this using the ROS detecting dye hydrocyanine-Cy3, or a ROS-sensitive transgene reporter, Glutatione S-transferase-GFP, in flies. Further, Jones et al (2013) found that genetically suppressing Nox in either Drosophila or mice decreased ROS production after Lactobacillus ingestion. Consistent with the important role of Nox, Duox appeared not to be required for ROS production after Lactobacillus ingestion. In addition, Jones et al (2013) found that Lactobacilli also promoted DNA replication—a metric of cell proliferation and epithelial renewal—in the fly''s intestine, and that this was also ROS- and Nox-dependent. Again, the same relationship was found in the mouse small intestine. Together, these results suggest a conserved mechanism by which Lactobacilli can stimulate Nox-dependent ROS production in intestinal enterocytes and thereby promote ISC proliferation and enhance gut epithelial renewal.In the fly midgut, uracil produced by pathogenic bacteria can stimulate Duox-dependent ROS production, which is thought to act as a microbicide (Lee et al, 2013), and can also promote ISC proliferation (Buchon et al, 2009). However, Duox-produced ROS may also damage the intestinal epithelium itself and thereby promote epithelial regeneration indirectly through stress responses. In this disease scenario, ROS appears to be sensed by the stress-activated Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK; Figure 1A), which can induce pro-proliferative cytokines of the Leptin/IL-6 family (Unpaireds, Upd1–3) (Buchon et al, 2009; Jiang et al, 2009). These cytokines activate JAK/STAT signalling in the ISCs, promoting their growth and proliferation, and accelerating regenerative repair of the gut epithelium (Buchon et al, 2009; Jiang et al, 2009). It is also possible, however, that low-level ROS, or specific types of ROS (e.g., H₂O₂) might induce ISC proliferation directly by acting as a signal between enterocytes and ISCs. Since commensal Lactobacillus stimulates ROS production via Nox rather than Duox, this might be a case in which a non-damaging ROS signal promotes intestinal epithelial renewal without stress signalling or a microbicidal effect (Figure 1B). However, Jones et al (2013) stopped short of ruling out a role for oxidative damage, cell death or stress signalling in the intestinal epithelium following colonization by Lactobacilli, and so these parameters must be checked in future studies. Perhaps even the friendliest symbiotes cause a bit of ‘healthy'' damage to the gut lining, stimulating it to refresh and renew. Whether damage-dependent or not, the stimulation of Drosophila ISC proliferation by commensals and pathogens alike appears to involve the same cytokine (Upd3; Buchon et al, 2009), and so some of the differences between truly pathogenic and ‘friendly'' gut microbes might be ascribed more to matters of degree than qualitative distinctions. Future studies exploring exactly how different types of ROS signals stimulate JNK activity, gut cytokine expression and epithelial renewal should be able to sort this out, and perhaps help us learn how to better manage the ecosystems in our own bellies. From the lovely examples reported by Jones et al (2013), an experimental back-and-forth between the Drosophila and mouse intestine seems an informative way to go.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Metazoan intestinal epithelial responses to commensal and pathogenic bacteria. (A) High reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels generated by dual oxidase (Duox) in response to uracil secretion by pathogenic bacteria. (B) Low ROS levels generated by NADPH oxidase (Nox) in response to commensal bacteria. In addition to acting as a microbiocide, ROS in flies may stimulate JNK signaling and cytokine (Upd 1–3) expression in enterocytes, thereby stimulating ISC proliferation and epithelial turnover or regeneration. Whether this stimulation required damage to or loss of enterocytes has yet to be explored.     

Butterfly Wings Are Three-Dimensional: Pupal Cuticle Focal Spots and Their Associated Structures in Junonia Butterflies

Butterfly wing color patterns often contain eyespots, which are developmentally determined at the late larval and early pupal stages by organizing activities of focal cells that can later form eyespot foci. In the pupal stage, the focal position of a future eyespot is often marked by a focal spot, one of the pupal cuticle spots, on the pupal surface. Here, we examined the possible relationships of the pupal focal spots with the underneath pupal wing tissues and with the adult wing eyespots using Junonia butterflies. Large pupal focal spots were found in two species with large adult eyespots, J. orithya and J. almana, whereas only small pupal focal spots were found in a species with small adult eyespots, J. hedonia. The size of five pupal focal spots on a single wing was correlated with the size of the corresponding adult eyespots in J. orithya. A pupal focal spot was a three-dimensional bulge of cuticle surface, and the underside of the major pupal focal spot exhibited a hollowed cuticle in a pupal case. Cross sections of a pupal wing revealed that the cuticle layer shows a curvature at a focal spot, and a positional correlation was observed between the cuticle layer thickness and its corresponding cell layer thickness. Adult major eyespots of J. orithya and J. almana exhibited surface elevations and depressions that approximately correspond to the coloration within an eyespot. Our results suggest that a pupal focal spot is produced by the organizing activity of focal cells underneath the focal spot. Probably because the focal cell layer immediately underneath a focal spot is thicker than that of its surrounding areas, eyespots of adult butterfly wings are three-dimensionally constructed. The color-height relationship in adult eyespots might have an implication in the developmental signaling for determining the eyespot color patterns.     

A Dityrosine Network Mediated by Dual Oxidase and Peroxidase Influences the Persistence of Lyme Disease Pathogens within the Vector

Ixodes scapularis ticks transmit a wide array of human and animal pathogens including Borrelia burgdorferi; however, how tick immune components influence the persistence of invading pathogens remains unknown. As originally demonstrated in Caenorhabditis elegans and later in Anopheles gambiae, we show here that an acellular gut barrier, resulting from the tyrosine cross-linking of the extracellular matrix, also exists in I. scapularis ticks. This dityrosine network (DTN) is dependent upon a dual oxidase (Duox), which is a member of the NADPH oxidase family. The Ixodes genome encodes for a single Duox and at least 16 potential peroxidase proteins, one of which, annotated as ISCW017368, together with Duox has been found to be indispensible for DTN formation. This barrier influences pathogen survival in the gut, as an impaired DTN in Doux knockdown or in specific peroxidase knockdown ticks, results in reduced levels of B. burgdorferi persistence within ticks. Absence of a complete DTN formation in knockdown ticks leads to the activation of specific tick innate immune pathway genes that potentially resulted in the reduction of spirochete levels. Together, these results highlighted the evolution of the DTN in a diverse set of arthropod vectors, including ticks, and its role in protecting invading pathogens like B. burgdorferi. Further understanding of the molecular basis of tick innate immune responses, vector-pathogen interaction, and their contributions in microbial persistence may help the development of new targets for disrupting the pathogen life cycle.     

Geminin and Brahma act antagonistically to regulate EGFR-Ras-MAPK signaling in Drosophila

Geminin was identified in Xenopus as a dual function protein involved in the regulation of DNA replication and neural differentiation. In Xenopus, Geminin acts to antagonize the Brahma (Brm) chromatin-remodeling protein, Brg1, during neural differentiation. Here, we investigate the interaction of Geminin with the Brm complex during Drosophila development. We demonstrate that Drosophila Geminin (Gem) interacts antagonistically with the Brm-BAP complex during wing development. Moreover, we show in vivo during wing development and biochemically that Brm acts to promote EGFR-Ras-MAPK signaling, as indicated by its effects on pERK levels, while Gem opposes this. Furthermore, gem and brm alleles modulate the wing phenotype of a Raf gain-of-function mutant and the eye phenotype of a EGFR gain-of-function mutant. Western analysis revealed that Gem over-expression in a background compromised for Brm function reduces Mek (MAPKK/Sor) protein levels, consistent with the decrease in ERK activation observed. Taken together, our results show that Gem and Brm act antagonistically to modulate the EGFR-Ras-MAPK signaling pathway, by affecting Mek levels during Drosophila development.     

Spalt major controls the development of the notum and of wing hinge primordia of the Drosophila melanogaster wing imaginal disc

The Drosophila wing and the dorsal thorax develop from primordia within the wing imaginal disc. Here we show that spalt major (salm) is expressed within the presumptive dorsal body wall primordium early in wing disc development to specify notum and wing hinge tissue. Upon ectopic salm expression, dorsally located second leg disc cells develop notum and wing hinge tissue instead of sternopleural tissue. Similarly, by salm over-expression within the wing disc, wing blade formation is suppressed and a mirror-image duplication of the notum and wing hinge is formed. In large dorsal clones, which lack salm and its neighboring paralogue spalt related (salr), the cells of the notum primordium do not grow; these dorsal cells are not specified as notum, hence no notum outgrowth develops. These results suggest that the zinc finger factors encoded by the salm/salr complex play important roles in defining cells of the early wing disc as dorsal body wall cells, which develop into a large dorsal body wall territory and form mesonotum and some wing hinge tissue, and in delimiting the wing primordium. We also find that salm activity is down-regulated by its own product and by that of the Pax gene eyegone.     

The use of model systems to study biological functions of Nox/Duox enzymes

ROS (reactive oxygen species; including superoxide and H202) are conventionally thought of as being broadly reactive and cytotoxic. Phagocytes utilize an NADPH oxidase to generate large amounts of ROS, and exploit their toxic properties as a host-defence mechanism to kill invading microbes. However, the recent discovery of the Nox and Duox enzymes that are expressed in many non-phagocytic cells implies that the 'deliberate' generation of ROS has additional cellular roles, which are currently incompletely understood. Functions of ROS in mammals have been inferred primarily from cell-culture experiments, and include signalling for mitogenic growth, apoptosis and angiogenesis. Nox/Duox enzymes may also provide H202 as a substrate for peroxidase enzymes (or, in the case of Duox, for its own peroxidase domain), thereby supporting peroxidative reactions. A broad comparison of biological functions of ROS and Nox enzymes across species and kingdoms provides insights into possible functions in mammals. To further understand novel biological roles for Nox/Duox enzymes, we are manipulating the expression of Nox/Duox enzymes in model organisms including Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster and mouse. This chapter focuses on new insights into the roles of Nox enzymes gained from these approaches.     

The Extracellular A-loop of Dual Oxidases Affects the Specificity of Reactive Oxygen Species Release

NADPH oxidase (Nox) family proteins produce superoxide (O₂^⨪) directly by transferring an electron to molecular oxygen. Dual oxidases (Duoxes) also produce an O₂^⨪ intermediate, although the final species secreted by mature Duoxes is H₂O₂, suggesting that intramolecular O₂^⨪ dismutation or other mechanisms contribute to H₂O₂ release. We explored the structural determinants affecting reactive oxygen species formation by Duox enzymes. Duox2 showed O₂^⨪ leakage when mismatched with Duox activator 1 (DuoxA1). Duox2 released O₂^⨪ even in correctly matched combinations, including Duox2 + DuoxA2 and Duox2 + N-terminally tagged DuoxA2 regardless of the type or number of tags. Conversely, Duox1 did not release O₂^⨪ in any combination. Chimeric Duox2 possessing the A-loop of Duox1 showed no O₂^⨪ leakage; chimeric Duox1 possessing the A-loop of Duox2 released O₂^⨪. Moreover, Duox2 proteins possessing the A-loops of Nox1 or Nox5 co-expressed with DuoxA2 showed enhanced O₂^⨪ release, and Duox1 proteins possessing the A-loops of Nox1 or Nox5 co-expressed with DuoxA1 acquired O₂^⨪ leakage. Although we identified Duox1 A-loop residues (His¹⁰⁷¹, His¹⁰⁷², and Gly¹⁰⁷⁴) important for reducing O₂^⨪ release, mutations of these residues to those of Duox2 failed to convert Duox1 to an O₂^⨪-releasing enzyme. Using immunoprecipitation and endoglycosidase H sensitivity assays, we found that the A-loop of Duoxes binds to DuoxA N termini, creating more stable, mature Duox-DuoxA complexes. In conclusion, the A-loops of both Duoxes support H₂O₂ production through interaction with corresponding activators, but complex formation between the Duox1 A-loop and DuoxA1 results in tighter control of H₂O₂ release by the enzyme complex.     

Cuticle differentiation in the embryo of the amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis

The arthropod cuticle is a multilayered extracellular matrix produced by the epidermis during embryogenesis and moulting. Molecularly and histologically, cuticle differentiation has been extensively investigated in the embryo of the insect Drosophila melanogaster. To learn about the evolution of cuticle differentiation, we have studied the histology of cuticle differentiation during embryogenesis of the amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis, which had a common ancestor with Drosophila about 510 million years ago. The establishment of the layers of the Parhyale juvenile cuticle is largely governed by mechanisms observed in Drosophila, e.g. as in Drosophila, the synthesis and arrangement of chitin in the inner procuticle are separate processes. A major difference between the cuticle of Parhyale and Drosophila concerns the restructuring of the Parhyale dorsal epicuticle after deposition. In contrast to the uniform cuticle of the Drosophila larva, the Parhyale cuticle is subdivided into two regions, the ventral and the dorsal cuticles. Remarkably, the boundary between the ventral and dorsal cuticles is sharp suggesting active extracellular regionalisation. The present analysis of Parhyale cuticle differentiation should allow the characterisation of the cuticle-producing and -organising factors of Parhyale (by comparison with the branchiopod crustacean Daphnia pulex) in order to contribute to the elucidation of fundamental questions relevant to extracellular matrix organisation and differentiation. This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, grant number MO 1714/1-1).